telperiontree Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	When I was in the Army this made me want to rip my hair out. I'm not the one saying decorated war veterans who served their country and in some cases gave life and limb spent their time in the military sucking cock. And telling you the fact that Kim is the only person to manually land a warthog intact and in possession of her life is not sexist. Saying that ten soldiers, two of which were women routed an enemy force five times larger than theirs, and gained Hester a silver star for valor in combat is not sexist. Pointing out a sniper who killed 300 in ten…	/r/MensRights	06/09/12 04:17 AM
1	When I was in the Army this made me want to rip my hair out. Yes, because the Silver Star doesn't have anything to do with valor in combat. Probably. Not sure what that has to do with competence, or a woman killing 300 nazis in less than a year... And you have never flown a Warthog. Nor did you read anything. She lost all her hydraulics - she lost steering and brakes. She had to switch to manual. Manual inversion, specifically. That's right – it is literally a series of wires tied to rudders and flaps that you manipulate by hand-cranking on cables, and no…	/r/MensRights	05/09/12 09:53 PM
1	When I was in the Army this made me want to rip my hair out. Sgtl Leigh Ann Hester might have something to say to you. She waspart of ten soldiers - two women, eight men - that beat the shit out of fifty insurgents that had ambushed a civilian convoy they were following. Said insurgents had RPGs, RPKs, and AK-47s, so it isn't like they were unprepared or something. This might be a better source for you. As might Lyudmila Pavlichenko, who killed over 300 Nazis. In about ten months. She would have killed more, but she took a mortar to the face and the sovie…	/r/MensRights	05/09/12 02:05 PM
2	When I was in the Army this made me want to rip my hair out. What the actual fuck.	/r/MensRights	05/09/12 12:04 AM
1	"Kid born in 1989, parents divorced in 2000, only to find through blood test that kid's father wasn't his bio-dad. That shouldn't matter, after ten years you have invested enough in the kid that you are said kid's father."... /politics is discussing rape, fathers rights, etc. I think I agree with what you're saying about the cuckolded man. If he doesn't have a fatherly relationship with the kid -only calls him up on weekends or whatever, then no, there isn't an issue with him walking away. Law changes that would make things easier and less contentious: Separate child support and visitation rights. If there was a bio-dad involved who didn't know about the kid, where the woman deceived both of them, all three parents should get visitation rights. Biological parents sho…	/r/MensRights	25/08/12 03:32 PM
1	"Kid born in 1989, parents divorced in 2000, only to find through blood test that kid's father wasn't his bio-dad. That shouldn't matter, after ten years you have invested enough in the kid that you are said kid's father."... /politics is discussing rape, fathers rights, etc. Ok, I think... so then it would maybe be a better analogy if we supposed that abortion didn't exist, and asked what the woman should do with the resulting baby? I would think that she should keep it, if at all possible. But I wouldn't be against her being able to give it away - like I am not against a paternity fraud victim walking away before the babe is six months old. So that still doesn't really work for me as a point? It isn't that the paternity fraud victim was chosen as the father that ma…	/r/MensRights	24/08/12 11:32 PM
0	"Kid born in 1989, parents divorced in 2000, only to find through blood test that kid's father wasn't his bio-dad. That shouldn't matter, after ten years you have invested enough in the kid that you are said kid's father."... /politics is discussing rape, fathers rights, etc. I'd assume that, and then I got downvoted to hell for some reason.	/r/MensRights	24/08/12 12:50 PM
1	"Kid born in 1989, parents divorced in 2000, only to find through blood test that kid's father wasn't his bio-dad. That shouldn't matter, after ten years you have invested enough in the kid that you are said kid's father."... /politics is discussing rape, fathers rights, etc. No... Lady raped a fourteen year old boy, was married, didn't tell hubby. They start divorce proceedings eleven years later, find out child isn't hubby's. the husband renounces all parental rights, leaving child fatherless. How is abandoning a child you loved and raised for ten/eleven years okay? He should divorce the rapist, of course, but abandoning the child like that is evil.	/r/MensRights	24/08/12 12:49 PM
1	"Kid born in 1989, parents divorced in 2000, only to find through blood test that kid's father wasn't his bio-dad. That shouldn't matter, after ten years you have invested enough in the kid that you are said kid's father."... /politics is discussing rape, fathers rights, etc. Problem, Fetus isn't a child. I'm actually the one who said what is in the title. If the father figures out it isn't his before the child forms an attachment - court law puts this at six months old - then yes, leave, get out. Aborting a bunch of cells is not the same thing as abandoning a ten year old child.	/r/MensRights	24/08/12 12:40 PM