TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

tacobacalao Archive

View 0 posts and 97 comments by tacobacalao on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Their money - their freedom to do whatever they want with it.
/r/MensRights28/11/14 03:08 PM
2

Flex arm hand is easy for a person who does not have pronounced (i.e. bulging) biceps. Think about the forearm/arm angle for a bit and the way that the muscle mass is actually detrimental in optimum performance. Pull ups are easy for a person who is relatively strong for their body weight.
/r/MensRights17/01/14 12:10 PM
9

... and for a single given input you'd get a random-ish output which is more or less accurate. No, thanks.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 09:57 AM
2

A positive on whoosh then. Thanks for confirmation. Take care.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 11:45 AM
2

whoosh or subtle troll?
/r/MensRights13/09/13 07:46 AM
8

I mean it's their body so it's their choice, right? /s SRS spilling over again?
/r/MensRights11/09/13 01:22 PM
2

http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/oppression?q=oppression Definition of oppression noun [mass noun] prolonged cruel or unjust treatment or exercise of authority:a region shattered by oppression and killing the state of being subject to oppressive treatment:a response to collective poverty and oppression mental pressure or distress:Beatrice’s mood had initially been alarm and a sense of oppression Lack of active and passive voting rights is not oppression.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 04:43 PM
0

Ok, that one is actually very easy to dismantle. You first need to look at the entirety of history of civilization till 1920 (Amendment XIX to USA constitution). True universal male suffrage came along rather late (1848 in Switzerland, 1870 in the US with XV amendment). Prior to this one had to meet very specific criteria in order to be able to vote (ownership, birth, position etc) so, if anything, it was the privileged oppressing the rest - regardless of gender. 1870-1920 saw increased immigrat…
/r/MensRights04/07/13 03:10 PM
1

Looks like they will remain in the opposition after the next election. I'd like to think that people, regardless of their chromosomal setup, see set quotas for what they are - bullshit.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 01:29 PM
2

If you believe that the contrary is true i.e. women were systematically oppressed please specify when and where did that take place so your assumption might be addressed.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 01:27 PM
1

Thanks! Nice read.
/r/MensRights18/05/13 05:25 PM
3

There are no measured benefits of having women on the board vs having men on the board. One is just as good as the other. One, philosophically inclined, might even say that they are equal.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 08:13 AM
1

The gap in the US is anywhere between non-existent and 7% depending on the study/agency when controlled for education, position and hours worked. So, yeah - there is a gap but it's not as dramatic as heralded. What, I believe, is the outset for the '77c to the dollar' crowd is that there is an over representation of women in some less prestigious occupations and an under representation in more prestigious ones. The real question here is whether we should be treating this as a fact of life and le…
/r/MensRights11/04/13 10:03 AM
7

This is ridiculous that grown ups keep having this discussion. It's a core concept for art of any sort to exaggerate particular attributes of a character to emphasize their qualities. Good/positive traits are exaggerated for protagonists and bad/negative traits are highlighted for the antagonists. Same goes for secondary sexual characteristics. On a related note - if the consumers of your product like dark chocolate you would be right to serve them an extra helping if you want their business. If…
/r/MensRights28/02/13 09:21 AM
1

recognised somewhere like a contract or something? /s
/r/MensRights07/02/13 04:09 PM
2

as pointed out above - the board can, effectively, expel you from uni wasting your time spent there and the reason for the said expulsion will stay on file - good luck with finding a new uni.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 12:25 PM
4

isn't the fax number just routed to a pdf creator?
/r/MensRights07/12/12 12:44 PM
1

The article muddles the picture a bit here: One study told 184 managers that they would have a limited pot of money to hand out in raises to employees with identical skills and responsibilities. The managers that were told they'd have to negotiate gave men two-and-a-half times the amount in raises that they gave to women before anyone sat down. This meant that the men didn't even need to negotiate for higher pay, while women were already at a disadvantage when they tried to bargain up, because t…
/r/MensRights04/12/12 09:12 AM
1

To start with - you should not have a discussion about gender equality without having a frame of reference for example: gender equality in XVIII century France. Discussing anything without narrowing the context creates a situation when one could be speaking about Saudi Arabia and the other one about Sweden. Secondly, you'd need to ask your friend what type of feminism does she subscribe to and what are the tenets of 'her' feminism. Is it liberal/socialist/marxist/radical/mix. Telltale catchphras…
/r/MensRights03/12/12 03:18 PM
2

From the study you are referring to: Yes, women work, on average, 17 hours more at home then men! At the same time men work 22 hours more outside home than women. 22>17
/r/MensRights03/12/12 02:52 PM
2

The list was originated as a method of protecting any future would-be victims. What it turned out to be is a banishment from society for the people who have had their names put on the list even after they serve their sentence. Additionally, there are some wild cases where someone is put on the list for, really, minor things like pissing in the park. Anyone who would suggest changes to the way the list is managed would be immediately branded as 'child rape apologist' or 'child molester'.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 02:27 PM
5

Why would one consider prostitution a bad thing? Human trafficking is a bad thing. Forcing someone to do something they don't want to do is a bad thing. Intercourse between willing participants who are able to consent is perfectly fine regardless of any other factors.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 10:25 AM
2

Anectodal evidence and long-debunked bullshit argument. Next please.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 01:43 PM
3

I could ask you what is 'privilege' you speak of but our argumentation would end in 3 to 5 replies with you saying 'women have children'. Please do not refer me to the non-scientific list of 'privileges' or bash me for 'exhibiting the said privilege by not admitting it's existence'. Both You and I have worked hard to get where we are and blaming anyone/anything else is just looking for excuses for one's own shortcomings. Speaking about/comparing privileges is pointless and moot unless we're talk…
/r/MensRights15/11/12 12:25 PM
1

TL:DNL: 22 y.o. female, 3 kids and pregnant with n.o. 4, 1st at 13, 2nd at 16, not using bc, has a penchant for criminals, collects $800 per month in welfare, lives in south/central LA (hoover blvd), saying that she is not very smart is an understatement. Anyway - this does not belong here
/r/MensRights14/11/12 11:04 AM
2

this is male privilege! /s
/r/MensRights14/11/12 08:47 AM
0

what? are you serious man? I'll look for the original report tomorrow and will try to cite the levels measured though from the excerpt it's clear that the difference in levels is conclusive
/r/MensRights09/11/12 09:27 PM
-1

Again - these are objective facts. I do not see this as demonizing.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 08:47 PM
0

This is no demonizing anything or anyone. A lot of external and internal differences between men and women are hormone based and, I hope, no one here will be trying to say otherwise. If anything - this study explains how the levels of fetal testosterone might affect such activities as 'exploration', 'attack' or 'pursuit'. How is that demonizing?
/r/MensRights09/11/12 11:10 AM
5

fun and giggles aside - this is sexist and does not help in overcoming hurtful stereotypes
/r/MensRights07/11/12 04:29 PM
3

A job in engineering =! a job in engineering (same for any other type of work). Even when we are talking about the same positions within the same department of the same company you need to take into account the fact that there usually is a negotiation process involved when it comes to remuneration. The brackets can be quite wide and women tend to do worse in negotiation (for example Forbes). Anecdotal evidence - I've been involved in a situation where a female colleague accepted the FIRST offer …
/r/MensRights06/11/12 12:47 PM
1

To the simple man by J.Tuwim (translated to english by M. Weyland) When every wall is hid by many new posters freshly pasted up, when ‘to the people’, ‘to the Army’, in black print stare appeals alarming, and any dolt, and any pup will take for gospel each old lie that one should go and shoot off guns and murder, poison, rob, at once; start drumming into all our noggins the ‘Fatherland’; the mob incite, bamboozle with bright-coloured slogans, egg on with ‘Our historic right’, ‘every inch’, ‘glor…
/r/MensRights06/11/12 12:18 PM
4

Body size is very rarely an indicator of one's power - examples could include Putin who is only 1.7 or Sarkozy at 1.65 (and look at Carla!). If it's easier for someone to believe that hierarchy among men is derived from the size of their genitalia then it just shows that someone was not fully briefed. As a counter example - Jonah Falcon. He is know for being extremely endowed but If anything - I'd say that looks play a more important part when a woman evaluates her 'self worth' than for a man.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 03:36 PM
3

Have you shown her this sub? That would be where I'd start if my fiancee had similar 'concerns'.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 01:07 PM
1

call me retarded to my face irl tough guy. Ad rem: there was no such statement in the comment I have replied to.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 12:13 PM
10

where does not leaving a tip get you charged for theft?
/r/MensRights31/10/12 10:32 AM
0

To start with - I do not see 'feminism' as an uniform and continuous movement. The people calling themselves feminists have been fighting for different things (sometimes opposing themselves) so using 'feminism' as an umbrella including the fringe movements is not productive. I would consider that due to the work of the suffragettes and early feminists (the fight for equal rights, right to vote, property ownership, access to education) life for men changed for the better. The sexual liberation yo…
/r/MensRights31/10/12 10:31 AM
3

Ah, the 'useful idiots' running amok in their neck of the woods, banning other opinions, calling themselves 'comrades' AND showing some morbid interest in the Red Army F(r)action ... and we ban creepshots :D
/r/MensRights31/10/12 10:01 AM
5

This is not 'hate' this are the rants of a person who needs professional help.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 11:33 AM
7

It's brilliant that market forces are an acceptable explanation for difference in wages when discussing prostitution but not when talking about other professions. /s
/r/MensRights29/10/12 09:47 AM
1

You accidentaly a thought there.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 10:40 PM
1

have you missed the 'hug' part?
/r/MensRights26/10/12 10:39 PM
-24

The personal space of a person was invaded without their consent - this is assault. I'm not sure about 'sexual' part of it but this will, most likely, be sorted out in court. To the downvoters: if you believe that this was not assault please explain your reasoning.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 03:08 PM
2

It's entertaining to see the same idea discussed ad nauseam. The facts are: *men, on average, spend more time at work *men, on average, take on more overtime *women, on average, choose careers in fields which pay less If we want to 'fight' the gap we should create incentives for men to take on more responsibility when it comes to raising children or general 'housemaking' and we should encourage women to take up more profitable careers. The question is - do the particular individuals actually wan…
/r/MensRights23/10/12 12:31 PM
1

The parents through wage deductions, of course. At the end of the day it is cheaper than paying for a nanny/creche and allows the worker to spend more time in the office. We've had that scheme in one of the offices I worked in and the company just chipped in for the CSR aspect of it which but this was not a necessity for the thing to be self-sufficient.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 09:04 AM
0

Not really. There are many ways of applying creativity when it comes to enablement which are not biased against anyone or are not prohibitive from the cost perspective. One example that I always give here is an on-site creche. If we are talking about 12hr days in the office then having a creche on site would really entice young parents, not only women, to put in extra effort and apply themselves knowing that their child is just a few stories away. Mothers could use coffee breaks to feed their ch…
/r/MensRights19/10/12 08:48 AM
58

In other words the default. I can already hear the wailing screams from our dear friends' sub.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 08:26 AM
1

Maybe the author thinks that a prompt smack on the ass is a cute reaction?
/r/MensRights21/09/12 08:54 AM
4

My response to 'are you gay or something?' is 'I'm gay as far as you are concerned' - saying this out loud once got me a round of applause and a free beer.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 09:04 AM
3

If you are assaulted it's your right to defend yourself within the means of the law applicable to your current location. I've not heard of any place that has banned or has laws against hitting the attacker's groin so you should be ok* *the caveat here is that there is a chance that by hitting the groin you can seriously injure or even kill that person. It will be then up tho the court/jury to decide if the reaction was out of proportion.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 08:55 AM
2

I know that my comment might seem to some as 'tongue in cheek' but, i'm afraid, it's not satire. Original article here As you can see femisheviks are working very hard to expand the rift between genders by fear mongering.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 03:57 PM
2

misandry don't real! Women are 'special' and should not be sentenced the same way men are. If this is not sexism then what is?
/r/MensRights18/09/12 01:30 PM
10

you either a rapist or not a rapist my friend, this is not that straightforward - have you ever heard about 'Schrödinger's Rapist'? According 'Schrödinger's Rapist' theory every male (I'm not certain if there are any age/race/disability criteria involved) is a potential rapist. The nifty theory explains the prejudice against men in all social situations. Because reasons!
/r/MensRights18/09/12 01:19 PM
1

You are making a valid point here. People partaking in online games where the core design of the game is to kill human looking characters seems to be perfectly fine. The moment we add strong language into the mix it suddenly becomes 'bad'. Weird, eh?
/r/MensRights17/09/12 03:03 PM
0

Unless of course she does not want it (abortion, abandonment, adoption). Of course. Abortion has been a part of society for a while now (first mention in writing about 3500 years ago) and has been present regardless of whether it was 'legal' or not. This is something a woman could do and seldom there was a external factor which could stop her had she wanted to. The law has prosecuted people who have facilitated in abortion though (i.e. witch hunts). Again, having a right to drop paternal obligat…
/r/MensRights17/09/12 08:40 AM
1

Are we safe to re-claim the word 'biotruths' now? No ... wait - the patriarchal society has already molded the children into conforming with their gender roles etc. /s The summary of the findings hints that the study itself might be an interesting lecture though it leads to the entire nature vs. nurture discussion (which is a big stake in the heart of some interesting theories).
/r/MensRights14/09/12 02:47 PM
0

He did not want to be a father yet he had sex with that woman. The protection they used (if?) failed and then she became pregnant. Action-consequence. The child is theirs. The woman's age is of no relevance here as long as it meets the local criteria for the age of consent. The woman's education or employment history is also not relevant. If he did not want to be a dad he should use protection (I don't know if this has been mentioned by OP) or not have sex at all.
/r/MensRights14/09/12 08:29 AM
2

The poster linked to the actual comments so you could see their context. Some of them were knee-jerk reactions, some of them were valid, some of them were stupid. My point is to make sure that we at least try to weed out the 'stupid' ones from /r/MensRights. I'm not advocating censorship here I'm proposing more thoughtful wording of one's arguments.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 02:44 PM
-1

Creepy or not but the quotes linked paint a very unfavorable picture of MR on reddit as well as MR in general. I would think we should focus on quality of content and civility of discussion here in /r/MensRights as well as in other subs as the entire MR is judged based on this. There are groups who have a different view on certain aspects of society and they are sifting through reddit to find 'dirt'. We, in the same manner skim other subs though I've not noticed anyone here cataloging our friend…
/r/MensRights13/09/12 09:08 AM
1

This! First and foremost - the child was not properly taken care of (paperclip, outlet). Secondly, these students have paid for the class and they should get the tutor's undivided attention. Both interested parties got the short end of the stick here and such behavior is unacceptable both for a parent and a tutor. The fact that the professor is a woman is of no significance here.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 02:33 PM
1

The topic here was this guys particular situation whereas you are navigating the discussion towards the balance between maternal and paternal responsibility. I think I saw a relevant topic here some time ago though I'm unable to find it. Maybe you'd like to start a new one so the discussion is not burried here?
/r/MensRights12/09/12 01:53 PM
9

There’s even evidence that women are better able to adjust to divorce Good for them, right? Would that, by any chance, be the result of biased asset division rulings?
/r/MensRights12/09/12 08:47 AM
2

I don't know what are the dynamics of your group and what types of jokes are acceptable etc. If that happened within my group of friends it would not be an issue but this is not a judgment on what/how you should feel. If you feel that it was not right please tell that to the person who pulled down your pants that you're not ok with that and that you expect her to make it up to you/apologize.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 08:31 AM
0

I will go against the grain here - the child is his regardless if he wanted it or not. It was his personal choice to have sex and accept all the possible outcomes. Forcing someone into unwanted parenthood is wrong. Unless the sex was not consensual then calling it 'forcing' is a tough argument to make. We know where babies come from and regardless of protection becoming a parent is always an option. I do not want to discuss abortion here but on the topic of 'paternal surrender' - I do not think …
/r/MensRights12/09/12 08:24 AM
3

The reason why I've mentioned military is that they provide food and board as well as help in obtaining useful skills via the GI bill. The dude's current situation is not great and service might actually be a valid option. I understand that the person has obligations towards his child and leaving the country might not be the best choice.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 03:51 PM
2

In cases like this I am almost inclined to ask that we start using 'TW'/ 'trigger warning' when linking to such topics. The dude has the family on his shoulders (the wife says 'I work part time so I do my bit!') by providing cars, house, education, expensive holidays and eating out and these wenches have the audacity to brand him 'cheap'.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 11:29 AM
5

I've not been where you are and please do not consider this an informed advice - merely food for thought: the financial obligations towards the child and the mother are unlikely to get lower if you can't afford college there is little chance of improving your income if the obligations stay the same or increase and the income stays the same this means that you'll be stuck in the current situation unless 1 or 2 change If I were in that situation I'd probably visit one of the coutries crazy89 liste…
/r/MensRights11/09/12 08:52 AM
0

Thanks for the explanation. I do get your point and understand that there might be different sensibilities at play. The persona in these pictures are not 'people' - they are products. GQ is just a medium for their promotion. If the article had been about real people then it would really irk me that a young woman's worth to the reader would be judged mainly on looks. If the piece had been in a more established paper then I really doubt that a composition like this would even get to editorial. Add…
/r/MensRights11/09/12 08:38 AM
1

Hi Demonicpoodle - not being a jerk here but your question would fit with /r/malefashionadvice than here.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 01:58 PM
2

Ethical questions aside - I would not lump together genetic alterations with genital mutilation. One is based on science and is beneficial whereas the other is based on religion and is harmful/has no proven benefits.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 12:58 PM
2

Volenti non fit iniuria - she did this of her own accord and most likely this was discussed at length with her manager/producer/label/parents etc. This was a conscious move to promote the artist's persona with the ultimate goal of increasing the profit. If anyone has a problem with LDR shown that way they should write her/her label.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 10:09 AM
1

ctrl+f 'tips'. Mystery solved.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 09:28 AM
4

White knight = man, any other approach = boy? Got it!
/r/MensRights06/09/12 08:40 AM
2

Just a word of caution - you might be branded a 'special snowflake' whenever you share the opinion you've just expressed with a feminist audience. Good luck in fighting sexism and bigotry wherever they are!
/r/MensRights06/09/12 08:32 AM
1

Wrong subreddit? The last time I checked we are not running a 'twoX' operation here.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 04:01 PM
1

Well, it's a better comparison then SRS vs. MR. Anyway - I would really detest MR going the SRS route in any way or form.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 02:22 PM
0

Patriarchy!
/r/MensRights05/09/12 09:14 AM
5

First of all - SRS is a self-admitted circle-jerk whereas MR aims to be a place for discussion. A better comparison would be to look at SRSDiscussion and MensRights. I, personally, do not feel a need for a self-help reddit for men. Maybe there already is one?
/r/MensRights05/09/12 09:05 AM
1

This topic will really read funny -you know, men speaking about women's bodies etc. The facts, however, do speak in favor of breast feeding. Breast milk is 'designed for human babies' and contains: hormones (coming from a human: the mother) DHA lipase cholesterol (FYI: this is good) accessible protein live white blood cells .. good luck finding that in formula. I cannot be bothered to look for the measured positive effects breast milk has over formula. It would be really great to see the counter…
/r/MensRights03/09/12 10:22 AM
1

Winning!
/r/MensRights03/09/12 10:06 AM
1

That's a bingo!
/r/MensRights03/09/12 09:25 AM
4

Ok, I'm in a funny after-lunch mood right now so please have mercy - I think that stuff that is or used to be 'men only' is fun and is an activity in which I would really like to partake whereas these 'woman only' events would bore me to death even if they were open to both genders. The special events as mentioned on the webpage: A Recycled Ball giving us a chance to get creative with our ballgowns (or maybe dust off the tux?), There will definitely lots of dancing at that one and The Pink Flami…
/r/MensRights31/08/12 02:01 PM
9

I have not been there and would not know for sure but maybe she is trying to strike up a conversation and have you over for tea and biscuits?
/r/MensRights31/08/12 09:25 AM
2

This! Straight Able-bodied White Cis-gender Males (SAWCSM) are the bane of all women and minorities all over the world if you believe the rad-fem newspeak. This photograph was, most likely, used to counter that argument. Miners, who are predominantly male, don't have it easy. Regardless of race. I do not believe that anyone here would even hint that there is a distinction here.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 09:19 AM
1

Too clever or 'bitchy'? Too smart or 'controlling'? Assertive or 'bossy'? Misogyny! 4 legs good! 2 legs bad!
/r/MensRights30/08/12 09:40 AM
1

He assaulted her verbally, spit on her and threw a 3 pound object at her (that could have been a 6cm lead ball or half a brick) AND had a history of domestic violence. This is NOT a story about men being oppressed but about an asshole that needs to cool off. This has no place in MR.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 03:23 PM
5

See - you just did what Anon described. You've pulled one fact, presented it out of context and blamed Anon on promoting rape myths and accuse him of being backward. You are not discussing the issue at hand but going straight for the ad hominem attacks. Grow up, fem up and learn to discuss like a mature person.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 10:39 AM
1

This is sexist by definition but it's 'good' for you as getting fit(ter?) will help you in more than one way (i.e. extending your life or making you more attractive). Don't look for excuses and hit the gym/track!
/r/MensRights28/08/12 11:25 AM
3

As agilecaveman pointed out the 'we make babies' argument is 'ableism' and disenfranchises women who can not have children. Additionally, it is very likely that the person who spoke these words lives in a country that supports pregnant women/women raising children through one way or the other. If more assistance is required then discuss/vote but using that as a 'nuclear option' in a conversation shows that the person has no more arguments on the topic you were discussing.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 09:05 AM
1

As I've linked in an another reply the fact that b.c. is free does nothing to reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies (UK case). Money spent here is wasted. Education, however, yields the best results.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 08:32 AM
1

Not engaging in sex or using contraception in order to prevent unwanted pregnancy is a choice in the same manner that eating healthy can prevent obesity and certain diseases. These are individual's choices and I understand that not everyone would want to pay for that. Ok - the following should be considered a joke: If you want to shift the onus of responsibility towards the government agency from an individual you obviously have a case of the 'commies' In all seriousness and with due respect - B…
/r/MensRights21/08/12 02:37 PM
2

In my opinion birth control should not be covered by any type of state run healthcare system. On the other hand, my fiancee and I benefit from the fact that hormonal b.c. is covered in the country we live in. The reason why I believe b.c. should not be covered is that engaging in sex and having children is one's own decission and that the cost of b.c. is not significant. The b.c. cost is, in my view, an unnecessary burden on the healthcare system and the resources could be used to a greater bene…
/r/MensRights21/08/12 10:25 AM
8

This! If it were DNA based there would have been more mismatches picked up it's much more likely for the other guy to have the same blood group as the father than the same DNA sequence* (pairs tested for)
/r/MensRights21/08/12 09:00 AM
0

You are all grown adults (regardless of gender) and can understand the cost/benefit of your actions. If having a great time with his buddies is not worth going without sex for some time then so be it - the dude made his choice. Stop being beta! Go ALPHA!
/r/MensRights30/07/12 03:00 PM
1

What follows might not be the best advice but if ending yourself is really on the table then fuck it - join the foreign legion or move to a country where you will be off the hook. If you hero out it will be just an another point to 'their' score.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 02:36 PM
3

Well, nudity for one. In most legislations there are certain rules as to which parts of the human anatomy should be hidden/can be shown. In case of the pride marches the regulations are not followed as it would appear that the government is 'gay bashing' etc. Political correctness has the better of us here. You react negatively to bastards in speeedos and I react this way to whales in bikinis but this is not on topic here - we're talking about the perception of the gay pride parades.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 03:44 PM
3

Gay pride is neccessary because homosexuals have been treated as >though they are disgusting, immoral and less than human. A large >demonstration of homosexuals gathering together and saying "Actually I'm not immoral, disgusting or less than human. I am a person >the same as everyone else". I've been to a few and I would not say that they were 'disgusting' but they were very 'extravagant' and the members were in different stages of undress. Im not lgbta bashing here but I'm pointing out that thi…
/r/MensRights13/07/12 02:21 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter