TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

suks13 Archive

View 2 posts and 57 comments by suks13 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
170

Discriminationsuks13/r/MensRights17/09/23 12:59 PM
161

Activism/Supportsuks13/r/MensRights12/05/24 06:43 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Worst thing is they all get away with it
/r/MensRights23/07/26 05:41 PM
5

Ends with - shall I kill it cos it’s a male. Shows how normal baby murder is. needs to be called what it is. They did that in India to stop people aborting girls (which was always illegal) and now people In the west doing the same to boys but legally 🤦‍♂️
/r/MensRights23/07/26 05:38 PM
5

This is kind of analogous to what is happening for the whole male humanity right now. Men today having to pay for the supposed mistreatment of women by men in the past
/r/MensRights24/06/26 11:15 PM
3

Womansplaining - that happens soon as the ring goes on it’s a switch
/r/MensRights06/03/26 09:55 PM
1

What country?
/r/MensRights04/03/26 08:17 AM
4

Great read 👍 100% agree
/r/MensRights07/01/26 07:32 PM
1

OP So far as ‘talking is not enough’ that’s all that’s happening here…. I’ve often tried to donate somewhere and looked for someone good organising. The closest I’ve got (and tbf could’ve tried harder) are charities which fund free lawyers who go in and rescue men from police who have arrested them on the hint of a whiff of a rumour that they have abused their wife / insert crime against a female here. This is required because there is a massive power imbalance and bias in the law (uk anyway) su…
/r/MensRights07/01/26 07:26 PM
20

The times article covering it basically said the match was ‘depressing’ & ‘had troubling undertones’ basically because the woman lost to the guy who had once supported Andrew Tate. Take a guess what gender the reporter was
/r/MensRights29/12/25 12:25 AM
7

Just leave males alone already
/r/MensRights18/12/25 08:42 PM
1

Yep, difference only exacerbated by mummy pig who is basically the main character and correcting him all the time- disgraceful
/r/MensRights03/12/25 06:05 AM
10

Why is there no coverage of the female side of the story. Just bad reporting. At the very least you’d expect the ‘women have done no wrong’ argument instead that side of the story is completely absent.
/r/MensRights27/11/25 10:21 PM
1

2 is still collateral though isn’t it..why is that needed. If the relationship breaks down the child will always remain both parents responsibility / will be placed into the mother’s care usually by default. So that’s double collateral. She’s still winning
/r/MensRights11/11/25 09:20 PM
13

100%. The danger now with all these articles (authored by disgruntled women as a result unsuccessful relationships) are that they find an audience in new generations and young people. Can’t let these idiots control the narrative and destroy another generation of kids (both genders ultimately suffer from the madness they peddle but men more)
/r/MensRights30/10/25 08:47 AM
6

The guardian article doesn’t even bother to hide the fact this is to specifically target men. UK law is & society is a joke. The whole of society (well men) are walking around oblivious to the fact they are trussed up like a pig. Every bloke is only ever a hairs breadth away from losing his freedom and/or children on the say so of any woman who is not required to provide evidence of anything. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/oct/21/family-law-shift-hailed-as-victory-for-children-facing-d…
/r/MensRights22/10/25 07:03 PM
1

Good man 👍
/r/MensRights11/08/25 09:51 PM
16

This is the way. Consider yourself very fortunate if your own family side with you too..
/r/MensRights05/07/25 10:46 PM
1

OP- in Kazak that means…’V.niiice’
/r/MensRights25/06/25 04:22 PM
2

I disagree with these comments, this guy has put a lot of truth into words and out there.
/r/MensRights12/06/25 10:12 PM
6

Already been unpacked here - his parents took him out of school to get him away from her too - it’s like the world’s most blatant and visible grooming case…https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/brigitte-emmanuel-macron-slap-marriage-b2760924.html
/r/MensRights31/05/25 03:22 PM
0

I don’t get you. I posted this because it’s related to the original post I.e hard to find a traditional woman. This article is about a woman being sacked for being traditional so 1. Is relevant to the subject matter and 2. merits some commentary about women who do try getting shot down/ losing their job. I.e. cards are stacked against finding a traditional woman
/r/MensRights29/03/25 04:01 PM
-1

Spare a thought for this woman who lost her job for having her head screwed on in a crazy world https://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/christian-influencer-sacked-london-catholic-school-b1219554.html
/r/MensRights29/03/25 02:31 PM
1

Got the last episode to watch so maybe should reserve judgement but this cannot be the upshot of it 🤦‍♂️
/r/MensRights24/03/25 11:56 PM
6

Go travelling - literally anywhere
/r/MensRights23/03/25 09:40 AM
11

https://inews.co.uk/inews-lifestyle/regret-belittling-men-63-ended-up-alone-3569366
/r/MensRights13/03/25 09:45 AM
7

Ffs
/r/MensRights17/02/25 11:32 PM
6

100%. But society just going along with it all the same. I don’t get how it’s just happening in plain sight.
/r/MensRights16/01/25 12:28 AM
2

She looks like the female punisher 😂
/r/MensRights07/01/25 10:25 PM
1

Not enough
/r/seduction23/12/24 06:00 PM
32

This is the way
/r/MensRights02/11/24 08:00 AM
1

‘More men are birthed than women’ - this is factually incorrect. A natural population has very slightly more females than males
/r/MensRights18/10/24 09:43 PM
8

Needs a ‘Not safe for anytime’ warning
/r/seduction06/10/24 10:09 PM
26

Supported to find evidence- absolutely. Supported to fabricate evidence and drag innocent people to jail just to get the CPS’s numbers (and public opinion) up - that would be a hard & clear no. But that is what is happening.
/r/MensRights03/09/24 07:42 PM
33

Why do you wish that
/r/seduction17/07/24 11:40 PM
4

There’s tonnes of YouTube videos about man’s who are celibate and apparently have massive super strength, will power, physical endurance and are able to achieve enlightenment. If I were you I’d carry on as you are and aim for that - given you’re half way there anyway. I’m sure it’s easier gaming a woman from an enlightened position anyhow.
/r/seduction14/07/24 07:31 PM
-2

And where were they all when I was at school
/r/MensRights04/07/24 11:24 PM
11

It won’t be overthrown, it will just be side stepped like this woman author is trying to do. ‘It’s not my fault, I was spoon fed feminism and radicalised’ is what she is saying. I don’t buy it. All women know they have a biological clock. Wilful ignorance / head in the sand is no excuse. They’re just trying to find a scapegoat. Cos it’s impossible for a woman to ever be wrong / own up.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 11:05 PM
1

Yep this side of the story you will never hear. And if it’s voiced, it’s ridiculed/belittled. When in actual fact the core principle/ foundation of the relationship has often been undermined in some way / shape or form.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 12:52 PM
3

In no way should abusive parents have unfettered access to children and I think we’ll be hard pressed to find someone that thinks the opposite. The issue is that this type of extreme example will clearly be misused to prevent fathers from seeing their children. This sort’ve thing becomes the go to ammunition in divorce- fathers are at more at risk of being falsely accused of aggression or be victims of exaggerated claims of it. Quoting from the article: “It's a very misogynistic system... that i…
/r/MensRights12/05/24 09:42 PM
4

Yes this is perceptive. But regardless of how badly thought out it is, it will be a vote winner in today’s climate so MP’s will line up to back it.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 09:30 PM
13

‘when you prep for marriage you need to prep for divorce as well.’ This should be taught in schools
/r/MensRights12/05/24 09:25 PM
3

In the case of the Garrick though you’re missing out the effect of it’s infamy resulting from all the paranoia peddled by all the women pressure groups. That no doubt had an effect in reducing member numbers indirectly and directly in the first place which reduced revenue. So ultimately the fact the club basically caved and let in women in an effort to increase membership and survive is a direct consequence of the feminist pressure groups & narrative.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 11:46 PM
1

I feel like what men put up with individually in a relationship with a woman, is playing out on a macro scale in the last 10 years of man bashing. E.g. in a relationship Men usually just have to shut up and put up, not having the energy or will to fight any battle let alone pick them. Women talk more (volume and rate), have a louder voice, which is more emotional and elicits more sympathy from friends/family/society in general not to mention the law/ myriad support groups. On the macro scale - z…
/r/MensRights11/05/24 11:25 PM
2

100%. Doesn’t matter how horrific the crime by women, today’s anti men/pro women brainwashing will make it a non thing. She got 4 years will be out in 1 - a man would have got 20 out in 12
/r/MensRights31/03/24 08:04 PM
1

I’ve always had a problem with the saying. Should be don’t hit anybody. If someone hits you, then defend yourself. Should be completely gender agnostic.
/r/MensRights31/03/24 07:49 PM
2

Didn’t Michael Douglass end this statement by also saying the only way to get rid of throat cancer is by performing more oral sex on women
/r/MensRights18/01/24 12:47 AM
2

I agree with this though I found she hulk ok - prob best of a bad bunch
/r/MensRights07/12/23 01:12 AM
4

Don’t do it
/r/MensRights11/11/23 04:16 PM
23

Ask it to explain some of the criticisms against feminism? This thing is based on neural networks so the more answers it creates the more content will be there for it to rely on in future, thereby making it easier for others to get to the ‘right’ (I.e. men’s rights are equivalent) answer in the future.
/r/MensRights07/10/23 02:44 PM
1

Ask it to explain some of the criticisms against feminism? This thing is based on neural networks so the more answers it creates the more content will be there for it to rely on in future, thereby making it easier for others to get to the ‘right’ (I.e. men’s rights are equivalent) answer in the future.
/r/MensRights07/10/23 02:43 PM
8

F me. This is terrible. There is just a relentless, unjustified tsunami of shite coming at men from all sides.
/r/MensRights07/10/23 02:38 PM
2

Interesting perspective and maybe correct but I fail to see how it relates to how that interview played out and the women’s responses to the male suicide rate: Male suicide rate is high... but women do more laundry. Male suicide rate is high... but men need to stand up against sexual harassment women face. ….. Clearly the subject matter is MALE suicide. Nobody should really be talking about women at that point. It’s off topic and unrelated. Had they said ‘this is how women cope and maybe men can…
/r/MensRights01/10/23 07:58 AM
2

Agreed - invited feminists on purpose during a talk about men. Cruel setup
/r/MensRights01/10/23 07:46 AM
1

It’s horrendous - worth complaining to OfCom
/r/MensRights01/10/23 07:44 AM
5

This is spot on analysis. The clever / articulate guys out there need to step up and teach everyone- saw a great YouTube on how to respond to these situations - uses Jordan Petersen shut down of a fierce UK presenter & feminist as a case study (everyone needs to learn from this: https://youtu.be/nS9W-wlJHPA?si=fBskadV4-8rAyPuI
/r/MensRights01/10/23 04:49 AM
3

Yes needs to say ‘alleged victim’ but doesn’t give a damn about it. They know they won’t get challenged on it by anyone…
/r/MensRights17/09/23 11:36 PM
3

Exactly…’how dare you defend yourself against my accusations that will ruin your life and earning ability forever..’ The worst bit is I can’t imagine many men can afford barristers to do this. So they are likely trying to quickly jump on this from a handful of cases and cause mainstream thinking (‘this is an outrage and violation against the accuser’) to kick in and do the work to put a stop to it.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 11:30 PM
7

If a man wrote a book called ‘I hate women’ he’d be arrested for incitement to hatred of women pdq. But before that could happen the book simply would not be published and it would be called a ‘manifesto’ instead.
/r/MensRights27/03/21 01:21 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter