The only things that aren't true of the "common woman" is sleeping with more men and constant monkey branching, and even that is debatable because of the later points and rationalizations on why things "don't count".
or because admitting the privilege of being the selector creates uncomfortable questions about responsibility and accountability for who gets repeatedly chosen?
why say it to someone else? Reciprocation. Since idealism just leads to this: When I am weaker than you, I ask you for freedom because that is according to your principles; when I am stronger than you, I take away your freedom because that is according to my principles.
"Good Personality" means "Morally Good" in essentially every context besides attraction. Switching it to mean "Attractive" rather than "Moral" is just doublespeak to avoid saying that your choices are amoral.
have the last word here lmao Yeah, a common reason to block is to make it appear as if someone has no rebuttal. This is why you just edit the last comment.
i find so many aspects of human socialization to be a humiliation ritual sometimes This is because humanity refuses to embrace humanity instead of the beast. also the last time i tried to actively make friends didn’t go so well. re: my time on bumble bff Things with security blanket bf girl could have become fine with time.
You're linking unrelated prepositions. You can easily lose weight. You can easily kill a man. That these two things are true does not mean that you can easily lose weight by killing men.
What was promised was "you can have sex with a hot guy in hours you put in a bare minimum effort." Nobody promised the sex would be good, and that they were talking about the women's scale of male attractiveness.
That's such a huge fucking leap though. It is not. The factor being warned about with high body count is high impulsiveness. You can see high impulsiveness through other actions and a high body count is a signal to watch for those other factors.
No, they're quite willing to tolerate people being mean to them. They're not willing to gamble on the chance that standing for something will result in solitude and isolation.
whole mandatory conscription conversation because most of the people here are Americans. American has mandatory conscription. Is it active right now? No, but it is both legal and exists.
The actual problem is that conscription exists essentially everywhere, while selling your daughters to wealthy sheiks is a much more isolated legality. It's comparing the state monopoly on violence and legal recreational drugs.
It is mental rationalization of many different emotions thrown into the same category for convivence and entirely vibe-based. So to be more precise, I believe that people file a variety of emotional reactions to "love", when they are distinct, and thus "love" as commonly understood, does not exist.
I'm starting to worry that alpha widowhood is real folks. I cannot comprehend how your own emotions and experiences have not already convinced you of this.
I mean people who think bread is evil generally don't generate hate speech and try and pass laws against men... That would be silly. They would generate hatespeech and try and pass laws against bread.
That's because autobans aren't pre-emptive, they're reactive. Their bot isn't scanning the database for every user and putting them on a no no list, it's scanning posts on that sub and checking the user activity afterwards.
This is why we should bring violence back to the people. It is a mistake to lock is away under the state since people will always chose not to behave if not under direct threat.
Woman take 100000000000000000000000000000000000000000x Attraction Damage from VAMPIRE WEREWOLF BILLIONAIRE TWINK WITH A MASK, HETREOCHROMATIC EYES (ONE GOLD, ONE GREEN), [continue with increasingly specific descriptors]. Remove a zero for every missing piece.
Typal Multipliers. If you are in a woman's strike zone you can be lizardman and be the most handsome thing in existence, because their "type" preference seems to exponentially increase your attractiveness. The reverse is also true.
Basic observation of those who bear the "Feminist" signifier of their own free will often demonstrate that their stated ideals are leagues apart from their actual actions.
Even given that it is an outlier population, the outlier population appears to be significantly larger than the reverse. Thus, it is possible that on average women are more attractive to men than then men are to women.
Young women are twice as likely to be severely obese than men, and still just as obese as men (the source distinguishes severe obesity vs obesity). I really don’t buy that women are just significantly more attractive than men given this. There appears to be a somewhat sizable number of men who do like this.
That sub has a thing about the okcupid study not being a real study This has to be the dumbest argument people have. They didn't have a study, they had full population data. That's what studies attempt to replicate.
You chose to interpret "better" as higher. That was not the only option: your initial criteria may have been wrong the beginning, thus not higher, but different standards are necessary.
Men don't avoid chores generally; they simply have a different (and lower) standard than women do. If you complain when it is done to his standard and then go and do it again, do not be surprised if he ceases to do it; you have demonstrated that it is not worth putting any effort into by both providing an abrasive stimulus when it is done, and making the work put into redundant by re-doing it.
We could easily solve all the problems in dating and economics by democratizing violence back to people. Or at least bringing back the Outcasting Clause.
The manosphere would still exist even if everything worked, because like incel, it is simply a label for things that the general population don't like or find uncomfortable.
If by "media", you mean fiction, Shin Angyo Onshi changed my perspective on prespective. If you just mean "things that are recorded", people made Chapter Black real on their own.
One is under the impression that none of these women have internal lives, make informed or justified decisions, have unique preferences, or have specific qualities that require specific approaches. I am under the impression that the vast majority of humanity is like this, not just women.
No. The real necessary reform could be done in China,but never will be because they love the state monopoly on violence as much as every other country.
I believe the existence of different peaks is the result of the government monopoly on violence, as physical strength does not necessarily lead to higher status when it cannot be employed.
My cousin is a prostitute and told my grandma that she’s slept with 150 men or something like that This means your cousin was literally correct. Grandma was a rookie, she's a pro.
it accounts for it, and is built around maximizing some parts of it. capitalism attempts to allow maximalist indulgence in greed, democracy indulges our desire for accountability or scapegoating, etc. Ah, yes, this is clearly working great. I'm sure everyone loves Trump and thinks he can do no wrong, same with your local government and representatives. why fight this one? Because it wasn't working otherwise, they would have never seen the need for it. this is one of the ones you should indulge. …
Even the crazyposters here don't compare to what slop can typically be found posted by the r/all user. Or any other seemingly normal sub for that matter. That's more about the quality of /all users than anything about the people here.
I just got invited to a party that is being hosted AT MY HOUSE AND THE MAKER OF THE PLANS DOES NOT EVEN LIVE HERE The World's Most Introverted Man, Ladies and Gentlemen.
This is for rating attractiveness. Apparently, when rating attractiveness, [Your Ethnic Group] + White Hybrids are ranked the highest in all demographics except for Whites, who favor White + Asian.
Okay, since it looks like reddit stopped shitting itself and the post didn't magically show up: I give it 40/60 odds they'll refuse a gift that's not on the list.
Men tend to be very cautious about escalating conflict, since they know that people won't go easy on them if they start shit. The state monopoly on violence has had terrible ramifications for society.
First of all the government is the one to blame fellas Actually, I agree with you on this. The government monopoly on violence is to blame. If we democratize violence, many problems will be solved.
If someone fawns over you, cherishes any gifts you give, even cards, and easily accepts any olive branch you extend during disagreements, is that at least a strong sign that theres also sexual attraction? I dunno, do you think most dogs want to fuck their owners?
That’s not really conducive to actual conversation and it leaves very little space for genuine, good-faith exchange where you can both have opinions and stay open to others. Ain't no such thing on PPD.
Murdering innocent women without being caught is a skill…I don’t think that matters to most people though, it’s not something that should be valued. What do you mean? Being able to successfully kill people without being caught is the most important skill.
The only thing that meaningfully rebalances the system is globalizing the dating market. Uh, no. Letting people smash each other with fist will also rebalance it.
Or his brother tried the generic mental help options and decided suicide was better anyway. That's pretty damning anecdotal evidence that mental health is a psyop.
In fact, on this sub itself I've seen more women claiming this than any man. Yeah. I've seen like one or two guys say this. Nearly all the pink and red women say this.
If there is no ranking, there can be no elevation. You cannot move up or down if up or down does not exist. "Highest match" means the person who's the best for you, not the highest ranked one And yet, once again, there is a ranking. Otherwise any match would be the same.
The truth: there is no ranking. If this is true, then how is this possible? a] elevate yourself to feel good and at peace with your life b] find your highest possible match based on compatibility, chemistry (including physical attraction) and shared desires.
Saying I am against chocolate is not the same as saying I am against gummy bears. The statement stands as is. There is no conflict between my hate of chocolate and my love of gummy bears.
Do you have a question that mainstream science refuses to answer? Are your theories and experiments so bizarre that sensible people tell you they will never be published? Do you need help building a doomsday machine, or shopping for a monstrous assistant? Then you've come to the right place! The esteemed panelists at Shitty Ask Science might be the only people who are willing to help you! If they actually did this it would amazing. Unfortunately, it does appear to be entirely satire.
Normal adults accept that their fantasies will rarely become reality. No, no they don't. Otherwise, they wouldn't consistently vote against their own interests because they'll "make it someday".
If we wouldn't make this assumption of Western woman who happen to be dating guys in lucrative careers, why would it make sense to always assume this of foreign women? Because there are only two rules. Man Bad Woman Good
I haven't had someone deliberately misunderstand me in like 2 seconds here, what have I been missing. Did you just wake up from a coma? This is the most regular response.
I don't agree. This helps men to realize how men and women work. This helps them to realize where feminism is heading us and that, really, they shouldn't listen to them and act on their own accord. I disagree. It's evident that most people will never lose that layer of WAW no matter how many times it is demonstrated otherwise.
The amount of stories I’ve heard of men getting dumped after being emotionally vulnerable, or the amount of stories I’ve heard of men recounting their fathers telling them they shouldn’t cry, is really astounding. The first explains the second.
My ex-girlfriend was a 7/10 in person, but from her pictures, you would have thought she was a 4. This sounds more like reverse catfishing rather than bad pictures to me.
You're underselling how difficult it is to step away from the hivemind. Just look at how many men still bear the obvious marks of WAW even while being critical.
Why would you be creeped out by haunted dolls? There used to be someone here to who collected them. Not these in particular, but a different series of haunted dolls.
You're a only a sex haver if you meet an arbitrary minimum frequency, just like you're only a gym goer if you actually go to the gym more than once. What that arbitrary minimum frequency is will vary, but calling someone who goes to the gym once every 6 months or once a year (which is the threshold for most of those studies) a "gym goer" is misleading at best.
Yes, they're selfies, work headshots, weddings pictures, gal signaling, overall low quality. Which is exactly what women put up, only they usually throw in some in odd angles and clear filters.
The duties part on female side have indeed dropped drastically. The last Feminist pinnacle of idiocy I have seen is "normalizing" drinking and smoking while pregnant. Is this organization-based or some crazy person on twitter?
Is it? Dating does not exist for a single individual. There must be others, and thus, a society. Even if you do not accept this, poor treatment due to one's occupation is also a personal issue: it does not affect everyone (or rather, nearly everyone), like say, drinking water. The same could be said for almost any "societal good" that exists, there is little that affects everyone in any society.
I think posting any claim immediately requires it to be a debate which is likely intentional to reduce the amount of discussion posts, as having threads that do not promote the approved party line need to be suppressed. Making it so that only those willing to waste a few hours at minimum per thread is an easy way to accomplish this.
Sure the older you get the less significant becomes womens “dating advantage” and at some point it becomes a disadvantage I'm curious if you've seen that actually has an inversion point under like, 80, where there population of men just shrinks drastically since they die earlier.
That doesn't mean you can't wear pink, but the point was you can just get black hair ties to keep it out of the way; they aren't exclusively aggressively feminine.
It's unrealistic because the amount of effort that's necessary to "glow up" is essentially an impossible ask for general population. If it were not, they would have already "glowed up".
That there is only a handful of people stupid enough to risk their livelihoods and liberty. The error is in assuming people actually think instead of vibe.
I don't mean to judge your experience, but in my experience it isn't that they're worse than it's that they are less likely to admit accountability and more likely to obfuscate. How is this not being worse at communicating? Intentionally worse at that.
one of my group members completely chat gpt-ed her entire section this week. Expect nothing less. It's going to get worse before it gets better, if it ever gets better.
Height based filtering: The resulting yes/no is based upon the same logic of, Is [X] taller (or shorter) than [variable]. Dietary Budgeting: Eating the cookie is dependent on whether or not it would put you overlimit.
I find odd that people question the general populace's inability to suppress their biological compulsions. A look at the obesity rate or the difficulty in breaking addiction should be evidence enough.
Okay. But they do have a diet thing in their religion The fact that dirty soda exists is evidence that they're just doing the minimum required to pay lip service to said tenet.
Soda and cream is a pretty major factor in those excess calories. Most people I've seen who just cut it or switch to zero-calorie alternatives start dropping weight immediately.
Leftist don’t say their beliefs come from god. No, they have just replaced God with whatever authority figure seems convenient (a communist, a scientist, etc) and engage in endless purity spirals. "God" is simply an abstract absolute authority and leftists absolutely treat their idols as such.
It’s crazy how many right wingers Nah, it's everyone. Lack of impulse control is a defining trait of humanity, despite the possibility of acting otherwise, which is why disdain is the rational outlook.
There may also be some reddit chicanery going on, I know that several of my upvotes got removed (as in the upvote itself). Whether it's just reddit having bad servers or some hidden algo, I don't know.
It probably exists, but I’ve never seen men complain about it in my life. It's because men generally don't proudly broadcast their Ls since unlike women, they get no points for it.
men are more progressive than the west just like there are women who are more traditional outside the west. Are you crazy? There's no non-western progressive paradise, it's exclusively the domain of decaying empires.
This is where we differ. I do not believe humanity is capable of acting properly without the threat of group violence if they sufficiently infuriate others. Memento Mori is good.
The male advantage is a better physical platform (almost astoundingly so), but in the modern day, there is no real use for it as it is low status (physical jobs) or illegal (violence is the sole domain of the state). Democratize Violence, etc.
"Yeah, bro, just send it to me and I'll put it together" bro 1 sends it in like 2 weeks in bro 2 send it in day before bro 3 sends it in at 2 in the morning day of me: :)
50% of witchcraft believers should be men In Britain. Heathenism or Heathenry is essentially a revival of the pre-Christian Viking and Anglo-Saxon beliefs, which means worshipping multiple gods you may have heard of, such as Odin, Thor and Freyja. I vaguely associate this with metal music, which is another thing I don’t know much about, but it does feel like quite male territory somehow. In fact, I don’t want to insult anyone, but it’s tempting to suggest that Heathenry/Druidry and Witchcraft/Wi…
Sounds like you didn't actually read my comment and just used it as an excuse to go on a rant about things you already have an issue with. You could basically append this to about 90% of the replies here.
The vast majority of resistance is because there is no real interest in the hobby, only other ancillary reasons and the resulting changes that accrue due to WAW turning the hobby from what it once was into something else.
Humanity is not evolved enough to think ahead, so without the controlling factor of fear of violent death and reprisal, everything gets worse constantly.
Also this girl had recently broken up with a guy who would bite her and her friends, so she clearly didn't care about social skills that much in the first place. But that's another topic. The Shiny Vampires strike again.
This is just facts. Admins don't want to do anything, and unless there's a mass exodus, they will be able to continue to do so, since we are restricted from acting.
It's a common thing in trans spaces that mtf trans people feel lied to because they expected to live life on easy mode with male privilege You mean ftm?
There are a multitude of competitions to choose from, one can always find an area where they're top tier, but it probably won't be something most people care about.
Consecutive or split? I think if you're actually pushing it's more like 2 hours before accumulated fatigue wrecks any semblance of improvement to be gained in sports or hobbies.
If you're discussing "The Best" with no qualifiers, then everyone is in consideration. If everyone is consideration, then no matter how it makes you feel, the sex differences matter. This is why "Women's Leagues" and "Weight Classes" exist to begin with.
Civility and discipline form from fear/respect of death and violence. Without it, people are shitheads. Since the state has stolen violence from the people and maintains the monopoly on it, we there is little reason to gain strength of instead of embracing sneaky fuckerism.
It’s never caused any of us even a hint of jealousy or discomfort, because why would it? Hmmm. Purple Pill Bi Teen Guy (Man) Hmmm. Me and my bf literally There's your explanation.
Because if by "Good" you mean "Satan" and by "Satan" you mean "The Most Wholesome Puppy" in the universe, most people will give you side eye. You have to pretend you mean "Wholesome Puppy" even if mean "Satan", because saying Satan makes you look bad.
The neurotic traits that make you fix your schedule so you can play more video games/video games at specific are the same ones that women generally find unattractive.
Girlgame is simple and effective if you meet the looks threshold (which is generally true), but most women are so completely unused to having to put in any effort that they don't believe it exists.
I understand why someone would call him a murderer, but I don't understand why they would condemn him for it since it was in self-defense. Killing is killing.
He's probably not that much older: i’m a 15F and an older guy i was hanging out with invited me to his house see i thought we were friends (i know him from school) And drugs are entirely unnecessary if he's good looking.
"Those pants do make you look fat; You are fat." "You should not have another slice of cake." "Spending $10000 on shoes is not 'girlmath', it's just fiscally irresponsible.
This entire scenario is just a bad decision on his part; getting into a poly relationship without the marriage would have been essentially the same. The marriage is completely irrelevant, it's the poor decision making that's the issue, and that's not going to change with age for 99% of people.
I'm not sure what you think you linked, but this is what you linked. we talked about how her current boyfriend treated her badly and she told me she was polyamorous. she also mentioned she has two kids with that boyfriend and another kid with a different guy. we talked the next day and she informed me she had dropped said boyfriend. not long after that, her and i got together. then there was some off and on for a week and a half ish because of her overall confusion of what she wants. then we set…
Honestly Agartha just makes me think of a certain crab's ideal world state (unrelated to the conspiracy as far as I know; I know nothing about the conspiracy).
I feel like a major part of opposition to legal paternal surrender is the misunderstanding that it would legalize the abandonment of children already born. You're such an optimist.
They're going to think that anyway since you didn't use your degree, this way it avoids them thinking you wasted time and money on one. You're TRAIN MAN, man.
