TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

tavaman2 Archive

View 0 posts and 7 comments by tavaman2 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

And she didn’t say she’s never work with male directors, she said she doesn’t want to film nude or sex scenes unless it’s with a woman director. Also, even if someone said they’d never work with any male or female director across the board, while that attitude is awful, it doesn’t violate the rights of the directors. The directors don’t have a right to work with any particular actor. Like a private club can exclude men or women...it might be wrong in some cases, but it’s perfectly legal and with…
/r/MensRights26/01/21 10:55 PM
0

Seems like you just want to argue without trying to address the real points...Being denied access to a public establishment is different than an actor choosing which projects to take. An actor could say “I’m only going to work with Quentin Tarantino and nobody else” and that’s fine. They can choose whatever projects they want. You can’t force someone to work...
/r/MensRights26/01/21 07:11 PM
1

No actually, in the sense that for discrimination, the discriminated party has a right that was violated. But no director has a right to film a nude sex scene with any actor. The actor has to agree. If your actress daughter came home and said “you know dad, I’ve had some bad experiences with male directors and intimate scenes, I don’t want to do that anymore” you wouldn’t say “well too bad, you better still do them with men if you plan to do them with women.” It’s a personal choice by the actor.…
/r/MensRights26/01/21 10:06 AM
1

Agree if it was truly “who you will work with.” But it’s about acting nude and doing intimate scenes. That’s a personal choice and involves all kinds of aspects of personal comfort. If she’s not permitted to have her position, the alternative is “she should do nude scenes with male directors even if she’s not comfortable.” That’s a strange position. I don’t think her reasoning makes sense here, but that’s beside the point. Anyway, think what you will. It’s not a big deal.
/r/MensRights26/01/21 04:23 AM
2

It seems like you’re actively trying to misstate what I’m saying. Not sure why. You keep saying “discrimination” but my point is, sometimes making distinctions based on gender is okay, and different from making distinctions on race. Do you think separate bathrooms is “discrimination”? Is it ever okay to treat men and women differently?
/r/MensRights26/01/21 03:39 AM
3

Put it a different way: do you think she should be willing to get nude and act in intimate scenes with all actors and directors, or she should do none at all? She shouldn’t get any opinion on what she’s comfortable with unless it’s totally egalitarian and equal? I mean, I don’t care for the “male gaze” comment but this seems more like when people have a preference for a doctor’s gender for intimate medical needs. It’s the person’s choice and their reasoning isn’t for anyone else to have a say in…
/r/MensRights25/01/21 11:04 PM
-2

We separate locker rooms and bathrooms by gender but not by race. Gender is relevant here while race is not valid as a separating factor. Yes, if she refused to work with directors of a certain race, it would be discriminatory. I don’t think the analogy really works...
/r/MensRights25/01/21 07:04 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter