TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

tehjdot Archive

View 0 posts and 79 comments by tehjdot on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Don't get me wrong. I don't mean to imply that men are especially gifted at the arts. Most of history only the rich and powerful could read and write. Which generally were men. But the notion that men can't express themselves is just silly.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 10:22 PM
1

I'd wager it is a much much wider phenomena than people really realise. At risk of sounding like an SJW, I do think white knighting is an innate systemic bias within our society. But I believe there are very good evolutionary reasons for it.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 10:10 PM
1

Your logic on abortion is flawed. You are taking the morally correct view (in my opinion) that a fetus is a person. And you are asserting that no one has the right to kill the fetus. What you fail to see however is that no human has the right to another persons body. Therefor the fetus has no legal protection against abortion. Maybe one day we might have access to the technology to allow for fetal extractions to allow unwanted fetus to come full term.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 04:36 PM
1

Capetalism is the most moral economic system in existence. Profit is another word for value. Capitalistic transactions only occur where there is value exchanged between two or more willing participant. Its the essence of freedom, and freedom generally is pretty moral.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 11:56 AM
1

She's right. It's just called racism.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 11:51 AM
2

I've never bought the feminist proposition that men at large suffer from a lack of emotional expression. That were not taught how to communicate our feelings. It's my belief that it's society at large who fail to really understand what men are saying when they do speak up. Not that men are incapable. I mean, isn't most of history's art produced by men?
/r/MensRights07/08/18 11:34 AM
2

White knight complex Id imagine.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 11:28 AM
1

They have a corruption culture really.
/r/MensRights31/07/18 02:38 PM
1

Lol. That's ridiculous. Capitalism, the ability to trade goods and services freely with individuals is the enactment of economic freedom. Capitalism is the most moral economic system in existence. Corruption is inherit to human beings, not Capitalism.
/r/MensRights29/07/18 12:18 PM
1

You do realise "our corporate overlords" are the ones chiefly responsible for the fact that we live in the healthiest, happiest, safest and most prosperous time in human history? And without fail communism leads to starvation and suffering why? Because it's an immoral system that has no place amongst a society composed of human beings.
/r/MensRights28/07/18 06:23 PM
2

I'd wager 99% of the men in prison come from violent backgrounds as children. Their logic just doesn't hold water even at the most funerntal level.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 03:21 PM
1

I think your not being charitable enough. Feels like your sticking to pedantics rather than acknowledging the blatant double standard. Why aren't women also subject to selective service? That's what it cost men to vote.
/r/MensRights27/06/18 11:09 AM
1

It's actually an issue in both categories. Not to accuse you of being stupid or dishonest, but you've fallen into the trap of poor education. Our understanding of our histories inequalities have been tainted by many different pressure groups unfortunately. Men as a group earned the 'right' to vote through conscription. The logic being if your going to die for a country you deserve some say. The suffragettes pushed for 'voting equality' but didn't take on the whole package. Voting has always been…
/r/MensRights27/06/18 11:00 AM
10

Your against circumcision, but you believe the parents have the right to do it to their child? Does this extend to their daughters? Does this include tattoos? Can I cut an ear off the child? Where's the line? Circumcision is considered child abuse. Child abuse is already illegal. Why isn't circumcision held to the same standard?
/r/MensRights27/06/18 09:47 AM
1

FYO Egalitarianism is the movement that fights for gender equality. Feminism fights for female empowerment.
/r/MensRights26/06/18 01:54 PM
0

No, he's saying she should act like a grown ass women. Nut up, go to work, and trust the father of her children to be just that. The father of her children. That and she get over the crass double standard she's set.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 11:00 AM
2

I think this is exactly how it used to be in the West as well, legally. Basically. Most examples of historical 'patriarchy' are skewed visions of the past. Men had a responsibility to provide and look after their family. They'd get a bollocking from other men if their wife and children went hungry. What a lot of people fail to realise, is that their criticism of nearly any given subject, is half the time just a criticism of the people.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 10:51 AM
1

It assumes that women aren't sexual predators as well. Or that women don't rape women.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 10:34 AM
1

In addition the drug was originally developed for that purpose. I remember watching a documentary on 'extreme doctors'. There was a couple who ran a clinic waaaay up in the Himalayas (I think). They had to treat a patient who was going into cardiac arrest (I think), and they administered a Viagra to bring him back to stable condition.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 10:16 AM
1

As long as the beef flaps are tidy!
/r/MensRights09/04/18 10:12 AM
3

The funny thing is that as women become more and more educated, their going to price themselves out of the dating market. There's going to be increased competition at the top for the 'best men'.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 09:19 AM
3

The whole world is our space apparently! Except for their safe spaces that is.....
/r/MensRights09/04/18 09:12 AM
1

push their anti-capitalist agenda It's not even anti-capitalist. It's just a movement within our society that encourages politicising feelings over facts.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 08:44 AM
1

The same with the bonuses despite our bonuses being 100% target driven, nothing discretionary its purely on performance men earn a lot more bonus than women and several women have held meetings with us on fixing this but there is nothing to fix I assume you explained this to the women in the meetings? What were their responses?
/r/MensRights09/04/18 08:42 AM
1

Capitalism is a system. And like any system we can alter it. It doesn't have to apply to every aspect of society. Whenever I argue with someone, I always point out the flaws they perceive to lie with capitalism are just flaws in policy.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/03/17 11:07 PM
3

a woman to lie about her sexual partner count in contemplation of marriage. that's fraud. What? How would you even enforce that? It'd be all hearsay. How would either parties provide evidence that would be of sufficient standard in a court? Come on man. That's pretty retarded.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/03/17 06:58 PM
1

No. Never throw the first punch, unless it's self defence. I would go find an energy drink to throw on her, so it's sticky. And probably throw some dirt at her to ice the cake.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/03/17 06:48 PM
3

no. they should not. Yes, yes they should. We should all have equality of opportunity, not outcome. So what if divorce rates are low? So what if a nuclear family is the best. People should still be allowed to do what they want. What we need is a more educated population, that is more informed on the truth. I
/r/PussyPassDenied13/03/17 06:28 PM
2

Same in Manchester. When you order an Uber, it's common knowledge to think about where they can actually pick you up.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/03/17 06:22 PM
4

I'm disputing your claim that there are no skilled jobs that females occupy. I've seen first hand evidence of the opposite. Your comments come of incredibly petty and downright false. The only skill women have in the workplace that I see daily is just being as shitty and catty as possible with patients, customers and clients and pissing them off with their childish games and spitefulness. We can talk about percentages, and I'd give you that women are more likely than men to act in this way. But …
/r/MensRights03/02/16 07:55 PM
5

I've worked in a pcb manufacturing factory where there was hundreds of women working the line. There were many skilled women who'd worked there for nearly 2 decades. We had quotas, and performance reviews. It's ridiculous to assert that women don't have skills. They tend to be averse to physically demanding jobs, like building a cabinet.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 07:17 PM
1

Then require donors to have some sort of DNA sample of the database. It can all be done anonymously. A 'father' still has a the right to privacy, even if you are biologically related.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 03:28 AM
1

Why do you feel like that? I've always thought it was the people who chose to raise you that deserved the titles of 'mother' or 'father'. Likewise they are the ones who signed up for the responsibility of raising a child. The donor is just there to help them accomplish something they couldn't due to their roll of natures dice.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 03:40 PM
1

This is one of my greatest hopes for the outcome of the MRA group. I identify as an egalitarian first and foremost, and then I accept the functions that MRA's and Feminists perform. To me, they are an incredibly effective way of building support structures and affecting change. However, and this is their greatest flaw. These groups support a sub-conscious in-group vs out-group mindset. This can build up and derail the efforts of the group. I believe most of make a conscious effort to be as parti…
/r/MensRights05/06/14 02:01 AM
3

(1) good people must actively oppose the hateful ideas of bad people. If we ban obscene comments, how are we supposed to do this?
/r/MensRights11/05/14 06:38 AM
2

There is a difference between being totally fine, and having broken the law. I might want to smash your head into the door, but I wouldn't. Probably. And if I was fined, I would understand, and probably think it was worth it depending on the sum of the fine.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 10:13 PM
2

I definitely looks like he re-engaged her. In a situation where your are defending yourself like this, you would back up. Put you back against a wall, and have your arms up. He clearly followed her and pushed her when her back was turned (@ 0.43). I can totally understand his reaction. I've totally been there, but you have to realise that isn't the point where you keep fighting. You go and call the police.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 06:31 AM
1

I would think, even if you never use it, it would be a useful tool for you to much more accurately quote yourself and anyone you've spoken to in the case of a follow up review.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 06:11 PM
2

I find it interesting how the president has a very small shot, and it doesn't end with him. Ideally, you would have him right at the end, with a longer than average shot, because he should carry a voice of power. Instead they end with Daniel Craig. (?). Now, like I say all the time. There is literally no need to gender the statement. If it affects both genders, choosing to address only one side a at time alienates the other half, and it wastes resources. If they said "If he or she says no, then …
/r/MensRights01/05/14 03:18 PM
4

And to add onto your point, a deviation from normal could be seen as good or bad. Totally agree with you. But the important thing for me at least, is that it doesn't imply that it good or bad. Honestly, we can usually just skip ahead to the conclusion because it is obvious and most people are intelligent.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 03:24 AM
14

I believe technically, the 'deviant' sexualities are 'abnormal'. And that is A-fucking-o'kay. Normality strictly refers to the occurrence rate of something. It shouldn't have any implications on the morality of the subject. I get caught out all the time when I saw something it 'weird', or unusual. Many people have initially taken offence to it until I clarify I'm just saying it isn't something that I've seen before, and that I'm saying I'm interested in the subject.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 02:38 AM
2

It seems to me, that you are making more assumptions than I. Yahoo's stock prices have doubled in the last year. They are clearly doing something right. Furthermore, To become the absolute best place to work, communication and collaboration will be important, so we need to be working side-by-side. That is why it is critical that we are all present in our offices. Speed and quality are often sacrificed when we work from home. We need to be one Yahoo, and that starts with physically being together…
/r/MensRights07/04/14 02:32 AM
1

I always like to preface my arguments with "Here in the West." I think most people would agree, including a significant portion of feminists that the west is pretty much fine. There are a few relatively minor issues here and there that need to be cleaned up. But most of my arguments hinge on the principle that feminism is no longer needed here, and that most feminist movements, while well intentioned, are wasted effort. And in some cases they are actively causing damage. Feminist movements have …
/r/MensRights07/04/14 02:13 AM
1

It's more like "Flexible work hours leads to better productivity, leading to more and or better work done." Furthermore, getting off early one day, doesn't mean that they doesn't make the hours up another day.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 02:07 AM
1

Is that not still an example of discrimination?
/r/MensRights27/03/14 06:08 PM
13

"I’ve been winked at, talked down to, asked if I was going to cry and been the subject of dirty jokes. This is normal stuff amongst people right? Has nothing to do with gender.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 10:16 PM
1

I would cross out men, and write 'people'. It is very likely women engage in the same behavior at about the same frequency. Especially with such a loose definition of harassment.
/r/MensRights05/03/14 03:17 AM
2

You should have included the third speakers name in your title. The moderator was horrible. Naomi is clearly a very good bullshitter. In one of her first comments she contradicts herself, and still rolls with it.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 06:33 PM
2

What about the guy? He is three times more likely to be victim of violence. Based on your logic we should be stopping everyone and checking to see if they are ok.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 10:29 AM
1

There is an assumption that strength is purely a positive trait. I think strength (outside of a purely physical means) boils down to willingness towards risk-taking behavior, while 'weakness' is a risk minimising behavior. They both have their benefit's, and weaknesses.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 09:09 PM
0

Wait what? "Women earn more than men in NY, a city controlled by Wall Street which is almost entirely male dominated? Please. Talk to any professional woman in NYC and she'll give you a list of all of the men around her who have less experience/education but make more money than she does. Forget the median salaries. Take a look at the average salaries. Who can take this survey seriously?" Correct me of I'm wrong, but isn't median an average? And trying to discredit a study with anecdotal evidenc…
/r/MensRights13/02/14 10:03 PM
3

I don't think it is a matter of conservatives here. She clearly isn't the sharpest tool in the shed. Suggesting that people shouldn't have the right to vote because they didn't vote how she wanted them to, is pretty fucking close to tyrannical.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 09:57 PM
3

The issue with this case was that once he came onto/into her, he gave her ownership of the sperm. So, you couldn't make her do that. Once it's hers you're fucked. I feel like the law should include intentions. A blowjob clearly does not mean you give consent to foster a child. We all should know that's not how pregnancies work, and such the expectations should be set accordingly.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 07:51 PM
1

I feel like I can't actually reply to the linked comment, stating how I feel like I wouldn't want to fight for a society that believes conscription. Am I being selfish? Should I, we, be allowed to be selfish? Am I really asking for more lives to be lost, just so that women are more equally represented amongst the memorials? Do I believe that men should receive privileges for conscription if they are they most vulnerable? I am not particularly privileged in my normal life. I have always sought to…
/r/MensRights10/02/14 04:36 AM
1

The idea of a status quo is already flawed. The supreme court held that we derive our freedoms and rights due to our responsibility to our country, with perhaps the most significant responsibility being conscription. It makes me deeply sad that it isn't one of feminists top priorities to achieve equality in this area. They have a much more significant voice on the topic, as they cannot be accused of looking out only for themselves. And yet, when you try and explain this to them, they tell you to…
/r/MensRights10/02/14 04:21 AM
2

I'm pretty sure you're supposed to make sure everyone is anon in these kinds of posts. I see an awful lot of names. Reddiquette's please don't: Post someone's personal information, or post links to personal information. This includes links to public Facebook pages and screenshots of Facebook pages with the names still legible.
/r/MensRights09/02/14 07:35 PM
1

Agreed. Forgot to add it to my post.
/r/MensRights09/02/14 07:27 PM
1

Very true.
/r/MensRights09/02/14 02:31 PM
4

Proof of identity. It makes the claims far less credible in my book. I was going to reply by saying she is probably one of the best people to make a point. One of MRA's biggest weakness is that we are men. Most women, hell even most people can just hand wave any MRA by saying "You're just acting in self interest/misogynistic." or something to that effect. When it is a women saying it, you can make people think twice. Even though it shouldn't, it can add trustworthiness to the topic.
/r/MensRights09/02/14 02:54 AM
13

I am disappointed, the OP in the original post still hasn't given proof. That said, any issue that is addressed, that focuses only on one gender/group, could so so so easily be made gender inclusive. There really isn't any excuse not to be all inclusive. Even if it might not affect you, one of the best ways of spreading knowledge is just to teach people.
/r/MensRights08/02/14 06:33 PM
1

I find this kind of sad. It seems like this was an attempt for the husband to better understand his wife. What's not to like about that?
/r/MensRights07/02/14 04:35 AM
1

Some of this scares me a little. So let’s recap: abandon the language of the court. Abandon your attachment to this violent institution. Stop thinking about “proof”, stop thinking about “innocence and guilt”. Just let it go. Does this person not understand that the court system is designed to protect us? That it was designed with ALL crime in mind, not just rape? I am a firm believer in the idea that as a society, it is better to have a guilty person walk free, rather than have an innocent perso…
/r/MensRights06/02/14 03:10 AM
3

The definition of feminism is "the belief that men and women should have equal rights and opportunities". There is actually two definitions for feminism. The quoted one, and the advocacy of women's rights on the grounds of political, social, and economic equality to men. This highlights an un-unified structure, and presents a lot of problems when you talk about the morality of feminists. I do agree with the spirit of feminists who say that they fight for equality, but I don't agree with the meth…
/r/MensRights13/12/13 10:58 AM
3

been utterly helpless while my attackers takes pleasure directly from my pain, suffering and humiliation. What about this doesn't occur in a beating? Especially in a gang beating?
/r/MensRights08/10/13 01:20 AM
1

Awww man, I was so pissed when one of the women in the comment said "I was raped. I said no, but when he said please, I said 'I guess'". Clearly men aren't the only ones who don't understand the definition of rape.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 12:21 PM
1

It is definitely an oversimplification. I think it is just a good tool to point out that the playing field really isn't as skewed as people might think. I had no idea that Limbaugh said something like that. I'm not surprised however. Saying that something is hard, and yet never actually having tried to do it, seems very hypocritical. If we want to talk about successful women, look at Mrs. Clinton. She ran for presidency! There really is no excuse for not trying. And at the very least, women tech…
/r/MensRights05/10/13 08:38 PM
1

In my psychology class we watched a program about identification of psychological disorders. One of the experiments they conducted was on self image. They had the participants resize a projected image of themselves (I believe this was the method they used) to try and to be a close to their actual body size as possible. I believe they cited that the average person estimates their body size to be 5-10% larger than it actually was. This might be an example of this behaviour! Or it may very well be …
/r/MensRights05/10/13 09:04 AM
1

Everything this person has said. Documentation should always win over hearsay. Preparation is the key to success.
/r/MensRights05/10/13 08:55 AM
1

What if it is a private school?
/r/MensRights05/10/13 08:49 AM
1

My form tutor taught us a very important lesson. If you are the victim of bullying (or in this case discrimination) you need to gather evidence. Make a log of her comments. Get dates, and times. If you can get your hands on one, get a tape recorder and record your lessons. It is very important that you don't tip yourself off. If she happens to find the tape recorder, tell her that your recording so that you can revise the lesson. I then suggest you send a recorded mail letter to your school boar…
/r/MensRights05/10/13 08:48 AM
9

Women are the majority in our country as well. You could make a very valid argument that they no longer have any excuse for any gender based institutional injustice.
/r/MensRights05/10/13 07:19 AM
2

That grammar is really bad right? I swear the first sentence implies they are actually against treating women like human beings? Doesn't there need to be a comma in there?
/r/MensRights29/08/13 08:11 PM
1

I want to preface this by saying I do not support /u/EastsTinyBaldBabies statement. My statement has nothing to do with gender. A 14 year old cannot give consent. I think you will find as a matter of fact, they can. Legally or otherwise. It is like saying a 14 year old can't shoot someone because they aren't allowed to own guns. We really need to consider what these people can and can't actually do. In this case, the judge appears to have ascertained that the 'victim' was not the subject of groo…
/r/MensRights29/08/13 08:02 PM
1

People like that guy are trying to tell us what actually happened. This way we can be properly informed, and can take appropriate reaction. But you are just a sensationalist, so this comment wont matter to you.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 08:01 PM
1

As a 14 year old, no matter how "willing" I was, I was immature and would have been pretty traumatised if something like this happened to me. Wait, so you would have been traumatised if you had sex willingly when you were 14? Granted, maybe your understanding of sex wasn't as 'sophisticated' as mine so that number could slide a little, but I would have been just fine. There really wouldn't have been too much difference as to when I actually had sex when I was 18.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 10:44 PM
4

If he acted like the father then he should take responsibilities of the father. Huh. Interesting. Very interesting. Then what about a 'dead-beat dad'? Should he have to pay alimony then?
/r/MensRights14/08/13 09:29 AM
1

I would love to read it if you be so kind. There is always someone who likes something you find annoying.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 09:22 AM
1

I'm sorry but it seems like you are trying to generalise your experience with your father to this situation as a whole. Believe me when I say most people would agree with you, your father is a fucking scumbag. And so is the judge and or court that passed gave him your mothers maternity money. If you can't separate the two, you should make a conscious decision to abstain from the argument. I can say from personal experience. A childs father is the male parent who choose to care for them to the be…
/r/MensRights07/07/13 11:07 AM
2

I have to agree. codebeards point is invalid as soon as he (I assume?) says court with an untrimmed beard We are not talking about not attempting to look professional, we are talking about working conditions. There is a far cry between the example codebeard gave and your objective. Change the example to Would you hire a lawyer who goes to court with an trimmed beard, wearing shorts, sandals and a dress shirt? It's different. And really, there is always the "Don't judge a book by the cover."
/r/MensRights07/07/13 10:40 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter