TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

temp9876 Archive

View 0 posts and 107 comments by temp9876 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Uh, feminism is a CHOSEN IDEOLOGY, not a sex. ALL feminists share the 'men oppressed women for thousands of years' hatred of men. Every last fucking one of them. Anyone can call themselves a feminist, even if their ideology is completely ass backward from what feminism has always stood for. I could make all the same arguments about MRAs. Oh well. Haters gonna hate. You think what you want.
/r/MensRights22/10/11 05:09 AM
3

No, this is what some feminists look like. Saying this is like using an article where a man talks about beating is wife and saying "this is what a man looks like". Some women who call themselves feminists are horrible, evil, unconcionable bigots. But many women who call themselves feminists are as horrified about this as you are. You will probably be pleasantly surprised by the reaction this got in 2X or feminisms. Anyone can call themselves a feminist.
/r/MensRights21/10/11 04:27 AM
1

I actually have to defend the daycare, I think they took an appropriate stance to protect themselves and their staff and volunteers. A daycare should have a bathroom policy. That policy could end up being exactly the same as their practice (volunteers do it regardless of gender) has always been, but they should have a policy. If some crackpot parent like the woman who wrote this article decides to sue the preschool because she thinks they screwed up her kid letting a man help her in the bathroom…
/r/MensRights21/10/11 03:52 AM
1

Actually it is a good idea to reverse the order, lawyer first and then child psychologist. The reason is that a lawyer that specializes in family law will know which local psychologists the court prefers to use, and which ones he would prefer to work with on a case like this. A lawyer that specializes in this area will know if there are local practitioners with a tender years (children belong with their mothers) bias, and which ones have a good track record for picking up on conditioning. Take a…
/r/MensRights24/10/10 07:24 PM
10

No, please do post on that thread, because there are plenty of women who are reading without posting who genuinely don't know about the issues that men face and there is more to gain from adding your perspective than there is to lose.
/r/MensRights15/06/10 11:54 PM
1

But what exactly do you expect people to do? Should I quit my job and devote myself full time to fighting these evil people who call themselves feminists but think differently than I? No. I am not responsible for what they do and I will not stop calling myself a feminist because of the wrong headed actions of others that use the label any more than you expect Jews to stop calling themselves Jews because of Israel's actions. I speak out as best I'm able from the position I am in, but I will not d…
/r/MensRights15/06/10 01:13 AM
1

Not at all, 'Feminist' lobbyists and special interest groups do what they believe in, they aren't setting policy for anyone and certainly not on behalf of everyone else that uses the feminist label. There are plenty of subdivisions within feminism and many of us use more specific titles intentionally to differentiate. You can't blame all Jews for what Israel does.
/r/MensRights14/06/10 09:42 PM
2

Here is the thing: I am a feminist but I am also an accountant, not a lobbyist. I do not have the time or money to silence the people who do things I don't like with the feminist label. Just because they make a living out of their brand of feminism doesn't mean that they define what feminism is. It just means their brand of feminism gets more attention than mine. I could hold every Christian in America responsible for the WBC because they have failed to silence them, but it wouldn't be accurate …
/r/MensRights14/06/10 07:32 PM
1

Shared parenting laws need to be the standard everywhere, not because it will always be the best arrangement, but because mothers and fathers should at least start on equal footing when entering the process of deciding custody.
/r/MensRights14/06/10 06:46 PM
1

I agree, this is the great danger I see with the idea of the male abortion. It is hard to argue that fathers are equally as important as mothers while there are MRAs fighting for the right to walk away.
/r/MensRights14/06/10 06:35 PM
2

Thank you, I appreciate that.
/r/MensRights13/06/10 03:31 AM
17

I suppose I should beware the banhammer, but you know I'm going to keep right on disagreeing with you until it hits. There is more to be gained by the MR movement from hearing different views than from silencing them.
/r/MensRights12/06/10 06:12 PM
1

Hi Eddie! o/
/r/MensRights19/05/10 08:08 PM
1

So Inabook's point stands too =)
/r/MensRights19/05/10 07:53 PM
1

worth the wait though?
/r/MensRights19/05/10 07:41 PM
2

says the married guy
/r/MensRights19/05/10 07:27 PM
1

If you think so little of women, maybe you should be.
/r/MensRights19/05/10 07:25 PM
1

no evidence... except for two eye witnesses
/r/MensRights14/04/10 08:27 PM
2

This kind of nonsense is what guided the mainstream for ages, it is what sent women to the doctor's for 'hysteria'. It makes it easier for you to deal with people to assume that they are driven by this biological model, it makes you feel safe that you can rationalize their bad behavior. You are a fool, and you will never form a real connection with a woman as long as you cram her into this box. There is less than a fifteen percent chance that your marriage would end this way and you say that is …
/r/MensRights14/04/10 08:26 PM
3

I notice that you stopped at the 1/3, rather than the more accurate 85% chance that a marriage will not end this way. If your concern is with divorce law, we can chat about that, we will probably agree about most issues in that regard. However, your stated hypothesis on the behavior of women is not born out by the facts you claim. Perpetuating the belief that all women are like this only prevents you from treating people as equals, and forming meaningful relationships.
/r/MensRights14/04/10 07:08 PM
2

Of course, because we all know that if you don't call the police it didn't happen. You clearly have no knowledge of the dynamics of abusive relationships.
/r/MensRights14/04/10 07:01 PM
1

I can't decide if the worst part is your comment or the number of upvotes, or Kloo2yoo's response. That pattern could apply as easily to men as to women, because that is the behavior of a selfish asshole, not one gender or another. Honestly, it's just sad. If this is what you believe you are going to end up lonely and alone, and it is so unnecessary. The divorce stats don't support you either, because if 50% of marriages end in divorce and 2/3 of divorces are initiated by women then only one thi…
/r/MensRights14/04/10 04:41 PM
1

What's a man's purpose once you take out women and children? Why don't most men realize they're more disposable than women and do something about it? What is a woman's purpose once you take out men and children? We're animals, we reproduce sexually. That is the only reason that men are different from women: to facilitate sexual reproduction. If you don't want to reproduce then consider yourself a worker bee, go work, earn money, pay taxes, spend spend spend, which will give the economy a boost t…
/r/MensRights14/04/10 04:19 PM
2

I'm not one for violence, but if any[one] comes after me with a Samurai sword the only thing that's going to beat [them] to the emergency room are the lights on the ambulance taking [them].
/r/MensRights14/04/10 04:12 PM
3

I'll tell you what, I'll attack you with a butter knife and we'll see if I can do enough damage for you to press charges.
/r/MensRights14/04/10 04:11 PM
1

The quotes said she had five drinks of jungle juice as prepared by the frat house, that is not the same as five drinks, and yet the author completely discounts the possibility that the woman could be incapacitated. Before you defend the author, you should also have a look at what the author considers "pro sex literature": “Philosophy In the Bedroom” by the divine Marquis de Sade in case you are not familiar, here is an excerpt from wikipedia: "Madame de Mistival is soon stripped, beaten, whipped…
/r/MensRights02/04/10 05:06 PM
2

I couldn't tell you. That depends entirely on how drunk she is, the situation leading you to have sex with her, and your intentions. I think most reasonable people recognize when someone is just too drunk to know what they are doing, I know I've seen it, I'm sure you have too. Especially if someone has gotten them drunk intentionally so they could take advantage. I am not saying that if one party is sober while the other is drunk then it is rape, that would be unfair on so many levels (not to me…
/r/MensRights02/04/10 04:54 AM
3

An excellent question, and definitely a possibility. Now that is where it becomes interesting, personally, I think that if two parties are equally incapacitated, then neither can blame the other for the results. It is when only one party is incapacitated and that state is taken advantage of intentionally by another party (again, in my opinion) that rape should be under discussion. But I take issue with the quote from that article which you agreed with because it does not make any of these distin…
/r/MensRights02/04/10 01:59 AM
6

Of course it is, because that is the question when considering drunk sex: was s/he, or was s/he not incapacitated? It is unfair to assume that any alcohol consumption leaves the drinker incapacitated, but it is also unfair to assume that after five drinks the woman following the man to his room is not incapacitated. Since the distinction between drunk sex and rape is the distinction between intoxicated and incapacitated, it is precisely the topic of discussion. Also, before you agree with that a…
/r/MensRights02/04/10 01:45 AM
8

a situation in which they are no longer knowledgeable about their actions At a certain point intoxication is incapacitating.
/r/MensRights02/04/10 12:47 AM
8

Not to be a pest, but actually if you sign a contract while intoxicated to the point of incapacity and immediately disavow it once sober you are able to nullify the contract. Just saying.
/r/MensRights01/04/10 09:46 PM
7

My dad taught me that when someone hurts you, you hurt them back until they no longer pose a threat. What's good for the goose...
/r/MensRights01/04/10 05:04 AM
3

You're right, it hasn't always been this way. Many of the laws that are in place now are a remnant of a time when women did not have the option to support themselves and needed protection. Women are now capable of supporting themselves. The court system still reflects the old gender roles that men are providers while women are caretakers, even when that is not the case in the relationship. Knowing the reason why the laws are the way they are just makes it more obvious that they need to change. I…
/r/MensRights28/03/10 03:48 AM
14

The issue is not marriage in theory, the issue is what marriage has become. The theory is great, two people who love each other and are dedicated to spending their lives working together as partners make a vow before witnesses. That is not what marriage is anymore. I am married, I love being married, it is not what Disney told me it would be, it is not about romance it is not about passion. It is about having someone to share the burden of life with. The problem is not that people get married, t…
/r/MensRights27/03/10 01:57 AM
3

It is just an argument against tradition. I find it a little bit hypocritical when women insist on the 'traditional' engagement ring but not 'traditional' payment arrangements for the wedding.
/r/MensRights19/03/10 05:25 PM
2

No. She has the typical diamond engagement ring (1), a plain utilitarian wedding band for everyday use (2) a flashier diamond wedding band (3) and he has his single plain wedding band (4). My mother's wedding rings are of the same tradition, but my father got himself a little extra flash in his band, four rings in total.
/r/MensRights19/03/10 05:23 PM
6

2 months, 3 months, either way that is a horrific waste of cash.
/r/MensRights19/03/10 05:11 PM
6

We're working on it.
/r/MensRights13/03/10 07:44 AM
1

I suppose that's fair. His motivations are good, but it didn't seem like she enjoyed his responses any more than I did, which is why I replied in the first place. My original sarcastic comment was mostly just to point out the irony of what he was doing, he reacted by calling me sexist and I had a pot/kettle moment. Assuming that his condescension was unintentional, I am sorry for my comments.
/r/MensRights13/03/10 05:38 AM
1

He might not be a woman hater, but he was out of line on this one. She posted her experiences and views on equality and he started giving her advice even though he has been making off colour comments. Thats not cool, she didn't say anything wrong and he shouldn't have talked down to her like that.
/r/MensRights13/03/10 04:51 AM
5

It is many different movements that share the same name. The woman in this story is one of the crazy branches on the feminism tree. Real "mainstream" feminists are fit for social interaction.
/r/MensRights13/03/10 04:48 AM
2

You should come visit me sometime, I'll take you clubbing with all my girlfriends in my hometown. You can see that kind of reaction only mob style. There are women who make us look bad, they do this and call it feminism =(
/r/MensRights13/03/10 04:46 AM
1

I disagree: well obviously it isn't well-reasoned, they are feminists.
/r/MensRights12/03/10 09:44 PM
1

Oh, see I just thought you were being condescending since she made a far better argument for equality than anything I've seen from you in this thread.
/r/MensRights09/03/10 12:51 AM
-1

HAH. Knew you couldn't deliver.
/r/MensRights09/03/10 12:50 AM
4

I have never claimed to embrace feminism in it's entirety, I only claim that my ideology, and that of all the other equality minded women out there, has as much right to the title as anyone else, and more because we are following the ideals of equality on which feminism is theoretically founded. I am not them. Nor are the many other women who are aware of what we owe to the feminist movement who would like to see equality.
/r/MensRights09/03/10 12:49 AM
0

The 'feminist' lobbies, who says they are feminist lobbies? Who says they get to define and restrict the rest of us? Them? You? To denounce 'feminism' in it's entirety is to deny women the vote, deny us education, the ability to hold jobs, run for office, testify against our abusers or tell our husband's no.
/r/MensRights08/03/10 10:46 PM
4

congratulations. you had a good experience. Yes I did, and I'm not the only one. Feminism is a women's movement so it is up to us what we make of it and what it becomes. This is what we are making of it, but we are being attacked by people who won't let us move past the previous generation's choices. There are a lot of angry woman haters wearing the MR badge, but being a reasonable person I still assume that MR is an equality movement, why can't modern feminists get the same treatment?
/r/MensRights08/03/10 10:12 PM
6

That's so tragic, there are a lot of women who don't identify as feminist because of that legacy. The course I took is much more in line with equality and 'gender studies' even though it is still labelled women's studies. We looked at the various waves and branches of feminism but we examined both the motivations of the writing and the fallacies in the arguments. I took the course after I became interested in father's rights so I was frequently the first to point out an unfair stereotype but my …
/r/MensRights08/03/10 09:37 PM
1

Awesome! Most people I talk to have very little actual knowledge about the movement. I had an excellent program so I'm curious, was your faculty just overrun with second wave holdouts? Did you cover LGBT issues or men's rights at all?
/r/MensRights08/03/10 08:32 PM
-1

Show me a "feminist" who gives the slightest shit about problems men face (except for when prompted by a question like this), and I'll show you Venus and Mars attempting to have sex on the far side of the Sun. Now pics or GTFO
/r/MensRights08/03/10 08:12 PM
0

yeah you listen here little lady, let a man tell you how it works
/r/MensRights08/03/10 08:10 PM
4

You discovered this in your own academic study of feminism? I mean, you wouldn't make a claim like this without having actually sat in the classroom and heard for yourself what is taught and the discussion had around it... right?
/r/MensRights08/03/10 07:55 PM
-1

Thank you for so perfectly illustrating why there is not point having this conversation.
/r/MensRights08/03/10 07:38 PM
2

I studied the feminist movement academically, and your last statement there is exactly the kind of thing I would love to clear up but it really doesn't sound like anyone is interested in it. My husband had a child from a previous relationship, court was torture and it is what initially got me interested in men's rights. But knowing what I do about what I owe to feminism (like the right not to be raped by my husband, or to testify against him if he beats me, or the right to vote, run for politica…
/r/MensRights08/03/10 03:25 PM
4

It feels kinda like pounding your head against the wall doesn't it.
/r/MensRights08/03/10 03:15 PM
2

right, so it's ok as long as you don't say it to their faces?
/r/MensRights08/03/10 06:09 AM
8

I'm curious, 'feminism' has a bad rep and perhaps some of that is deserved because there are horrible things that have been done in the name of 'feminism'. I have studied 'feminism' and also been through a custody battle from a man's perspective, so I see both sides of the coin to some degree. Would anyone be interested in hearing what current feminism is about? I feel like a lot of the time the word itself is thrown around inappropriately, the rare hateful people who have used it are being used…
/r/MensRights08/03/10 06:07 AM
5

pro tip, avoid comments like: well obviously it isn't well-reasoned, they are feminists. If you would actually like women to listen that is.
/r/MensRights08/03/10 05:55 AM
7

His legal rights will be very different depending on your location. It is really really important that he does take legal action to stop this though, once a pattern is established it is harder to change the status quo. Having been through it, my advice would be to call whatever authority you went through for child support and ask them who you should talk to or how you can get legal assistance. You might have better luck getting answers if you make the calls instead of your fiance. It is a hard f…
/r/MensRights04/03/10 01:03 AM
1

I agree, shared should absolutely be the default.
/r/MensRights03/03/10 09:20 PM
0

Custodial and non-custodial parenting is not always avoidable, and I never said the rest of it. Are you disagreeing with me just to be disagreeable?
/r/MensRights03/03/10 08:10 PM
2

Its a great argument, I just can't see how it could be put in place practically. I'm in Canada and our family law has seen some really great changes in the last few years. The primary issue at this point are the assumptions held by the people making custody orders about gender roles in the family. The wording of the laws are quite fair, the flaw is in the application. Unfortunately, changing the law won't be able to prevent the biases of Judges, Lawyers, mediators etc. There are some great progr…
/r/MensRights03/03/10 07:59 PM
3

See, and THAT is an issue that you and I can agree on.
/r/MensRights03/03/10 07:44 PM
0

She is still taking care of his kids, and now without his support for 3am nightmares and bouts of the flu. Unpaid labour has value too. I'm not arguing that dad should pay for a giant house for mom and the kids while he lives in his parent's basement, I'm saying that dad shouldn't live in a giant house while mom and the kids live in a crappy one bedroom apartment. But dad can't give the kids a nice place to live without giving the mother a better place than she could otherwise afford (still with…
/r/MensRights03/03/10 07:31 PM
-2

She is still taking care of his kids, and now without his support for 3am nightmares and bouts of the flu. Unpaid labour has value.
/r/MensRights03/03/10 07:23 PM
2

Why is it that when a poor black woman in the projects gets a public welfare check we deride her as a welfare queen I don't do that, that's a pretty sick thing to say.
/r/MensRights03/03/10 07:22 PM
0

Sort of, and yes. I think I replied to you in a different spot on this. The goal is to have a fair system, right? The goal is to affect change? Then the goal is to be heard. That is punitive and "not fair". I call this slavery. This attitude is divisive, there are people for whom the system has worked, there was a time when it was a huge step forward for human rights. If we deny that, if we are combative, and selfish, then the people with the power to affect change will not listen to us. If we m…
/r/MensRights03/03/10 07:03 PM
1

I agree completely, but scrapping the family law system completely and starting over isn't feasible. If we understand why a rule exists then we can attack it logically from the source. Child support and alimony are built on the belief that women nurture the children while men provide financially, that is what has to change first. Fathers need to be recognized as equal caregivers, Mothers need to be recognized as capable of earning income. Following that, custody should not automatically default …
/r/MensRights03/03/10 06:38 PM
1

You clearly don't understand the value of unpaid labour, which is why you can't understand the theory behind the system. The system is deeply flawed yes, but not entirely for the reasons you think. The treatment of alimony and child support as punitive is how some people use it, but it is not inherently part of the system. It is about responsibility, slavery is just one twisted by product.
/r/MensRights03/03/10 06:28 PM
0

But the kids' quality of life is affected by what mom can afford, the two are not separated. If there is a good reason why the mother has custody (obviously this is not typically the case, but I'm talking theoretically) then the place where the children live should be nicer than what mom alone can afford. The custodial parent (in theory) provides more to the children's quality of life by non-financial means, the non-custodial parent provides more for the quality of life through financial means. …
/r/MensRights03/03/10 06:21 PM
-1

The thinking is more like if he makes a lot of money his kids should have a better quality of life for it.
/r/MensRights03/03/10 05:21 PM
-1

The system was designed for a time when women's labour was unpaid. It was to prevent women from being too economically dependent on their husbands to be able to leave. The amounts are always intended to be fair, the system just hasn't evolved with the family unit.
/r/MensRights03/03/10 05:15 PM
5

Accountability for minor expenses can be incredibly difficult though. I would like to see a less cash based system, where the custodial parent could register expenses for which the non custodial parent is responsible, or the support is paid to the agency and the custodial parent receives the benefit in a non cash form similar to food stamps that has limited applications.
/r/MensRights03/03/10 05:09 PM
3

Agreed. I think there is value in examining some of the old feminist theories though, if for no other reason than pointing out what was wrong with it. Some of the seventies stuff can lead to amazing conversations. The is equality possible while only women can carry babies? discussion has always been a favourite of mine. Always hypothetical of course!
/r/MensRights03/03/10 06:23 AM
4

Actually there have been some radical feminists who wrote about eliminating sexual reproduction because they argued that the power imbalance created by the way humans reproduce is reflected in society. Its a fascinating theory, similar to Marxist theory but women are the labour force that controls reproduction, while men seek to control reproduction by controlling women. But the point of the theory is not to eliminate men per se, just to eliminate sexual reproduction as a means of oppression. Ho…
/r/MensRights02/03/10 08:51 PM
1

There is a difference between inappropriate sexual comments/looks and sexual harassment. By the sound of it there has been no harassment in this case Um, what? Someone needs another round of sensitivity training!! Most of those responses were surprisingly appropriate!
/r/MensRights02/03/10 04:22 PM
4

Your logic is flawed. If: Because of the fact that you have [the legal means to ruin me], I get the absolute right to put it all upon you and other women who get the benefit and abuse it. Then: Because of the fact that you have [the physical ability to harm me], I get the absolute right to put it all upon you and other men who get the benefit and abuse it. You've assumed that because I'm a woman I abuse my power (the legal means to ruin you), which is precisely the same argument that says that b…
/r/MensRights02/03/10 05:19 AM
4

Except that I'm not stereotyping men, I'm mocking YOU. You don't represent men in general. In fact based on this whole 'angry woman hater' persona you've got going, you're actually an embarrassment to men. You are the stereotype that oppresses decent people. Or at least this online persona of yours is. I replied sarcastically to you blaming the women of reddit for the men's rights issues. You've got no call to put all that shit on us, you're not doing your cause any favors speawing that hate. If…
/r/MensRights02/03/10 03:58 AM
10

The thing that you seem to be missing is that I don't need your permission to advocate for men's rights, and you're respect isn't worth anything if it requires someone to be as hateful as you. By the way, you are not all men. I said YOU sound unstable. You are going on and on about 'my type' and my 'sisters', but whine that you get stereotyped. You can't blame me for feminism, although you are determined to try, but I'll admit, I do enjoy the right to vote or testify against my husband if he bea…
/r/MensRights02/03/10 03:03 AM
7

"features" you and your kind have given to men should be put upon you Get over yourself, I wasn't even alive for the feminist movement. So you don't hate all women, just women that aren't systematically oppressed by their governments? Really? Are you even listening to yourself? How can you demand that women not pigeonhole men while pigeonholing women? Do you not even see how hypocritical that is? You don't want equality, you want a punching bag. I've got news for you, that isn't going to earn yo…
/r/MensRights02/03/10 02:19 AM
8

wtf man, why should anyone step up to help you? All you are doing is spewing bile at me based purely on the fact that I lack a penis, without knowing anything of my politics or personal situation. You have no idea whether or not I protest feminist policies, you have no idea if I work against this issue or correct my [they're not my sisters]. I did not begin a thread by disparaging half the world's population in a single blow. Have you ever considered that some of those injustices being perpetrat…
/r/MensRights02/03/10 01:56 AM
6

Naw, see I came to post something in support of mens rights because I'm a woman that supports men's rights but I enjoyed you pigeonholing me so much I decided to go post some misandry on another subreddit. I wish for you every injustice of which the system is capable. Pull your head out of your ass and stop making enemies of the people who would like to be on your side.
/r/MensRights02/03/10 12:51 AM
4

Thats awesome! I love being reduced to an unfair stereotype!
/r/MensRights02/03/10 12:03 AM
1

Now thats just tragic, taking evidence contrary to your argument and calling it trolling doesn't make you right. If you are going to argue using statistics, learn how they work.
/r/MensRights01/03/10 07:49 PM
1

I did not say domestic violence, I said male on female violence, which includes all violent acts in or out of a relationship. If your premise is correct and male's are biologically hardwired so that they are incapable of not acting to protect any uterus, then there could not be ANY male on female violence (any being a statistically significant amount). You have conveniently excluded the relationships where there was reciprocal violence, which means that using your study of the 24% of relationshi…
/r/MensRights01/03/10 06:56 AM
0

At the same time (from the wife of a MAN who has custody) if we're talking equality, what is the price tag on being the one to wake up at 3am with nightmares and clean up puke?
/r/MensRights28/02/10 05:38 AM
0

Why did you feel the need to quote in the first place? Reading comprehension is a wonderful thing. Yeah, presumptuous. By the way, if you would cool down your penis rage for a bit you would see that I didn't say she was completely wrong, I said she wasn't entirely right and that using weak arguments undermines her point. Your kids, husband, anyone you dated didn't have smeg because they bathe everyday and clean their penis, more carefully than they would have to if they had no foreskin. As I sai…
/r/MensRights27/02/10 06:51 PM
-2

No you corrected me, so I fixed it for you. Don't quote bad grammer and tell me to work on my reading comprehension if you don't want to be corrected yourself. Why exactly are you getting so uptight at me? You don't have a penis, neither do I, I was just pointing out that there are hygiene issues that come along with a foreskin. Maybe you just don't understand what I'm talking about because you haven't changed any circumcised boys? Either way, shouldn't it be men having this debate rather than u…
/r/MensRights27/02/10 06:59 AM
-2

Ahh I see what you did there, I misunderstood, no nead to be insulting. I find it hard to believe that none of your sons had enough excess skin to act as a poop trap but I'll take your word for it. Of course, there is always the possibility that you didn't notice since you bathed them each time. Also it is worth noting, that we are still both women having this conversation about an appendage neither of us has. Our area hospitals no longer allow the procedure on premises, you need to take your so…
/r/MensRights27/02/10 04:33 AM
3

the key phrase there is 'minimum', if you keep reading: nine years, but that is the mandatory minimum term on what could end up being a life sentence. How much time Wellington serves above the minimum term will depend on his rehabilitation while behind bars. The state's Indeterminate Sentence Review Board will decide his release date based on his treatment in prison.
/r/MensRights27/02/10 04:02 AM
-4

You need to take your son home & schedule a consult with a urologist. um, no I don't, he's fine, what are you talking about? The foreskin like any other crevice needs special care when cleaning. A swipe with a wipe will not cut it. That doesn't mean you have to fully retract the foreskin, but it does mean you sometimes have to clean inside. Point being, the foreskin does require extra maintenance, and claiming that it doesn't undermines the rest of her argument.
/r/MensRights27/02/10 03:55 AM
0

Has he had a new trial? All I read was that he plead not guilty but changed it to a plea of guilty in exchange for a sentance of probation only at the request of the prosecution to spare the victim a trial, the judge then refused to honor the plea bargain at which point Polanski fled the country. If my facts are in error please correct me, but being tricked into pleading guilty doesn't over ride 'innocent until proven guilty' for me, which is why I reserve judgment.
/r/MensRights27/02/10 02:36 AM
-3

Does it bother anyone else that this is yet another very polemic article on circumcision by a woman? I am neither for nor against circumcision, it is the social norm where I'm at but they make you pay to have it done ($200!) so my oldest is and my youngest is not. Everyone has really strong opinions one way or another but I really don't feel like anyone is 100% right in their arguments. For example: And people make the mistake of thinking that they have to retract the foreskin to keep it clean. …
/r/MensRights27/02/10 01:56 AM
3

I try to reserve judgment on people who have not had the opportunity to defend themselves in court, so that example just doesn't work for me.
/r/MensRights27/02/10 01:28 AM
2

I agree it's sick, at least this one is going to jail and registering as a sex offender. It's probably because he was so young, if he had been sixteen it would have gone way way easier for her.
/r/MensRights26/02/10 11:28 PM
5

oh there was definately a pussy pass, if a 36 year old man had sex with a 12 year old girl while she was drunk and then continued to have sex with her nearly 200 times, marking each one with a star in his diary and buying her gifts to make her compliant, the man would be institutionalized, whether jail or an asylum that man would never see the light of day.
/r/MensRights26/02/10 11:24 PM
18

The jail sentence is a step in the right direction though, and she was put on the sex offender registry. It's pretty gross though that she called it rape but no one else did, and even worse that the judge accepted that it was a one time thing when she knew the first time was rape, what is that all about? Can't imagine what papers he read that convinced him otherwise.
/r/MensRights26/02/10 04:15 PM
8

I would be offended too. It's telling someone that you don't trust them and that you will never trust them, there is nothing they can ever do to earn your trust. That they must constantly be supervised and prevented from facing choices about right or wrong because they are not capable of making the right decision. It also takes credit for you being a good person/boy/kid by denying that you were responsible for the actions that made you a good person/boy/kid. It isn't something I would ever say t…
/r/MensRights23/02/10 01:59 AM
1

I'm claiming you can't have it both ways. IF men are as incapable of controlling their protective instincts as you claim, why is there male on female violence? Your argument should preclude the occurrence of male on female violence entirely because if your theory were correct, in the commission of an act of violence the male reptile brain would revert to evolutionary programming and act to protect the uterus. This is not the case, your logic is faulty.
/r/MensRights22/02/10 11:44 PM
1

Sounds like you want to have your cake and eat it too, I wonder why none of the men in Pte. Smith's unit threw their bodies on top of her when they came under fire...
/r/MensRights22/02/10 06:57 PM
2

This isn't a matter for belief... But this isn't an opinion question Then please provide citations for your arguments. running into enemy fire doesn't seem much of a stretch why are you giving credence to the belief that men are biologically inclined to protect women without recognizing the natural instinct for survival? It's just the way it is Yeah? Well this is just the way it is too.
/r/MensRights22/02/10 06:23 PM
3

You assign value to the two different contributions of mother and father in raising a child, the same is true of men and women in combat. If you assume that men and women have some inherant biological differences then it follows naturally that each can make different contributions in combat. Your argument depends on the male brain being unable to comprehend a woman as anything other than a uterus. If that were true then it would apply equally to the family dynamic. But as you demonstrated, it do…
/r/MensRights22/02/10 06:13 PM
1

By your logic, we should stick with the product of evolution that says you should go get a job and pay your xwife to raise the kids you never get to see. Evolution isn't done yet. Things have to change.
/r/MensRights22/02/10 04:06 PM
2

I see your point, she says she told him explicitly more than once, that she did not want to have sex. If you give her the benefit of the doubt (which I am inclined to do) then it was rape because he was aware that she did not consent and penetrated her anyway. If she was not as clear as she claims... well then you could possibly make a case for it being a tragic misunderstanding.
/r/MensRights20/02/10 04:10 AM
1

If there is any question of paternity then the child's best interests are already pretty screwed up. The law needs to recognize that there can be more than two parents and that the privileges of paternity don't have to be purchased any more than a mother's rights depend on her paycheck.
/r/MensRights20/02/10 03:38 AM
5

Upvote for you. I think the article has it all wrong, men who take responsibility for contraception are dead sexy.
/r/MensRights19/02/10 01:26 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter