TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

sumzup Archive

View 0 posts and 75 comments by sumzup on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

Apparently not http://i.imgur.com/fKIiG.png
/r/MensRights28/08/12 06:34 PM
7

I think /r/Mensrights is concerned more about whether the same outcome would have happened if genders were swapped (something up for debate, I'm sure) than about the correctness of the actual verdict. Not that I disagree with you on the latter point.
/r/MensRights07/12/11 10:30 AM
5

Misogyny. Yes it is here, it is not "rampant" as most people would like to admit (but those mix it with the WBB posts would disagree) but the fact that we have little to no censorship outside of upvoting/downvoting lets misogyny come to the top from a handful of people from time to time, and it really doesn't make us look good. In my experience, misogyny is usually downvoted or adequately responded to. It's a shame that the few exceptions negatively color many peoples' perceptions of this subred…
/r/MensRights03/06/11 04:33 PM
4

It also probably prevents a lot of otherwise bitchy helicopter mothers from freaking out and running to bother the first official looking person they see. In fact, the sign was probably put up because this kind of problem.
/r/MensRights30/01/11 09:47 PM
6

Author is named Ann Thrope -> Miss Ann Thrope -> misanthrope.
/r/MensRights29/12/10 12:55 AM
3

Huh, now that I think about it, Animal Farm has a lot of parallels to gender equality.
/r/MensRights02/12/10 01:04 PM
6

That logic makes my head hurt. How could they tell you that with a straight face? I'm sorry that had to happen to you.
/r/MensRights01/12/10 11:22 PM
1

What's your point?
/r/MensRights24/11/10 11:56 PM
1

This is even with joint custody! O_O Wow. Good luck, and I hope that you're eventually able to sort things out properly.
/r/MensRights23/11/10 04:37 PM
5

two thirds of his before tax income What the fuck. That's just ridiculous.
/r/MensRights23/11/10 01:56 AM
3

This is beyond ridiculous. It's a shame that the r/feminisms mods aren't interested in acting fairly.
/r/MensRights31/10/10 06:04 PM
2

So what ended up happening with regards to the PM?
/r/MensRights30/10/10 11:03 PM
5

And he's really offending invertebrates.
/r/MensRights30/10/10 03:13 AM
3

Heels can also be taken off if you really need to run somewhere.
/r/MensRights09/10/10 09:18 PM
6

It's almost as if heels can be easily taken off, leaving the wearer much more mobile than before. Nah, can't be true.
/r/MensRights09/10/10 09:17 PM
1

Don't the most poisonous gases descend closer to the ground, anyways?
/r/MensRights09/10/10 09:07 PM
1

the teacher wrote "Next time pick something less macho". There is no question as to why the girls did better in that course. Ugh. This kind of thing is infuriating. I'm glad your college classmates were able to discover how enjoyable reading can be when you read about something are interested in.
/r/MensRights11/07/10 05:03 PM
3

Off-topic, but Lord durpadurp Did you get a promotion?
/r/MensRights10/07/10 04:53 PM
7

I remember reading something about how relatively few males read books, and how most books are aimed at women. This may explain why everything in the library was more female-orientated; Did you notice if there were more females in the library than males? I think the problem is that there is a negative-feedback loop. With more and more girl-oriented material, boys will be less likely to read/participate, and with less boys participating at the library, material will be increasingly even more girl…
/r/MensRights10/07/10 04:50 PM
8

I thought to myself, if I'm making more than them, why should I follow their advice? Just because they are making less doesn't mean their advice is worth less.
/r/MensRights06/07/10 02:45 AM
1

They don't have two recesses anymore?! Heck, we had three recesses if you include lunch.
/r/MensRights06/07/10 02:38 AM
3

How does it not belong in Men's Rights?
/r/MensRights30/06/10 03:29 AM
1

Whoa. I walk past Anderson almost everyday. In fact, I will be doing that in ~9 hours for my last final. Small world.
/r/MensRights09/06/10 05:59 AM
14

The correct word is supremacist, but yeah. I agree with you.
/r/MensRights06/06/10 05:14 PM
8

I agreed with this post so much that I actually tried to upvote it twice (once for your first sentence, and then once for the bit after the quote). Of course, then I realized what I had done, so I had to upvote you a third time.
/r/MensRights06/06/10 05:12 PM
4

DougDante, if you do not return with the answers in hand by sundown, CONSIDER YOURSELF EXCOMMUNICATED You have been warned. ~By general reddit consensus protocol - See section 2.4 of The Reddit Regulations, available to Gold Members only for a limited amount of time~
/r/MensRights13/05/10 03:50 PM
5

Oh really? By that logic, rape victims are also able to "sometimes gain from the experience." I feel like punching something right now.
/r/MensRights03/05/10 02:16 PM
4

Say yes and draw a circle around him.
/r/MensRights26/04/10 06:26 AM
1

Is restoration possible for you?
/r/MensRights26/04/10 06:26 AM
6

Plus, I think it's extremely disrespectful to those who have suffered in the past. What does anyone today know about what they went through? On top of this, it's ridiculous to assume that everything must divide on gender lines. I don't know about that poster, but my ancestors are both women and men.
/r/MensRights25/04/10 04:10 AM
15

Yes, "douchebag men" want you to forget what you never experienced in the first place. Just to be clear, what is it that you want? Do you want women to completely dominate society? Is equality now thrown out of the window?
/r/MensRights25/04/10 04:06 AM
3

The fact that this is the top comment disturbs me. To be fair, there were two comments at the time you/I posted a reply to this comment.
/r/MensRights24/04/10 04:33 PM
9

I don't know if I noticed anything overwhelming a few months ago, but I admit that I sporadically check this subreddit and may not have the best perspective. If that's indeed true, then I agree with you; we need to make sure it doesn't happen again.
/r/MensRights24/04/10 04:31 PM
7

All people deserve equal opportunities, protections and justice under the law as individuals, not as members of a group. I completely agree with this. However, I feel like I should point out something: it's equally as necessary to make sure that an individual is not discriminated against because they happen to be members of some group. I think that's the basic premise of pretty much every civil rights movement. Also, I think it's a bit hasty to brand all of feminism with such loaded terminology.…
/r/MensRights24/04/10 03:39 PM
10

How is this a Men's Rights issue at all? It's tangentially related through the patriarchy bit; feminists often refer to the white patriarchy as a source for every happenstance, which often annoys MRAs who often believe there can be other reasons for a happening beyond the white patriarchy. At any rate, you're right; this article isn't really related to Men's Rights. And the commenters there are idiots of the worst sort. So the question to MensRights- it this reddit just an offshoot of the Tea Pa…
/r/MensRights24/04/10 03:23 PM
10

I was held on a rooftop in Haiti and raped repeatedly by one of the very men who I had spent the bulk of my life advocating for. This sounds just a tad like rape. she doesn't blame the patriarchy. She just accepted it I'm having a hard time trying to understand how the white patriarchy resulted in her rape.
/r/MensRights24/04/10 03:16 PM
23

It's his college gym.
/r/MensRights15/04/10 08:35 PM
17

Idahoan Senate, but yeah. This is good.
/r/MensRights16/03/10 04:07 PM
-1

Buy a new sarcasm detector. Please.
/r/MensRights15/03/10 10:43 AM
6

I wonder if it would look like if hours at work were also taken into account as a contribution. It might be interesting.
/r/MensRights14/03/10 05:13 PM
1

IOKIYAMRA appears to be adapted from IOKIYAR ("It's OK if you're a Republican") and probably means "It's okay if you're a Men's Rights Activist".
/r/MensRights08/03/10 05:11 PM
1

What are you insinuating about my sexual orientation? Why did you automatically assume I'm gay!?! (and so what if I am?!)
/r/MensRights06/03/10 02:12 AM
2

Yes, yes. This appears to be deeper than I thought it was. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/b9n91/in_other_uk_news_female_bank_manager_steals_1m/c0ln769
/r/MensRights05/03/10 03:04 PM
6

I would be extremely skeptical if it were only the "battered woman" claim lending credence to the accusation of coercion. But there's also her financial status to consider. Why was-- NEVER MIND I READ ANOTHER ARTICLE (from before the trial): Mr Paltenghi said there was evidence Miss Wadsworth had benefited from the scam herself although she kept her account overdrawn to prevent unwanted attention.
/r/MensRights05/03/10 03:03 PM
3

But the "son" is also reflective of discrimination against womyn! It's a massive conspiracy.
/r/MensRights05/03/10 02:58 PM
–

There is NO question that the boyfriend is involved. The whole flaunting of wealth aspect is an immediate red flag. Whether she was coerced is up for debate. And I suppose you're right in that stealing is stealing. It's still wrong for me to rob a bank even if I give all of the money to charity. In any case, I think I'm now of the opinion that while any possible coercion should have influenced her sentencing, I don't think she should have been cleared of wrongdoing.
/r/MensRights05/03/10 02:54 PM
–

Okay, I somewhat take that back. My initial impression was that you believed the boyfriend was at no fault, but now I'm not quite sure if that was your intent in the title. Anyways, what do you make of her financial status, then? They judged that she didn't gain financially from this, and that seems to be a large factor in the final decision (it wasn't just the battered woman/helplessness/whatever).
/r/MensRights05/03/10 02:51 PM
–

She certainly should have called the police. I'm not sure what exactly to think; if there are missing facts, we don't know them. It's not right to immediately assume that she's lying just because we're interested in Men's Rights. As it is, I can only take this at face value with some suspicion.
/r/MensRights05/03/10 02:45 PM
–

I agree that that's strange, but at the same time, I don't want to use speculation as a basis for anything.
/r/MensRights05/03/10 02:43 PM
–

I don't know...the facts seem pretty clear in this case. She really was coerced by her boyfriend. edit: Ok, I was probably wrong. I didn't want to make claims without more facts, but then I found those facts. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/b9n91/in_other_uk_news_female_bank_manager_steals_1m/c0ln769
/r/MensRights05/03/10 02:29 PM
2

Victims don't deserve to be assaulted/raped/whatever. HOWEVER, that doesn't mean you can go and do whatever the hell you want. You should still take precautions for your own safety. There is no victim-blaming going on here.
/r/MensRights05/03/10 03:40 AM
1

Seriously? I'd like to know more about this.
/r/MensRights02/03/10 11:23 PM
4

So what is your opinion on female circumcision, then?
/r/MensRights02/03/10 10:59 PM
1

Have you had any accidents beyond minor scratches/bruises?
/r/MensRights02/03/10 01:50 AM
3

Perhaps she meant progressive in the sense of equality, and that even the people who should be most in favor of equal rights have ingrained stereotypes.
/r/MensRights02/03/10 12:36 AM
2

Off-topic, but...how hard is it to learn unicycling? (Perhaps you can/should do an IAmA!)
/r/MensRights02/03/10 12:22 AM
1

I carefully squat down until I feel the toilet seat (I am a guy). This is what I do, as well. It has to "feel right", if that makes any sense.
/r/MensRights26/02/10 08:40 AM
1

Yeah...I wouldn't have thought it possible before, but I recently saw something on reddit (don't remember if it was a comment or posted article) about how some guy called 911, and then his partner shouted something in the background about how she was being assaulted before he could say anything. That is just screwed up.
/r/MensRights24/02/10 06:48 AM
1

Huh; I'm the opposite. I want to keep my name precisely because it's googleable. Maybe that reveals how naive and uncaring of my privacy I am...I just think that being easily googleable is an advantage in today's world. I can see how it's a double-edged sword, though.
/r/MensRights18/02/10 04:33 AM
–

The relevance to this subreddit isn't the article. I, personally, have nothing against the article and think it's great. The point (a tangent from the article, I admit) is that it's disheartening for a man to believe his gender is inferior. There are many great things about men, just as the same is true about women. Men are equal, not inferior. Anyways, I don't see any accusations regarding feminist conspiracy theory here; don't randomly jump to conclusions.
/r/MensRights17/02/10 08:14 PM
2

The page that was linked to was the second page of the article. Here's the first page if you missed it.
/r/MensRights13/02/10 06:05 PM
3

Some sources would probably ward off downmodders.
/r/MensRights13/02/10 03:42 AM
1

I'm really trying to understand who isn't excluded by his policy. Reading that post just made me dumber.
/r/MensRights11/02/10 10:50 AM
–

Let's not turn this into /r/women et al. One of the most positive aspects about /r/MensRights is that it doesn't ban people left and right.
/r/MensRights11/02/10 10:43 AM
6

I really don't think it's as bad as it's made out to be. /r/MensRights is certainly better than it used to be. Besides, instead of abandoning this subreddit, it's better that we work to try and make it an excellent place.
/r/MensRights11/02/10 10:40 AM
2

Damn. It's ridiculous how blinded by her own bullshit she is.
/r/MensRights11/02/10 10:37 AM
–

Honestly, I'm really annoyed with all the posts that go "OMG /r/MensRights is chock-full of misogyny...". For the most part, I really don't see that; this may have been true months ago, but now, /r/MensRights largely self-polices itself appropriately. It annoys me how it's just an accepted fact to these people that all the female-oriented subreddits are the paragon of excellence, and that /r/MensRights is practically hellspawn.
/r/MensRights09/02/10 05:40 AM
1

It's entirely possible that both studies describe different contributing factors. This is a complex issue, after all.
/r/MensRights09/02/10 04:03 AM
5

I suppose this is why it's never a good idea to get involved in a relationship with a lawyer. I wish you the best of luck.
/r/MensRights09/02/10 04:00 AM
-2

Don't worry, gingerroot could ban you herself (from /r/women). Congratulations, you're doubly-fucked! :P
/r/MensRights09/02/10 03:27 AM
2

Because it was amusing.
/r/MensRights09/02/10 03:23 AM
1

Yeah, it's pretty disgusting. Like a gigantic flesh mass. Ugh.
/r/MensRights08/02/10 11:23 PM
7

It's okay; I'm a male and I upvote most of your posts because you seem to think critically and don't just leap to conclusions.
/r/MensRights08/02/10 09:28 AM
1

The "women rock" part at any rate...the "why" is a little bit suspect.
/r/MensRights26/01/10 06:32 AM
1

The money was donated before it was revealed that the allegations of assault were false. There's nothing with saving the money for a future incident. I do agree that there should be strong consequences for these women; false accusations of any sort need to have repercussions.
/r/MensRights05/09/09 11:46 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter