TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

tavishthomas Archive

View 0 posts and 17 comments by tavishthomas on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

your opinion does not make a point less valid if the point is true.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 06:39 PM
1

it is when the question pertains to it. rhetorical questions used as an answer are basically a way of saying "it's so obvious that I'll phrase it as a question and everyone will come to the same answer if they possess a brain." it's one of those semi sarcastic quirks many languages share in common.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 04:10 PM
2

I don't trust studies to numerically explain empathy. empathy as a subject is just too subjective for me to believe they can set a reliable bar for testing.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 08:45 AM
1

that's kinky. I guess you could insert really tiny nipples. if you really force it. or as I learned from hentai in the 5th grade, a railspike.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 08:30 AM
2

but if he didn't do it, he isn't a liability. the accuser committed libel is what happened. that's an actual crime.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 08:26 AM
1

so I just have to get so fucking plastered that I go into a coma and I get a victim card? neat.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 08:25 AM
1

you didn't read into the implication properly. being accused ruins you socially. there are no repercussions for the accuser. if you get sent to jail you will likely be actually raped, literally lose years of your life inside concrete walls, and statistically will not get back on your feat even if you got a short sentence (which you won't get. have fun getting raped for a decade.) so yeah, I'd personally choose getting abused and having my agency temporarily taken away once rather than being sent…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 08:20 AM
2

mainly because the arguments it can be used against actually do make it a trump card. it's a good honest question to ask in the context of gender reform.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 08:15 AM
1

cultural icons are slightly different than anecdotes, even if they share similar origins in rumors and events that got blown out of proportion.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/15 10:29 PM
1

it's called the "women are wonderful bias." they really could have named it better, but it is a legitimately researched topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/15 10:23 PM
1

my 2 cents on the subject, you can choose to sleep around and if you're safe that's fine, but people will form opinions. you can't control your height unless you go through some drastic and illegal (for safety) surgeries. but regardless of your height being the fault of genetics, you will still have people forming opinions about your worth. to add to that though, why not compare the same thing rather than two things with an obvious and loaded answer?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/15 10:10 PM
1

so you have an anecdote? how quaint. there are plenty of studies debunking the empathy gap and if you wanna get cultural about it, please explain why such a huge number of empathy based paragons(Gandhi for example) in religion, creed, and myth are male. trying to objectively state one gender has a monopoly on empathy, which is a subjective bias in response to a situation, is just absurd.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/15 10:07 PM
1

there's a difference between being treated sweetly and being hit on by a cougar and not knowing how to react so you let her pass while you are sort of dumbfounded.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/15 09:18 PM
1

it generally is seen as unacceptable in most areas of the world that have joined the 21st century. intimidation is usually a defense tactic for the everyday person, not a coercion tactic.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/15 09:15 PM
1

the fact you actually believe women have more empathy shows how twisted your worldview is.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/15 09:12 PM
2

easy system would be a seperate child support account. it should cover the basics(a part of food, school, etc.) and a small allowance. the account can be accessed by both parents and there can be no cash withdrawals(the spending has to be directly tracked). if any activity is suspicious, either party can take these records and file suit. if you're obscenely rich you can just give your child their own account and cancel it if the ex is abusing or stealing from it.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 01:55 AM
1

only a month for that level of slander? I'd say 5-10 years. make it ruin their life just as much as it could ruin the accused.
/r/PussyPass11/03/15 01:11 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter