TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

taumeson Archive

View 0 posts and 63 comments by taumeson on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

Ok good. So the company doesn't directly have to pay the salary, universal healthcare does. See, this makes sense.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/01/25 12:48 AM
7

Someone help me understand, how does it work if you just stay pregnant over and over again? Does your employer pay for while you're on leave for the majority of 4-6 years?
/r/PussyPassDenied10/01/25 04:35 AM
1

I feel a bit attacked in this thread so I'm gonna dip, but I wrote a little more here. It's some facts, some feelings: https://www.reddit.com/r/pussypassdenied/comments/ex2quu/and_that_kids_is_why_we_have_two_christmass/fg6fmdu
/r/PussyPassDenied01/02/20 02:18 PM
3

I only know about four states and the UCCJEA. The states all differed from one another and the UCCJEA did not help me in the slightest with chasing down child support across state lines. All of the states had very specific guidelines for how to write up judgements and rules for how to proceed with figuring out things like how much support to pay, how much visitation to allow, etc. We consistently varied from these guidelines, blew past timelines, were told to figure things out on our own. They i…
/r/PussyPassDenied01/02/20 02:16 PM
1

I know what the law says and I've seen it be relatively impartial. I've also seen judges factor this into physical custody determinations. I'm also older than a lot of Redditors so maybe it's changed more in the 16 years since my divorce.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/02/20 02:08 PM
1

If you say so. Lot of experiences myself and others have gone through say otherwise though.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/02/20 01:58 PM
2

It can help sway an opinion on physical custody for sure.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/02/20 01:00 PM
1

If they were just sleeping it's not revenge porn. Could it have run afoul of other laws? Yes (except him giving it to his lawyer)
/r/PussyPassDenied01/02/20 12:58 PM
8

It's not about punishment, it's about helping to decide who has physical custody. An affair is evidence that, eh, maybe the other parent would be better for having more time with the child(ren).
/r/PussyPassDenied01/02/20 12:56 PM
1

I have no love for the guy, but this is a stretch: "Scott’s veto was unfair, anti-family, and anti-small-business." How the hell is it anti-family or anti-small biz?
/r/MensRights07/02/17 05:29 AM
69

I think it's magnificent that he took in his ex-wife's daughter with another man so that she can be with her sisters. That is the kind of compassion we can all hope to find in ourselves.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 11:09 AM
12

This looks like a personal lament, not a critique of fathers or men in general. In fact he speaks about wanting to be a good dad himself.
/r/MensRights29/11/13 10:51 PM
6

Transmisogyny is such a fucked up made-up word.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 07:44 PM
10

A pretend bogeyman that people construct and point to and say "Look at that, it represents you, so you must be 'X' " when it's them that brought it up in the first place. I'm into men's rights because of the fucked up family law situation in this country. If I'm having an argument with a feminist and they say "You're a dumb MRA, you think affirmative action sucks and here's why you're wrong!" well that's a straw man, because my reason for following men's rights has nothing to do with affirmative…
/r/MensRights24/10/12 12:10 AM
-3

Holy shit -- was it really Adrien Chen? Has that been confirmed? What a fucking beta.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 05:05 AM
2

Also, from now on, YouTube this shit. It worked for that judge's daughter, after all. Make sure you have not only the video evidence, but make sure that you can show that there is a pattern.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 03:22 PM
1

You dont want to hear this, but you need evidence of wrongdoing, not evidence of being a shitty parent. Judges WILL NOT grant full custody off the bat to a dad without hard evidence of drug use, DUIs, lascivious behavior around the child, etc. A mom is still a mom even if she is shitty. So, for starters, fight for equal time, and make sure your brother has a court order that unrelated men arent allowed overnights when she has the kid. If you want dirt, have a PI document that shes breaking this …
/r/MensRights31/07/12 01:04 PM
6

Seriously. No warrant, no entrance.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 06:10 PM
2

Hi! I know a lot about father's rights in Florida, which has the jurisdiction for my case. Florida and federal law, on the books, is very fair to both parents -- it's how the police and lawyers interpret it that's not. Still! The kid wasn't with his dad? Lacking a formal agreement (which would codify what parts of the week are mother's time and which parts are father's time), the mother can do exactly this; it might even be kidnapping if you don't let the mother have her kid and there's no forma…
/r/MensRights30/07/12 06:05 PM
3

3) This doesn't hold water if there are kids involved -- in some states you need a member of the "division of children and families" there to authorize it, but in other states the police have a right to enter your home for the "welfare of the child". Obviously this is meant only in cases of child abuse, but I guarantee you that with the mother right there with him, he'd rather you try and charge him for trespass than have potential liability from the mother suing his ass.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 06:01 PM
3

How is this related to Men's Rights? Some judge should have recused herself from a lawsuit between NOW and anti-abortion activists. How the fuck does that matter to me?
/r/MensRights26/03/12 08:41 PM
0

I think it's a perfectly fine tongue-in-cheek article, but let's be honest. She starts out her classification with this: "At 41, he's approaching middle age..." So she's immediately proving herself to be retarded if she can't admit that middle age begins at 35 or 40. I'm assuming this point of view is a necessity for those women who assume that 40 and childless is a perfect time for a woman to settle down and is amazed that there aren't any decent 40 and childless men just looking to shack up wi…
/r/MensRights23/02/12 06:58 PM
19

Yeah, you've gotta go to HR. You may not be the only person who's reported her, so you may be helping to provide a pattern of abuse. In addition, if you're the first person to bring this to HR, you will be helping a FUTURE employee establish a pattern of abuse. In the US most everything that goes to HR is confidential. I wouldn't hesitate, starting with the ass grabbing, to go to HR.
/r/MensRights19/12/11 06:06 PM
11

They can't enter your home without a warrant, but if they have an arrest warrant and they see you, they are allowed to execute the warrant in any fashion they need. I don't know about the entire "refuse to identify themselves" aspect, but still -- he admitted he knew he had a warrant out. The rest is academic, because the details of this are perfectly clear and legal.
/r/MensRights08/12/11 04:44 PM
17

How about -- never trust a woman to look after the birth control AT ALL?
/r/MensRights30/11/11 02:16 PM
0

Insight of the day. Great perspective.
/r/MensRights22/11/11 04:45 PM
2

Keep in mind that in many countries "guilty unless proven innocent" is indeed the legal standard. This is America, and "innocent until proven guilty" has " in a court of law" appended to it. Keep that in mind as well. Having said all that, I'm not thrilled with the direction that this is taking. I can't fathom how these rules achieve anything resembling fair. But I'm also aware of the fact that this is a completely different standard than the judiciary.
/r/MensRights17/11/11 06:12 PM
7

So...you're saying the men's rights movement has been hijacked, like the gun rights movement, by a bunch of right-wing reactionaries? Sounds about right.
/r/MensRights06/11/11 02:20 PM
3

On this topic, sorry you're getting so flamed. If you think about the demographics of reddit (30s, single, male, etc.) this is about what one should expect. As a mid-30s married father, my biggest fear is that the courts are going to decide in favor of my ex, even though she left me and my daughter when my daughter was 14 months old and moved halfway across the country. She consistently uses the idea of the courts against me, calling for ME to pay HER child support, calling for my daughter to li…
/r/MensRights02/11/11 06:45 PM
8

1) Lost interest at: "Facts like democrats play on the ignorance and feelings of well intentioned people as well as fan the flames of jealously and merely bribe people to vote for them with other people's money. These are facts. Not opinions." 2) And on his homepage, the first line of his 10/10/2011 article: "Anybody who is intellectually honest knows the real racists in the country are liberals and leftists." Fantastic find Edit: Forgot to add my second numeral. If you're going to have 1, you a…
/r/MensRights10/10/11 07:38 PM
5

This is 100% me. I've been scared for years, and got pushed over the edge when she pulled some serious bullshit last year. Now I need the courts to step in because she'll never contribute. I've had our daughter for almost a decade with no support. We've been trying to come to an agreement, but she keeps on changing what she wants at the end so it's been impossible.
/r/MensRights29/06/11 04:47 PM
1

Fault shouldn't play a role in divorce proceedings. Fault currently doesn't play much of a role in proceedings, but it can definitely color them, because the outcome is so subjective. I'm personally of the opinion that adultery should definitely be a cause of action, but that's just me. Also, if one spouse is adamant about the divorce, it's "their decision", and I also opine that that should be taken into account when it comes time to award alimony (if any is awarded). So no recourse when the no…
/r/MensRights18/04/11 02:46 PM
-1

Well, 25k a year is enough to pay for the most basic of needs, provide a roof over ones head and get started again. To be clear, I'm specifically talking about the cases where it's pretty clearly the higher-earning spouse either did something wrong, leading to a divorce, or is otherwise the main cause of action in the divorce proceedings. In these circumstances, it's not fair that one spouse has to go from a middle class lifestyle to "the most basic of needs". Here, let's look at it another way.…
/r/MensRights18/04/11 02:07 PM
1

And it varies wildly from state to state, like a lot of divorce and family law. Some states basically say that if you're not married for x amount of time, alimony doesn't come into play (child support is enough). But the assumption in those states is that if you're married long enough, the marriage has definitely affected the earning potential of the lesser-earning spouse.
/r/MensRights18/04/11 01:53 PM
-1

If you stop giving the benefits of marriage to your spouse, you should stop receiving any benefits from marriage. But what if my children are grown and stable? One of the benefits to my marriage is that my children are well looked after. And I still have my career and the promotions I've earned that I probably wouldn't have been able to earn if I didn't get an opportunity to work my ass off. To wit: I will still have the benefits I gained from marriage if I am no longer married. Essentially its …
/r/MensRights18/04/11 01:51 PM
3

A lot of women stay home with the kids or only work part time specifically so that the father can focus on his career. My wife does exactly that, keeps the house clean, picks up my dry cleaning, etc. As a result, she doesnt have a career. If we were to get a divorce over something I did, her lifestyle would drastically alter through no fault of her own. In cases such as that, i can envision alimony as being a part of the final settlement.
/r/MensRights18/04/11 12:04 PM
2

Very good point, and very reasonable course of action.
/r/MensRights30/03/11 07:31 PM
-1

If that's your idea of taking control of the situation, so be it. It's not mine. As a straw man for you to knock down, it serves well. The more I think about it, the more aggravated I get that the cops came and interrogated his kid. But I don't see a problem with the older couple being suspicious nor with the cops checking out the situation as it occurred. Going to the dude's house without probable cause busts me up.
/r/MensRights30/03/11 04:51 PM
-1

It depends. I just said that geocachers freak people out because geocaching itself appears kind of suspicious. Couple that with an adult taking a child off into the woods? I MIGHT have a problem with a woman in the same circumstances.
/r/MensRights30/03/11 04:48 PM
-7

It's well known to geocachers that "muggles" might have problems with people tromping through property, hiding things that look like pipe bombs, etc. In this case, they got uncomfortable because a grown man was taking an 8 year old off into the woods. I think the dad is an idiot for not heading this off at the pass. Let me pause a minute and say that the older couple were shits about it and they should have spoken up. Anyway, the dad, who admittedly noticed the couple acting strangely, should ha…
/r/MensRights30/03/11 01:12 PM
1

And you level accusations without backing them up.
/r/MensRights30/03/11 12:42 PM
1

I think that parents should be on the hook except in the case of subterfuge. I also think that if a parent has met their child support commitments, the custodial parent is on the hook to provide access. Sperm donors shouldn't have to pay child support, though...and that's relevant to a few links that have been posted lately. If a man has fathered a child via irresponsible sexual intercourse, so fucking what, they're still on the hook, though.
/r/MensRights29/03/11 09:11 PM
2

My ex-wife is a non-custodial parent that pays no child support (though i'm trying to rectify that) and makes about $30,000. Caveats: She's remarried, and he makes a "meh" living as well. I guess they make around $60-70K a year in a cheap southern state. Since our divorce she went to school to get a bachelors AND a master's degree She has an iPhone and data plan She has sued me for custody twice in two different states I have to pay for her legal bills even though I have custody. She can just up…
/r/MensRights29/03/11 08:14 PM
1

When I see this kind of new article I always wonder how they can tell that the woman is making it up. Do they get her to crack or something?
/r/MensRights25/02/11 06:19 PM
9

I haven't read the previous article, but there's nothing wrong with this one. It's light on substance, but the fact that there are an increasing number of relationships where the woman earns more than the man is a valid area of study and comment.
/r/MensRights18/02/11 08:39 PM
18

Here's what you can expect: If you're the father, you're on the hook for child support. The end. If you want any rights whatsoever, you need to pay the child support. You have to have evidence that you haven't "abandoned the child" and that means visitation, child support, the works. If you don't want any rights whatsoever (and you're an idiot if that's the case), you don't have to have any visitation, you can sign away all of your rights to the mother, BUT YOU STILL HAVE TO PAY THE SAME AMOUNT …
/r/MensRights16/02/11 02:44 PM
0

"...find that no matter what the rate of violence or who initiates the violence, women are 7 to 10 times more likely to be injured in acts of intimate violence than are men." So...no real comment on whether or not women are as likely or more likely to be abusive, just that more women are injured. Awesome refutation there, Lou.
/r/MensRights15/02/11 09:18 PM
6

As an incredibly liberal type, let me just say that I blame liberals for this. I lived in Florida when I was a single tattooed father of a 2-4 year old girl. We NEVER had any problems. In fact, after I got remarried, I had the biological mother call the police and have a sheriff's deputy sent to her day care with a social worker to "interview" her without me. I was a nervous wreck, but about 5 minutes after the interview started the social worker came out shaking her head, and her and the deputy…
/r/MensRights07/02/11 01:42 PM
1

I can't tell if you're agreeing or disagreeing with me. I'm definitely not disagreeing with this most recent post, but I am trying to put a fine point on the idea that we don't need to understand everybody's actions for everything, and that we can't be overly concerned with this fact. Occasionally our actions will have a detrimental effect on others, and empathy allows us to understand that our actions may be detrimental, but it may very well be the right thing to move forward with those actions…
/r/MensRights02/02/11 09:57 PM
1

Some thoughts. You don't need to OVER emphasize things, but you need to set some kind of expectation. Kids don't know their own goals or what they can achieve, it's up to parents to set the bar high and help their kids to get over it. Empathy is good, but they can't constantly compare themselves to others. They need to figure out a way to chart their own course through life instead of relying on others to do it for them. The emotional stability part is dead on. Stability and maintaining an even …
/r/MensRights02/02/11 04:32 PM
3

I have two daughters. A few nebulous thoughts: first and foremost, set a good example. be the ideal of what a good man should be so that they can recognize it in the future. teach them that they need to be independent and that they need to learn to count on themselves instead of other people. teach them to find self-worth, instead of valuing themselves as others would value them. this is the most nebulous piece of advice of all, but encapsulates the fact that they need to not create a self image…
/r/MensRights02/02/11 04:29 PM
1

Whoppie Goldberg? Seriously, the reading level of this article is worse than K.
/r/MensRights01/02/11 07:05 PM
10

I live about 40 minutes from Yale in a pretty upscale part of Connecticut. If I don't live near Amy Chau, then I live near mothers who are probably a lot like her. I would like to dispute point #1. The mothers I know of that remind me of Amy Chau have nannies whether they work or not (and they probably don't). She probably worked her ass off, good on her, and had a nanny to take care of the kids except when Ms. Chau (I won't use "Mrs", because Chau is probably not "Jed's" last name. Then again, …
/r/MensRights10/01/11 04:23 PM
1

Here's the best way this can go down if you don't have an agreement: You both claim them as dependents The IRS doesn't notice. This will not happen. Here is what WILL happen: You both claim them as dependents. You both receive notice that you have both claimed them as dependents. She wins, because they're living with her and that's the biggest way to determine who gets to claim them as a dependent barring a written agreement. You lawyer up and get in writing how the dependencies go. Notice I sai…
/r/MensRights06/01/11 02:15 PM
1

Jeez, DZ.
/r/MensRights03/01/11 09:43 PM
1

Yup. PM me.
/r/MensRights30/12/10 09:36 PM
1

Completely Valid. I just call them idiots.
/r/MensRights30/12/10 03:20 PM
3

males taking full advantage of all of our “liberation” by enjoying what can amount to the lack of sustained boundaries by other women. Bingo. One thing that always bothered me about feminism is that too many "feminists" want to make sure that being equal to men sexually means actively sleeping around.
/r/MensRights30/12/10 01:59 PM
0

Pragmatically marriage provides for continuity in the case of accidents, such that the public at large is provided an easy to reference legal framework in which to enact whatever it is needs to be enacted to respond to said accident. Property rights, visitation, debt continuance, etc. In addition, it's also a public way to say "hey, I love somebody...word" Plus, shame (and its sister emotion guilt) have a place in society and civilization. They are important tools to uphold those morals you thin…
/r/MensRights28/12/10 07:55 PM
-4

Listen, this comic is obviously only telling one side of the story. It certainly makes the mom out to be the bad guy, but she's got a house and he's in a homeless shelter. Was the kid with the mom in the car, at the end? If so, who fucking cares where they went? Man the fuck up and enjoy Christmas with your kid, you douche.
/r/MensRights28/12/10 02:16 PM
2

Dude you are FINE. Think like youre their uncle (not the creepy one), and then prolly take an itsy step back from that.
/r/MensRights23/12/10 10:35 PM
5

I've got a 9 year old daughter at home. I'm happy and unparanoid to walk with her holding hands, picking her up, etc. I'm her dad, for crissakes. This behavior is familiar, as we are family. You are not these little girls' family, so as long as you remember your boundaries, there's no reason to be paranoid. So, don't pick them up for no reason. If they fall down, no sweat. If they want a better view at a concert, no sweat. But if I choose to pick up my girls (I have a 4 year old as well) then I …
/r/MensRights23/12/10 03:26 PM
1

Isn't the broader question "Has feminism become something to oppose?" The core tenants of equality, nobody has a problem with those. But I think it's dangerous to attack the idea of "feminism". One must come up with a label to identify what it is you're opposing, and I can't see "feminism" as being that label.
/r/MensRights22/12/10 02:19 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter