TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

teeoth Archive

View 0 posts and 50 comments by teeoth on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Everyone should get paid according to the value of their work. Women are not on a level comparable to professional male players. They should be paid as much as amateurs are, that is nearly nothing. The very existence of women's professional sports is sexist.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 08:49 AM
20

How do you not use your age to convince a woman? Are you supposed to hide it? Pretend you are a minor so she cannot legally have sex with you?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/26 02:03 PM
–

There is no reason to base our understanding of science on heavily biased individual responses. Whenever topics like this come up feminists make incredible claims going so far as to state that women are the primary victims of war (they are about 100 times less affecteed, in fact). I agree that in many cases the male body may be taken as the default one as that makes a lot of things easier. As far as I know the same applies to studies on mice - male are preferred. I cannot find solid data that wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 07:51 AM
1

Thank you for visiting. Searching for valuable communities and trying to understand people with different views is a crucial part of growing as a person and understanding the world. I am very happy to see you do that. This is a difficult question. As others have pointed out, a lot of the time it seems to be men supported by women. I belive (and have seen that in my environment) that woman impose gender norms on their sons - and by that I mean only the parts of them that benefit women. Women vote…
/r/MensRights09/05/26 01:03 PM
1

"Women working has been the standard for everyone not in 1940-50s white America. " This is why I wrote about having your own money. " financial upkeep of the home. " not their own money they could fund dates with. "What on earth would ever make you think I don’t follow my own traditional responsibilities? " Because there is absolutely nothing left of that in you life until, perhaps, you get married. If you want to be so traditional you could cook dinner when you first meet. Otherwise, you expect…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/26 04:42 PM
–

I literally wrote that it should be more or less 50/50, in general. This should not be measured precisely, no one should demand equal compensation the way they would from their employer. But both parties should contribute and share their burdens. This example does not make sense. Buying a child is entirely different than having it with one's wife. Besides, men do not get that "for free" in a healthy relationship. They cannot give birth and breastfeed, but contribute in many other ways. If you se…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/26 04:23 PM
–

Yes, perhaps there are such women. But most of them are probably willing to leverage their situation and use it to extract resources from men. Besides, you are using a strawman. I did not mention spending as little as possible on a woman. I simply mean that no one should ever be expected to generally give more than they receive. We just met, you gave me nothing at all - why should I be required to pay you? I can do that, I can be kind, but this cannot be required.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/26 04:02 PM
–

You follow traditional gender norms... yet you went to college, work and have your own money. You albo picked your fiancee yourself, instead of your father telling you who you should marry. This is hardly traditional. Out of everything traditional you kept the privileges but disregarded any limitations and responsibilities. "When I was in college, I DID do all of that because I think that’s what makes a good host." If you invited people all the time while covering all the costs and getting nothi…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/26 03:58 PM
–

"chances to receive courtship past the honeymoon phase are slim" If by courtship you mean entertaining you, paying for you etc. while getting little in return - then I do not think you should ever receive that. Get to know someone, see what they are like in the long term, see if they genuinely care about you - and than consider having children. "It's highly unlikely that a man who insists on and is used to "50/50" will suddenly change his mind" He is not supposed to change his mind. Marriage sho…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/26 03:51 PM
–

"Your mistake is that you think, in this arrangement, men are giving more." You claim that I am making a mistake, yet you do not explain how. In the last line you even ask about it. It is simple - a man and a woman meet for a meal, they both provide their company and that's just about it. If someone pays for the meal - they give more. There is nothing inherently wrong about that, it is obviously fine to be kind, but giving more should not be a requirement. What is more - in practice men usually …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/26 03:30 PM
–

You are hardly supposed to get pregnant after your first date. You will have plenty od time to assess how a given man treats a woman who also treats him well. My points still stand.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/26 03:00 PM
–

Why would someone be generous with a girl they just met? What makes you think you deserve a man's best behaviour? "if he’s scared he’s going to do something for her" Maybe he is just worried that a girl is a gold digger. Especially if he is rich he may want someone who would love him as a person, not as an ATM. He's weeding out girls who care mostly about how much a man is willing to spend on them.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/26 01:57 PM
–

"A lot of women get the "ick" from men asking to split the bill. " Because they want your money. If you want someone who genuinely appreciates you as a person, than you should not care about that sort of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/26 01:48 PM
–

I understood that. But why is it so important? Again, it boils down to testing if someone's belief is "I should pay for women", since they do not know that you will agree to split the bill. What kind of cultural milieu is based on men giving more in a relationship? What makes you think that it is a crucial part of life for men to court women, to give them more, than they receive?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/26 01:44 PM
–

"Because an average woman still earns less," This is a generalisation. Does not really impact your personal situation. There are plenty of women who earn more than blu-collar men. Besides, what if there are racial differences as well? Asian women earn more than white men, I think, and definitely more than black men. Does this mean an asian kidergadren teacher should buy dinner a black investment banker? "and an average woman still has a child -" an even greater generalisation. A lot of women say…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/26 01:38 PM
–

It is fine to be clear. Is it really a deal breaker for you, finding a man who will support you financially? If it is, I believe you should recognise that no one should be your provider from the first day. They barely know you. And they may be interested in someone who wants them for their personality etc, not their money. They may want to filter out such women even if they genuinely dream of a stay at home wife
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/26 07:43 AM
–

Being a "kind and giving soul" to someone you just met is just naive. Especially if someone spends his last dollars to buy you a coffee. This would be just stupid. 2. Why should a men have to show that he is kind and giving, and a woman should not? 3. I believe that when a man pays for the date he risks entertaining a woman who just wants him for his money, not anything deeper.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/26 07:21 AM
–

So the crucial values you want to pass down are men paying for women? Why is it so important?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/26 07:12 AM
12

Ah, Yes, billions of distasteful actions per second. That is at least two billion for four billion men and boys. One action every other second, sleep included. Even in my dreams I fantasise about hurting a different woman every two seconds just to pump the statistics.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/04/26 06:36 PM
-1

I am sorry, but it just does not work like that. You do nit have a right not to have children. You are a part of a civilised society and you need to do your part. One day you will retire and you Will require the Labour of younger generations to support you. Why should you have the right to benefit from it if you did nothing to create it? Some people devote a lot of money, time, stress elan energy to raise their children... Others just relax, invest and actually end up a lot better of. How is it …
/r/MensRights19/04/26 03:03 PM
1

In this case I believe the argument makes sense. It is not necessarily about danger, just comfort. Japanese trains May require a lot of force to enter, they are really packed. I understand that women May feel uncomfortable being squished between men. However, it is discriminatory to provide women-only cars and mixed cars. It would be fair if there were also cars for Men. Just like toilets. Although overall I am not quite fond of this solution. The cars May be in different places, they May be Pin…
/r/MensRights14/04/26 09:48 PM
15

Carriages for women are still used on Japanese trains. There is nothing illegal in ignoring the signs and a few men do that.
/r/MensRights01/03/26 11:22 PM
6

This is ad hominem. Please concentrate on OP's claims
/r/MensRights11/02/26 03:24 PM
17

As a matter of fact, above 90% of Police victims are men. George Floyd was a man, too, but that Just was not discussed. Perhaps if he was a woman the officers would not be so brutal. I remember media outlets citing research showing that courts suffer from a racial bias... And completely ignoring the sex bias, even if 8t was discussed literally in the papers they had quoted anyway
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/01/26 07:19 PM
44

The most tricky act of misandry is not letting people talk about misandry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/26 10:26 AM
6

You are absokutely right. We can also add that there is a difference between numerous painful procedures performed with primitive methods and a modern surgery. Not to mention that there are many other surgeries and invasive procedures, plenty of them only for women
/r/MensRights31/12/25 07:07 PM
0

> 0.1% of people. Not 'men'. The last time you wrote it was 1%. In the past 1-2 centuries, a lot more than 0,1% had the opporutinity to get educated. You are correct, most men in history had to do hard labour, but even for the small fraction who could lead a better life, men were privileged. This is not the case in a feminist society. And in the past 1-2 centuries, a lot more men could do many interesting things in life, but not so many women, most of the time. >You're the spokesperson, not the …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/12/25 06:27 PM
-4

This also included doctors, lawyers, political leaders, academics etc. Not to mention leading within your family, church and local community. Even progressives (e.g. Bentham) believed that women are simply dumber and can never really compete with men. In XIX-XXth century the educated middle class made up a lot more than 1% of society. Especially in the USA quite a few men rose from rags to riches - their journey would be a lot more difficult if they were women. It is true that for most men in hi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/12/25 04:39 PM
4

Indeed, in many ways, traditionalism is unfair to men, especially when it comes to modern issues. However, in many ways, it is incomparable to feminism. I see it as follows: in the past, both men and women had their roles, their duties, responsibilities and privileges. Women stayed at home, gave birth and took care of the children; men did all of the worst labour, fought in absolutely terrifying wars, etc. Women had the privileges you mention, but men could expect their obedience and the satisfa…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/12/25 11:17 AM
-8

How does capitalism deify women? Besides, I do not really think that in Europe women had control over sex until recently. They were usually supposed to stay virgins and then marry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/12/25 11:02 AM
9

Ah, Yes, beasts of burden. As we all know society loves making women do all of the most dangerous, stressful and harmful jobs. We also make them die in our wars
/r/EverydayMisandry16/12/25 02:48 PM
38

Now replace "men" with "black People" and see if you are still allowed to generalise like that
/r/EverydayMisandry27/11/25 03:07 PM
36

This pipeline exists, it is called "mainstream politics". We cannot expect the mainstream to criticise itself.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/11/25 01:56 PM
9

How delusional one has to be to believe that women only get helped when men get help first? Mens issues are absent from the mainstream. Menslib wasmentioned. Well, it stil is feminist. I got banned from there because I wrote I do not feel like an opressor responsible for all historical atrocities only because I was born a man.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/11/25 06:20 AM
3

But it is partially caused by dating issues. Women are better at forming support networks, they do better without a signuficant other. Less men have access to sex, romantic relationship and for them it is often a more serious issue than for women
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/25 09:06 AM
0

No doubt. So is the case with many modern marriages and most of them break up anyway. Some studies show that arranged marriage provide comparable happiness. Anyway, IMO in any case of a marriage the couple should be psychologically examined. There are quite a few People who should never get children, but they do. I am far from being sure about the Best solutions but I amcertain that we face extinction when it comes to fertility, so we must act radically
/r/MensRights16/10/25 01:52 PM
-1

It would also propably get better if monogamy and marriage were socially expected from People, as it used to be. This would mean a lot when it comes to the current demographic catastrophy as well
/r/MensRights16/10/25 01:45 PM
-4

A lot of men are Just hell bent against opening up, Talking about their feelings and therapy. Later, when they have issues thay Just kill themselves instead of Talking about it. I am not aware of any research which could cast any light on what could help men in general, but it would seem that teaching communication skills, emotional support etc would make sense. It is not very expensive and helps in many other ways.
/r/MensRights16/10/25 01:38 PM
4

Would you be so kind to provide links to those studies?
/r/MensRights09/10/25 02:30 PM
-8

Yes, you are correct. Many people here get emotional, generalise and to do women the very things they hate when they are done to them
/r/MensRights09/10/25 09:13 AM
0

Yes, i would be. What is wrong? 2. I do not see anything about a date in the pictures. 3. Of course sex is relevant. Women have vastly different needs in a relationship compared to men. You are extremely unlucky to make girl happy by treating her the same as you do your male friends.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/09/25 08:04 PM
-6

I do not think there is anything wrong with it. This sounds like very positive, loving upbringing. You cannot expect that she mentions every single important issue 8n every post. This is not a text book, this is social media. Indeed there are many other aspects of being ina. Good relationship including settin boundaries and Talking about your needs, but nothing in this post suggests that this is not taught.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/09/25 01:39 PM
3

99% of the time feminists mention gender equality when it benefits women or when you accuse them of not suppoting equality. It is quite funny that they dont even have men in the name of the movement. North Korea has democracy in its name, but feminists could not be bothered even to raise a facade
/r/MensRights11/09/25 06:31 PM
2

You are mostly right. It Just so happens that women are naturally better and more educated when it comes to therapy, social issues, communication. Women are better at helping others in those ways and they simply rarely want to help men
/r/MensRights11/09/25 06:28 PM
2

If you were truly legal equals you would have to fight in every war, you would get the same pumishment for your crimes you would have to either carry as much as men or be paid less, our mental health issues would not be ignored by the government etc. In Poland we have a 7:1 suicide rate and 60/65 years retitrment Age. No one in the mainstream cares.
/r/MensRights11/09/25 06:25 PM
2

How am I responsible for the exploitation that happened before I was even born? Why should I suffer for someone elses sins?
/r/MensRights11/09/25 06:21 PM
-3

It does not lead to this conclusion. Children fare best with both parents. But it is quite obvious that Little children will ussualy do better with their mother
/r/MensRights05/09/25 07:13 PM
-7

Hardly anyone demands that men are sole breadwinners, but feminism glorified financial independence for women. That leads to them not willing to have children and a demographic catastrophy. It is also Natural for Men to work more, because women are usually better with children, can feed them etc So. It makes sense for women to stay home for a while.
/r/MensRights05/09/25 04:45 PM
5

Could you possibly send me the content of your removed post?
/r/MensRights01/09/25 09:06 AM
0

Ah, Yes, those Evil men and their u fair advantage of shuffle deck suffering more from diseases and accidents. Also, id you want to disengage from from systems build by men... Then you should probably live ina cave, away from all those inventions of the white man
/r/MensRights30/08/25 05:57 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter