TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

tempthrowanon Archive

View 0 posts and 10 comments by tempthrowanon on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

Well I made a comment on their site and refered to it as infant circumcision, and they replied indicating they support it as a "parental choice". I dont think there is any doubt they are supporting INFANT circumcision. Go here: https://www.facebook.com/PPNHAF look to the left of the page where it says "posts to page" (you need to scroll down just a little)
/r/MensRights19/02/15 01:30 AM
7

looks like they might be removing comments, check to see if yours is still there. update: actually at the second link they are leaving posts and responding. They are defending their position on it being a parental choice and STD prevention. PLease go there and post!! It is a good oppurtunity to enlighten them.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 08:37 PM
11

if anyone feels like it, you could make comments on their facebook page, and point out their hypocrisy: https://www.facebook.com/PlannedParenthood and here is another planned parenthood FB page specifically for New Hamshire: https://www.facebook.com/PPNHAF edited to correct links * please MRAs go to the second link now! and look to left of page "post to page" and please leave responses. Planned Parenthood is responding and trying to defend their position.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 07:50 PM
1

are you asking about being tricked into having sex, or tricked into conceiving? I think society always expects people to know the risk of conceiving when they have sex.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 06:22 AM
-13

He won the lottery while they were married (community property) and they divorced 20 year later. Who knows how much of the winnings were left. If the situation had been reversed, say they were married and she won, any winnings would belong to him as well.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 08:58 PM
1

Besides, as long as he is on birth certificate, which I presume he is, he could just walk into any private clinic and had it done. No permission is needed.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 05:56 PM
1

I agree with Karissa. There was no excuse for Elam to not find out if the kids were biologically his or not. I think he wanted to have the excuse of "I dont know for sure" and he did not want that excuse to slip away if the tests came out positive.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 05:51 PM
2

I have read two articles. The original one, and then Elam's response. The wife claims she never cheated, so you only have his word against her's. She claims she was raped by a black man around the time of conception, but the child is obviously full caucasion. Paul was legally married to mother and on the birth certificate. he could have a paternity test done at any time. No permission is necessary. I believe birds of a feather flok together. This is the woman he chose to wed and be the mother to…
/r/MensRights11/02/15 05:19 PM
4

Just to be clear he did not need his wives permission to get a DNA test. The $1200 was back child support, the amount set by the court, there was no "settling" by his wife as the court determines the amount and demands that he pay. His wife was also pregnant with his other child. By all acounts to me he looks like a dead beat dad.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 05:42 AM
6

I'm getting a different vibe than you,OP, and I dont feel like the journalist was vague or skirted around issues at all. The jouranlists looked at court records and has quotes of Elam's own words and writings and even approached Elam for his side and gave him a chance to refute any claims by his ex and his daughter. What else do you expect from a journalist? How else would one fact check?
/r/MensRights06/02/15 06:39 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter