| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 | TRP philosophy only makes sense for lust/sex-centered relationships. It fails to address other forms of attraction (intellectual, emotional, spiritual) that can exist between partners. | CMV | svaroz1c | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/06/15 05:06 AM |
| 1 | How does physical attractiveness/masculinity correlate to good genes? Which is more important? | Question for RedPill | svaroz1c | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/06/15 01:47 AM |
| 1 | What was the one "rock bottom" moment in your life that made you reevaluate your approach to women and relationships (and eventually led you to the Red Pill)? | Question for RedPill | svaroz1c | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/06/15 03:57 AM |
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Poll: who has more extroverts?INFJ | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/06/15 02:08 AM |
| 1 | Morality and Sexual AffairsOh, I'm aware. Please do tell me more about how worshipping yourself as your own God is very rational and how we can't help it because it's human nature so we might as well all be sociopathic assholes. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/06/15 11:31 PM |
| 1 | Morality and Sexual AffairsSo you follow the advice of self-proclaimed Satanists. Good to know. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/06/15 11:18 PM |
| 1 | Morality and Sexual AffairsWhat if their just engaged? Same thing. That's a contract. What if their just boyfriend/girlfriend? If they made a mutual agreement to remain monogamous, you're still just as much at fault. What if the guy just has a crush on her? There's no bilateral agreement here; no contracts being broken. Some of us see it for what it is and recognize that the whole thing is one big competition and everything else is just arbitrary. Translation: "Instead of controlling my desires, I will make elaborate excu… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/06/15 08:17 PM |
| 1 | Morality and Sexual AffairsSo I take it you don't regard helping someone cheat as deception? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/06/15 06:35 PM |
| 0 | Morality and Sexual AffairsYou're not getting this. No, it's not your responsibility to fix anybody's marriage or ensure the enforcement of their contract. But that doesn't mean you're free to do the opposite, either. You're basically saying "I'm getting sex; nothing else is any of my business". To what other lengths are you willing to go to obtain a few minutes of pleasure? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/06/15 06:08 PM |
| 1 | Morality and Sexual Affairsblame the user not the tool. Again, Eichmann rhetoric. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/06/15 05:28 PM |
| -1 | Morality and Sexual Affairssomething which isn't my concern in the first place Looks like this is where we disagree. If you witness someone about to commit an immoral act that you have the power to prevent, it should absolutely be your concern. It is your duty to stop it, not exploit it for the sake of your own gain. Now, what the woman does without you is none of your business. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/06/15 05:25 PM |
| 1 | Morality and Sexual AffairsIt's not just any decision, it's the decision to break an agreement. Exploiting this and assisting with it for the sake of your own pleasure is selfish and dishonorable. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/06/15 04:51 PM |
| 1 | Morality and Sexual AffairsYou don't know that. By refusing to sleep with a married woman, you are making it more difficult for her to cheat. If enough men did that, theoretically speaking, then she might have eventually given up and/or gotten divorced. And anyway, you can enjoy the exact same pleasure with an unmarried woman. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/06/15 04:45 PM |
| 3 | Morality and Sexual AffairsBeing the facilitator would be immoral only if your goal was to inflict pain to the cheated party. It doesn't matter what your goals or intentions are - if you harm someone but say "but I didn't intend to harm them!", that doesn't change the fact that you harmed that person. That's some Eichmann rhetoric right there. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/06/15 04:18 PM |
| 0 | Morality and Sexual AffairsAnd you have assisted her in breaking this agreement. It doesn't matter if you're not part of the agreement; assisting someone in breaking their promise to someone else is of questionable morality. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/06/15 04:16 PM |
| 1 | Morality and Sexual AffairsIf you have intimate relations with a woman you know is married, then you are committing an immoral act. You're not the one breaking the contract, but you're still the facilitator. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/06/15 04:11 PM |
| 2 | How does physical attractiveness/masculinity correlate to good genes? Which is more important?Your superiority complex is showing. You call anyone who doesn't completely understand your ideology a "BPer"? Can you not read flairs? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/06/15 04:01 PM |
| 4 | How does physical attractiveness/masculinity correlate to good genes? Which is more important?40% of U.S Billionaires are of a Jewish Lineage Wouldn't that make them beta bux? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/06/15 04:45 AM |
| 3 | How does physical attractiveness/masculinity correlate to good genes? Which is more important?Natural evolution already takes care of that It may have done back in the day, but with the advanced medicine and egalitarian societies we have today people with inferior genes can lead long, relatively normal lives, and their genetic inferiority won't put them at a significant disadvantage. Also, consider the Ashkenazi Jews. They are notoriously prone to a wide array of hereditary ailments, yet they have existed as a distinct ethnic group for around 2500 years. So evolutionary pressures haven't… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/06/15 02:21 AM |
| 2 | Is it our "duty" to have children ?How is there no such thing? The groups of people you interact with - family, coworkers, superiors, subordinates, partners, etc are all part of society. And yes, an individual certainly does have duties to society - caring for family, obeying the laws, voting, helping those in need, being aware of the consequences of his actions - all these are duties of the individual, whether he realizes it or not. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/06/15 10:40 PM |
| 0 | TRP philosophy only makes sense for lust/sex-centered relationships. It fails to address other forms of attraction (intellectual, emotional, spiritual) that can exist between partners.I'm confused. I thought TRP was all about rational thought, yet you attempt to justify it by using a "feelings" argument, and say rational thought is impossible in such situations. Do you mind explaining? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/06/15 07:20 PM |
| 0 | TRP philosophy only makes sense for lust/sex-centered relationships. It fails to address other forms of attraction (intellectual, emotional, spiritual) that can exist between partners.If no sex = constant anxiety for you, then I would say that's definitely not a healthy mindset. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/06/15 06:57 PM |
| 2 | TRP philosophy only makes sense for lust/sex-centered relationships. It fails to address other forms of attraction (intellectual, emotional, spiritual) that can exist between partners.So when you have sex with a hooker, you call that your "relationship"? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/06/15 06:55 PM |
| -1 | TRP philosophy only makes sense for lust/sex-centered relationships. It fails to address other forms of attraction (intellectual, emotional, spiritual) that can exist between partners.Let me rephrase that - "If all you need is sex, that means your mind is not occupied with other problems." And, let's be honest - there will never be a time in your life when you've solved all your problems. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/06/15 03:52 PM |
| 4 | TRP philosophy only makes sense for lust/sex-centered relationships. It fails to address other forms of attraction (intellectual, emotional, spiritual) that can exist between partners.A red pill advocate will tell you that love is just a bunch of brain hormones making you feel a certain way responsive to sexual desire, a desire for security, a desire for validation, a desire to avoid loneliness, and so forth. A blue pill advocate will tell you that love is the core of every successful romantic relationship Those two definitions are not mutually exclusive; they're just different ways of explaining the same concept. Red pill will tell you that fidelity, respect, and sex are the… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/06/15 03:42 PM |
| 2 | TRP philosophy only makes sense for lust/sex-centered relationships. It fails to address other forms of attraction (intellectual, emotional, spiritual) that can exist between partners.They don't necessarily attract all women with high sex drives, rather the ones who let their sex drives and instincts define their actions. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/06/15 03:27 PM |
| 1 | TRP philosophy only makes sense for lust/sex-centered relationships. It fails to address other forms of attraction (intellectual, emotional, spiritual) that can exist between partners.And that's the problem with your beliefs - you think the friendzone is somehow wrong and humiliating. It's not - very often, it's just a natural stepping stone into a more meaningful relationship. Just because a girl doesn't immediately want sex doesn't mean that she isn't attracted to you. Maybe she just needs her time to figure you out on a deeper level. And that's fine! | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/06/15 03:17 PM |
| -2 | TRP philosophy only makes sense for lust/sex-centered relationships. It fails to address other forms of attraction (intellectual, emotional, spiritual) that can exist between partners.If after that all you need is sex, then I wouldn't say you're intellectually, emotionally and spiritually satisfied. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/06/15 03:12 PM |
| -3 | TRP philosophy only makes sense for lust/sex-centered relationships. It fails to address other forms of attraction (intellectual, emotional, spiritual) that can exist between partners.Sex is the only thing a woman that I'm into offers that I can't get from absolutely anyone. If she's not fucking me, we don't have a "relationship." Seriously. False. You can get sex from a hooker. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/06/15 03:05 PM |
| 5 | [General Question] Why is it on the surface, TRP seems very reasonable. Yet it's users tend to be hate-filled?TRP is opposed to feminism because they see it as a movement that attempts to ignore or outright deny certain biological differences between men and women. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/06/15 04:07 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter