TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

superkatzenkamikaze Archive

View 0 posts and 105 comments by superkatzenkamikaze on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

So… barely? The newest post in that subreddit was 4yrs ago. Whatever, a pedo is a pedo, they should have the same fate as the men. It’s usually conservative men who consider teenage boys who are victims of rape by an older woman as “lucky”. Part of the whole machismo bit.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/26 01:13 AM
1

If the sample wasn’t properly managed you definitely cannot draw any conclusions from it, LOL. That threat already eliminated the sample of people who didn’t settle for stability’s sake. So it’s flawed by definition.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 12:06 PM
1

Plenty of stray tomcats with AIDS covered in shit who ultimately got someone to settle for them out there. It goes both ways. Men are messy also.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 12:03 PM
–

So no example of a female version of Elliot Rogers? 🙃 Who would’ve thunk… Not systemically they don’t, LOL. Still not extremism. And men abuse women in those ways also, among many others, much more than women do. Men are the ones getting more and more radicalized, extremist and dangerous to society. Which is what will paradoxically keep them away from the women they so desperately crave forever.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 04:20 PM
–

The idea in and of itself. Wanting cannot be controlled nor altered.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 04:09 PM
–

And how many women were involved when defining how the military should work, again? Who decided the lower echelons of men have to be cannon fodder? 🙃 Women? Those filthy feminists? 😂😂😂 You don’t even know who you’re mad at.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 04:08 PM
–

LOL, who is the female version of Elliot Rogers, then? Please, illuminate. Nope, having a dismissive or even nasty attitude is not extremism, obviously. Hitting is obviously always wrong, but men still hit women way more than the other way around, so you lack a point again. 🙃
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 04:06 PM
–

It's hilarious, actually. And completely ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 03:46 PM
–

Are men not part of society? LOL. They created this dynamic in order to control one another and us and now they're the ones bitching about it. How about you define how you'd like to be treated socially and to start working towards that change?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 03:44 PM
–

What would men be fine with outside getting married and having a family, then? Because that just won't be an option for many of them, they'll have to find some sort of occupation and coping mechanism that isn't so destructive and antisocial.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 03:41 PM
–

Women need to fix what, exactly? Not wanting men? LOL
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 03:33 PM
–

That's barely anything, definitely not radical or extremist behaviour. Women are just not deferent towards men anymore, that's a very good thing. No woman ever shot up random people because she wasn't given the time of day by men.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 03:30 PM
9

We don’t need men with bigger egos than they already have. Also, ONS are not as common as you think. Most of what you’re saying here is just regurgitated incel rhetoric, it simply has nothing to do with reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 07:09 PM
0

The social constructs we have in place allow women to express emotion more freely. It’s not ridiculous, it’s fact. Men and women are different in many ways, emotionality is not one of them. We have the same emotions and experience them similarly. More men would cry publicly if it were considered masculine and socially acceptable. There’s nothing wrong with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 01:40 PM
-1

Women cry more than men only because of the social constructs we have, we’re allowed to more. I don’t believe any one gender cries more than the other naturally, and no one should ever cry if they don’t want to. Once again, from my perspective gendering crying is just imbecilic.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 01:06 PM
0

I don’t think so. Not if both women and men have a safe space to do it. I had an ex who felt comfortable enough around me to cry, he really let it go in the beginning, he just had so much pent up. I saw my dad cry only 3 times, but I did see him hold back tears and turn them into anger a lot. This is, of course, anecdotal, but both sexes experience emotions largely the same. We should all be able to cry when we need to, it’s just good for us to let at least part of that tension and pain go.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 11:52 AM
2

I just do it to release the tension so I can better focus on the issue afterwards. It’s hygienic. Gendering crying makes literally 0 sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 10:49 AM
–

So you’d rather suffer and keep the status quo than make a change that will definitely benefit men, but *might* also benefit women? Just out of spite? This makes no sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 10:44 AM
7

Nope, it’s for the police to determine that. And no, you cannot in good faith correlate the conversation initiated from the prompt you offered with what you later commented, i.e. submission is an “expression of love”, love is submissive, or any of that. Not even the feminism part. Once again, if you want to know an answer, ask the question properly. This subterfuge strategy is completely ineffective.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 08:44 AM
9

No, that still doesn’t give you the authority to declare what they do or don’t understand. They have their POV and you have yours, that is it. Okay, that’s all good and well, but the you cannot correlate the answers you get here with women’s availability for denying equality, submission and exclusive childcare because you never mentioned it. It doesn’t even remotely resemble the choice women have nowadays simply because love and submission are different phenomena altogether.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 08:23 AM
8

Neither of us have the authority to declare something as understood or misunderstood. At most you could say that their understanding differs from your own. Either way, you launched the hypothetical as incomplete. This one won’t answer you if the people in this forum see submission and exclusive childcare as an “expression of love” as you do, or as “exploited slave”, or if it’s something else they might articulate. And you won’t know how this particular “expression of love” might affect their cho…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 08:01 AM
9

Interesting. If this is the genesis of the hypothetical, I can’t help but wonder: why did you leave the submission and exclusive childcare bits out? Those are big factors, the conversation might be very different if the hypothetical would be complete.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 07:30 AM
2

Yeah, I used the term wrong, I meant it like telling-off. Sorry about that, English is my third language. To reiterate: asking her if she thinks ALL people feel the same comes off as telling-off, which is not neutral at all, it implies disapproval. Maybe ask what you were going to ask directly.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 07:01 AM
7

You’re not here to show disapproval either, you’re supposed to be a neutral party and withhold any judgement. Being standoffish is a clear sign of disapproval.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 06:50 AM
7

Then maybe ask that directly, only asking if she thinks it applies to all people comes off as a bit standoffish.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 06:41 AM
3

Oof, I’d still chose the social life and career even so, though I’d be a bit sad about it. Good thing this doesn’t apply in real life, huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 06:37 AM
6

It’s your hypothetical, I can’t give you recommendations because I have no way of knowing what you want to say. I simply quoted your verbiage when commenting on your hypothetical. If you meant something else you need to figure that out yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 06:36 AM
9

Genuine intention of exploring people’s preferences to your hypothetical w/o judgement.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 06:33 AM
7

Why does it matter if it applies to ALL people or not?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 06:32 AM
4

Okay, just to clarify, in your hypothetical having donor kids or adopting are also off the table if you choose social life and career?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 06:30 AM
6

Quoting the OP. That was the exact verbiage you used.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 06:22 AM
11

Yeah, it’s the same thing, one is plural and the other singular. Thus the lives vs life.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 06:18 AM
17

Because that’s just what happens when you have no income and/or support network. You become extraordinarily vulnerable, then any small trespassing becomes a very big deal for you. And “loves of lives” usually don’t stop at small trespassings. Love fades, a healthy social life does not.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 05:15 AM
3

Sounds reasonable.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/26 03:17 PM
4

This is imbecilic, I’ll say it again: the issue here is strictly men’s maladaptive, abusive and ineffective communication patterns. Stop trying to drag women into this, LOL. It’s not gonna work. Once again, those are false equivalencies, false information in general and also irrelevant to the subject in question. Your hate/disdain towards women won’t get you out of it. 😂 You’re doing this to yourselves. And it sure as hell doesn’t prevent lying and backstabbing, you’re still doing that a lot to …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 06:06 PM
4

Again, you’re pulling information out of thin air and trying to introduce non-facts as false equivalences. Men and women lie and manipulate in relationships just as much. The issue here is that men have an abusive and ineffective communication pattern they’re not addressing and that’s affecting all of us. That’s the subject of the convo. Stop trying to introduce false affirmations to distract from this and focus on the subject. You’re literally trying to lie and manipulate right now, ironically.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 05:47 PM
7

Yeah, please spare us the armchair psychology non-facts, you clearly pulled these out of your bottom in a desperate attempt to confirm your bias. No, women do not lie all the time, women and men lie more or less the same. Not the subject of the post though, we are now discussing the maladaptive communication skills of men. 🙃
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 04:22 PM
4

What OP described is neither valid, healthy criticism nor holding someone accountable. It’s just gratuitous abuse, mainly done so the abuser can feel superior. Disgusting. Women don’t lie as you say, we simply have more efficient, non-alienating ways of communicating. The talking of shit behind someone’s back is being done by both sexes as far as I saw, pretty much equally m. That’s horrible in and of its own, but not a gendered thing. Men do it as much as women. And it’s not the subject of the …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 04:16 PM
6

Being a man sounds like a horrendous experience. This style of communication is not only damaging but ineffective. Maybe learn to communicate better amongst yourselves also?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 06:36 AM
2

You should date more men then, they’ll tell you all about how great they think Tate is. Or at least try and defend him. Like him or don’t, a lot of men nowadays would call him their model. Once again, not sure what kind of romance novels you’re into, never heard of the tropes you’re describing, really doubt they’re mainstream in any way. And those characters might be buff physically but emotionally sensitive, some “he’s not as bad as he looks” fantasy. Which is different from what men view as tr…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 06:09 AM
1

Dunno what kind of romance books you’re reading, buddy, but I can assure that most of them and also the most read and appreciated ones don’t star SEALs or Andrew Tate types.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 09:37 AM
4

The way women view masculinity, traditional or otherwise, and the way men view masculinity, traditional or otherwise, is very, very different. Also, crave is a strong word, it’s more like would like to. Most women and young girls don’t dream about Prince Charming anymore, that trope is more or less gone.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 09:16 AM
1

My ex only started becoming abusive after 2 years of relationship. There were no signs until then, he was a a nice nerdy guy by all intents and purposes. My aunt’s ex husband only started severely beating her after she was 7 months pregnant. Again, no signs before that. There are countless examples like that. Many abusive men wait until you are in your most vulnerable position and only then show their hand. How do you propose women detect and avoid this? All I can think of is not date at all, or…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/26 05:12 AM
–

On basis of their gender? How so? Please feel free to prove it then. :)
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 03:03 PM
0

LOL, I’m not an U.S. citizen, your legislation means nothing to me. It’s not in violation of anyone’s rights in Europe, nor I think anywhere else in the world. Maybe you just need to formulate your laws better, the U.S. always seems to have drama around badly written or implemented legislation. Feminism and the issues we’re discussing are very much global.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 06:44 PM
2

I do support the gender quota as long as it’s sensibly set, though. Also race and sexual orientation quotas. Truth is, if we didn’t have these set in place we’d have overqualified women, POC and LGBT people shunned away as it happened in the past. There’s no other way to enforce equity, unfortunately, at least none that actually works. There are plenty of qualified and overqualified women to fill those positions and there’s still plenty of room for qualified men. Ensuring equity for women is not…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 03:50 PM
1

If there is absolutely no difference between their qualifications and are both equally personable (impossible, but let say it’s so for the sake of the argument), then whichever one I want or feel like. I’d eeny meeny minie mo that, probably. I am supporting and donating towards women’s education and professional advancement wholeheartedly, though. The issue is systemic, not concrete. How do you find that’s discriminating against men, again? You never answered my question.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 02:58 PM
2

How is supporting women discriminating towards men?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 02:37 PM
-1

Didn’t say they are never discriminated against, just seldom. Which is true. And the kind of discrimination men face is usually much less systemic and/or damaging than the kind women face.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 02:36 PM
4

LOL, are we for real? Sure, here are my answers as a staunch feminist: Is misandry a real issue? Not really . Can men be discriminated on basis of their gender? Seldom. Do you support policies that encourage hiring/promoting women, female only scholarships? Yes. Are female-free spaces justified? And if no, why male free are allowed? Yes, both are justified generally. Some exceptions may apply, depends on the context. Do you support policies like Duluth model where domestic violence is strictly g…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 12:37 PM
-1

Have you guys ever considered just getting some hobbies and letting things fall into place, whatever happens? This obsession seems counterproductive. I’ve been following this sub for a while, it seems to me that most people here are confused and exhausted.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 05:00 PM
3

Tbh I’ve long suspected I’m borderline and therefore experience sex as simultaneously a source of validation and a terrifyingly vital expression of exploitation and abuse underlying all human interaction because I live and breath ambivalence Oof, sucks to be you. But it does explain a lot. And what do you feel it validates, exactly? I absolutely do envy women and gay men for so effortlessly getting it wherever they want and am baffled that women don’t take more advantage of this while they’re st…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 08:25 AM
7

Personally if I were a straight woman I’d have a coital encounter with an attractive man scheduled for every spare hour not spent studying subjects about which I’m passionate or grifting a man uglier than I Very interesting - would you say you view intercourse as more of a mechanical act? Would you say that you're even a little bit envious of the women who act like this? Why would it be wrong for women to simply take themselves off the sexual market overall and just focus on doing their own thin…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 01:51 PM
8

And how does that prove anything? The risk is still there, even if you had a couple of relatives who experienced something different. My grandmother had 13 kids and died surrounded by family as well, she also her the spine and hands completely f-ed up from birthing so many times. She was very unhappy by the end. It’s simple, whoever wants kids should have them and whoever doesn’t shouldn’t. Not everyone is into that whole family thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 04:14 PM
–

Let's say a man is single, he should be given a woman. And for a woman the opposite. I'm not sure if how many women are single they are probably a rare breed. What if an individual doesn't want to be in a relationship at all? What should the rules be regarding DV and mistreatment in general in government facilitated relationships? How do you think the government could facilitate said relationships per se, without infringing over anyone's liberty and free will?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 11:22 AM
–

The type of guy OP is referring to is always a POS. Chastising a virgin for being to wet is a POS move in and of itself, especially when you know that it actually matters for both of you. Which part do you find even remotely redeeming about these type of imbeciles?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 11:42 AM
–

Read the post again, OP said that the woman “ruined” themselves after the first encounter with a potentially unappreciative man that thinks sex with a virgin implies a lot of blood, pain and tightness. Which is fair, if you’d kept yourself a virgin because it mattered to you and you chose partner for whom it also matters, only to be chastised afterward for getting exited and being “too wet and loose”, you might consider it ruining your virginity on an idiot.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 11:27 AM
1

I already did. I don’t think these are analogous. Your baby isn’t a parasite, and you have a duty to care for your children. It's irrelevant whether you think they are analogous or not. I asked you to clarify why you answered no to the questions, those being why can't I have access to your bone marrow without your consent if I need it to live and why calling the ambulance for a stranger is not the same as having your bone marrow harvested without your consent or having to keep a parasite inside …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 02:24 PM
1

Hang on lemme show you how easy this is, this is actually a great opportunity for me to teach you something so take notes and learn from your betters. This is fair. You pump yourself up, little man. Clearly, you need it. 🤣 Nope Not enough, why not? 😂 For both questions, in detail, please. Learn to articulate your thoughts. You still can not provide a counter to save your life, huh? Also this might not seem relevant but it is. Can I ask your thoughts on the lockdowns during Covid, and the mask ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 09:23 PM
1

You forgot to answer the questions or provide an answer, pal. Go back and regroup. Aham. I asked this before, you conveniently ignored me: does calling the ambulance for a stranger in distress (which, again, is a simple action, it does not constitute care per se) equate with having your bone marrow forcefully harvested, or having to keep a parasite inside of your body by force? And if bodily autonomy doesn’t exist, do I get access to your bone marrow whenever I might need it to live, without nee…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 02:19 PM
1

What are you talking about? I’m not sure why you’re projecting your own thoughts onto me. Classic deflection using half-understood psychology jargon. Ugh, please, spare yourself the embarrassment. Even if I do accept your answer, you’re still literally saying you’re obligated to care for other people and thus you don’t have bodily autonomy, I just want you to say yes or no because it’s more applicable. I’m not sure why this is so hard to understand. If people are obligated to provide care for ot…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 06:57 PM
1

Bud, all I know is you can NOT provide a counter to save your life. 😂 That bathtub argument is one of the oldest tricks in the book and easily combatable, as I already did a few times. You're just a very sore loser. 🫶
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 04:31 PM
1

Seems like you got a bit mad there. Your writing logic went right out the window. I think anyone can see that you're trying to get an answer tailored to your needs because you're incapable of providing a counter to the existing answer. You ignored countless arguments and only barely countered the ones you felt you could, I allowed you to cherry-pick the direction, and you're still incapable of bringing forth even one single solid argument or counter. I think you got enough passes. This is not a …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 04:18 PM
1

I did, bud.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 04:01 PM
1

I did, multiple times. Not my problem that you don’t like the answer or that the answer stunts you. Work with what you have and give a counter, or concede. Your choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 03:24 PM
1

I’m gonna quote myself here: Once again bud, you don’t get to ask for binary answers. Not how this works. You already have your answer: A woman who birthed a baby in a bathtub has the same obligation towards that baby that she has towards any stranger in distress. And the ONLY reason the baby gets to have these rights is because it got to be born. If the fetus dies or is sick inside of her and she doesn’t seek help nothing happens. Ergo the alcohol bit you so happily ignored. 🙃
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 03:18 PM
1

Lol, no you do not. 😂 You have your answer, counter it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 03:11 PM
1

Once again bud, you don’t get to ask for binary answers. Not how this works. You already have your answer: A woman who birthed a baby in a bathtub has the same obligation towards that baby that she has towards any stranger in distress. And the ONLY reason the baby gets to have these rights is because it got to be born. If the fetus dies or is sick inside of her and she doesn’t seek help nothing happens. Ergo the alcohol bit you so happily ignored. 🙃
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 03:04 PM
1

I already answered this bud. Circle back to the answer and come back with a counter. You are not addressing any of the arguments, you’re just trying to steer the conversation your way. Not a good look.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 02:36 PM
1

So we’re obligated to care for other people or else we go to jail. Calling for an ambulance does not constitute “taking care of people”. It’s a simple action, like not crossing the street on a red light. Can you not see how this makes bodily autonomy irrelevant? We don’t actually have it, especially when it comes to children! LOL. We most definitely have it, you just don’t want to accept the obvious. You’re just trying to equate calling for an ambulance with being forced to donate bone marrow, o…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 06:41 AM
1

Yup, totally. Just as you do when you have to do your taxes (well) or else get arrested. 🙃
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 09:00 PM
1

I understand you’re saying she’s calling an ambulance for a person, that’s not an answer to my question. I’ll ask again; should she go to jail if she simply leaves the infant and does nothing for it? It’s a yes or no. You can qualify it, but say yes or no. Lol, you don’t get to ask for binary answers, bud. Not how a debate works. I already answered this question twice, how about you start working on a counter, with context? I’m actually not sure if that’s required or not for random people, but I…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 06:56 PM
1

As well as with any other stranger, the same rule applies to anyone in society. She's calling the ambulance for a person, not a fetus, as I already clarified. How do you think this is helping your point? 🙃
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 06:37 AM
1

Fair enough, though it seems to me to be a bit of cherry-picking. Let me try this a different way. What if a mother had her child in a bathtub at home? Can she simply leave the child in the bathtub without doing anything and leave it there until it dies? Assuming the fetus got out alive and became a live baby, which is a person, the same legal procedure applies as when seeing any other person in distress. You call the ambulance and wait for them to come and get the baby. Calling the ambulance fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 01:21 AM
1

Do you often make claims without backing them up? Explain the logic, don’t just say “it’s logical”. I explained it a few times already, go back and read. Thanks for conceding that they are dependent on someone else for their survival, meaning infants ARE dependent on their mothers or someone else’s body to survive. Nuance is not your strong suit, apparently. Infants ARE NOT dependent on their mothers, they are dependent on help from someone external, much like a person on life support, ventilato…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 12:35 AM
1

It’s not, I didn’t mention location anywhere in my definition. I that’s irrelevant, it’s still logical. Are infants raised by themselves or someone else? Can they survive without someone else raising them? They can be raised by people or machine. Anyone who wants to can raise them, if no one wants to then the state can intervene. However, since we are now talking about a person and not a fetus, that won’t kill them. You can’t really surrender your fetus to the state so they can finish up it’s de…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/25 06:02 PM
1

How do you conclude that from my definition? It’s just logical. If the idea is that a fetus using someone else’s body means they’re not a person, how in the hell would this not just apply to any infant? Every infant relies on their mother’s body, and I’m sure you aren’t against child neglect laws. You are required to care for them. Infants are not dependent of their mother’s or anybody else’s body to survive. They can be raised just fine without anyone there as long as they are warm, fed and cle…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/25 04:58 PM
1

The consequences of sex can be STDs, unwanted pregnancy, etc. All treatable, as it should be. Everyone has the right to receive treatment. An embryo is not a human being, neither is a fetus. If they appear (as the result of sex or not) and are unwanted, they are an unpleasant side effect and should be discarded of properly and immediately. Simple as pie. 🥧
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/25 08:21 AM
1

Most people would informally refer to a full term fetus/unborn child as a baby Most people would be wrong then. 🤷‍♀️ because developmentally it is indistinguishable from a newborn. It’s distinguishable by a newborn by the fact that it still live in utero. There's nothing about particular about birth that grants person status. That would literally mean it 'becomes' a person at that moment of birth which is absurd. If a fetus doesen’t get delivered on time, it dies. It does not become a person. It…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/25 07:38 AM
1

I would define a person simply as an individual human being. Then a human being is also defined by their ability to live outside of the uterus. Anyways, so is your argument predicated on someone using someone else’s body is the argument for why they’re a person, Yes meaning they’re not able to function on their own? A bit more nuanced than that. If the need is for a machine, then that’s fine, it’s a person. If the need is for living inside a person’s body, then it’s not a person. Or are people n…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/25 07:13 AM
1

Killing a baby shortly before it's born, for no other reason than being unwanted, Killing a fetus. Babies have to be born, by definition. As I said before, if the fetus is developed enough and it won’t hurt the mother, it can get a forced birth. is grotesque What is grotesque is forcing a fully developed human being to grow another potential human being inside of them when they don’t want to do it anymore, or never did. and probably a majority of doctors would not want to be involved. They signe…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/25 07:00 AM
2

Why don’t you define what a person is, you’re the one who brought up the term with such impunity a few comments ago. 😂😂😂 Whatever, sure. A person is an human individual who can live outside of the body of another human being. As long as you can not keep your body alive without it being inside someone else’s body, you are not a person. Because you’re just fundamentally incapable of living.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/25 01:08 AM
2

Thank you for pointing out the flaws in the argument, because if the only distinction here is inconvenience to the mother who has to carry and birth the child, No flaw in my argument. if the fetus gets to that point and the mom wants it out, then they can get it a forced birth and it can get a stab at being a person, as long as the forced birth is not hurting the mother. If the fetus puts the mother’s life in danger, then if should get evacuated by any means necessary, no matter the consequences…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/25 12:49 AM
2

I’m asking you WHY. Why does being inside of the uterus not make you a person? Because you cannot keep your body alive outside of another human being. If you get to the point where you can breathe on your own, ~7mo, then you can get a forced birth in lieu of an abortion and get to give it a try. If a baby is 20 minutes from being born, are they not a person? Nope, not a person yet.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/25 12:34 AM
2

So the exact point a fetus crosses over in to being a baby is at birth and right up to that point it has no rights. A fetus should have their lungs well developed enough to be able to live outside the uterus at the 6.5-7 mo mark. Even then, as long as it’s in utero I would not call it a person yet. You still need a succesul birth for that to happen. 10 minutes before it's born it still has no rights. Literally yes, legally, morally, you name it. The law in countries where abortion on demand is l…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/25 12:17 AM
0

You can absolutely not be a person and live inside the uterus, bud. What are you talking about? What proof do you need? 😂😂😂 This is ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 10:53 PM
1

By your logic, embryos are also people, and most of those naturally end up on a sanitary napkin without the woman ever knowing that it formed. The logic is very straightforward and valid. A fetus is a fetus and a baby is a baby. A child can be a baby. A child can not be a fetus because that one isn't capable of living outside the uterus. The stages of life you are referring to begin after birth. Not rocket science.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 10:16 PM
1

Women had abortions since the beginning of time, bud. It has nothing to do with technology. And it's healthcare, not murder or any of the ritualistic garbage your sick mind thinks of.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 09:38 PM
3

men have been told to do this And have they been listening? I'd say the issue is that most men are not listening to this advice and are just stuck in an impotent rage. Maybe if we completely socially isolated all warmongers we'd be in a much better spot as a society.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 04:36 PM
6

A child is a child and a fetus is a fetus. Abortion is not the same as infanticide, stop trying to equate them.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 04:32 PM
3

It’s social conditioning. Plenty of women care about it, they’re just not being taken seriously because current social norms dictate that for men promiscuity equates to masculinity, competency, machismo. It’s also mind boggling in terms of compatibility, you’d think that promiscuous people should be aware of themselves and go for a more promiscuous partner, and viceversa. Makes no sense for a thrice divorced ran through individual to go for a more ingenue one.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 05:36 PM
10

You do realize this applies to both men and women, right? I mean, if you’re the kind of guy who only sleeps with serious relationship partners and keeps himself as pure as possible, then sure, you can ask the same from a potential partner. If you’re “ran through” then walk you own lane. This goes both ways. Fair is fair, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 04:04 PM
0

How is that relevant, though? Her insight is very good and she gave a step-by-step guide on how to avoid the situation presented in this post. How is it relevant which group gets rejected the most? And why would you try to invalidate her input when she’s been nothing but gracious?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 08:50 PM
11

Sperm quality is a big relationship concern for any woman who wants kids, regardless of age.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 05:37 PM
5

The vast majority of humanity derives meaning from their family. Usually their own family which means partner and kids. The majority, yes. The chunk that prefers celibacy is definitely the minority, although we did see some increase in the last few years. It's not really relevant, though. We have had an explosion of drug use, depression and anxiety int he past 20 years. When we ask people why they feel like shit we get the same answer most of the time. Their life lacks a meaning. Source? This is…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 03:49 PM
5

LOL. Your bias and vitriol are showing. 🙃 Why is it so hard for you to accept that a decent chunk of the general population just fare better single? I see here that a few peeps stated their case quite compellingly. You had the same subpar reaction for each one. And what are the social consequences that you propose singles should suffer, exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 03:20 PM
11

It seems you're assuming that everyone wants the same thing as you and that everyone thrives in the same conditions as you, which is not correct. Having a family and kids can be the best thing in the world for some and a nightmare for others. No one should make that kind of decision because of societal pressure. There are a lot of people out there who are horrible partners and parents because the role just doesn't suit them. Why would we want to proliferate that? I know there are a lot of people…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 01:51 PM
11

Still, it is a useless generalization. Whosoever is wired to procreate will do so, and whosoever is not wired to procreate will not, same goes with relationships. In fact, many are choosing to only have the kid(s) and not the marriage or relationship at all. As long as they're prepared to shoulder that responsibility by themselves, what's wrong with that? All choices come with some measure of happiness and misery. There's no perfect one. We should all enjoy the same social grace, though. Calling…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 12:45 PM
13

I think some would really like cat ladies to be as miserable as they're imagining them to be just so they can confirm their own bias. It's not always the case, if ever. Some people are just happier, or happiest, with only pets, short term and long term. Others prefer having a family or being single w/o pets. I don't see anything wrong with any of that. You can recommend what makes you happy, I can recommend what makes me happy, and so on. At the end of the day, we each have to choose for ourselv…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 12:22 PM
14

More often than not, not staying in bad relationships involves being single. Nothing wrong with that, just more peace and spare time to do your own thing. I keep seeing the "miserable cat woman" trope, what is so wrong with being one, exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 11:56 AM
0

LOL
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 08:59 AM
1

Marital rape in South Asia is most definitely not "super rare", it's just seldomley reported. It's usually not reported because women are not really seen as full human beings there, especially in India and Pakistan, where misogyny is part of the culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 08:41 AM
6

Depends, are South Asian women apt in forced pegging and practicing it as often as men rape?Because that's about the only thing that would make it "balanced".
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/25 11:41 PM
2

Well, that’s doable even as a single mom. How are you planning to account for the women’s support network outside of romantic relationships with men? Most have families, a lot of them are even very tight knit and very willing to invest in the future of their women members. Most receive an inheritance or two during their lifetime, receive significant help from their families during big moments in life, like the birth of a child. Your hypothesis seems to be very grounded in the fact that women liv…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 11:45 PM
2

I’m really curious, what do you think constitutes an “acceptable lifestyle” from a woman’s perspective?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 09:19 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter