TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

teetheyes Archive

View 0 posts and 50 comments by teetheyes on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

And you assume I'm a kid because I asked you a legit question about a statement you made that you can't back up? So, are you often outsmarted by children? Is that why you can't elaborate
/r/MensRights15/01/19 03:15 PM
0

Lol for real, you have nothing else to back that statement up with?
/r/MensRights15/01/19 07:00 AM
0

Where? Why? Like, they just block all tests across the board no exceptions?
/r/MensRights14/01/19 08:35 PM
1

Let's look at some examples found in just this post alone. I think it's also inportant to note that the article said nothing about femenists, it was totally invented by the OP. "Obvious answer is that it is so common place that society would be destroyed by the infidelity of bitches. Feminists don’t want accountability and responsibilities for mess and chaos being created by women. I am so fucking ahead of my time. I was saying women cheaters are an epidemic for many years, and up until just rec…
/r/MensRights13/01/19 07:24 PM
1

Why shouldn't a legitimate test be administered and concluded by an educated professional? If a test has legal consequences, why shouldn't it be overseen by a judge?
/r/MensRights13/01/19 07:14 PM
-1

If you're looking at the same source OP posted, it was pointed out that no one's made a move for that in nearly 20 years. OP is manipulating you.
/r/MensRights13/01/19 07:12 PM
1

The problem with casual femenists is that we are actually normal people, and we are exposed to communities like men's rights where we're told "fuck you, fuck all femenists, we hate you, all women are terrible people, all women are manipulative selfish bloodsucking backstabbing sluts, if it we're up to me you'd do nothing without a man's consent and that is equality, you whore" and then we go "oh. okay, you have fun with that" and then you guys go "femenists don't want equality"
/r/MensRights13/01/19 06:56 PM
1

Idk it's just weird how you guys here at men's rights are always like "men's rights yeah!" And then 90% of the comments are like "let's punish women too while we're at it, whores", like, which is more important to you?
/r/MensRights13/01/19 06:50 PM
1

Show me where it says anyone is openly railing against paternity tests. The part OP made up doesn't count.
/r/MensRights13/01/19 06:43 PM
4

No, it's just that OP made that part up. The article didn't say anything about femenists.
/r/MensRights13/01/19 06:42 PM
2

The article didn't actually say anything about femenists or anyone that wants to stop men from persuing their own paternity test, OP made that part up to manipulate you and it worked.
/r/MensRights13/01/19 06:42 PM
-1

Look at your "cause". Look at the article, it said absolutely nothing about femenism. Look at the title, why did OP feel the need to throw that sensational bit about femenists in? Are you being manipulated?
/r/MensRights13/01/19 06:37 PM
1

The article said nothing about femenism. Femenists are not against paternity testing.
/r/MensRights13/01/19 06:34 PM
5

And what's sad is that the dailymail didn't even say anything about femenism, OP made that shit up because the dailymail wasn't shitty enough for this sub on its own.
/r/MensRights13/01/19 06:32 PM
0

The ones he made out of straw.
/r/MensRights13/01/19 06:31 PM
1

Like, in general, or the mail order home kit type?
/r/MensRights13/01/19 06:30 PM
2

Did you read the article? It said nothing about femenists, OP made that shit up.
/r/MensRights13/01/19 06:29 PM
3

The article said absolutely nothing about femenists. Femenists are not against paternity testing. OP just threw that in their because it's not a men's rights post unless someone is blaming woman for everything wrong in the world.
/r/MensRights13/01/19 06:28 PM
4

if that prospect worries a woman she's probably a really shit person. Exactly. It's not a femenist thing, it's not men vs women thing, it's a case of "shit people exist, and they do shit things", I don't know why OP is trying to frame it like there's an international coordinated effort by women to trap you into raising Chad's kid.
/r/MensRights13/01/19 06:24 PM
-8

I don't understand why OP needed to invent an enemy for this one? The article says absolutely nothing about femenists. Femenists aren't against paternity testing. Femenists are not trying to trick you into raising someone else's kid. The only purpose of this sub is to convince the casual observer that women are the enemy and femenism is the conductor. It's misogyny disguised as activism.
/r/MensRights13/01/19 06:15 PM
1

Id be interested to see what percentage of women are actually smarmy gender studies professors or demon femenazis and what percentage of women are just normal people out right put off by the vitriol people here espouse. It's reslly hard to support someone when you feel like they already hate you.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 10:50 PM
0

This is what I see he said: Everyone had difficult lives in the past, and you could even argue that men had it worse. Everyone had difficult lives. And you could even argue that men had it worse. Which mean's he isn't arguing that, just arguing that men didn't have it better. Yeah. Everyone had difficult lives pre industry. I'm arguing that women didn't have it better. What's the problem? I'm a female who's all for men's rights, but I'm sure you'll treat me like this fragile, pampered, lazy idio…
/r/MensRights20/11/17 10:22 PM
1

it was only during economic depressions that women were forced to work outside the home. You mean, when everyone get so desperate they said "ok you can leave the house I guess" lol It's telling that the poorest women often chose to be prostitutes rather than work in the conditions that men were subject to. Do you think she could have just walked up to the coal mine and asked for a job, and they'd be like "sure happy to have you aboard" and they'd hand her a helmet and ride down the shaft togethe…
/r/MensRights20/11/17 10:14 PM
1

women weren't allowed to do much of anything but sweep and cook. Absolute rubbish. There are records of female blacksmiths going back to the middle ages, and women exercised enormous power in their communities and in the home. Which was sort of my point, OP chose to compare 12 hours of field work to "sweeping mopping and cooking", he was clearly trying to down play the role of your average woman in history, which I disagree with. You're acting like women wanted to go work in coal mines. How do y…
/r/MensRights20/11/17 06:53 PM
0

Don't be so obtuse. He was comparing working 12+ hours in a field to sweeping. Of course women did other things, important things, which was my point, but OP here was clearly trying to paint a different picture. He’s not treating you like a damn thing, I never said he was treating anyone like a "thing"? Unless you mean the "straw-woman" bit? Because that's not literal, it's a type of fallacy. You have turned yourself into a victim because he is disagreeing with your incorrect assessment of histo…
/r/MensRights20/11/17 06:27 PM
7

The notion that all men in history sat around smoking cigars and celebrating oppressing women is horseshit. But the notion that all women in history just happily sat around doing light house work for fun and celebrating the absence of their husbands, brothers, sons, and fathers while at war isn't horseshit? You've conveniently forgotten that for most of our written history women weren't allowed to do much of anything but sweep and cook. I'm a female who's all for men's rights, but I'm sure you'l…
/r/MensRights20/11/17 01:04 AM
-1

I hear you. I think people that like olives must have something wrong with their head. I don't like olives and I don't understand why anyone would, the mothers must have smoked or done drugs while pregnant with them. There's got to be some neural transmitters going haywire for anyone to perceive such an awful taste as anything but a flavor abomination. Anytime I see someone eating olives I go out of my way to tell them how disgusting what they're doing is, I just can't understand why anyone woul…
/r/PussyPassDenied01/09/17 06:14 PM
5

usually when a woman or girl is given a pussypass they aren't literaly checked for a vagina or ovaries, because the vagina is not relevant to the way society interacts with women who present as such outwardly. For example, a woman who presents as a man probably wouldn't get a pussypass as everyone thinks they are a man, even though they have a vagina. I know you know this but you were just acting really dumb so you could make a joke about trans people. HESHES A SHEHE LOL AMIRITE?
/r/PussyPassDenied01/09/17 06:05 PM
119

"Overinflated sense of self-worth" - Check That's the part that always gets me, all these loud, vocal "types" that act like they have some authority to speak on complicated subjects, who barley finished highschool. Like, you're a model. When did models become known for speaking intelligently. Furthermore, it's not like a white girl can walk into CVS and find her exact skin color either, unless you're one of the lucky few your foundation is always going to be slightly darker/lighter/pinker/yellow…
/r/PussyPassDenied01/09/17 05:57 PM
1

I said I haven't seen comments that are actually on the level of woman-hating that aren't heavily downvoted. Yeah, it's not the people who are blatantly saying "I hate women" that concerns me, like I said, it's the comments disguised as jokes and the minor remarks and the tone, the little things that everyone lets them get away with. You're generalizing the hell out of this sub and its users, but heaven forfend we apply the same treatment to feminists. There are lots of examples of batshit crazy…
/r/MensRights08/07/17 06:24 AM
2

Yeah. What I'm most bothered by is that I know you can use layman's terms to explain something without using disparaging words like "sweetie" to refer to grown ass woman. A dude talking to dude would never be like, "look, sweetie..", so why does it seem okay to say to a female? It's weird, haha. It makes me feel weird.
/r/MensRights08/07/17 05:44 AM
2

It's almost like most people wouldn't understand if I went in detail about electrical matters why would the dude assume a 16 year old knows more about the unit than the gm? It needed fluid. I knew it needed fluid because it leaks. I knew it had leaks because you could see it, and I had to replenish it often.
/r/MensRights08/07/17 03:17 AM
4

the auto mod won't allow links to this site (who's other journalistic endeavours include a rug, kesha, "how old was Rooney Mara when she first ate pie?", are we seriously taking this seriously) but shit-posty screen shots that conveniently leave everything out are alright The author is writing about the under representation of brown women as component lead characters in movies. How does that effect anyones rights
/r/MensRights07/07/17 09:02 PM
4

I've never seen any comment about keeping women in the kitchen or anything like it Really,that's all you have to say? Nothing about the hostile users, shitposts, the substandard and irrelevant comments, the blame culture, or the fact that this sub isn't even functioning as a place for actual discussion of men's rights, just "nu uh no one said literally that" The second highest voted comment right now: Here we see the word "mansplaining" in its natural environment: shutting down an argument a wom…
/r/MensRights07/07/17 08:00 PM
7

I have a story, if you don't mind, I had been running this tiny restaurant for years. To save money we did repairs our selves. And by "ourselves" I mean me, because most of the staff were teenagers. Plumbing, piping, tiling, repairing/refilling the ac, fixing drywall and replacing doors and windows, wiring the lights and stereo, alarms/security systems, I did it all, I was very intimate with all the details of the store. We get new owners and they want us to use their family repair guy for anyth…
/r/MensRights07/07/17 07:35 PM
15

Most people who aren't active here already think this sub is garbage, it's users are hostile and no matter the content comments will devolve into something along the lines of "everything is woman's fault why did we let them leave the kitchen." It's a shame there isn't a place to actually discuss what "men's rights" means, how it impacts the average person, and other social issues that those on the other side might not realize effect men in such a way.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 07:00 PM
0

You're in Canada, right? do you realize that, 1. You're still at war 2. That that the economy of CDN is closely linked to the success of the US And 3. Canada always has time for trivial bullshit
/r/PussyPassDenied05/07/17 12:45 AM
0

times of extended peace Lol. We've been at war for like 15 years, just because you've gotten used to it doesn't mean there is peace.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/07/17 12:09 AM
37

Who hurt you
/r/PussyPassDenied05/07/17 12:00 AM
0

What's your point? My point is that women did not have the option to fight in war and perform the same meaningful jobs 100 years ago, and so to imply otherwise is a false pretense. A false pretense is a statement meant to deceive others.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/17 11:46 PM
3

They were told to die so the women back home could live. Don't try and tell me that's privelege. Really. You honestly believe that was the only reason men were sent to war, to protect the women, not to protect our land, our economy, the rights and liberties of ALL Americans? And I said nothing about "privelege", stop projecting.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/17 11:36 PM
-1

thousands of years of death and misery by men who had to risk and do everything You make it sound like women had the option to fight in war and perform the same meaningful jobs 100 years ago but just said nah, I'm gonna hang out here at home and do nothing hmu tho
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/17 10:09 PM
4

Perhaps, in this particular area, they aren't testing for ability to retain and employ knowledge when requested, but for ability to articulate a complex event, understanding of content and its impact, relevance to modern day, etc. It's a history test, after all, not every question is going to be a pass/fail type deal, a lot of history exams are about chronology of event and their impact. The ability to store and regurgitate a specific date probably won't help you if the question is something alo…
/r/MensRights11/06/17 06:13 PM
2

I meant that I wish people would stop saying it cause it's so ridiculous even in jest. Just like saying this person can't be discriminated against because of their skin color. It's stupid, it's not even funny anymore, it doesn't really help the discussion at all. I'm sorry you're so quick to push your own victim complex that you can't even see the point anymore. I'll try to be more sensitive of that fact in the future.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/17 08:05 PM
2

What? Do you honestly believe a man can't be discriminated against or are you totally misunderstanding the situation and attempting some shitty sarcasm
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/17 05:32 PM
1

Is there any other reason they wouldn't require mothers to have proof? Edit: other commenters are saying OPs completely is untrue, that California only requires proof if custody is in question , and mothers aren't immune.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/17 03:09 PM
2

I wish people would stop saying this, even jokingly.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/17 03:08 PM
-1

Does that mean you believe men are immune to making irrational decisions under pressure or stress?
/r/MGTOW02/03/17 01:06 AM
1

Do you mean to imply that men don't marry for money or status, are immune to rumors, and have never gone back on their word or turned traitor?
/r/MGTOW02/03/17 01:04 AM
2

Genuine question, What is destabilizing in a woman's nature that is not present in a man's?
/r/MGTOW01/03/17 07:29 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter