| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | Feminist rape-culturists against new roofie detecting nail polishThat sentence was saying the opposite of what you think it was. That whole comment was saying the opposite of what you think it was. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/08/14 10:28 PM |
| 1 | Question for BPers: Is it ok to not want to commit to a woman with a lot of sexual partners?"Most" is still pretty sweeping. Have you gotten to know "most" people that closely? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/08/14 04:09 PM |
| 0 | Question for BPers: Is it ok to not want to commit to a woman with a lot of sexual partners?I understand that saying something simple and broad like that makes you feel smart, but you do understand how much of a human being's personality you're waving away with that condescending glibness right? You're saying you know enough about all people to reduce their actions to the simple motivations that you've decided are universal. What are you basing that on? The fact that it "feels intuitive"? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/08/14 02:22 PM |
| -2 | Question for BPers: Is it ok to not want to commit to a woman with a lot of sexual partners?there are simply FAR fewer good women to have LTR's with. Again, how do you know that? Putting aside the issue of what "good women to have LTR's with" even means, what are you basing this perception on? I assume "percentage of the population that Phokus would date" is not a study that's been done yet, so I have to ask: what percentage of the female population have you ever even seen in passing, let alone met, let alone gotten to know in any way? How do you know what every woman's personality is … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/08/14 03:29 AM |
| -2 | Question for BPers: Is it ok to not want to commit to a woman with a lot of sexual partners?See, this is what I'm talking about. You assumed that because women wrote those things, everyone who disagrees with TRP must agree with them. And because women wrote them, they must represent how all women think. This is the kind of oversimplified "a box for everyone and everyone in their box" thinking that TRP requires. Here's the thing, though: I don't agree with those ladies either. And a lot of other men and women don't. These women are justified in talking about what they want, but they're … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/08/14 03:14 AM |
| -1 | Question for BPers: Is it ok to not want to commit to a woman with a lot of sexual partners?When you say things like that I honestly can't tell if you're joking. In case you're not, I'm just going to point out that that's the same kind of gigantic sweeping assumption I was talking about. I honestly don't know how you can process real life experiences with living, breathing, thinking, human beings into a mindset that requires you to reduce everyone to single-minded automatons. There's so much information you must have to completely filter out. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/08/14 02:46 AM |
| 0 | Question for BPers: Is it ok to not want to commit to a woman with a lot of sexual partners?most women have biological clocks that tell them they gotta settle down sooner or later, See, it's sweeping statements like that that I find so odd about TRP philosophy. How do you know that all women feel that way? How do you know that men don't? Even if you know those things, how do you know that that's how society always has and always should function? Maybe social pressures that currently exist to push people to have kids that they don't want or aren't ready for should be changed, rather tha… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/08/14 02:35 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter