TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ten_ton_hammer Archive

View 0 posts and 23 comments by ten_ton_hammer on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
26

Women loathe a harmless man.
/r/MensRights23/09/23 10:14 PM
7

Men don't because only 30% of us reproduce, it's dog eat dog. Women do because the majority of them do reproduce, therefore they're mostly in it together.
/r/MensRights23/05/23 06:27 AM
12

Exactly. If you have no investment in society why struggle?
/r/MensRights03/11/22 12:34 PM
11

I think a lot of women resent their husbands for not being rich prince charming and take it out on them over the course of the relationship like this. The traditional marriage only works cause the guy is rich and can provide the lifestyle.
/r/MensRights09/06/22 03:51 PM
18

But there are a lot of single mothers having the babies of the men who are fucking, suckling welfare off the government teat.
/r/MensRights30/04/19 08:16 PM
25

The trouble is not only do we have to deter rapists, we also have to deter people from using the legal system as a bludgeon against other people falsely. Both are abhorrent acts, and should be a legal liability. I couldn't condone weakening legal consequences for either behavior.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 10:55 AM
31

It's not binary, often someone can be guilty of something, and they aren't convicted because there's not enough evidence. It falls into a grey space where you can only put someone in jail if the court has enough evidence to do so. Therefore even though the case may not succeed, it doesn't mean the person who brought the charges against them was lying. The cost of not having innocent people in prison is that sometimes guilty people go free.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 10:49 AM
55

They won't go to jail, or necessarily be charged if they lose the initial rape case, only if they get convicted of false report, which is subject to the same standard of proof 'beyond reasonable doubt'.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 10:35 AM
3

I'd rather take care of someone than die.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 03:36 AM
3

It's not as if men don't have to deal with hormones of their own. Testosterone is a hell of a thing.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 11:27 AM
5

Men are encouraged to be heroes from an early age.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 03:59 AM
1

Apex fallacy.
/r/MensRights02/09/16 11:02 AM
1

That was really good
/r/MensRights31/07/16 12:32 AM
4

I'll take care of a woman if she takes care of me. Taking care of your man gets labeled 'sexism' these days though, as most woman want things their way and only their way.
/r/MensRights30/05/16 09:09 AM
4

It was a very interesting article. Especially when it outlined how the people looking to insinuate themselves into and change the nerd culture do so by exploiting the insecurity and crave for validation already existent in its members.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 12:27 PM
1

Because inflicting a sexual act on a woman is still seen as 'harming' or reducing her in value to a certain extent. It's ridiculous.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 07:28 PM
1

Sending signals and wearing sexually provocative clothing are all invitations for a "move", not an overt move in and of themselves.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 06:06 PM
1

Jesus someone drunk enough that they don't know what they're doing but still look and act enthusiastic and well put together is nightmare fuel.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 04:51 AM
1

Have to protect yourself.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 06:53 AM
3

The thing is though, police also have discretion, which means if it's blindingly obvious that he didn't do the crime they can choose not to pursue it and waste the court's time.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 08:25 AM
1

Well that's pretty shitty if so.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 08:49 AM
3

I'm not sure how it is in American Law, but it might be very likely that by the act of physically restraining you they were placing you under arrest according to the law - depriving you of your liberty. There are very specific conditions under which police are allowed to do this so they don't abuse their power. One is to stop the continuance of an offence, another is to ensure ID is obtained from a reluctant offender, and to ensure all parties remain safe. None of these seem to apply. You should…
/r/MensRights13/07/13 05:28 AM
2

Brohug man, I have thought this often. I always come back to the same place, women blaming men for eliciting negative emotions, without realizing the only ones who should be in control of their feelings are they themselves.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 02:17 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter