TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

surfnsound Archive

View 1 posts and 301 comments by surfnsound on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

surfnsound/r/MensRights07/04/12 02:05 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
23

They also conveniently chose to analyze a 3 year period in which the men's team didn't play in a world cup. The only time it had happened in 32 years.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 04:03 PM
7

How the fuck is this a Men's Rights Issue? Can we please fucking stop it?
/r/MensRights29/07/18 12:40 AM
48

Maybe instead not treat all boys like mindless sex fiends. Dress codes are about professionalism and social acceptability, not sex.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 04:09 PM
10

Don't mention that part. Just put it in a glittery box with this picture on the front.
/r/MensRights10/12/17 07:54 PM
20

apparently we now have to import sperm from elsewhere. BRB, setting up Bangladeshi sperm factory.
/r/MensRights10/12/17 07:18 PM
1

Additionally, the Violence Against Women Act is, despite the name, written in a gender neutral fashion. An unfortunate name devised for political purposes.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 01:42 AM
1

Because what kind of job are you going to get after 15 years of being unemployed? Meanwhile if you start now, when the alimony stops you may have worked your way into a decent paying position.
/r/MensRights30/10/16 02:10 AM
1

Nah.,, because in NJ it eventually runs out. So in my example in 5 years you get nothing. So if you alread have bad jobs prospects after 10 years, 15 isn't going to make them any better. If you want to have any chance of standing on your own when the state pulls the plug, you better start looking to make it in your own sooner rather than later.
/r/MensRights30/10/16 02:05 AM
4

Exactly. I'm not saying it's common, which is why the alimony exists in the first place.
/r/MensRights29/10/16 05:32 PM
16

I think in NJ it's half the time they were married, and I think it is means adjusted as well. Which seems ffair to me. Say you're married 10 years and she stayed at home with the kids. You get divorced. College is 4 years alone right there if she never went, plus a year to get settled in her new career. Now if she goes out right away and gets a job making 60k a year, then, yes, that should be factored in.
/r/MensRights29/10/16 05:15 PM
2

To be fair, they've made way more than 30 by this point.
/r/MensRights08/07/16 02:04 PM
15

But the second Chad, the cabling tech, asks her if she uses no-lye relaxer she will haul his ass to HR.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 09:36 PM
6

Yeah, but not many people run to the police because they consensually had sex
/r/MensRights05/12/15 04:00 AM
9

annnnd I'm dead
/r/MensRights05/10/15 05:55 PM
6

I'm 100% sure that's a lie. At 15 all we think about is sex, so if a hot teacher wants the D of course we're going to give it. Yeah, you're really not helping. . .
/r/MensRights29/09/15 08:16 PM
7

It's definitely bad because the kid says he was scarred by it. Do I think there are scenarios when maybe we should let it slide? Sure. To some extent I do think it is up to the victim in the case to decide what they want to happen. In this came it seems like a harsh punishment would have been justified.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 07:06 PM
20

I was thinking the same thing, if you don't know the proper way to receive a diploma and shake hands after graduating from Columbia, you probably didn't deserve to graduate from Columbia. Shit, I literally learned that in Kindergarten
/r/MensRights21/05/15 07:07 PM
62

Please have a seat in the oppression dungeon, the doctor will be with you shortly.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 05:26 PM
1

I totally agree, I just don't like the "brain not entirely developed" argument because all of the supporting research raises the same question I asked about when is the brain formed enough. Age of consent is a tricky issue because it is something that really should be decided on a case by case basis, but because of the way the law works that would be nearly impossible to implement. Then you get the crowd who will say "A __ year old can't give consent, period." But they fail to realize the circul…
/r/MensRights29/04/15 12:44 PM
2

The problem is those same studies show the brain isn't fully developed until the early 20s, I've seen some say 25. Should we delay consent until then? Is every act of college campus sex now rape?
/r/MensRights29/04/15 10:39 AM
3

Needs more monocle
/r/MensRights17/04/15 05:11 PM
8

The only bright spot in this situation for now is that no respectable company will ever hire Emma Sulkowicz Well, to be fair, her senior project was a piece of performance art carrying around a mattress. There was little chance of this happening anyway.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 06:25 PM
1

This explains why libertarianism is always described as inherently misogynistic.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 01:24 PM
4

In case we need a recent example: Burlington County Mother Shot 3 Kids, Killing 2, Before Turning Gun on Herself: Police The third one died later.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 08:03 PM
95

Woman: She must be flooded with hormones which can cloud her judgment. Everyone: Oh, we should have empathy Man: She must be flooded with hormones which can cloud her judgment Everyone: How fucking dare you, scum bag.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 03:18 PM
6

The spanish inquisition.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 02:22 PM
18

You don't understand, they're socialized into accepting lower wage jobs. You can't expect women to have their own opinions on things or stand up for themselves.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 08:06 PM
1

If he remembered the damn free space hew oudl have had a bingo.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 03:34 PM
5

(5) She's also Ron Burgundy?
/r/MensRights21/11/14 08:21 PM
-1

... except it was on take Dad to school night
/r/MensRights01/10/14 01:45 PM
-5

I agree there is nothing wrong with the goal, but they did fall short on the message. The advice is sound, but they should have left the focus on how having an involved father is beneficial to the child. Don't bring the marriage into it.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 12:48 PM
1

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2h7kzh/and_now_the_witch_hunts_commence_anonymous_lists/ckq8lbj
/r/MensRights23/09/14 05:02 PM
8

How do you make it so only people they know, and a sufficient number of them, are there? You don't, you put everyone, which is exactly the point. Like literally the entire male student body of the school plus the administration appears somewhere one one of these posters.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 04:42 PM
8

What is to stop people taking the new posters seriously? Because every male they know will be on one of the lists. So unless they are one of the crazies who believe there is no such thing as a decent man out there, they will be forced to take the lists with a grain of salt.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 03:28 PM
0

It's pretty bad ass to have the balls to say it.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 12:46 PM
1

I think that number is for all forms of child abuse, not specifically sexual abuse of a child.
/r/MensRights07/09/14 01:57 PM
16

between 5 and 20 percent so even by this study, 80-95% of child sex abusers are men. Let's not hail this a a shining example of hypocrisy and yell "See, women do it too!" Instead let's focus on what happens after. Let's examine how male victims of female abusers are treated. Let's see how female abusers are punished. But for god's sake, let's not pretend like 5-20% of the population of child sex abusers being female is some great victory.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 08:18 PM
2

"In Bergen County, men who aren't able to convince a judge they have done their best to pay what they owe are ordered to spend nights and weekends in the special wing of the jail. They are strip-searched, subjected to random urine tests and sent out each weekday morning to work - or look for work - to pay their debt and earn their release. Women are sent home in ankle bracelets, escaping jail only because there is no similar wing for them. "
/r/MensRights28/07/14 07:28 PM
17

Look at how he was dressed.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 10:49 AM
8

This one little thing But it's not one little thing, it's a whole mess of little things that is morphing into one huge thing for their son.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 05:18 PM
8

I hope they have a son
/r/MensRights22/06/14 01:14 PM
1

I don't know, I just don't see anything wrong with the example you posted. It's clearly targeted at people who are having sex, and isn't implying anything about people who are not.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 01:15 AM
3

While I agree virgin shaming is problematic, I really disagree with the idea that we should stop promoting safe sex because it makes reluctant virgins feel bad is a good idea.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 11:44 PM
1

That's..... exactly what I said?
/r/MensRights20/05/14 04:06 PM
1

No, the courts don't work that way. A decision in a district court is only binding in that district and any lower courts under that district. Other districts can (and often have) issue conflicting rulings, in which case the case can be appealed to the next level of courts, until it gets to the U.S Supreme court, which is obviously binding everywhere.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 02:16 PM
1

Well, it's non-binding precedent in any place other than Eastern Pennsylvania, but it gives you a good guideline of how to construct your argument. edit: Also, note that this only is allowing the case on some of the counts to move forward. It in no way passes any judgment or offers any opinion on if the case has enough merit to win, only that it is a legally permissible suit.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 12:32 PM
2

Because you are blinded by your privilege, obvs.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 12:53 PM
6

of course they are going to want to know who the parties are that are involved. It's called standard fucking procedure. But the man wasn't involved. I had to put myself between two fucking gorilla sized black people (male and female) when I walked in on the man body slamming the woman to the ground all because of a cell phone. I don't even get pepper spray or a gun in my career and if that monkey would have chimped out on me I would have had absolutely no qualms with doing whatever I could to pu…
/r/MensRights26/02/14 06:05 PM
5

/u/callthebankshot is referring to the idea that sex is something the man always does to the woman. In this point of view, the woman cannot initiate sex (even during consensual sex) therefore cannot rape. SO if you come from this point of view, even if they are both intoxicated, the woman still has less culpability because she never initiates sex.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 03:43 AM
1

It's chicken or the egg though. It could be more women abuse children because they have custody more often.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 08:57 PM
14

And the jury is to decide who they believe, who they trust. No, the jury is to decide if the state has proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt. There is no room for feelz in a jury.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 04:28 PM
9

"Men are proactive by... acting to prevent potentially dangerous situations." But tell that to a woman and you're victim blaming.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 02:09 PM
1

Because she was in a multiple ton SUV hitting two kids hidden in a pile of leaves who combined may have broken triple digits.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 07:39 PM
2

From this article: During her trial, Garcia-Cisneros testified she drove through a leaf pile on Main Street in Forest Grove and heard a bump, but thought she hit a rock. She learned two children were injured in the crash a few minutes later, according to investigators. So a few minutes later she learned of it. Pretty sure she had already driven off by then. /u/Angrycyc covered this as well: The accident wasn't far from her house, so the "few minutes later" was when she was already at home and he…
/r/MensRights01/02/14 07:36 PM
-3

she knew she hit them and drove off No she didn't.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 03:18 PM
2

If you didn't want a kid and you got pregnant you missed several opportunities to prevent that. you could have not had sex in the first place. Since everyone is human and sex is awesome this isn't always the #1 choice, nor does it have to be. Condoms. They are incredibly effective, and should be used regardless if you are having sex with a partner outside of a monogamous relationship. *Tubal ligation. If you really are sure you don't want kids ever, just get your tubes ties. You cannot possibly …
/r/MensRights26/01/14 05:46 AM
3

While people often say right to work means you can be fired for any reason, you in reality can't be fired for any reason, and sex/gender would be one of those reasons. If the owner really did fire all male employees, and keep all female employees, and there number of male employees was not non-trivial, it would be pretty easy to say this was systemic discrimination.
/r/MensRights27/12/13 08:28 PM
0

Less than the number that use the poorly structured 77 cents to the dollar statistic
/r/MensRights19/12/13 07:45 PM
-1

Until you catch the early flight home from San Diego and a couple of nude people jump out of your bathroom blindfolded like a goddamn magic show ready to double team your girlfriend...
/r/MensRights18/12/13 04:22 AM
0

Unless you directly observe the rape, they're only 50% raped?
/r/MensRights17/12/13 05:30 PM
2

Obviously as long as "it's out of anger" it's ok
/r/MensRights14/12/13 12:22 PM
14

I think it was Mike Tyson who said "I'm going to smile til you love me faggot"
/r/MensRights09/12/13 06:53 PM
1

I think the only thing that really annoys me is that I see some people in there wearing pyjamas. I'm not sure why it annoys me so much, maybe something about decorum. I used to have something similar in a LA Fitness that was near a not so nice part of town. These guys would be in there in boots, jeans and a wifebeater, hogging all the weight benches so they could just do bench press and bicep curls and nothing else while bullshitting in between sets. They obviously didn't care about fitness.
/r/MensRights22/11/13 09:10 PM
19

I don't think it's the entire gym. It says "Fitness Suite" and it is on a schedule of fitness classes. I'm guessing it is only one room of the gym where the classes are held that isn't co-ed for that one hour. Also, "Fitness Suite" could be the name of a specific class.
/r/MensRights22/11/13 04:10 PM
1

It would also compel the spouse of an accused person to testify against the accused in court. What? Nope. Thanks god this is Canada
/r/MensRights21/11/13 06:40 PM
2

I think his point is, he isn't capable of ever needing BC. Obviously he is capable of needing surgery one day.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 08:41 PM
0

This was my reaction at first, however, I now look at it this way. No, this is not specifically a "men's rights" issue, but it is a human rights issue. Treating individuals with a common sense of decency and respect is always a good thing, and acknowledging this need in all its forms, and calling out the individual bad actors when they violate the rights of another person, no matter their motivation, would go a long way towards accomplishing the goals of the men's rights movement. In doing so, w…
/r/MensRights05/11/13 06:13 PM
9

Are you, sir, implying /u/mjcov doesn't last 30 seconds?
/r/MensRights16/10/13 07:15 PM
2

I think that's definitely preferable. I suppose then you just continue the anonymity for both parties in the event of an acquittal?
/r/MensRights17/09/13 04:38 PM
3

While it's unfair to her to not label her a victim, doing so contributes to an assumption that the acquitted is still a rapist. There will still be plenty of opportunities for her to receive support as a victim without the media labeling her as one, where as the continued assumption of the guy as a rapist despite the acquittal such a public label would cause is a huge burden for the accused.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 04:15 PM
4

Until they are found guilty, the accused is an "alleged rapist," ergo the accuser is an "alleged victim." Now, there can be a case where the accuser is a victim, just not the victim of the person they accused. To clarify, there can be evidence a rape occurred, but also evidence that the accused person didn't do it. But really how often does that happen? So it's probably better to just used "alleged" until the case is decided for both parties.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 03:36 PM
8

It's just the patriarchy manifesting itself as the male gaze.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 09:46 PM
1

The bigger issue is in 37 states, you could be days below age of consent in your state, lie about your age to your partner, and they would be the one guilty of a crime, not you for defrauding them.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 02:47 AM
3

Didn't you know? You're not allowed to get upset when someone calls your entire gender stupid because there is no systemic discrimination against men, it's just lots of individual discriminations piled on top of each other.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 07:41 PM
5

From the sounds of it, the mom didn't sound like a winner, even if "worthless piece of shit" is a bit harsh. The only reason the state came after him for money was because she decided to try to live off the state (at least according to the author).
/r/MensRights21/04/12 02:52 PM
2

Whoops, you're right.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 06:27 PM
-5

Just FYI, it's complementary. I don't think Malcolm X and MLK were telling each other how nice they looked in a suit. A device I use: complementary angles complete a straight line.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 06:01 PM
7

Maybe we should light ourselves on fire
/r/MensRights16/04/12 05:39 PM
11

How about we actually ask the kid to see if he might like an accurate family medical history?
/r/MensRights15/04/12 03:55 AM
7

No, no. It's ok to joke about something that never ever happens. /s
/r/MensRights08/04/12 04:54 AM
2

However, if you are not found guilty you are innocent. Not correct. The determination of a court is not "innocent or guilty", it's "guilty or not guilty". This is because the burden is on the state to prove beyond a resonable doubt that you are guilty. Just because they can't do this, doesn't mean you're innocent, it just means that can't prove you aren't. SO the court is saying we have to treat you as if you're innocent, even though you may not be.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 02:24 PM
7

Highlight of the article for me: In interviewing 10th graders for my book on teenage sexuality in the United States and the Netherlands, I found that American boys often said sex could end their life as they knew it. After a condom broke, one worried: “I could be screwed for the rest of my life.” Another boy said he did not want to have sex yet for fear of becoming a father before his time.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 02:06 PM
5

Look both ways next time ya dumb bitch! Sixth Ave. is one way.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 10:55 AM
11

Looking the wrong way down a one way street before crossing is pretty ditzy.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 10:53 AM
7

I don't know about Canada, but in the US most life insurance policies don't pay out on suicide.
/r/MensRights24/03/12 02:20 PM
6

I love the Marcotte quote about that incident. Man set himself on fire.... his ex-wife is the real victim.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 02:10 PM
30

From the comments: i'm actually surprised to hear that men don't welcome the "innuendo" that they're popular with the young ladies. i honestly think it's more likely that they don't trust themself or can't focus on anything but their sexual chances when they're alone with a woman- and heaven forbid she's actually smart AND pretty WTF???
/r/MensRights21/02/12 07:36 PM
4

I didn't downvote you, but let me try to explain. You're right in that prima facie this would not be a men's right issue. However, the fact is that someone will look at a complaint that there are so few women in C-Level exec positions, and decide that the only possible explanation is discrimination. To that person, it isn't conceivable that the choices people make might be significantly different along gender lines and that those choices could contribute at least somewhat to said statistic they …
/r/MensRights13/02/12 11:42 PM
10

OK, fine, to not be arbitrary let's compare the number of military deaths over the same 10 year period the suicides were counted in. Sure, if we count WWII the military deaths would be way higher. But at the same time, you can't appreciate the fact that you're comparing suicides in 10 years to military deaths in 65 years and those in the 10 year period are greater?
/r/MensRights09/02/12 02:29 AM
17

1) Claim women are paid less than men. 2) Strong arm legislation recitfying the situation. 3) Profit 4) Bitch you now can't find a man who earns more than you.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 07:59 PM
1

The sort of suspicion and defamation that are cast upon any accused is seen as being bad enough for it to be inadmissible in later trials (ie the accused, if found guilty, cannot be drawn into suspicion into the future as it is assum that the first ruling was correct and there is no reason to have any more suspicion than of any other accused). Except in cases of sexual assault that isn't true. Federal Rules of Evidence 413 allows for prior accusations, even if they never resulted in trial or wen…
/r/MensRights03/02/12 11:52 AM
10

She said academic years, not academic hours. So unless she got into Harvard not understanding misplaced modifiers, she simply meant 57 hours total. This is bolstered by the fact that she calls it "training" instead of "studies". Even if she did mean academic hours, I find it unlikely she had 57 of them directly applicable to the situation of false rape claims. Furthermore, the fact that you resort to petty name calling might explain why you are a 34 year old college junior. I had 3 degrees under…
/r/MensRights03/02/12 04:44 AM
2

I wouldn't mind false filing being investigated more often, however I think one needs to take care not to swing the pendulum too far in the other direction. As others have mentioned here, often times when an allegation is made that does not end up resulting in charges against the accused it probably is true that the accuser felt wronged in some way, and possibly in a very corporeal way that to them exceeds mere regret, but falls short of criminality. Successful rape convictions are very rare, mu…
/r/MensRights03/02/12 12:51 AM
25

My comment mentioning anonymity for the accused which I think was overlooked by many: "Coming forward and being branded a liar must be even more difficult, and is incredibly unfair to someone who is seeking justice and trying to do what is right after being horribly victimized. " What about being falsely branded as a sex offender and then having that accusation live on in perpetuity even after those accusation never come to any sort of resolution that shows them to be the truth? I'm not one to c…
/r/MensRights02/02/12 08:58 PM
40

I have spent fifty-seven hours of the past three academic years in training about issues of sexual assault, abuse, dating, and other relationship issues I wish I could spend 19 hours a year on something and be considered some sort of expert on the subject.
/r/MensRights02/02/12 08:43 PM
29

lyk dis if u cry evrytime
/r/MensRights02/02/12 03:34 AM
2

The problem you're running into is there are many who want to apply an "enthusiastic consent" standard to criminal rape. As you've said, having sex with someone who is merely willing may make your skin crawl, it's not criminal. The way the law stands, if she says, "Fine, let's get this over with," it's not rape. People exist who want to change that. Anything other than "Yes! Yes! Parkman, you stud!" (Sorry, coudln't find the right clip) would be considered criminal.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 07:42 PM
-1

Yo may have just answered your own question.
/r/MensRights22/01/12 11:29 PM
8

I think it's important to point out that this wasn't a sentence handed down after a conviction by a jury, it was part of a plea deal that was approved by the victim and his family. Courts often give much deference to the wishes of the victim in these cases.
/r/MensRights22/01/12 02:10 AM
1

He has not been fired yet, he is only on suspension. Not that it makes it any better. It's a shame really because he really is one of the better weathermen I have come across as far as accuracy goes. Is he a bit of a Lothario? No question. But he is also gregarious and has a great sense of humor, and I know a lot of people in the Philadelphia area loved him. Even after his suspension he is a regular on the Preston and Steve show, the highest rated morning radio show in the area.
/r/MensRights14/01/12 10:04 PM
1

The problem is they still fail to place the burden of preventing rape on the person actually commiting the act. People who create these type of ads are fed of with victim blaming, and see low conviction rates in sexual assault cases as a failure of the criminal justice system, and feel the need to place this burden on someone. But if you can't blame the victim, and you can't trust the law to do its job, the only people left are the third parties.
/r/MensRights14/01/12 09:54 PM
3

How many times does this need to be downvoted into oblivion before you stop posting it?
/r/MensRights14/01/12 09:41 PM
4

It's where canola oil comes from.
/r/MensRights09/01/12 12:50 PM
2

But they base that one a definition that only they use. Misandry and misogyny are simply defined as hatred of one gender. Sexism if prejudice against one gender. The definition of each does not involve systemic oppression or discrimination, except when it becomes expedient by the group currently trying to play the victim card to define it as such, thereby negating any countervailing claims of sexism by their "opponents" since according to the definition they choose to use, sexism cannot exist ag…
/r/MensRights19/12/11 09:48 PM
55

crying about cis-gendered heteronormative white males FTFY. We don't want to get r/SRS in an uproar.
/r/MensRights14/12/11 08:32 PM
21

I have a list of women withholding sex Is it called the phone book?
/r/MensRights08/12/11 01:51 AM
4

It's not available in all countries yet.
/r/MensRights30/11/11 04:03 PM
4

There used to be, but the legislatures decided to not let judges actually use their own judgment, so the good ones all left.
/r/MensRights30/11/11 12:51 AM
12

Where do you get off? Those men are making $2.74 a day, and living high on the hog!
/r/MensRights29/11/11 04:29 PM
3

It depends on the locality for a representative.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 03:48 AM
9

1.) While she seems to have some trouble moving and speaking, I'm not sure this is indicative of reduced cognitivie or analytic abilities rather than just ataxia and imapired speech, which would be expected from a sever frontal lobe injury as it contains the primary motor cortex. 2.) It never says so in the article from what I saw, but are you implying that the reason she manages to still hold office even if it turned out she did have diminshed faculties is because she's a woman? Otherwise I see…
/r/MensRights15/11/11 09:41 PM
1

No shave upstairs, shave downstairs November maybe?
/r/MensRights02/11/11 07:03 PM
8

If you think InfinitelyThirsting is a misandrist troll, you obviously don't spend much time here. One of the all time highest voted posts in this entire subreddit was a link to a comment of hers posted in a female targeted subreddit in regard to Men's Rights.
/r/MensRights02/11/11 06:25 PM
7

I would agree with you if there were an equal number of DV awareness campaigns directed towards female perpetrated domestic violence.
/r/MensRights23/10/11 06:31 PM
9

You must have missed the memo that Aerik doesn't believe women can be sexist.
/r/MensRights22/10/11 06:51 PM
1

Just counter with this picture
/r/MensRights21/10/11 04:24 PM
1

In the US, it is expcted inmates do some sort of work in the prison unless they are somehow considered a danger to fellow inmates or guards. Maybe it's not the same in Italy, but here at least she wouldn't be just sitting on her ass.
/r/MensRights20/10/11 08:38 PM
2

I don't think one "positive" State Farm commercial makes up for the other dozen or so in the past 6 months that portray men as idiots.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 10:36 PM
19

"We don't have the resources to offer it to males inmates." What, do the ankle bracelets only come in women's sizes?
/r/MensRights25/09/11 04:16 PM
9

It's not a particularly rare viewpoint either. Let's take words out of it and apply actions absed on the words. A woman is walking down the street alone at night, sees a single man walking on the sidewalk towards her. For her safety, she crosses to the other side of the street. A white man is walking down the street alone at night and sees a black man walking on the sidewalk towrds him. For his safety he crosses to the other side of the street. Many people would say the first instance is "being …
/r/MensRights20/09/11 04:11 PM
18

"Only men can stop rape" I applaud those who say "only rapists can stop rape" unfortunately a quick google search for those terms yields about a 6:1 ratio in favor of the former.
/r/MensRights20/09/11 03:58 PM
6

It wasn't really, but it never stopped him from claiming it was when chatting up women in the bar.
/r/MensRights20/09/11 03:54 PM
1

And that is probably only a possibility because it sounds liek she pled no contest rather than guilty.
/r/MensRights14/09/11 04:28 PM
2

They can be, I'm just saying how unwilling people are to hire one. It's just another notch in the pedo fear belt.
/r/MensRights14/09/11 03:12 PM
7

They've already implied this time and time again.
/r/MensRights14/09/11 01:07 PM
9

Not to make light of the article, but please don't sensationalize titles, it serves no purpose other than to give ammunition to those who fight against the Mens Rights Community. The woman was a teacher's aid in an elementary school, not a teacher, and likely never had contact with the victim in an official capacity (for a number of years at least). Did she receive a lighter sentence than a man in the same position would? Probably, but then again a man would never be hired as an elementary schoo…
/r/MensRights14/09/11 01:07 PM
1

Can you blow me where the pampers is?
/r/MensRights09/09/11 07:03 PM
3

Yes, but the federal government isn't mandating anythting in regards to stealing now, are they? The fact is, when your entire future could rest in the hands of a few people judging you, you shoulf be entitled to the strictest scrutiny of the evidence possible. We have seen on numerous occasions where there is no recourse for students who have been faced with disciplinary action for alleged sex crimes at the school level after being exonerated at the criminal level.
/r/MensRights08/09/11 03:59 PM
1

I don't know which bothers me more, "Stupid guy" or "woman who can't take a shit"
/r/MensRights08/09/11 03:39 PM
4

It's tricky. A private institution should be allowed to adopt whatever administrative rules it wants to in regards to student disciplinary hearings. State schools should have to follow the laws of the state, which to ensure correct investigation procedure, they should refer all potential criminal cases to the appropritate authorities to be treated properly rather than trying to bring about some sort of end around on the justice system. The problem is the Federal Government has stepped in and sai…
/r/MensRights08/09/11 01:23 PM
5

But why is an administrative body deciding what should be decided in criminal courts? If they want their own judicial procedure and they are a private school, that is fine. The outrage comes in when the Federal Government is mandating the administrative bodies to adopt their procedures rather than establishing their own or risk losing federal funding.
/r/MensRights08/09/11 01:16 PM
17

Not at all, just someone who thinks it's important to know your rights.
/r/MensRights08/09/11 11:41 AM
18

This isn't a criminal or even a court procedure, how are they going to force a alleged victim to testify if she doesn't want to? 6th Amendement, clarified in Crawford v Washington. You have a right to cross examine the accuser.
/r/MensRights08/09/11 11:30 AM
3

I'd be ok with this.
/r/MensRights07/09/11 07:40 PM
1

That's nothing, watch the preview. Jump to about 28 seconds and tell me how you feel.
/r/MensRights31/08/11 04:24 PM
7

Sarah Jessica Parker isn't dead yet.
/r/MensRights31/08/11 04:17 PM
0

Luckily for me I don't care about downvotes. I love that they made a novelty account just for your username. If there was ever a better example of open and shut reddit stalking I don't know of it.
/r/MensRights30/08/11 06:42 PM
-2

I'm sorry, I didn't see the dash after your name. You're obviously not the same Aerik that is a mod of /r/againstmensrights.
/r/MensRights30/08/11 06:30 PM
-3

Since his post starts with "What the fuck do I do?" I'm going to guess he'd welcome advice. You call this subreddit a "circlewank" yet are mod of a subreddit that bans anyone who voices any dissenting opinion, not matter how politely they do so.
/r/MensRights30/08/11 06:18 PM
1

Well if she can't find him or doesn't know who he is, then his financial responsibility should already be null and void.
/r/MensRights28/08/11 04:29 PM
1

Women play something that looks like hockey, but it isn't. If you can't check, it's not hockey. It's like saying a hamburger is a t-bone because they're both beef.
/r/MensRights27/08/11 02:41 PM
1

As a William and Mary alum, in the Philadelphia area no less, this disappoints me greatly. Edit: In his defense though, what he has done is try to get schools to take a proactive approach in defending themselves against Title IX claims. His business is not truly about ensuring justice for either the alleged victim or alleged offender. Rather his clients are the schools themselves, who are trying to find a way to say "Look, we've done everything we can within reason to not create a hostile enviro…
/r/MensRights27/08/11 12:35 PM
1

Well, I'd imagine there would be some type of paperwork invovled at the time of notification. For example, when you refinance a mortgage, you have a 3 days to rescind. At the time of signing, you have to sign a document acknowledging that you only have 3 days to do so, and then if you decide to rescind, another box on the form to sign. I'd could see a document that the father signs at the time he is notified, and yet again when he wants to terminate his rights and responsibilities.
/r/MensRights26/08/11 11:13 PM
51

I'm on the same page as you, but I think the window needs to be longer. Women might not even know they were pregnant for a month or more. I would make the window 13 weeks, making sure there is ample opportunity to know for certain about a pregnancy, but still giving the woman the option of abortion.
/r/MensRights26/08/11 03:07 PM
5

They'd probably create a sockpuppet to call you a fag for baking and then link to it as someone here "defending" traditional gender roles.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 02:48 PM
1

They do speak out against anti-male laws, but in the same breath blame them on patriarchy.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 02:16 AM
14

I don't think its anarchism in general he has a problem with, just /r/anarchism. One looks at /r/metaanarchism shows just how crazy and ban-happy the mods are, and they happen to have a lot of overlap with /r/againstmensrights and /r/feminisms
/r/MensRights22/08/11 02:30 PM
8

That's hardly an answer to my question. You are the non-gender specific term for royalty of evading questions.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 01:41 AM
10

If it's relevant to the subreddit, who the fuck cares who posted it?
/r/MensRights22/08/11 01:10 AM
2

I'd read it, but it's been removed.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 01:21 PM
1

Goddammit there is some funky formatting going on here that's not accepting my prime marks.
/r/MensRights17/08/11 09:07 PM
1

{P => Q} != {P=> Q}
/r/MensRights17/08/11 09:00 PM
5

"Just 'cause you're hung like a moose doesn't mean you gotta do porn."
/r/MensRights17/08/11 04:42 PM
2

Aren't these the same people who constantly complain about politicians who are anti-abortion even in the case of rape. So a woman is raped and gets pregnant, and shouldn't be denied the right to end the pregnancy, but a man is raped and is then forced to pay for the child that results from it?
/r/MensRights16/08/11 01:09 PM
6

I was just about to say, someone posted about this in /r/Philadelphia, then I saw it was you. I was hoping it was a Philly.com news story or something. Either way, you're doing good work. On a side note I'm really interested in finding a copy of that paper
/r/MensRights13/08/11 12:51 PM
0

Nope.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 11:35 PM
4

Haha, You can't win kloo. I don't support downvite brigades, but I do feel like disabling downvoting in fear of them is a little unfair. Half the mods there submit links that are given no context, are quotes taken out fo context, or are in no way in line with what they claim their mission is.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 04:01 PM
10

I can't find the story, an frankly I'm afraid to google it for fear of what might come up with the hazy details I remember. But I recall a story I read of a father being questioned about photos of pictures he had developed at a chain drug store. He had taken his sons camping, and they had a "tradition" of putting out the fire by peeing on it. The dad found it funny and snapped a photo, the girl processing the pictures called the police. I don't remember if he was charged, but it still is enough …
/r/MensRights09/08/11 11:02 AM
2

It's still asinine, subscribers should be able to downvote submissions and comments that add nothing to the discussion or are clearly not in line with the mission statement of the subreddit.
/r/MensRights07/08/11 03:18 PM
2

That doesn't seem slightly authoritarian? It's like when Cuba would claim to have democratic elections, but Castro would be the only one running.
/r/MensRights07/08/11 12:00 PM
2

Except the mods have used custom CSS to try to make it as difficult as possible to downvote
/r/MensRights07/08/11 02:00 AM
2

Except half their posts are just links to posts in /r/mensrights without any sort of context whatsoever. They labeled a post that was trying to get a link submitted to /r/reddit.com about a man who was beat by his was with a wine glass as a "Men's rights invasion thread". The submitters of /r/againstmensrights (who almost all seem to be mods of the sub, and many of them mods of /r/anarchism, have largely ignored what they posted is the purpose of the subreddit, which is to expose bigotry, and tu…
/r/MensRights04/08/11 03:28 AM
29

Pro-er tip: Do use it at an afterparty with the bridesmaids present.
/r/seduction02/08/11 07:53 PM
5

Women say I'm being a sexist pig when I chase after stick thin women. I say I'm just protecting myself from the day I am held down and forced to have sex against my will.
/r/MensRights01/08/11 12:44 AM
7

I hate when people throw around that 50% number because they don't fully understand what it says. Close to 50% of all marriages end in divorce (and like you said, that number is dropping) that does not mean close to 50% of the people who get married will get divorced. The 50% number includes people who get married/divorced numerous times. Someone who gets married and stays married only contributes one marriage to the "didn't end in divorce" side, whereas someone like Elizabeth Taylor adds seven …
/r/MensRights29/07/11 04:42 PM
1

This is true... many car insurance companies factor credit score and education into your risk premium, of which black men statistically have less fo both.
/r/MensRights27/07/11 07:07 PM
3

I think the people commenting in that article are more dangerous to the public than any one pedophile ever will be.
/r/MensRights24/07/11 09:11 PM
5

She fails to realize in anyway how illogical what she is saying is. Yes, the man approaching he in the elevator displayed a tremendous lack of tact. Yes, he is probably very socially awkward. The problem is socially awkward people don't realize they don't have tact. People with social skills also don't publicly lambaste the socially awkward on video blogs. I think the moral of the story is the socially apt have better things to do than attend atheist conferences.
/r/MensRights23/07/11 12:30 PM
1

"Was" but probably not "is." She is a Kennedy, but there are a ton of kennedy's, so the family wealth is pretty well distributed. Ah-nold has been on of the biggest action stars there is since they were married in 1986. That being said, there still is no way she needs to lean on him for financial support.
/r/MensRights22/07/11 03:07 PM
3

Really I think that's the only solution left, but in the end it makes us no better than them.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 04:28 PM
2

There was a good discussion of that (and why it woudln't work) here.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 04:14 PM
1

Then it goes to the father. The mom is relinquishing parental rights anyway, so she gives her, for lack of a better term, 50% share in the child to the father.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 04:11 PM
2

Exactly. And I would be ok with making a time limit on the father's ability to do so. That way he cannot decide to abandon his responsibilities after the woman can no longer terminate.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 04:09 PM
1

Yes, because regetting decisions made the night before automatically counts as date rape.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 04:03 PM
3

This is to a degree, true. I posted somewhere on reddit just a few days ago that notaries are legally obligate to not notarize documents signed by someone who appears intoxicated. Now I've never seen a car loan notarized, but I wouldn't be surprised if you could make the argument.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 03:55 PM
14

Either that or they just hit up the cougar bar and leave the college girls to dance in a circle around their purses.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 03:52 PM
2

Infiltrated, not run and moderated by. Reddit is a free and open committee and people can enter into any subreddit they please. The mods of r/mensrights actually believe in the way reddit is supposed to work, and don't feel the need to flex their muscle just because someone enters the room they may disagree with.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 08:37 PM
3

No problem since I didn't even know it existed until now. edit: They don't have downvotes? Lol.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 05:47 PM
13

Exactly. This has Film-Noir Detective dialogue all over it.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 10:44 PM
1

I agree. I oversimplified it a bit. I also agree that "slutty" women can be raped. I realized after I wrote it that it came off a bit more misogynistic than I had intended. However, as you clarified in length, I think the fact that a mere accusation can have such weight in a criminal trial whereas the past actions of an accuser can only be used to call into question the evidence at hand tips the scales a little heavily to one side.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 03:36 PM
2

So a guy was falsely accused of sexual assault, was never convicted, and yet that can be used as evidence. A women tells a friend "I'll fuck anything with a dick" before pulling a train of like 20 guys and that's not allowed to be mentioned?
/r/MensRights19/07/11 02:15 AM
1

Can you provide some examples? Because I spend a lot of time here and I do not pick up on that at all. Much of what is posted here is rallying against cis-women and the courts who support them who view men as cash machines and that our only duty is to support them.
/r/MensRights18/07/11 02:58 PM
2

You clearly have no idea what men's rights is. One of the basic tenents of the movement is that it is not OK to try to define what a "man" is. As MRAs, we denounce socially constructed gender roles. We want it to be OK when a woman wants a family and a career. We praise men who decide that along with that interest they want to stay home and raise the family so his wife can achieve her career goals. Along those lines, if a biological boy wants to wear dresses and play Barbie, that's ok. If he wan…
/r/MensRights18/07/11 02:43 PM
37

Dear Black Person, Can't you understand that some white people might be intimitated when passing you on the street? That their heart might quicken just a bit and anxiety turn up just a notch? You should be courteous and cross the street when you see a white person walking on the sidewalk, because you don't know of you might be causing them stress. Signed, A white person who understands not all black people are criminals
/r/MensRights15/07/11 01:59 PM
8

Honestly, I can't imagine a normal man ever having that thought. If I was allowed to read the thoughts of 20 men and try to decide which one of them was most likely to become a rapist, I would choose him.
/r/MensRights15/07/11 01:57 PM
1

The more correct response is "Oh really? If it wasn't [athlete/movie star/politician], you wouldn't have fucking heard about it. Maybe we should wait until someone is convicted instead of just accused before releasing their name."
/r/MensRights14/07/11 11:00 PM
3

I'm assuming he's talking about RISUG, which just had it's last clinical trial last year on the way to approval. It wasn't pharmaceutical companis holding it up. It was looking like it would have been approved in India in 2002 until a new health minister was appointed and held it up again.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 08:01 PM
4

It has nothing to do with Big Pharma. it's a fairly recent development that the testing phase of has just recently concluded in India. I've read that the clinical trials for FDA approval should begin here soon. Your real problem is with the FDA who for some reason can't accept trials dnoe outside of this country.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 07:02 PM
0

What about women who, while underage, mislead multiple men into believing they were of the age of consent, and thanks to strict liability, ultimately led to the conviction of those men?
/r/MensRights13/07/11 12:29 AM
14

This is what I need to know. I would be fucking pissed as hell at him (once we were out of sight of the girls of course)
/r/seduction09/07/11 01:00 PM
3

I was going to comment on motherjones.com, but I really didn't feel like wasting a well reasone argument on someone who wasn't going to listen.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 03:28 AM
5

-10? Did I just Poe Law myself?
/r/MensRights06/07/11 02:05 PM
-8

Well if an evil man-pig is shoving a lead pipe in a woman's uterus he's obviously enjoying it and probably ejaculated in his pants
/r/MensRights05/07/11 08:54 PM
8

I don't know if I'd want to play viking games with an elusive wizard
/r/MensRights05/07/11 04:23 PM
-1

People exist who don't know Gene Rayburn?
/r/MensRights05/07/11 03:47 AM
13

"She was so fat..." -Gene Rayburn
/r/MensRights04/07/11 05:51 PM
1

But age of consent is 16 unless you're in a supervisory position over the person.
/r/MensRights29/06/11 03:14 PM
1

judges are allowed to use their own discretion when deciding if an offender has to go on the sex offender registry or not This actually is not the case in most states. If a person is convicted of a crime that is on the list of offenses that require registration, the judge is statutorily required to place them on the registry.
/r/MensRights29/06/11 03:06 PM
3

The real problem is you have to get the case in front of a Jury.... I actually was in this situation. You can check my comment history, I'm pretty open about it (probably more than I should be, but I believe it needs to be told.) The DA's office piled on every possible charge they could think of. By time they were tone, I was looking at a minimum of 30 years if convicted on all counts and forced to serve them consecutively. My lawyer said we wouldn't even be allowed to mention her lying about he…
/r/MensRights29/06/11 02:56 PM
1

Theoretically he could be, depends if the DA wants to exercise prosecutorial discretion.
/r/MensRights29/06/11 10:45 AM
4

There is absolute strict liability in 31 states, meaning as long as the girl is below the age of consent, it does not matter how old the "offender" belieed her to be, regardless of the reason he believed it. In a certain number of other states (8 or 9 IIRC), strict liability only applies if the victim is under a certain age by which it has been determined that no one, under ordinary reasoning, could assume she was above the age of consent. In most of these states, it is set at 12, which is usual…
/r/MensRights29/06/11 12:55 AM
-4

Don't you mean commas? Though I'd really hope you'd find it true without the comma as well.
/r/seduction23/06/11 01:12 PM
2

You've got that wrong, if they're your own balls, it's not gay.
/r/MensRights22/06/11 11:11 AM
3

Go to Panama.
/r/MensRights22/06/11 01:07 AM
1

Comparing a horse to car makes you an asshole, whether you like it or not. Hardly ad hominem.
/r/MensRights17/06/11 06:18 PM
0

A car isn't a living fucking thing, you asshole. You don't give a horse to someone who can't take care of it. The expectation when he gave it was that he would also be paying the cost of taking care of it.
/r/MensRights17/06/11 05:30 PM
1

Except you cant just leave a horse sitting in your driveway...
/r/MensRights17/06/11 05:06 PM
0

He's framing it as a gender issue because both statistics and anecdotal evidence suggest men are more likely to negotiate higher starting salaries and ask for raises. This supports the idea that any pay gap that exists is not because of discrimination against women. You could take your argument to complain everytime someone says women make less because they take time off from their careers or work part time to have and raise childred. You of course could march in and go, "BUT MEN WHO WANT TO TAK…
/r/MensRights16/06/11 11:32 AM
7

How is this a Men's Rights Issue?
/r/MensRights14/06/11 11:26 AM
5

Mask off or on?
/r/seduction13/06/11 03:35 PM
3

Men can stop rape by simply being informed of what something like that does to another person I just don't envision a rapists going "Oh, if I had known how much this was going to affect you, I never would have raped you."
/r/MensRights11/06/11 06:22 PM
1

BUT THAT'S NOT WHAT COURTTV SAYS!!!!
/r/MensRights11/06/11 06:08 PM
8

Ah, the Scientology defense.
/r/MensRights11/06/11 06:03 PM
2

Where'd you leave the gun?
/r/MensRights08/06/11 01:08 AM
16

Sure, anyone can be a good parent. But the question is what if the husband doesn't want to be a father to children that aren't biologically his? Where are the true fathers? To say that he isn't being forced into raising kids that aren't his because he is "none the wiser" is simply ignorant and heartless.
/r/MensRights06/06/11 01:42 AM
20

The rage with hipsters is usually the opposite of stylish.
/r/seduction05/06/11 11:35 PM
1

I know that, but to say that one is somehow inherently better than the other without being independently verified by a first hand account is meaningless and probably rarely available. Many women cannot climax without clitoral stimulation, and the clitoris is the anatomical homologue to the head of the penis, so in the end, the important part remains in tact.
/r/MensRights05/06/11 05:03 PM
-2

I hate this argument because no uncircumcised man can say they know what it feels like to be circumcised either.
/r/MensRights05/06/11 10:23 AM
36

Protip: Put it in her vagina, try to put it in her ass.
/r/seduction31/05/11 11:53 AM
11

D is the variable denoting the length of my penis when erect. 8 is it's length in inches. :-D is the face your mom made the first time she saw it.
/r/seduction31/05/11 11:52 AM
2

I think part of the problem is why would anyone take on that risk? Sure there are plenty of hardworking women out there who won't take some guy to the cleaners just for the heck of it, the problem is trying to identify those who will before hand. No guy has ever entered into a relationship going, "I know if things ever go to shit here this woman will make my life a living hell." It sucks but until the laws change where a woman (not all women) can screw you over royally in court, it's better to b…
/r/MensRights29/05/11 05:59 PM
3

As opposed to a straw man, which is just bad debate form?
/r/MensRights28/05/11 10:29 AM
2

If you really are filming it for your own protection in light of a false rape accusation, then she would never find out unless she made a false rape accusation.
/r/MensRights27/05/11 02:53 PM
-3

That's not even close to your "Spend 10 days in prison and you WILL be raped" comment.
/r/MensRights24/05/11 10:53 PM
-16

While it happens, it is nowhere near as common as you seem to think it is.
/r/MensRights24/05/11 07:33 PM
1

Kind of like "Mike and Molly," but less funny.
/r/MensRights23/05/11 11:25 PM
8

It's only failed me once... but only because she had two dads.
/r/seduction21/05/11 10:39 AM
10

They probably just ban all articles about Nickelback. . . they've got some things right.
/r/MensRights21/05/11 03:08 AM
3

That's some real conversation for your ass.
/r/MensRights21/05/11 03:08 AM
12

Actually, I'm kind of OK with being forced to pay for the horse. He bought it for her knowing if they ever broke up she'd never be able to pay for it's care (though 5100 a month seems a little ridiculous.) The horse shouldn't have to suffer because the couple split. tl;dr: Never buy people a gift that requires an ongoing financial commitment by them, particularly when they can't afford it. "Oh gee, thanks for the cell phone that I now have to pay for shitty service for."
/r/MensRights21/05/11 03:06 AM
2

That might be the single, most nonsensical analogy I have ever heard. The sentence happens after you've been found guilty. Likelihood of a white guy having committed offense X after being found guilty? Damn near 100% (sadly not 100%). Like a black man having commited offense X after being found guilty? Pretty much the same. Therefore the sentence should be the same. Insurance premiums have to be based on a level of risk, otherwise the entire insurance system would collapse. It is impossible to c…
/r/MensRights13/05/11 11:02 AM
5

We have to nitpick because that's the way insurance works. I understand actuarial science and therefore, no, I don't get pissed off that I pay higher insurance just because I'm a man.
/r/MensRights13/05/11 04:18 AM
1

I agree as well, but this also means women aren't allowed to complain about having a higher health insurance premium.
/r/MensRights13/05/11 12:43 AM
5

As much as it sucks, I'm much more interested in the section below it that says in 2006, the irish Supreme Court declared strict liability in statutory rape cases to be unconstitutional. I've always thought it sucks that someone can be forced to register as a sex offender and treated as less than a full citizen for the rest of their life because some girl decided she wanted to play grown-up one night and lied about how old she is.
/r/MensRights11/05/11 02:39 PM
4

J-Lo disagrees.
/r/seduction11/05/11 03:05 AM
8

Something tells me the shirt is almost irrelevant. Hot girls aren't going up to hideous trolls asking them to grab their asses even if the troll has the Midas touch.
/r/seduction10/05/11 10:41 PM
2

Well communication is a two way street, obviously asking questions is a part of that. The problem is how many men are going to think to ask someone if they are trans unless it's already somewhat obvious? The question is, what of they don't tell the other person? Let's say a relationship does develop out of something that at first the only expectation was a fun hookup? Obviously at some point the other person is going to have to find out, and since sex is such an intimate act that can get tied up…
/r/MensRights08/05/11 02:45 AM
2

There still is a degree of expectation. We often discuss false rape allegations in this subreddit. One of the causes of false rape allegations is the regretted consensual sex. If both partners had come to know the expectations of the other before engaging in sex, this risk would be minimized. Likewise, you can't just assume that because you are post-op and extremely passable that the other person would be comfortable with the idea of having sex with a trans-gender. It doesn't matter that you fee…
/r/MensRights08/05/11 02:32 AM
2

I furthered my explanation here
/r/MensRights08/05/11 02:24 AM
5

As someone who has dealt with the exact hypothetical you're describing, the answer is yes, he absolutely has an obligation to tell her. The reasoning behind it is the same as for a trans-woman disclosing that to her partner: people enter into relationships with certain expectations on what they get out of the relationship for what they put into it. Both parties have a responsibility to express ther expectations to their potential partner, and also be sure they understand their partners expectati…
/r/MensRights08/05/11 02:02 AM
7

I wouldn't say immediately, but when you're comfortable enough with him to tell him, but before you have sex. You don't have to blurt out "I'm a tranny" the moment a guy asks you out, but as others have said here, some men may not be comfortable being intimate with you, and it's something you have to accept.
/r/MensRights08/05/11 01:58 AM
1

What makes women aged 30-40 who are single with no children a less worthwhile demographic. I haven't found one that dealt with that demographic, but my guess is there is simply fewer of them that it becomes to find a random enough sample to take confounding factors into account.
/r/MensRights03/05/11 10:56 AM
1

Because if they're not those things than there are other factors to consider as well. Women under 30, single, and childless are likely to work the same type of hours and place the same value on career over home/family life as men in the same age group. Outside of that, there seems to be evidence that men earn more money simply based on the fact that they are more likely to ask for more.
/r/MensRights03/05/11 02:43 AM
3

Also your statement about women getting paid more than men is completely non-factual. A recent study showed that women in 147 of the 150 largest cities in the US, women who were under 30, childless and single made 8% more than their male counterparts.
/r/MensRights30/04/11 12:53 PM
6

I said dance. I don't sleep with strippers.
/r/MensRights17/04/11 04:55 PM
6

If she needs money.... she can come dance for me.
/r/MensRights17/04/11 04:36 PM
1

And if you know the dance from the video, you WILL be sleeping with someone that night.
/r/seduction17/04/11 01:36 AM
6

You and me, baby, ain't nothin but mammals
/r/seduction16/04/11 11:40 PM
3

If you're a college student, your school likely has some sort of legal aid resource for you. Do not talk to the police. Don't talk to them first, don't talk to them when they try to talk to you first. Don't talk to crazy girl. Save the texts she sent you the day after. It sounds like she isn't serous about pressing charges, hope it works out for the best.
/r/MensRights16/04/11 01:06 PM
2

And then get arrested for child abuse.
/r/MensRights16/04/11 02:52 AM
5

A broad spectrum? His "broad spectrum" went as high as "terrible father". How is that based on any evidence other than the guy giving a bunch of money away? For the record I made no claims to the validity of the woman's statement one way or the other. I simply pointed to the fact that labeling someone a terrorist (even in doing so in the case of establishing a "broad spectrum") rarely adds to debate, if for no other reason than those with moderate opposing views won't take you seriously (the ext…
/r/MensRights09/04/11 02:55 PM
5

Calling someone a terrorist who in now way is one does not add anything to the discussion. And you're probably Hitler.
/r/MensRights09/04/11 01:04 PM
3

Stop throwing around the word terrorist, it makes you a douchebag. FTFY
/r/MensRights09/04/11 01:00 PM
2

/r/MensRights... where fun comes to die.
/r/MensRights07/04/11 01:41 PM
1

I think you and llamatron are arguing different sides of the same coin. In the history of mankind, we have decided that the sacrifice of certain individual liberties for the protection of a society was preferable. In doing so, those societies have a fiduciary duty to those who have joined into it to act in their best interest. Scarce resources dictate that conflict inevitably arises because of competition for their resources by societies that are each acting in the interest of the people it is b…
/r/MensRights07/04/11 01:29 PM
1

You should probably avoid eating brazil nuts then.
/r/MensRights07/04/11 01:17 PM
0

No, Ace, just you.
/r/MensRights07/04/11 01:13 PM
12

"Think your girlfriend is cheating? Punch her in the ovaries until she confesses!"
/r/MensRights06/04/11 11:34 PM
2

That's when you go, "Oh! No No No. I said 'niggard'."
/r/seduction05/04/11 03:39 PM
1

Shockingly, the Submission Form under "Contact Us" on the Men Stopping Violence website does not work.
/r/MensRights05/04/11 03:13 PM
11

Lift with your legs, not your back
/r/seduction03/04/11 11:24 PM
1

Have you ever been in prison? It's not even close to the same.
/r/MensRights02/04/11 10:52 PM
3

I agree. She probably poses more danger to future boyfriends than 90% of people on sex offender registries pose to anyone.
/r/MensRights02/04/11 06:59 PM
2

The only point I've gotten out of ANYTHING you've posted is you probation is almost on par with being in prison.
/r/MensRights02/04/11 06:57 PM
3

I mean, what about statutory or ambiguous situations? You mean like guys who get arrested for having sex with a girl who lied about her age and then get sentenced to 4 years in prison and has to register for life as a sex offender even after the "victim" admitted to her deception?
/r/MensRights02/04/11 03:03 PM
3

do you think it's justice for sex offenders to be placed on a list so people can watch out for them? Not sure which side you're arguing for here, but my answer is absolutely not.
/r/MensRights02/04/11 02:56 PM
-3

I'm a dude. I'm just playing devil's advocate.
/r/MensRights30/03/11 03:14 AM
-9

But a preference for 8 inch dick at least has a degree of utility to it, and a reason to the preference, where as breast size is (mostly) just aesthetic. The only reason for dating a taller man other than aesthetics is s he can reach something in the cupboard for you.
/r/MensRights30/03/11 02:46 AM
1

OP should probably lean up against it and make her go through another door that he has not passed through. Just so there is no misunderstanding.
/r/MensRights29/03/11 04:39 PM
4

Well, she was being quite bilious.
/r/MensRights29/03/11 03:56 PM
6

That's kind of my point though. It's not a sexual thing, it's just men letting out their barbaric yawlp.
/r/MensRights25/03/11 05:23 PM
10

Guys around my campus often shout at me from their cars. I'm not even female. These fuckers just drive by and shout various slurs or yelp at me for no apparent reason. Further proving that this has little to do with sexuality. Do you really think 95% of women are of a level of attractiveness that men shout at them on the street as one study mentioned in the article claims? I realize that beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but I'd have to think more than 5% of the population would go unnoticed…
/r/MensRights25/03/11 04:42 PM
28

Does that mean I can beat Mayor Nutter and the Chief of Police for ignoring due process?
/r/MensRights22/03/11 03:30 PM
1

I wasn't referring to the article. I was referring to the fact that he was arrested and charged with abduction and held in jail for more time than anyone in that situation should have.
/r/MensRights22/03/11 11:14 AM
23

Becuase, if you notice, the girl was never named in any of the articles, she's is only mentioned as "the accuser." One paper said she could not be reached for comment, which I suppose means her identity wasn't known, but it seems more like she just was making herself unavailable. his name was dragged through the mud, while she gets to remain an anonymous heinous bitch. That being said, we can consider this a victory against a fascist police state, ratherthan a victory for men's rights issues. Wh…
/r/MensRights21/03/11 07:26 PM
15

and the nose plays.
/r/seduction21/03/11 07:15 PM
2

It can make that HB you actually want think "hey, my ugly friend seems to like this guy and he seems into her too" and she'll back off. This. If an unattractive girl is with a very attractive friend, and the attractive one isn't a total bitch, she's going to realize her friend gets hit on very little, and she gets attention all the time. If there are twenty other guys in the place that will flirt with her she will leave you to her friend. So your hope is you're the only guy in the bar hoping to …
/r/seduction20/03/11 03:14 PM
24

Further proving that the HB part is just fucking retarded.
/r/seduction20/03/11 03:10 PM
2

Yeah, it could be that. But I more mean meeting someone and not thinking of how to sleep with her as fast as possible. But there are plenty of places to meet people if you try to take initiative to actively participate in activities that interest you.
/r/MensRights20/03/11 12:05 PM
1

Pretty sure it was just an analogy.
/r/MensRights19/03/11 09:39 PM
3

Always use your own condoms.
/r/MensRights19/03/11 09:37 PM
2

Plus, there is a difference between "meeting" a girl at a bar and "picking up" a girl at a bar.
/r/MensRights19/03/11 09:29 PM
4

but you cannot lay the responsibility for such cultural programming at the feet of men, solely. I'm 29, and my female friends are much more likely to encourage each other to have children than male friends are. A friend of mine had an accidental pregnancy recently. Her female friends told her she should keep it because "It will be cute," or "It will be fun." (In their late 20s... sad) Our male friends (myself included) told her she barely makes enough to pay her bills, keeping it based on "it wi…
/r/MensRights15/03/11 05:03 PM
1

Find girl dancing without a guy. Walk up behind her. Say "what's your name?" Grind away.
/r/seduction11/03/11 03:52 AM
5

No, but the fact that you have to stretch the distance out to 135 miles, a distance no normal human would ever have to cover, makes the whole point the author made rather ridiculous. The book is just another example that you can prove almost any thesis you want if you just know how to pick the right statistics.
/r/MensRights06/03/11 05:34 AM
10

You want us to classify "I won't be your friend" as "threatened... in a way we shouldn't trivialize?"
/r/MensRights05/03/11 03:28 PM
1

As of today, I'm a child psychologist.... because I said so.
/r/MensRights03/03/11 12:46 PM
5

Yes, but the statistics show men are more likely to get in accidents than women. A man with accidents on his record will have a higher premium than one without any either way.
/r/MensRights01/03/11 04:18 PM
11

The problem is statistics show a freshly minted 17 year old is much more likely to get into an accident than a 30 year old, but is also much less likely (sometimes impossibly so) to have a previous accident on their record. By your logic, a newly licensed driver should have no premium?
/r/MensRights01/03/11 03:13 PM
-4

Just imagine if courts decided casinos offering roulette had to offer the same payout odds on inside numbers as betting red or black.
/r/MensRights01/03/11 03:02 PM
-7

Seriousl.? You're angry about the fact that you were circumcised at birth? Go bitch to your parents, stop trying to make it into a societal issue about "men's rights." I'm sorry, but you don't speak for all men. I, for one, am glad my parents snipped me.
/r/MensRights23/02/11 07:23 PM
-11

Well, isn't religious freedom also a civil right? From what I've read, the propoition makes no exception for relgious practice, so maybe the author is pointing out that when they call themselves "civil rights advocates" what they mean is "rights we care about" advocates.
/r/MensRights23/02/11 02:06 PM
2

Compare that to a drunk person on teh ground at a party dancing accidently kicking out (elaine dance) and kicks you in the shins really hard leaves a big bruise. Except that's not violence, that's someone doing something stupid. To equate that with punching someone in the face is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights15/02/11 05:26 PM
2

It's not misleading at all. Why should it matter that her punching him in the face and him yelling in her face occurred at different times? How is it not hypocritical to say that he should be "behind bars" while cooling it off, but say nothing about the fact that she actually punched him in the face. His actions may be taken as a threat of violence, but her actions were actually violent in nature. I'm not defending Ronnie, I've always thought he was a roid raging meat head who probably will put …
/r/MensRights15/02/11 03:53 PM
3

I have to agree, no one is forcing you to buy a girl a drinks, therefore it is not an issue of your rights
/r/MensRights15/02/11 03:18 PM
4

Not jacking off will also lead to fat chicks coming home with you.
/r/seduction10/02/11 06:08 PM
5

You don't happen to be in South Jersey and she works for Nabisco? If so, very nice score.
/r/seduction10/02/11 01:54 AM
0

I was just curious. I'm a straight male, don't really have any problem finding women for whatever purpose I'm looking for at the time, and frankly, I feel creeped out by reading some of the stuff in here. I feel like the only people who post are either sleazeballs or socially inept losers who want to be the sleazeballs. Most of the stuff here is common sense, I would think. I'm sure there are plenty of normal guys who kind of lurk in the wings just trying to pick up some tips. Maybe all they wan…
/r/seduction26/12/10 06:24 PM
2

Do you ever see posts that make you feel kind of creeped out?
/r/seduction26/12/10 02:00 AM
2

I think Angelina Jolie Films have more going for them than just a bad-ass female lead. Let Gabourey Sidibe play Lara Croft and see how many guys flock to see it.
/r/MensRights28/09/10 02:00 AM
1

The source for that graphic is also listed as "own work"
/r/MensRights20/09/10 02:56 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter