~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The one sided nature of trans rights discussions.But also, transmisogyny does not only apply to trans women. It applies to anyone who is both perceived as being assigned male at birth and as expressing themselves in a feminine way. Hence, cis men get shit on way more than cis women for being feminine the times that they are feminine. | /r/MensRights | 07/10/14 11:38 AM |
| 1 | The one sided nature of trans rights discussions.That's what I meant, lol. I should have said that '' while trans women experience also experience oppositional sexiam, but also transmisgyny''. | /r/MensRights | 07/10/14 03:36 AM |
| 3 | The one sided nature of trans rights discussions.To answer the question in the OP, trans men aren't as feared by cis men as trans women sometimes are by cis women because people born female tend to be physically smaller and/or weaker and because trans men were not socialized to be part of the privileged gender. Even if cis men refuse to see trans men as men, the cis men have no reason to fear an agent of patriarchy lording their gender privilege over them. Most feminists these days fortunately accept trans women as women, as opposed to agents … | /r/MensRights | 07/10/14 12:02 AM |
| -1 | The one sided nature of trans rights discussions.I know- I just didn't want to get into it too much. If you want, we can discuss what Julia Serano calls "oppositional sexism", which applies to FtM people. FtM spectrum people sometimes get so absorbed in their own problems that they forget that trans women also face transmisogny. | /r/MensRights | 06/10/14 11:44 PM |
| 1 | The one sided nature of trans rights discussions.I encourage you to read something by Natalie Reed, a "transfeminist". She very much sets herself apart from the 2nd wave feminists whom you rightfully have ire for. | /r/MensRights | 06/10/14 11:33 PM |
| 8 | The one sided nature of trans rights discussions.(1) There are approximately the same number as FtM transsexual people as MtF transsexual people, but yes, the ridiculous criteria in the DSM-IV-TR that was used for so long did amount to saying that there are more MAAB transgender people than FAAB transgender people based on the social circumstances you speak of. (2) More specifically, by 2nd wave feminists and anyone else who could be considered a TERF (trans exclusionary radical feminist). Most feminists active in 3rd wave feminism and the mod… | /r/MensRights | 06/10/14 11:01 PM |
| 5 | The one sided nature of trans rights discussions.There is a lot of terminology to be understood and used correctly. It's often more appropriate to use the term "cissexism", but easier to fall back on the term "transphobia" as a catchall. This is similar to how the term "homophobia" has seen more mainstream usage than "heterosexism". | /r/MensRights | 06/10/14 10:47 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter