TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

tempaccountnamething Archive

View 0 posts and 34 comments by tempaccountnamething on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
11

Every click she gets from someone who is annoyed at the video is still a click that adds to her view count. It's the Howard Stern model. Like it or hate it, people are listening.
/r/MensRights09/07/18 03:05 PM
2

"He/him pronouns"
/r/MensRights06/07/18 03:22 PM
4

Is he? He kissed her?
/r/PussyPassDenied11/06/18 08:26 PM
63

Oh. It wasn't the bombing that did it on its own. It's that her whole world view just got torn down. She is making a documentary about how women are funny and that the only thing holding her back from being a successful comedian is the discrimination she faces as a woman. Her whole world fell apart in that moment and she was forced to face the reality that her failures are her own and not because of society. I actually applaud the courage it took to release the video and not just destroy it.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/06/18 05:31 PM
55

No. She set out to prove that there is a social bias against women comedians. And she (apparently) gets more laughs as a woman than as a man. So, by her own experiment, she provided evidence that her hypothesis was not correct.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/06/18 05:23 PM
124

Funniest part of the video was the guy desperately trying to console her.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/06/18 05:19 PM
2

Yes. I think ignoring this problem only lets it fester.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 04:48 PM
14

The female remake phenomenon is easy to explain: It's because it's easy. It's way easier to take a movie swap the genders, add a few new jokes specific to the swap, and sell it. It was already a successful movie so you know it's "good" and the brand name means it costs less to advertise. They've been trying it for years, but audiences always rejected them. If they become successful, expect all the reboots to be gender swapped. Hell, even the soft reboots are gender swapped... Force Awakens was b…
/r/MensRights05/06/18 08:35 PM
2

I know. It just seemed like a reasonable jumping off point to talk about how Joe Rogan said his dick didn't work for a decade...
/r/MensRights22/05/18 11:49 PM
4

Listen to Joe Rogan talk about it. He was on hair loss drugs and it made his mood fall to shit and his dick stop working. It's your choice, but if you choose to risk impotence because of hair loss that seems like the worse option to me. I think the point of this post though is that there seems to be a pretty serious double-standard about shaming. But... like he gives a shit though. He's married to a 10, hair loss and all.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 03:49 PM
6

If the event is truly random then you would expect it to be equally distributed across the population. This is the classic, "World destroyed by meteor; women most affected" headline.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 03:46 PM
23

This is fake right? It's designed to get people to google "penis facial"?
/r/MensRights17/05/18 05:44 PM
8

This is just a photo with some text on it. There is no evidence this is real. Don't upvote unverified bullshit.
/r/MensRights17/05/18 01:40 PM
11

Well... If you believe Jordan Peterson, the OHRT is infested with SJWs and is "corrupt". I'm not so sure... But I guess this would be a pretty impressive test of Peterson's claims.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 02:17 AM
21

The "equality index" only penalizes the score when women do worse. Women are 48% of university students? Not equal. Women are 85% of university students? Perfect equality. Women's life expectancy is 3 days less than men? Not equal. Women's life expectancy is 15 years longer than men? Perfect equality.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 03:35 AM
5

Indeed. If it were the other way around, they would be complaining that men were getting special treatment by being the special case... that it "privileges" men above women.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 11:58 PM
4

This is the same policy he used with the Toronto scissors hijab attack, and look where that got him... Horribly embarrassed. The true answer to any of these sorts of complicated and nuanced issues is: it is complicated and no "one size fits all" blanket solution is going to cover all cases.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 03:44 PM
4

If the raw data is based on self-reporting then it may all be down to a willingness to report unhappiness and mental health problems.
/r/MensRights15/12/17 02:21 PM
36

These things are generated by an algorithm. This is the same as the ridiculous "she invented / he invented controversy" that everyone freaked out about a few years ago. It's nice to have an illustration that cuts both ways, though. Basically, in the same way that "she invented" showed that there is much more written about things that have been invented by men, this "correction" shows there is much more written about ads undermining women.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 02:58 AM
1

Remember that this is just a random self post. Don't be disrespectful and discuss the situation. But also view any claims presented without evidence with an appropriate amount of skepticism.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 05:40 PM
-1

Yup. This is just the "he invented" controversy again. Everyone was rolling their eyes about that one around here. You don't get to do that and whine about this without being a hypocrite. I only accept this image as a juxtaposition of the "he invented" controversy... and even then it's not impressive.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 04:08 PM
2

It's my understanding that in much of the North American vernacular, "girl" is used as an equivalent to "guy". So you might say, "Welcome to kindergarten, boys and girls." But you would also say, "Going out with the girls tonight," in the same way you would say, "Meeting the guys for beers."
/r/MensRights30/03/17 04:07 PM
138

Hopefully they can "increase diversity" by hiring more even more women. 68% women is pretty diverse. But with hard work and a lot of identity politics, I'm pretty sure that we can get that number up to perfect diversity at 100% women.
/r/MensRights25/11/16 07:51 PM
2

Okay. Then fine. That's my point. Then you have to use all those factors. It's absolutely not fair to only target men when it's politically correct but then not use those other factors. So if you are willing to block men then you also have to be willing to use race and religion to judge people in all aspects of life. All I'm asking for is consistency from people on this issue. Somehow I doubt that the Canadian prime minister is willing to agree to racial profiling or discrimination on the basis …
/r/MensRights19/12/15 07:28 PM
6

I see you are wandering into that territory... Let me answer your question with a rhetorical question: Would it be fair to judge people based on other demographic information? Should we be allowed to profile people based on race?
/r/MensRights19/12/15 05:00 PM
37

See Also: Tashfeen Malik, the female shooter in the most recent American terror attack.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 07:45 AM
9

Consider all the efforts to block men's centres and men's speakers on college campuses. They say that men don't ask for help and don't support one another. But they block the attempts of men to give help to one another. They protest men helping one another.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 06:16 AM
23

She was definitely in the movie less than her co-stars. Someone did the math and she made more than Cooper and Bale based on hours worked.
/r/MensRights23/10/15 07:26 PM
67

And the fact that Ronda Rousey is the top paid athlete in the "macho" UFC... because her fights generate the most revenue for the organization. Actors don't get paid based on how good they are at acting. They are paid based on how much their management can negotiate for, which is based on how much money the actor brings to the movie's bottom line. As Rousey said, the UFC doesn't pay her the most because they're doing something nice because she's a woman... she earned the fact that she is the top…
/r/MensRights23/10/15 07:22 PM
148

If we are making "millionaire actors" the new battleground for pay equality, let's include models and adult film actors... both fields where women out-earn men by a very significant margin.
/r/MensRights23/10/15 07:03 PM
58

Those are totally misleading headlines. "Renner says 'it's not my job' to help female co-stars secure equal pay" That's not what he said. He said it's "not his job" to deal with negotiating contracts. He said that he is just a performer and he leaves the negotiating to his management. And he also says that he supports equal pay for women. He wasn't saying "it's not his job" to help. He was saying that he doesn't deal with the money side of things. It literally is not part of his career. It's utt…
/r/MensRights23/10/15 07:00 PM
32

I can't think of a better example of the intersection of confirmation bias, sexism, and irrelevance that epitomizes social justice-style feminism than these male portmanteaus - mansplain, manspread, manslam.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 10:17 PM
2

It seemed like it the article had a lot more to do with how the reporter felt rather than her actually being treated differently. I didn't see any evidence presented other than the fact that she felt like more people were glaring at her. Oh... And the one guy who took a picture of her "manspreading"? You mean like all the photos that the author posted at the start of the video that were taken of men who do the same thing? Sort of hypocritical to identify the problem using photos taken of men on …
/r/MensRights06/01/15 10:26 PM
57

Yeah, except for the softball interview that Colbert had with Anita Sarkeesian. Wtf was that?
/r/MensRights22/12/14 06:00 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter