TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

targor Archive

View 1 posts and 69 comments by targor on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

targor/r/MensRights17/02/12 03:17 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Thanks for at least considering it. I appreciate the responses btw. Googling is the best I can do because im on my phone: http://www.google.ca/search?q=romance+novels&prmd=ivnsbl&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=qnFEUre_D8HYqgGN_oHIAg&ved=0CAYQ_AUoAQ# http://www.google.ca/search?q=womens+magazine&tbm=isch&oq=womens+magazine&gs_l=mobile-heirloom-serp.3...0.0.1.62.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0..0.0....0...1c..24.mobile-heirloom-serp..10.14.2780.l-SkQoyHyO8# None of these are labelled "mysoginistic" daily as gaming …
/r/MensRights26/09/13 05:45 PM
1

You say that as if men don't also portray women the way you just described. You are missing the point. The cover of ever romance novel has muscular manly men and delicate beautiful women all over them. Womens' magazines are full of beautiful women and muscular men and gave absolutely no background of "emotional trial" or anything. But women don't care about any of this. It is only the male dominated spaces that need to be "corrected".
/r/MensRights26/09/13 05:26 PM
2

The only reason this is an issue is because it is men portraying women. Media created by and for women use the same tropes. Just look at romance movies/novels, womens' magazines etc. All the women are beautiful/damsels in distress. It only becomes an issue because women feel the need to dictate how men can portray women. If it weren't for this double standard I might believe that it matters.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 04:18 PM
1

Game devs mostly make games that they want. Besides yearly triple A remakes, the devs will typically have a vision that they want to bring to life before all politics and gender issues are applied to it. So, why should men make games for women? Why should they sacrifice their visions to pander to a different audience? Women are perfectly capable of making their own games and many have entered the industry with success. Men don't have games made for them, men make games for themselves. If women r…
/r/MensRights25/09/13 07:11 PM
3

I had to read a Political Science paper in which the study of physics was criticized for "privileging time over space." The author argued that time = male and space = female, and that this was placing women in a lesser class. The whole article was absurd.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 07:46 PM
3

Feminists are hypocritical. On the one hand they want to dismantle the "patriarchy" because it not only keeps women down, but it also treats women like children with "benevolent sexism." On the other hand, these same people (who call themselves feminists) will appeal to the "patriarchy" whenever they need it. For example, just look at the recent issues with the Tropes vs. Women videos and the "donglegate" incident. In both cases, women openly opposing the "patriarchy" took advantage of their sup…
/r/MensRights05/04/13 12:15 AM
2

And as she concedes, women account for only 3 percent of Fortune 500 CEOs, 17 percent of members of Congress, and 20 of the 180 heads of state. Matriarchy? Really? No. Nobody ever mentions the wives of Fortune 500 CEO's. The way they live the life of a CEO without the work spent getting there and maintaining that position. What is the bigger issue? The fact that more men than women are Fortune 500 CEO's or the fact that for every one of those men, there is one woman who gets to live as one of th…
/r/MensRights11/08/12 12:48 AM
5

How is getting sympathetic comments for a suicide victim an "attack" on MR? I don't get the logic here.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 10:46 PM
3

I see what you're saying. I believe that parents should have the right to be parents to their biological children if they want to.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 10:39 PM
3

When women group together for support they're networking. When men do it they're an "old boys club" who just want women in the kitchen.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 10:34 PM
2

It doesn't seem that she's asked him to do anything except get lost, so my sympathy is with the mother on this one. I don't think sex should constitute a coparenting agreement by either party. Or he could just take the child and tell her to get out? Just because its her child it doesn't mean she has any right to be in its life. /s
/r/MensRights16/03/12 10:10 PM
2

I don't believe forcing someone to mutilate their genitals is an ethical way to deal with rape.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 09:55 PM
3

Take a look at this VAWA faq that was linked to me in response to my claim of VAWA being discriminatory. Judge for yourselves.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 04:16 AM
1

Disposability. It would be nice to be seen as something more than a tool to be used and thrown away.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 03:50 AM
5

Oh gee whiz! I've got all these options to juggle and choose from! I sure wish I was pigeon-holed into a single role like you for the rest of my life!
/r/MensRights13/03/12 03:37 AM
3

It's really amazing how they don't see the hypocracy in stating that they wouldn't trust their male partners to take the pill consistently.
/r/MensRights11/03/12 09:38 PM
2

(regardless of your sobriety) How can you charge someone with rape when they didn't consent to sex?
/r/MensRights11/03/12 09:13 AM
2

Makes me wonder if there have been any studies on the various ways that man are used as tools by some women. Aside from this, hiring/convincing someone to kill an ex/acquaintance of some kind comes to mind. It seems to be standard practice to just get a man to do the dirty work and then get off with a slap on the wrist when they're caught.
/r/MensRights11/03/12 09:10 AM
2

Nice try. You missed (or ignored) the part where I said: Drunk men are held responsible when they choose to have sex. I would like for you to tell me how drunk sex is equal to forced sex.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 07:27 PM
0

Drunk men and women are held responsible when they choose to drive. Drunk men are held responsible when they choose to have sex.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 11:02 PM
8

I agree with this. Girls scouts should be exactly like boys scouts, it really is a great thing for kids. The downside I see here is that the more girls that join, the less boys will even want to join. Kids these ages aren't typically interested in playing with each other. They get along with their own gender better so why force them together?
/r/MensRights08/03/12 08:44 PM
3

Anyone want to point out the futility of promoting only women in societies where uneducated men are quickly indoctrinated into violence and warfare as children?
/r/MensRights08/03/12 08:33 PM
3

"My tattoo artist doesn't know hes an asshole. You taught him it wasn't his fault. I drank too much, asked for a tattoo, had too much cash on hand. I was asking for it. He left me in front of the shop. My (ex)boyfriend left me. He called me an idiot, he called me a dumbass. I deserved it. My friends laughed at me. They called me a moron, not realizing, it could have been them. This culture, your culture, my culture, told them, told me, this was my fault. And now I have this shitty tattoo. But my…
/r/MensRights08/03/12 03:14 AM
3

You men will never understand! While you're out there screaming about your complete lack of parental rights we're fighting for real issues like increasing female representation in the top 1%!!!!!1! /s Posts like this really show how the arguments work. Feminists say something backed up by absolutely zero evidence. MRAs come in and debate it, bringing evidence when requested. Feminists disappear to their "safe spaces," and complain about all the sexism against them.
/r/MensRights08/03/12 02:30 AM
1

This is stupid. How do we have so many upvotes for a 4chan post in comparison to all of the serious posts?
/r/MensRights07/03/12 07:56 AM
11

Feminism creates a definition of opression that excludes men. Men say they feel opressed. Feminists refer to definition, defined by themselves, and conclude that men are not opressed.
/r/MensRights07/03/12 02:41 AM
5

I know what you mean. But, there is so much of this "girl power" "boys are stupid," media all over and it really needs to stop. Regardless of what is in it, a title telling young girls that boys are dogs is inherently offensive. It sets up and reinforces the idea that girls are just smarter than boys. I don't have a link to it but there have already been stories about how elementary age girls and boys already accept that girls are the smart ones.
/r/MensRights07/03/12 01:41 AM
6

I'm not trying to be antagonistic here, this is just an example, but if I were to call you an "asshole," it would still be a matter of opinion. It happens to be a generally held opinion that calling someone a dog is an insult. Putting children down should not be accepted regardless of their gender. As it is right now, putting boys down is apparently normal and accepted. Do you really believe that generations of boys being told that they're dogs, not as smart or all around worse than girls is a g…
/r/MensRights07/03/12 01:27 AM
5

The final gender attitude question asks people whether they agree that "It is much better for everyone involved if the man is the achiever outside the home and the woman takes care of the home and family." In 1977 66 percent of Americans agreed and only 34 percent disagreed. These percentages were reversed by 1994, with only 34 percent agreeing that such traditional marital arrangements were better and 66 percent disagreeing. Again, though, since 1994 there has been slippage in support for egali…
/r/MensRights07/03/12 12:50 AM
5

"Girls are catty" is a whole lot more offensive than "Girls acting catty." One implies that, as a gender, girls have a flaw. The other is that there are some girls who potentialy have a flaw. Calling someone a dog has been an insult for hundreds, if not thousands, of years. It implies that the person is a "lowly" animal or subhuman. Calling all boys dogs is infinitely more insulting than saying some girls act catty.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 11:50 PM
20

My god... I had to look. Also the comments are just great... http://www.amazon.com/Boys-Are-Dogs-Leslie-Margolis/dp/1599902214 Why don't parents care about how their sons are affected by the girl power culture infesting childhood? "welcome to the world you worthless animal, don't go growing up to be problem for society now."
/r/MensRights06/03/12 09:08 AM
6

That was sarcastic. The default answer to men who don't want children is ALWAYS "don't have sex" or "it's your fault because..." My point is that women are the ones in charge of reproduction, not men. If they don't want to or can't raise a child, then why don't we tell women to stop getting pregnant rather than men to stop having sex?
/r/MensRights27/02/12 08:21 AM
1

This just in: father arrested under biological warefare suspicions when his 6 year old son claimed that he used his magic spells to keep the bed bugs away.
/r/MensRights26/02/12 11:14 PM
21

How can women ever be "screwed" by a pregnancy when every single contraceptive/whatever to deal with not being a mother is entirely under the control of women (except vasectomy)? Why are men told its "their fault" for getting a women pregnant when she has all the options? Wasn't she the one who allowed sex without a condom? Wasn't she the one who decided not to take any sort of pills? Wasn't she the one who wants to keep it? I cannot for the life of me find any part of a relationship were a woma…
/r/MensRights26/02/12 11:03 PM
1

I mean that society and many organisations are there for women when they need help. I wasn't raped thats my point. Sometimes you do things for your SO to make them happy when you don't feel in the mood. I see what you're asking now, no I've never felt threatened by the chance of it happening.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 10:09 PM
3

FEW men are at the top of society, which is what most people look at for "equality". As a whole, women have it better with more safety nets, safer jobs, less responsibilities (you can give up your child whenever you want), longer life span, counltess female directed institutions/charities/etc. I can go on and on. There is no specific benefit to being male in society. Don't know. Until rape is taken seriously in prision, men are more at risk because they have to live in perpetual victimization wh…
/r/MensRights22/02/12 07:14 PM
2

I am become Ghandi. I believe that MR is a human rights issue that isn't limited to any political leaning. Every political group has certain beliefs about the rights of people. Having many rights or few is another issue altogether. It is just my belief that whatever rights any group accepts as human rights, both sexes should be equal in them, and that is what MRAs are for.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 07:28 PM
26

Here we see exhibit A of poor men around the world taking advantage of their high status in society over women by choosing to do whatever they want while women are forced to stay at home. (This is ship breaking in India if youre interested in looking up all the fun they get to have.)
/r/MensRights20/02/12 07:04 PM
14

You get downvoted for being an idiot. You're the trolljan horse using the guise of an MRA to spew your irrational hatred of anything "liberal," as if your American political allignment was ever relevant to MRA discussion. NiceGuySTFU might be a troll, but you are far more intrusive to any discussion that you insert yourself into than he ever was.
/r/MensRights17/02/12 08:48 AM
1

Here are some stats on heart disease and stroke.
/r/MensRights17/02/12 03:18 AM
1

It disciminates against men the same way that writing your name in the snow discriminates against women. It isn't the abortion that is the problem. That is a woman's business. The problem is that no matter what the situation, whatever each parent wants, ONLY the mother's choice matters. The mother can keep the baby, get an abortion, put the child up for adoption, or abandon it. The father can only accept the mother's choice.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 12:21 AM
1

Can't look right now because I'm on my phone but it could be from that askreddit post about reddits that people think are unknown and deserve some attention or something like that. Edit: from our main page http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/pk1o6/rmensrights_has_an_image_problem/
/r/MensRights12/02/12 02:15 AM
6

Typical. F makes an assertion. P says that's wrong. F says no it's not I and others agreed so it must be true. P explains why it is still wrong. F Well that's just like, your opinion man.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 10:58 PM
12

Calls for legislative change began in 2010 after an outcry over the case of Luke Middendorp, who was jailed for 12 years with a minimum of eight for defensive homicide. Middendorp, who was on bail and had previously assaulted his former de facto wife, Jade Bownds, stabbed her to death after an argument in which he claimed she threatened him with a knife. The first woman convicted of defensive homicide by a jury, Eileen Creamer, was sentenced last year to 11 years' jail with a minimum of seven. C…
/r/MensRights09/02/12 10:44 PM
1

Replace boys with women. Perfect.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 12:50 AM
2

This isn't SRS knock it off.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 10:57 PM
6

For anyone who doesn't get it here is the original: http://media.photobucket.com/image/internet%20white%20knight/whiteblade99/internet_white_knight.gif Also what does this have to do with MR?
/r/MensRights26/01/12 06:11 PM
2

The best part is telling someone that and then watching them "discretely" sniff it encase you were lying.
/r/MensRights12/01/12 08:20 AM
3

Guess they don't need their cheerleading squads seeing as there is no boys team.
/r/MensRights12/01/12 08:16 AM
3

Domestic violence includes: emotional abuse—blaming the victim for all problems in the relationship, undermining the victim’s self-esteem and self-worth through comparisons with others, withdrawing interest and engagement and emotional blackmail verbal abuse—swearing and humiliation in private and public, focusing on intelligence, sexuality, body image or the victim’s capacity as a parent or spouse social abuse—systematic isolation from family and friends, instigating and controlling relocations…
/r/MensRights12/01/12 02:28 AM
3

Humans, as with all living creatures, exploit each other for personal gain. In our society, men are barred by law from exploiting women while womens' exploitation of men is encouraged. That is not to say everyone is a crazy exploitative ass. Just that it happens to be easy enough for women to accomplish that the few bad ones get away with it all the time.
/r/MensRights08/01/12 01:33 AM
10

If you had any idea of how a fair and just law system works, you would not be so suprised to find that the accuser is not immediately believed. Whatever the statistics, and whatever the reasons, the law requires that the accuser prove the defendant's guilt. Not the other way around. *edit: except when it involves a female victim of course.
/r/MensRights07/01/12 07:52 PM
13

What does it do in the case of women leaving while pregnant? Can she then report her ex and get him arrested?
/r/MensRights17/12/11 07:57 AM
2

Hi again, I am replying from my phone so this one will be short. I never meant to imply that Clinton said the part about men being sent to war, it was more intended to be my framing of the situation those soldiers are in. Not her words. The problem with her words is exactly what they say. It may be my opinion, but losing your home and being poor are much better than being dead. I also didn't just mention death. Surely lieutenant Dan returning with a strong case of PTSD and two missing legs has s…
/r/MensRights17/12/11 07:52 AM
3

Yea.. don't really care about stupid pop culture songs. Off the top of my head http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JgGA-hHWxtA this fine example of humanitarianism. There are A LOT of songs with A LOT of dumb lyrics. Beyonce's song is not at all important. P.S. Bitches ain't shit but hoes and tricks, I hope this helps.
/r/MensRights16/12/11 11:14 PM
10

I don't know the details behind a lot if this because I'm not all that active, but I can try to answer some of this. Hillary Clinton was speaking in a conference on domestic violence in El Salvador when she said that infamous line. http://clinton3.nara.gov/WH/EOP/First_Lady/html/generalspeeches/1998/19981117.html She was speaking about the suffering of women (which I won't comment on because it isn't the topic were discussing) and telling them that it is women who suffer the most in war despite …
/r/MensRights16/12/11 11:01 PM
6

You think that's bad? They weren't even allowed to vote. http://i.imgur.com/wgAjO.png
/r/MensRights06/12/11 10:40 PM
6

When will they learn that helping men is good for women too!?
/r/MensRights02/12/11 04:47 AM
1

It's likely that in the prehistoric times he is talking about that women spent much of their lives pregnant and unable to hunt or build which would have left them with food preparation and the raising of children too young to hunt. When our ancestors began to wear furs they probably did a lot of the preparation for that as well. I agree with a lot he has to say, but to suggest that women sat around doing nothing from the dawn of time is just not very likely. Everyone would have fulfilled the rol…
/r/MensRights30/11/11 10:31 PM
2

It is really a difficult problem to solve. In order to be attractive to the opposite sex we cannot be seen as weak and unable to defend ourselves. Yet at the same time we are legally unable to defend ourselves physically (the basis of our physical attractiveness). So were left with cowering and looking for help from others which leads to being ostracized from the male group as well for not being tough enough. We have a gender defined largely by physical toughness and protective qualities that we…
/r/MensRights23/11/11 09:28 PM
2

Newsflash: liberal leaning people don't give a fuck about white men. That is all. It's not black and white, you fucking moron. I'm not a fox news viewer and I'm certainly not conservative. Downvote away you PC idiots. Do you even pay attention to what you say?
/r/MensRights22/11/11 11:11 PM
5

Maybe it's because you're under the impression that only women have "feminine" interests. If a man feels he wants to do something that is more likely to appeal to women then why not? A lot of people enjoy a lot of different things. People like you are the ones who restrict men the most. You are waiting with the jokes and criticism as soon as any man strays from the masculine tough guy path. If you disagree then I look forward to seeing your sarcastic drawing of a female basketball player.
/r/MensRights22/11/11 09:43 AM
6

It is a societal expectation that a man sacrifice his life for a woman. This is not equality and it is not a form of female oppression. Men who don't sacrifice for women will be shunned from society by men and seen as worthless by women. It is just as relevant to us as the "history of patriarchy" is to feminism. Either the past still matters or it doesn't you can't have it whichever way you like at the time.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 08:23 AM
3

Read through most of it before it became repetitive. Seems to focus too much on the old "helping boys understand that equality is important will make them happier too!" idea. No real tackling of issues that boys and men face besides being involved parents. Love the section on "teaching boys not to hit," that's always a classic. Overall I am not impressed.
/r/MensRights24/10/11 11:10 PM
2

Not very useful without the definition of "sexism" that the authors used. It also doesn't explain "if we bear in mind that women are the main victims of sexism..." Not sure what to get from this study, maybe someone can read the original Spanish article for us.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 07:26 AM
1

You are wrong with this one. The usual problem is that when a man is killed the headline would say "Hiker killed" instead of "man killed," which is what this article used. As unfortunate as it is for this man, he took the risks of walking in an area that is known to have bears. Why should the bear be punished for being a bear?
/r/MensRights08/07/11 05:21 AM
1

http://regender.com/swap/http://www.disinfo.com/2008/12/papua-new-guinea-women-kill-males-babies-to-end-tribal-war/ call the world police
/r/MensRights08/06/11 10:52 PM
1

"We will oppose lawmakers in the 2012 elections who support slashing programs critical to the well-being of women and their families." Unless you are a woman or in a woman's family I guess you don't need social programs.
/r/MensRights27/05/11 07:37 PM
7

Saw this on CNN yesterday: "...they did their best to make sure they didnt harm and children or any women." -Senator Dianne Fienstien on CNN talking about the OBL kill. Nice to see how caring they were.
/r/MensRights05/05/11 09:28 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter