TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

taco_roco Archive

View 0 posts and 71 comments by taco_roco on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Right, but the above comment is making the point that users like incels are effectively filtered out as long as the mods are on top of things. Sucks to be them though.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/21 02:34 PM
1

This sub's purpose is practically designed to attract them, or at the very least misogynists. Im more surprised it's escaped so many ban waves
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/21 02:29 PM
9

Anyone can boil down an argument to 'lol cucking whiteknights ruining it for the rest of us lol just calling em like I see em!', but it's such a half-baked thought it's better suited for a circlejerk sub. It's barely a level above a trolling. Most of us grew out of that stuff in high school, carry on if you have yet to graduate.
/r/MensRights28/12/18 10:38 PM
2

to expand off /u/twolanterns, the idea behind making these connections is to use both sides of your brain (if you assume the theory that one side of the brain is creative while the other is logical). By creating a little 'story' to go with whatever information you want to memorize, you make far more connections within your mind and store it better
/r/TheRedPill11/06/16 01:03 AM
17

this read like one of those clickbaitey 'one simple trick to make $5K in 5 minutes! The secret bankers don't want you to know!'
/r/TheRedPill11/06/16 12:51 AM
1

I think many people go through that stage of being angry at the world, and focusing it on the group we feel has wronged us, but it easily becomes a crutch if you don't grow out of it. I come here specifically for self-improvement as well. I would prefer it if this sub steered itself away from all the fluff pieces about SJWs and sluts
/r/TheRedPill02/06/16 12:53 AM
18

This sub is at its best when it focuses on positive male roles and strategies
/r/TheRedPill29/05/16 02:22 AM
3

Pity sex by its own admission is pitiful. How anyone could be satisfied by that is beyond me. Equating it to rape beyond 'They didn't actually want to have sex' is a weak analogy.
/r/TheRedPill18/05/16 09:36 PM
2

People have types. Your game could use work. Your confidence might need work. Above all, shit happens. Challenge yourself again.
/r/askTRP13/05/16 04:03 AM
22

If she asked for a ride home from an ex, while drunk, while you were dating, and didnt tell you about it, thats a fuckton of coincidential bullshit. If she pulls this within the first couple months of dating, expect more of it. You can confront her and put your foot down, or you can walk away from her altogether. The choice is yours.
/r/askTRP13/05/16 03:57 AM
1

Ive done some of the things before, and its kind of like flipping a coin. You may get the desired response, you may draw her in and force her to come to you, but it's a short term solution to what is often a long-term problem. It all depends on what kind of game you want to play
/r/TheRedPill09/05/16 11:57 PM
1

As someone who's been helped by the TRP before, who tries to defend TRP every now and then - cause really, i know youre not all this stupid - how can y'all be this stupid? As anyone should be able to understand with a little bit of thought process. people can change their preferences in life. Were you the same person you were when you were 20? Do you expect a person's lifestyle and preferences to remain static for the rest of their lives? People can do things they dont like, grow up and realize …
/r/TheRedPill15/10/15 05:34 AM
0

Feminists completely ignore I think the biggest problem with feminism is that it is incredibly hard to define just what feminists as a whole believe. many other feminists do not agree with SJW beliefs, or hardly know they exist to begin with. if there was ever a point that Feminism could be considered a monolith, it certainly isn't now.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/15 11:21 PM
0

Calling someone a 'whiteknight beta' because they disagree with shit is as logical as 'mansplaining'.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/15 04:53 PM
5

A lack of self-confidence. I've always had a theory that because women have been artificially enhancing their beauty for the past several thousand years (or however long, whatever), their bodies are no longer capable of 'naturally sustaining' their attractiveness. No science behind it mind you, just an educated guess.
/r/TheRedPill02/02/14 04:30 AM
8

Never thought about it like that. A man looks the way he looks - you can't really take it away from him. A woman's is carefully crafted and easily ruined.
/r/TheRedPill02/02/14 04:14 AM
0

give it some time.
/r/TheRedPill16/01/14 05:22 AM
-2

Did... Did you just use the words of actors to try and prove some point about women in general? Like... What if this was just an inside joke? Context is pretty vague here, and this is a snippet of a conversation overheard by someone else, then relayed to readers by a tabloid journalist. Oh yes, I'm sure we got the real 'story' here. Even if this was true, who gives a flying fuck? Most actors are as out of touch with reality as you can get (besides power-drunk dictators I guess), basing any gener…
/r/TheRedPill16/01/14 05:18 AM
1

I actively read up on your post, interesting read. How did you come to the conclusion that all the women were gold diggers though?
/r/TheRedPill16/01/14 05:02 AM
1

This is... Exactly what I've been thinking this whole time. I was wondering why I kept being reminded of conspiracy nuts and liberal/conservative flamers, and it's because of the fucking cult mentality they have. Buzz words like 'sheep', 'wake up', 'libtard', 'conservatard' replaced actual logical thinking. They might have meant something at one point but they were twisted to encompass anything adverse to their beliefs. Not to mention you'll find these same words like 'alpha' and 'beta' on 4chan…
/r/TheRedPill16/01/14 04:39 AM
-3

I think the fact that people just dismiss this as 'feel good bullshit' and 'blue pill' reminds me why TRP is out of touch reality. I agree with you 100%, you raised valid points that aren't 'feel good bullshit', they're what it takes to create a working relationship with an actual woman, not a dependent child.
/r/TheRedPill14/01/14 07:48 PM
1

Yes, my idea of circlejerking is having lengthy debates with people. Spot on.
/r/TheRedPill14/01/14 05:44 PM
2

I've been thinking about making a thread myself, it's the reason I've been lurking for so long. I'm trying to get some evidence of where the 'truth' of the TRP falls short, and why. Enough that I'm not simply downvoted to hell. I think it has a lot of potential, but it also has a lot of trends that undermine any actual critical thinking. Not sure if I'll ever follow through though.
/r/TheRedPill14/01/14 05:25 AM
1

Is there a reason for this question?
/r/TheRedPill14/01/14 03:26 AM
1

Oh yes, very low cut. Half of these women aren't slutty, the most you could argue is the girl with the tramp stamp. It's not predatory, creepy or pervy (or whatever else some like to throw out there) to admire for a second or two, but if you're just leering at some chick (like the actors here are) it's openly disrespecting them. Respect is the key word here - Judging someone as slutty and therefore not deserving courtesy is bullshit.
/r/TheRedPill14/01/14 02:47 AM
1

I'm not actually sure if you're trolling or just a fucking tool...
/r/TheRedPill13/01/14 09:01 PM
1

Couldn't it be argued that feminist anecdotes follow similar, recurring themes/events? I mean, if they're feminist anecdotes, they're probably dealing with an issue regarding feminism, just like a TRP anecdote would be dealing with a redpill issue, and would be a recurring topic. I mean, by that logic, a feminist anecdote isn't much different from a redpill's.
/r/TheRedPill13/01/14 06:55 PM
3

Make sure you post a video of the presentation too.
/r/TheRedPill13/01/14 06:39 PM
5

I think you're missing the issue here. The way they looked at these women was the problem. They weren't casual glances in passing interest, they were lewd glares that are socially unacceptable. It's fine to admire people and move on, it's disrespectful to actively fuck them with your eyeballs.
/r/TheRedPill13/01/14 06:37 PM
1

Doesn't TRP use anecdotal evidence all the time? As for 'hard evidence', where's the hard evidence of feminists 'scared of the mere concept of sex robots' here?
/r/TheRedPill13/01/14 06:11 PM
2

This is what I've been seeing to. Being 'unplugged' and 'redpill' involves objective analysis and critical thinking, but I often see people here throwing words like 'hamster', 'feminist', 'beta' or 'cock carousel' around like it's actually making a valid point. I've been here for a couple months now and it's a fairly consistent pattern.
/r/TheRedPill13/01/14 06:04 PM
2

You're completely missing my point. This little experiment OP performed falls more in the realm of social sciences - i.e. psychology and sociology. But as we know, he is an endocrinologist, which falls outside of that category (or at least, there are few overlaps). What I'm saying is (as an example) assuming a pediatrician can conduct a reputable experiment in the field of microbiology doesn't make sense. Being an expert in one field doesn't make you an expert in another. There are several diffe…
/r/TheRedPill13/01/14 04:48 AM
2

Well reducing something to absolute simplicity would make anything sound, well, simple, but that doesn't make your argument valid whatsoever. It's like saying the Pyramids or the Taj Mahal are just a bunch of rocks stacked upon each other. That the Mona Lisa is a just some silly pain-strokes done with pretty colours. That the Statue of Liberty is just a hunk of metal. Actively construct your criticism, don't take cheap shots.
/r/TheRedPill13/01/14 04:16 AM
1

like, before saying it, he acted humiliated, insecure and shit, and after saying it, he acted SO differently that they couldnt help but being overwhelmed by his manly essence? Yes, what I really meant was that the doctor was bi-polar. Spot on. Now let's assume the doctor's right, these women truly are only interested in him post-reveal (29/30, mind you). How do we know it wasn't simply the status of doctor that interested them? Is it not at least possible (Holy shit it's like I don't deal in abs…
/r/TheRedPill13/01/14 01:04 AM
3

Do explain how this is 'armchair wisdom'.
/r/TheRedPill12/01/14 08:53 PM
1

I'm not dismissing results, I'm questioning them. We have all of a handful of sentences to go on for evidence, but any speculation I put down is dismissed with "Oh you weren't there" (Even though you can make claims as if you were there yourself). I'm not judging, I'm speculating. I'm asking how we can take one observation with potentially flawed results and throw out 'gold digger'. I'm not even saying they are flawed, or that the doctor is actually wrong, I'm pointing out why taking one man's w…
/r/TheRedPill12/01/14 04:18 PM
0

Takes 3 words of mine and makes unrelated claim. K.
/r/TheRedPill12/01/14 04:02 PM
1

Yeah, I'm sure your armchair analysis of his personal experiences are much more accurate than what he personally saw with his own two eyes, right in front of him. Nice. I'm offering an objective analysis of all the variables he would have a hard time/couldn't control for (i.e. what anyone versed in the scientific process knows to undermine any findings) and you just blow it off as 'armchair analysis'. He was talking about girls who he was just talking to like at bars/parties and such. Think my a…
/r/TheRedPill12/01/14 08:59 AM
2

I've been on something like 30 dates in the last year... Specifically mentions dates. If his idea of a 'date' is parties and bars, for 30 women, he either isn't treating them right or they aren't the most quality of women, results skewed either way. It's possible that his test-persona comes off different than as a doctor (I'm also guessing he had to leave out some juicier details that would give him away), it's possible this is subjective analysis, different women altogether, etc. But nope, gott…
/r/TheRedPill12/01/14 07:23 AM
2

That's fair, but we have to assume the women are interested at some level because they're on the date in the first place. We also know that he was sorting them himself because he states it. but we also don't know what he said specifically, so jumping to the 'gold digger' conclusion is, well, jumping to conclusions. Maybe they relate to the doctor aspect more because it's something more accessible/understandable? For all we know he could have been downplaying himself far more compared to when he …
/r/TheRedPill12/01/14 06:29 AM
1

From what I've gathered it's essentially a way for a woman to evaluate a male's SMV. Failing it lowers SMV. I see plenty of parallels between the definition and his 'hypothesis'.
/r/TheRedPill12/01/14 02:14 AM
5

Isn't this just shit testing? I thought we looked down on that.
/r/TheRedPill12/01/14 01:29 AM
1

I need to watch this again now. I know it's just a movie, but goddamn if I don't wanna see Gump tarnished like this.
/r/TheRedPill11/01/14 06:57 AM
1

The difference between our points of view come from I don't believe sluts clam up without an agenda of securing a mate. The problem with this is that you believe that 'sluts' have one and only one mindset: they want validation (through sexual attention), and they want it for their entire lives. Of course there are people who are like that - they'll be sluts even when they're old and wrinkly. What that doesn't account for is that no one person is a identical to another. Each will have different e…
/r/TheRedPill07/01/14 08:09 PM
1

Basically theirs a level of validation in the sluts "wand waving" hey look at me I'm respectable and deserving now. When truth is no one has to validate you in anyway shape or form and if people still want to look at you like a slut that's their M.O. If a 'slut' improves herself and does become someone respectable and deserving, then they probably wouldn't flaunt their new-found self-esteem, since that would indicate that they actually have a Fragile SE, which would mean they haven't really impr…
/r/TheRedPill06/01/14 10:25 PM
2

That's a good point but what I'm saying is /u/puaSenator's reasoning could apply to anyone who's made a lifestyle choice, and is basically stating "Who you are now doesn't matter because of what you were then". You are defined by your past, despite what you may have done to improve yourself. "Once a beta always a beta", "Once a drug addict always a drug addict". Background is an indicator of behaviour, but it by no means defines someone for the rest of their lives (as OP's statement suggests oth…
/r/TheRedPill06/01/14 10:09 PM
6

It’s pretty straight forward and simple: if she’s a hoe or was a hoe, it means she has the mentality of a hoe, and once a hoe always a hoe. A hoe doesn’t just wake up one morning and think, “You know what? I’m done being a hoe. I’m just going to magically erase all that baggage that lead me to be a slut, and become a perfect wonderful woman, deserving of the best man in the world.” But back on the real world, it doesn’t work like that. Hoes are broken. Their damaged goods. Sorry, but that just d…
/r/TheRedPill06/01/14 04:54 PM
2

It was sarcasm -.- should probably have added the obligatory /s....
/r/TheRedPill18/12/13 05:57 PM
2

But the cool thing is to proclaim how you're standards of attractiveness are sooo above her. Cause you're that cool.
/r/TheRedPill18/12/13 08:13 AM
0

Implying she has to be fat to make a certain point?
/r/TheRedPill18/12/13 08:13 AM
2

It's not that I'm skimming or cherrypicking, it's that at the moment I'm focusing on the negative aspects of TRP that i disagree with. It's like Christianity (and why I'm not one): I like the bible, it has good ideas, but some of its people suck. I'm combing through TRP looking at the positive aspects (placing value on self-confidence, evaluating social interactions and developing objective theories about them) and the negative (misogyny, sociopathy). What I'm positing is that alpha/beta mixture…
/r/TheRedPill12/12/13 11:09 PM
1

"Beta" behaviors are far more useful in a marriage and long-term relationship setting If we wanted to look towards a real 'truth', wouldn't it be better to strive for qualities that are both 'alpha' and 'beta'? In TRP, the mantra is alpha fucks, beta buck's. Alpha qualities are desirable, beta qualities are despicable. OP even casts a man who likely abused the woman as an 'alpha', putting him in a positive light, while the current bf is cast as some beta loser; this is not an isolated issue eith…
/r/TheRedPill12/12/13 09:03 PM
-1

"Beta" is TRP shorthand for "guys women won't feel that spark or chemistry for." So if a self-described alpha fails to spark 'chemistry' with a particular woman, does that make him a beta? If a man displaying beta-traits sparks chemistry with a woman, does that turn him into an alpha? Either way, I feel this sub would be much better off without its jargon.
/r/TheRedPill12/12/13 07:30 PM
11

No... not really. TRP focuses on the male point of view, male sexual strategy, male issues, etc. TRP is more likely the male response to feminism, a yin and yang relationship.
/r/TheRedPill27/11/13 11:25 PM
3

I like this answer best, no bullshit attached.
/r/TheRedPill27/11/13 11:13 PM
1

I thin that's closer to the truth, however I don't think either should be condoned (male or female manipulation), because it just perpetuates a negative feedback loop of shitty dating/ONS tactics. Woman manipulates man ==> Man left with a bitter view of women/dating ==> Man manipulates other women ==> women manipulate other men ==> rinse, repeat, recycle. It's a flawed system that too many people subscribe to, consciously or not.
/r/TheRedPill25/11/13 09:08 PM
9

As someone who's been lurking for a couple months now, and still on the fence on how to define TRP, I'll say this: It's not that the TRP is wrong (all the time), it's just put in an asshole manner. People don't respond to that well, be it truthful or not. Side note, the contradictions that pop up from time to time are a bloody mess.. Women are evil because they try and manipulate men (i.e. shit-tests), but when men do it it's perfectly okay and should be encouraged. Back to lurking...
/r/TheRedPill25/11/13 03:53 PM
2

Probably because people don't recognize that's it's crude humour. If some posts are serious, and some pseudo-serious, and said serious posts are hard 'truths' about dating, it's hard to know where the line is drawn.
/r/TheRedPill20/11/13 06:59 PM
23

Im legitimately curious to see just how much shit would hit. A glorious shit storm it would be.
/r/TheRedPill04/11/13 06:03 PM
29

Probably 'cause she treats you like a friend. This isn't exactly hard evidence of future fucking
/r/TheRedPill28/10/13 05:29 PM
1

There's a bigger issue here. We've reasonably established that they're in a monogamous relationship. Now in said relationship, to sleep with another person would be a breach of the relationship, and would entail repercussions (loss of trust, break up). Her suggesting he sleep with other women allows him to sleep with other women without said repercussions. He's not even supposed to sleep with other women to begin with, so agency really wasn't a factor. In one scenario he commits an act that, if …
/r/TheRedPill27/10/13 10:52 PM
0

She hasn't addressed it in a mature or rational way, no question. If she expressed this based on an insecurity, then evidently there's something that needs to be addressed in the relationship. Why is she insecure? If he wants to help her get past it, how can he do so?
/r/TheRedPill27/10/13 10:26 PM
1

I've seen it. No backlash, happily married. These scenarios exist. Some women are a lot more easy-going than others (not assuming this woman is, but all the same).
/r/TheRedPill27/10/13 10:14 PM
-2

It's possible that she is manipulating him. It's also possible that this was a legitimate suggestion that involves no backlash. Even so, the more important detail is how this speaks to her insecurity in the relationship, not her manipulation
/r/TheRedPill27/10/13 09:25 PM
-8

He could also say 'Nah I'd rather just stick with you' and this becomes a non-issue. Again, if she has a problem with that then it's clearer that she's being manipulative. I guess it depends on how you look at it. I find it hard to believe that she's 'ordering' him to fuck other people without being allowed to refuse. If that is the case, then this isn't about her trying to control his sexuality so much as it is her indirectly expressing her insecurity.
/r/TheRedPill27/10/13 09:12 PM
6

Out of curiosity, how is she dictating the relationship? Why is this bad? Should a man be the one to dictate it, or should it be balanced?
/r/TheRedPill27/10/13 08:22 PM
0

I've tried that line of reasoning with many people (men and women both) - If they have an ounce of pride, it won't work.
/r/TheRedPill24/10/13 03:46 AM
2

I don't see how fighting one double standard with another works. It's like saying "hey here's one pile of shit, and here's another pile of shit - problem solved". (Kudos on the stereotype btw).
/r/TheRedPill24/10/13 03:23 AM
2

Haha, that's a good one - almost thought you were serious.
/r/TheRedPill24/10/13 01:30 AM
2

I type one sentence implying that interactions should not be based around a power struggle, and you turn that around in your head to mean that I'm projecting the opposite of my own statement? Huh.
/r/TheRedPill20/10/13 01:09 AM
-11

Careful now, your talking sense. Its like you dont treat interactions with the opposite gender as an eternal power struggle...
/r/TheRedPill19/10/13 10:12 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter