sunear Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
4	Woman worries about having a son, because of "possibilities of him harming women and girls". Another suggests terminating him because of his sex. Psychological help, perhaps. Personnally I'd have reported her to child welfare authorities. If she has that attitude towards a still-unborn child, I'm extremely worried how she'll treat that poor boy when he's born. He'll be set up for child abuse that'll make the Dursley's blush, just because of his sex. It's doubly ironic since these women will undoubtedly harp on cultures that discriminate against girls in favour of boys — and rightly so, I might add — but then conveniently forget that they'…	/r/EverydayMisandry	20/05/26 11:38 PM
3	Why does it seem that women's feelings override any normal relationship boundaries? And I appreciate your openness and empathy. My father was a shitstain too. Considering the context I had established with the use of that word... Ouch. You have my heartfelt sympathies. My own father hasn't quite been a "shitstain" to this level, but surely still caused me a lot of issues that I've had to deal with, including as an adult. Maybe your use of past tense was quite literal, and you've had opportunity to dance on the shitstain's grave. If not, do consider it - such symbolic acts can b…	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/12/25 06:47 PM
6	Why does it seem that women's feelings override any normal relationship boundaries? Sorry to be so blunt, but you need to chill a bit, my man - you're totally misunderstanding what they're saying, and I think it might be because you're missing some context. You see, it's very well-established (and at least somewhat widely known) that people who have experienced certain forms of psychological abuse/trauma, especially (but not exclusively) in their childhood and formative years, can develop a sort of "pathological preference" for abusers when they look for partners in later life.…	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/12/25 02:57 PM
1	“I won’t donate my organs because I don’t want them saving a man.” Aye.	/r/EverydayMisandry	02/09/25 08:01 PM
3	“I won’t donate my organs because I don’t want them saving a man.” European here (I know you aren't). Fuck off; you have no fucking clue what you're talking about. The Ukrainian women (many, if not most, with accompanying children - their Ukrainian husbands' children) that became war refugees fled out in the very early days when the disgusting orcs were coming in from everywhere, invading their homeland - capturing where they lived (or seemed to be just about to). But you think they should've just stayed and get fucking raped and killed for sport, like in the B…	/r/EverydayMisandry	02/09/25 03:14 PM
1	“I won’t donate my organs because I don’t want them saving a man.” It's fucking disgusting how much you got downvoted for this. This sub is supposed to be anti-misandry, not pro-misogyny, but it feels like it's been invaded by a fuckton of manosphere shitheads.	/r/EverydayMisandry	02/09/25 03:01 PM
1	“I won’t donate my organs because I don’t want them saving a man.” Because they need cannon fodder for a proxy war with Russia. Seeing so ample proof that the US alt-righters are heavily present on this sub (as in, how many didn't find that final remark off-putting enough to not give you an upvote) makes me want to leave. Btw, fuck off on opinionating on Ukraine when you're apparently one of those who wholeheartedly approve of the US abandoning it. You are entitled to that opinion, but then at least have the grace to stay out of it entirely - seeing as you want…	/r/EverydayMisandry	02/09/25 02:56 PM
3	UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer Blames 'Young Men in Their Bedrooms' for Southport Knife Attack, Calls for Action on This New and Evolving Terror Threat Not exactly true - and in fact, you're stereotyping here, concluding they're all gamers (I know you didn't say "all", but close enough). That's largely irrelevant for the discussion though. So anyway, people (men and women) who are "functionally hermits" of a sort are, however, likely to have a bunch of time on their hands. Time they can use on the internet. An internet where, if you're not careful, you can find yourself in some dark, toxic places that will whisper nasty shit, but which sounds g…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	28/01/25 05:54 PM
3	I’ve created a subreddit for LGBT men’s rights activism I don't doubt that my question is wouldn't Lesbian issues fall under Women's rights/Feminism not a Men's Movement? Perhaps, but what's the harm in having multiple spaces for them? Another place where they can find allies and community, maybe even have a larger voice? They're more than just their gender/sex. Not to mention, a trans woman who's attracted to women is a lesbian, but also has a background with a male perspective - I for one still think they have relevance in discussing male issues; i…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	24/01/25 03:15 PM
2	I feel like most guys just want acknowledgment that things can suck for men too. I think envy is wired into the female psyche real intensely A bit late here, but I agree with this very much. I have this pet theory that the group of people who most define the social stigma against (female) sex workers, and prostitutes in particular, are women. Sure, there is absolutely a huuuge amount of hate from misogynistic men also. But most men don't really have a problem with it, including those (the majority, as far as we know) who'd never, ah, entertain their services. But women? I se…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	19/01/25 01:13 AM
0	Genuinely curious about it What do you mean with seeing things the same way? That was me being more nice than you frankly deserved in referencing your misogynistic beliefs. You have an anti-women view, and I can't ever fucking support that, and I don't fucking want to associate with people who hold such viewpoints. It doesn't matter, then, what we might be able to have some sort of minor agreement on, because you'll be coming to that from a point of hate. It's like I don't want to talk to racist nationalists about patriot…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	28/12/24 06:11 PM
0	Genuinely curious about it Sure you don't have an argument so you don't want to engage and resort to ad hominems. No, I just don't want to engage with you. I like my sanity intact, and I don't want to get dragged down to your level. Also, is it an ad hominem if it's true? I mean, you then said; if you care about equality that is, but of course you don't. Where the fuck did I say I didn't care about men's reproductive rights? (Or equality, for that matter?) That's why it's fitting to call you a "fool", because you can't re…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	27/12/24 10:21 PM
5	Genuinely curious about it No, I'm not going to get into a stupid argument with some "pro-life" fool who's gotten onto the wrong sub. Abortion should be a right in any civilised country. The fact that men doesn't have an equivalent right, while related, is a separate issue, and I don't appreciate how you try to devalue women's right to abortion by conflating things. Bye.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	27/12/24 08:39 PM
0	Genuinely curious about it I can't. I'm not going to grandstand on this; in this instance it's simply my feeling of how the balance of the scale tips. But I don't feel like I can present a precise, factual argument for why that is the case, so I won't try. I don't want to give the impression that I don't think men's issues are significant, I think they very much are, and what I argue for is that they need attention, too, and ASAP - but that I also recognise that women still face issues, and I still want to work to resolve…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	27/12/24 08:22 PM
0	Genuinely curious about it Eh, that took a drastic turn...? What's your point? I honestly don't know; I should hope not, but maybe. Thing is, child support money is guaranteed by the state here, so even if someone can't pay, it'll still be paid out. By that mechanism, if it was recognised that the child resulted from rape, I suppose the courts could declare the victim/father shouldn't be required to pay, and the state could take over - if it was deemed that was necessary. But I'm honestly not aware of such a case having h…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	26/12/24 09:58 PM
1	Genuinely curious about it it benefits women and oppresses men. I was agreeing with you until this point, but here we disagree. It would, imo, be more correct to say that it oppressed both women and men (and there's a discussion to be had about whom are/were the more oppressed; I'd argue it's women, but that oppression of men is still very significant) but also benefited both women and men (likewise, here I'd argue that it benefited men more, but that the benefits to women were/are significant enough that we definitely ne…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	26/12/24 03:00 PM
3	I hate the accusation that this kind of behaviour is a product of male norms. Lol! Thank you. Side note: I would hope so, but it's really up to the people of Greenland. I don't think Denmark would try to prevent them from seceding, even if we legally could, which I'm not so sure about (Greenland is technically in a union with Denmark under the realm of our monarch or something, rather than under Denmark itself - which is a technicality, but suffice to say it's more like the UK's Commonwealth than Greenland being truly subordinate). Either way, the 'suggestion' that the US…	/r/EverydayMisandry	24/12/24 09:53 PM
2	I hate the accusation that this kind of behaviour is a product of male norms. Thanks for the clarification, it's obvious now that I got it wrong. Happy Christmas :)	/r/EverydayMisandry	24/12/24 09:32 PM
2	I hate the accusation that this kind of behaviour is a product of male norms. No, I didn't set out to purposefully misread you. I misunderstood, and that's my bad. Honestly I just wasn't sure; I've seen an influx of people that (I believe) would make such arguments here on this sub, and so I didn't really know what was up. I suppose that's what I get for making Reddit comments while in the middle the stress of Christmas Eve (us Danes celebrate Christmas tonight, rather than on Christmas Day, if you're confused). Anyway, my apologies. Happy Christmas :)	/r/EverydayMisandry	24/12/24 09:32 PM
-5	I hate the accusation that this kind of behaviour is a product of male norms. Because of on-demand abortion and the use oral contraceptives, women devalue human life to the point where murder for the sake of convenience makes sense. Wtf is this? I honestly can't tell if you meant this to be sarcastic, as in, no, women don't actually do this. Rather, it sounds like you're making some sort of sick "pro-life" whataboutism. Maybe you are being sarcastic or whatever, and I'm just being sensitive, but even if so, I feel like this isn't a matter to make such provocative statemen…	/r/EverydayMisandry	24/12/24 12:15 PM
1	"Women have been opressed so it's your turn" They conflate vindication with resentment and revenge, and you have an illiterate society that validates such ideologies You should have stopped with this. It's a great point and a good insight into society and how we seem to be on a downwards slope into hate and idiocy... ... but the rest of your comment just seems like wild and radical conspiracy theories. You can make those claims, sure, but just throwing a bomb out there without actually backing it up with proper arguments for it, well, it's…	/r/EverydayMisandry	20/12/24 11:37 AM
1	"Women have been opressed so it's your turn" Yeah, that doesn't make sense. I know for a fact that there's a lot of men who don't wipe their dick after peeing (which to me only makes any sort of sense if you're at a urinal, it's also easier to shake it and not make a mess on your pants & elsewhere when using those), but... not wipe their butts? Jfc, that's just a whole other level of disgusting.	/r/EverydayMisandry	20/12/24 11:22 AM
2	Exterminate Men It seems that it only works in the app. I believe it's because it's been age-restricted (18+) and you need to be logged in.	/r/EverydayMisandry	18/12/24 03:56 PM
9	Bro cis men do not act like this Some sort of cognitive dissonance, if I had to make a guess. It's one of the few occasions, I imagine, where it potentially "works in their favour" that they were born female. Unlike cis men, whom are undoubtedly 100% the target when misandrists say shit about 'men', trans men could (I'm speculating) mentally either "auto-translate" that to being only about cis men, or, probably worse for their sense of identity, disassociate from the statement by, briefly, think they're "not (fully) men" (or so…	/r/EverydayMisandry	18/12/24 02:38 PM
2	Is society entitled to men putting themselves in danger to rescue others? Do we owe "heroism" to random strangers?? left wing title This is r/everydaymisandry, not r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates :) I daresay, LWMA is actually very good and decent (even if the posts tend to be a bit long-winded). It's also not a "complaint-sub" the same way this is, which probably helps, plus all the hard right-wingers are allergic to it.	/r/EverydayMisandry	17/12/24 08:06 PM
2	Is society entitled to men putting themselves in danger to rescue others? Do we owe "heroism" to random strangers?? Precisely, it's a really complicated issue. With a loved one, shouldn't you at least try and get them out, even if you think they're being stupid? I'd say so, if you reasonably can. And by all means, try to be the voice of reason, deescalation, non-confrontation and negotiation in the process. Or just knock out Drunk Guy with a straight haymaker to the face, idc, not my prison sentence. (Please don't just punch someone, it's a joke.) In fact, I'd go further and say a lot of the replies here have…	/r/EverydayMisandry	17/12/24 07:25 PM
2	Is society entitled to men putting themselves in danger to rescue others? Do we owe "heroism" to random strangers?? Yeah, I also do largely agree with that. Actually, my other, top-level comment explained my position better. I basically think he's got some degree of responsibility for looking out for her (but indeed, only to a degree), yet conspicuously didn't even pay attention. So I can actually understand she's pissed about that, how she got in the situation notwithstanding. But she also failed to communicate with him, to show more restraint, and indeed expected him to save her arse, unfairly and unreasona…	/r/EverydayMisandry	17/12/24 04:56 PM
1	Is society entitled to men putting themselves in danger to rescue others? Do we owe "heroism" to random strangers?? Exactly. I daresay we don't just sort of agree, but fully agree.	/r/EverydayMisandry	17/12/24 02:59 PM
0	Is society entitled to men putting themselves in danger to rescue others? Do we owe "heroism" to random strangers?? Sometimes we don't really get to have a choice, if we have people we care about in harm's way. If he indeed thought Drunk Guy was a threat, at least he should see to get his GF out of harms way, not necessarily by means of taking Drunk Guy on the directly.	/r/EverydayMisandry	17/12/24 07:57 AM
2	Is society entitled to men putting themselves in danger to rescue others? Do we owe "heroism" to random strangers?? I don't really know how I feel about this one. I do think the BF absolutely failed in his "responsibilities" as a man and human being. The thing that weirds me out in particular is him being on his phone while his GF is in some physical confrontation (of sorts) with some random drunk guy. Doesn't he care to at least look? It's his GF, for crying out loud (supposed to love and all that jazz, right?). And it doesn't jive with his later excuse - because if he was actually perceiving Drunk Guy as a …	/r/EverydayMisandry	17/12/24 07:49 AM
5	How open is this sub to working with feminists? I think you encounter a selection bias. See, I think few politically moderate or leftist(-ish) men (I am talking from a Northern European perspective here, tbc) are particularly willing to, or comfortable in expressing, critique of feminism or advocate for men's rights, simply because it is often "punished" by intense pushback (based off quick, negative assumptions from the listener) and downright ridicule and harassment. As I'm sure you can understand, it then becomes something you only do very…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	12/12/24 03:28 PM
4	How do you guys tell people you're an MRA/male advocate? Agreed; I also often use the word "sexism" when calling it out - much easier. 'Sexism' is already an established term by feminists themselves, so it works well, and avoids the taboo that seems to have arisen around the term 'misandry'. The word "misandry" often isn't even well understood/recognised; I remember mentioned it to my mother (who proclaims to be such a connoisseur of language) and she was like, "what?", and I had to have this really awkward/painful moment of describing "you know... th…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	05/12/24 09:08 AM
1	When a News Outlet Calls a Relationship Between a Teenager and Someone Pushing 30 What It Is The other top-level comments (at this time) doesn't make that distinction though ("barely an adult"), but rather just talks of relationships with "significant" age gaps or a "much younger" partner. I actually agree with you, that 19 is probably too young (there might be rare exceptions, but they'd be, well, rare). But I can't say we have much right to comment if the younger partner is, say, in their early twenties. Lots of maturation happening in those years, and exposure to the darker sides of …	/r/EverydayMisandry	01/11/24 07:43 AM
5	Women are more nice to gay men, and not straight men. Because they think straight men are more likely to mistake their kindness as romantic interest. Just chiming in here with my support and upvote. All of what you said is correct.	/r/EverydayMisandry	31/10/24 06:11 PM
1	An admission that feminism is not for everyone They use that term (derogatively) to mean that that's how men/society supposedly view(ed) women; as mere sex/domestic slaves. And they very much oppose that notion, of course (as do everyone here, I imagine). However, given how hateful they usually are when they use that term, I'd say it could be argued that it's actually (often) misandric.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	31/10/24 03:07 PM
1	Is objectification bad? I would tend to agree, I think. There is such a thing as bad objectification, but indeed, the way the "popular narrative" has developed (and become misused), there seems to be a trend towards villainisation of male sexuality. But as you say, in sexual attraction, there's always going to be some level of "objectification", in a sense. In truth, there's a balance to it, one that some men (and women) overstep in terms of sexually objectifying others excessively.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	04/10/24 08:53 AM
2	Is objectification bad? We are not talking about the BDSM version of objectification. You misunderstand me; I was talking very generally and in response to your talk about generalised "objectifying" in terms of resources, etc. I didn't mean to imply anything about BDSM (or even sex) in particular. (Was it me talking about 'consent' that made you think otherwise?) I think the real issue is that like a lot of things this phrase has been taken out of context and we need a different word to specify this Behavior here. Beca…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	03/10/24 02:33 PM
3	Is objectification bad? If that politeness is actually genuine (or reasonably so), you're not treating them as a mere means to an end; you are using them, yes, but you recognise their humanity. They have consented to work that function (and are getting compensated for that), but they aren't less of a human being for working to "service" others. But if customers do treat them like garbage, like slaves to serve their "superiors", that they haven't consented to - and they shouldn't have to. (This distinction is a core ten…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	03/10/24 01:35 PM
2	Is objectification bad? Kantian philosophy actually has some interesting thoughts on this. It advocates that you cannot treat people as a "mere means" (to an end), instead of treating them as, you know, people (with their own agency and desires, etc.), ie. not just "using" them. The idea is that we indeed use other people all the time, but that they need to consent to that in some way (like getting paid or otherwise wanting to). To me, "objectification" thus (usually) means that it's a form of negative, exaggerated obj…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	03/10/24 01:21 PM
5	The reason men are so obsessed with virginity and sexual performance is because most women are No, it's more the equivalent of fat-shaming a woman, or attacking her looks fundamentally. It's a deeper level of attack that seeks to hurt people in their deepest insecurities. I'm not saying calling people a 'pussy' isn't bad or sexist in itself, but it's not quite the same.	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/09/24 05:40 PM
5	This is why we should take false rape accusations seriously Thanks for the "Dog Park" link, disturbingly interesting that is. I'm reminded of the researchers who submitted sections of Mein Kampf (edited such that eg. mentions of Jews, etc. were replaced with "men", that sort of thing) to numerous gender studies and feminist journals, and successfully had them accepted. Eerily similar and disturbing. I wouldn't be surprised if that was the inspiration for the Men Kampf sub.	/r/EverydayMisandry	17/09/24 08:41 AM
2	For the first time, reddit took action against Misandry (report action in 2nd picture). Immediately after, the hate sub that features an uncountable of posts like this one went private. A small victory, but a victory nonetheless. Right, I completely agree. I should have been more clear on where exactly my "disagreement" was: that is, solely on whether said invalidation in and of itself is an example of (mild) transphobia. Which is a quite minor detail altogether as to your overall comment, and admittedly, it might well have been too much of a digression from the topic at hand to be particularly relevant for me to comment on. There is indeed a lot less actual hatred in the latter (good comparison, btw!), and probably litt…	/r/EverydayMisandry	10/09/24 02:16 PM
1	For the first time, reddit took action against Misandry (report action in 2nd picture). Immediately after, the hate sub that features an uncountable of posts like this one went private. A small victory, but a victory nonetheless. I respectfully disagree on the last part. I know what you mean/are getting at; I just want to point out that such a fundamental invalidation of trans people is, in and of itself, transphobic - even if it may be of the milder variety. Also, people that hold such beliefs often (but far from always) also hold harsher anti-trans beliefs.	/r/EverydayMisandry	09/09/24 09:29 AM
1	For the first time, reddit took action against Misandry (report action in 2nd picture). Immediately after, the hate sub that features an uncountable of posts like this one went private. A small victory, but a victory nonetheless. It's not just transphobic, it's also anti-intersex people. They often have different sex chromosomes than XX or XY. As the Cleveland Clinic describes it: People who are intersex have genitals, chromosomes or reproductive organs that don't fit into a male/female sex binary. Their genitals might not match their reproductive organs, or they may have traits of both. Being intersex may be evident at birth, childhood, later in adulthood or never.	/r/EverydayMisandry	09/09/24 09:21 AM
2	Wanting female approval is usually harmful for men. I understand what your points but you’re assuming that if one validates internally they subsequently won’t gain external validation from others. Actually, no - I thought you might be implying that one should ignore (to some extent) such external validation from others that would follow. And to be clear, I moreso assumed that was because you hadn't thought it through, or something (I mean, it happens). But it's pretty clear from your reply that my "fears" were unfounded 🙂 Side note though: While …	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	07/09/24 06:57 PM
7	Wanting female approval is usually harmful for men. The women-are-wonderful effect in action again, I suppose.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	07/09/24 05:54 PM
7	Wanting female approval is usually harmful for men. Interesting point. Also, going further, I'd argue that even the notion of your superior not (ever) needing your approval is actually toxic leadership (even if it's, sadly, extremely common). What I mean is that a good leader is one that is respected by their subordinates (among other things). That doesn't mean the subordinates will always agree with everything, but they should at least respect them. That respect is a form of approval. Going back to your point, the implication is (even moreso) on…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	07/09/24 05:50 PM
1	Wanting female approval is usually harmful for men. I both agree and disagree. First and foremost, yes, people should seek approval from themselves. As you also expand on in your other reply, it's healthy, and helps you achieve a sort of internal equilibrium. On the other hand, getting approval from others is also important to us. And in and of itself, there is nothing wrong with that. The problem arises if you depend on it too much, such that you cannot feel validated except for if you get that validation from others. The trick here, I feel, is …	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	07/09/24 05:43 PM
6	The phase "feminism is for men too" can't coexist with the oppressed vs oppressor dichotomy. Because it's a major contradiction. Feminism didn't "create gender" (as a problem or otherwise); at worst they took it and ran with it (which is why they in many cases now have a problem with fitting their theory to trans/non-binary/gender-nonconforming people). That might not be a major distinction, but it's an important one.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	05/09/24 09:48 AM
11	The phase "feminism is for men too" can't coexist with the oppressed vs oppressor dichotomy. Because it's a major contradiction. Yeah, they don't just fall short of taking action for helping solve men's issues, they tend to actively work against it. Here in Denmark, there have long been a men's rights (technically, fathers' rights) organisation called "Foreningen Far" (the "Association Father", or "Fathers' Association"; they also offer counseling and actually even have an advisory position in the UN). They have long championed the rights of men in family matters, most prominently legally (especially in family court). And…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	05/09/24 08:57 AM
16	How do they manage to be this racist and rationalize it as them being misandrist, thus okay? Lmao The funny thing is, you don't even need actual crime statistics to reasonably/logically disprove this. The only context in which "white men" can possibly be 13% of the population is worldwide. So, for the comparison to 50% of murders to even work, this must then also be 50% of worldwide murders. I'm sorry, but that either means the group of predominantly-white countries (ie., where the vast majority of white men live) has an absolutely batshit murder rate compared to the rest of the world (which…	/r/EverydayMisandry	03/09/24 03:25 PM
2	Thoughts? Sorry for late reply: yes, I think you're right. I might have misunderstood; there was a whole lot of debate about it some time ago. It does make a whole lot more sense that the consent can be communicated by other means, so long as it is clear.	/r/EverydayMisandry	02/09/24 12:35 PM
0	Misandry runs in Indian Judiciary! You didn't answer the question: Define "very young child." The majority of my comment was me not being in agreement with you, but you focus on the part where I seemingly am in agreement with you?	/r/EverydayMisandry	31/08/24 04:31 PM
1	Misandry runs in Indian Judiciary! Define "very young child." A mother can breastfeed a baby (but even that's not guaranteed), and that's the only extent to which a man cannot potentially be entirely as good - and that's only because breast milk replacement formula isn't quite as good for the baby as actual mother's milk. But even then, the baby will probably be fine - all else being equal. (I'm assuming that bottle feeding - where the baby is held in the same position - will create equal bonding between baby and feeder as if it …	/r/EverydayMisandry	31/08/24 01:54 PM
5	Child Abuse Apologists -- "She's just overwhelmed!" Wow, that's just insane.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	31/08/24 12:03 AM
2	Thoughts? You know, I find myself wholeheartedly agreeing with everything you're saying. Great points. It's funny you should bring up true crime shows, because I've recently had similar thoughts about them. For the same reasons as you said, I also don't mind them, but I personally find them a bit too much, for these exact reasons - it's almost like horror-emotional "porn" sometimes. To add to that, I believe (although I'm not sure) that women are also the primary audience of fictional crime shows like Cri…	/r/EverydayMisandry	30/08/24 11:18 PM
2	Thoughts? That's a totally valid point. I would say though that violent computer games usually don't draw it out; it's quick and done usually. Whereas the sexual acts depicted here are drawn out; if it indeed is SA, is the game then not letting/having the player do torturous things? But you still have a point. Even if there is a line to be drawn between quick killing and torture, and between seeing NPCs doing it vs the player do it, what I think you're getting at - that these games already portray plenty …	/r/EverydayMisandry	30/08/24 05:13 PM
1	Thoughts? fear-mongering about "problematic" entertainment. I'm not gonna pretend it hasn't in many instances gone (way) too far; in particular when it's become moreso about screaming offense from the rooftops rather than having a civil discussion about things that are perceived as problematic. However, there is a lot of ways that media portrayals and entertainment have been very sexist, racist, etc.; or even just subtly so, which is potentially even more damaging since it's more difficult to spot and com…	/r/EverydayMisandry	29/08/24 04:03 PM
-1	Thoughts? the perpetually offended, pearl clutching libs online are literally no different than the perpetually offended, pearl clutching conservatives of the past who rallied against videogames, hip-hip, violent movies, etc. (Emphasis mine.) Eh, the modern conservatives are as perpetually offended and pearl-clutching as ever, actually moreso than ever IMHO. They're no better than the "libs", and I daresay, often worse. I mean, Project 2025 might as well be a declaration of war on pronouns... (among sooo …	/r/EverydayMisandry	29/08/24 02:48 PM
2	Thoughts? Right, thanks for adding your interpretation. Indeed, as I said, my take is based on the OOP's interpretation. As you mention, the way the anal sex is portrayed can be interpreted in a multitude of ways - but I would add that the protagonist should have ensured the girl was as comfortable as possible; ie., asked/communicated clearly. Anal sex requires a bunch of due diligence and attention to one's partner, simply because it can very easily be very hurtful. Admittedly, porn in general most often…	/r/EverydayMisandry	29/08/24 01:13 PM
4	Thoughts? I'm gonna overall disagree with you on this one, OP. Yes, I think that there's clearly signs that the OOP holds, shall we say, some views I do not agree with, but if we take their description of that game at face value (which could admittedly well be biased, but I have not seen/played that game, so idk) - and in particular, the sex scenes - they do have a point. There's lots of that which seems to me to be, if not outright SA, at the very least some very morally/ethically questionable behaviour …	/r/EverydayMisandry	29/08/24 11:55 AM
1	In the 2024 Democratic Party Platform, the word Women appears 82 times, the word Men, 4 times. In the US, how can we encourage Democrats to focus more and boys and men? https://menandthe2024election.substack.com/p/the-dnc-story-no-ones-talking-about Great points.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	28/08/24 11:05 AM
1	In a complicated discussion about medical examinations, a man shares his history and is immediately sexualized. While I wouldn't be surprised to know that that unhinged poster was a TERF, I'll remind you that it stands for trans-exclusionary radical feminist. We don't know if she hates trans people, necessarily (even if it might seem likely). It'd be more appropriate to just call her a "radfem".	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	27/08/24 01:16 PM
1	Got banned from a subreddit because of this I wasn't talking about past, specific discrimination. I was talking about what future policies we can clearly expect from a new administration of his, if he becomes president again. Those policies will discriminate harshly against multiple groups, groups that include a lot of men. Unless you specifically are white and rich and male (all of those, at the same time, no cherry-picking), then a new Trump presidency will not be in your best interests. And still, if you know any women, lgbt+ people, o…	/r/EverydayMisandry	23/08/24 05:35 PM
1	Got banned from a subreddit because of this Trump is also worse for men. Namely, that unless you're in the 1%, Trump does not care about you. His policies will work towards a worse economy and position in society for everyone that isn't among the fortunate few. For example, his tax breaks were chiefly for the few 1%'ers, and had little effect for everyone else. Worse yet is the looming threat of Project 2025. Trump has tried to distance himself from it, but it is literally his own former presidential staff that're all over it; the people …	/r/EverydayMisandry	23/08/24 06:12 AM
1	How do you respond intelligently to posts like this? I'll try and look into it when I have the time, thanks :)	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	17/08/24 08:22 PM
1	How do you respond intelligently to posts like this? Thanks for linking that document! Very interesting (and scary) reading. Although I have not read all of it in detail yet, I did not see any reference to actual violence statistics in the seemingly most relevant sections? Your numbers as you say you have collected them are still interesting, though - although I hope you'll forgive me for taking your personal, un-published research with a grain of salt :) It would seem that we can agree that incel-on-male violence is, at the very least, a prevalen…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	17/08/24 05:45 PM
1	How do you respond intelligently to posts like this? How so? I mean, do you have any idea of the motives of incels killing men? I could speculate, but since you seem to have some sort of stats in mind - you mention 90% - I'm thinking you might know. A source on this, if you have it, would be appreciated.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	17/08/24 02:59 PM
2	quick poll: would you date and/or have sex with a virgin man that is middle aged? Oh, alright. That sucks man :( But yeah, again, it's good to know your limits. Just try to not let them hinder or restrain you too much :)	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/08/24 06:33 PM
0	quick poll: would you date and/or have sex with a virgin man that is middle aged? Hmm, that's possible. I'd hope not, I mean, the question would imply for people to look beyond that. But you might be right; there's certainly a lot of, ah, that type around indeed. In my honest opinion though, I don't think most are that bad, but you certainly notice the assholes more.	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/08/24 06:11 PM
2	quick poll: would you date and/or have sex with a virgin man that is middle aged? Why, thank you!	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/08/24 06:07 PM
3	quick poll: would you date and/or have sex with a virgin man that is middle aged? First of all, it's great that you have that sort of self-insight to know you're not compatible. Too many men will hound women that they're not realistically compatible with. That being said, I'm not sure if your "aversion" to, say, hiking is because you yourself do not like it at all, or just because you're afraid you'd be a bother? Because a lot of women would appreciate a man willing to engage in activities she finds enjoyable, so then it becomes an issue of aligning expectations.	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/08/24 06:06 PM
3	quick poll: would you date and/or have sex with a virgin man that is middle aged? I can't help but worry that a dating app specifically for gamers would just attract a lot of the very worst of the men, and given that women are a clear minority among gamers, I fear it would just become a sausage-fest of savages and misogynists all hunting for a scant few women who are quickly scared away. Admittedly, what I just said includes a whole host of prejudices, but I'm thinking I'm not far from the truth. Well, you could of course just make it a thing that everyone list the games they…	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/08/24 06:02 PM
0	quick poll: would you date and/or have sex with a virgin man that is middle aged? Fair enough :)	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/08/24 05:45 PM
2	quick poll: would you date and/or have sex with a virgin man that is middle aged? And I’m only speaking for myself, but misanthropy and subscription to grift or conspiracies are total turnoffs. Lol. Yeah, I couldn't agree more. Dating 101 advice right there, I'd say. Thankfully the men in the latter camp reveal their character immediately and there is plenty of time to bail. Yep, agreed. (Well, I'm a man, but I'd say your statement still applies.) And speaking of Dating 101, "curiously" probing for such things, I think, might be a good idea. "What's your favourite conspiracy …	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/08/24 05:42 PM
2	quick poll: would you date and/or have sex with a virgin man that is middle aged? I mean, you are sort of contradicting yourself. On the one hand, you say that having had sex does not imply emotional maturity. On the other hand, you say that having been in sexual relationships does give that sort of experience. Your reasoning with how it hurt with the first relationship also doesn't make sense to me; that rather stems from people being young/immature/inexperienced in general, rather than lacking specific experience necessarily. I think emotional maturity and experience in how…	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/08/24 05:32 PM
19	quick poll: would you date and/or have sex with a virgin man that is middle aged? I love how you made those two first distinctions, that's great insight into the possible causes of why a man might be in that situation. I think some of the other respondents here have tended to assume the third case by default, and while that's valid in the sense that it's not uncommon, I also believe the first two are quite possible/likely as well. Not every man who's "behind" on that front is a literal incel (in the worst, misogynist definition), but there's unfortunately a big tendency for p…	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/08/24 04:59 PM
1	Not this shit again… As someone whose life has been utterly fucked up by neurodivergence in so many ways... This one is tough, honestly. For one, I absolutely agree with terminating a pregnancy if Down's Syndrome is detected. There is a really high risk that the child will face a really difficult and, in many ways, undignified life, IMHO - same for numerous other debilitating conditions. I see it as (potentially) selfish of the parents; their foremost concern should be their child's welfare above all else, yet still…	/r/EverydayMisandry	11/08/24 12:06 PM
1	Body shaming is ok when it’s against men I dislike!! Agreed 100%! And yes, not only is it body shaming and misandric, the cringe of it is another thing entirely. Unless of course it is, as you say, a riposte to ad hominems; that's one of the situations where it might be more acceptable, mainly because the situation then has already gone down the drain, and the target might need reminding of their own hubris. I'd still try and be a little more creative about it still, but yeah.	/r/EverydayMisandry	10/08/24 10:33 PM
1	Body shaming is ok when it’s against men I dislike!! You're confusing me a bit, lol. The way you're saying "the left", "the liberals" and unironically saying "red pill men" makes you come off as far-right and manosphere-adjacent, honestly, while your post history seems to suggest otherwise. (To be clear, I don't have a problem with someone being on the political right, nor the left, as long as it isn't taken too far. And to be doubly clear, I'm not making accusations - I'm just a bit confused.) Anyway, claiming it's "the liberals" saying such thin…	/r/EverydayMisandry	10/08/24 10:18 PM
1	Body shaming is ok when it’s against men I dislike!! You're not wrong, insofar as your overall point goes. I suppose that's another reason why I shouldn't do it, and won't, anymore. Fwiw, I did acknowledge that it was hypocritical. Thank goodness we get to be publicly racist, misandrist, sexist, bigoted, misogynist, verbally abusive to children, etc. I do want to clarify something here. You're implicitly over-exaggerating my propensity to do this sort of thing - even if you're only doing it to make a point. Regardless, I've said very clearly that …	/r/EverydayMisandry	10/08/24 09:24 PM
-1	Body shaming is ok when it’s against men I dislike!! A fair point, but I do sort of account for that with criteria #3 - that they're (clearly) projecting their own insecurities. Again, we're talking in-person here, and I'm usually very good a picking up that stuff. That's sort of the evil elegance of it - if they're deeply insecure, it's likely that they're gonna be hurt by it even if they know rationally that it's untrue. Of course you're right that, if they are highly self-assured on that front (for whatever reason), it falls flat. A point of cl…	/r/EverydayMisandry	10/08/24 08:42 PM
-5	Body shaming is ok when it’s against men I dislike!! I'm gonna confess here, knowing I'll probably get downvoted (but before you do, please read the whole comment), and say that I admittedly actually do, albeit very rarely, use this as an insult. For the vast majority of cases, I do agree that it's an insufferable insult that's wrong on so many levels. Yet, to me, there's these rare few instances where it seems deliciously appropriate, specifically when the guy is clearly: - blatantly misogynistic/otherwise a top-tier asshole, - that would likely …	/r/EverydayMisandry	10/08/24 04:04 PM
11	Body shaming is ok when it’s against men I dislike!! To be fair to Thunberg, what she said in that tweet, I believe, had nothing to do with the picture of Tate in swimwear - I believe that's a later thing added by a pundit to try and "underscore" the point. She was only commenting on Tate's (insufferable) boasting about his supposed car collection. The "prize" for ignorance about male anatomy goes to whoever made that composite image. ETA: But regardless, yes, you're right it's a personality thing.	/r/EverydayMisandry	10/08/24 03:04 PM
3	I guess I’m a criminal. I think you're right, that variation seems to ring a bell as well. It's a widespread experiment, indeed. The trust aspect is also interesting, but I don't remember much so I can't say much to it. But yeah, everyone needs to have it drilled into their brains to never take such promises at face value.	/r/EverydayMisandry	09/08/24 04:48 PM
3	I guess I’m a criminal. I don't believe it is true, and worse, it's overall a gross misrepresentation of the actual similar scientific experiments that've been done. I initially wrote a a full reply to you here, but I added it as a top-level comment instead: https://www.reddit.com/r/everydaymisandry/s/SmHMSatwR9	/r/EverydayMisandry	09/08/24 08:29 AM
4	I guess I’m a criminal. This is complete and utter horseshit, from a scientific standpoint. Now, to be fair, there is actually a similar (yet crucially different) real scientific experiment that's been done, I believe several times by different studies, but I've never heard of it being done to assess particularly gender differences in children. (It could have been. I just don't know.) So, the experiment is a classic in investigating impulse control, but is slightly but crucially different than what's portrayed in the p…	/r/EverydayMisandry	09/08/24 08:26 AM
3	Non problematic men are still often loop in with toxic masculinity, just because they have a few personality traits women don't find attractive in men? This is why I struggle to take some people using the term seriously. That's why I like to say that I support the concept of feminism but I don't support what it's become as a movement. I might just steal that one. I've long been looking for succinct ways to describe my stance on feminism that won't, or is at least less likely to offend someone. Agreed 100%, btw.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	07/08/24 11:42 PM
1	Another case of “feminists” having complete double standards. Polyamory in women is good, polyamory in men is bad. (This comes from the now-closed FDS sub and their website/forum) I mean, yes, men getting twice the prison time is indeed a worse issue, but it's still these crass remarks that are the topic of this post?	/r/EverydayMisandry	07/08/24 03:49 PM
2	Another case of “feminists” having complete double standards. Polyamory in women is good, polyamory in men is bad. (This comes from the now-closed FDS sub and their website/forum) If I saw a post that said "if a girl has an OF kick her to the curb" I wouldn't cry misogyny I respectfully disagree. While I recognise there can be significant differences in "what's allowed" in the context of, say, humour or whatever, generally I think that saying "kick her/him to the curb" (in relation to someone's assessment of a person) just implies a level of deep disdain that's indicative of intolerance. That just comes from me endavouring to being a very tolerant and open-minded person, …	/r/EverydayMisandry	07/08/24 11:33 AM
1	r/AskSocialScience user tries to find justification for why women are given more lenient sentences The comment you've replied to is basically outdated. I had the wrong impression of what 'instigated' means, or what they might've meant by it. In actuality, "provoking" could be a form of "instigating", at least in this context.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	04/08/24 02:08 AM
1	Over 100K likes OTC drug availability varies quite a lot in the EU, even. Denmark is very strict; a lot of pretty much harmless things like melatonin (sleep hormone) requires prescription here, whereas it's OTC in Germany. In some countries you can get big bottles of high-dose caffeine pills OTC... which is kinda insane, tbh, caffeine in high amounts isn't exactly risk-free, lol. paracetamol/acetaminophen Lol, I've always called it that, but this time I apparently just had to forget and only remember the longer…	/r/EverydayMisandry	03/08/24 11:41 PM
1	A question for feminist who claim feminism is about equality and that there is no need for a movement for equality. Here you go: the Gender-equality paradox (Wikipedia)	/r/MensRights	03/08/24 09:46 PM
2	Over 100K likes Sure! I'm not denying the whole "cry for help" phenomenon, to be perfectly clear; it was rather that guy's tone that made it sound like a gender war thing. But to add to what you're saying, a lot of them also underestimate just how long it'll actually take for some "popular options" to actually kill them. For example, for some reason a lot of people apparently use acetaminophen (mild painkillers; you can't get more than 10 OTC here in Denmark for this reason). But they don't realise it'll only a…	/r/EverydayMisandry	03/08/24 09:02 PM
1	Over 100K likes And assuming they survive, since men are less likely to seek help (even go to the doctor), and just talk about/recognise their problems in general, I'd expect self-reporting rates to be lower still, all else being equal.	/r/EverydayMisandry	03/08/24 08:47 PM
0	r/AskSocialScience user tries to find justification for why women are given more lenient sentences Right, thanks for clearing it up. Tbh, what you're saying here is what I thought you meant. And as I said in my reply to another reply to me, I'm a non-native English speaker, and sometimes I admittedly do get confused about the subtle nuances of some words. I did actually look it up, and the definition I saw there didn't immediately/clearly assuage my confusion, but I might've been biased in reading that by my confusion itself. So, FWIW, yes, I was "questioning your point"; however, my (admitte…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	03/08/24 03:39 PM
1	r/AskSocialScience user tries to find justification for why women are given more lenient sentences Right, I was not saying that there aren't female criminals like Tasmin Glass (although she's a great example indeed), but only that there are different ways 'instigated' can be interpreted. Or maybe there isn't? I'm a non-native speaker. Basically: What I'm thinking about is if this claim that MRAs are supposedly making is based on, for example, a survey of male convicted murderers asked about motive; - where both of the examples I provided are grouped together in the results as being "instigate…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	03/08/24 02:56 PM
6	r/AskSocialScience user tries to find justification for why women are given more lenient sentences How do you mean "instigated" in this context? Because depending on viewpoints, it could mean wildly different things; there's a rather big difference between a murder because of "competition over a woman" (the man chose to murder another man at their own behest) and "woman asked man to murder" (they directly ordered, suggested or encouraged a murder to be committed). Crucially, the latter is criminal for the woman, the former is not. Ignore this; there's no ambiguity in what "instigated" means (…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	03/08/24 02:08 PM
2	Over 100K likes I’m not a fan of the men v women war. Exactly this. Thank you.	/r/EverydayMisandry	02/08/24 08:57 AM
1	Over 100K likes it's a fact that some women use threats and attempts of suicide to get what they want... men virtually never do, they just kill themselves. Men can be passive-aggressive too, just not with suicide. It's a fact that some men do as well. Hate to break it to you, but I've heard those kinds of stories as well. It's not a gendered thing to be emotionally manipulative. Maybe go white-knight somewhere other than a subreddit dedicated to highlighting casual misandry. Yeah, I'm not for using an anti-misa…	/r/EverydayMisandry	01/08/24 07:53 PM
2	Over 100K likes It's correct that men generally choose more violent, and thus usually more effective, means of suicide. “saved” But I don't like their tone either.	/r/EverydayMisandry	01/08/24 06:32 AM
-2	Over 100K likes How many of those female suicide attempts are actually passive-aggressive cries for attention? What's your fucking point? Sounds like you're shaming women who attempt suicide? Don't fall into the fucking trap of needing to retaliate. Remember, my guy, we don't solve shit by hating back.	/r/EverydayMisandry	01/08/24 06:30 AM
2	The male gender role of being the stoic rock in a romantic relationship is the most pronounced example of emotional labour that exists in life, and those who believe women do more emotional labour on average are either lying or ignorant. They may think it's equal in their eyes but it's not. I could be wrong, but I think that was the point?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	25/07/24 06:04 PM
2	The male gender role of being the stoic rock in a romantic relationship is the most pronounced example of emotional labour that exists in life, and those who believe women do more emotional labour on average are either lying or ignorant. IMHO, it is part of how the capitalist oppressors are trying to distract us with the gender wars. I'll take "Weird conspiracy theories that doesn't hold up to basic scrutiny" for $100, Alex.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	25/07/24 05:58 PM
9	Misandry from a popular webcomics artist and more I say "I know women have it worse." I say it to preemptively cut off the inevitable variation of "women have it worse" downplaying crap that will soon after be thrown back. The fact that I have to say that just to have a chance to be able to have even a somewhat reasonable discussion is one of the reasons I get so frustrated with, frankly, even giving a shit about supporting women's rights sometimes. If women can't, or won't, acknowledge that men also have issues, why should I give a fuck that t…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	28/06/24 12:49 PM
17	Trans Men Are Our Greatest Allies it seems that we have higher amounts of trans women. Not really true, I just very recently found out. Here in Denmark, it's like 54%/46% trans women/men, according to the state health centre that handles these things. The people I was discussing it with were way more knowledgeable on the subject than me, but we agreed that the reason for the phenomenon of trans women seeming more prevalent is because they are indeed seen more, in the sense that they likely "stick out" more, due to it typically b…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	24/04/24 10:51 PM
30	Trans Men Are Our Greatest Allies Cis-man here. You and your fellow much-welcome "adoptees" are absolutely real men, and I would absolutely fight for your right to be considered as such. Thank you for reminding me of this issue.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	24/04/24 10:39 PM