TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

suprachromat Archive

View 0 posts and 20 comments by suprachromat on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
38

Yep, pretty insane he was still accused and found guilty. Even though he used affirmative consent by asking her if she liked what he was doing, as is claimed all college age men are supposed to do, and she gave her consent... she outright ADMITTED to the university that she consented! And yet he was found guilty of non-consensual touching by the university. How was it non-consensual if she gave consent? How is that remotely logical? I mean, I realize I shouldn't be surprised, but this is still s…
/r/MensRights20/10/15 09:20 PM
14

Felony assault, no less. Felony = gg for employment and education prospects. Consequences.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 10:06 PM
12

A beating and a headlock, wrekt. He's 6'6" and a bouncer. That guy had no idea wtf he was getting himself into.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 09:33 PM
1

Personally I also liked the part where he put one of the girl's friends (or a whiteknighter) into a headlock after he got attacked for bitchslapping her.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 09:31 PM
1

Nope, it applies to the entire site. All your comments become invisible to everyone else, usually permanently, requiring you to make a new account.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 06:39 PM
3

Just Google it, I did... tl;dr certain Reddit mods/admins have the power to mark your account as a spam account. After that, none of your comments show up to anyone else. You apparently don't get any notification, though, and you can still login/use your account.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 11:50 PM
7

Slavery. It was traditional. Why did we stop? /s
/r/MensRights05/09/14 06:46 PM
12

Instead of condemning those who would steal the private photographs and publish them online for all to see, we condemn or belittle the women who chose to create said private photographs in the first place. So, uh, we can't do both at the same time? Moving on, this is just a rehash of the trusty feminist argument that places all blame on the (usually) male perp for rape, in essence "don't ever blame the [female] victim." Or, translated from feminist speak, "don't ever assign any responsibility to…
/r/MensRights02/09/14 01:22 AM
4

This is just casual sexism that reveals more about the author of the article than it does about the actual reality.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 09:35 PM
6

This is a great little tidbit from the article: She [Beyonce] also flashed up Nigerian author Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie's sensible definition of feminism: someone "who believes in the social, political and economic equality of the sexes". I guess we're all feminists here, ey? Hm. Problem is, in reality, that's not actually what feminism is trying to accomplish these days... it's leaning a lot more towards inequality instead. More privilege for women at the expense of men. Of course, shhh, I'm not…
/r/MensRights30/08/14 12:39 AM
2

Good article. The crux of the problem being that there's nothing to stop the woman from simply lying later and claiming she didn't give affirmative consent. Then it's the usual he says vs. she says, and mostly the woman is believed unless there's overwhelming evidence she's lying. The law is too vague and it doesn't fix anything.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 11:46 PM
12

Because feminism is now considered to be a politically correct movement, and therefore any group that criticizes it must be misogynist and discriminatory by definition. Can't have that on the front page of the internet, can we? /s
/r/MensRights29/08/14 11:37 PM
5

Although it's good to see that for once a rape accusation wasn't rubber stamped as truth, I think it's only because she was stupid about it. Changing her story several times and trying to delete text messages that clearly proved she was lying isn't very smart. I doubt that she would be convicted right now if she had kept her story straight and hadn't exchanged those texts.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 11:22 PM
0

Right, but turn it around: what if it was "how to get a girlfriend" on the sign? Tumblr would be up in arms, screaming about how it encourages violence towards women, that it shows the patriarchy at work, etc. etc. etc. Yet it's acceptable and hilarious if it's a violent joke directed against men. Classic example of feminist double standards. So much for equality.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 08:37 PM
1

I think there's some solid momentum building against the SJW push into the gaming sphere. So if the mainstream gaming websites continue to push SJW viewpoints on their gaming audience, and an alternative site exists, it could become very popular. Not quite sure it's at the critical mass stage, though, so it might be premature. Your call. I'll definitely check it out if/when it launches!
/r/MensRights29/08/14 09:33 AM
5

You're right, apparently I read into it too much. Their comments seemed to indicate any participation by an /r/MensRights member in known SJW subreddits would get them banned because of being an /r/MensRights member, regardless of the nature of the participation (seemed pretty unfair to me.) But your explanation of why shadowbanning is used makes much more sense. Thanks for clearing that up for me.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 08:01 AM
28

It's relevant because you are male, if you were a female it wouldn't be relevant. ;) Seriously though, this is just a prime example of how trying to talk with many feminists and SJWs using facts and logic doesn't work. They just talk past you, outright ignore you, or in this case, whack you with a banhammer (I hope you don't get shadowbanned too.. apparently a real possibility..) On the flip side, it's also good because it illustrates why we as men need to fight this NOW, while we can still infl…
/r/MensRights29/08/14 01:31 AM
38

Wow, I didn't even know shadowbanning was a thing until I read these two comments and searched for the term (yeap I'm a newb.) That's a pretty unfair way of silencing dissent from the SJW party line, but somehow I'm not too surprised. Thank you based nicemod & Methodius.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 01:25 AM
2

I'm at the point where I dislike visiting my favorite gaming news websites (Kotaku, Polygon, RPS ... etc.) because of the SJW posts that are increasingly common. I want to read about the latest gaming news, and discuss games, but I don't want to give these places the ad and click revenue from my visits when they are publishing SJW pieces. The whole Zoe Quinn drama and how it was covered really got me pissed off, now the latest SJW drivel is the Anita Sarkeesian stuff. Piss off! I'd abandon these…
/r/MensRights28/08/14 11:19 PM
19

I love how she advances logical arguments as to why marriage is bad for men, and they totally ignore them in favor of appeals to emotion or irrelevant arguments. Best part: Q: "Why hasn't a man written this book?" A: "Because men can't speak up . . . because people will actually listen to a woman." Damn straight. If a man had written the book, he'd be immediately, mercilessly attacked by SJWs and feminists as a misogynist loser with commitment problems.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 07:50 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter