TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

suninabox Archive

View 0 posts and 67 comments by suninabox on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

You might be more anxious in Nigeria than Australia, but the average Australian is a lot more anxious than the average Nigerian. You develop your anxiety tolerance in the environment you were raised in, and if you're raised in a very safe and prosperous area your tolerance gets set low. The kind of things you would worry about in Nigeria, Nigerians don't worry about because its just normal/expected to them. Specifically, there was a higher proportion of people in higher-income countries with gen…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/20 06:38 PM
1

Which wouldn't make sense for them to because they have so many more options than guys. Again that's not how anxiety works, its like saying people in Australia should have less anxiety than people in Nigeria because Australia is rich and safe whereas Nigeria is poor and has rampant crime and corruption so there's lots more to worry about.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/20 03:23 PM
1

Anxiety isn't based on objective levels of risk/danger. The places with the highest rates of anxiety are some of the safest places in the world. The less threats and adversity you have to deal with the more sensitive you get, which makes you more prone to anxiety, not less. Womens approach anxiety isn't about being attacked, its about being rejected. You might say women are less likely to get rejected but that's exactly why they're more anxious about approaching. Guys are used to making the firs…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/20 02:33 PM
1

The abundant choice on dating apps isn't an unmitigated good. It also means a lot of time wasting and uncertainty and anxiety. Photos are a thin slice of someone and can be faked, there's always a chance of meeting up with a psycho and having a terrible time. Even if they meet up with a great good looking guy, if he's on a dating app he's probably swamped with matches too, which is why one of women's primary complaints about dating apps is how every guy (they swipe on) plays games/is a fuccboi/w…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/20 08:08 PM
0

Men are more at risk of being attacked and killed by strangers than women are. Men don't find it threatening because its a rare affirmation of their sexual attractiveness in a world in which they are largely invisible unless they make the effort to be recognized, and because no one gets raped in the middle of a crowded gym/bus/bar. If there were as many gay men as there are heterosexual men then they'd probably have all the same complaints women have about being drowned in unwanted male attentio…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/20 07:53 PM
2

People get choosier the more options they have. Picking the best looking guy in the bar and it might be 1 out of 20 guys, and on a given night he might not be that good looking. If you're on Tinder and you have thousands of guys swiping right on you, you can't date all of them so why wouldn't you also just go for the top 1-5 guys in your matches at any one time? It's not like they're going to go on hundreds of dates a month just to give the average guys a shot.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/20 07:41 PM
1

So...you get objectified whatever you wear and however you look. This can't be true unless men also get groped and cat-called an equal amount, since if you're a woman that passes for a man you will get treated like a man. Looks obviously have something to do with it. It's just not as simple as "any woman in a low cut top is automatically going to get groped and any woman in jeans and a t-shirt is automatically hideous to all men"
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/20 07:24 PM
1

Foreskin adds maybe .5 seconds to the time it takes to spend washing your dick. You said you don't want to be bald, how long do you spend washing, drying, combing your hair?
/r/PussyPassDenied06/10/17 11:54 AM
1

You have to wash your dick whether its circumcised or uncircumcised. you claimed "my circumcised dick is hassle free". What hassle do you think you're avoiding if its not washing?
/r/PussyPassDenied05/10/17 01:42 PM
0

There's always at least one guy in every thread (that gets derailed into circumcision talk) that says he got it done as an adult and sex is just as enjoyable I mean anecdotes aren't that reliable, there's obvious reasons someone who chose to get a circumcision later in life wouldn't want to admit it made sex worse. there's been studies on it, there's no question it makes your dick less sensitive: https://www.webmd.com/men/news/20040202/adult-circumcision-affects-sexual-performance#1 You can see …
/r/PussyPassDenied05/10/17 01:33 PM
1

Easy, I've never had cancer but I'm glad I don't have it. I've never had bunions but I'm glad I don't have them. You're comparing diseases to a natural part of your body. None of those analogies work because they're not something natural that is removed at birth without your consent. The analogy would be if your parents removed your hair with a laser as a child because they considered having hair dirty and a hassle to keep clean, and you were here saying you're glad your parents had your hair re…
/r/PussyPassDenied05/10/17 01:26 PM
5

You ever considered that some people are actually glad they don't have foreskin? How could you be glad if you never had a choice and never knew any different? What do you have to compare it to? If people who cut their foreskin off as adults said they were glad they did it I would take the recommendation more seriously. But almost no one actually chooses to get circumcised as an adult which says a lot about whether its actually worthwhile. If its such an obviously good decision then why isn't it …
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/17 07:51 PM
–

Getting elbow deep in cow shit is less cute than laminar flow though.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/03/17 10:17 PM
2

What strawman? You asked how many of the graduates were women and I told you. What I actually did was a steelman. I took a bullshit argument (women don't do hard things and quit hard courses) and turned it into a halfway passable one (women drop out of hard work so they can have kids). Having a kid is probably easier than being a vet BTWs
/r/PussyPassDenied14/03/17 08:27 PM
1

Most of the graduates are as well. If you actually wanted to make your point you could choose to focus on the fact that a lot of women drop out of their careers to have kids, but then that requires you to think having a kid is easy.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/03/17 08:21 PM
–

As it turns out, engineering isn't fucking easy. And most people (men AND women) just want to take the easy way. The difference is, women have the luxury of just finding a partner. Men either work or starve That's not a very good explanation. The vast majority of veterinary students are women, and training to be a vet is a lot longer and harder than doing sociology or media studies or some other bullshit humanity.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/03/17 08:08 PM
1

Keep avoiding the question.
/r/MensRights02/03/17 05:53 PM
1

If you're incapable of defining a criteria for "evidence" other than "source" then you don't know what you'e talking about.
/r/MensRights02/03/17 05:19 PM
1

The only evidence you asked for last time was "source?" Can you find me a source that proves Trump admitting he's a pedo would damage his credibility? If you can't you're using a ridiculous standard of evidence for very simple and uncontroversial claims.
/r/MensRights02/03/17 04:38 PM
1

Different standards of claim have different standards of evidence. If you think you need a peer reviewed research paper to show that Trump saying "I rape little kids" on national TV wouldn't damage his credibility then you should get out of politics pronto because there's very little political opinion you can back up with that standard of evidence, because qualitative aspects of human behavior are not quantifiable or repeatable enough to run valid experiments on. You're dismissing entire fields …
/r/MensRights02/03/17 03:34 PM
–

Yes, I used basic reason and experience of the world and people, and how mens rights is talked about in the mainstream media to surmise that complaining about "straight men are bad at sex" clickbait articles is not going to convince anyone to take mens rights seriously. Can you present an argument for how complaining about clickbait will convince anyone who doesn't already take mens rights seriously to take mens rights seriously? Although before you mentioned that you automatically write off any…
/r/MensRights01/03/17 10:55 PM
–

Do you have a source that could show that President Trump running across the White House lawn naked whilst strumming his cock and singing "WILLY BANJO!" would hurt his credibility? Does that mean you're ambivalent to the prospect of whether that would or would not hurt his credibility? It's an opinion, not an objective fact. If you're going to reduce politics to "you can only say things that are demonstrably falsifiable" then I have no idea why you're talking about it because 99% of interesting …
/r/MensRights01/03/17 10:29 PM
–

People who claim that don't need ammunition It's still dumb even if you don't believe it undermines the credibility of the cause (which it does). Institutional discrimination in the court system is absolutely the strongest argument for mens rights, any time you're diluting it with fluff like "some clickbait merchant wrote a dumb argument" you're downplaying the seriousness of the issue by putting it on nonsense.
/r/MensRights01/03/17 10:16 PM
–

I don't think focussing on petty clickbait like this is going to convince people to care, it just makes mens rights seem trivial and whiny. It's ammunition to people who want to claim there are no real human rights issues for men.
/r/MensRights01/03/17 06:06 PM
–

Why is the first post I'm seeing on /r/all from MensRights in a long while about some bullshit clickbait article instead of something actually important like sentencing disparity between men and women, or disproportionately allocated resources for domestic violence sufferers? What "right" is this violating? Do you think people shouldn't allowed to say dumb sexist things?
/r/MensRights28/02/17 06:34 PM
1

Is americanews.com a reputable group of news journalists or is it a site that just reblogs news from other sites? The story happened in the UK, was originally reported by UK news organizations who made no mention of them watching it go down, and in fact go into specific detail (that they left the dog unattended to go to a barbecue) that is mutually exclusive with the claim they watched. Is it likely that both the original source and some american blog both redacted the true story, and replaced i…
/r/PussyPass09/11/15 04:26 PM
0

I think she should have gone to jail. For the crime defrauding the taxpayer, the taxpayer should pay even more to keep her in prison? It costs £65,000 to imprison someone in the UK, and £40,000 a year on top of that. 1 year of prison would cost more than she defrauded in 3 years.
/r/PussyPass08/11/15 11:41 PM
1

You think maybe it was removed because it was bullshit?
/r/PussyPass08/11/15 11:31 PM
-5

Moving when you're not supposed to (even when 50,000 volts are passing through your body) = resisting arrest = officer feared for their safety = justifiably use of deadly force. However in this case what did for him is appearing to reach for a pocket. Putting your hands in your pockets = suspect was acting suspiciously and made a sudden movement as if to pull out a gun = officer feared for their safety = justifiable use of deadly force. Another good trick is to constantly shout things like "STOP…
/r/PussyPass06/11/15 02:36 PM
-3

Cause male cops never get let off from killing people? Have a look at /r/bad_cop_no_donut if you think this is a pussy pass.
/r/PussyPass06/11/15 02:25 PM
1

It's the fact that when she shot those men, and the police arrested her and asked why she did it, she told them to read her manifesto. Mark Chapman was reading a copy of Catcher in the Rye when police found him, and he said he did it so more people would read Catcher in the Rye. Does that mean without Catcher in the Rye he wouldn't have killed? Does her manifesto say the real reason she shot Warhol that was completely separate from her delusions of persecution by him and her resentment to his su…
/r/PussyPass06/11/15 01:10 AM
0

Yeah. Why do you think that's relevant to anything I've said? Are you trying to say that even though Solonas only ever tried to kill people because she believed they were stealing from her, that radical feminism was the cause of the killing? That even though never in her life did she try to kill someone to make a political point, that radical feminism somehow made her want to kill and that if it wasn't for her radfem beliefs, then this schizophrenic, homeless, prostitute would never have tried t…
/r/PussyPass06/11/15 12:58 AM
1

People don't spring up out of a vacuum Yeah, it was quite clearly over a dispute about money. Violence and murders over money and conflict over money are far more common than politically motivated violence. In fact Valerie Solonas has a lot more in common with Mark Chapman than an Islamic terrorist. You could claim that since Mark Chapman was a Christian and was angry that John Lennon said he was bigger than the Jesus, then it was his pastor who incited him to violence because he encouraged him …
/r/PussyPass05/11/15 10:37 PM
0

If it incited another Valerie Solanas type shooting we'd all be wondering why didn't they see it coming. It's been 47 years since Valerie Solanas shot Andy Warhol. We don't have to say "if". Crazy radical feminist screeds have only become more widely disseminated since then. If radical feminism was likely to incite violence, shouldn't it have happened by now? Valerie Solanas was also a schizophrenic, homeless prostitute, who was specifically trying to kill Warhol because she was deluded into thi…
/r/PussyPass04/11/15 11:06 PM
-1

They have rules against hate speech likely to incite violence in that country, and she was hashtagging "#killallwhitemen. Do you think it was likely some radical feminists were going to go out and kill some white men as a result of this? Or in fact do anything in the real world instead of writing on their tumblrs? I'm all for the equal application of law, and this was hardly a fanatic muslim cleric telling fundamentalist followers to go out and kill infidels.
/r/PussyPass04/11/15 06:23 PM
1

Shit that must be why someone asked what grades are equivalent to in America, because every country in the world uses the grade system.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 06:24 PM
3

22 years is 7 years more than the set sentence for 2nd degree murder in California. You're absolutely batshit if you think a teacher consensually fucking their students is 147% worse than taking a life.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 06:19 PM
2

OMG we need to make sure the age of consent is 18 in New York! Only when the law is fucking over everyone equally will things get better! /s
/r/MensRights04/07/15 06:15 PM
1

The law is the law. People said that to justify killing runaway slaves. "They knew the consequences and they did it anyway!". Try using your brain.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 06:13 PM
2

That's what makes me happy about seeing substantial sentences for female predators - that it's actually being acknowledged that protecting boys is important. Being happy about injustices because you think it might somehow lead to less injustices is fucked up. This is like saying you'd be glad if a country that had the death penalty for being gay started executing straight people as well, because it would be equal and would show how wrong it is to execute people for their sexuality. Except it ign…
/r/MensRights04/07/15 06:09 PM
1

So if you lived in a country where homosexuality had the death penalty, you'd be advocating for the death penalty for straight people in the name of equality?
/r/MensRights04/07/15 06:06 PM
0

So if we lived in a country with a crazy dictator who decided to start executing people for being gay (somethings that is the case in many countries), you'd be glad if he started executing people for being straight in the name of equality? Anytime you're glad of injustices is time to pause and reconsider.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 05:59 PM
0

She wasn't being prosecuted for those allegations. Punishing someone for a crime they are not on trial for is bullshit.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 05:56 PM
2

Not everywhere in the world has the same school system as America?
/r/MensRights04/07/15 05:54 PM
0

did you never have sex before the legal age? Was it rape?
/r/MensRights04/07/15 05:52 PM
2

waaaaaaaaay up
/r/PussyPassDenied19/02/15 02:08 AM
1

How up did you manage to fuck it?
/r/PussyPassDenied19/02/15 01:59 AM
-2

Have you ever actually fucked someone's ass up?
/r/PussyPassDenied18/02/15 08:35 PM
1

But who cares, she probably doesn't have any property to sue her for anyway. We all know why, right guys? RIGHT?
/r/PussyPass26/07/14 07:39 PM
1

Do you know what this students name was? Albert Einstein.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 10:32 PM
0

Maybe you should take some time out to fixing your bullshit detector while you're at it.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 10:31 PM
3

Actually, in light of human social dynamics this isn't a particularly useful guide. People generally bond with others they spend any significant amount of time around. Therefore in light of this there are significant benefits to "not crashing" since you're making your chance of winning the "race" higher every time you finish a lap. Let's say "trying hard" gives you a 50% chance of getting laid on the first date, and 50% chance of being completely rejected. However taking a relaxed approach gives…
/r/seduction13/02/12 02:37 AM
1

Joking about things like rape and kidnapping (even if it's genuinely intended as a joke) can still be intimidating, scary and disturbing Anything can be intimidating, scary, and disturbing. People who are afraid of dogs can be intimidated by pictures of dogs. Doesn't mean people who post pictures of dogs online are assholes. Just because some people have been raped and are therefore sensitive to the issue of rape, doesn't mean the rest of us shouldn't be allowed to make jokes about it. Just in t…
/r/MensRights12/02/12 11:02 PM
0

There's no harm if you want to spend your time like that. I was merely pointing out that it is in fact remarkably easy to lie about rape, and given the large number of things that are lied about on the internet, presumably a significant % of rape claims are as well. I would assume roughly in line with the amount of people who claim to have been shot or robbed.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 06:25 PM
2

I guess I was just trying to avoid having to fully embrace what a piece of shit a huge amount of redditors are. Most people are good people. Most redditors are good people. You're taking things far too seriously and suffering from the illusion of asymmetric insight. You seem unwilling to take people at their intentions, or at the least want to focus on a minority of mainly trolls and exaggeration and maybe 0.001% genuinely hateful people and act like thats the norm.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 06:24 PM
2

Any example of that? Don't think I've ever said you can't joke about something. Might have said it was a shit joke but I don't recall ever saying you can't joke about X without supporting X.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 06:22 PM
0

Maybe this will make me feel better, but I doubt it. Last night my boyfriend sexually assaulted me. He's been pressuring me to do anal for a while, but I told him I wasn't into it. I guess he got sick of waiting cause last night he went ahead with it anyway. I asked him to stop but he just kept going, so I just lied still and waited for him to finish. We didn't talk afterwards, I just went straight to sleep and got out as soon as I could in the morning. I'm feeling really dirty and degraded righ…
/r/MensRights11/02/12 05:22 PM
0

Who the fuck is going to lie about being raped on the internet I've been gang raped by 12 black guys. There, I just did it.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 05:07 PM
0

This one: What my super religious mother got me for Christmas. I didn't notice any comments calling her a whore or threatening to kill her, but there were a few "joking" rape/kidnapping threats. Why is joking in quotations? If you read the context of the comments they very clearly are jokes. Only someone with the worlds largest stick up their ass, dead set on finding enemies and intolerance where there are/is none would think otherwise. Either that or someone can't see how you can unseriously jo…
/r/MensRights11/02/12 04:09 PM
1

That image of a "muslim" had a sword. A fucking sword. It's a metaphorical representation of "behead those who insult islam". Kinda hard to draw someone wielding a guillotine. As for the generalized comments, It's a cartoon. If you're looking for a nuanced detail of a complex geo-political situation, you're looking in the wrong place. Just go look at the cartoons that get posted on /r/politics. They're crass stereotypes for the most part but they have their place.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 04:02 PM
3

verbal rapist TIL you can rape with words. What's next? a verbal murderer? a verbal thief perhaps? that kind of linguistic hyperbole is an insult to actual rape victims. dozens of people have told me to kill myself in my tenure of the internet, and not once did I feel the need to call them a murderer. Someone who says "go kill yourself" or "go get raped" is not being a murderer or a rapist, they're just being a dick. You take internet banter that seriously you might as well disconnect from the g…
/r/MensRights11/02/12 03:54 PM
2

You don't get to say "be cool" and then pass in some condescending last word "don't let me catch you acting how I don't want" at the same time. That cake is well and truly eaten.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 03:53 PM
1

It's because women don't just "fuck", they fuck with gaining an advantage in mind. Wow. Can a sex positive woman step in here, because I'm speechless that someone with an internet connection could manage to form such an opinion. NOT ALL WOMEN ARE THE SAME.
/r/MensRights04/10/10 09:06 PM
–

Correlation != Causation.
/r/MensRights17/09/10 11:51 AM
26

This is probably one of the most clear and well written arguments I've ever seen on reddit. Same crimes deserve same sentences. Doesn't matter what gender or race the perp is. If a woman is mentally ill, then she should get the same sentence as a mentally ill man. Any assumption that women are inherently less culpable for their crimes can only lead to injustice. Nothing should be assumed in justice. Go on evidence and the individual circumstances.
/r/MensRights11/09/10 06:31 PM
3

Disown your mother immediately if she doesn't stop this insanity.... Oh wait, you already have. Kudos. Good to see someone not letting "family" get in the way of avoiding fucked up people, hope your dad makes it out okay.
/r/MensRights06/09/10 01:01 PM
17

"My girlfriends told me Tony forced himself on me, but I'm not sure if that's what they really believed or if they were just trying to protect my feelings." It seems social attitudes towards female sexuality are causing a lot of confusion in these debates. There should be no motivation to "protect" her feelings, because there shouldn't be any negative feelings associated with consensual sex. No one should lie, and say that a guy did rape her, just to spare feelings of shame surrounding sex. The …
/r/MensRights03/09/10 01:23 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter