~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | These are MIT's gender statistics for undergraduate applications and it's pretty obvious what the problem is. The source in the comments. (It gets worse towards the end).wha? | /r/MensRights | 04/04/21 04:43 PM |
| 1 | These are MIT's gender statistics for undergraduate applications and it's pretty obvious what the problem is. The source in the comments. (It gets worse towards the end).Well you do bring up some points worth investigating, though there are some things we disagree with here. I would not compare slavery and genocide to the division of labour between men and women. If it was truly the case that men were seeking to deny power from women as you claim, then it would have been impossible for then to acquire their equal rights in the first place, since men controlled all the power at the time. The suffragettes were still a significant minority of women at the time of p… | /r/MensRights | 04/04/21 04:36 PM |
| 3 | These are MIT's gender statistics for undergraduate applications and it's pretty obvious what the problem is. The source in the comments. (It gets worse towards the end).Just say you don't like the guy, you don't have to pretend like him having a specialization in a specific field of psychology means he has no understanding of any other components of psychology. I can tell you don't like him because anytime anyone speaks out against someone who isn't radically left, they call them conservative pundits after watching one 3 minute clip out of context on some YouTube video. Most of the things he says does allign with professional organizations, a confused senator t… | /r/MensRights | 04/04/21 06:04 AM |
| 2 | These are MIT's gender statistics for undergraduate applications and it's pretty obvious what the problem is. The source in the comments. (It gets worse towards the end).What part of what I wrote made you think it was an informational analysis? Do you think I just sat around one day and came up with these random figures? The information I've gotten is from Jordan Peterson's talks about the differences between men and women - everything that I've referenced is taken from there. His stance is backed by studies conducted in Nordic countries on the very same topic, well regarded as the most progressive countries in the world. I don't know about you, but I think a wo… | /r/MensRights | 04/04/21 12:45 AM |
| 8 | These are MIT's gender statistics for undergraduate applications and it's pretty obvious what the problem is. The source in the comments. (It gets worse towards the end).It's actually a good question - the answer being the following: On average, men and women are generally similar, though some traits lean more heavily on one end. One of the biggest differences found between men and women is the interest in "things" vs the interest in people. Men are generally more interested in things than they are in people, and vice-versa for women. The distribution itself isn't incredibly significant, but it becomes significantly more pronounced at the extremes (i.e. top 1% i… | /r/MensRights | 03/04/21 05:14 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter