TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

taytrovert Archive

View 0 posts and 91 comments by taytrovert on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
16

This is why I hate stooping down to their level. It always turns into a victim Olympics. Can’t even have a productive conversation with those losers.
/r/AntiFeminists06/04/22 03:51 AM
7

It's their fault. They want traditional chivalrous men while not being traditional virtuous women.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 02:26 AM
3

Okay time for the Vagina Falcon next up on Skank Wars in a galaxy far far away.
/r/MensRights05/03/22 04:17 AM
2

Not rape. Theft/fraud maybe, but not rape. Women are so used to being able to leverage their sexuality for resources/compliance from simps. Unless they're fucking a guy they are actually crazy about, they are used to feeling like they didn't get what they wanted out the deal and feeling regretful; thus, feeling like their sexually has been stolen from them as if they were actually raped.
/r/MensRights05/03/22 01:35 AM
6

Yeah you’ll lose half your shit if you don’t😂 Jokes aside I agree with you, but in a marriage, men are in an unnatural position of submission. I believe that forces men to become the very thing that’ll make their woman lose respect for him over time because you’re a push over, incapable of independent thought, no longer a leader.
/r/AntiFeminists01/03/22 07:26 AM
9

Happy wife, Happy life, right? Fuck that. Waste of time. These women nowadays are more than happy to have pre marital sex and bear children out of wedlock. Marriage isn't worth the risk anymore.
/r/AntiFeminists01/03/22 07:04 AM
20

Those grown ass men who can’t make a decision for themselves and goes “let me go ask my wife” at literally every little thing.
/r/AntiFeminists01/03/22 06:23 AM
7

Where you a feminist at one point? If so, what made you become anti feminist?
/r/AntiFeminists28/02/22 10:04 AM
46

Women empower themselves by not needing men, while simultaneously having the option to need them when its convenient. Everything is about convenience and being able to put yourself in a favorable position no matter what...at the expense of the very men you claim you don't need/ are your oppressors. Women refuse to acknowledge how privileged they are because it doesn't make them feel good about themselves, yet, won't hesitate to use that privilege and pretend like they aren't strong and independe…
/r/MensRights26/02/22 09:16 PM
6

Your daughter is simply capable of independent thought.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 06:26 PM
4

The top 10-20% of men will continue doing whatever they want and be the most desired in the long run. Everybody else will have to come to terms that the girl they really like is most likely chasing a top guy, but settling for you for security; while, simultaneously getting railed by a bum that she finds sexually arousing. The thing is, the average guy will NOT be capable for having multiple wives/girlfriends. All while the average girl is taking advantage of multiple men, while dreaming of a top…
/r/MensRights21/02/22 10:51 PM
41

They've got men in the friend zone waiting for his chance to "communicate" his whole life to her. Meanwhile they're getting railed by men they claim is doing everything wrong. This is why you don't take dating advice from women.
/r/TheRedPill21/02/22 08:23 PM
7

Yes there is. Biology. Women are 80% of the consumer base and hold majority of national debt. Women are natural consumers and resource extractors. Women would much rather benefit from a producer, than make the sacrifices to be one.
/r/TheRedPill20/02/22 08:16 AM
6

Great read. I'm going to copy this and re read frequently. Being able to articulate these points with sources may bear fruit in future discussions. Good job.
/r/TheRedPill20/02/22 07:48 AM
5

Huh?. Mods get this guy outta here😂
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 10:35 PM
0

I never said it was a waste of time draft women. I actually said they should for equality purposes.
/r/MensRights17/02/22 09:40 AM
3

Oh no I’m not saying that at all. Majority of rape victims are male inmates after all. I’m just saying that reality will be a lot worse for women. A lot of women consider rape as the worst possible thing that could happen to them.
/r/MensRights17/02/22 08:18 AM
11

Exactly why I can’t respect them. They want all the benefits of feminism and traditionalism when it’s convenient. One day they’re strong and independent. The next day they’re victims. They brag about how much men are now useless to them, yet they complain about men not being chivalrous. They want to be seen and respected as equals, but treated special at the same time. I’m glad women got their rights and everything, but now they’re just wasting everyone’s time.
/r/MensRights17/02/22 06:59 AM
-12

For the sake of equality(if equality even actually matters to these people) sure women should be drafted. I personally think it’s a waste of time to have women engage in physical combat with men. Imagine a woman as a prisoner of war. She would be violated to the upmost degree. Literally a 300 soldier gang bang waiting to happen. I wouldn’t want that for any woman.
/r/MensRights17/02/22 06:31 AM
1

No, I don’t know if that man thought he was being taken advantage of, or was arguing that. I don’t believe he was being hostile. If he respectfully said no, he was being neutral. Didn’t get too involved. Unless he lashed out or said no in a disrespectful tone, then him telling her no, wasn’t an hostile act. Rude, sure. Hostile? We would’ve had to been there to tell. Unless there was some animosity we weren’t told, or the man didn’t express, I don’t believe a stranger not helping you is hostility…
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 04:41 AM
1

Okay, I see what's going on. Essentially, we agree that the right thing to do is what you should do, obviously. I also agree that what he did, or didn't do, was indeed objectively rude. I am not arguing against that. I understand how the world should be, but I also understand how the world really works. Personally, I don't think you should feel entitled to people's kindness because you will be very disappointed at even a simple "no". There are bad people and good people. Nothing about this life,…
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 03:14 AM
1

I’m not saying what he did was the polite thing to do at all. It was your word choice that got my attention. You said she was “disrespected” and “brutally” rejected by the guy (even after having a plethora of reasons why he didn’t) when there’s people at the store who literally get paid to help customers that she should’ve asked. Did he do the right thing? Probably not. Did he do the wrong thing? Probably not. If this was a 5’2 guy complaining about how embarrassed he was because people don’t he…
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 02:10 AM
1

All she said was he said no. I would assume he didn’t curse her out. He probably just said nah and went on with his day
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 01:38 AM
1

Gotcha. I believe I am looking at this through a more masculine lens, I can’t relate to being humiliated because a stranger in public didn’t want to help me and I’m probably projecting that onto the lady in the post. Also, someone who doesn’t want to do you a favor (something they literally don’t have to do and have to go out of their way to do it) isn’t disrespect. It was his choice. His body his choice.
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 01:37 AM
1

That’s the problem. I never actually said this specific woman in the post was a feminist. All I said was that women who are used to doing everything themselves, and takes pride in that(doesn’t make them a feminist) aren’t used to having to ask men for help. So when that man says no, she is left confused. The ACTUAL feminist are the ones I said that contributed to ruining chivalry. I understand the implications of these words and I put them where they are on purpose. Please don’t assume things an…
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 01:31 AM
1

Yes, and I am saying that understanding why that man said no and that it was possibly not motivated by feminism is something that woman should ALSO understand. She probably felt embarrassed because why would anyone tell a woman no about something that simple. Why get humiliated? Just go ask someone else. They’re probably saying he’s a misogynist loser in her comments, but for all the reasons you stated, he very well could not be.
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 01:17 AM
2

Tell that to the woman who felt so humiliated because a stranger didn’t think it was worth his time to help her.
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 01:10 AM
2

What an astute observation. We’ve entered a space where the feminists who would think a man helping them reach something high is demeaning, ruined it for the women who would love a tall, handsome man to help them in public. You’re watching chivalry be killed before your very eyes.
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 12:57 AM
43

lmao we could go to war right now and even the most hardcore feminist would rather be at home growing food and making boots. literally a joke.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 10:43 PM
10

Women want the benefits of feminism and traditionalism when convenient. They'll brag all day about their degrees and how independent of men they are; yet, still want men to be chivalrous and cater to them as if they are special. Make up your mind. Either you need us or you don't. You can't be privileged and oppressed simultaneously. Sorry.
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 10:42 PM
6

some women brag all day about not needing a man and the moment they need him, but he doesn't help, she's gets confused asf
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 05:59 PM
1

My apologies I misunderstood the tone. I thought it was more sentimental instead of an epiphany
/r/MensRights13/02/22 09:42 PM
8

Not judging your English. You were probably meaning ice cream parlor. The word "parlor" could also be used for a restaurant that only sells pizza: Pizza Parlor.
/r/MensRights13/02/22 11:20 AM
6

Exactly women push men to the edge and get surprised when he finally snaps.
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 10:01 AM
1

Yes, I agree 100%. But for guys like OP they have a harder time dealing with that. That’s why I said it was unfortunate.
/r/MensRights13/02/22 10:00 AM
23

That's the uncomfortable truth man. Unfortunately, the only beings that are loved unconditionally are children and pets. The only person who would love a man unconditionally is his mother. The only man who will love a woman 100% without expecting something in return is her father. That's why a two parent household is so important to children both boys and girls. You gotta find purpose in life and come to terms that the more useful you are to people, the more they will value you as a man.
/r/MensRights13/02/22 06:38 AM
8

lol it's a utter waste of time for the average man to fight an average woman. Unless... That woman believes that she is in her right to physically harm a man and he's not allowed to defend himself. That logic directly contradicts a lot of feminist talking points. "Men and women are the same." "Feminism is about equality." Women are completely fine with abuse, as long as they are not on the receiving end of it. Women are completely fine with a lot of the fucked up things in this world... as long …
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 04:47 AM
9

Women aren't foreign to suffering, it's just that their suffering isn't the result of any system/structure. Western women's suffering is self-perpetual. Due to lack of accountability, men will get blamed for women's problems, while men's problems are simultaneously ignored.
/r/MensRights13/02/22 03:57 AM
6

lmao so they cure "deeply rooted misogyny" with deeply rooted misandry? These women are clowns.
/r/AntiFeminists10/02/22 08:10 PM
50

lmao go deeper and ask them who's raising those very men
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 03:44 PM
16

Being a woman of virtue and chastity is the only way men would feel compelled to be chivalrous without getting taken advantage of. Nowadays you’ll just end up getting clowned in a group chat and feeding a woman’s ego if you partake in this behavior. It’s that last part of this picture “worthy of respect.” Worthy. Not entitled.
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 03:53 AM
7

Like what exactly
/r/AntiFeminists02/02/22 07:08 AM
5

also the term mansplaining. their goal is to literally silence men even if they are speaking truth.
/r/MensRights09/12/21 03:57 AM
81

everyone here is just going to give you the politically correct answer. no one here is going to actually acknowledge the fact that women only hit men because they know they can get away with it without being beaten to a pulp. even in situations where a guy is bullied by a girl. if he defends himself, he is instantly the brute who beats women. feminism fails to actually fight for equality. all feminism does today is put down men in order for women to feel good about themselves.
/r/AntiFeminists09/12/21 03:45 AM
12

Women only have a problem with double standards that doesn’t benefit them. Also, women who have a problem with not being able to sleep around is probably only good for that purpose anyway. Shows a lot about a girls character who has no respect for herself.
/r/AntiFeminists04/12/21 04:31 PM
0

Ladies want to feel beautiful. Especially to the opposite gender. They go a post certain pics and wear certain clothes. Once they start guilt tripping it becomes everyone else's fault.
/r/AntiFeminists02/12/21 01:11 AM
6

Social constructs don’t adhere to reality. The feminism definition of patriarchy and the real definition are two different things. Feminists believe patriarchy to be a social structure in which men purposely dominate, oppress, and exploit women. Women seem to lack awareness of how the world really works and what roles were naturally put in place for them;thus, they feel like the world (men) is against them. When really nature was intended to be one way, but social constructs wants to go another.…
/r/AntiFeminists01/12/21 08:51 PM
9

My apologies. My point is patriarchy was never really “founded”. It was inevitable from the very beginning. It took strong men to protect villages, towns, etc. The patriarchy that women complain about is the only reason they are alive today. If we were to go to war today all the strong and independent woman will gladly watch all their white knights die in war to protect them. Only in modern times of peace is where the privileged can flip the script on their protectors because their life isn’t a …
/r/AntiFeminists01/12/21 08:03 PM
4

No. Nature is Nature. Survival of the fittest. Food chain. Natural selection. Just so happens that most male species’ biology is more fit for that reality.
/r/AntiFeminists01/12/21 07:25 PM
10

Put women on one side, men on the other. Who wins if that was a war? Exactly. There’s your patriarchy.
/r/AntiFeminists01/12/21 02:57 PM
14

lol plenty of men say the woman they marry is not that woman they divorce. All that “no I don’t want money” is heresay unless you tell your husband you want a prenup because you don’t want his money.
/r/MensRights29/11/21 07:23 AM
2

eh I'd call it more of a rape hysteria.
/r/MensRights29/11/21 02:33 AM
6

Strong and independent by day, weak and vulnerable by night. Their everyday life is literally a contradiction clusterfuck. No wonder they're so miserable.
/r/AntiFeminists28/11/21 10:48 PM
6

I want you guys to notice how whenever unflattering analogies , truths, lies, metaphors, etc are made against men, they never give or acknowledge a female equivalent. Its not about equality. It's blatant misandry.
/r/AntiFeminists28/11/21 10:45 PM
3

My concern isn’t if you agree with me or not. I could care less. You twist everything I say and assume the most radical thing possible. That’s why you can’t assess what I’m actually saying. Learn to listen.
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/21 07:25 AM
1

Do you tell your partner it’s a you problem whenever they try to express something to you that you don’t understand at first?
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/21 07:05 AM
2

The fact that you never asked for me to explain further/reiterate shows you never cared in the first place
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/21 07:04 AM
3

Wow. I just didn’t like being misinterpreted.
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/21 06:55 AM
3

It seems you’d rather insinuate rather then understand what I’m actually saying. You went from compassion and love, to teamwork, to a whole range of needs and wants. I was simply wondering what a woman who could provide for herself valued in a man. It’s not either or. It’s not black or white. It’s not transactional. My points were simplistic because you’re initial answer of “compassion and love” was simplistic and didn’t account for anything else two adults would go through in a relationship. So…
/r/AntiFeminists25/11/21 11:14 PM
3

When I asked you what you expected of a man, you only said companionship and love. That’s the only reason I asked about responsibilities as I thought they didn’t matter to you. I did not say relationships are transactional. You’re misinterpreting my points for whatever reason. I’m simply arguing on who is counting on who to do what. You say teamwork, but when roles are discussed you seem to be repulsed. Everyone on a team has their role
/r/AntiFeminists25/11/21 09:49 PM
3

A woman paying all the bills is definitely not an old fashioned idea. A bread winner paying all the bills may be old fashioned, but still common. I was simply trying to assess what a woman who can provide for herself wants from a man when it comes to providing. Love and butterflies is cool and all, just wanted to get to the point of responsibilities and who’s gonna keep this ship afloat lol. Yes, I agree that most average couples/marriages have an understanding of who’s paying for what in order …
/r/AntiFeminists25/11/21 09:13 PM
1

Gotcha. All the things that comes with loving your partner. This is assuming that the woman is paying all the bills? Companionship and love surely won’t keep the bill collectors away.
/r/AntiFeminists25/11/21 08:46 PM
1

Depends. A man’s ability to provide is a big deal for most women, even if she can do it all herself. What does that woman want from a man?
/r/AntiFeminists25/11/21 07:56 PM
1

As I see it, providing is more ambiguous and provisioning is specific. By being able to provide, you probably make a sufficient living, and can afford your family’s livelihood. That could mean literally anything. Provisions are specific goods, supplies, or even material wants that are deemed necessary. The ability to provide equals the ability to provision. However, you can’t provision if you can’t provide.
/r/AntiFeminists25/11/21 07:30 PM
3

Men don't pay women in sex. We pay women by providing, protecting, and provisioning.
/r/AntiFeminists25/11/21 07:15 PM
155

As a man, your ability to walk away from shitty deals is crucial. Be diligent. Be smart.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 01:21 AM
1

This is actually interesting and had been awhile since I’ve read this. I have one question though. Assuming you don’t particularly agree with this excerpt (correct me if I’m wrong), you agree that woman should be able to cause themselves bitter suffering and dispose of their children at the nearest clinic?
/r/AntiFeminists12/11/21 04:09 AM
1

In case I haven’t mentioned this already. Rape victims, and people with medical conditions should be allowed to have abortions. Recreational abortion is unjustifiable. It allows people (men and women) to act without considering the consequences of their actions. Also kills innocent children in the process. Men hunt animals for sport. Women want to have all the fun they want and get abortions for sport. The purpose of sex is reproduction. Don’t have sex if you wouldn’t bear that man’s child. Simp…
/r/AntiFeminists12/11/21 03:58 AM
1

I’ve grown tired of these paragraphs. Let’s get to the point. Abortions should be regulated to people who actually need them. Not to couples who have irresponsible sex and see their children as inconveniences preventing them from having more irresponsible sex. I am not trying to punish anyone. How is having sex with someone you love and having that person’s children a punishment? This life we live is not a Disney fairytale. Want to live happy and healthy? Pick a career you love. Pick a suitable …
/r/AntiFeminists12/11/21 03:28 AM
1

Equality is being able to seek the same education, thus, seeking the same occupations. Equality of opportunity is what everyone has. Not equality of outcome. I am black and seem to understand this concept just fine. You’re not entitled to anything. You can’t waltz into a corporate building and say “ less women are in leader positions than men, make me ceo or it’s inequality”. We now live in a world of quotas and “work diversity”. If you can’t make it in this environment, I don’t know what to tel…
/r/AntiFeminists12/11/21 03:06 AM
4

Can never take someone serious who wants to be equal, but simultaneously treated special.
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/21 12:20 PM
2

You believe that women being responsible is misogynistic? Thinking twice about engaging in an activity that could result in pregnancy is misogynistic? Strict policing of women’s bodies? Most guys won’t mind an attactive girl with her clothes off. Who’s policing your bodies? American woman don’t have to wear hijabs. Weaponizing childbirth? How is giving birth to your child being weaponized against you? Do women literally not think about the consequences of their actions. Yes, sex can lead to preg…
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/21 12:02 PM
1

My stance on male accountability should be clear to you by now. Men should be held, and hold themselves accountable for their actions. My argument, no matter how I word it, isn’t being understood correctly. You, as a woman, should not be having sex with irresponsible men who can’t take accountability for their actions. You can’t seriously justify this. You have sex with this man, but it’s solely the man’s fault that he had sex with you? What happened to “it takes two to tango?” You still haven’t…
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/21 11:09 AM
3

My apologies, I actually never FULLY gave my stance on abortion. I don’t believe it should be illegal. Abortion should be regulated to a small minority of individuals. Those who need it for medical reasons and rape victims. Everyone else is just looking for a cop out for being irresponsible. I am simply against abortion for recreational use, which are the majority of abortions.
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/21 10:25 AM
1

Women facing inequality in the work force? You do realize men make up over 90% of work related DEATHS right? Shit happens. I get it. You could be dying. But you’re not. Also, I love women. I just don’t think of women as innocent children. I agree with you that men should be held accountable. I really do. All I’m saying is that women are picking these men, yet somehow don’t consider picking these men a conscious choice that they themselves made. YOU seem to be the one dismissing that point. Yes, …
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/21 10:22 AM
2

Finally someone with some sense.
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/21 09:45 AM
1

What’s worse, controlling someone’s life , or ending someone’s life?
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/21 09:44 AM
2

I agree.
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/21 09:32 AM
2

Men don’t have any rights when it comes to abortion. If she gets pregnant, I literally have no say it what happens after. Then, I am the one held accountable and have to pay for either the abortion, or child support for the woman who knew I was not in a position to financially raise a child. Also, very convenient how it’s your body your choice, yet you want men to be held accountable? Your body, your choice, your responsibility. Laws are set up to help women keep men accountable anyway. Singles …
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/21 09:30 AM
2

1). This is Reddit, not a bar exam. My point still stands. 2). So women don’t have irresponsible sex? Simply a myth? Lack of accountability at its finest. Majority of abortions are actually due to bad timing, can’t afford to raise the child, or simply didn’t want to deal with a pregnancy. Condoms do break. Freak accidents do happen. I get it. Condoms have a 98% effectiveness rate. The Pill is in the 90s as will. The majority of abortions are not caused by contraceptives failing. They are caused …
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/21 09:02 AM
1

Emotions and politics aside. 1). Women should have sex with men who are capable. As man, I believe that to be common sense. Something I would teach my daughter. However, you can choose to have sex on the whim with any guy you want. Just be ready to drive across two states for that lovely abortion. 2). I agree with you that accidents do happen. Failing to plan is planning to fail. If you are truly in a position where you cannot afford an accident, why have sex at all? I know the answer: pleasure.…
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/21 03:39 AM
1

Yeah it’s tough that the majority ruin it for the minority.
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/21 03:13 AM
3

False equivalent. Women control who has access to sex, therefore, everything that comes with that is your fault. You can’t control the drunk drivers , the speeders, people without insurance, etc on the road. Sex simply cannot happen unless you spread your legs. Pregnancy is always a risk that comes with sex. The man, the birth control, etc are all factors that women must be diligent in ensuring quality. I find it very hard to justify having 100% responsibly over something, but yet finding 101 re…
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/21 03:03 AM
4

Women get the luxury of being pandered and protected from the guilt, shame, and consequences that come with making bad decisions. A woman is overweight? No girl you’re just big boned and everyone needs to love you for who you are. Instead of being held accountable and told to live a healthier life, you can just be entitled to peoples respect no matter what. A woman has sex irresponsibly, racks up her body count, then can’t get men to take her serious for marriage? No girl, he just can’t handle y…
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/21 02:43 AM
4

Women are dying either way. Some who didn’t get a chance at life, some who did. I do agree that for extreme medical reasons, abortion should be a legal procedure. However, an overwhelming about of abortions happen purely because the woman didn’t want the child. The woman wanted everything that came with going going to pound town, just not her child. As far as a child conceived via rape, abortion should then become an optional legal procedure for the victim. Most women advocating for abortion are…
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/21 02:23 AM
17

what in the lack of accountability is this??
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/21 01:27 AM
14

Lmao women really think they should have a "choice" to give their children the death penalty. It is your body your choice. Its your choice what you wear. Its your choice who you have sex with. Your "choice" is the ability to express your sexuality in the way you see fit, good or bad. What some women fail to realize, is with great power comes responsibility. Its your responsibility to pick a worthy partner to have sex with, and bearing that mans children. Just because you CHOOSE to have sex irres…
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/21 01:03 AM
1

Women have found themselves in an interesting predicament. They want all the benefits of feminism (making their own money, belittling men, sexual liberation, etc), but also the benefits of traditionalism (chivalry). Very confusing. They want to be equal, but treated special. They want to be independent, but still need a man that can provide. Crazy times.
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/21 06:12 PM
1

Those individuals are who you call exceptions to the rule. So sure, they should be excused from the harsh realities of this life.
/r/MensRights18/10/21 03:25 AM
8

Lmao body shaming is literally just a social convention that doesn’t allow unhealthy individuals to be held accountable for their poor decisions. Same concept with slut shaming. As a man, you cannot justify having unhealthy habits by believing in the protection of “no body shaming.” The world won’t take a fat, lazy man serious at all. Plain and simple. No one will love you “just the way you are”. That’s why about 70% of the homeless population is men. You want love? You want respect? Get off you…
/r/MensRights17/10/21 05:36 AM
42

Lmao no the best part is when we find a girl unattractive whom of which we wouldn’t actually have sex with “he must be gay”
/r/MensRights12/09/21 10:55 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter