TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

teapot_pot_of_tea Archive

View 2 posts and 77 comments by teapot_pot_of_tea on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

Question For Redpillteapot_pot_of_tea/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/14 09:43 AM
4

teapot_pot_of_tea/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/14 02:03 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-4

Lol I'm a guy. Calm down rage machine.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/11/14 11:56 PM
-9

Calm down lol
/r/PussyPassDenied26/11/14 11:28 PM
-7

LOL brilliant. How old are you?
/r/PussyPassDenied26/11/14 10:38 PM
-10

Do you really think he was legitimately threatened by that girl.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/11/14 10:28 PM
-5

You are a normal person in a subreddit full of angry manchildren. Escape while you can!
/r/PussyPassDenied26/11/14 10:25 PM
-9

TIL being gently pushed is a threat
/r/PussyPassDenied26/11/14 10:16 PM
1

Using other people's opinions as evidence isn't the same as other people's opinions motivating your actions.
/r/TheRedPill28/08/14 06:29 PM
1

When did I use other people's opinions as a motive for my actions?
/r/TheRedPill28/08/14 06:12 PM
0

Just voicing my opinion bro, whether it's proof or not is up to whoever listens to it.
/r/TheRedPill28/08/14 03:11 PM
4

Haha you're welcome. Good debating. Have a good one mate
/r/TheRedPill28/08/14 02:59 PM
1

Of course I agree that some generalisations can be made. However what I'm trying to say is that a few of the generalisations made in OP's post are not very accurate.
/r/TheRedPill28/08/14 02:45 PM
0

It may be anecdotal but i'm not here to prove or disprove anything. I'm just relaying my experiences and opinions on this specific subject. Unlike you guys I'm not here to try and find the exact science to seducing women because I don't have trouble with it. I'm not here to point out flaws in modern day feminism because I'm not interested in feminism like you guys are. I'm not here to hate on women because I don't hate women. I just came to relate my opinion on why OP's argument could be better …
/r/TheRedPill28/08/14 02:35 PM
1

That's not what i'm saying. My argument was that OP's argument is based on the assumption that everybody finds the same things attractive and unattractive as he does. This is not a solid basis for an argument.
/r/TheRedPill28/08/14 02:22 PM
1

Ah I see. you see that is not attractive to me. I prefer a girl who considers me her equal. who admires and respects me but does not consider me the 'captain' of the relationship. That dynamic feels very weird to me.
/r/TheRedPill28/08/14 02:10 PM
-1

So you mean to tell me you like women who constantly challenge you, give you shit, and essentially make life more difficult to navigate for you? Well of course I don't like women who are horrible like that but I would not want a girlfriend who never challenges me. That would be boring. How can a relationship work when the natural born leader (aka the male) submits leadership to the natural born follower (aka the female)? Easily. I consider my girlfriend an equal. When she annoys me I say so. Whe…
/r/TheRedPill28/08/14 02:00 PM
1

Edit: So to say you do not like a submissive woman sexually is to say you like to submit to her entering you. That's a silly thing to say. Of course not. I don't think sex is necessarily a submissive act. To describe somebody 'submitting' to something implies that they don't want it to happen or that it's something they cannot instigate themselves. Just because a woman is lying down it does not mean it is a submissive act. That's an irrelevant connection. A man could be lying on his back during …
/r/TheRedPill28/08/14 01:23 PM
0

Well I'm not sure about that. That's not really what I'm trying to argue though. What I'm saying is basing your arguments solely on your opinions and the opinions of those who agree with you isn't a sensible thing to do.
/r/TheRedPill28/08/14 01:10 PM
1

Since you describe submissive people as 'not doormats' i have become confused as to the definition of submissive. what would you consider submissive?
/r/TheRedPill28/08/14 12:59 PM
1

i agree with you. extremes in any direction are bad.
/r/TheRedPill28/08/14 12:45 PM
-1

also, I do not find sexual submissiveness attractive, so my point stands twofold
/r/TheRedPill28/08/14 12:24 PM
1

ah I misread. I read sexually submissive as submissive in general. But my point still stands as from my experience redpillers generally like women who are submissive.
/r/TheRedPill28/08/14 12:24 PM
-3

Hi I'm a male bluepiller. I think you are generalising a lot. I, for one, understand that there are certain qualities that are attractive and do not try to 'relabel' these qualities when I have trouble with them. The disagreement I have with your post is that you assume when somebody relabels a characteristic they secretly know that it is actually attractive. This is of course the case sometimes but often it is not. For example you list qualities such as submissiveness as attractive. Many people…
/r/TheRedPill28/08/14 11:38 AM
1

Hm I don't really get why it's hilarious. Surely it's a bad thing coz she'll get less hot?
/r/TheRedPill21/08/14 03:58 PM
2

how?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/14 12:29 PM
2

so is it just about infection risk?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/14 12:21 PM
4

ok i understand the sentiment that a woman with a history of cheating is less desirable because it makes you think "what if she cheats on me too". but promiscuity isn't the same as unfaithfulness. a girl who shags loads of men on one night stands doesn't become less faithful because of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/14 12:20 PM
2

lol. it's hard to beat yourself to death with a plank but its not desirable. It's hard to murder millions of people but it's not desirable. it's hard to be crowned the ugliest man alive but it's not desirable. it's hard to find girl with 0 sexual experience but it's not desirable
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/14 12:17 PM
4

I can't tell if you're being serious lol. Do you agree that rarity =\= desirability
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/14 11:36 AM
6

Ok let me use another example. People who are extreme neo nazis with gangrenous limbs are rare but very few people would want to go out with them. Basically what I'm saying is rarity =\= desirability
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/14 11:30 AM
4

Hmm maybe that has some force to it but it seems to be mostly anecdotal psuedo science on the part of trp
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/14 11:27 AM
1

Yes! I agree with you wholeheartedly
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/14 11:26 AM
8

Hmm I don't think you're right. I don't think girls really care how big your penis is as long as it's not tiny or unfeasably huge. Also I don't think many if any girls watch porn like you say
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/14 11:24 AM
3

but nobody would choose that their partner have a count of 500 if they could have the exact same partner but with a count of 5. Why not? You act like its just a fact but this is exactly what I'm asking about
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/14 11:23 AM
3

I don't think that's necessarily true. Serial killers aren't common but nobody wants to go out with a serial killer. Just coz somethings uncommon doesn't mean it's desirable unless it's an inherantly good thing in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/14 11:20 AM
1

I wouldn't go out with someone who had behaviour I had to 'tolerate'. I would go out with someone I liked
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/14 09:45 AM
0

There's nothing inherently wrong with it and if it works then ok. But I just think it's kind of creepy and weird.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/14 09:29 AM
1

You could just as easily say marxism/mens rights/protesting/politics is the opposite of TRP because one is about changing society and trp is about changing yourself. It doesn't make them opposites. I don't think what you said makes much sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/14 08:16 PM
2

I would not take dating advice from TRP any more than I would take weight loss advice from fat dudes. This is perfect
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/14 08:00 PM
1

I think the reason that no BP can answer you is because we genuinely don't know. It's not that we can't do it. It's that we just don't really think about it. Thos kind of thing just happens naturally and I think it feels weird to plan it and force it. I suppose that doesn't help if you are someone who has trouble with women but I think that's where a lot of bloopers are at
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/14 07:56 PM
1

I think it's because most blue pill females aren't in a position to advise men simply because of the different position they come from. But as a blue pill man I think that it's hard to give specific and quantified instruction or advice because most of us haven't actually thought that much about it. Put another way, I am happy with my life and relationships and I have achieved this not by following advice but by just being myself so it's hard to give advice coming from my viewpoint. Just my thoug…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/14 07:42 PM
0

I thought about it a bit more and i realised i shouldn't comment here really. I'm gonna let you guys do your thing even if i don't agree. sorry for being a bellend.
/r/askTRP09/03/14 11:21 PM
-24

yeah!
/r/askTRP09/03/14 09:45 PM
-1

Ok not really the captain of the football team, just thought that would be funny if I was. But real talk I am pretty sure she's not
/r/askTRP09/03/14 08:46 PM
0

Ok yeah fair points I concede. I guess we were just arguing about semantics
/r/askTRP09/03/14 08:41 PM
-1

yeah i agree that if she never has sex with him then he should take some kind of action but there's nothing implying that in his post. sex is supposed to happen its not like some kind of law that if you pay for something that there is some unspoken agreement that she owes you sex. I just don't understand this subreddit's obsession with sex. Just go have a wank and cure your blue balls and have sex some other time. no point if she's not in the mood.
/r/askTRP09/03/14 07:50 PM
-3

I think you're taking life too seriously if you think that your girlfriend not being in the mood for sex once is 'unacceptable'. Just saying if he was chill he may be happier and less like a spoilt man-child
/r/askTRP09/03/14 07:03 PM
2

huh? why not?
/r/askTRP09/03/14 05:39 PM
-52

or maybe you could not act like a spoilt man child brat and get over it
/r/askTRP09/03/14 05:12 PM
-15

You are really really cool
/r/askTRP09/03/14 12:50 PM
-9

Maybe she just wasn't in the mood. Just chill. Sex isn't the most important thing in the world.
/r/askTRP09/03/14 12:46 PM
1

RP isn't a doctrine, it's a set of tools and knowledge to enable success with women. What defines success is up to each person, but it runs the gamut between empty one-night stands with lots of beautiful women to enduring long-lasting relationships with a single partner. RP is just the candid, non-PC way of looking at how the world actually works. Ok fair enough. For starters, women don't respect a man as much if he's not someone they look up to. This is just obvious. RP has nothing against mutu…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/14 04:46 PM
1

I don't expect them to care what I think, I'm just saying my opinion. I think the difference between a rp guy and a normal guy is that for a rp guy their goal is sex with attractive and submissive women. Normal guys have goals such a mutual respect and strong friendship within a fun relationship. I think that's where the difference in opinion lies. Btw not saying rp goals are nessecarly wrong but just saying they seem a bit immature to me, but if thats what you go for then go for it. I'm not loo…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/14 03:18 PM
1

Yeah I understand the mindset of a RP man but I think the common denominator in most rp men is that they spent a lot of their early life as a weird loser and then wanted to change it so entered a community full of other weird losers who worked out a scientific formula of attracting women and then think that the ability to formulaicly attract women stops them being a weird loser but most of the time they are still a weird loser but now they have sex like a normal person. Which is fair enough. I t…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/14 01:53 PM
1

Hmm yeah I guess I would if I went through a string of failures. I would start analysing what went wrong and changing my behaviour
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/14 01:01 PM
1

Nope. I would just try and find someone more appreciative of me.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/14 11:03 AM
2

Thanks dude you're nice
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/14 06:51 PM
1

Since generalities derive from populations, and a binary state of two generalizations necessitates a ranking (e.g. either men or women must have a higher income than the other), who do you believe is more responsible on an qualified basis of responsibility, within the context of, "the most responsible teenager in the house," men or women? So basically what you're asking is who is more responsible in general? Hm. I genuinely couldn't say. For example my gf is much more responsible that me when it…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/14 06:50 PM
-1

Wow you're so cooooool I wish I was you! Standing up a girl and then posting about it on the internet! Woooow!!! You're so powerful!
/r/askTRP26/02/14 03:23 PM
4

Hiya, op here. Thought I'd answer your post from my own experience. The focus on the women, and encouraging special treatment for them while not giving a single fuck about men. I don't think this is true. Especially for me. I just believe there should be equal consideration for both peoples' needs. I could criticise rp thinking by saying it encourages special treatment for the man without giving a fuck about the woman. Focus on feel-good bullshit and politically correct statements instead of hon…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/14 01:42 PM
1

Yeah I agree
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/14 01:28 PM
1

Fair enough. How mysterious :P
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/14 01:08 PM
1

Sorry I didn't reply but I am in the uk and ill so was asleep before replies atarted coming in
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/14 12:57 PM
2

Blue pill in that I believe a relationship should be founded on respect and honesty from both parties and not just one. Also I believe a lot of red pill ideas are wrong or cruel. I am ok with it because I have lived my life believing it and I am happy. What else could I want.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/14 12:56 PM
1

Yeah it mostly just makes fun of theredpill. That's it really... It's just fun to make fun of people who take themselves too seriously
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/14 12:54 PM
3

Lol. I'm pretty sure I am respected. And even if I'm not I don't really mind. I am secure enough in myself to know that if someone doesn't respect me that's their problem. I just know I am having a good time in the relationship and she is too. Bottom line.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/14 12:52 PM
1

I agree! Obv the extreme feminists and the hardcore MRAs are never gonna get on but I think there's a rational middle ground
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/14 12:49 PM
2

Not married. Probably will do eventually. I live in the uk where people tend to get married later than in the us
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/14 12:48 PM
2

That makes sense I'd never thought about it like that before. I guess I just used BP as a way to distinguish myself from RP
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/14 12:47 PM
3

I wouldn't say I was disgusted with submissive women but I am not attracted to them. My type of woman is someone who has their own opinions and friends and an interesting personality. Someone who will disagree with me at times and bring new things to my life. Same thing I would look for in a friend. I find submissive women to be boring. I think that when you say your woman disobeys you it implies that they are supposed to obey me all the time. I think that's silly. I rarely tell anyone to do any…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/14 12:46 PM
2

I don't have a wife. But I do have a gf
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/14 12:37 PM
1

Hello :D
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/14 12:36 PM
1

Yes both, why?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/14 12:34 PM
2

At what?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/14 01:58 PM
0

I appreciate the interesting reads but I think you misunderstood where I was coming from. What I was trying to say was that you comparing an emotionless relationship with a woman to an emotionless relationship with friends did nothing but belittle the importance of emotions in both cases. This is a trend I've seen a lot on theredpill and seems quite weird to me. Also I don't think being a 'sex person' is much better than being a sex object. Both imply the person in question is only important for…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/14 04:54 PM
1

If you primarily laugh with your friends instead of sharing every other emotion, are your friends laughter objects? Yes. If you primarily have sex with a woman but share no other feelings is she a sex object? Yes. If you laugh with your friends but also respect them and love them platonically are they laughter objects? No they are friends. If you primarily have sex with a woman but also respect and love her while also enjoying her non sexual company is she a sex object? No she is a relationship …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/14 04:03 PM
0

seems like you were kind of mean to her
/r/askTRP02/12/13 08:15 PM
18

seems like you were kind of mean
/r/askTRP02/12/13 02:05 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter