TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

sumant28 Archive

View 33 posts and 327 comments by sumant28 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
31

CMVsumant28/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/15 04:14 AM
19

CMVsumant28/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 02:16 AM
17

Question for BluePillsumant28/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/15 01:21 AM
13

Question for BluePillsumant28/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/15 01:22 AM
12

CMVsumant28/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/15 11:33 PM
11

CMVsumant28/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/15 11:35 AM
10

CMVsumant28/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/15 12:04 PM
9

Discussionsumant28/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/15 02:42 AM
8

Discussionsumant28/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/15 04:44 AM
8

Question for BluePillsumant28/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/15 11:33 AM
8

CMVsumant28/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/15 03:11 AM
8

CMVsumant28/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/15 11:21 AM
7

Question for RedPillsumant28/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/15 04:00 AM
6

Question for RedPillsumant28/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/15 10:34 AM
6

Question for RedPillsumant28/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/15 04:49 AM
6

CMVsumant28/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/15 12:29 AM
5

Discussionsumant28/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/15 05:44 AM
5

CMVsumant28/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 11:13 AM
5

CMVsumant28/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/17 08:17 AM
4

CMVsumant28/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 04:17 AM
3

Discussionsumant28/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/15 07:33 AM
3

Discussionsumant28/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/15 09:51 AM
3

sumant28/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/15 07:01 AM
2

CMVsumant28/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/15 09:59 PM
2

Discussionsumant28/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/15 06:23 AM
2

Question for BluePillsumant28/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/15 06:09 AM
2

Question for BluePillsumant28/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/15 08:18 AM
1

Discussionsumant28/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/18 12:04 PM
1

Question for BluePillsumant28/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/15 07:44 AM
0

Question for BluePillsumant28/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/15 03:23 AM
0

Discussionsumant28/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/15 11:47 AM
0

CMVsumant28/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/15 11:50 PM
0

Question for BluePillsumant28/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/15 11:04 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Thank you that was very much worth the wait your quick wit is exemplary
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/17 02:25 AM
2

The truth hurts
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/17 04:01 AM
1

This is a good response but it's a bit long for me to muster the effort to respond thoroughly to. So there are presumably two schools of thought on differentiated crying behaviour between men and women. The first is that both groups feel the same pressure but one group spends more effort or is better at suppressing it. The second is that it is biological and individuals have essentially no choice with an involuntary behaviour. To respond to much of the early part of your comment I would say it m…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/17 10:27 AM
1

Makes sense but crying is too often done solitarily or not in the presence of men (women and children) to be ignored
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/17 09:34 AM
1

I don't need to fantasise about /u/goatismycopilot being an unpleasant to be around, shrill, and practically undatable post wall female when that's a description of reality
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/17 10:03 AM
1

You sound awful this is a perfect example of why men rarely desire a female after she hits the wall
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/17 04:02 AM
1

Today I had a meeting with my socialist group Ew.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/17 07:41 AM
3

I might lean red but the economist side of me appreciates your data driven and level headed approach to arguing for the bluepill side
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/17 12:30 AM
7

Did you get fat
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/17 07:40 AM
2

Most of the crowd of people subscribed here converges with the crowd saying women getting the vote was wrong and that they should be financially dependent on men in order for the man in his 40s to use his wealth as leverage
/r/TheRedPill27/04/17 12:31 AM
–

They took our jerbs!
/r/PussyPass19/04/17 07:28 PM
-2

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=zrMz0SyVqcY
/r/PussyPass06/04/17 01:50 AM
-5

They took our jerbs!
/r/PussyPass06/04/17 12:53 AM
1

She's put off by all the animal corpses putrefying in your digestive tract. I don't blame her
/r/askTRP20/03/17 07:55 AM
2

Another beta hipster, probably thinking Bill Clinton didn't enforce the laws by deporting 12 million illegal immigrants 20 years ago.. You are the feminazi socialist party of America. Bernie Sanders is your beta version of Che, Mao, Marx, and Hitler. The Constitution will not be torn to pieces by your blatant disregard of enforcing the laws that protect America, and your Global Socialist party will be stopped. You can hide under the "Democratic" party. But as a bluedog democrat, I see through yo…
/r/TheRedPill03/09/16 02:59 PM
0

All I'm doing is unearthing the depths of your hypocrisy by showing how angrily defensive you become when someone exposes it to you
/r/TheRedPill03/09/16 03:42 AM
-5

You don't need meat, the mere existence of vegan subreddit and millions of others living a cruelty free lifestyle disproves the notion. The reason you continue telling yourself that is because it's easier than to admit you're too lazy and selfish to change your habits even when you know it contributes to animal cruelty and suffering
/r/TheRedPill02/09/16 09:13 AM
-7

I would humbly suggest for you to end your hypocrisy in your decision to take the lives of numerous innocent animals every year
/r/TheRedPill02/09/16 08:41 AM
-10

You call yourself a libertarian yet you blatantly flout the non aggression principle by paying for animals to be tortured on factory farms to support your meat and dairy addiction. You're not the thoughtful intellectual you like to think of yourself as you're merely a selfish nihilist
/r/TheRedPill02/09/16 08:26 AM
1

Good luck making some serious gains in heart disease, stroke and cancer risk
/r/TheRedPill01/03/16 11:12 AM
7

Creeps don't count, they classify it differently as sexual harassment if betas express sexual desire. That's why they're constantly in a state of not being desired or loved from the opposite sex because alphas almost by definition sparingly give out validation.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/15 10:29 PM
0

Just reporting, that's their words not mine.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/15 12:25 AM
0

Economists are doing gods work debunking humanitard "researchers" in gender studies and sociology. I hope to be able to join them one day.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/15 12:04 AM
1

I start at a top law school in a week so I'll have to find out for sure but the people who work under my dad aren't beastly. lol, http://lawlemmings.tumblr.com. Good luck, even if you're t14
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/15 09:41 PM
1

Yes I have to clarify myself. I skimmed the video and was relying too much on the way the guy above phrased the beer being thrown at the person which made it seem in my mind like it was a beer bottle that was thrown and not as the video (which I just now watched fully) shows as a cup of beer being poured onto the person. If it was as I thought it was everything I said would still be correct. As an aside stop being so arrogant, I did criminal law at the top ranked institution in my country, this …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/15 09:34 AM
1

things appear to be different in the states, the common law theory around battery includes the eggshell doctrine which points strongly to it being something imposed among individuals rather than the state
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/15 05:25 AM
1

I don't understand how battery can be a crime. There is usually little public policy rationale to prosecute de minimis cases of battery but private individuals should be allowed to pursue that if they wish.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/15 05:16 AM
-1

Battery tends to be an intentional tort from what I've seen
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/15 02:23 AM
9

Edit.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/15 09:19 PM
0

Females have an instinctual repulsion to low value beta men who overtly express sexual desire. In general they would rather keep that to the alpha fucks. If they can characterise these undesirables as "nice guys" that's definitely a win for them which is why it is popular.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/15 10:12 PM
1

Just based off of the storefront is it possible to distinguish between actual massage parlours and sex service places?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/15 11:09 PM
1

What do you do as far as sex work? Anal? Rim jobs? What do you do if a guy specifically wants to make you orgasm and asks what turns you on to be able to do that
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/15 11:01 PM
2

you can enforce these language standards online. I'm sure irl you're very used to men bending over backwards to self-police themselves because as long as you're not hideous or obeast orbiters want to fuck you and don't want to ruin their chances. all that goes out the window online. You would be naive even thinking about enforcing it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/15 09:02 PM
1

What are you out of 10?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/15 08:44 PM
2

no I'm pretty sure the patriarchy forced her to do it
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/15 08:41 PM
1

the world isn't your tampon, I don't get this female obsession to cloud the meaning of words so that feelings don't get hurt
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/15 08:32 PM
2

In my country, girls outperform men at all levels of education overall. Women want to work in a STEM environment because they are interested in STEM and have ambitions to contribute to the STEM knowledge base. Also they care about earning money and doing a good job. very skeptical, sauce?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/15 01:11 AM
7

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lesbian_bed_death
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/15 11:46 PM
5

You don't sound like a woman. I just want to find the profile of what kind of people are into this way of thinking
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/15 03:25 AM
3

What do you do for a living out of curiosity?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/15 02:26 AM
4

From a neutral perspective it fascinates me to watch SJW types vacillate between emotional hysteria over ideas they disagree with to emotional obdurateness when they struggle to come up with counter arguments that challenge their views.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/15 02:10 AM
1

It's astonishing how butthurt people get when they're called out on their hypocrisy with their selective view of animals. I upvoted but since this is reddit you can always expected a negative for saying something like this
/r/TheRedPill30/07/15 10:31 PM
1

Killing for food is killing for pleasure. There are healthful and nutritious plant based foods and plant based alternatives to animal products that make the slaughter of animals completely unnecessary. There are also currently millions upon millions of people adhering to this lifestyle with some doing so since birth.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/15 10:28 PM
11

In that thread: alpha fux beta bux In this thread: hamstering Ultimately, yay for TRP being right about the nature of women! :/
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/15 06:20 AM
2

It matters because you're not able to disprove that what the guy actually did was say no to a relationship. Of course guys do that and all the time especially when they have enough clout to sleep around instead or attract a higher value LTR. The claim in the OP and in my post is that men do not reject casual sex from platonic female friends. That's why they have fuckzones not friendzone. It's the lower sex drive women who don't fuck down who have friendzones.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 01:26 PM
3

None of this really challenges my assertion. There are all sorts of ways that your subjective interpretation of a friendzone does not hold up to scrutiny. Did you imply that you were looking for LTR only and not FWB? Was he already in a relationship? Does he have a female sex drive? I know you're trying to one up me so let me clarify. I don't give a shit about insight into women's experiences, my comment was specifically addressed at the mentality of assuming other people (in this case men) have…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 01:16 PM
5

Unless the female is hideously disfigured most men would happily pump and dump all of their platonic female friends. It sounds like you're a woman, by extension you might think that guys think like you think. Please be aware that there are strong reasons why that is not the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 12:34 PM
0

As soon as they get their tits but not too soon after they start withering. Depends on the female.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 01:39 AM
5

There should be a subreddit dedicated specifically to side by side comparisons of pussy privilege and feminist hypocrisy. In addition to one in the OP there's another funny one about Emma Watson
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/15 01:23 AM
10

He's doing it wrong, the way to get female attention is to explicitly and publicly make it so that females are not allowed. That's what generates interest and makes them want to come because it shows the man's outcome independence of female attention and obviously indicates high status which is what piques their interest. As for your question, no, it should be obvious what pill I am.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/15 08:54 AM
3

Women are more terrified of being with a low status male than staying with a misbehaving high status one
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/15 12:42 PM
1

Change your diet to a high carb low fat one. If you have a disposition towards acne and you have a lot of fat in your diet your face will look like Hiroshima. I'd recommend a vegan or plant based one but you can also do this with animal products though not as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/15 09:11 PM
1

Females tend to think with their feelings. To any extent that this is acceptable (open your eyes, it's everywhere) society can be thought of as feminized.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/15 04:04 AM
2

Caring about animal rights and veganism would probably be a big departure
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/15 08:44 PM
2

You do realise that alpha fucks is sharing a high value male with other women right? That's what women primally tend to do but whether or not they are self aware as they are doing it is a different matter
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/15 07:27 AM
1

It might be a joke to you but to survivors of virtual rape like Sam Maggs it can be an emotional and traumatic experience. Please show more tact the next time you give your thoughts on this issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/15 11:54 PM
5

this couldn't have happened to a more deserving recipient, it's almost scary how accurately this story molds to redpill theory, I mean they couldn't have been able to write one themselves as good as this.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/15 08:31 PM
0

It's a game mod where people try to simulate sex on people's avatars. Sometimes headsets.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/15 12:21 PM
1

Mostly true but as an addendum because of the women are wonderful effect and general pussy privilege within society nice guys are demonised by the majority of people in contrast to nice girls who are able to garner sympathy
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/15 12:12 AM
2

You would think that this would be obvious enough to go without saying
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/15 12:09 AM
11

Incidentally, the BP answers to this question are a textbook example of how BP'ers can't understand generalizations, so they assume they can't exist. "Some do, some don't" is the hallmark of someone who doesn't see the world in terms of percentages, i.e. a logic-based thinker. Yes, some do, some don't, but the numbers are heavily skewed, which lends itself to the generalization. this is beautiful
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 05:13 PM
10

Sluts are like hipsters, I know one when I see one but the task of exhaustively laying out what makes one isn't worthwhile. It's to do with individual perception of someone else's mindset. Everyone is likely to differ slightly in their individual judgment
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 05:14 AM
4

My personal view of asexuals is that they are more aptly described as a sub category of exhibitionists who relish the attention they get from their supposed sexual dysphoria. As a result there's nothing to left to think of as far as placing them in the sexual market place.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 05:09 AM
0

At this rate I predict Alpha fucks beta bucks to be added to the dictionary before the start of the next decade
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 12:07 AM
3

Margaret Thatcher type personas who take shit from no one and aren't expecting special treatment because of what they have between their legs are fine by me. It's people like Hillary Clinton who squeeze every ounce out of the fact that she's a woman to pander to her fanbase who annoy me.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/15 01:30 AM
6

Wow are you me? I'm purple pill but lean red pill mostly and I think this way on this issue too. It's almost indisputable to me that women can be very particular in their tastes, much more so than men. The interesting question to ponder is whether even with their particular tastes does it aggregate to the small 20% or whatever small proportion of male population. I think as women age as well they both broaden their tastes but get more particular in their niche. To give a very crude example let's…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/15 03:06 AM
3

It's more of a dank internet thing with demographic convergence rather than something related to TRP ideology (imo). I don't think the crossover is any higher than what you see on r/conspiracy or r/tumblribaction
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/15 08:56 AM
2

Weight and age are equally important. I take weight out of the equation because I think there is an important distinction between lazy women who could be attractive and uggos who are doomed to being unattractive no matter what they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/15 08:29 AM
1

Here's how it works for me. The majority of women are inherently attractive. Excluding mitigating factors age and weight 80% are a 6 or higher. There's no way I'm going to standardise that on a bell curve because the math gets too hard. Most "starlets" are very attractive. Some aren't to my tastes but the vast, vast majority exceed 7. The only way a celebrity gets below that is if they're famous for being "talented for a girl" and "kinda hot". Lena Dunham is either a 5.5 or 6 on my scale. I feel…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/15 07:56 AM
1

I was originally quite Bluepill simply because I read about how redpill was described in most mainstream places on reddit. I came to this sub with I think an open mind and now consider myself purple pill but lean red.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/15 05:35 AM
3

Above all women are coddled and looked after by both other women absolutely and the majority of men and that's reflected in most social norms. I personally think subs against Jews and holocaust denial are much worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/15 04:31 AM
2

A lot of it imo is the 4chan kind of "let's piss off feminists by talking about what they hate the most" rather than actually going out and committing rape
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/15 04:28 AM
3

People only care about women's sports to the extent that male consumers can ogle attractive players. That's why tennis does so well. Obviously professional men destroy professional women but people are interested enough to watch attractive women play tennis reasonably well. Soccer has none of that since the camera is zoomed out too far to see what the girls properly look like.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/15 04:27 AM
12

She knows exactly what her SMV is. If she truly was insecure and thought lowly of herself she would be more than willing to take up an opportunity for one of the suitors to have a relationship. I think the majority of girls do however have a drive to be of higher SMV even if they may be high to begin with. They want that status and the best quality alphas who they perceive as normal everyday guys they should be with. The upset at not being at that level can mistakenly come across to someone like…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/15 12:38 PM
6

Make up does in fact deceive men as to the physical appearance of the wearer. Moreover it's not like personality is a monolithic thing, someone can look up a way of living, decide they like it and incorporate it into their lifestyle. This is what people do as a daily process every single day.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/15 09:38 PM
2

How do you think guys feel about face lifts, make up, boob jobs, high heels, spanx when they're looking for naturally attractive girls?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/15 08:57 PM
0

Women want both and will try for that if they can going former first then the latter. Alpha fucks, beta bucks.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/15 08:57 PM
4

He still gets to smash high quality pussy. That's even more desirable because for men it's not just about quality like it is for women, if you can get quality and quantity that's ideal
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/15 07:22 AM
1

You're not bluepill at all, pretty solidly purple
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/15 04:11 AM
8

Wtf are you talking about. The only girl I've her ever had sex with lay there like a starfish and most guys seem to experience the same thing. Women are passive, they lie there and they get fucked unless you decide to do something different.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/15 09:40 AM
2

Don't worry guys feminists have got this one covered. Thanks feminism. http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2014/10/02/the-good2go-sexual-consent-app-oversimplifying-consent-so-you-dont-have-to/
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/15 09:37 AM
0

The only thing left is to find some gay and/or asexual men for friendship. Either that or up your personality game which I already talked about
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/15 01:45 AM
1

This is indeed a longstanding conundrum that's not going away anytime soon. As a preliminary point I would say that there are some females that are interesting and/or funny enough for someone to want to spend time with them independent of their inherent sex appeal. Sadly this is a rarity because many I've seen don't have the interest to cultivate these traits since they easily get male attraction either way. You got to put yourself in their shoes, if I'm now taken what do I offer the single guys…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/15 12:23 AM
1

Tinder and online dating in general is terrible for attractive women (ew all these creeps keep messaging me, yuck) and unattractive men (beta bucks) quickly get filtered out. If you're in either of the two demographics you're going to have a bad time
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/15 10:50 PM
1

If the opinion is good enough for the great Patrice O'Neal (RIP) and many other actually funny people then it's good enough for me. Women have never made me laugh since they mostly don't come up with insights that transcend their own experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/15 08:46 PM
2

Free birth control, subsidised gender specific healthcare in general. More likely to introduce favourable employment regulations that impose quotas or whatever than benefit women at the expense of men
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/15 08:00 PM
5

Why do people laugh at their own roasts then? The more fundamental problem I think is that women aren't funny so they struggle to generate funny by themselves especially when their sjw worldview leaves many topics forbidden because it promotes patriarchy or rape culture
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/15 07:58 PM
1

They would think the woman in this video is talking more sense http://youtu.be/R3BL6pbP7FM
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/15 01:01 AM
2

I'm looking to double that by marrying someone high value
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/15 12:56 AM
5

What a heinous crime, how dare that girl find you attractive? I wonder if this is the same approach you take when discussing catcalling or people who try to do nice things for a women with the intention that it may start a relationship
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/15 08:50 PM
2

Raising an animal in complete isolation with no contact fucks them up http://youtu.be/hmdycJQi4QA. What you're proposing is incredibly cruel, I hate the way people casually think animals are just objects for humans to do as they please with. All this and I personally lean red pill on most topics here.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/15 06:01 AM
2

When you're that high value there is something to be said of the simplicity and romanticism of dating a guy or girl who you're absolutely sure will appreciate you and won't forget how lucky they are. These are the exceptions though IMO.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/15 03:26 AM
-1

This is what happens when you have a lazy welfarist population who demand $20 minimum wage with full pension. Learn how to economy next time and don't take the entire Eurozone with you
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/15 12:20 AM
-3

You may have problems if you enjoy thinking of yourself as a strong independent feminist progressive if you go for a religious guy. He probably wants a house wife who cooks, cleans, fits gender roles and doesn't put up with constant lecturing about rape culture
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/15 12:16 AM
3

What a wonderful reminder of how poor Bluepillers are at critical thinking. It's better for people with your mentality to default back to censorship, it's where you're more comfortable
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/15 11:58 PM
1

I've seen enough testimonials from regular posters in that sub to make up my own mind but I can see that it's baseless to others. At the end of the day this is sensitive controversial stuff and it's natural that people are outraged by r/theredpill
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/15 04:48 AM
2

Yes and no. Alpha fucks beta bucks.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/15 01:29 AM
18

Weak. Your first attempt at counter example has nothing to do with the point of delayed gratification, given how high wages are where I'm at there's no such thing as a bottoming out. Worst comes to worst there may be an adjustment of wages downward. Sure those guys can fuck around but they have no safety net of marrying up that women have. Many of those guys can't really do much else since they're not suited to academia often.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/15 12:35 AM
15

Are you kidding me? With respect to 12 how many women take psych or polisci at university knowing how bad the employment prospects are yet choose it anyway compared to men. Tertiary study is an extended hobby for them because they know that even if they fail they can marry up and ensure a comfortable life.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/15 12:06 AM
2

All these men are very nice to her and deferential to her – at first. This is why she says the thing she wants most is “a nice guy who will treat me right” Outstanding analysis
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/15 11:41 PM
1

Though not quite what you're after there's quite a lot of strategy around "rinsing" ie getting free stuff from men and society without having sex
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/15 11:23 PM
1

I was talking specifically about beta bucks with the inference being they don't have the game to spin plates but they do have the money for escorts
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/15 08:05 AM
1

This is one of the few topics of debate that women tend to be better than men
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/15 05:03 AM
1

That top comment is solidly funny though I wouldn't personally laugh at it. Credit where credits due.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/15 03:32 AM
2

Was not aware of this, are there any links?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/15 01:12 AM
5

My attitude is fine, feminists use the same shaming tactics to try to nudge people away from pre nup agreements, I get where it's coming from but I lol at the desperation and thinking you can make progress with anyone who thinks rationally about risk analysis.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/15 01:04 AM
1

It's more a precaution if future wife places sex embargo, r/deadbedrooms for reference. I'm not all of a sudden not entering into anything just because of the possibility of some future remote risk. What you're saying is the equivalent of "why look both ways if you could die crossing the road, just don't cross the road and you won't have problems."
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/15 12:56 AM
2

I would only use this if I was desperate to dread game. Lucky for me I know divorce law well in my country (law degree has perks) and can structure my shit so that I don't get raped in court
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/15 12:48 AM
1

Sure there are dumb ones there but there are also very smart people who happen to be subscribed. If you don't have the humility to admit that some people there are intellectually competent and possibly even smarter than you that signals to me that you're delusional and only seeing what you want to see.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/15 08:50 AM
1

So you made an obscure smarmy reference and when people didn't find it funny you concluded based off that RPers only laugh at jokes not made at their expense?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/15 08:48 AM
2

Do you have any links for what you find funny?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/15 08:45 AM
1

Browsing that sub makes me want to go to r/softbodies just for the eye bleach
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/15 05:06 AM
0

By that logic it's impossible for someone to laugh at a roast at a joke made at their expense. The more I read these responses from Bluepillers the more I have come to realise that they simply do not understand humour. That answers what this thread is about but it also means that the sidebar description is inaccurate.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/15 11:41 PM
3

But just to give you something to chew on, last thing to make me actually laugh was from the thread about married twerps being found out by their wives. One merp comments that after introducing red pill material to his wife, she's learned to start to control her shit testing. His wording amused me because it seemed like she was a super hero in training learning to control her powers. This is what I'm looking for. The humour component is fine but there is more to satire than merely linking to the…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/15 06:51 AM
14

Thank you for actually providing an example which is what this was supposed to be about
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/15 05:42 AM
7

No the only thing I'm looking for is humour which you appear to be unable to provide examples of. TRP content will never be satire anyway because most sensible people accept the principles as just how the world is anyway. The Daily Show I find funny as satire even if I would never in a million years vote left wing.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/15 03:35 AM
4

A bluepill thread that made you laugh is all I want
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/15 03:21 AM
6

Good humour at least to some degree transcends politics. I can get Bluepillers like u/GridreXX to admit a Chris Rock bit is hilarious even if it doesn't speak to her viewpoint on the sexual market place. If there isn't a single shred of r/thebluepill that's able to do the same that's enough evidence for me to realise that the satire guise is misplaced.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/15 03:20 AM
9

If I'm not mistaken r/theredpill doesn't call itself a "self improvement" sub in its sidebar nor have it in its first sentence. Aren't you avoiding the question by making an ad hom attack as well?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/15 03:12 AM
4

I've already heard one appeal to universal subjectivism in this thread which I responded to That's not the point of this thread nor is it accurate (imo - to say I find it "offensive"). Is there not a single comment or thread that's so funny in your view that it would be unreasonable for me to disregard it as not being so? I'm confident that if I showed that Burr clip to a random English speaking person they would at least find some semblance of humour to it even if it may not be their cup of tea…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/15 03:02 AM
9

That's a better worded way of stating what my opinion is of both pills
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/15 02:28 AM
0

Satire doesn't work like that but I get where you're coming from
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/15 02:27 AM
5

People use the fact that attraction is subjective to argue that there's no such thing as it being a relevant factor in career success. You can try to take a similar position here but that's pretty retarded in my view and also a bit of a cop out from my request. When someone says that something is funny they are doing more than just saying that they and only they in particular are expressing a subjective viewpoint. I don't mind you disagreeing but if you do I can't imagine you being much help in …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/15 02:21 AM
7

That's not the point of this thread nor is it accurate (imo - to say I find it "offensive"). Is there not a single comment or thread that's so funny in your view that it would be unreasonable for me to disregard it as not being so? I'm confident that if I showed that Burr clip to a random English speaking person they would at least find some semblance of humour to it even if it may not be their cup of tea. What's the r/thebluepill equivalent? If there isn't one why do they get to call themselves…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/15 02:04 AM
6

I cbf trawling through your six mile long history to find it but there are definitely comments there, I don't even care or think it's a bad thing but it is what it is
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/15 03:18 AM
5

Gotta disagree with you there u/happilysinglewoman is starting to make progress. Edit: Holy crap she's getting downvoted for talking about freedom of speech. If I wasn't banned I would stick up for her.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/15 12:54 AM
24

The thread on TBP about this really reveals their true colours. It's pretty much the same sub convergence with SRS SRD and Gamerghazi. What they want is moral thought policing and misogyny is their go-to anti-intellectual crusade to fall back on
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/15 09:15 PM
7

This is why pussy privilege is the most pervasive privilege of all
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/15 09:13 PM
6

Where did I mention STEM?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/15 01:06 PM
15

Didn't read all that but women get tingles for a man with status and money in that order, descending order. Don't blame men, blame women for who they choose to feel attracted to.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/15 12:45 PM
1

I'm a vegan who lifts and would crawl a mile through Anita Sarkeesians shit before ever referring to myself as a "bro". How on earth is a bluepill belle supposed to weed me out?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/15 10:57 AM
0

Hallelujah
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/15 02:53 AM
1

Thanks, there's also a study that wasn't published because it wasn't serious enough for an actual journal but a YouTube video was made out of it. I would have linked it but I can't find it anymore :(
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/15 10:50 PM
0

It's the same in terms of accuracy, it's just that it's much easier to disprove marxism as an economic ideology because of how obviously it fucks up the wellbeing of a country. There's more plausible deniability in the "social sciences" so it tends to thrive there but that's changing now as people with analytical backgrounds write papers on it as the one I linked does.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/15 08:11 PM
0

Incorrect, you don't identify as marxist probably because of how it is perceived by most people. The post modern social "scientists" that you probably know about rely entirely on marxism since that way they can ignore data that contradicts them, it's likely you just don't have any knowledge of that context. You're also factually wrong about me, I have graduate degrees in law and economics so I have to deal with this heterodox retardation constantly.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/15 07:49 PM
0

Hold up, you're a marxist AND a bluepiller? I don't think it's humanly possible to have such an unlikeable combination of beliefs.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/15 05:52 PM
9

I'm more purple pill than red pill but I have a background in economics and many concepts like alpha fucks, beta bucks, the wall, cock carousel, can be observed in terms of incentives. Here's a paper that supports that: http://assets.csom.umn.edu/assets/71503.pdf
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/15 02:10 AM
1

No. Feminists get themselves tangled up because even though they say they want equality they love and create gender roles at will for women not physically endangering themselves or being in harms way. They're never giving that up because it would be stupid to do so. Everyone at the end of the day should know how to and protect themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/15 02:02 AM
4

BP is right that redpill attracts the absolute filthy gutter of the Internet to their sub (white supremacists, conspiracy theorists, homophobes etc)
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/15 04:15 AM
0

The greatest times in my life were having sex and being in the company of my male friends. Those are two distinct experiences btw
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/15 04:13 AM
0

This post is a complete non issue then. True beta bucks are virgins before marriage. Your experience is probably low but isn't that bad at all
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/15 04:31 AM
1

Are you one? I got that impression from your post. If she already has a sizeable partner count and would never have given you the time of day when she was in her prime you can be sure these women are using you for beta bux.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/15 04:21 AM
2

You already know the answer to your questions. You should reward a virgin girl who holds out just for you and makes your relationship special rather than a carousel rider looking to leverage what remains of her SMV. Just my opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/15 03:52 AM
2

They have more potential to make something of themselves if they don't come from a high social standing. Women are almost guaranteed to have a comfortable, luxurious life but they're generally not able to change the world for the better or do something amazing
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/15 12:05 AM
40

When I see posts like these I wonder if the person is living on the same planet as I am. Here is an easy experiment for you to try out. Have a tinder profile of an obese male and an obese female. Swipe right on everything and see what the response rate is like. I think TRP overplays how thirsty very attractive men are but alpha need not equal attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/15 02:01 AM
7

He's beta and is hoping that you will make the first move. That way in his mind he can justify why he won't feel guilty about cheating on his girlfriend because someone else came onto him.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/15 01:04 PM
2

Inb4 an influx of posts on TwoX and TrollX from carousel riders going "ew some beta creep at a bar just touched me. I feel violated. What do I do now?"
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/15 06:47 AM
1

How much potatoes I give your father for hand in marriage?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/15 11:17 PM
1

Pink Dumbbells and 10,000 reps won't be as effective as a few reps with a lot of weight. You should try that you'll have an ass of the gods.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/15 02:07 AM
1

How much do you squat?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/15 01:09 AM
1

Need to start hitting the gym harder
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/15 08:56 PM
1

Chris Rock and Dave Chappelle say some pretty redpill things, do you find them funny?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/15 08:44 PM
1

What's your squat one rep max?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/15 08:37 PM
2

Have you thought about going vegan?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/15 08:27 PM
2

Most likely scarcity mentality. It's easy to forget that the majority of people don't think RP and tend to be feminized and beta and obedient. Works out well for women generally and I'm sincerely happy for your successful marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/15 07:08 AM
3

TRP is ok with men hurting their wives and girlfriends as long as they get what they want? yes because people don't love unconditionally. The reason why he took the trouble to approach you and make you his girlfriend is sex. It's up to you to consent or not consent to the relationship or his demands. You're not responsible for our high sex drives and I'm not responsible for your decisions. The other paragraph is basic theory. Look up what incentives are, it's what drives all of our actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/15 12:07 AM
6

Why do you say this? I am she, btw, and I don't believe in marriage for myself. many young women don't think about marriage. But when they reach their early 30's or late 20's they realise marriage is the best way to ensure stability in a child bearing relationship. I'm not convinced that you will be the exception to the rule Do you know why TRP advises young men to put dread in their relationships when there are these consequences? It's a tool for men to get what they want out of a relationship,…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/15 11:48 PM
2

Everything beta and everything women say they want in a man
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/15 11:41 PM
3

She could have ended the relationship or continued to refuse anal. I just have no sympathy for these cases at all. Young love is almost completely fatuous and I'm sure she'll get her "revenge" on whatever poor beta bucks she eventually married.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/15 11:37 PM
1

I thought the pre nup Tiger Woods had for adultery completely fucked him in his divorce settlement. I still think they are and can be very important
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/15 06:14 AM
10

You're probably the one BP-leaning poster I enjoy reading the most. Could I ask what you think about the bluepill sub?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/15 01:05 PM
11

There are basically comedians like Chris Rock, Dave Chappelle, Jim Jeffries speaking TRP truths before it was a thing. I think those guys are decent looking. The problem has already been told to you yet you choose to ignore it. You already want them to be ugly neckbeards because that makes it easier for you to dismiss them and that their ideas are fanciful. This coupled with the fact that the majority of men ~80ish% are unattractive to women unless their self worth makes up for it and it's easy …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/15 08:00 PM
-1

Learn to proofread. None of that makes any sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/15 12:13 PM
2

Wealth is fungible (or at least more so) compared to sexual autonomy. This is actually a good point I did not realise.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/15 08:31 AM
2

I think the fact that some Virgin men and men who have no other choice even though they do it begrudgingly prefer escorts to nothing at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/15 07:35 AM
6

Patrice O'Neal (RIP) was brilliant at dissecting this. He said a lot of the flashy shit that we buy like nice cars is only really to impress women. We would live in a a cardboard box if it meant we could regularly get laid in it. It seems to be more women who are interested in luxuriously adorned bungalows.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/15 07:13 AM
5

Surplus men in China would probably have to find brides in other countries. Definitely a ticking time bomb though.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/15 06:38 AM
5

Thank you for these posts. This is a fascinating insight into the mind of a Bluepiller
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/15 12:10 AM
2

I'd raise my daughters like I would have raised my sons. To show them that society coddles women so much that they never cultivate unique talents and end up less competitive than men. Similar to what happened with the Polgar sisters.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/15 12:46 AM
2

I'd rather have daughters than sons
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/15 12:31 AM
8

Came here from r/askreddit initially buying into the popular sentiment that TRP ideas are delusional and don't reflect the reality of the world. After sticking around and hearing from both sides I started to change my mind. I stay here because this is easily the most fascinating sub on reddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/15 05:48 AM
0

Damn you're quick. Beat me to the punch.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/15 04:21 AM
6

With posts like these they are much better at coming across smarter than TRP
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/15 10:11 PM
3

Libertarianism is about taking responsibility for your own actions and is the antithesis of what feminism is about. Under the collectivist marxism feminists advocate for they can use the government supported on the backs of beta males to pay for their birth control, abortions/accidents with Chad and paid maternity leave. Libertarians give none of these benefits.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/15 02:20 PM
1

Because unlike Machiavellian theories, which people find offensive in its own right, redpill goes further making claims about the fixed nature of women and contrasts them with men in a way that women find offensive. All people, you and I included, would rather believe a comfortable lie instead of an uncomfortable truth. Nothing surprises me about why women created bluepill or deny RP claims ferociously.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/15 04:06 AM
2

I'm sure there probably aren't scientific studies proving Machiavellian ideas like as a leader it is better to be respected than loved or that mercenary soldiers are untrustworthy and shouldn't be relied upon in favour of voluntary soldiers. A lot of this is just common sense and is observable in the world around us, if you choose that you find it offensive and don't want to believe it that's no skin off my back.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/15 12:11 AM
2

Feminism is unabashedly marxist in that they think through their feelings rather than on any objective data driven analysis like you see in orthodox biology or economics. That's why instead of feminism focussing on measurable ways that women are oppressed like the wage gap (debunked) or college rape (debunked) they now try to focus more on concepts that appeal to them emotionally like male gaze and sexual objectification. Much to my own resentment I have had the misfortune of being forced to rea…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/15 11:55 PM
1

Of course not but it is a somewhat realistic hyperbole reflecting the stupidity of the modern feminist reaction to news they find offensive.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/15 11:41 PM
1

Dictionary definitions aren't supposed to exhaustively lay out every aspect of meaning in a word but some exposition at least is helpful in describing some of what it is even if it is deficient in not explaining everything that it is. In my view the current definition of feminism does neither.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/15 12:21 PM
1

If feminists do not follow the dictionary definition of feminism then that definition no longer accurately describes what it is supposed to describe and is therefore wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/15 12:16 PM
1

Personally neither but I'd sooner get a puppy than a kitten.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/15 06:49 AM
6

Your comment has exactly zero relevance to my post and I can't see how it rebuts what I posted. I'm not even very redpill, I'm just relaying the conversations I'm having with my friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/15 02:21 AM
9

It can be. For example women almost never suggest anal sex but once they've tried it some women can't get enough of it. Throughout history I think practically every sexual kink invented was suggested by men who then needed to persuade women. The default position for women is always to say no initially then come around eventually.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/15 11:46 PM
7

That's not my experience, women tend to starfish in sex and it's usually the man who suggests experimentation. As long as she finds the guy sexually attractive the girl tends to do whatever he says given enough time and persuasion.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/15 11:34 PM
12

For your first question I don't really see how sluttiness or lack thereof have much to do with sexual fulfilment with a virgin. Most sexual relationships tend to start off with vanilla sex and then the guy through assertive suggestiveness can make a girl submit to all his other kinks. I don't agree with what I think you're implying which is that a woman who doesn't have any or a lot of sex will not be sexually adventurous. Secondly it's not like TRP is about denying women what they want. Indepen…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/15 11:21 PM
0

I don't think it's a good decision for women to marry real alpha males. They tend to be promiscuous and polygynous, not to mention selfish . If anything I think it's better for them to try to find an attractive beta male. Most RPW actually agree with me from what I've read. Sure pura alphas are bad LTR prospects but you're being naive (much more naive than the average RPW) if you're not able to see the point that what you truly want is a high value man to not be an asshole to YOU. In a looks bas…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/15 11:53 PM
1

I know about their theory so how do they know more than me ? He meant that they know more specifically about red pill strategies for women, being in a forum full of other women to share their ideas with. Sure I'll give you credit that you have a much better understanding about TRP than the average BPer in this sub but I don't think you know about strategies for women as well as LamiaQueen for example. I know about what men find attractive (I was probably the ultimate RPW in my previous relations…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/15 11:29 PM
1

I'm always on mobile so can never tell what the flair of a post is. I agree that comments like this should be removed though.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/15 06:56 PM
0

Your examples are completely off. The "normal looking" woman you posted is probs an ~7-8/10 and looks considerably older but still is as attractive to me as the "hot girl". Both of them are equally pursuable, a natural consequence of Pareto principle is that the majority of all types of women are sexually attractive to men. The irony of the argument you are making is in the multicultural area I live in homely looking indian and chinese women are completely fine being short term prospects to whit…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/15 12:36 AM
1

Dude read what you're saying and compare it to what I'm saying. We're on the same page already so none of what you wrote changed my view, at best it looks like I'm saying is that women proactively choose to differentially treat men rather than doing so subconsciously. Despite the way I put it I actually agree all along with your contention that it's much more based on instincts.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/15 01:58 PM
4

No I feel it would be much better to get some side pussy and use dread game to reignite activity rather than throwing in the towel with a divorce. Stability is important not just for yourself but for the children as well and divorce is a pain in a number of different ways.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 07:46 AM
13

The problem with BluePill is they dismiss the idea that all people are motivated to act via incentives and moreover they choose to believe when two conflicting versions are put forward to them the one that's less offensive to them rather than sincerely trying to uncover the truth. RedPill can get presumptuous at times but I'm more put off by their overall environment and don't identify with their goals for the most part.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/15 04:26 PM
8

Asserting a question begging conclusion (like TRP/Mens rights/GamerGate is not even worth engaging) is not a ubiquitous attitude in any debate and a mindset like this that doesn't mind resorting to fallacies isn't ubiquitous of good arguments. There's a difference in the fact that TRP doesn't resort to saying that TBP isn't even worth engaging even if they think TBP is wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 03:03 AM
10

Another thread reminding me why I'm purplepill, there's badeconomics, badphilosophy and badhistory in this thread and it's less than half an hour old.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/15 07:30 AM
1

Make it clear from the outset you're looking for someone to marry and offer your sex after its clear that he will follow through with marrying you. Most true high value men would much rather bang sluts first though.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/15 11:58 PM
2

Is this how you always were on this sub? somehow I imagined you being more of a feminist and more leaning towards TBP.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/15 01:12 AM
1

Then what on earth are you doing on the bluepill? That place is only a 24 hour circlejerk that reiterates feminist talking points
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/15 11:00 PM
1

If rape was decriminalised there is no doubt in my mind that there would be more rape, otherwise there would be no law outlawing it in the first place. Same with murder. I wouldn't say it is a natural urge of all men however, just that some men in particular lack impulse control.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/15 11:54 PM
3

If research is to be believed on the number of men unknowingly raising children not their own, Can you eli5 this? I don't understand how a situation like this could possibly play out in any other setting than Maurie. Won't the features of the baby be a dead giveaway? Isn't the arousal of suspicion during a supposedly monogamous time something that will lead to the truth coming out?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/15 10:05 PM
2

I read women's subs and there are posts flooding in of people going "so the weirdest thing happened while I was out at the club the other day. Some weird guy told me that my eye shadow was smudged, it was so strange because I checked and it seemed to be just fine. He started talking to me some more but then I walked away. Does anybody know what just happened?" This is enough of a culturally observed phenomena at this point of how TRP stereotypically game for it to be talked about.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/15 05:54 AM
0

Ethnically they're very similar
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/15 11:24 PM
4

Mods are doing a great job here
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/15 08:53 PM
2

Mentioning Elliott Hulse is bizarre to me. Apparently he has only had one sexual partner his entire life and that would be his wife that is many years his senior and doesn't look like the kind of person I would seek out hooking up with. Ironically I give much greater respect to everything that he says that doesn't relate to dating or relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/15 08:50 PM
1

I've lived dysfunctional family relationships but have not seen a dysfunctional friendship
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/15 02:11 PM
1

Meh none of the friendships I have or have ever observed have followed that route. I have gone through several stages of not knowing someone, acquaintances, being close friends, then no longer being friends due to a falling out and the maximum niceness is always humped in the middle where we were what I consider close friends. That's more than enough evidence for me to believe in that premise.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/15 12:02 PM
4

ding ding ding We have a basically observable fact about the world that Bluepillers will deny like their life depends on it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/15 11:56 AM
1

22 also
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/15 10:22 AM
1

Easily deductible from my post history. I'll give you the answer if you tell me why you want to hear it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/15 08:07 AM
6

The niceness is an irrelevant red herring since all friendships involve niceness. Basically a man struggling to find a relationship is told that whether they are friends with girls or whether they aren't friends with girls they can expect and should accept nothing even though at face value just hearing one of the statements tells them another pathway is available.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/15 12:17 AM
14

I haven't seen anyone saying that people shouldn't hit on each other in public. They only say that one must be respectful . I browse women's subs and have seen numerous instances where they get mad at men who "hit on me when I'm at the gym" or "hit on me while I'm walking to and from x and y" the point is that they only pull this out when low value men hit on men, they don't consistently apply to everyone. Nobody told you that you shouldn't improve yourself. Use TRP advice, do whatever the hell …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/15 12:09 AM
7

If I was in that situation I would play the beta role but get her to give up the pussy before marriage and then decide to get cold feet before tying the knot. Those kind of girls just aren't suitable for LTR's.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/15 10:51 AM
1

Oh I'm not American either but I assume everyone on Reddit is so I thought I would ask this since I know a bit about their domestic politics. If you're European what are your thoughts on the economic austerity policies that the so called PIIGS countries are experiencing?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/15 07:46 AM
1

What are your political views?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/15 07:38 AM
3

This is a really fantastic post. Though I would disagree with the idea that people only attack the groups who are perceived to be at the top. Plenty of people make fun of "white trash", plenty of people make fun of fat chicks especially men in the context of hooking up with them. In my view it is politically correct to bash those at the top and not those who have it rough irrespective of how worthy of ridicule they are which is why in the public eye that tends to happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/15 01:05 AM
1

Is question for all an option? That's what I prefer
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/15 12:51 PM
1

Well if opinions are contrasted with facts, the title is a fact about my subjective experience, since it doesn't try to generalise from that I'm not so sure it counts as my opinion for the purposes of modding. Is it too late to fix it by adding a question mark at the end?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/15 12:31 PM
1

Because I'm making an observation of how something appears to me rather than trying to convince everyone to think like me and the title is phrased subjectively.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/15 12:04 PM
2

I agree with this. I should have differently worded the title to have discussion and regret not doing so in light of some of the good comments being deleted.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/15 09:08 PM
2

I've never in my life subscribed or posted on TRP and identify as purple pill. The rest of what you wrote is incoherent gibberish but I just wanted specifically to address that.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/15 02:50 PM
12

Thanks for the history lesson. Do you have any examples of women being legally treated differently to men when the year number didn't start with 18-? In the modern climate the law does not treat women any differently to men and that's certainly never been what feminism has used up its political activism for. You're welcome to keep the red herrings coming, this will be the last one I respond to.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/15 01:28 PM
4

Idk you might have the libido of an average woman, it could definitely happen. Apart from that you sound pretty fem, even with the post you just wrote.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/15 11:25 AM
2

Sure he would probably more like to settle down with his gastronomic significant other but that's irrelevant to the point I'm making. If he was able to hypothetically hook up with a woman in a bar on the way to committing suicide the immediacy of the validation he would feel would be so great as to make him change his mind. Here's what women (I'll assume you're a woman) don't understand about men. Especially If you're beta you don't even get the luxury of planning in advance the minute character…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/15 11:06 AM
3

I am alone. While I do have friends, and we do hang out, and we are still close, I've ceased to be of any importance in anybody's life. Everyone has a family now. Everyone's moving on. They have less time for me now, we don't relate to each other as well, out interests don't match up, and so on. You didn't say this initially. Well in that case this sounds like loneliness, if not now then especially so in the future based on the current trajectory.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/15 09:42 AM
2

Thanks for sharing your perspective, I hope it gets voted to the top of the thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/15 09:39 AM
2

While not experiencing intimacy sucks (I know what it's like) I don't see it as loneliness. In your situation if you suddenly made a lot more friends, went out a lot more frequently and to exciting places but still didn't hook up I think you would remain in the same predicament. Someone in your situation if you are who you say you are is extremely desirable to a huge swath of people, I'm sure and I hope you'll find someone instead of committing suicide.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/15 09:34 AM
4

This post reminds me why I'm purple pill
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/15 09:02 AM
6

What's equally sad is that card-carrying feminists like Amanda Marcotte will (or would if he was alive) twist that around and make the dude out to be the bad guy for some asinine reason like "him feeling entitled to sex" or bullshit like that. But then again, the woman has even less of a soul than Ann Coulter, so... Ugh I looked her up just now. She's absolutely vile.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/15 08:04 AM
19

Feminists do have equal rights. All rights are laid out in the constitution and apply equally to all people regardless of race or sex. It's only when freshman college students start reading about communism and get brainwashed by Marxist feminist dialectic that they are suddenly deluded into thinking they don't have equal rights to others. Until "feminists" realise this they are going to have to accept their victim based ideology creates nut jobs. Some are crazier than others but the shade of gre…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/15 07:24 AM
4

Nail on the head, that's what makes me get frustrated at the people after the event pouring out the sympathy and condolences. They want all the unearned superiority of looking like they ever cared about the guy even if they all collectively played a role in his decision.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/15 06:58 AM
14

I would say that all of the issues in his suicide note come down to one thing: loneliness. This is just not true. This person was well known in his field, had numerous professional relationships with others and immediate close friends that commented on his death. I don't consider myself lonely but he certainly appeared to have more friends than me. One hook up at a bar would have given this guy enough validation to want to keep living, every man who sees this story innately knows that. That's pr…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/15 06:09 AM
16

It's important to point out that women are incapable of having empathy for a mans unique issues because feminism states that ALL gender related problems in the world relate to patriarchy and therefore that they and only they (no pesky misogynist MRA's) can address them. TRP are individualists and never put themselves in a position where they could be scrutinised for their lack of empathy for a women's unique problems. They do know at the very least however that TRP works for them to achieve thei…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/15 05:04 AM
2

Red pillers: Is there anything women are better at than men? yes, they appear to be much better at getting multi million dollar divorce settlements. No but seriously I would say they are much better with social media than men. They take better photos, present themselves in more flattering ways and create wider networks with more people in their orbit. All very important in the new digital age.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/15 10:54 AM
2

Would you willingly get pump and dumped with ~5 A-list celebrity crushes though?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/15 06:14 AM
17

I would argue not (I'm a man), men and women are equally incapable of empathising with the unique tribulations that only men and only women face. I realised this when I went I went to a bar wearing a toga for a party with no underwear underneath. At the bar as I was standing waiting for a drink I didn't notice a middle aged woman carefully lifting up the cloth and straight up ogling me. Once I noticed I laughed, she smiled and I walked away after getting my drink. It didn't bother me one bit and…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/15 10:44 AM
1

I'm more purple pill than red pill so agree with a lot of this. However I would ask did you have children or did you plan to conceive naturally when you got married? That in my view would probably be the biggest driver for women to have a stable partner and compromise attraction and love to get to that.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/15 12:33 AM
0

Did you see the link? Her examples do nothing to address my argument. There are outliers in all data, what I care about is the trend. Your real life examples have no control and therefore reveal nothing about relative preferences. It's like saying "my wife doesn't and never wanted to go to Paris for our honeymoon, I know this because I took her on a camping trip and she said she had a blast." You can win this argument very easily. Show me data like I did that shows a mans preference for women th…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/15 12:25 AM
3

It seems as if you're trying to split the discussion. The point I want to make is that a woman is at her peak sexual attractiveness to a male is when she's young. If a woman finds her sexual attractiveness to a man she's married to not diminish by age as much that has a direct impact on male vs female libido in a long term sexual relationship. Being happy with your wife, pointing to doting older spouses, and pointing out that men don't cheat with younger women (this is debatable) are all irrelev…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/15 11:06 PM
1

I should have linked to this in the OP but I'll link it here. http://i.imgur.com/Ijgzwsk.png The problem with TRP is trying to view the world in terms of black and white. They take complex issues, like human sexuality, and reduce it to catch phrases. That post wall woman might be super sexy to her man. He might be the most handsome man in the world to her. Sex with a loving partner can be the best. TRP won't acknowledge any thing that doesn't fall into TRP parameters. The bolder part is wishful …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/15 10:50 PM
1

>People are impressionable, go figure. But explain to me how it's wrong of me to straw-man a straw man. What I'm getting at is that women who believe in patriarchy are more comfortable ascribing negative traits to men as a result of that rather than trying to figure out how they think. That's how individual feminists tend to vilify men in case by case relationship instances which is something you disputed above. I don't even know if you're following this line of reasoning and where it's going. >…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/15 02:49 AM
2

Where does this idea come from that feminism is concerned with case-by-case relationship issues of people who are either just not compatible with each other or are too dull to engage in simple communication and problem solving... Thank you for sincerely attempting to CMV but I think you're strawmanning it a little bit. It's not a stretch to imagine that the women who are inculcated with the notion of patriarchy begin to resent all men more and more once they see individual cases of men being ass…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/15 01:06 AM
0

As explained in another comment I think TRP would explain the relationship dynamics that are going on, ie who has the power and how and why they're exercising it in the way that they are doing. They would also put men on a spectrum, if you want to have sex with someone like Harry Styles who probably has plates on speed dial don't expect him to pamper and pay attention to your needs like Mr Right-in-front-of-you-all-this-time can. They would implicitly tell her to prioritise what she wants to pri…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/15 12:54 AM
0

I think TRP would explain the dynamics of what's going on and direct her to RPW if what she's into is a long term relationship with a quality boyfriend who cares about her orgasms.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/15 12:07 AM
1

Nah not worth the 20 comment chain goose chase go piss someone else off
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/15 05:28 AM
1

Both cheating on a beta provider with an alpha and choosing a beta provider in the first place and treating them differently to previous alpha hook ups involve choosing to treat people badly. I just don't think it's that obvious that women choose to do that even if it's beneficial for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/15 10:54 PM
1

I'm not too sure about this myself and I'm not sure I agree with TRP even though I mostly lean that way. A heterosexual female is capable of being sexually very attracted to her homosexual male friend but those friendships end up faring better than a heterosexual male attracted to a heterosexual female friend who wants nothing of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/15 02:30 AM
1

I disagree. For example i intuitively understood alpha fucks beta bucks before TRP but it was only after TRP that I understood how hamstering works wherein a feminist would describe someone who does this as "exploring herself" and "finally understanding where her priorities lie and getting with mr right who was in front of her all this time".
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/15 12:59 AM
0

There are plenty of anti-women journalists, radio personalities and TV hosts in Australia. It's good to see a differing viewpoint, honestly. Feminism doesn't have anywhere near the stranglehold on social/political discourse that you seem to think it does. if this is the case would you be able to link me to one such personality? An example would be someone who may agree with some of the things Jeffries has to say regarding women or someone who wouldn't treat his act as misogynistic? First you sai…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/15 08:25 AM
-1

Thanks for responding although I would prefer you to have answered the question in the title. In Melbourne, the comedy festival gets high profile coverage. People loved this guy, hated this show, thought this chick was cool... politics bleeds into that. We take our comedy seriously, but not so much feminism. This kind of article isn't exactly the norm. What I'm getting at is feminist viewpoints always get high profile coverage whether it be the LA Times, New York Post, The Telegraph and so forth…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/15 02:55 AM
11

Jesus Christ if this is the experience of a 42 year old person given male levels of testosterone just imagine what it would be like to experience having the mindset of a hormonal teenage boy. To me it seems that it's not like women or feminists are bad people for not being able to empathise with a man in the sexual market place. They're just fundamentally incapable of having that empathy and I don't think it's their fault.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 11:10 PM
7

Christina Hoff Sommers has a really good discussion on this. My view is that as long as freedom from being discriminated against is guaranteed under the constitution and that constitution is applied there is no need for any identity politics activism. Feminism realised this and then went into full Marxist territory where the things they were complaining about became nebulous and impossible to define. They also over decades created their own language of made up terms that meant you couldn't debat…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 10:55 PM
0

Could I just ask a question as far as circle jerking is concerned? I remember reading posts recently such as "women don't buy dogs because they might get male dogs which hump their legs and that's rape culture" and in response to a bot using the word triggered "oh no you triggered me now, this is outrageous" Those posts are clearly circle jerky but I genuinely thought they were pretty funny. Are they posts which are candidates for deletion? And bans? Does it matter how funny they are? Maybe a mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 10:31 PM
4

To say that women are objectified when used as plates doesn't make sense in isolation because you also have to take into account all relationships that people enter into selfishly. As a result I think we should avoid using that description altogether.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 04:51 AM
6

I might as well be reading War and Peace
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/15 10:17 PM
3

O rly? What about employment recruiters who go around college campuses emphasising how important good social skills and a personality are while also saying top tier grades are a pre-requisite knowing full well the profile of people who fit under the first criterion are completely different to the profile of people who fit under the second criterion? People can prefer whatever they want even if it is lofty. The same girl by definition can't have slept with 0 and 100 men at the same time but withi…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/15 08:11 PM
3

To my knowledge that happens only in countries who operate under sharia law in Northern Africa and the Middle East. However there are so so many small-ish tribes that anthropologists study around the world that shame promiscuity that don't go full retard by slaughtering them. It's worth noting that in these sharia law countries homosexuality and transsexuality face similar punishments. The society is violent in general and I hardly think there is anything causative over their uneasiness over a w…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/15 08:00 PM
4

ok, what year did things become fair enough for your capitalism solves everything statement to be accurate? do you acknowledge the need for the civil rights movement in speeding up changes in an unjust society? Pinning it down to an exact year may be difficult since I think society moved gradually to the meritocratic egalitarianism I believe we live with now. It's hard because not only does society need to change but people need to grow into adults for that change to have any effect. I'd be happ…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/15 07:55 PM
12

you mean eventually like in a few generations? because that's how long it took black baseball players to be fairly represented talent wise. and it would have taken longer without the civil rights movement. If you really want to go down this road at least try to come up with something that's happening now or at least recently. It's just lazy reasoning on your part trying to box me into a corner by presupposing that we live in the same world now that we did before the civil rights revolution. so y…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/15 07:27 AM
10

Really couldn't care less. If your partner is attractive and std free, the only deterrent I can imagine is one's own insecurity to "live up to" partners 1-82. If that's how you feel about chastity so be it, at least you get market power since the SMP is inundated with women "finding themselves" in their 20's. The short and sweet is: bad ideas spread if they go unchecked. Bad ideas in the wrong hands = big yikes. Meh I can see why you would say this but I strongly disagree. Forgetting all the ana…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/15 06:56 AM
14

Idk bro, I think that unemployed law student gets a sliver of that burden. here's where I differ with most of the liberal leaning people of reddit, cream always rises to the top at least eventually. That's the joy of capitalism but why tho A point of departure between RPers and BPers. My physical attraction increases for a woman who chooses not to have sex so i t is in my intererest. BPers don't seem to care about the possibility of being Mr #83. I agree? I don't care about the wellness of racis…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/15 04:47 AM
14

This is why arguing with BPers is one of the most frustrating things a person can do. You guys all come up with tangential non sequiturs filled with hidden premises that takes too much effort to unpack. First of all they are not at all analogous. If a law firm declines a brilliant black law student because they're racist they incur all the burden of their own stupidity. Preferring chastity is a near universal preference among men which always is in their best interest. Now if someone doesn't ass…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/15 04:12 AM
3

Yes you can replace the end bit with "making love at home". That was a deliberate change of tone to make fun of how ridiculous it would look if RPers adopted the same language euphemisms BPers use.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/15 03:00 AM
26

I agree with a lot of this but it goes both ways. If someone chooses to ride the cock carousel and feminists try to shame a beta to "man up" and accept her promiscuity don't try to use euphemistic language to dodge what's actually going on. What I'm rebelling against is the tendency of Bluepillers to dress up what everyone intuitively knows is a turd. Redpillers by contrast are much more open and frank about what they do which makes them better at least in this regard. The issue is asserting tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/15 02:03 AM
5

I'm not sure if you're joking, trolling, or gloating over what is actually a pretty poor analogy. I have to confess that this is outside of my personal experience because my friends aren't fighters and I generally avoid conflict. On the other hand I have seen in my time many a drunken hook up at camps, clubs and parties. My intuition that tells me that a few things might be going on in these pub brawls, (i) some guys truly do want to get into random fights because they fancy their chances and li…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 12:41 PM
-1

Post menopausal women can ideally only hope for sex with someone who they have a LTR with. That way the man can dim the lights and pretend that she looks the same as she did in her prime. Playing the dating game based on the physical attraction you delude yourself into thinking you still have can only lead to tears imo.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 03:00 AM
3

It's the same principle as why someone who earns a million dollars a year votes for the right leaning party even if he disagrees with the ideology because they'll lower his taxes or vice versa. My central premise does conflate TBP with feminism and someone gave a reasonable answer why that ideology is advantageous to women. I think in just the same way RP is beneficial to men. Feminism encompasses a lot of things which are advantageous to women, but a large section of it is maximizing their mean…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/15 08:18 PM
0

Low SMV men find TRP appealing and low SMV women find TBP appealling. The majority of people in the world have low SMV.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/15 10:06 AM
1

Common sense
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/15 07:23 AM
5

You could be Internet famous if you claim those on urban dictionary
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/15 04:47 AM
1

I completely agree that demographic showcased in that sub entirely consists of straight up douches. However I remain doubtful that they can ever have the clout in a relationship to be abusive. I'm talking about the blind almost irrational looking attraction a woman has to an abusive partner. The type of relationship where you hear rationalisations like "oh you would never understood, it's just complicated" or "idk love is just a really weird thing, you can't help but go back to the person who th…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/15 10:54 AM
4

What? Since when is someone who can have casual sex at will without commitment (my definition of alpha) automatically affiliated with TRP? My post isn't about all RPers beating their partners but whether or not abusive relationships can happen when the woman is with a beta male.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/15 09:26 AM
0

This study really has something for everybody. TRP comes out as most bigoted whereas SRD with its ideological tentacles in a lot of subreddits (including, prominently TBP) comes out as one of the most toxic, and easily the most toxic if you count actual influence on the reddit community (opieandanthony is hardly mainstream). Plenty for both sides to spin either way they want to show how shitty the side they disagree is.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/15 10:38 PM
1

I'm not sure, I still think that even though that gay man doesn't experience sexual scarcity and wants a committed relationship, he will only get to that place after having a higher amount of casual sex than heterosexuals (because of access) and lesbians (because of mentality). Most people settle down eventually, I will never dispute that. However getting back on topic a mans relative enthusiasm for no strings attached sex will always make him unlikely to be in a situation of "fuck zone" ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/15 11:31 PM
1

Well gay men have far more casual sexual encounters than heterosexual men and women who in turn have far more casual sex encounters than gay women. I don't have a source for that but I'm sure you can find data backing that up if you google. Regardless of your anecdotes that would indicate to me that men enthusiastically give out sex without commitment in contrast to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/15 06:30 PM
1

PPD swung me from someone who was previously neutral/BP to now neutral/RP so I think there is value in trying to make high quality posts on this sub
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/15 02:06 AM
2

What your friend was reacting to was not a fuckzone but scarcity. He knows you could go out and get another dick the next night but he won't be able to go out and get more pussy as easily. He would rather have a sure thing than risk loneliness. If you had told him that even though you were leaving he would be able to have his pickings from the local modelling agency he would be crying tears of joy instead. I feel like a lot of people particularly Bluepillers don't get this point, that's why I an…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/15 10:20 AM
3

I'll concede that in the film the fallible narrator aspect distorts our view about Summer and that she did in fact look for a casual relationship. I forgot that about the movie analysis. Everything I see around me points differently to what you're saying. Look at Tinder if you don't believe me. You would think that this dating app would remain now as it was conceived which was pure "perfect stranger" sex based on looks. That would presuppose that men and women see sex the exact same way but Tind…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/15 01:46 AM
1

question for the mods, is someone able to circumvent rule 7 of the subreddit by making a non-neutral sounding post on a neutral sounding subtitle?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/15 11:38 PM
2

Wtf is delta, it is a friend zone because the women chooses not to escalate the relationship, that's the choice she's exercising. In the same way a fuck zone is a choice a man is exercising. She also subtly can keep the man dangling by coming off as flirtatious and more friendly than she does with friends she's completely platonic. None of this is obvious but it keeps the dynamic going of the man offering more and more of himself and getting nothing in return despite pining for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/15 08:38 PM
3

This is off topic but do you know how to quote with indentations on iPad? I've still not figured it out and it's frustrating. Anyway onto what you said. There are two scenarios here, if a woman finds herself in an 80/20 scenario she is in the fuck zone and that's absolutely the mans discretion because that's all he's willing to give and has other options. In the 500 days of summer scenario the real life story it's based on is a man of relatively lower SMV than the woman (it happens but rarely). …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/15 08:32 PM
1

Before I deleted my facebook I would literally see examples of the friendzone all the time. Maybe not financial security (at my age) but men are used as emotional tampons all the time there, I feel like maybe you're not looking hard enough. The example of a man who showers a women with praise and compliments every time she posts a photo or status update is a friend zone if he secretly pines for something from her he'll never get, at the same what the man provides the woman is extremely useful so…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/15 07:27 PM
3

The movie did involve a man who develops feelings for a woman who ditches him for someone else while providing sex for him. However RP theory concedes that that can and will happen if a woman finds a man of higher value and is incentivised to jump ship. Saying she fuck zoned him might then be accurate to say if you take a look at what happened but not if you understand the motives. The screenwriter who wrote the screenplay isn't particularly attractive or high earning so it's easy to imagine thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/15 07:04 PM
0

If a man is that much out of your league the dynamic changes. I think most women due to princess culture truly don't think the man they're casually dating might be someone above their league but realise innately why they shouldn't give it up easy. That happens often enough to make the majority of cases and therefore is generalisable enough for my original post to make the assumption.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/15 06:50 AM
1

People like you go fundamentally potato brain debating something in which their own personal interest is at stake. I'm not going to respond to any of your points because they all come from a place of speciesist prejudice and discrimination which I don't think you've ever in your life bothered to consider or justify. You don't have to worry about me taking your ribs, I really don't care about other people's choices.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/15 06:42 AM
1

Obv an unrealistic alpha in that situation has enough leverage on you to be able to do that on you. I'm talking about the common experience that most women feel casually dating in college. Due to their hypergamy they will always want to go after men slightly above their league but they know that if they give it up too soon the man may leave. That's a complete explanation for why woman are hesitant to have sex and why they get annoyed if a guy comes on too strong. One wrong mistake in their mind …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/15 06:34 AM
1

I think the conversation is still useful because it helps to settle if one gender is more oppressed than the other, it also helps to see matters from someone else's perspective
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/15 04:57 AM
6

Men who firmly know they're in the friend zone but proceed regardless get little sympathy from me, less sympathy than the woman who just finds out they're in the fuck zone. If the extent to which they zone themselves is equal neither party is pitiable.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/15 03:19 AM
3

I didn't understand what you meant initially. You don't have to justify anything to anyone if you don't want to. The point of ethics is that most people think a life worth living is a life in which you're a good person. You're actions are good or bad independently of any person you're trying to justify them to. However when I used to justify I meant to myself
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/15 07:40 AM
2

Mostly themselves if you want my opinion. The official audience is other philosophers who read journals
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/15 05:35 AM
0

Maybe it's just my area. I have noticed ever since high school people being increasingly stratified in their friend groups. Where I'm from women also date almost exclusively out of mutual friends
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/15 03:59 AM
3

Well your first mistake is going full retard by getting a degree in philosophy rather than using some of the basic concepts that aren't common sense as a tool in other areas. If you think that academics writing papers on human rights, climate change or corporate finance is "useless fluff" that indicates me that you aren't knowledgeable enough to have relevant opinions on important topics
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/15 03:56 AM
3

I am actually graduating with a law degree this year (law is undergrad here) and am probably going to go into post grad economics as well. By any account I'm highly educated in a variety of disciplines, if that's enough for you to want to ignore what I have to say it's no skin off my back
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/15 03:52 AM
0

The idea of a beta transforming into an alpha or even to raise himself above his current level of beta sounds absurd to me. To me homophily necessitates that high value men have social circles with other high value men. This is the easiest way a woman can know who's worth pursuing but I don't see a high value group accepting a beta easily if they know about his awkward past as a beta.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/15 02:51 AM
3

Were your ancestors ever owned as slaves? There is a directness and a simplicity to the might is right approach but it's not something that appeals to me personally. Coincidentally your post is the problem I see with general members of the public who shouldn't be involved in government policy, the implications are large enough that the work has to be done by academics only.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/15 02:14 AM
1

That's a pretty interesting story. I think it re-enforces to me why you come across as cynical as you do from reading your posts. Btw It's mostly the feelz women pushing those sentimental slaughterhouse videos. The reason I had to change is because I like logic too much.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/15 08:47 AM
3

Lol you're woefully misinformed and this is coming from someone who agrees with RP. The consensus as it stands among anthropologists is that early humans were sexually egalitarian. Our closest ancestors aren't chimps as this video posits but Bonobos who are anything but divided on alpha/beta lines. This was just entertaining pop infotainment, if you take it more seriously than that you're a sucker
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/15 08:10 AM
0

You're arguing like a bluepiller by allowing your offence at what I have to say from preventing you getting my argument. You're also putting words into my mouth. I used veganism because it's relevant to me but there are other topics that come under the umbrella of being socially acceptable but morally deviant to at least some people. Let's take another example of tax evasion and forget what both of us have to say on the matter. Let's say you happen to be rich and your tax lawyer rearranges your …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/15 07:46 AM
0

To deny that BP is united in holding that they don't want people to be manipulative is disingenuous. Dirtbaggishness is in everyone but this is about isolating for the effects of RP.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/15 07:19 AM
0

But a BPer can go their mating strategy is "be nice and don't be deceitful", that's their philosophy not only for mating but probably for all human interactions. They can then argue if you want a larger slice of the dating pie what if you want also a larger slice of all other human interaction pies? Also what if that happens subtly without you even noticing? There's no pretence for a BPer being scummy to this clients but there might be for a RPer
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/15 07:00 AM
2

Posts like this reaffirm my belief that RPers don't have everything as figured out as they would like to believe. Try to come up with an argument justifying animal products. I did at one point. Everything has been debunked, there is no justification which is why all the leading ethicists like Peter Singer, Christine Korsgaard and Tom Regan all concede ethically to veganism. There are some fringe philosophers who have made attempts to justify animal use but they all so far have been laughably bad
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/15 06:44 AM
4

That's an interesting perspective though one I ultimately disagree with. I think I would argue that RP "humanises" animals by explaining our mating based on their behaviour which could ultimately make us empathise with them and see them as more than just chattel or resources, which is something I would welcome. As a male though it's frustrating to see paleo seen as masculine and veganism being lead mostly by females
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/15 06:35 AM
1

I'll ignore the rest of your post since I obviously disagree but that discussion is irrelevant to this topic. Regarding this "The red pill wants to accept people the way they are, without idealizations". I'm not sure the way people are is as manipulative as the way the red pill will make them. Let's say we ignore veganism completely. If we have a regular old lawyer like I'm soon to be, and I start taking in RP. What if I decide because of RP to be narcissistic and manipulative by overcharging a …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/15 06:26 AM
0

So would you say that everything involved with RP is independent of morality? because regardless of how you act, a females manipulation is taken as constant.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/15 06:18 AM
0

I feel like just saying you have morals and being Red Pill could just be paying lip service to both though, almost like hamstering in a weird way. Let's say you're the kind of person to blow through what you think is last minute resistance or deliberately mislead a girl into thinking you will commit to get sex you're putting yourself above the interests of the girl in a way that offends social mores. I think if you're the kind of person who will do that why would you remotely give a shit about a…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/15 06:15 AM
0

Edit: tldr why would you do something you think is moral (treating animals) when your guiding RP philosophy tells you generally to follow your self interest instead. I still think my paragraph is relevant but whatever.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/15 04:35 AM
3

Oh, that really explains everything. Thanks for the answer
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/15 09:47 AM
2

On that topic could I ask are you a really fem guy or just a lesbian woman? I'm reading your history and I'm currently leaning 30:70 but the uncertainty is killing me
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/15 09:15 AM
1

You were this close to making me like you, nice job ruining it
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/15 08:57 AM
2

A bluepill viewpoint I can agree on internet high five
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/15 08:26 AM
6

I agree with the spirit of this post but not the analysis. Feminists are interested in all sorts of issues that seem insignificant and tangential to their cause because it upsets the narrative that they'd like to push. In this case, the main sticking point is sexual dimorphism. It's very important that they push the idea that a woman can do "literally" everything a man can. If there are objective ways that men are seen differently to women science is then allowed with society's approval to inves…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/15 08:21 AM
4

That's actually pretty heart-breaking, reminds me of the film Up.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/15 07:55 AM
1

This analysis fails in todays globalised online society because there are no more regional monopolies. If a woman wants a date she can just as easily go on Tinder and be swamped with interest in the globalised market place if the gender ratio at her college forces her into a low SMV man
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/15 04:13 AM
1

If the advances are repeated that would constitute harassment and is already outlawed I believe. You've so far done nothing to prove to me that women are anywhere close to being oppressed at any level in society but made a lot of progress in solidifying my idea that bloopers have no inhibitions spewing out multiple shitty arguments hoping to get something to stick. Unless you come up with something decent now I'm done here.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/15 12:15 PM
1

"Health" "safety" what do either concepts have to do with undesired courtship? I've already explained why I think the argument is tenuous
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/15 12:01 PM
1

Because he theoretically views her as a 10, nothing tops her. Why would he deviate from perfection if he has it. If emma was into him as well that would be a LTR, this dynamic doesn't play out with what he subjectively sees as a 7 because he can improve by getting more 7's. He can't get more 10's since only one 10 in his mind exists. I feel like we're going in circles and rehashing things so I'm ending this here.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/15 02:21 PM
1

I would accept this but also argue if the male's SMV drops noticeably the woman would do the same thing. If you marry a 9 then let yourself go and get fat you can expect her to start looking elsewhere. The thing is that a mans SMV in practice doesn't decline with age. Although the theory in my view obv still holds with the genders reversed. The celebrities you speak of are the cream of the crop so they would never settle for a ONS with someone higher than their value because no one exists higher…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/15 02:03 PM
1

Yes you did, I skimmed that which was an error. I would add as a caveat to what we agree with though that in a LTR if a females SMV drops noticeably and a man maintained his there's still scope for cheating which makes a mans experience different to a females experience. Define "celebrities" and "easily". I would argue, by and large, even for him, no. The hierarchies of beauty and being so sought after by multiple different types of male attractiveness means it's not like he can pick them out of…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/15 01:32 PM
1

You could have saved a lot of e-ink by conceding that given a choice males pick ONS and then based on prerogative possibly go for a LTR but only eventually. I don't think you understand my point in that example Prince Harry would rather marry Emma Watson because she's a snowflake 10 rather than because he introspectively wants an LTR. If the girl was a 7 which is dime a dozen for him a LTR would be out of the question
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/15 01:19 PM
1

Yes the celebrity does have a choice and I don't think you've successfully rebutted my arguments for the position that they choose the ONS, they may eventually choose to LTR but only after first choosing ONS and only when they decide that they've had enough of ONS. Even if they choose LTR it's not conclusive unless they continue to choose LTR once the females SMV declines. As for your second point I disagree because our society generally self selects women into hierarchies of beauty. The reason …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/15 01:07 PM
2

Sorry for being nit picky but I feel like you're changing the topic slightly. The original premise i thought we were arguing is "whether or not men who have the option to have casual sexual encounters with multiple beautiful women in favour of a steady long term relationship with one woman who isn't necessarily more attractive than those women". It's fully possible in my view to get married within that theory because a man can decide that he's had enough of the casual sexual encounters after alr…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/15 12:50 PM
2

My view is that celebrity marriages inevitably end in divorce because a man can maintain his smv longer which in shallow tinsel town leads to cheating, I think most of the general public is with me on this one as well. I also think you're approaching this the wrong way, you don't look at young Justin Timberlake types who just got married but the old guys to see if they not only chose a long term relationship but continued to choose it
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/15 12:28 PM
1

I'm glad you brought this up since this is a huge sticking point between what i see as predominantly feminist leaning women and predominantly non feminist leaning men. The state in western liberal democracies protects in the constitution freedom from discrimination and has laws set up to punish physical violence. This covers all bases that men think are important, everything else is fair game and up to the employer. If you think that the it's up to the state to regulate office politics and small…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/15 12:23 PM
2

I fucking love this sub, sometimes (often imo) the blue team loses but then other times the red team gets smashed. This is more entertaining than sports
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/15 12:06 PM
2

Unless there is some study that even attempts to investigate "whether or not men who have the option to have casual sexual encounters with multiple beautiful women in favour of a steady long term relationship with one woman who isn't necessarily more attractive than those women" lived experience and "projecting" is all you, or I, or anyone else has. However if you're skeptical about this I would ask you to think about the men who are renowned for their sustained high smv like Marlon Brando, John…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/15 11:51 AM
2

I just re-read the original post and realised that person was advocating compliance as opposed to what I thought from skimming which was "guys will ask you out, you just gotta accept it's annoying and say no". The textbook answer obviously is that if you're skilled and in demand the market will sustain your employment and reward you with a wage that reflects that which basically amounts to "say no and call their bluff that they will somehow harm your career for rejecting them". I realise however…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/15 11:24 AM
2

Completely off topic but the exhibitionism and the underlying need for approval and validation of physical attractiveness that goes on unspoken in that subreddit annoys the shit out of me
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/15 11:06 AM
2

I personally think this is just comes as part of the package of minor advantages and disadvantages that all men and women receive respectively, doesn't meet my threshold of oppression. However from the girls I've talked to a ring on woman's ring finger acts as an extremely effective scarecrow for cases that become unbearable.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/15 10:49 AM
1

Holy shit, I'm late to this but this is the post of the century. Insightful, impartial, investigative, just everything you want and need it to be
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/15 08:10 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter