TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

tenchineuro Archive

View 45 posts and 19,923 comments by tenchineuro on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1024

Anti-MRMtenchineuro/r/MensRights11/01/19 06:50 PM
366

False Accusationtenchineuro/r/MensRights29/04/19 07:07 PM
195

Generaltenchineuro/r/MensRights01/01/22 03:13 AM
164

Edu./Occu.tenchineuro/r/MensRights30/08/18 11:44 PM
120

Discriminationtenchineuro/r/MensRights25/08/21 05:05 PM
118

Social Issuestenchineuro/r/MensRights03/11/19 02:57 AM
85

Humourtenchineuro/r/MensRights06/04/20 06:18 PM
83

Edu./Occu.tenchineuro/r/MensRights11/04/19 07:30 PM
60

Legal Rightstenchineuro/r/MensRights10/08/19 10:52 PM
53

Generaltenchineuro/r/MensRights10/12/21 01:14 AM
52

Edu./Occu.tenchineuro/r/MensRights30/07/25 01:09 AM
50

Generaltenchineuro/r/MensRights21/04/21 08:23 PM
44

Anti-MRMtenchineuro/r/MensRights26/05/22 09:22 PM
40

Discriminationtenchineuro/r/MensRights05/11/19 03:11 PM
38

Legal Rightstenchineuro/r/MensRights12/02/20 08:12 PM
33

Feminismtenchineuro/r/MensRights19/12/19 03:46 PM
30

Generaltenchineuro/r/MensRights30/12/20 08:55 PM
22

Healthtenchineuro/r/MensRights08/10/19 11:24 PM
22

Humourtenchineuro/r/MensRights15/05/20 04:02 PM
21

Social Issuestenchineuro/r/MensRights22/01/20 10:39 PM
21

Generaltenchineuro/r/MensRights08/03/19 10:34 PM
18

Social Issuestenchineuro/r/MensRights13/05/20 11:02 PM
17

Generaltenchineuro/r/MensRights21/12/19 11:39 PM
17

Legal Rightstenchineuro/r/MensRights28/10/20 01:57 PM
16

Legal Rightstenchineuro/r/MensRights07/03/22 04:36 AM
16

Feminismtenchineuro/r/MensRights16/04/19 08:03 PM
15

Generaltenchineuro/r/MensRights04/07/18 01:09 AM
12

Legal Rightstenchineuro/r/MensRights28/10/20 12:04 PM
11

Social Issuestenchineuro/r/MensRights24/08/19 07:24 AM
11

Marriage/Childrentenchineuro/r/MensRights25/07/19 07:48 PM
11

Edu./Occu.tenchineuro/r/MensRights14/05/21 11:29 PM
8

Edu./Occu.tenchineuro/r/MensRights23/08/18 02:11 PM
8

Discriminationtenchineuro/r/MensRights10/12/18 10:03 PM
8

Humourtenchineuro/r/MensRights20/06/22 03:52 AM
7

Marriage/Childrentenchineuro/r/MensRights16/06/18 03:11 AM
7

Legal Rightstenchineuro/r/MensRights05/02/20 11:56 PM
7

Generaltenchineuro/r/MensRights27/06/19 01:01 AM
6

Social Issuestenchineuro/r/MensRights07/06/18 03:17 AM
3

tenchineuro/r/MensRights21/06/18 06:43 PM
2

Social Issuestenchineuro/r/MensRights16/01/19 08:38 PM
1

Generaltenchineuro/r/MensRights12/01/19 09:04 PM
1

Edu./Occu.tenchineuro/r/MensRights03/05/21 05:04 PM
1

Edu./Occu.tenchineuro/r/MensRights03/05/21 04:58 PM
0

Generaltenchineuro/r/MensRights15/11/20 12:35 AM
0

Edu./Occu.tenchineuro/r/MensRights05/02/19 04:33 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 19,923 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

To the women in this sub why do you participate in men’s advocacy? Just posting here does not make anyone a men's advocate, even men. There have indeed been several women who were quite active in men's advocacy, Karen S and the Honeybadgers come to mind. And there were others who accidentally became fellow travelers, Cassie Jaye comes to mind. She is not an MRA and does not care about men, but she did have the integrity to finish her documentary to expose the evil underbelly of the men's right's…
/r/MensRights24/04/26 12:44 AM
1

Patriarchy is one of the devils of the feminist religion, men being the other. Apparently it's like Adam Smith's Invisible Hand of the Market, there's nothing you can point to but somehow it's everywhere. So if anything happens that a woman is not happy with, it the fault of men or the patriarchy or both. Corollary: Nothing is ever a woman's fault.
/r/MensRights10/01/26 09:27 PM
6

Feminism is fine so long as it pertains to its original intent: equality. Feminism is and has always been anti-male. From the first recognized feminist document, the Declaration of Sentiments signed at the Seneca Falls convention in 1848. https://elizabethcadystanton.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/1848DeclarationofSentiments.pdf The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations on the part of man toward woman, having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyrann…
/r/MensRights10/01/26 09:19 PM
1

Now, you can hear points that were made by Karen Straughan back then used by everyday people or on mainstream TV, or by some politicians. They may not be aware where those points come from, but our talking points have been filtering through to society and are having an impact. What impact? Karen S, who used to post here did some wonderful research and advocacy for men's rights. There were also the Honey Badgers and Cassis Jaye. People are more willing to listen to women and many today think they…
/r/MensRights07/01/26 04:53 PM
3

Many western liberals and radical feminists have no idea (and many have no actual desire) for true gender equality. What is true gender equality? And feminism has never been about equality, it's always been exclusively about women and their goal has been 'equity'. Feminism is and has always been opposed to equal treatment under the law.
/r/MensRights05/01/26 12:56 PM
2

Women having higher standards? Did I say anything like this? Since you don't appear to base your response on the text you are responding to, it matters not what I say. So enjoy the zombie apocalypse.
/r/MensRights01/01/26 10:41 PM
1

The thing in this case is that while rape is illegal and considered a crime against the women, false rape accusations are not illegal as such and male victims are not legally victims of anything and have no recourse under the law. As a result of false rape accusations not being a crime, they are not counted, so there is no basis for claims made about their rarity. Further, many places pay victim compensation to rape victims, last time I checked it in the UK could be up to £10,000. One enterprisi…
/r/MensRights28/12/25 03:44 PM
12

That's just trading mostly known dangers for mostly unknown dangers. And while it's true that there are a lot of good foreign women, a great many of those who seek Western men are just after their money. I saw a news report a few years back of a German man begging out on the streets in the Philippines. Seems he woke one morning to find that his Filipino wife had absconded with his life savings leaving him with their children and no money. The lesson her is to maintain full control of your financ…
/r/MensRights28/12/25 03:21 PM
1

even if a majority of young men oppose conscription, the measures are often supported by older generations who don't take the risk What do you mean? Old men took the same risk when they were of age to be drafted. I don't know about Europe, but in the US the draft has never been up for the vote. We vote for congresscritters, senators and presidents, but but not for legislation. I should imagine it's the same in European countries. I'm pretty sure that in some european/scandanavian countries 2 yea…
/r/MensRights28/12/25 02:51 PM
1

The vast majority of the manosphere is on the right. Reddit is one of the exceptions. There was a study done on r/mensrights in 2019 and the results showed that at that time the group leaned slightly left. https://pragmatarian.home.blog/2019/02/07/what-makes-an-mra-part-1-summary-level-demographics/ As this figure makes clear, the single-largest percentage of participants from the full sample – as well as from every subsample analyzed – identify as political moderates. Interestingly, each of the…
/r/MensRights31/07/25 01:19 AM
8

I'm not sure that's possible in the UK. As I recall the Sexual Offenses Act grants any women who makes an accusation anonyminity for life, even if the accusation is proven false. Everything is done to get as many accusations as possible. They not only pay women to make accusations, I believe they call it victims compensation, they grant them anonyminity for life. This opens the door for serial false accusations.
/r/MensRights15/04/25 03:25 PM
2

What rights do women lack that require the ERA to fix? Some here have mentioned the Hayden Rider, which removes equal rights from the ERA. But long ago N.O.W. revised the ERA to meet feminist requirements. ERA Summit Report The following proposed language was adopted by the ERA Summit for presentation to the July 1995 NOW National Conference. "Women and men shall have equal rights and privileges regardless of class, without discrimination based on sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status,…
/r/MensRights27/03/25 12:23 PM
1

The white feather campaign was done because it was believed back then that if you didn't fight for your country, you were a coward, So then you claim that women of that day were cowards? it wasn't anit-men When feminists send men to war to die, it is anti-male, we'll just have to disagree. Women were given access to national service in 1941 for the aid of ww2, but I wouldn't have been allowed to fight alongside men until 2018. The vast majority of women don't want to fight in a war today. I have…
/r/MensRights16/03/25 11:05 PM
2

As far as I can tell this is the reason why things are this way. Sometime around the year 2000, a women was charged with rape, this was known as the towpath rape, and it's getting hard to research today, but this seems to be a reference. Woman, 18, is bailed on towpath rape charge. https://www.thefreelibrary.com/Woman%2c+18%2c+is+bailed+on+towpath+rape+charge.-a064148508 She was actually convicted of rape. Girl, 18, convicted of canal rape http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/1225124.stm She was s…
/r/MensRights16/03/25 07:16 PM
5

There have been many petitions like this in the past, the Crown's response has always been that things are fine the way they are.
/r/MensRights16/03/25 01:20 AM
1

I said the media has ruined the original statement of feminism Whut? The declaration of sentiments says what it says, the media has nothing to do with it. and that the original focus of the political ideology was for women to have the same rights as men. Not so, feminism want all the things they think men have (work did not set men free) and all the benefits of coverture that women still have. If you claim different show me.
/r/MensRights13/03/25 01:41 AM
1

Well, hopefully it was their choice because Groom Kidnaping and forced marriage is a thing in India. Groom kidnapping https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groom_kidnapping Groom kidnapping, colloquially known as Pakaruah shaadi or Jabaria shaadi, is a phenomenon in the western parts of Bihar and eastern Uttar Pradesh states, more prominent in Munger and Dumka (now in Jharkhand) wherein eligible bachelors are abducted by the bride's family and later forcibly married, to get men with better education and…
/r/MensRights10/03/25 08:37 PM
1

I am wedded to the idea that feminism was good in the past. It's the reason I am allowed to vote for my country. I don't know what your country is but... In the US women did not want the vote, they did not want to pay the price men paid for the vote, the draft. Women still don't want to be drafted today. But this entire subject is based on the lie that women did not have the vote, for the most part women can and vote in local and state elections, they just lacked the federal vote. In the UK wome…
/r/MensRights10/03/25 04:40 PM
2

I'm not an American. Why would I have knowledge about an event that happened on a different continent to me in 1995 ,around the 3rd wave of feminism which I don't even support. If you paid attention you would note that I just informed you. Does information about feminism always make you defensive? But the fact remains, feminism is opposed to equal treatment under the law regardless of what your dictionary might say. I explained that I don't consider modern feminism proper feminism It's no differ…
/r/MensRights09/03/25 11:04 PM
19

The definition of feminism is the advocacy of women's rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes I don't think feminism owns a dictionary. In 1995 or so there was a ballot measure in California known as Proposition 209. Feminism was massively against it and called it the literal reimplimentation of slavery. An anti-209 rally drew 200,000 feminists. What horror was feminism opposing? (a) The state shall not discriminate against, or grant preferential treatment to, any individual or group on…
/r/MensRights09/03/25 02:53 AM
21

Feminism isn't bad. It has been rewired and had its name ruined by women who claim that misandry is feminism, which it isn't. Feminism is and has always been anti-male. From the first recognized feminist document, he Declaration of Sentiments signed in 1848 at Seneca Falls NY.... https://liberalarts.utexas.edu/coretexts/_files/resources/texts/1848DeclarationofSentiments.pdf The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations on the part of man toward woman, having in direct …
/r/MensRights09/03/25 02:44 AM
23

She was not charged with any sexual crimes, and apparently they did not want to try her from the crimes they were willing charge her with. So they sent he off for 'treatment'. Normally is someone is deemed unfit to stand trial, they send them to treatment until they are fit to stand trial and then have the trial. I don't expect that to happen here.
/r/MensRights08/03/25 02:35 AM
1

And you reply with whatabout my previous whataboutism?! This is so circular I'm getting dizzy. What I did was ask you some questions, but apparently you don't do questions or have discussions. That being the case, this is not going anywhere and is a waste of time. I'm out, you can have the last word.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 10:32 PM
4

I don't want a hopefully vague bullet list, give me specific examples that I can research. BTW, which feminist source did you get this list from?
/r/MensRights23/02/25 09:38 PM
1

And you have not answered my questions. If you think men don't suffer in socialist economies, maybe you should do some research. Your claim is that capitalism is responsible, but refuse to compare and contrast with non-capitalist societies, you are not even trying to be reasonable. But then, communists use something they call deconstruction rather than reason.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 09:32 PM
2

I am one, but recognize certain privlidges that I have in socitety. Tell us about these privileges.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 09:24 PM
3

The movement for justice and equity Which movement is this? What do you mean by justice? Is it what's called social justice? What do you mean by equality?
/r/MensRights23/02/25 09:11 PM
1

Why is it a 'feminist argument'? Because feminism is very anti-capitalist. And how does the present existence of socialist states influence whether capitalism is anti-male? If capitalism is the root cause of a problem, then all non-capitalist places should not have this problem. Which socialist utopia do you advocate for?
/r/MensRights23/02/25 09:05 PM
6

I'm not sure about the others but the Elks were sued by feminists in the 2000s and were forced to admit women. Elks Lodge Settles ACLU Lawsuit, Agrees to Admit Women as Members https://www.aclu.org/press-releases/elks-lodge-settles-aclu-lawsuit-agrees-admit-women-members ROME, NY -- The New York Civil Liberties Union and the Women's Rights Project of the American Civil Liberties Union today hailed the settlement of a lawsuit brought by a local woman who was denied admission to an Elks Lodge here…
/r/MensRights23/02/25 08:40 PM
1

Q: Why is blame from MRA's against men's treatment hardly ever directed at capitalism? (Discussion) Congratulations, feminism is against both men and capitalism. This is a very feminist argument. There are many socialist, errr, utopias in the world, which non-capitalist country meets your expectations?
/r/MensRights23/02/25 08:25 PM
6

While a few such cases have been mentioned here recently, I don't recall many in the past. There was one case in some scandanavian country where the women posted that she was raped by some man in a forum and that man won in court for libel. The award was only a few hundred dollars (if I did the conversion correctly). The problem is that false rape accusations against a man are not considered a crime, much less a crime against the man. In the UK women who make false rape accusations are sometimes…
/r/MensRights23/02/25 08:11 PM
1

I support equal rights. Do you?
/r/MensRights10/12/24 04:47 PM
1

I have not read the article, but the movie that stands out for me is the latest A Star Is Born, where the male protaganist is a worthless drunk druggie that finally does everyone a favor and kills himself. At least in the Barbra Striesand version he was a decent chap who died in a car accident. This movie has been remade twice and I don't know about the original version, but it was probably in the 40s to 50s and as most movies back then it would have a decent plot.
/r/MensRights14/10/24 03:50 PM
2

As far as I understand, rape in general is more likely to be a serial offence, which is something that Feminists exploit as they often conflate "number of rapes" and "number of rapists" in order to construct part of their "rape culture" narrative. Unless I misunderstand what you are saying, this seems wrong. If rape were to be a serial offense then the number of rapists would be less than the number of rapes, perhaps by quite a bit.
/r/MensRights26/09/24 02:02 AM
1

On the brighter side, one man came in and said he didn't believe in abortion after 20 weeks, to which the host says they aren't a person until they're born so abortion at ANY point in the nine months is fine, and that there are no laws protecting unborn babies in America(?). It depends. A few years ago I posted about a criminal case where a man tried to put an abortificant in this girlfiend's drive (he as the father). She detected it and got the police involved. He was tried for attempted murder…
/r/MensRights27/07/24 05:57 PM
2

According to ChatGPT 3.5, user input is not used for training purposes. I'm pretty sure Copilot said the same thing. It's easy to find out, just ask the AI.
/r/MensRights27/07/24 05:48 PM
3

Interesting. Many things have already started occurring pre-AI. MGTOW is growing and according to some YT videos some women are angry. Many videos by the women themselves make this clear. But about how prevelant this is, who can say. Women have been saying that they don't need no man for decades, and now most men are afraid to approach a woman and the marriage rate is the lowest since numbers were first recorded and there are also a huge number of women who have never been in a relationship or e…
/r/MensRights27/07/24 05:34 PM
6

I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I Kant do that...
/r/MensRights27/07/24 05:19 PM
-8

OK. Why are you posting this here?
/r/MensRights19/07/24 03:59 PM
2

It's too late for that, feminism has already won. But everyone else has lost. Birthrates and marriage rates have fallen all over the world, but especially in Japan, South Koreaa and Italy. Even then, these countries are making some weak attempts to convince their populations to have children, but they are doing a full court press to empower women and get more women in the workplace. The men's movement has been telling men that marriage is a bad idea for decades, at least since the 90s, and no on…
/r/MensRights13/07/24 05:28 PM
1

I've not read the post yet, but you have to be careful with AI. I've been playing around with copilot and llama3 lately and I normally ask questions that I know the answer to, and the AI acccuracy is not very high. But it did draw a picture of Albert Einstein on a jetski. Score +1 When asked to draw a picture of mermaids playing vollyball, it had all the mermaids on one side of the net. Score -1 The mermaids looked a lot like The Little Mermaid. Copilot images are very cartoonish, which is fine.…
/r/MensRights08/07/24 03:40 PM
1

It may be old, but it's true. The overaall message is that women don't actually hear what men say. This is even more true for feminists. Her feminist card was revoked because she broke an unwritten feminist rule, never give men a platform from which to be heard. And she was attacked by feminism because of this. But it's important to note that while she does seem to have journalistic integrity, she is not a male ally, not a little, not at all. She has done many interviews and she make it crystal …
/r/MensRights08/07/24 03:13 PM
4

> 📷"While the husband had not explicitly proven cruelty in their day-to-day life, the wife's actions, including filing false criminal cases and continuous legal disputes, constituted cruelty." | Allahabad High Court It does actually, cruelty by the wife.
/r/MensRights11/12/23 04:05 AM
1

There is only so much bad press that any political party will stand for before they drop a politician. I'm sure Trump would be amused. There was almost total denial by the media about Hunter Bidens laptop before the last US presidential election, From what I've read there was a coverup. I've read that one newspaper's twitter account (I think) was deleted when they tried to report on it. Every little dimwit that we get passing thru here proclaiming that feminism is for equality is only a feminist…
/r/MensRights11/12/23 03:40 AM
1

A masculinist is to men what a feminist is to women. Really? Please name a few maculinists, and show me their websites, subs or social media.
/r/MensRights11/12/23 01:26 AM
1

Most masculinists are radical masculinists by the literal dictionary definition of radical masculinism: What's a masculinist? Also, this is a feminist talkijng point, that objecting to feminist sexism and hate makes you as bad as what you are objecting to.
/r/MensRights11/12/23 12:51 AM
1

For a group called mens rights I find most of the posts are about women. Do you understand that 'feminist' is not synonymous with 'woman'?
/r/MensRights11/12/23 12:47 AM
1

Elected people only stay in power with favourable media and donations. Many people vote straight party line and seem unaware of what their party is actually doing. In a red state, the red candidate will almost always win, same in blue states. The real power lies with those that have the money to donate and the power to dictate media coverage. If media does not cover things, all that will change is that people will be unaware of what feminism is doing. Not that they seem very aware as it is.
/r/MensRights11/12/23 12:17 AM
1

You're just arguing semantics. No, this is not semantics, you have divided feminism into two groups. Radical feminists non-radical feminists They have different names because they theoretically are different in some fashion. No one has ever been able to show me that non-radical feminism exists, but like you they seem to believe that they do. Calling it semantics shows that you don't seem to understand what you are claiming. Let me phrase it another way... Good feminists Bad feminists You are cla…
/r/MensRights10/12/23 11:00 PM
1

Yep, this is feminist equality. ‘Within days, she attacked me, punching me so hard in the face that she broke her hand. ‘The police became involved and I was arrested. Yes, me! It was force policy in domestic abuse situations, to remove one person from the property to prevent further escalation. ‘I was not on the rent agreement – as I was not allowed to be, [for] more control for her, I just paid the bills – so I was told by the police that I had to leave.
/r/MensRights10/12/23 10:52 PM
1

I disagree completely. The reality of what feminism has said and done is as unaffected as your continued support for it. I don't agree with anyone rewriting these laws So you think the anti-male laws written by feminism should not be changed? nor have I personally been apart of this You claim solidarity with the movement who wrote these laws. You could stop calling yourself a feminist in way of protest, but I doubt that you care. I have yet to meet a single feminist that thinks this way I've yet…
/r/MensRights10/12/23 10:46 PM
2

My theory about the Sexual Offenses act of 2003 is that when after Clair Marsh was convicted of rape in the towpath rape case in 2001 it got everyone upset, especially feminism. In two short years the sexual offenses laws were re-written. https://archive.is/SGWgB Woman found guilty of towpath rape Teenager punched victim and held her down in gang attack A teenager became what is believed to be the youngest woman ever to be convicted of rape yesterday when a court ruled she stripped, punched and …
/r/MensRights10/12/23 10:24 PM
2

Who wrote the VAWA and the Duluth Model? Who made them Laws? They are not laws per se, the Duluth Model was incorporated into the VAWA during the first re-authorization if I'm not mistaken. It seems that the previous 'primary offender' policy was resulting in too many women being arrested. Can't have that. What would happen to feminism if the media owners decided "No more feminism on our platforms"? What if these people decided not to cover any feminism stuff like they disappeared the train cras…
/r/MensRights10/12/23 10:09 PM
1

We should stop trying and focus on fixing our own issues. Only over feminism's dead body. Did you miss the part about feminism successfully blocking every attempt to make things better for men? I don't know why you're trying to make an enemy of out me. I'm not, not as such, but you seem to be supporting and defending the things feminism does to hurt men. Which does bring up the question of who's side you are on. Feminists aren't going to undo these things. And men don't have the power to do so.
/r/MensRights10/12/23 09:55 PM
2

Whether or not radical feminism exists is not relevant to the discussion. Your first sentence... I have a theory as to why radical feminism exploded in the 1960s. If you can't show me this non-radical feminism your argument is moot.
/r/MensRights10/12/23 05:41 AM
4

I've heard of it, but if it's true, it makes it all the more impressive we're actually making some headway when even the CIA is against us. https://uscpublicdiplomacy.org/blog/feminist-was-spy The Feminist Was a Spy What is often missed, or mischaracterized, however, is the work she did as a CIA agent: Steinem was a spook. CIA agents are tight-lipped, but Steinem spoke openly about her relationship to The Agency in the 1950s and ’60s after a magazine revealed her employment by a CIA front organi…
/r/MensRights10/12/23 05:36 AM
2

I repeat, please show me this non-radical feminism.
/r/MensRights10/12/23 05:32 AM
3

See, that theory came about BECAUSE of radical feminism. The Declaration of Sentiments disagrees with you. https://liberalarts.utexas.edu/coretexts/_files/resources/texts/1848DeclarationofSentiments.pdf The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations on the part of man toward woman, having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over her. And please show me this non-radical feminism.
/r/MensRights10/12/23 05:18 AM
5

That we're able to make any headway despite being outnumbered, outgunned, and outfunded is the strange part, and is nothing short of a small miracle. Did you know that Gloria Steinem was a CIA operative? Also, society exists to protect and provide for women, they get excused for almost everything. Our culture derived from coverture.
/r/MensRights10/12/23 05:16 AM
11

Feminists have never had any power. Who wrote the VAWA and the Duluth Model? They still don't own or control anything. Can you explain what you mean by this?
/r/MensRights10/12/23 05:10 AM
12

Female violence against men is all but legal. Even women convicted of violence against men usually receive no punishment or a very light slap on the wrist. I recall a case where a woman beat her boyfriend so badly he had to be hospitalized, and when he got out of the hospital the police arrested him. This was in the UK. So there does not seem to be any beneficial course of action no matter how the laws are written. They are not equally enforced, even if written sex neutrally.
/r/MensRights10/12/23 12:04 AM
11

Rape = sex without consent. It appears that virtually anything and everything nullifies consent today. If she had just one drink, she probably lacks the ability to give consent. Also women seem to be able to withdraw consent retroactively. And also this does not come into play if a woman does to a man what would be rape if he did it to her.
/r/MensRights09/12/23 11:51 PM
1

I am not sure what you are referring to by another motive? After the study you can now say something about MRAs, even though this sub is not restricted to MRAs. In the past the things said about this sub have often been not only untrue but offensive to most participants. This has lead to some degree of caution. The reason why we have decided to recruit participants in this forum is because we are currently looking to recruit more males as we are lacking this demographic. I believe that a valid s…
/r/MensRights09/12/23 11:45 PM
2

To me, all of men's issues are for society to solve, Then we are stuck in coverture, for men only. feminists won't solve them. They are too busy creating more problems for men. And they are also busy blocking all attempts to recind the parts that discriminate against men, most of which they wrote. Anything that ignores feminist sexiam and hate (and the fact that they now write laws) is not and cannot be a solution. Even the ones like VAWA, Title IX and the Duluth Model which were created by femi…
/r/MensRights09/12/23 11:23 PM
2

Exactly. If you show by scientific studies that women are happier and live better lives than men in the West Are you sure women are happier? https://www.nber.org/papers/w14969 * The Paradox of Declining Female Happiness * Abstract * By many objective measures the lives of women in the United States have improved over the past 35 years, yet we show that measures of subjective well-being indicate that women's happiness has declined both absolutely and relative to men. The paradox of women's declin…
/r/MensRights09/12/23 08:02 PM
3

There is nothing about the study that is in any war related to the men's rights movement, so the question is, why post this here? No really, is there some other motive?
/r/MensRights09/12/23 07:47 PM
2

The org I worked with partnered with a ton of different and diverse organizations but 100% the lack was constantly in adequate support groups and therapy for male victims, more so adult victims, but even the support for male victims when they were children was atrociously small. Thanx feminism.
/r/MensRights09/12/23 07:43 PM
2

I still consider myself a feminist because I still believe our society greatly needs women who work to create better circumstances for victims, specifically in relation to DV, R, SA, SH. About these things. Feminism has actually written the Violence Against Women Act in the US which effectively defines DV as something only men can do to only women. It also denies male victims any aid. Feminism has been instrumental in making sure that the definition of rape excludes men as victims in the US (ref…
/r/MensRights09/12/23 07:42 PM
0

What other people haven't brought up is that when feminists do realize that men have issues, and start advocating for them, Feminism blames all men's issues on the men themselves, the patriarchy, and toxic masculinity. Feminism has always advocated against addressing men's issues. This documentary is called The Red Pill. It's now free to watch on YT. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q7MkSpJk5tM&t=1s and realizing that our points are actually valid, and had her mind changed. Not exactly, despite f…
/r/MensRights09/12/23 07:33 PM
3

I don't necessarily blame feminists for the existence men's issues. Not even the ones they caused directly? Reference the Violence Against Women Act, which not only makes it impossible for a man to be a victim of domestic violence, but denies men any aid. Also reference Title IX.
/r/MensRights09/12/23 07:20 PM
2

I think it would be nice if feminists realized that men are people too. Posting this in a feminist sub can get you banned.
/r/MensRights09/12/23 07:17 PM
0

The forum may be r\feminism, tell me how you can tell the commenters are feminist? I can still post there, not banned quite yet. and I'm not a feminist.
/r/MensRights09/12/23 07:07 PM
1

I did a bit more research and found a few feminists even agree it is stupid to blame men for this problem. Can you post some links to the articles/whatever?
/r/MensRights09/12/23 06:57 PM
11

Women have started blaming everything on men Started? Are you serious? The first recognized feminist document, the Declaration of Sentiments* signed in 1848 at Seneca Falls NY literally blames men. The whole document is anti-male, it's not even pro-female. https://liberalarts.utexas.edu/coretexts/_files/resources/texts/1848DeclarationofSentiments.pdf The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations on the part of man toward woman, having in direct object the establishment…
/r/MensRights09/12/23 06:53 PM
1

No. You don’t need a link there are many homeless shelters for men not sure why it wouldn’t they have some in Arkansas,Texas, California and others. So you are speculating. By law they have to. What law? Got a link?
/r/MensRights30/07/23 07:55 PM
1

The Men’s Development Center offers a six month Spiritual Recovery Program and a year long Transitional Living Program (TLC). In TLC men are expected to remain gainfully employed and to practice the virtues of thrift and saving. The TLC is a year-long program. This is a religious service and you need to be employed, which is rather difficult when you are homeless. This may not be suitable for those of non-christian faiths or atheists. But it offers food and shelter and a limited stay. Let's say …
/r/MensRights30/07/23 07:53 PM
1

I don't see anything that clearly states who they serve. Despite the majority of homeless being men, most resources are for women and children. The best a man can get is temporary shelter for the night. They work hard to get women and women with children off the streets, and women also have priority at most shelters.
/r/MensRights30/07/23 07:41 PM
1

Oops! That page can’t be found. It looks like nothing was found at this location. Maybe try one of the links below or a search?
/r/MensRights30/07/23 07:37 PM
1

Not sure where you people are getting your information but that’s false. So you're saying 'got a link' is false? we have plenty of shelters for both men and women in the U.S. Got a link?
/r/MensRights30/07/23 07:37 PM
2

You can see the previous article, faces of the MRM. About that, while I don't recall ever visiting that site. it says I am out of free articles. So that does not work. And if that's where the article is published, same problem. That's my goal, having a mainstream journalist writing a serious article about the listed problems, So far they've always been hit pieces, the Southern Poverty Law Center has labeled this sub a hate group. There is reason for concern.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 04:41 AM
3

They do have shelters for men. Got a link?
/r/MensRights26/07/23 01:00 AM
2

I guess everyone has the same question, is this going to another hit pieces on the group? The second question is whether you will post a link to the article or whatever you intend to produce.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 12:55 AM
1

Men behaving courteously toward women — holding the door for them, offering them their jackets when it's cold — is called chivalry. Many women consider chivalry a lost art. Back in the day women were also expected to be polite in their dealings with men, but that was centuries ago. Nice work, fellas. Feminism and women killed chivalry by attacking men whenever they do these things. Feminism says this oppresses women.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 02:44 PM
0

Back to the life advice: Be careful when being a smart ass. you don’t know shit about me. Since I was not talking about you, this has nothing to do with the comments made. The fact remains that the wife is under no obligation to do anything and will be rewarded for actions that would put the husband in jail. You don’t know what I had to go through I know that you don't seem to have learned that the wife has all the power and no responsibilities and is free to lie about what the husband has done,…
/r/MensRights25/07/23 02:24 PM
2

One life to save 5 is always a good deal in scenarios of survival. Things IRL are rarely that simple. A few cliff notes for you. * Only your life is disposable, unless you have sons * If your wife needs you for survival, she's left adrift with no survival skills, so their survival may only be temporary. I’m disposable to keep my sister and her kids alive, See? so what is our purpose other than cannon fodder for a war or a resource for society to be disposed of when no longer useful? You can deve…
/r/MensRights25/07/23 02:14 PM
1

🤣 that’s what happens when I try to rephrase but forget to delete extra words. Happens more often than it should. But it was more colorful than 'going down with the ship', the end results were death in both cases.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 01:59 PM
0

Chivalry has nothing to do with responsibilities. Go look up the definition. Technically, Chivalry is about horses, https://web.cn.edu/kwheeler/cult_of_chivalry.html Cult of Chivalry Chivalry is an idealized code of military and social behavior for the aristocracy in the late medieval period. The word "chivalry" comes from Old French cheval (horse) and literally means "horsemanship." Normally, only rich nobility could afford the expensive armor, weaponry, and warhorses necessary for mounted comb…
/r/MensRights25/07/23 01:54 PM
7

All of them?? All of what? Also, I have no clue what sanctions would be and who decides. Men go to jail for non-payment of child support or Alimony, often when their wages are being garnished and they are not behind. Remain faithful. You're joking she will be rewarded in the divorce regardless of the cause. have a child Not so, she can do whatever the fuck she want and the husband has no recourse. She can lie about wanting a family and there is nothing the husband can do. And many men have found…
/r/MensRights25/07/23 04:55 AM
4

I'm still not clear. Let's try again. Do you consider men seeking equal and fair treatment as "This sub would rather see women treated worse than men treated better"? That's what your "Wow, you got downvoted for that?" statement says.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 04:36 AM
9

If it's presented in court, you are instructed to accept it as evidence. And if you don't know about the problems with forensics, you will accept an 'expert' witnesses opinion as fact.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 04:34 AM
2

Kens were second class citizens because they were created to be props for Barbies by Mattel Barbie and Ken were both toys, for girls.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 04:30 AM
2

I don't know if you were forced to go see the movie, but why watch anything coming out of the US right now? Seriously, for a surprising amount of time, things seemed generally OK, but then... But I can't help but wonder if things are different elsewhere.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 04:28 AM
12

I had to fake a laugh because my sisters were sitting next to me and they were laughing, Why?
/r/MensRights25/07/23 04:25 AM
2

to try to save as many female children and women as possible. FTFY. Boys 13 or older were left to swim with the sharks as they were considered adults. One boy, to his everlasting shame, donned a bonnet and was let on a lifeboat. It may have been his mother's doing, I'm not clear about that point.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 04:08 AM
7

I don’t see women as some kind of higher power or dominant. You support chivalry, so that's exactly what you support. Under Chivalry men take all the responsibility and woman have no responsibility at all. At least you did not make some pointless claims about 'equality' as you throw that out the window right off.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 04:04 AM
0

I’d fight you to kill you but I’d understand. If there is a possibility of saving both families but I die? That’s a good deal in my book. You need to get a better book. But you do uphold the feminist ideal that men are disposable. I barely care about my life as it stands. So many men feel that way in today's world.Any idea why?
/r/MensRights25/07/23 04:00 AM
2

I believe that men and women are equal but different. Men AND women both have their responsibilities. Can you give me a list of women's responsibilities? Responsibilities that they will be sanctioned for not meeting.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 03:54 AM
6

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_and_children_first "Women and children first", known to a lesser extent as the Birkenhead drill,[1][2] is a code of conduct whereby the lives of women and children were to be saved first in a life-threatening situation, typically abandoning ship, when survival resources such as lifeboats were limited. However, it has no basis in maritime law. In the 19th and early 20th century, "women and children first" was seen as a chivalric ideal.[3] The concept "was celeb…
/r/MensRights25/07/23 03:48 AM
8

Though I wouldn’t be surprised if the PD slaps her with a charge for wasting public resources, I would.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 03:44 AM
16

And be careful about that too. Much of forensics is reading tea leaves and most of it has undergone no scientific scrutiny. Hair analysis is snake oil (no, they don't compare the hair's DNA and it's used even today as far as I know).
/r/MensRights25/07/23 03:43 AM
19

Especially when fake feminists say this, they're only talking about believing women and not men. That's real feminism and real feminists, and a great many women as well.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 03:39 AM
5

Wow, you got downvoted for that? You mean this? This sub would rather see women treated worse than men treated better. Is that what you think too?
/r/MensRights25/07/23 03:38 AM
4

Hypothetical question: do I have a right to throw your family out of the boat to save myself and my family? Not that I'm aware of. I thought this kind of foolery was done with a trolley and a switch. But seafaring tradition says women and children first, so if the lifeboat was full or nearly so and there were other female or children passengers, well, you are a good swimmer, right?
/r/MensRights25/07/23 03:35 AM
7

“Those obligations are EARNED”. No, men are obligated by law and custom. To sum it up, upon marriage (or common law marriage) the man has often a lifelong obligation to the women (even without kids), the woman has no obligations in marriage or after divorce. Many men today are looking at this and saying, no deal.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 03:10 AM
-1

On a related note, people would do well to cut out all this "man cave" shit. A woman can have a "beauty parlour" or a "sewing room" or a "crafts den" but no, Actually, no. The man gets one room, probably in the basement where they have them, or maybe the garage. The women gets the rest of the house.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 03:11 PM
4

I don't think there are any unbiased review sites anymore. But I would go more by the audience ratings and not the reviewers ratings.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 03:07 PM
3

I'm unable to find equality Welcome to feminist equality. Men, when allowed on the bus, sit at the back.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 02:20 PM
4

I would not trust Rotten Tomatoes. It's owned by the movie industry. Since January 2010, Rotten Tomatoes has been owned by Flixster, which was in turn acquired by Warner Bros. in 2011. In February 2016, Rotten Tomatoes and its parent site Flixster were sold to Comcast's Fandango. Warner Bros. retained a minority stake in the merged entities, including Fandango. This was shown in the fiasco around Captain America where they removed thousands or tens of thousands of negative reviews. I was watchin…
/r/MensRights24/07/23 02:18 PM
4

Feminists don't read reformist socialist or Marxist theory, and interpret everything through the gender lens, not economics. They do both. Feminism (which is basically Marxism lite), fights against/complains about basically two things... Patriarchy Capitalism They say that men and Capitalism/Patriarchy are destroying the world.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 02:05 PM
3

Nevertheless, feminists are not a monolith. Feminists are a group of people (almost entirely female) with a common belief system. The primary belief seems to be that we line in a patriarchy. Patriarchy Theory: All men oppress women for men's benefit. You are not allowed to question Patriarchy Theory. Nevertheless, the feminist who do believe that started holding those kind of beliefs after men did it, for quite some time. Found the feminist.
/r/AntiFeminists29/11/22 03:07 PM
3

The belief that a class of people is ultimately and biologically intellectually inferior is a... pretty interesting kind of belief. Nevertheless, that's what feminists believe about men.
/r/AntiFeminists29/11/22 02:32 PM
3

There is a direct correlation between high testosterone and violence. It's not that simple. The thing is, the male and female bodies get rid of excess testosterone by converting it to estrogen in a process known as aromatization. Aromatization is the process of converting a nonaromatic ring into an aromatic ring and is catalyzed by aromatase, a P450 enzyme. Aromatization converts androgens into estrogens. Estrogens contain an aromatic six-carbon ring. Roid Rage is basically PMS. Knowing the prob…
/r/AntiFeminists29/11/22 02:30 PM
7

No one wants to get rid of men. A lot of feminists do.
/r/AntiFeminists29/11/22 02:26 PM
3

Even more sinister than that. They want to get rid of all men. Actually they want to get rid of 90% of men and keep a small breeding stock. See the comment about Sally Miller Gearhart below.
/r/AntiFeminists29/11/22 02:26 PM
5

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_Miller_Gearhart Sally Miller Gearhart In her early career, Gearhart took part in a series of seminars at San Francisco State University, where feminist scholars were critically discussing issues of rape, slavery, and the possibility of nuclear annihilation. Gearhart outlines a three-step proposal for female-led social change from her essay, "The Future–-If There Is One–-is Female": I) Every culture must begin to affirm a female future. II) Species responsibili…
/r/AntiFeminists28/11/22 09:49 PM
12

Breasts are not secondary sex characteristics in women, they are primary. Women can orgasm from breast stimulation alone. https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/nipple-orgasm What to know about nipple orgasms Most likely biologically this is so that the woman feels pleasure when feeding her children and is more likely to do it. It works for sex itself.
/r/AntiFeminists27/11/22 09:18 PM
1

In total, Holmes was sentenced to 135 months in prison, as well as three years of supervised release. A surrender date was set for April 27th. She will also be ordered to pay restitution, though Judge Ed Davila said that amount will be determined at a separate hearing. Prosecutors had asked for more than $800 million in restitution, accounting for 29 investors, but at the sentencing hearing, Davila said restitution would be based on $121 million in losses to 10 investors, according to The New Yo…
/r/MensRights19/11/22 04:10 PM
2

I never said men were evil back then. You agreed with the Declaration of Sentiments which says exactly that. The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations on the part of man toward woman, having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over her. I just said that they did basically have absolute control over women, because they did When you say "they", to whom do you refer? Married men did have absolute responsibility for her well-being and welfare howe…
/r/AntiFeminists19/11/22 04:04 PM
5

I mean, it was true back then. Please, show me how men were evil back then. Again, nowadays, feminism is undoubtedly about hating on men. Feminism has always been about hating on men.
/r/AntiFeminists19/11/22 03:53 PM
1

We also note the need for more research on the factors that impact men’s mental health, including the possibility that when men and masculinity are discussed in disparaging ways (e.g. the term ‘toxic masculinity’) in the media, academia, and elsewhere, this might be a contributory factor to mental health risk for men and boys. Given the how commonplace negativity about men and masculinity has become, some readers may be surprised there is evidence that aspects of masculinity can be harnessed to …
/r/MensRights19/11/22 03:52 PM
7

From the first recognized feminist document, the Declaration of Sentiments signed in Seneca Falls NY in 1848. The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations on the part of man toward woman, having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over her. You may interpret this as being about equality, but to me it looks like hating on men.
/r/AntiFeminists19/11/22 03:42 PM
3

The whole purpose of feminism is that EVERYONE is treated fairly. What has feminism said or done that makes you think this?
/r/AntiFeminists16/11/22 03:52 PM
3

This is kinda old... Edwina Currie spoke at the Oxford Union in 2013: I tend to think that 'feminist when it's convenient' is a thing. Probably more-so now than in 2013.
/r/AntiFeminists01/11/22 12:53 AM
0

Feminism had a reason to exist yes, Yes, hatred of men. but in the past not anymore Show me.
/r/MensRights31/10/22 02:38 AM
0

yeah i dont doubt that 100 years ago women USED to be oppressed Found the communist. Maybe you should do some research comrade?
/r/MensRights31/10/22 02:37 AM
1

I suspect a lot of feminists can quite easily see the discrimination and hate being aimed at men in the media and elsewhere and think that it's fair because of how women were treated five thousand years ago. Bullshit, they can't see discrimination against men and anyway, they don't care.
/r/MensRights31/10/22 02:33 AM
1

My two cents: it is certainly possible to find common cause with a great number of women who may call themselves feminists. Say what? Many, perhaps even most, of them really do think feminism is about equality, and just haven’t given much thought to what men deal with. Having spent decades showing them what feminism actually does, I disagree, they could care less.
/r/MensRights31/10/22 02:31 AM
3

The birthrate is already below replacement in most of the western world, the government response has been to blame men. The marriage rate is also today the lowest since records were first kept, the reaction is the same, it's men need to grow up and take responsibility. But the eastern world is not golden, I'm pretty sure that the lowest birthrate in the world is in Japan. The Japanese government is also blaming men, and also doing whatever they can to get women out of the home and into the workp…
/r/MensRights25/10/22 03:31 PM
1

and most of the babies will be girls! Source? BTW, men are not a species. If there is an extinction, the human species (home sapiens) will become extinct.
/r/MensRights25/10/22 02:56 PM
1

Here is the thing, When we attack feminism, we are attacking the ideas presented within the movement (and their campaigns) on HOW to reach equality. What we need is a functional society that supports their own. What we have is a legal system that violates Constitution and Civil Rights in the name of 'equality'. If everyone's eights and interests are protected equally, much of this madness will disappear. But given that commonwealth law is descended from coverture that ain't going to happen.
/r/AntiFeminists24/10/22 03:32 AM
2

Hi! So I know some feminists view pornography as empowering while others view it the complete opposite. The two feminist sides are that... Porn oppresses women. Censorship oppresses women. Feminism, after all is only about women. But there is a third side rarely mentioned. Feminism opposes anything and everything that men enjoy. Literally, feminism does things simply to hurt men even when they don't help women. For example feminism wrote a proportionality rule into Title IX. Basically it means t…
/r/MensRights23/10/22 07:42 PM
2

They do satire well if you ask me. But in the days of POE's law, it can be hard to tell the difference sometimes.
/r/MensRights23/10/22 04:43 PM
1

You and Helen Lovejoy said the exact same thing. I don't see what your issue is. At any rate, what does this even mean in the context of this post?
/r/MensRights08/10/22 09:50 PM
5

I have been posting there, not frequently and I litter the post with references as you will be accused of making things up otherwise, it still happens with cites, but less so. Not long ago some feminist posted that women get custody because the patriarchy forces women to care for children. This is not only wrong, it's backwards, so I posted that under coverture the husband had the obligation to provide for his family and in the case of a divorce he was given custody. This (and other things) was …
/r/MensRights08/10/22 09:42 PM
1

Off the top of my head, better access to birth control/ Better than what? Obamacare already grants everything related to female reproduction free to women. It also requires no coverage for men's reproductive issues at all. If an insured man wants a vasectomy, he has to pay the full price out of pocket. And for the uninsured Planned Parenthood will provide the rest for free or at reduced cost (PP operated primarily on billions of dollars of federal funds BTW) in every state. Why don't you explain…
/r/MensRights08/10/22 09:13 PM
2

I think patriarchy is a product of female hypergamy. Rather, feminist 'Patriarchy Theory' is an invention of feminism used to bash men regardless of what they may have done or not done. Patriarchy Theory: All men oppress women for men's benefit. Feminism is basically Marxism Lite.
/r/MensRights08/10/22 08:59 PM
0

The main objective of mothers is not to find a male. It's to raise her offspring to adulthood. If she does not find a man, at least on a temporary basis. there can be no offspring. Said man will be held financially responsible for any children but has no enforceable right to be a father.
/r/MensRights08/10/22 08:54 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3jFqhjaGh30 Won't somebody please think of the children
/r/MensRights07/10/22 11:58 PM
1

It's not a problem but if it was me and I was asked for my life story every six months I'd probably end up getting tired of rewriting it, so... Well, I am kinda slow, but on a few reoccurring topics I eventually wrote the subject into a text editor and saved the file. Now when the subject comes up, I can copy and paste it into the comment and edit for the context. I can also edit the text file for clarity and completeness.
/r/MensRights07/10/22 11:56 PM
7

Sure, why not, let's blame all of women's issues on toxic femininity. /s
/r/MensRights07/10/22 11:52 PM
2

Feminism has turned into a political movement that is trying to force men into a corner whilst disregarding the incredible things that men do and have done. Has turned into?
/r/MensRights07/10/22 04:01 PM
2

as for what feminists are doing to help If I'm not greatly mistaken, feminism was greatly involved in writing the new APA GUIDELINES for Psychological Practice with Boys and Men which basically defines masculinity as a pathology. https://www.apa.org/about/policy/boys-men-practice-guidelines.pdf OPPRESSION Oppression includes discrimination against and/or systematic denial of resources to members of groups who are identified as inferior or less deserving than others. Oppression is most frequently…
/r/AntiFeminists07/10/22 03:56 PM
0

i believe extreme feminism As opposed to what? Show me this non-extreme feminism.
/r/AntiFeminists06/10/22 05:15 AM
2

"For me, feminism just means women and men being equal." So then you support trans-women competing in women's sports?
/r/AntiFeminists06/10/22 05:14 AM
1

Some states require you to join a party and vote only in that party's primary. Why is there a problem with that? Let the parties choose their own candidates. And you don't have to join that party, you just have to declare yourself rep/dem/green/whatevs on your voter registration. You can re-register and change it later. In these cases, you are going to get daily fliers from all the candidates, daily calls, people will show up at your door and beg for money, and they will beg you to work events a…
/r/MensRights06/10/22 01:58 AM
1

some things regarding women need to be fixed. For example?
/r/MensRights05/10/22 04:12 PM
1

She herself always voted, but she avoided primaries largely because voting in a primary meant signing up for a party Not that I recall, you could declare independent. I have never belonged to any party, but it has not affected my ability to vote in any election. But way back when, if you didn't declare for a major party they would let you use a broken voting booth.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 04:11 PM
2

From the first recognized feminist document, the Declaration of Sentiments, signed in Seneca Falls NY in 1848... https://www.sjsu.edu/people/cynthia.rostankowski/courses/HUM2BS14/s0/Womens-Rights.pdf The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations on the part of man toward woman, having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over her. Now you may see this as equality, but I think any reasonable reading is that this is simply anti-male. It says that not…
/r/MensRights05/10/22 04:07 PM
2

Richardson, 35, of North Road, Westcliff, was arrested on 28 May last year and later charged with perverting the course of justice. She admitted 10 counts at Salisbury Crown Court on 23 May this year. At the same court today (Friday 30 September), she was sentenced to five years and one month in prison. Well what do you know, they named her. Also, she's guilty of crimes against the Crown and the men she falsely accused are not legally victims of anything. Detective Inspector James Holmes, who le…
/r/MensRights05/10/22 02:50 PM
2

By any reasonable definition of the word, I'm a feminist, Feminism is a movement, not a word. Reasonably the feminist movement defines itself by it's words and actions. For example, in 1996 or so US feminists wrote the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) which among other things denies male DV victims recognition as DV victims and denies any resources to male DV victims. But that was not enough, some female abusers were still being arrested and feminism could not support that, so in the next VAWA …
/r/MensRights06/09/22 04:00 PM
2

I think women face a lot more sexual harassment and people creeping on them. Source? Many men here have posted that they've been falsely accused of SH or that when they reported SH at work they were fired. Since SH is effectively defined as something only men can do to only women, there don't seem to be any good numbers here.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 03:57 PM
1

That's good, but the term I'd use is 'cognitive dissonance'. To you I'm an atheist, to god I'm the loyal opposition. - Woody Allen in Without Feathers
/r/MensRights06/09/22 03:54 PM
5

Thousands of new prison places to rehabilitate offenders and cut crime Sixteen prisons across the country to be expanded through new houseblocks and refurbishments. massive construction project to create thousands of jobs for local communities latest step in government’s ambitious plans to create 20,000 places by mid-2020s, helping to cut crime and protect the public. This not about rehabilitation, it's about making more room in prisons for the 19,000 men they think they will be incarcerating. I…
/r/MensRights03/09/22 06:21 PM
2

In fairness to feminism however, there have been notable feminists who argue women should work more, earn more and be self sufficient The idea is that women should not need men, indeed, and that men should have no place in society. And things are progressing in this direction.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 04:06 PM
7

Patriarchy != "patriarchy theory". When a feminist says 'Patriarchy', she means 'Patriarchy Theory'. Patriarchy Theory: All men oppress women for men's benefit. They are quite crystal clear that women are oppressed.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 10:57 PM
1

Since the FBI is not involved in any aspect of law enforcement in any state, they can define anything in their crime report any way they wish, the victims of any crime will be treated as state law dictates (assuming the state follows it's own laws, which is often false). The FBI crime crime report is simply irrelevant here.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 12:04 AM
0

I could tell you the many ways statistics are used to promote misandry in the United States This is more like a meta-analysis than statistical analysis. You take numbers from 50 states which define the same crime differently and come up with some numbers of dubious value. And since none if the states define rape like the FBI's definition, absolutely nothing is changed. It seems you don’t really care, or else you wouldn’t have responded in that way. You can paint something worthless gold, but tha…
/r/MensRights02/09/22 12:00 AM
1

Did you know that up until 2012, men were excluded from the legal definition of rape? If you're talking about the FBI's definition of rape, it has nothing to do with anything, it's a definition used for their crime report. It's not a law in any state and it does not bind the law in any state. It's totally worthless in any way.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 11:29 PM
1

But doesn't it affect men too because now even the man has to raise the unwanted child. You mean unwanted by the man, but his wishes are irrelevant, he's stuck with whatever the women decides. And anyway, she can always drop her newborn off at the nearest fire-station or hospital no questions asked, a sort of post-birth abortion.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 11:22 PM
1

i’d argue this wiring has little to no power compared to the environment the child grows up in. So you're a nurture over nature sort of person. Me, I'd argue that all differences make a difference. it’s gotta be one of the worst excuses you can find to justify not encouraging boys to develop their emotional and social maturity. The words "emotional and social maturity" don't really mean anything, they're vague buzzwords with no inherent value. And maturity is the result of several things, the br…
/r/MensRights29/08/22 04:05 PM
1

With no data, I don't see how you could raise any legal issues. And petitions have no force, I doubt a personal petition would even get a response.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 12:07 AM
3

Of course, I'll just post the text. There are two or three issues I'd been planning on posting about, but reality intruded. Things are more stable now, so we shall see.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 12:05 AM
2

You're welcome.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 12:02 AM
1

I would assume the father would have to petition the court to try and get custody, even tho he is the father. This might be worth looking into. But how can he prove he's the father?
/r/MensRights28/08/22 10:24 PM
3

Thanx. I think many who visit this sub have reason to vent and the will calm down. Then the problem is that many men and women have nothing but feminist training. I'm thinking of doing a post on my observations in AskFeminists. It's astounding on how many posters, commenters and even mods throw the term 'men' around as if all men are responsible for anything and everything. The concept of 'some men' or 'some very few men and women' seems lacking. I may start collecting quotes next time I visit t…
/r/MensRights28/08/22 10:22 PM
1

I've seen this question pop-up in the AskFeminist reddit, relating to OP's dad that believing that a member of the Buffalo Bills (American Football team) should not accused of gang rape against a minor, without being proven guilty. Even though, the defendant admits himself guilty. The police have been successful at forcing innocent people to confess. So I'd not take a confession at face value. This is the first I've heard of this case and I'm not making any claims about it. My point is about the…
/r/MensRights28/08/22 10:15 PM
2

A man has ZERO legal say on if his child is born or not. That’s the most basic. There is also little a father can do to stop a child from being put up for adoption once it’s born. Women can choose “not to parent” in either abortion or adoption. In the US in all 50 states the mother can also drop the newborn off at the nearest hospital or fire station no questions asked.
/r/MensRights28/08/22 10:09 PM
2

I had an argument with someone who tried to tell me that men and women came into existence when the colonizers came to America to set up their patriarchy. Whut? The stupid is strong in this one. I doubt a conversation would actually be possible.
/r/MensRights28/08/22 10:01 PM
1

"It's not men who benefit from traditional gender roles: it's capital. All genders are oppressed equally for the benefit of the men and women in the capitalist class." But the professor is already a Marxist.
/r/MensRights28/08/22 09:59 PM
2

The OPs YouTube says that queens were the aggressors something like 99%+ of the time. Maybe you should watch the video?
/r/MensRights28/08/22 09:56 PM
3

The MRM has, since it's beginnings in the mid-10s, That you may have been late to the party does not affect all those who came before.
/r/MensRights28/08/22 09:54 PM
1

Great research. But at the very end she paints it as a good thing. As I had mentioned previously, the queen had no skin in the war, she stayed safe at the castle, the king on the other hand had to lead the army into battle and kings often did not return.
/r/MensRights28/08/22 09:06 PM
4

If what you are referring to is this... Another BS Feminist Female Talking Point Trashed By Facts I'm not quite sure this is correct. You can hear this from just about any woman and many men, it's not just a feminist talking point. This seems to have made it into the cultural zeitgeist. Mind you I agree that one needs to use great care in choosing the proper words, but in some cases 'woman' is actually the correct term. And in some cases 'feminist' is the correct term too. In this sub 'feminist'…
/r/MensRights28/08/22 09:04 PM
1

Addressing a crowd of supporters after being handily defeated by her former friend and colleague of 30 years, Maloney argued that the twelfth congressional district would lose out because it’s no longer represented by a woman. “I’m really sad that we no longer have a woman representing Manhattan in Congress,” Maloney said, according to the New York Post. “In Congress, it is that when women are at the table, great decisions get made.” Say what? Maloney then gave a shout-out to great female New Yo…
/r/MensRights28/08/22 08:40 PM
1

She was also a powerful champion for the ERA, which would make huge gains towards equality for men (for example it ends the male-only draft, changes custody law, and improves funding for male abuse victims). Yeah, and the 1964 Civil Rights Act made workplace discrimination illegal. No, wait the 1964 CRA was the 'enabling legislation' for Affirmative Action, something the CRA itself quite clearly forbid. The ERA would fare no better than the 1964 CRA. It would be used to cause more discrimination…
/r/MensRights28/08/22 08:36 PM
7

acting as if emotional and social maturity are feminine traits is such a idiotic notion Men and women's brains are wired slightly differently, And girls are said to mature faster. I don't know what "emotional and social maturity" means. But... Like in many countries, the teaching profession in Hungary is dominated by women, accounting for 82 per cent of teachers. Given that 82% of teachers are female, and there is such a thing as female in-group bias, it seems likely that it means boys are judge…
/r/MensRights28/08/22 08:31 PM
1

Such ideas are unacceptable in modern society! Such things are required by Affirmative Action and diversity policies and are enforced by the government through the EEOC.
/r/MensRights28/08/22 08:20 PM
6

Try this... https://archive.ph/NvPJD My boss said ‘we didn’t need another White guy.’ Say what? Reader: I was chatting with one of my bosses the other day about a potential new hire. He let slip that the executive team ultimately did not extend an offer because “we didn’t need another White guy.” He literally said this out loud. I was taken aback. To be clear, the candidate was eminently qualified, had made it through multiple rounds of interviews, and was the clear favorite among almost everyon…
/r/MensRights28/08/22 08:17 PM
8

As I recall the country was Sweden. Although I have not verified the story, the way it goes is that Sweden wrote laws to give preferences to minority students (aka women). Many years later when men were the minority on campus they asked for the preferences the law dictated they should get as a minority student. So Sweden changed the law and got rid of the preferences. Equality, Swedish style.
/r/MensRights28/08/22 08:11 PM
11

I think feminism is good. Tell us about this 'good'. Equality is good. The word 'equality' by itself means nothing. Equality of what? Measured how? Subsequently they get confused, people think All feminism is antimeninism now. Show us this good feminism then.
/r/MensRights28/08/22 06:46 PM
4

Well, to be fair, we (largely conservative men in the US) ARE voting to take away a woman's right to have an abortion. Only the SC votes on SC decisions. In the places where abortion is being banned, both women and men are voting for it.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 04:20 PM
2

The article is paywalled. Try this... https://archive.ph/Kgvex The discriminatory tweet with political overtones comes just days after the US Supreme Court handed down its decision to overturn Roe v Wade, which permitted abortions. Libs of TikTok, which featured the tweet, identified the nurse practitioner as Shawna Harris. More than a dozen visitors to WebMD's healthcare directory, which indicates Harris specialized in family medicine, gave her a 1-star (out of 5 stars) review after the posting…
/r/MensRights26/08/22 04:07 PM
1

Says the 10 hour old account with only one post. And wow, you love using the word troll. Troll Troll Remove yourself from the planet now :) Thanks for confirming you’re a troll Thank you for confirming you’re a troll again.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 04:00 PM
41

The Hungarian Court of Auditors is doing the same, although many concerned observers believe that democracy there is eroding. The authority has now identified what it believes to be an urgent problem: the high proportion of women at Hungarian universities. The academic education makes it difficult for women to find a spouse and start a family. Because women are - unlike educated men - more selective when it comes to their partners. The resulting low birth rate endangers the nation's prosperity. …
/r/MensRights26/08/22 03:48 PM
2

I actually spent several years asking women about this. I always started with a control question. Q: Do you support sexist discrimination in the workplace? Every woman said no. Then I asked about specifics. Q: So you don't support Affirmative Action and Diversity Programs? Much to my surprise, they all did support institutional discrimination against men in the workplace. Many gave feminist justification, some gave no justification at all. I had suspected about half the women would have supporte…
/r/MensRights26/08/22 03:46 PM
1

Do you think most people if simply asked "do you support double standards [or unequal treatment]?" would answer "yes." I think I asked you to provide a citiation.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 03:11 AM
1

Just keep in mind that while most people agree in principle that double standards are doubleplus ungood, Cite?
/r/MensRights26/08/22 02:53 AM
3

AND IT WAS ON THIS SUBREDDIT. Got a link?
/r/MensRights26/08/22 02:52 AM
2

Yes, you asked a question...but the question was stupid, and that's put pretty kindly. Not at all. I've been asking for some evidence of this so-called 'good feminism' for decades and everyone who makes the claim has been as ignorant and clueless as you. But you can't show me what does not exist and you know that, so you attack me. The fact that you make totally baseless claims is not a failing on my part. The fact is, society has always given women pretty much what they asked for. You rejected …
/r/MensRights25/08/22 09:26 PM
0

Your total lack of knowledge is not a failing on my part. As before, you are a feminist apologist with no grounding in the real world. This is pointless, I'm done. You can have the final rant.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 08:17 PM
1

So your asking me to show you that people who don’t hate men exist? Dude are you ok? Since you seem incapable of answering a question I guess it's not unexpected that you can't scan back a few comments and make sure you even remember what the question was. Misandrists hiding behind the name of feminism ≠ actual feminists So where are these 'actual feminists'? Just saying man some feminists actually do care and notice how unfair society can be. And if they exist, you should be able to show me the…
/r/MensRights25/08/22 08:15 PM
1

You've already proved that you don't know the origins of the feminist movement, or what their initial goals were. No, I asked you a question. Don't worry pal. We all want the good parts of femenism to stay. Please tell us about these good parts. But you don't know how to answer questions. But you could get the Olympic gold metal for jumping to conclusions, were that an Olympic event. I'm not your teacher That is, you have no clue what you are talking about and think you can cover it up by attack…
/r/MensRights25/08/22 12:30 AM
9

Last I heard we just did not know what a woman was.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 12:26 AM
1

You know, whenever an article from the DM or the Sun or whatever is posted, I normally read at least a few pages of comments, and I don't recall seeing this at all. Also, on the net, no one can tell whether you are male or female, so if you have seen something, you don't know whether it was posted by a man or a woman.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 11:35 PM
3

Oh, so you haven't read any history? You could've just said so. If you're just making stuff up as you go along you could've just said so. If you can't back anything you say and won't even try, you could've just said so.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 11:32 PM
2

The courts will legislate from the bench because patriarchy. OK, this is a lost cause. You can have the final word.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 11:28 PM
3

So you are incapable of believing in the possibility that not all people who classify themselves as feminists are misandrist assholes, ok. I'm not asking for a theoretical exposition, but a demonstration of reality on the ground. You are the one claiming these feminists exist. If they exist, you should be able to show me they exist. How is it that you can't show me?
/r/MensRights24/08/22 11:25 PM
1

Well, a recent list also placed the US as one of the 10 most dangerous places for women. https://archive.ph/ImZIi Experts say U.S. among 10 most dangerous nations for women 1. India 2. Afghanistan 3. Syria 4. Somalia 5. Saudi Arabia 6. Pakistan 7. Democratic Republic of Congo 8. Yemen 9. Nigeria 10. United States So I'm not sure how much I trust claims like this.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 03:46 PM
18

Misandrists hiding behind the name of feminism ≠ actual feminists So where are these 'actual feminists'? Just saying man some feminists actually do care and notice how unfair society can be. And if they exist, you should be able to show me they exist, please show me.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 03:42 PM
14

You don't want women to vote or to work at all? Whatever you're taking, I suggest reducing the dosage. Have you read any history in your life? Can you show me these feminists advocating equal treatment in the workplace instead of preferences for women?
/r/MensRights24/08/22 03:40 PM
1

The UK doesn't really have any overarching equality law now it's left the EU so far as I know. Are EU rulings binding after BREXIT?
/r/MensRights24/08/22 03:35 PM
0

I think you're missing the point. I'm asking you a question. Show me this 'patriarchy' you speak of.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 03:32 PM
14

Realistic equal opportunities for men and women? Show me the feminists advocating for equal treatment in the workplace instead of preferences for women.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 03:32 PM
1

Wife says I cook "dirty" so she won't let me in the kitchen. You need a dirty kitchen.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 03:27 PM
3

Please, people, avoid Filipinas like the plague. Totally insane women. There are many quite sane Filipinas, but the ones who go abroad are often those who are totally insane persuasion. There was a story a few years back about a retired German man begging on the streets in the Philippines (don't recall the location) to feed his children. Seems one morning he woke up and his wife had absconded with his life savings and retirement and he was left destitute with kids to feed.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 02:59 PM
3

Men glorify older woman taking advantage of young boys Where?
/r/MensRights24/08/22 02:54 PM
14

Don't worry pal. We all want the good parts of femenism to stay. Please tell us about these good parts.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 02:52 PM
27

"The week the women left" Wow, I'd not heard of this. https://www.producer.com/farmliving/the-week-the-women-left/ For many women it’s a secret dream. They suspect their family could not survive without them even for a week. At the end of May, the people in the central Alberta town of Hardisty found the answer to the question when a Vancouver film company moved in to film a television documentary about what happens in a community when most of the women leave. They discovered that when the women …
/r/MensRights24/08/22 02:40 PM
12

This is not theoretical, we actually have evidence of what can and will happen. Look in the US, fewer goods on the shelves, why lack of truck drivers. We still drivers but not as many same with the doc workers. People are freaking because when the go to the store and see empty shelves they have no idea what to do That happened when the Covid lockdown started, I took pictures of the empty shelves. And let's not even talk about toilet paper. The thing is, unless I'm unusual, I have frozen, refrige…
/r/MensRights24/08/22 02:03 PM
1

he point is they both boil down to the same core ideal, which is "You're different than me, therefore you're inferior". If that's what you think Star Wars is about, I don't know what more to say. The story needed an antagonist, so they invented one, one who is simply evil. Not only is the major protagonist (Luke Skywalker) not different from the major antagonist (Darth Vader) by race or species, they are father and son. So let's just agree to disagree.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 01:51 PM
0

The courts will legislate from the bench because patriarchy. Show me this 'patriarchy'.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 01:44 PM
2

And the courts will tolerate it just because Patriarchy. What patriarchy?
/r/MensRights24/08/22 12:03 AM
1

While their numbers were small, there was both Brazilians in Europe (infantry) The Brazilians were not being invaded by the Nazis, they were one of the few countries not directly involved in the war to join the Axis and send troops to fight. and Mexicans in the Philippines (Air Force). They were fighting the Japanese, not the Nazis. I know many Filipinos who have not forgotten the Bataan Death March. They have a pretty nice (if small) museum there. Oh, and those Chinese that fought against the J…
/r/MensRights24/08/22 12:03 AM
1

A lot of people assume sexist law is illegal but it's not. I'm laying people know that States can and will turn on their men and it's legal. Actually it's not legal. The Constitution supposedly grants 'equal protection under the law'. The 1964 Civil Rights Act specifically and in great detail prohibits discrimination on the basis of race and sex. In CA the Unhrue Civil Right Act grants the same protections as the 1964 CRA. The CA Constitution grants the same rights. Unfortunately, in abeyance of…
/r/MensRights23/08/22 11:49 PM
19

Countries where rape is legal. In which country is it illegal for a woman to rape a man? In the UK women legally cannot commit the act of rape. Nor can they in India.
/r/AntiFeminists23/08/22 04:10 PM
16

I respectfully disagree. The literal definition of feminism is to believe in equality. Feminism is not a word, it's a movement. If you want to know what feminism is about look at what the feminist movement says, does and advocates. For example, in 1996 or so US feminists wrote the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) which among other things denies male DV victims recognition as DV victims and denies any resources to male DV victims. But that was not enough, some female abusers were still being arr…
/r/AntiFeminists23/08/22 04:09 PM
30

When was it about equality for you? And when do you think that stopped? Feminism has never been about equality, it's always straight-up woman's advocacy. From the first recognized feminist document, the Declaration of Sentiments signed in 1848 at Seneca Falls NY. https://www.womenshistory.org/sites/default/files/document/2019-08/Day%203_0.pdf The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations on the part of man toward woman, having in direct object the establishment of an a…
/r/AntiFeminists23/08/22 04:05 PM
-1

"Race" is a very nebulous term. A chimp may have DNA that's 95% the same as humans, but chimps are not a different race. It can mean entirely different creatures (like humans VS other primates) No, it does not. You just made that up. Jabba the Hut is not a different race either. He's a different species entirely. The Stormtroopers and the Empire in Star Wars are very clearly an allegory for Nazi Germany. The point I'm making is that Star Wars is not an allegory to WWII. And your inserting race i…
/r/MensRights23/08/22 03:55 PM
1

The article is about the RAF, the Royal Air Force, in the UK (not Canada). White patriarchy is anti America and therefore states may use this as a basis for any law. Are you a feminist by any chance? If so the intended action should make you very happy. https://news.sky.com/story/complete-nonsense-if-raf-is-pausing-job-offers-for-white-men-over-impossible-diversity-targets-javid-says-12674947 'Complete nonsense' if RAF is 'pausing job offers for white men' over 'impossible' diversity targets, Ja…
/r/MensRights23/08/22 03:48 PM
1

Successive governments have been challenging all three armed services - the RAF, the army and the Royal Navy - for years to improve their diversity statistics in what has traditionally been a predominately white, male profession. It is a goal championed by defence chiefs. The MOD has announced it aims to increase the ratio of female recruits coming into the Armed Forces in general to 30% by 2030 from around 12%. The RAF is aiming to go further. It is seeking for the ratio of female air force rec…
/r/MensRights23/08/22 03:41 PM
0

This whole thinking of "Oh, Russia is white, Germany White, all of Europe is white" is a very American way of thinking. In Europe, they drew and still often continue to draw ethnic distinctions between different regions of Europe You were the one claiming racism. Ethnic distinctions are something else. and you do it again... And the Empire in Star Wars, with extremely few exceptions, is Human-first and very xenophobic and racist towards non-humans. I'm not sure that 'racism' is a valid label or …
/r/MensRights23/08/22 02:28 PM
1

Considering how the Empire is quite obviously based on Nazi Germany, I don't think you're making the point you think you're making. Was not Germany in WWII invading other countries in Europe (aka white) and also Russia (also white)? The only non-white combatants in WWII were the Japanese, and the Germans did not fight in that theatre. So I don't see the direct comparison to WWII.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 01:59 PM
3

Proving an accusation was intentionaly false is sadly as difficult as proving a rape, if not more. Since it is not necessary to prove that a rape occurred, either on campus or in a criminal trial, you don't have a valid point. And a great many prosecutors have said that they don't think it's in the public's interest to put false rape accusers on trial, so they don't charge even provable false rape accusations most of the time.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 01:36 PM
3

Nearly four years after a woman ended an unwanted pregnancy with abortion pills obtained at a Phoenix clinic, she finds herself mired in an ongoing lawsuit over that decision. A judge allowed the woman’s ex-husband to establish an estate for the embryo, which had been aborted in its seventh week of development. The ex-husband filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the clinic and its doctors in 2020, alleging that physicians failed to obtain proper informed consent from the woman as required by A…
/r/MensRights22/08/22 03:40 PM
3

Men created it. Well, that's probably true but no one really knows. It seems to have originated in Mesopotamia a very long time ago. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_astrology ( There is scattered evidence to suggest that the oldest known astrological references are copies of texts made during this period, particularly in Mesopotamia (Sumer, Akkad, Assyria and Babylonia). Two, from the Venus tablet of Ammisaduqa (compiled in Babylon round 1700 BC) are reported to have been made during th…
/r/MensRights22/08/22 03:30 PM
2

The feminist religion is run by women.
/r/MensRights22/08/22 03:25 PM
3

making something foolproof is that they always make a bigger fool. Sounds like a quote of Douglas Adams. “A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools.”
/r/MensRights22/08/22 02:46 PM
4

My main point is that clearly 99% of these women aren’t lying Please, post your source for this. Are you an advocate of #believethewoman by any chance? when in most cases women don’t have much to gain from a false accusation. How nice of you to make that decision for women. So if a man rejects a woman, would you say that's enough for her to falsely accuse him of rape? Why or why not?
/r/MensRights22/08/22 02:38 PM
2

Turkey, which once ratified the Convention, has since denounced it. Hungary was at issue here. I'm not sure why you mention the Istanbul Convention. Is it because you know about its detrimental impact, or because you believe the propaganda around it? I approve withdrawing from the convention. It's a good thing for both men and women in Hungary. The UK is anti-male enough as it is, the IC will just make things worse for men. Turkey withdrawing from the IC is another good thing.
/r/MensRights22/08/22 02:04 PM
1

I know it’s rough, girls don’t wanna fuck you…but trust me there’s an evolutionary advantage for women being choosy about their mates and not allowing you guys to spread your genes. Women would be spreading their own genes. And your idea of an "evolutionary advantage" is interesting in that it involves not reproducing.
/r/MensRights22/08/22 01:58 PM
1

I'm a bit confused by the news articles, but Hungary has either withdrawn from or refused to ratify the Istanbul Convention. https://www.dw.com/en/istanbul-convention-how-a-european-treaty-against-womens-violence-became-politicized/a-56953987 Hungary and Bulgaria have also distanced themselves from the Istanbul Convention. The two countries, both signatories to the treaty, have measures in place indicating plans to further distance themselves from ratifying the convention. In 2020, Hungary's par…
/r/MensRights22/08/22 01:49 PM
1

I don't know if im reading way past this, so pls correct me if im wrong, but essentially you're saying women are casual when they rape men; therefore men should do the same? I don't even understand what you are saying here. Fight fire with fire? Aren't we all losers in the end? I'm just explaining reality on the ground.
/r/MensRights22/08/22 01:15 PM
3

Government subsidy is a blunt instrument, but we can learn from the pro-family measures which the Hungarian Prime Minister, Viktor Orban – a controversial figure in the liberal West – has introduced to boost his country's flagging birth rate. Married Hungarian women under 40 can apply for government-backed loans of up to 10 million Hungarian forint (about £22,000), to help them start a family. The debt is wiped after three or more children. Other measures include home-buying help, again continge…
/r/MensRights21/08/22 07:56 PM
1

Maybe if you explained it to us? Type slowly, OK?
/r/MensRights21/08/22 07:30 PM
2

Rather some strains of feminism label such things as tools of the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights21/08/22 07:30 PM
2

Why would you, a woman, believe that this sub is correct in their ways of thinking? Are you saying women are not individuals who can think for themselves? Did you vote for Hillary because and only because she is a woman?
/r/MensRights21/08/22 07:28 PM
2

Women voted in the colonies. https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/94209/5-very-early-stories-about-american-women-and-voting PROPERTIED SINGLE WOMEN VOTE IN EARLY NEW JERSEY. In 1776, New Jersey rewrote its constitution upon transitioning from colony to state. The new constitution defined eligible voters as “all inhabitants” over 21 years old who owned property worth £50 and had resided in their New Jersey county for at least 12 months [PDF]. The language “all inhabitants” reflects a situation un…
/r/MensRights21/08/22 07:24 PM
2

Well, a friend gave a brief review of the latest Thor movie and I think that's another one to skip. At first I watching superhero movies from superhero movie fatigue. Then came Captain Marvel, seeing what happened with Rotten Tomatoes and watching a few review YT videos kind of did it for Marvel movies. Generally, it looks like all the Marvel movies are a skip now, the DC movies are not there yet, at least not the few I've seen. As for other movies, I'll read some reviews (and the comments) to d…
/r/MensRights21/08/22 07:13 PM
2

So it's their own fault for being raped? When a woman rapes an underage boy. the law holds the boy at fault. But when rape has been expanded to things like affirmative consent, where if the woman does not yell 'yes, yes. yes' enthusiastically enough every step of the way and if the man forgets to ask permission for something, I'm not even sure rape should be a crime, much less a felony. No doubt you disagree. And next day regrets for consensual sex, well, I don't see that as a crime, but the law…
/r/MensRights21/08/22 07:06 PM
1

i believe it was only white, landowning men right? Can you show me where it says that in the Constitution?
/r/MensRights21/08/22 06:53 PM
3

and when this sort of unfairness is right in front of them they do begin to question it. Up till now they have not, at least not in any meaningful numbers.
/r/MensRights19/08/22 01:18 PM
1

Which movement are you claiming sends "Black people to jail"?
/r/MensRights19/08/22 01:16 PM
1

Pretty inconceivable how your own "movement" does exactly what you claim to be against. Say what?
/r/MensRights19/08/22 04:21 AM
9

Know who else sees this? Moms of boys - all good until it hits close to home So where are these moms objecting?
/r/MensRights19/08/22 03:20 AM
1

The woman is because I was afraid people would think I'm a straight/white/cis/male asking for more privillege. Asking for "more" privilege? Please elucidate. But call me woke. From what I've read so far, it does not seem inappropriate.
/r/MensRights19/08/22 03:12 AM
0

I'd like to point out that hermaphrodites exist and that on its own should be enough to have non binary as a gender. Sexual reproduction is not perfect, the chromosomes don't always combine correctly, you have many variations of chromosomal disorders, most of which are not viable and spontaneously abort. Some chromosomal disorder are viable, and we call these individuals 'intersex'. They are not a third sex, they may be XXY (Klinefelter syndrome) or YYX (Jacob's syndrome) or any of a wide variet…
/r/MensRights19/08/22 03:05 AM
0

That's like arguing that we need to find a way to include white people in BLM. One might argue that all lives matter, or that white lives matter too. The police kill more white men than black man but since white lives don't matter, it's not an issue. Anyway, BLM is about the destruction of the nuclear family. https://archive.ph/mi2Ro BLM site removes page on ‘nuclear family structure’ amid NFL vet’s criticism The group, whose co-founder Patrisse Cullors has described herself and fellow co-founde…
/r/MensRights19/08/22 02:47 AM
4

Maybe we should make white people slaves because black people once were also hey? Black people in Africa also enslaved whites, there was even a white slave trade. https://www.ancient-origins.net/ancient-places-africa/white-slaves-barbary-002171 Remembering the Barbary Slaves: White Slaves and North African Pirates Much attention and condemnation has been directed towards the tragedy of the African slave trade , which took place between the 16th and the 19th centuries. However, another equally de…
/r/MensRights19/08/22 02:31 AM
3

Just leave the addams family alone. The recent stuff, I already have. But I have most seasons of the original 1960s sitcom on DVD, those are worth watching despite not being true to the original comic.
/r/MensRights19/08/22 02:26 AM
1

A woman does a little infidelity, she ain't gonna get shit, or run away to the Bahamas with a boyfriend half her age. Can you name these countries?
/r/AntiFeminists17/08/22 02:24 AM
10

More than that, on a social level (if marriage is a common practice, or a standard form of behavior) it benefits men because most men will be able to secure a partner in a long-term relationship, as well as having access to intimacy. Neither of which is guaranteed in a marriage.
/r/AntiFeminists15/08/22 06:30 AM
2

Indeed, the 'bachelor tax' is a thing. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bachelor_tax Bachelor tax A bachelor tax is a punitive tax imposed on unmarried men. In the modern era, many countries do vary tax rates by marital status, so current references to bachelor taxes are typically implicit rather than explicit; and given the state of tax law is very complicated, as tax accountancy concepts like income splitting can come into play.\1][2]) Such explicit measures historically would be instituted as pa…
/r/AntiFeminists15/08/22 06:27 AM
1

The first human societies, which thrived for 100,000 years before class first emerged some 10,000 years ago, were what cultural anthropologists refer to as "acephalous," which is Greek for "without a head." Since there was no written language 10,000 years ago, all we have is speculation based upon artifacts like clay pots. This claim is overreaching the evidence.
/r/AntiFeminists15/08/22 06:20 AM
3

Women are the ones that are stuck with a child after pregnancy, not men. In all 50 states they can drop off their newborn at the nearest fire station or hospital and wash their hands of caring for a child. So in the US at least, you are wrong.
/r/AntiFeminists15/08/22 06:17 AM
3

but at least the divorce court is fair. Whut?
/r/AntiFeminists15/08/22 06:13 AM
1

What way specifically do you want me to prove? Which part don't you understand? I repeat, show me how the 'trans movement was an ally of MRAs' as you claim.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 03:41 PM
15

if so how many is to many ? Best Guess: Too many = one.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 07:27 PM
18

The original VAWA was sponsored in Congress by Joe Biden.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 07:26 PM
1

Bringing something into the country that you are not allowed to is smuggling. What you intend to do with it afterwards is irrelevant. Bringing certain cheeses into the US is against the law. But it carries a fine, not a prison sentence. There is a difference between a civil offense and a felony. Which is which is decided by each country or state.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 01:12 AM
1

Unless you know that this is the law in Russia, it's speculation, just like my clearly labeled comment. And most states recognize the difference between 'personal use' and 'dealer'. At any rate, some other commenter left this... Cannabis in Russia is illegal. Possession of up to 6 grams (or two grams of hashish) is an administrative offense, punishable by a fine or detention of 15 days. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannabis_in_Russia This is all about geopolitic
/r/MensRights06/08/22 01:08 AM
1

Maybe I'm not well informed, but is not 'smuggling' sneaking illegal substances into a country for resale? That is, if the item is for personal use, it's not being smuggled. That being said possession of illegal items is a crime in itself. So as near as I can tell the smuggling charge is bogus and at worse she should face the appropriate penalty for possession of illegal items, which someone else posted was like 15 days for cannabis. That being said, as many have commented, this is about politic…
/r/MensRights05/08/22 04:05 PM
2

Agree, I was trying to be positive that feminism isn’t 100% how you described it, modern feminism I'd be very interested to see the parts of feminism that are different.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 02:49 PM
1

Can men be oppressed? So you're a Marxist then.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 02:15 AM
3

I don’t excuse it I've been reading your comments, and yes you do. but if someone is genuinely interested in both men’s and women’s rights and is willing to have civil conversation without all the venomous name calling I’m willing to listen and talk. If you were actually fighting for equal protection under the law this would not matter. To expand on what I mean I’ve met women that genuinely want equality The word 'equality' by itself means nothing. Tell me exactly what they advocate for and supp…
/r/MensRights05/08/22 02:12 AM
1

You can be for equal rights and specialize your own fight. I'm mra. I don't oppose women's fights where it's needed. I just specialize in men's issues because not enough people care Show me a single issue where there's a sunset clause on the pro-female/anti-male sexism feminism demands and supports. My friends are against MGM and FGM. In my experience that's false. Women and feminists don't oppose MGM, the strongest you'll get is the claim that they don't support it. But they do in fact support …
/r/MensRights05/08/22 02:07 AM
1

Feminism: Kill All Men. Feminism: Men should be reduced to 10% of the population, be kept in camps and used only for breeding. Feminism: Women can't be sexist, can't rape men and can't commit DV against men. Reality seems a bit deeper than your analysis to me.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 01:56 AM
2

Just like we can support both fucking sides. Feminism does not. Feminism has written laws that define all DV as male against female and requires the arrest of male DV victims of females. I understand that to you that's equality. Feminism has also been instrumental in making sure that the definition of rape as an act committed with a penis, that is women cannot rape men, even if they did the exact same thing that would be rape if done by a man. This is feminist equality, women cannot commit crime…
/r/MensRights05/08/22 01:26 AM
5

It’s the kind that say all men are trash, all men are predators, women would be better off if we killed all men, down with the patriarchy, all men are rapists..it’s the venom and hatred that they spew out that is the issue. Another issue is that virtually no women or feminist oppose even the most blatant misandry by the feminist movement, like you they excuse it and continue to support the movement.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 01:21 AM
2

i agree with OP - but also agree with you maybe a bit more. feminism started out as a good idea but at some point Feminism was always abut hating men. From the first recognized feminist document, the Declaration of Sentiments signed in 1848 at Seneca Falls NY. https://www.nps.gov/wori/learn/historyculture/declaration-of-sentiments.htm The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations on the part of man toward woman, having in direct object the establishment of an absolute …
/r/MensRights05/08/22 01:17 AM
2

I have friends who switch to women's rights advocates instead, because they don't want to block men's rights, but just want to work more on women issues So they are not about equal rights either. Don't worry if you don't understand. often because they don't feel they know enough about men's rights How can you fight for equality while being willfully ignorant about half the human race? But we've already established that they are not fighting for equal rights, they are fighting for women's rights.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 01:15 AM
2

You had to find shit didn't you lol Show us something that's not shit then. And it's obvious by now that you don't give a fuck about what the feminist movement actually does and says, so you don't even believe in what you lie that feminism is all about yourself.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 01:10 AM
1

My whole point is that feminism shouldn't be called feminism...most "feminists" are "egalitarians", "humanists" or whatever the fuck you want to call it. Show us.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 01:06 AM
2

I want equal rights and control of my own body! That's what MRAs want for men and the feminist movement opposes every effort to attain such.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 10:29 PM
6

If I am a feminist, then im also a masculinist. If you're a feminist, you support every anti-male action and word of the feminist movement by lending it your support. The feminist movement not only is not for men, equal rights and fair and equal treatment, it opposes them. For example, in 1996 or so feminists wrote the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) which among other things denies male DV victims recognition as DV victims and denies any resources to male DV victims. But that was not enough, s…
/r/MensRights04/08/22 04:15 PM
3

Welcome to the club. It has about 334K members plus lurkers. Sorry, you're too late for the pizza party.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 05:59 PM
14

They will also ban you if you comment or post here. Sorry.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 05:01 AM
1

I've seen predictions of the end of feminism for at least 30 years. Also flying cars. I ain't seen either.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 04:03 AM
3

And 99.? percent of men don't commit SA, rape, or DV.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 03:51 AM
1

Your claim that MRAs are acting like feminists. That's all the sentence I responded to said, so I don't see why you are confused. EDIT: Actually on rereading its' not clear whom you say is acting like whom. Can you clarify? Either way it seem to be blaming MRAs though.
/r/MensRights29/07/22 04:27 PM
2

They choose to have sex so they have to suffer the consequences, to which I don’t agree with Men don't have to choose to have sex though, a man is legally responsible for the wife's child by an affair. A man (or boy) raped by a woman is legally responsible for Child Support. A single mother who claims any state support has no responsibility to pay the state back. They hunt down the man she names as the father and gives him the entire bill, often with fees and interest. If he can't pay he will go…
/r/MensRights29/07/22 04:24 PM
2

Hot take but being forced to carry a child is more violent. Pregnancy and childbirth are natural processes, they proceed only if there is no force. Now to terminate the pregnancy, that's where force comes into play. She made the choice to have sex and risk pregnancy, these are the natural consequences, and no law can change that.
/r/MensRights29/07/22 04:14 PM
1

I’m genuinely trying to find the way men want to go about the decision of having a child. Generally, that's not a decision men have the power to make.
/r/MensRights29/07/22 04:11 PM
3

Its even worst. Men loose rights for his DNA the moment sperm leave his body. It's even worse, there is absolutely no requirement that the man assessed child support be the child's father.
/r/MensRights29/07/22 04:10 PM
2

Modern feminism - for instance - that mens rights groups so seemly despise. And yet they act just like them? Say what?
/r/MensRights29/07/22 04:08 PM
6

If it was switched around and men had the babies, Then they would be females, not males. Nothing would change.
/r/MensRights28/07/22 04:15 PM
12

Abortion is not now and never was a right. Roe vs Wade was a SC decision, the SC does not have the power to create a right. The roe vs wade decision was political, the lower court invented some 'privacy rights' in the penumbra of the constitution that simply do not exist. The SC, which is supposed to rule on constitutionality decided not to that day and ruled by politics. Overturning RvW does not make abortion illegal. It simply makes it a state's rights matter, as it was before RvW. To some ext…
/r/MensRights28/07/22 04:10 PM
1

I repeat, show me how the 'trans movement was an ally of MRAs' as you claim. If you don't, and I suspect you can't, that makes it more likely than not that your claim is false.
/r/MensRights27/07/22 07:39 PM
1

Let's just say there's an element of risk in dating today that did not exist in the past. Among other things men have been falsely accused of sexual assault violence, sometimes years after they had dated or been in a relationship with a woman. One woman even raped her ex-bg at Machete point. And it does not matter that an accusation is false, innocence is not a defense.
/r/MensRights27/07/22 07:37 PM
1

Tell me more about these environmental effects Insane water requirements. Involvement of cartels. Formation of armed militia. Interesting, but here in CA we get HASS avocados, grown more or less locally and with no gang involvement. And the gangs will go after anyone with money they can take, it has nothing to do with avocados per se. Argue that point with someone making that claim. OP made the claim. Then that's who you need to argue this point with. It's not that difficult.
/r/MensRights26/07/22 04:03 PM
2

The Netherlands is very strict with rape accusations. In some cases this is a bad thing because you can’t always provide proof. But the Netherlands requires solid, concrete proof if a woman or man was raped. And if someone lies about being raped then there is a huge fine and I believe even a prison sentence. Got a link? This is just one example. The Netherlands is very highly advanced and I’ve never heard a single person complain about the country in terms of sexism and even race My bad, I had m…
/r/MensRights26/07/22 02:29 PM
-1

Yields are an important factor. The point I was making with the example of avocados is that it is primarily profit driven despite being destructive to the environment. Is there some sector of agriculture that's not profit driven? We have friggin acres of avocado farms despite it having hugely negative environmental impacts. Tell me more about these environmental effects. I still don't get how suggesting for Quality of Life crop options translates to "Now PLANTS are sexist...." Argue that point w…
/r/MensRights26/07/22 02:17 PM
2

The idea of NATO is that if you attack any NATO country it's considered an attack on all NATO countries. So if Russia attacked any NATO country, the US would have to get involved. If the Ukraine were in NATO, the US would have boots on the ground and aircraft in the air in that war.
/r/MensRights26/07/22 02:14 PM
0

So don't tell me we are only focusing on yields for resolving world hunger. Maybe I'm ignorant, but I can't see how yields cannot be an important factor.
/r/MensRights26/07/22 02:14 AM
2

Higher yield = higher profits Maybe, depends on how much these higher yields cost.
/r/MensRights26/07/22 02:12 AM
10

the same DAY, the newspaper was claiming "heatwaves affect women more than men"...! Wait, I was told that Air Conditioning discriminated against women.
/r/MensRights26/07/22 02:09 AM
6

She choose Invisibility and Flight. I choose Reality and Time Manipulation. Who wins? She chose to be protected, but has no offensive capability. That won't win a battle. I would imagine that reality manipulation would allow you to win, it could nullify her abilities, but she's your daughter. So it's a tie.
/r/MensRights26/07/22 02:04 AM
11

However, the Netherlands is a very developed country and I never saw any kind of sexism there A lot of men posting from various Nordic countries the Netherlands have had a different take. One example was in Sweden, preferences for college admissions were given to women, seems there were not enough women, so they were given preferences. Eventually, as these things always work out, men became a minority in college and asked for the preferences written into law. The law was changed and preferences …
/r/MensRights26/07/22 01:46 AM
3

I personally hope that we get our shit together and make wars happen less, Unless we are starting the wars, it's not our act. What we need to do is get out of NATO or any similar pacts that force our involvement.
/r/MensRights26/07/22 01:39 AM
3

Let this sink in: I've figured that Rwanda genocide was about killing exclusively men only after one Rwandan lady complained that after genocide, 70% of the population are women and they are struggling with finding partners. I'd not heard about this, thanx. Was not this genocide lead my many women?
/r/MensRights26/07/22 01:36 AM
7

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQNBQI3UDag Donovan - Mellow Yellow (Audio) I have no idea what this song is about, but I like it.
/r/MensRights26/07/22 01:33 AM
7

Alright so a woman here and I've been considering that maybe both genders are oppressed in different parts of the world and aspects of life? Oppression is a Marxist device to drive two factions apart. It's worked in a lot of places and hundreds of millions of those countries citizens have been killed by the government that supposedly supports 'the workers'. If you want to go down this path, then life does not matter to you. And since there's both female and male bad people, then it would make se…
/r/MensRights26/07/22 01:30 AM
1

I'm sure there are some detractors in the industry. Radical feminists being the main ones obviously. But it's getting harder and harder to ignore this if you care about facts and data. The DV industry is run by feminists, and the VAWA and Duluth Model were both written by feminists. Are you suggesting that the wind is going to change direction here?
/r/MensRights25/07/22 02:00 AM
1

Very nice, but the specific issue raised was in response to this... More women are hospitalised in domestic violence because men are larger and stronger. So the question is whether men or women require more hospitalization because of DV. It's not clear whether or not most of the injured men seek medical aid. And women are more likely to seek aid for even small things if I understand this correctly.
/r/MensRights25/07/22 01:58 AM
2

Technically speaking, any good feminist who is not a radical should (ironically) be against most of the feminist institutional establishment, including it's influence in academia. We've had many feminists post here, and many denizens of this sub inform her (usually a her) of what feminism actually does and says. I've not seen a one who will object to the worst misandry by the feminist movement.
/r/MensRights25/07/22 01:49 AM
3

Some people dudes on here say downright batshit things You don't have any way of knowing if a poster is a dude or dudette.
/r/MensRights24/07/22 10:07 PM
1

So women are all unsayable bc lots of men have had bad experiences? Unsayable? What?
/r/MensRights24/07/22 09:40 PM
2

Here are some of the findings from PASK: Among large population samples, 57.9% of IPV reported was bi-directional, 42% unidirectional; 13.8% of the unidirectional violence was male to female (MFPV), 28.3% was female to male (FMPV) Among school and college samples, percentage of bidirectional violence was 51.9%; 16.2% was MFPV and 31.9% was FMPV Male and female IPV perpetrated from similar motives – primarily to get back at a partner for emotionally hurting them, because of stress or jealousy, to…
/r/MensRights24/07/22 12:15 PM
2

There's quite a bit of research that disagrees with that. Women are more likely to pick up weapons and things like kitchen knives. And men often don't defend themselves. So there's a plethora of data showing higher rates of male victims who show up in hospitals and doctor's offices for injuries that they sustained from a partner. I'd love to see this research. The thing is, hospitals are required to ask any injured woman if she was injured by her husband or bf. There is not only no such requirem…
/r/MensRights24/07/22 12:03 PM
1

You're free to disagree. But I think progress is still progress no matter how small, and this seems pretty big to me. Show me the progress on the ground, the changes to the law or instructions given to the police. The VAWA + Duluth Model remains the law of the land and I don't see this book changing anything.
/r/MensRights24/07/22 11:57 AM
3

Feminists may mean well (and let's be honest, most who are in the real world probably do), If by 'mean well' you mean writing laws that deny that men can be victims of DV, deny male DV victims any resources and literally require the arrest of male DV victims of females, perhaps. Me, I remain skeptical.
/r/MensRights24/07/22 11:43 AM
3

which include an exaggerated focus on males as perpetrators and females as victims This is required by law thanx to the feminist written VAWA and the feminist written Duluth Model.
/r/MensRights24/07/22 11:41 AM
2

I think we're starting to get past the chilling effect that feminists had in the industry, at least inside of academia. What events are you aware of that supports this conclusion?
/r/MensRights24/07/22 11:40 AM
3

Every taxpayer in effect pays CS.
/r/MensRights24/07/22 11:29 AM
9

I've seen this kind of thing going on since the 1990s. I don't necessarily have any issues if the couple were married as long as the terms of his will are not affected, the wife will probably get everything already. But if affects the terms of his will, it should not be done. But if it's a bf/gf relationship I absolutely object, it's wrong under all circumstances.. And if the man is in a coma and might recover, I also absolutely object. Estate issues aside, I'm pretty sure that the sperm extract…
/r/MensRights23/07/22 10:00 PM
13

I don't think the Istanbul Convention, awful as it is, will affect the UK's handling of DV because the UK has been outdoing the IC for decades. But additionally it requires brainwashing children, and it may make the UK's existent brainwashing worse. Will the insanity ever stop?
/r/MensRights23/07/22 09:41 PM
2

Just because boy victims can’t get pregnant is no reason for society to ignore them. But they don't ignore them, they assign them child support. I write about this law to my congressmen in my state It's not a law, it's a precedent setting court decision.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 10:13 PM
2

This is horrible. I hope this court case is overturned. It's been over 30 years, I think it's too late to appeal the case.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 10:08 PM
5

This was a US Supreme Court case Minor correction, it was the Kansas Supreme Court if I'm not mistaken. I feel as though if everyone started protesting, within years people would start consider paying attention to us. Can you show one example of that working in the past?
/r/MensRights22/07/22 10:05 PM
6

Yep. But on the flip-side, a man having sex with a woman is presumed to be rape on his part.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 10:04 PM
1

Ok so you know I want equality. I don't know what you want. And it's not for lack of asking. I know that nobody has all the answers, but everybody has all the answers. I have questions. All policies such as affirmative action are political experiments. I see. They are not violations of the Civil and Constitutional rights of a group of people, they're just political experiment. They are either successful, or they fail So you don't see any issues with wholesale discrimination against men? Colour m…
/r/MensRights22/07/22 10:02 PM
22

I did not look at the woman's list, but the vast majority of the scholarships for men are for fraternity members and other subsets of men, like African-Americans. For example... The Iris-Samuel Rothman Scholarship is for a young man who has lost his mother and father or a young man who has lost his mother and does not have a father available to him. It is for students currently enrolled in or having been accepted to a New England college or university. The amount is variable depending on the fun…
/r/MensRights22/07/22 09:55 PM
9

Hmm, the paper is 2012 but the data is from 2001-2003. Abstract and Figures Using data from the United States Sentencing Commission (2001-2003), we examine the role of gender in the sentencing of defendants in federal courts. We address two questions: First, can we explain the gender gap in sentencing by taking into account differences in legal and extralegal factors? And second, do legal and extralegal factors have the same impact for male and female defendants? Overall, we find that female def…
/r/MensRights22/07/22 09:41 PM
1

Ive been divorced before, i know the game, but you cant move forward like tyou want me to with a new partner. I don't have any idea what you are talking about, I've made no such suggestion. But honestly, i care a lot more my relationship and my child than i do planning for the worst case scenario. Planning is useless, you will be up against the vast coercive power of the state. And in reality, what youre doing is labelling all women because the stats are kind of unfavourable in terms of their be…
/r/MensRights22/07/22 08:39 PM
1

I see how it works on here. People try to pin me down to answering this ONE question they have in the EXACT phrasing they INSIST women use the EXACT phrasing they requested or THEY GET MAD. This is two things. Stupid A lie I can answer the question all day Sorry, you can't even answer simple yes or no questions. Most people have no difficulty answering simple questions like this, but with you getting any kind of answer is near impossible.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 08:35 PM
1

I do not support affirmative action. But you also don't oppose it. I’ve already given you my opinion I just didn’t state it in the exact way you wanted me to, and therefore you are angry with me for noncompliance. Let's just say that communication is not your forte. Your only issue and anger with me is your…inability to control the exact wording I use when I answer a question. I don't want to control what you say, I just want to know what you mean by the meaningless word 'equality'. 'Equality of…
/r/MensRights22/07/22 08:31 PM
1

That is a lot of history that goes back to the 1920s…. Stepping out on a limb here, but I think history goes back a few more years than that. Then in the 70s there was a fear that women would quit being stay at home wives and traditional roles would break down. They have, now women want free day care because they care about their careers and kids get in the way. The marriage rate is way down and the birth rate is the lowest on record and way below replacement. Women and men were scared of being …
/r/MensRights22/07/22 08:27 PM
1

How can you make a presumption on the ERA that was never ratified. The 1964 Civil Rights Act is law. And everything done in it's name is prohibited by the 1964 CRA. Again, I can see that you don't understand, so I'll stop wasting my time on this issue, you can have the final word.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 08:16 PM
1

Im not going to sit here and expect my partner to treat me that way when so far, shes done everything to indicate the opposite. Best of luck. One of my wife's female relatives fell in with a feminist social worker and divorce ensued. Things can change.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 08:14 PM
2

chocolate have biggest tax in my country Now that's an anti-female tax for sure. :-)
/r/MensRights22/07/22 08:12 PM
1

Then my stance is meaningless euphemism. It's meaningless because you won't give it meaning by telling me specifically what you support. Do you support Affirmative Action?
/r/MensRights22/07/22 08:10 PM
1

I see. You don't do questions and you don't know what you advocate for or against.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 07:53 PM
2

The difference is that when men do it, it's against the law. Women do it, it's with the help of the law.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 07:52 PM
1

And you have said nothing about equal pay for equal work.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 07:50 PM
1

The ERA would have prohibited companies from paying you less now, because they would have had to pay women the same when they entered the workforce. Supposedly, and supposedly the 1964 Civil Rights Act prohibited sexist or racist discrimination against anyone. But a few short years later it became the enabling legislation for direct sexist and racist quotas and for Affirmative Action, things explicitly prohibited by the Act. You don't seem to understand for some reason.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 07:11 PM
1

Are you advocating for women to not be allowed in the workplace? You have lost the thread. Do you se how that has harmed you as a man as well? How what has harmed me? Can you address the simple direct question I asked?
/r/MensRights22/07/22 07:08 PM
1

I am a person who values equality between the sexes As I keep telling you, this means absolutely nothing. Do you support Affirmative Action? I’m interested in all the mechanisms that keep equality So you think there are too many men in STEM and you want to replace them with women, gotcha.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 07:06 PM
1

I said I lurk in all groups and support gender equality I don't know what you support. I do know what feminism supports and calls 'gender equality'... Feminism means equal representation anywhere where there are not more women and that women in the aggregate have to earn as much as men in the aggregate. Also women need to get all the good jobs and men all the financial responsibility. And free daycare for mothers and a ton of other stuff for women only. If the definition of feminism is equality …
/r/MensRights22/07/22 07:04 PM
1

No, equal is equal to the extent allowed by biological differences and economic advantages acquired by a person’s skill. Wrong, equal pay means you take home the same paycheck, period. It say's nothing about equal work. And feminism had an answer for that during the ERA time frame, they called it Comparable Worth. It's the notion that by placing arbitrary value on women's labor, it should be paid the same as men doing different jobs. Feminism is opposed to the concept of equal pay for equal work…
/r/MensRights22/07/22 03:45 PM
1

That’s what I do. I attack people and actions I find disturbing and not entire genders. That's apparently so you don't have to address the issues caused by or exacerbated by the feminist movement. If the ERA voting was correctly done, why have 3 stated rescinded their ratification? And the states that ratified the ERA after the deadline apparently did so without a public vote of approval, the governor or whomever just decided to ratify it.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 03:41 PM
1

Do you se how that has harmed you as a man as well? How what has harmed me?
/r/MensRights22/07/22 03:38 PM
2

I advocate for the ERA to be ratified. The ratification date has already passed. The ERA would mean women could get conscripted, access reproductive healthcare, provide equal rights to parents in custody agreements, etc. No, it would not. Like the 1964 Civil Rights Act was turned into Affirmative Action and diversity programs, things that the text of the act specifically prohibits, the ERA would be turned into more direct sexism against men.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 03:29 PM
1

But you still support the feminist movement which was the direct cause of many of men's issues and works to keep any traditional roles for men alive.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 03:27 PM
1

Phyllis wasn’t really anti- ERA. She was pro-power. She tried going up the ranks through the traditional outlets but they cut off her head after the ERA wasn’t ratified and denied her a cabinet position or any position. She had to go back to being a housewife. Lovely, attack the person and ignore the issue. How typical. But it's basic supply and demand, double the supply of labor and you reduce the value of labor, it was a vast number of women entering the workplace that caused this.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 03:25 PM
1

My belief is that all genders should have equal rights and opportunities. All genders. I see, equal responsibilities is not a thing with you. And no doubt you don't measure opportunities at all, you assume that lacking equal representation that there is a problem that needs to be fixed by direct racism and sexism.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 03:12 PM
4

You can look through my post history and see I am consistent in my beliefs. I am pro- equality. I'm just going by what I've seen you post here and in Askfeminists. And what do you mean by 'equality'? Feminism means equal representation anywhere where there are not more women and that women in the aggregate have to earn as much as men in the aggregate. Also women need to get all the good jobs and men all the financial responsibility. And free daycare for mothers and a ton of other stuff for women…
/r/MensRights22/07/22 02:55 PM
1

You know why i love my wife? Because when push comes to shove, she will put our family first. In divorce men usually find out that they are not part of the family. Some men never see their kids again.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 01:54 PM
3

Yea it's manipulative. Sadly, it just gave men more power. But not in a good way. It didn't just incentivized selfish greedy men, it turned it into a requirement. Say what?
/r/MensRights22/07/22 01:52 PM
3

Originally they are formed to combat discrimination. No, feminism was man-hating from the very beginning.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 01:50 PM
7

Lorena Bobbit is a feminist hero. And rather than seeing what she did as a criminal act of sexual mutilation, feminists say it as a viable political act of protest.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 01:50 PM
4

I still believe in the definition of feminism, but the way I practice my values has blossomed by the knowledge I’ve received from these mens’ spaces. I've seen you posting in Askfeminists. And generally you seem to be supporting the feminist position. And when you post here you are usually arguing against MRAs and I don't recall you taking a positive stance about any men's issues. So I'm curious what positive value you think you bring to the MRA sub? It was difficult as a young girl to look at h…
/r/MensRights22/07/22 01:43 PM
4

strength wise when biologically on average, men are stronger up top Actually men have more upper body and lower body strength. https://scholar.princeton.edu/sites/default/files/brzycki/files/mb-2002-01.pdf GENDER DIFFERENCES IN STRENGTH: A COMPARISON OF MALE AND FEMALE WORLD-RECORD PERFORMANCES IN POWERLIFTING INTRODUCTION The comparison of strength performances between men and women has been under investigation for more than a century. In terms of absolute strength – that is, without regard for…
/r/MensRights22/07/22 01:14 PM
51

And apparently they think sleeping men can also give consent.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 12:57 PM
0

or do you care about who I am as a person Was this discussion about you? But I'm not going to participate in something that has no goal to be positive. How does that go? Don't ever become a pessimist... a pessimist is correct oftener than an optimist, but an optimist has more fun, and neither can stop the march of events. Robert A. Heinlein
/r/MensRights22/07/22 12:43 PM
15

Perhaps its your personality, Odd then that so many men have posted their experiences here. Tf you mean its not a good decade lol who says shit like that. Pay attention, I did. It's my observation.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 03:35 AM
1

Psychology isn't a cure. It's just a method of helping you try to cope with life. Theoretically. And theoretically feminism is about equality between men and women (whatever the hell that means). Nothing is guaranteed, and some therapists don't have the best methods. The APA guidelines for treating men and boys are not a method for helping anyone, and it's also feminism in action. And to say "If they knew what they were doing, then they could cure everyone" really... Assumes how much control a t…
/r/MensRights22/07/22 03:31 AM
2

I read their editorial as well. But they have yet to change anything, the toxic APA guidelines for treating men and boys is still up and unchanged. They have not walked back one single damn thing.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 12:51 AM
3

It's his job to ask that question, and guide you to better understanding exactly how you feel. He already knows how he feels. And the question implies falsely that how you feel is decided logically, it is not and logic is irrelevant. It's a worthless question that will do nothing to address the issue.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 12:49 AM
1

No man, that person did not have control over the situation and did not intend for that result. How did you ascertain the unknown therapist's intent?
/r/MensRights22/07/22 12:43 AM
1

Agree with this. Him asking why something makes you feel a certain way also helps him understand exactly why you are upset. I doubt it, you can't really analyze the right brain through the left. You may not even know why you feel a certain way. And this may work better with women, idk, but women are more in touch with their feelings than men due to female brain development, they have a larger corpus callosum connecting both halves of the brain. If psychology knew what they were doing then they c…
/r/MensRights22/07/22 12:41 AM
2

but I don't recall them walking back anything meaningful. FTFY.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 12:29 AM
1

The APA has since retracted their statements Not that I've heard. The APA guidelines are still there unchanged. https://www.apa.org/about/policy/boys-men-practice-guidelines.pdf APA GUIDELINES for Psychological Practice with Boys and Men They did make a claim that they've changed, but they have not changed anything. Personally I don't believe them.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 12:28 AM
10

Just don't use Gillette products.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 12:10 AM
5

I came across a website years ago (which I am not going to try to find) that showed the import tax rates for different items. In many cases the import tax rate is different for men's and women's products. So even if they were to cost exactly the same to make and were sold at the same markup, after the import tax one item would be more expensive than the other. As I recall in some cases men's products had a higher tax and in some cases women's items had a higher tax.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 12:09 AM
11

Dating is the same. There are risks involved with but you can mitigate by making smart decisions and not thinking with your dick. There is absolutely no need for a man to do anything wrong.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 12:03 AM
51

There are plenty of women out there that are not feminists. There are also plenty of women out there who hate men who are not feminists. It's really not a good decade to be dating, or working with women, or looking for a job and lots of other things.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 12:01 AM
0

This implies that men’s rights and women’s rights are mutually exclusionary. But we don't fight for women's rights, we fight for equal rights. You have a very odd reading of equal rights. And You are the only one who has claimed that men's rights and women's rights are mutually exclusive. This is going nowhere and rather than address the issues you attack the person (look that up to, it's under 'ad hominem'. So you can have the final rant.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 11:42 PM
2

So you were imprisoned for ten years for something you did not do, can you tell me why this bothers you? So your wife assaulted you and then the police arrested you and want to put you on trial for DV, can you tell me why this bothers you? I'm not sure that particular question makes sense in all situations, some things would bother anybody.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 11:35 PM
3

No, I mean one of the first things women or feminists call you is 'incel'. It's the old 'can't get laid' attack with a fresh coat of paint.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 03:54 PM
11

Oh, btw, you're a Nazi, fascist, xyzphobe for posting this /s You forgot incel. Just saying.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 01:13 AM
5

Why? The post says that the therapists is a man. Possible confounding factors, in some languages there are no words for he and she (ex: Tagalog) and native speakers get the pronouns mixed up often. But without knowing more, it's best to read it as it is written.
/r/MensRights20/07/22 11:31 PM
27

His job is to get YOU to acknowledge reality. You mean the reality that men cannot be discriminated against? Someone here needs a reality check.
/r/MensRights20/07/22 11:29 PM
12

Counsellor here. What I suspect he was doing there was bringing the focus onto you, Is that not what the OP had done in bringing up the issue? It sounds more like he was dismissing his patients concerns. Perhaps the OP should find a different therapist.
/r/MensRights20/07/22 11:28 PM
1

The ERA will have the same effect as the 1964 Civil Rights Act, it will extend the scope in which the government can require sexism and racism. And you have not told me what you mean by the word 'equality'.
/r/MensRights20/07/22 03:14 PM
1

I oppose the ERA. The 1964 Civil Rights Act was turned into Affirmative Action and Diversity programs, things the text of the act specifically prohibit. The ERA will just end up enabling more sexism against men. The precedent has been set. What is it you claim you'd be giving up?
/r/MensRights20/07/22 02:59 PM
1

Even if you believe women have it better, it is categorically untrue to say that you don’t share the exact same end goal: equality The word 'equality' by itself means nothing. Equality of what? Regardless, feminism is straight-up female advocacy and nothing more.
/r/MensRights20/07/22 02:42 PM
2

That might explain why a youtube search failed.
/r/MensRights20/07/22 01:00 PM
4

I would love to, can you post a link?
/r/MensRights20/07/22 02:38 AM
26

A lot of criticism of the men's rights movement comes in the from of the accusation that it complains a lot about feminism. Also, since you seem data deprived, it seems time for Karen Straughan's 'no true feminist' post which gives a laundry list of what feminist has been up to... So what you're saying is that you, a commenter using a username on an internet forum are the true feminist, and the feminists actually responsible for changing the laws, writing the academic theory, teaching the course…
/r/MensRights20/07/22 02:37 AM
16

I don't know if you're serious or not, but feminism is more interested in harming men than helping women. Feminism has even written laws requiring the police to arrest male DV victims of females. In 1996 or so feminists wrote the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) which among other things denies male DV victims recognition as DV victims and denies any resources to male DV victims. But that was not enough, some female abusers were still being arrested and feminism could not support that, so in the…
/r/MensRights20/07/22 02:33 AM
-1

Fighting for men’s rights doesn’t necessarily mean fighting against women’s rights. But we don't fight for women's rights, we fight for equal rights. What you have created is known as a false dichotomy, and a very feminist one at that. It's not women's rights or men's rights.
/r/MensRights18/07/22 11:37 PM
2

It's not so much a lack of empathy real as that is, in the past female leaders (queens) had no skin in the game. The king had to lead his army into battle and often died, queens were under no such obligation, they remained safe in the castle.
/r/MensRights18/07/22 03:43 PM
10

“Women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat.” --Hillary Rodham Clinton Hmmm, 1 day old account, -51 karma, looks like a troll account.
/r/MensRights18/07/22 01:40 PM
7

Tell that to the men sent off to war in the Falklands by Margaret Thatcher.
/r/MensRights18/07/22 01:38 PM
1

As we fight for women's rights, let's not forget this pesky little fact This is the men's rights sub, is it not?
/r/MensRights18/07/22 01:37 PM
1

All feminists say they are about equality, but if you ask specific questions you'll almost always find that their 'equality' supports everything feminism has said and done. And in the threads I'd seen, no one was asking specific questions to find what she supported. So we really don't know whether they were egalitarian, and it's just about impossible to fine one that is egalitarian. So I remain skeptical.
/r/MensRights18/07/22 01:24 PM
1

It was written by a feminist, and the title describes what it's about. So You Want to Be a Male Feminist? Maybe Don’t.
/r/MensRights18/07/22 01:19 PM
3

There are no feminists opposing the draft now.
/r/MensRights18/07/22 03:14 AM
7

But we don't agree. You: Feminists oppose the draft. Me: Feminists only oppose drafting women. It's not a subtle difference. When suffrage was an issue most women opposed women's suffrage. Why? They did not want to be subject to the military draft, being called up for fire brigades, posses to chase armed felons and all the life threatening duties that boys from 14 and up were subject to, and a great many died from. And nothing has changed today. They literally have never given one single fuck ab…
/r/MensRights18/07/22 01:45 AM
3

Where are the feminist protests today? There are none. Your premise is denied by the facts, feminism does not oppose the draft per se, they only oppose women being drafted. I don't see why you can't understand this.
/r/MensRights18/07/22 01:20 AM
9

Naa, they don't care. They talk about ending the draft only when the possibility of women being drafted comes up, and only for that reason. Otherwise it's <crickets>.
/r/MensRights18/07/22 12:57 AM
2

Tell me of these things that help 'only men'.
/r/MensRights18/07/22 12:23 AM
3

Some people do fight for true equality, but hide under the guise of feminism Show me these people.
/r/MensRights18/07/22 12:16 AM
9

Feminism is transparent. They will support anything that benefits women and oppose anything that may harm any woman, no matter how reprehensible that individual woman may be. They will also oppose anything that might help men.
/r/MensRights18/07/22 12:15 AM
5

"If you want to help us, don't help us". Funny, many feminists say the same thing... https://archive.ph/QNv9k So You Want to Be a Male Feminist? Maybe Don’t.
/r/MensRights18/07/22 12:13 AM
4

Yes haha she also laughed when ask about male suicide in other video but i dont have it at hand. So she thinks male suicide is funny?
/r/MensRights18/07/22 12:09 AM
4

Maybe, maybe not. She may have helped you up to kick you down again. It is not necessarily true that the enemy of your enemy is your friend.
/r/MensRights18/07/22 12:04 AM
2

There is also a larger minority for whom their misandry refuses to rise to the level of supporting any of the laws and policies of the feminist institutions and who are lost in the slight of hand of words like patriarchy and toxic masculinity, genuinely believing those terms help men. This is a rather confusing construction. But you seem to be referring that mythical 'good feminist' silent majority for which their is zero evidence of their existence. There is literally more evidence for Bigfoot …
/r/MensRights17/07/22 11:53 PM
2

you woman hating incels love being horrible to woman online. Wow, that did not take long. Found the feminist. It's like it makes you feel powerful treating woman harshly through a computer You don't know the sex of anyone on the internet sport. And where did you get your license to practice psychology? EDIT: Troll alert, 1 hour old account with negative karma.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 05:27 PM
2

At the very least they would not advertise the product in such an offensive manner. The ads would be very indirect. Obviously internet ads don't have the same constraints as broadcast TV ads. This probably makes it difficult to complain. But as some commenter said, it's a good idea to get an ad-blocker.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 05:24 PM
6

Abortion is a right in many other countries, and it should be here. Islam is the religion in many other countries, so I guess you think the US should be an Islamic nation too. forced birth is wrong on many levels. There is no such thing though. Birth the the natural result of pregnancy, abortion is the only point where force would be used. Men have much more power over their reproduction than women do. Tell me about this reproductive power you claim men have.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 03:27 PM
2

Wow, I have not seen this before... Do Manscaped shave their balls? Hair removal or minimization is a big step. Some accomplish it with an electric trimmer or a razor (or both). We here at MANSCAPED™ are experts (obviously) at shaving one's balls. But not just shaving your balls, but shaving them safely.Jun 15, 2021
/r/MensRights17/07/22 01:55 PM
1

Apparently masculinity is the problem. 2. And they don't have to just be about our looks. Just to be clear, the praise you give doesn't need to revolve around our bodies. In fact, it's important that women commend the things that masculinity tends to belittle, like if we're good cooks or have insightful takeaways about foreign films.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 01:10 PM
1

Shave?
/r/MensRights17/07/22 12:59 PM
3

I use an ad blocker. Me too, some ads will crypto mine with your CPU and some will install malware. Even on your phone. I've never seen that ad, and I don't want to.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 12:55 PM
1

If the commercial were reversed and it had a man telling a woman that her vagina smelled, then all the Feminists would be screaming and blasting the company on social media! Vaginal smell actually is a thing at some point in the menstrual cycle, just before the period I think. But I don't think women need any hygiene products here.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 12:49 PM
0

You can ignore what's happening in the real world if you want, nothing I can do about that. At any rate, have a good day.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 12:40 PM
1

Yeah but you’re not taking into account that falsely accusing someone of rape is not on par with actually forcibly raping someone. I can see that you don't care about the actual damage done. Things get predatory when people have sex with others who are clearly not in their right state of mind. Do you know why women historically went to bars to meet men? The alcohol helped loosen their inhibitions so they could do what they really wanted to do. But the fact remains that in many college cases both…
/r/MensRights17/07/22 12:26 PM
0

When the topic does come up, most feminists usually show support for men's reproductive rights. Show me. Women don't show interest in some fields because those fields are stereotypically male fields, Or maybe those fields are stereotypically male because few women are interested in them. The idea that women can't rape men is an extremely conservative mindset that most of them oppose. It's a feminist idea and feminism was involved in making sure the law did not recognize that men can be raped by …
/r/MensRights17/07/22 12:22 PM
1

Bad bot, that was not my text.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 12:14 PM
1

Making a false rape allegation is not the same as raping someone so I don’t think they should have equal penalties. The penalty should relate to the damage done. The accusation alone can destroy a man's career and future, and there's that potential prison sentence on top of that. You apparently don't think the real damages the man does face are a big problem. Typical. Rape and murder are two different crimes so they have two different penalties. They don't though, the penalties are pretty much t…
/r/MensRights17/07/22 12:13 PM
0

I'm glad you know my sister better than I do, and I appreciate you calling me a liar and insulting my family (calling her deceitful) because you want a scapegoat. And I appreciate your lying about what I posted. I'm done with this sub. In which sub are you going to call commenters liars next? I wanted to find a mature place to discuss the issues that plague men, and all I've seen is women hating and complaining. That's all feminists can see. FYI the feminist terminology for any man mentioning me…
/r/MensRights17/07/22 12:03 PM
2

but how about here, He or she found their own way. And immediately got called a pig for it. And I'm not sure they were really a feminist, they were just following the crowd. it was recently but it was always a little doubt in the back of my mind since my mind set at the time was everybody is a feminist so I should be one or here Wow, wall of text, but she found her own way too. Feminist Here: Maybe I Don't Agree with Feminism Anymore Apparently she did not like the way she was treated by women a…
/r/MensRights17/07/22 11:54 AM
1

False accusations shouldn’t carry the same penalty as the rape because they are not rape. What does that have to do with the penalty? If her lie would have put a man in prison for 10 years, you think she should only face 5? You have no idea how they might feel about the sec when they become sober. Dead sober women often have next day regrets and make false rape accusations, this happens a lot on college campuses. But you did not answer the question about a drunk man and a drunk woman having sex.…
/r/MensRights17/07/22 11:34 AM
9

Not really. Both articles were posted here. One man was killed at a park and the other in his home as I recall. Try doing a search on 'police killed' and there are so many results that I can't find them. Here's a father that was killed by the police for no reason, they say they were 'following protocols'. https://www.cnn.com/2014/02/26/justice/oklahoma-arrest-death-video/index.html?hpt=hp_t2 Oklahoma father dies in police encounter after mother slaps daughter
/r/MensRights17/07/22 11:26 AM
8

Feminists have helped with a variety of things. The first wave of feminism was very much focused on ensuring that women would have the right to vote, and a combination of their activism and free-thinking men allowed it to happen. Don't forget inventing domestic terrorism, bombing the hell out of London and inventing the IED and letter bomb. And also don't forget the man hating. From the first recognized feminist document, the Declaration of Sentiments signed in 1848 at Seneca Falls NY. https://w…
/r/MensRights17/07/22 12:41 AM
1

In my opinion, and my opinion only, a false rape accusation should result in a punishment that is half of what the punishment for the accused crime would be. Half? So much or equal treatment. When two drunk people have sex I think it is just that, sex. In my opinion, and my opinion only, it becomes rape when one person is significantly less intoxicated than the other. How do you determine this after the fact? A woman forcing a man to have sex should be rape, legally and morally. It's not. A few …
/r/MensRights17/07/22 12:29 AM
7

There’s no reason to believe that every feminist is some man hating Tell me of the feminist actions were not man-hating. Certainly it's not their position on DV. In 1996 or so feminists wrote the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) which among other things denies male DV victims recognition as DV victims and denies any resources to male DV victims. But that was not enough, some female abusers were still being arrested and feminism could not support that, so in the next VAWA re-authorization femini…
/r/MensRights17/07/22 12:23 AM
2

Seeing some of the feminists become former feminists by visiting this very board, I can say that some of them do believe in equality enough to leave the movement. I've challenged dozens at least in this very forum. No matter how much information about feminist was posted they did not respond and did not care and none stopped being a feminist. And that's just here, this is what I've seen since the 1990s and possibly earlier.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 12:21 AM
3

If I see Bob the MRA say women suck. It means Bob thinks women suck. Is "women" a plural or a universal? Don't you have to add an 'all' to get a universal? In fact, saying something about any individual woman can lead to claims that you hate all women, it's such a fast jump to lightspeed that it would have changed Star Wars forever.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 12:17 AM
6

Seems like you're mad at anyone that won't lump all feminists into one category. All feminists put themselves in the same category (feminists) by calling themselves feminist. It's an ideological position and they can change it at any time and twice on Thursdays.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 12:13 AM
0

False accusations happen, that’s why I don’t support the death penalty for rape. I think the punishment should match the crime. So if you consider it a crime (the police don't) what would you suggest as the penalty for making a false rape accusation? Rape lies on a spectrum. Is this an LGBT thing? On the less extreme end you have situations where someone gets taken advantage of while intoxicated So a dunk man and a drunk woman have sex, is the man a rapist? What about the woman? She had sex with…
/r/MensRights17/07/22 12:04 AM
2

I agree that not everything is rape. Every day more normal things are becoming rape. However even when my experiences of rape and sexual assault were quite clearly rape and sexual assault I was still met with people suggesting it was a misunderstanding. The police don't care, they'll do everything possible to destroy the life of any man accused and have no issues at all putting innocent men in prison. In the UK the head of the CPS, a woman by the name of Alison Saunders promised to bring the rap…
/r/MensRights16/07/22 11:55 PM
4

Everyone cheers when a rapist and abuser is injured. You mean accused rapist or abuser. But then, men murdered in their sleep just never come to court to clear their name, so they must be guilty, right? But you seem to be an advocate of violence, I would not be shocked if you were not an advocate of rape as well.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 11:32 PM
1

Rape culture doesn’t mean rape is legal or praised or anything like that, that’s not it at all. https://www.marshall.edu/wcenter/sexual-assault/rape-culture/ What is the “Rape Culture?” Rape Culture is an environment in which rape is prevalent and in which sexual violence against women is normalized and excused in the media and popular culture. Rape culture is perpetuated through the use of misogynistic language, the objectification of women’s bodies, and the glamorization of sexual violence, th…
/r/MensRights16/07/22 11:28 PM
3

Only more recently do feminist believe supporting male victims but it’s only cause of Johnny depp. They have never supported male victims and they do not do so now. Feminism wants male DV victims arrested. In 1996 or so feminists wrote the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) which among other things denies male DV victims recognition as DV victims and denies any resources to male DV victims. But that was not enough, some female abusers were still being arrested and feminism could not support that,…
/r/MensRights16/07/22 11:14 PM
2

Feminiat boards don't support torturing and murdering men. Feminists 100% support any women who injures, kills or especially sexually mutilates a man. Lorena Bobbit is a feminist heroine.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 11:09 PM
5

Here's some quotes from feminists in the 70s-90s. I feel that ‘man-hating’ is an honorable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them. Robin Morgan, Ms. Magazine Editor The nuclear family must be destroyed… Whatever its ultimate meaning, the break-up of families now is an objectively revolutionary process. Linda Gordon I want to see a man beaten to a bloody pulp with a high-heel shoved in his mouth, like an apple in the mou…
/r/MensRights16/07/22 11:04 PM
1

The history thing is an interesting point though, as we are finding things were not as one sided as many people made them out to be. You can't project anti-male stereotypes into the past and get history. Who knew? If someone could let the feminists know that would be great.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 10:58 PM
2

the same bag as someone who wants good treatment and rights for themselves in a job. If you're a man asking for that you will be called a misogynist, an incel and possibly a rape apologist. Any man who gets a job takes a job away from a woman apparently.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 10:57 PM
2

You asked why people would not want to serve on a jury and I tried to explain it to you.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 10:54 PM
1

I doubt it, if they're feminist trained then they lack the concept of an innocent man. Tradcon men are no better. I doubt liberal male judges would be better either as they as as dedicated to protecting the women as tradcon men.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 10:52 PM
2

Rape culture is alive and well. So you claim that rape is legal, accepted and rewarded. What color is the sun on your planet. At ant rate, everything is rape today and false rape accusations are a thing. While it is certainly improving the “blame the victim” mentality is still around. 100% if the victim is a man. Rape culture targets women and men. Have you ever been outside? Men especially bad. Legally women cannot commit the act of rape even if they do the same thing to a man that would be con…
/r/MensRights16/07/22 10:50 PM
2

A woman can destroy her male enemy with simply pointing her finger at him. She cries "rape" and he goes to jail, pays her a millionaire sum. That is some kind of very high priviledge. She did not earn it though, so has it simple and only because she is female. We could spend all day talking about it. We know how it is. Indeed, have a good day then.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 08:49 PM
7

Everything in the list above is a serious feminist issue, nothing was made up. If you think they are trivial or sexist, well there you go.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 08:31 PM
6

Is minimizing societal issues faced by women helpful to mens rights in anyway? What are women's issues today? Let's see... Manspreading Mansplaining Too many men in congress Too many male CEOs Too many white men (need for diversity above Civil Rights) Too many men gainfully employed in STEM fields. That we live in a rape culture. That we live in a Patriarchy. Did I miss anything?
/r/MensRights16/07/22 08:25 PM
75

It's not a competition and regressing the rights of one sex doesn't help the opposite sex. In the US abortion is not now and never was a right. And repealing roe vs wade did not make abortion illegal, it became a state's rights issue like it was before roe vs wade and like it always has been Constitutionally. Men have no reproductive rights at all, so men have nothing to lose, but things can always get worse. Fair people need to learn to look out for eachother. And improve all of this. Women don…
/r/MensRights16/07/22 08:18 PM
5

well-meaning feminists Good luck finding one.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 08:10 PM
2

We are talking about a movement which is based on earning priviledge for their own gender, but claim that they are fighting for equality. You don't earn privilege. And feminism only wants the same result as men, women don't have to work as hard or as long, they only have to get the same results as men regardless.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 08:07 PM
1

Most of the bad things that happen to men happen because of women. Women make false accusations of SA and DV, often to get custody of the kids, and often to get revenge for a real or imagined slight, often for breaking up with her, for refusing to have sex with her (women don't generally know how to take 'no' for an answer and don't seem to care if it would ruin a married man's wife). Feminism may be one of the reasons why a woman's accusation is so powerful, but it's still women who make them f…
/r/MensRights16/07/22 08:05 PM
2

Haha nah, I’ve known her for 30 years, we literally tell each other everything. I doubt it. If you ask a general question you'll get the expected answer. Ask a feminist: Do you believe that discrimination in the workplace is wrong? All will answer: Of course. Then ask them a specific question... Ask a feminist: Do you support Affirmative Action and diversity? All will answer: Of course. Ask them why they are supporting sexism and racism in the workplace and you'll get a lot of feminist reasons w…
/r/MensRights16/07/22 07:56 PM
2

The average person who identifies as a feminist is reasonable, Source?
/r/MensRights16/07/22 07:48 PM
2

We know that there are feminists who believe in genuine equality (or at least a feminist version of it). The feminist version of 'genuine equality'?? Really?
/r/MensRights16/07/22 06:29 PM
0

Not a problem. I admit that some female judges are fair and impartial, but I expect fewer than male judges as many female judges have feminist training and beliefs and don't understand the concept of an innocent man.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 12:08 AM
2

I don't know why so many people don't want to do jury duty. Many people have lives to live and don't get paid if they don't work. It's not that hard to figure out. I know it can be long and boring, but the fact that so many intelligent and logical people try to wiggle out of it is terrible. Once you get called up they keep calling you up for years and years. The time before last I had to care for my wife after an operation. Their procedure sucks, if they approve letting you not serve that time t…
/r/MensRights15/07/22 11:23 PM
3

She's an attorney and not a judge. Camille Vasquez is an American attorney known for representing actor Johnny Depp in the defamation case that he brought against his ex-wife Amber
/r/MensRights15/07/22 11:15 PM
0

Let me repeat the claim. The best judges of women, are other women. Notice it says women and not woman.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 11:13 PM
3

Telling the prosecutor that you know about it is one easy way to get off jury duty.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 04:02 PM
2

The head of the CPS directed the police to hide exculpatory evidence in order to bring the rape conviction rate up. The UK is happy to imprison innocent men to get a better conviction rate. The UK judges bible (forget the exact name) tells judges that they don't have to give men and women the same sentences for the same crime. Another directive tells judges to not give women custodial sentences unless absolutely necessary. So if a woman bottles a man in a bar because he's not paying attention to…
/r/MensRights15/07/22 03:58 PM
4

Old people are even more sexist than young people and women are harder on women than men. Where do you get this? And women have an in-group bias, they will support female abusers, murderers and child killers and blame their male victims or husbands.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 03:47 PM
9

Absolutely. I'd complain to the prosecutors supervisor, and threaten going to the media too. The media is worse than the prosecutor.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 03:46 PM
4

Make a separate claim against the judge. The prosecutor brought the case to court, not the judge.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 03:44 PM
6

In other words, the defence attorney (she/her) was illegally working against her own client because any man accused of domestic violence is guilty. Wait, the man was on trial, so his attorney was the defense.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 03:42 PM
6

The best judges of women, are other women. Source?
/r/MensRights15/07/22 03:40 PM
1

a good amount of feminist believe in mens rights Odd then that no such feminists have ever been spotted in the wild. They form no groups, they don't wrote about or talk about men's issues anywhere that can be seen. They don't object to the most obscene feminist misandry in any forums, ever. There is far more evidence for the existence of bigfoot than feminists who advocate for men and men's rights.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 03:24 PM
6

This outburst was really just a function of the rage felt by all good people (women in particular) in the UK after the committing of this terrible crime. 'Men' have committed no crime. A man or women can commit a crime, (although the UK has decided not to imprison women as a matter of policy), although at this point in history apparently we don't know what a woman is. The blame (if any) belongs to the individual who committed the crime, not to any group they may be a member of.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 02:45 PM
4

Well, it was good till the end. But the national domestic violence hotline (if this is in the US) won't help men. It's funded by the VAWA. I've read a post in some article's comments by a women who said she called the hotline and was laughed off the line, she says she has a very masculine voice and they would not listen to her or believe her.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 02:37 PM
1

whenever I get a notification for this sub (which means it’s trending and getting lots of updoots) No, you get a notification when anyone responds to your post or comment. You can select whether you want notification when you make a post, but as far as I know you can't turn off notifications for replies to comments.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 01:46 PM
1

I’m curious why do you think that because I advocate for equal right of women Your wording shows that you are not advocating for equal rights. If you advocated for equal rights, it would not be 'for women', it would be 'for everybody'. destroying the gender roles set on women and I try to uplift and empower as many women I can What you have is just straight-up woman's advocacy.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 01:42 PM
2

What I’m saying is your statement implies women don’t suffer gender based violence that was indirectly caused by trad gender roles which would just be plain wrong I see, so you're arguing the Duluth Model. Duluth is predicated on the "patriarchal terrorism" paradigm of partner violence. That is, men beat their female partners in order to assert masculine dominance within their relationships. Their motives are to conform to patriarchal norms and to reify a the patriarchal social/political/cultura…
/r/MensRights15/07/22 01:16 PM
2

She's already petitioned the judge to cancel the award, the judge said "no".
/r/MensRights15/07/22 02:25 AM
2

He was awarded the money, but it looks like Amber does not have the money to pay the award.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 01:53 AM
0

Don't you mean Ms worded? You are a feminist, right?
/r/MensRights15/07/22 12:20 AM
3

I agree that’s on of the very gender stereotypes I fight against and that heavily effect both women and men Yeah, women can beat the hell out of their husbands and face no repercussions. They can rape a man and it's not legally rape. There are very few actual crimes they can commit for which they will be punished. And they will usually receive a slap on the wrist or a probationary sentence. How women must suffer.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 12:19 AM
3

since most of the feminist I work/interact with care about mens rights Yeah right. Show us.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 12:17 AM
6

I haven’t heard of many bad experiences For some reason permabanned redditors rarely post about it in the sub they were banned from. Why? I dunno, it's a mystery to me.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 12:16 AM
2

Having posted here you may be automatically banned from many subs, not just feminist subs. Check the sidebar... WARNING: Some other subs have bots that will ban you if you post or comment here.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 12:14 AM
2

Feminism has nothing but stereotypes about men. You have them too... And the teach your boys not to rape is in response to people telling women to teach their daughters to dress appropriately so they don’t get raped which puts blame on the victim and not the actual perpetrators
/r/MensRights15/07/22 12:12 AM
1

I agree my statement was miss worded but why u hostile towards feminism Did you know that you can edit your post? If you do please mark the edits. The only thing you can't edit is the subject line.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 12:11 AM
3

And the teach your boys not to rape is in response to people telling women to teach their daughters to dress appropriately so they don’t get raped which puts blame on the victim and not the actual perpetrators So then you are a feminist, which means that you are anti-male.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 12:10 AM
3

I miss worded the statement I mainly mean hostility trowards feminism Because feminism is and always has been openly hostile to men. For example, in 1996 or so feminists wrote the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) which among other things denies male DV victims recognition as DV victims and denies any resources to male DV victims (which is still true today). But that was not enough, some female abusers were still being arrested and feminism could not support that, so in the next VAWA re-authoriz…
/r/MensRights15/07/22 12:08 AM
1

This is the sub she was interested in taking part in Odd then that she's responded to none of the comments. This is probably a troll post. EDIT: I had to scroll down a bit, but I see she has responded to a few comments.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 12:03 AM
2

For example, hating on left handed people Hey man, left handed people are just fighting for their, err, rights. /s
/r/MensRights14/07/22 11:58 PM
1

DETAILS OF THE BILL Provides flexibility for mothers who do not want involvement of the father by not requiring those mothers to receive child support Requires judges to consult with mothers on payment plans and gives mothers discretion as to whether or not child support payments will be awarded retroactively Mandates that all paternity tests be at the discretion of the mother and not be conducted if the test would put the child at risk
/r/MensRights14/07/22 03:48 PM
4

There is no guarantee that she will give birth, even if abortion is off the table. The law makes no requirement that the man charged actually be the father (I doubt this would bother most women). The law makes it the woman's choice whether the purported father can ever see or parent the child, so it assigns the purported father all costs and gives the mother all the benefits (which you seem fine with). So why not start sooner so she can actually buy the necessary items before birth? There's noth…
/r/MensRights14/07/22 03:30 PM
2

Perhaps, but the meanings 1.5 thousand years ago or so are rarely known so these things are normally read literally. I am not responsible for the doings of anyone else, nor can I take credit for the good someone else does. But under coverture, a husband was in fact responsible for crimes committed by his wife, theoretically only non-capital crimes but I have my doubts.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 03:25 PM
7

Unix Fortune: 78.3511% of all statistics are made up on the spot.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 02:30 PM
5

Men literally have no rights as a parent. Even when married, it's just that when married men normally have daily access to the children.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 02:29 PM
16

Men are held responsible in many ways. We expect them, these days, to spend their free time with their wife's children even if they are not his children FTFY. If divorce comes they pay the vast majority of child support and alimony. And many men never see their children again. Which shows that in reality, men are those who pay, not those who parent.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 02:26 PM
6

but when guys are acting like shit bags it makes us all look like shit. No, it does not. I realize that women and feminist's think there's only 'men' rather than a group of individuals. They also blame all men for the claimed actions of any man. Kinda like you do. So if you’re forced to be around them, should we call out the behavior? Do as you wish. But getting in other people's business can have repercussions. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/vypm4e/man_hospitalized_after_trying_to…
/r/MensRights14/07/22 02:23 PM
22

If anything this trial showed how bad she was an an actress. Johnny Depp may never get the money awarded, but it looks like he got his career back. And the trial made the point that men can be DV victims of women in a very public fashion, so this trial was good news all around.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 02:01 PM
36

"Men of the world, can't you be better than this Red Green "Men's Prayer": I'm a man, but I can change, If I have to, I guess. and accept that your seed demands nurturing for the remainder of your ultimately inconsequential lives? Understand that by raising your child you are fulfilling your largest contribution toward the future of humanity." And here I was given to understand that biology should not be destiny. I guess that applies only to women.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 01:58 PM
10

Do y’all hold other men accountable? Accountable for what? In what way? As the bible says, 'I am not my brother's keeper'. Do women hold other women accountable? There seems no crime a woman can commit that other women will hold her to blame for. She can kill her kids or her husband and receive nothing but support and sympathy from women.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 01:50 PM
2

You’re either knowing or not knowingly overwhelming the conversation with too many random thoughts. Since I responded directly to your words, they were your random thoughts. I mean that’s fine if you need to vent or whatever, but seriously, that’s not a good way to have a conversation about a complicated topic It has never been possible to have a discussion with feminists about men's issues, it's not just that they don't care, they actively want to harm men, and laws they have written like the V…
/r/MensRights14/07/22 03:07 AM
27

La. congressman proposes bill that would allow pregnant mothers to get child support payments So if a fetus is legally a child then abortion is the murder of a child.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 03:01 AM
1

I'm not a US citizen so I don't understand what you're talking about. You support breaking a law that says it's illegal to discriminate on the basis of race or sex and a few other thing. So you support racism and sexism. Feminism demands racism and sexism for women and against men, it's what they do. And google is your friend. Look, this is a pointless waste of time and it's not going anywhere. You can have the final word, I'm done.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 02:59 AM
2

https://archive.ph/J8CD4 The Feminist Fatales: Far from peaceful protesters... how Britain's Suffragettes turned to 'TERRORISM' to win vote by blowing up trains and torching tearooms - amid claims their tactics DELAYED women's rights Simon Webb counters popular view in his book The Suffragette Bombers: Britain's Forgotten Terrorists He claims 'history has been kind' to Emmeline Pankhurst and the other leaders of the movement He argues that they carried out a 'widespread and sustained bombing cam…
/r/MensRights14/07/22 02:55 AM
2

I support domestic terrorism action Fixed that for you. it got results Not so, it delayed the vote for women and the common man. and was for a good cause. Domestic terrorism for a good cause? Remind me to never be wherever you're advocating for a 'good cause'. Free clue, which you won't understand. You can't do good by means that are evil
/r/MensRights14/07/22 02:26 AM
1

So then you oppose Civil and Constitutional rights? No If you support Affirmative Action, diversity programs of any sort, then you oppose Civil and Constitutional rights. And since you support racism and sexism as right, proper, and necessary, what is it you're protesting again?
/r/MensRights14/07/22 02:23 AM
2

Died after throwing herself in front of King George the 5th horse at a racing derby in 1913 on live television. She was not killed, she tried to pin something on the Kings horse in the middle of a race and things did not go well for her. In effect she accidentally killed herself. https://archive.ph/mQm42 Suffragette Emily Davison DIDN'T want to kill herself at the Epsom Derby: Relative speaks out about what REALLY happened as she appears on Celebrity Big Brother to tell all Suffragette Emily Dav…
/r/MensRights14/07/22 02:09 AM
1

"Yes, but only by violating the Civil Rights laws that they had demanded." <- They did something big, they did what they had to and they got results So then you oppose Civil and Constitutional rights?
/r/MensRights14/07/22 01:12 AM
2

Nice comment too.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 01:09 AM
2

The desire for murder is rare among humans, The hashtag #killallmen disagrees with you. Until there is equal gender representation in all areas of the world Who says that things should be like that. And there is never a sunset clause on the anti-male sexism feminism creates and supports. That alone proves that their 'representation' claims are whole cloth lies. No one wants to kill us for our gender. Valerie Solanis and Andy Worhall would like a word with you. Men who were born with male anatomy…
/r/MensRights14/07/22 01:01 AM
3

Just pick up the child one last time, explain the situation then leave He'll probably be arrested if he returns. He deserves to know I'm sure his mom will tell him.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 12:06 AM
2

Every movement has it's martyrs. Tell me of these feminist martyrs.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 12:04 AM
1

Right now you're blaming men for not protesting. Men have protested a lot over the years and many have ended up dead, injured or in jail. The social norm is to protect women and children, feminism leveraged that traditional norm, it works against men and men's efforts. That's why MRAs are considered jokes. Karen Straughan in a post that I cannot find summed it up nicely that in just be asking for help men lose any right to it. No matter what men do or do not do, they are wrong. If a man's girlfr…
/r/MensRights13/07/22 04:03 PM
2

but black people as a whole managed to get white people to take them seriously, including black men. Yes, but only by violating the Civil Rights laws that they had demanded. And once the rule of law is abandoned direct racism and sexism became the norm, every diversity program shows that. You apparently think this is a good thing, we will have to disagree. And what about gay people? I dunno, they seem to have the exact same complaints today as before, every post that hits the front page is about…
/r/MensRights13/07/22 03:59 PM
2

“Apparently”….also, this news is from a long time ago and about a small group of outliers. Outliers? How? The political group they started is not based on “kill men”, that’s just something a few of them said Well, that is feminist equality, even without the hashtag. I keep seeing news from Sweden. For example, the Swedish colleges gave advantages to 'underrepresented' groups, primarily women. When women became the majority and men started asking for the advantages they were due, the program was …
/r/MensRights13/07/22 03:54 PM
2

We obviously value soldiers because we pay them. Male and female soldiers. Do we pay mothers to raise children? Normally the father pays for the mother to raise the child. But let's look at public expenditures... For welfare, for which mostly only women or women with children are eligible... https://www.urban.org/policy-centers/cross-center-initiatives/state-and-local-finance-initiative/state-and-local-backgrounders/public-welfare-expenditures How much do state and local governments spend on pub…
/r/MensRights13/07/22 03:07 PM
2

I did not watch all the video, but there were halls of women singing about killing men and apparently the political group they started is the largest in Sweden and state supported. The claim was that they had shelters in about half the cities in Sweden. So I question your count.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 02:57 PM
1

There are a scene in this documentary: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Gender_War where feminists at a rally chants "döda alla menn" = kill all men. Yes, apparently when men are violent, that's a problem, but violent murdering women, that's the solution. They are not protesting against violence, they are advocating for female violence.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 02:54 PM
2

Username checks out.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 02:47 PM
1

Thanks, sis! We same feminists need to start being a little louder I think. Misandrist ideals have no place in respectable feminism. Misandrist ideals are respectable feminism. And there is no feminist opposition.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 02:30 PM
1

Intersectionalism is not about avoiding ridicule. Quite the opposite. It's about bridging everyone's experiences where they overlap. Intersectionality is about ranking oppression. A woman will always rank as more oppressed than a man. A POC will always rank as more oppressed than a white person. A gay/LGBT person will always rank as more oppressed than a straight person. A straight while male is naturally the oppressive force in society by this ranking and as a result intersectionality denies me…
/r/MensRights13/07/22 02:17 PM
1

Many women support men's interests & issues Most women laugh at men's issues and call any man who raises such issues whiners and incels and neckbeards and a host of other names. Ad hominem never addresses any issues often it prevents the issues from being discussed with others. but feel that openly advocating for them would be undermining and somehow hinder making progress on women's issues. So there's actually no support at all. Zip, zero, nada.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 02:06 PM
2

Black men are still men, it's worked somewhat for black women, but they still benefit from society being protective of women.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 01:19 PM
2

Do you forget the child in the equation? The child has a mother. He is also a victim that has been punished for life. The child is also a victim of the mother's deceit and infidelity. And let's face it, society will kick the father out of the child's life at any time at the mother's behest be it by divorce or any number of false accusations. It seems likely that this was going to happen now that the husband knows he's not the father. The mother will most likely kick him out. I know that the man …
/r/MensRights13/07/22 01:15 PM
2

Wow, you seem to have hit most of the feminist stereotypes dead on. You only forgot the part where I live in my mom's basement or garage and the neckbeard part. What's my favorite colour? and write paragraphs the size of War and Peace Since I don't, why do you claim I do.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 01:12 PM
1

I watched part of the first, it's about claims of the ritual satanic sacrifice of children by influential persons (probably swedes). The first video is 1 hour, not sure about the second. Took a quick look at the second video, it's also 1 hour, but seems more relevant.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 02:41 AM
1

Girlfriend tells me she hates men; it hurts me, but what am I supposed to do? Get a better girlfriend.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 02:29 AM
29

So what if a man asked a woman the same question on a date? For some reason women expect their date to be 6" tall, but if he asks how much she weighs that's a big problem.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 02:24 AM
2

Did some googling and maybe it's so... https://www.news.com.au/yes-its-true-australia-is-experiencing-a-man-drought/news-story/6b4f141beb5583eb7156891ad2a97772 Yes, it’s true: Australia is experiencing a man drought IT’S not all in your head — Australia is experiencing a man drought, and these are the areas which are worst affected. So where should you go if you want to find a beau? “The man drought is a demographic reality,” says Mark McCrindle, a social researcher and demographer who analysed …
/r/MensRights13/07/22 02:21 AM
9

Okay, it is totally wrong and the guy should rot in hell. So do you actually know what, if anything happened? But why the entire gender is involved in this issue? Apparently all men are guilty for the claimed crime of any man. Somehow with women it's different.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 01:35 AM
3

I'm curious as to why you think denying women the right to vote is not oppressive? Men paid for the right to vote with millions of deaths, by being draftable for military service, and for bucket brigades and for posses chasing armed criminals and many dangerous tasks when they were considered men at 14. Many paid with their lives. Millions more paid in WW1, WW2 Korea and Vietnam. Women, most of whom did not want the vote for the reasons just given paid nothing. But you do have to credit suffrage…
/r/MensRights13/07/22 01:23 AM
1

I am not seeing anything specifically about German feminism here, but there are a lot of comments so I need to re-read. Hmmm, that must've been in another post. My mistake. You telling me my opinions are somehow unimportant to this discussion on feminism is honestly rude. What I said was that it was irrelevant to the point I'd mistakenly thought was under discussion here, and it was. But feminists take offense at everything, don't they? I just finished my second degree, and sure as hell am able …
/r/MensRights13/07/22 01:14 AM
2

Because I actually spend time talking to other women. I work with nothing but them. Your claims were about feminists, not women. From women in their 70’s to young women still in their late teens. I understand how different feminism looks between generations So you can't tell the difference between women and feminists? No big shock. Would you believe that some men call themselves feminists and that many women do not call themselves feminists? Who knew? Women speak differently around other women t…
/r/MensRights13/07/22 01:08 AM
1

They are not mutually exclusive! I kinda see myself as both a feminist and a mens rights advocate. Well... Feminism is anti-male MRAs are about fair and equal treatment of men and are opposed by feminism every step of the way. Feminism is at least exclusive of men's rights, actually it's totally opposed.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 01:00 AM
2

That's what feminists did and it worked. Western society has always been about protecting woman and men being disposable. Last century miners went on strike for better working conditions, they were met by strikebreakers and sometimes the army and many were killed or injured. No one cared. It was not until women protested they they were losing the support of their husbands that conditions improved, and only because they would help the women. This has been true whenever men tried to get better wor…
/r/MensRights13/07/22 12:56 AM
6

I understand the man, yet the poor kid, she he didn't have to do him like that. FTFY. The man is a victim here, for which you apparently would punish him for life.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 11:48 PM
3

Apparently because there are more men in tech than women, that means that any individual man trying to find a job in tech should be fucked over by gender discrimination. Because that's equality...somehow. Exactly. It means someone has decided for political reasons only that there must always be more women. I will never understand how people think that way. Why try to solve sexism with more sexism? No sexism has been identified. And no problem either. What if, and I know this is crazy, but what i…
/r/MensRights12/07/22 11:42 PM
2

Basically the percentage of men to women in tech is like 70% to 30% so I agree, so? so companies look to hire women So much for civil and constitutional rights, eh? On my last team, there was like one other dude and the company kept hiring women. >_> Read the 1964 Civil Rights Act someday and see what it says about discriminating on the basis of sex.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 11:40 PM
1

Y'all are negative asf and don't actively do anything to fix ur own problems And what do you propose MRAs do? Feminism has been very effective at undoing any efforts to make divorce and custody more fair. Some progress has been made in spite of this. Feminism also wrote the law on DV, and of course women can't be abusers and men can't be DV victims. Have a great time at Menslib, which is literally men's rights from a feminist perspective, just don't try and talk about men's issues, you'll be ban…
/r/MensRights12/07/22 03:42 PM
6

Also, why did you insult me? Why do you paint a smiling face on feminism? Feminism has always considered men the oppressive enemy. Why do the men in this subreddit frequently insult me especially when I am genuinely trying to support them? Your support is for feminism. That's what I responded to. The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations on the part of man toward woman, having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over her. You may consider this…
/r/MensRights12/07/22 03:33 PM
1

They do indeed have a basis for responding. If they have a basis for their claims about German feminism then they can post it here. Your theory on the subject is immaterial. they weren't making specific claims about feminist theory or anything that would require a citation. I think they were very sensible. They were making specific claims about feminism creating services for men. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. I'm in a STEM field and value evidence-based approaches as much …
/r/MensRights12/07/22 03:29 PM
31

It completely ignores that the dude was applying for CS jobs. Men are already incredibly overrepresented in CS. What does that even mean?
/r/MensRights12/07/22 02:39 PM
1

So please, if you have any questions, read first what I wrote before. You claim this was done by feminists. Please show this.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 01:19 AM
1

I have no idea. Anyway, it was a nasty thing to do. Looking at it another way, the jobs held by those millions of men would now be available to women who's ranks had not been decimated. Also when women got the vote they would be a supermajority (which the UK government took into account). If you think dead men advanced the feminist cause the 'white feather' campaign made perfect sense. Because this really did nothing to get women the vote.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 01:17 AM
2

I already posted it and also explained, that I live in Germany. And I found it as I kept reading, it says nothing about feminism.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 01:15 AM
2

sexists feminists. In the UK they call that being redundant, saying the same thing twice.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 01:13 AM
1

What does not having the time to make a YouTube channel/video disqualifies me from having commentary on. Wrong question. To be more direct, if you are not interacting with the majority of feminists in some fashion, then you have no basis whatsoever for making claims about them. And apparently you have no such basis. So why make any claims?
/r/MensRights12/07/22 01:12 AM
1

That is the feminist narrative.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 01:10 AM
1

Besides of that, this year the first Consulting for men who are victims of domestic violence in my state was opened by feminists. This is a temporarily funded help line, nothing more, they offer no services. And there is no mention of feminism, at all. Please post evidence for your claim. Here is the google translate link. https://www-swr-de.translate.goog/swraktuell/baden-wuerttemberg/maenner-opfer-haeuslicher-gewalt-100.html?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en-US&_x_tr_pto=wapp Male victims …
/r/MensRights12/07/22 01:09 AM
3

Well I'm a feminist and I truly encouraged many of my male friends to talk about their feelings. Having done so, especially in front of a woman is why men stop doing so. Besides of that, this year the first Consulting for men who are victims of domestic violence in my state was opened by feminists. Funny, in the US they've done nothing but block any services for men, they wrote the VAWA which denies men recognition as DV victims and denies them any services. They wrote the Duluth model by which …
/r/MensRights12/07/22 12:57 AM
1

One wonders if Pankhurst and company thought about the consequences of such an action. You mean the deaths of millions of men and boys? What makes you think that was not the direct object? Or do you think she was an idiot?
/r/MensRights12/07/22 12:56 AM
1

There is a lot of injustice happening to women and men because of their sex, There's a lot of injustice happening to men directly because of feminism.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 12:54 AM
1

… but I don’t have/havent had the time. Mostly I just think and judge things for myself. So by what measure do you make statements about the 'majority' of feminists or the feminist movement?
/r/MensRights12/07/22 12:52 AM
2

Not always, initially it was about the right to vote They had a funny way of showing it, from the first recognized feminist document, the Declaration of Sentiments signed in 1848 in Seneca Falls NY. https://www.womenshistory.org/sites/default/files/document/2019-08/Day%203_0.pdf Declaration of Sentiments by Elizabeth Cady Stanton The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations on the part of man toward woman, having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyran…
/r/MensRights12/07/22 12:48 AM
2

I'm a rape apologistic, filthy gender traitor "lookatme" who is "not like the other girls", rejecting feminism and hanging out with men only because I'm desperate for their attention and approval. Flip that around and that's the way they view men too.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 12:41 AM
2

But they think everything they do is correct therefore anything that they don't agree with is some form of "patriarchal oppression expression". FTFY.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 12:35 AM
2

My personal opinion is that even though some people are utterly bonkers, the only way to handle such people are to stay calm, discuss things in a civilized manner with well informed facts. While it may not take two to argue, it does take two to have a discussion. So the question is, who do you think you'll be having a discussion with?
/r/MensRights12/07/22 12:34 AM
2

Birth is a process that begins at conception through delivery. That's called pregnancy. Delivery is 'birthing'. birth·ing /ˈbərTHiNG/ noun noun: birthing * the action or process of giving birth. Look, I give up, communication is impossible, you can have the final word, I'm done.
/r/AntiFeminists12/07/22 12:24 AM
1

She is will definitely be birthing the baby. It will happen in due time. FTFY. What's not clear? Have you ever heard of tenses? You know, past, present, future?
/r/AntiFeminists12/07/22 12:02 AM
1

If these economic problems are so widespread that many desperate women are facing these problems, who will raise that baby? That's not her problem. here's nothing wrong with being a birth mother inherently, but society needs its shit together in general for providing for children. I have no idea what you think you are arguing against, but you don't seem to need me for that. The article says "the unborn baby". Yeah that's what I said. Not at all, you said she's giving birth, she is not. This woma…
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/22 11:51 PM
2

This woman is birthing her baby. The article says "the unborn baby". In today's society, if childbirth is the consequence for sex, we need a society more prepared to sustain children's needs. Even in Texas the mother can drop off her newborn at the nearest fire station or hospital no questions asked and with no paperowrk. Seems there's already provision for that. All 50 states have infant safe haven laws.
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/22 11:35 PM
25

I read an article not long ago where a man was convicted of attempted murder because he tried to slip some abortifacient into his pregnant gf's drink. I don't recall the sentence, but the interesting thing is that the article says the woman later had an abortion. By the precedent just set by convicting her bf, that woman had committed murder. I do not recall the state, it would be ironic if it were Texas.
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/22 11:30 PM
13

No woman ever got pregnant on her own…. I refer you to every sperm bank patron. pregnancy is cause by men. No, men just create sperm. And this is irrelevant since a man need not be the father to be treated as one.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 04:23 PM
4

Are you sure it couldn't apply here as well? Even O.J. Simpson was not jailed for failing to pay the 'wrongful death' damages of $33 million IIRC. Contempt of court for failure to pay child support is also civil. AFAIK, this only applies to CS. But if you have other information I'd love to see it.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 04:21 PM
2

...not to encourage a murder but in that case surely Johnson would be the first target? I made a supreme effort and managed to not post that he would be a very likely first target. :-) The fact that he's still alive surely provides compelling evidence that such a crime is not becoming more common. Indeed. And he did resign, but apparently he wants to stay in office till a replacement is found. I have yet to read the UK's reaction to that.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 04:17 PM
3

The man can at any point demand a paternity test, He can also demand a ton of gold, he's as likely to get it. If unmarried the mother is unlikely to allow such a test, but it remains worthless legally unless ordered by a court. And to make sure it does not happen, there is a very short period after birth when a man can challenge paternity, in some cases 30 to 60 days. If the man doesn’t do it, he perpetuates the legal assumption. The fact that he may not even know the woman had a child till afte…
/r/MensRights08/07/22 04:14 PM
2

The pregnant woman is always the one bearing the consequences….. Some few, yes. In most cases the result of a pregnancy is a healthy mother and a healthy baby. And that's the reason why many women have sex, they want a family. The purported father can face lifelong financial damages and even life in prison, but you apparently don't think these are real damages.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 04:10 PM
10

And if you get into a car accident, you are entitled to payment for damages. Not if you cause it. Don’t kid yourself, the US does everything in its power to make child birth a not voluntary thing at all, Whut?
/r/MensRights08/07/22 04:07 PM
2

I see, but court costs can exceed $5K easily and the purported father is given both bills at the same time. I do think that this is a bigger injustice, especially given that many men don't have enough left to live on after CS. The only difference is that he does not face jail from not paying a civil case.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 04:06 PM
3

The legal father is the one charged child support. The purported father is the one that government agencies go to to recover the costs of the services they provided to the mother.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 04:03 PM
7

I don't see anything in the proposal that absolves the purported father the child support obligation, so it's $5K + court costs + CS.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 03:44 PM
24

It sounds like a woman can sue a man if she rapes him and become pregnant with his child. That's always been the case. No change here.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 03:43 PM
4

Because some few women are left with the damages! FTFY.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 03:40 PM
18

But are you really to blind to see that pregnancy and childbirth is literally a risk to very life? So is driving to work, or the store. It used to be about 50,000 traffic deaths every year, with no count of injuries. A quick google shows that driving is far more dangerous than childbirth. How common is death during childbirth in the US? Highlights. The most recent U.S. maternal mortality ratio, or rate, of 17.4 per 100,000 pregnancies represented approximately 660 maternal deaths in 2018. This r…
/r/MensRights08/07/22 03:40 PM
5

There is no requirement that the man charged CS be the father. Perhaps the most obvious example is when a married woman screws around. Guess who is legally responsible for a child that is not his.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 03:35 PM
17

Maybe, but even Supreme Court justices don't know what a woman is, so we're back to step one.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 03:17 PM
16

Yay! Another way to use false allegations and abuse the legal system!! Can't wait for predatory women to take advantage of drunk men, used condoms, and whatnot for free $$$! Women can do that now, and they do.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 03:15 PM
7

It hit the news just this morning. Some of the headlines are confusing though, reading the first headline in google news gave the impression that he was just injured. I'm sure we will get more details soon.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 03:12 PM
10

OK, I considered the perspective that men and inherently evil. I rejected it. Tell me of the feminist perspectives you agree with.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 03:05 PM
10

There will be a swift strike of the banhammer. Then you will remain silent in the feminist realms.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 03:04 PM
25

that the assassination of Japan's ex-PM Shinzo Abe may be due to 'a crime which is becoming more common here Wait, this is the BBC, so 'here' would be the UK. This is the first I've heard that assassinations are 'becoming more common' in the UK.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 12:32 PM
3

With Ohio’s new six-week abortion ban in place, a Democratic state lawmaker says it’s time for the Ohio Legislature to give consideration to her bill that holds men, who cause an unintended pregnancy, responsible whether the sex that led to the pregnancy was consensual or not. Sen. Tina Maharath (D-Canal Winchester) said her bill would allow anyone who becomes pregnant to file a civil suit against the person who impregnated them — even if it happened as a result of consensual sex. “Regardless of…
/r/MensRights08/07/22 12:28 PM
1

Ah, OK. I understand.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 12:40 AM
1

Aristophanes was a comic playwright. So his “sex strike” is similar to the transvestite lumberjack of Monty Python: not actually real. It says that right in the quoted text (except the Monty Python part, but Monty Python is not a real person either).
/r/MensRights07/07/22 02:53 PM
1

They do pay Jizya. The choice was to pay jizya or die though. In times past... https://wikiislam.net/wiki/Qur%27an,_Hadith_and_Scholars:Forced_Conversion The topic of forced conversion is a complicated one within the Islamic tradition. According to the Qur'an, there is "no compulsion in religion" and the traditional laws of jihad state that before attacking a Christian or Jewish enemy they must be offered the choice of submitting to Islamic political rule, paying the jizyah and entering dhimmitu…
/r/MensRights07/07/22 02:47 PM
1

I remember the article I read pretty well, but now that I think of it, the subject was early Islam and things like the Crusades. Convert or dies was a thing. That being said, how about today?... https://www.reuters.com/article/us-religion-atheists/atheists-face-death-in-13-countries-global-discrimination-study-idUSBRE9B900G20131210 Atheists face death in 13 countries, global discrimination: study GENEVA (Reuters) - In 13 countries around the world, all of them Muslim, people who openly espouse a…
/r/MensRights06/07/22 11:50 PM
11

I don’t advocate for either. I said in the post that I think men should make that choice when they are teenagers… I don't see any non-religious or non-medical reason why anyone would want a circumcision, same for FGM. But people do many strange things, so if they are of the age of majority (18 or 21 most places) then they can make their own decisions. EDIT: I recall a post where the poster's girlfriend wanted him to get circumcised, apparently that was what she was used to. I wonder how she woul…
/r/MensRights06/07/22 02:57 PM
14

Fair, can you provide me with studies that state that they are cutting the most sensitive part of the male body? I'm not really an intactivist and I'll decline to spend any more time on this, you can believe whatever you want. But do you also advocate for FGM? It's been stated that there are studies of a similar nature showing benefits for FGM, I have not looked for them, but the claim is out there. So if there was some claimed benefit to FGM, would you support it?
/r/MensRights06/07/22 02:49 PM
3

We all date and sleep with people based on whether or not they have like beliefs. The issue is you're claim that they have done something wrong. Having a different belief about something different, and mostly it's unimportant. My kids put ketchup on almost everything, should I kick them out of the house?
/r/MensRights06/07/22 02:46 PM
24

I believe that number has increased to the 200s but I could be wrong. Whatever the number (and admittedly it's been awhile since I last checked), one might argue that even one unnecessary death is too many. I am arguing for spreading the facts so the movement doesn’t turn into a joke. I don't think cutting the most sensitive part of the male body off to prevent him having sexual pleasure or masturbating (which are the main reasons) is funny at all. As for the article, it's from 1997 and... Abstr…
/r/MensRights06/07/22 02:13 PM
2

I've seen many people here or on r/antifeminists happily claiming that women are now equal to men, as they lost their reproductive rights. Yeah, but that's not even true. It's now a state's rights issue and it looks right now that abortion will remain legal in something like 1/2 of the states. And they will still be available in many of the other states, under more limited circumstances. And Obamacare provides all female reproductive healthcare at no cost to the woman, it not only provides nothi…
/r/MensRights06/07/22 02:00 PM
49

The penis is especially prone to those sorts of problems. Source? BTW, did you know that in the US alone about 100 babies die every year from circumcision or complications? There's a recent post about a baby that has brain damage due to excessive bleeding after circumcision. All surgery has risks, unnecessary surgery creates unnecessary risks. But apparently this is a price you are willing to pay.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 01:51 PM
2

Do they know that we have more in common with Christians than we do with Atheists ? Unless I misunderstand, Islam requires that atheists be put to death. Christians (aka People of the Book) can live but they have to convert to Islamic faith.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 01:35 PM
2

If the money you make is just for you, do you still contribute to household and child related costs though you don't have to? Does your husband get to keep a portion of his earnings just for himself? My understanding is that she has no responsibilities in this regard whatsoever. Further, if the husband provides as he is required and the wife lets the child starve to death, this husband is at fault and not the wife. It's a lot like Western Culture.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 01:31 PM
3

This feeling of I need to prove myself is gone. I still work and getting paid even higher than my husband. But that money is for me, not the household. What's his is ours, what's hers is hers. That aspect is pretty much the same in Western culture.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 01:28 PM
3

The argument is that pro life men are against women having autonomy. So they did do something wrong. What did they actually do? Just having an opinion on something is not an action for or against anything. Many women oppose abortion, have they done something wrong as well? And no, no one is actually going on a sex strike. It's clickbait. There's that, but it is a conversation starter.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 01:26 PM
1

(2) The husband has the right to chose where they live. (7) For example: It's common for young woman to put that they want to finish their education in city X and that husband cannot prevent that. There seems to be some conflict between 2 and 7. Other than that, nice summary, thanx for posting.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 01:20 PM
0

This wiki page has very little information. And it starts at 1997. October 1997 The chief of the Military of Colombia, General Manuel Bonnet publicly called for a sex strike among the wives and girlfriends of the Colombian left-wing guerrillas, drug traffickers, and paramilitaries as part of a strategy—along with diplomacy—to achieve a ceasefire. The guerrillas ridiculed the initiatives, pointing at the fact that there were more than 2,000 women in their army. The strike was ineffective.[1] The …
/r/MensRights06/07/22 12:55 PM
3

The more popular suggestion is to just not sleep with pro life men. Which is fair. Since the SC decision was no more in the hands of pro-choice men than pro-life men, I'm not sure I see the utility of punishing those innocent of any wrongdoing. Also, does this sex-strike nonsense extend any farther than the internet?
/r/MensRights06/07/22 12:48 PM
1

I dislike feminism as much as the next guy but I can't deny that the mrm is a reaction to feminism, so in a sense I feel gratitude that feminism exists. Whut? There would still be a need for the MRM, tradcons are still a thing and men's issues are basically caused by coverture being grandfathered in. That's what gave feminism leverage in the first place.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 12:42 PM
1

NOW's text is not the ERA. I never said it was the original ERA. When people say they support the ERA, they mean the actual amendment proposed by Congress. The issue here was the poster ChadWolf98 who says... I said I dont support ERA because abortion. Since the original ERA says nothing about abortion, I don't understand his comments. But the NOW re-write does include abortion, I was wondering if he had seen that and was confusing the two. The NOW ERA is the hayden rider on steroids. The Hayden…
/r/MensRights05/07/22 03:45 PM
1

That's not the ERA. As I said, in 1995 NOW re-wrote the ERA. The original ERA did not meet feminists standards. The only thing missing from the NOW re-write is equal rights.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 03:26 PM
1

I dont get you. I said I dont support ERA because abortion. This makes no sense.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 03:23 PM
1

Termination of pregnancy is abortion Yes, they just did not use the word 'abortion'. I am being trolled right? This is real. Below is the original link, it's 404 today. http://www.now.org/nnt/05-95/era.html But the wayback machine shows what it said. https://web.archive.org/web/19990117033707/http://www.now.org/nnt/05-95/era.html The link above is from 1999, here's the 1996 version. https://web.archive.org/web/19961112130140/http://www.now.org/nnt/05-95/era.html
/r/MensRights05/07/22 02:44 PM
1

No because abortion is in it Where? In 1995 NOW re-wrote the ERA to feminists standards. ERA Summit Report The following proposed language was adopted by the ERA Summit for presentation to the July 1995 NOW National Conference. "Women and men shall have equal rights and privileges regardless of class, without discrimination based on sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, race, ethnicity, national origin or color in the United States and every place and entity subject to its jurisdictio…
/r/MensRights05/07/22 01:57 PM
2

I'm against it. It would become the basis for more govt sponsored sexism the same way the 1964 Civil Rights Act was turned into Affirmative Action.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 01:49 PM
5

There is still some discrimination against women in employment Not only is that illegal, but there is active discrimination against men. but there is still some discrimination against men in the family sphere. Some? You have a gift for understatement, I hope.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 01:51 AM
18

Gives men permission to protect and provide for women and children as noble masculinity. Permission? More like a requirement.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 01:49 AM
2

OK, go on by explaining what your point is.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 11:01 PM
2

OK, what is your point?
/r/MensRights02/07/22 11:01 PM
2

Here ya go. You guys whine way too much. Look, it's apparent that you don't do questions. But asking a question is not whining. And you did not give your source. Also, what does it matter?
/r/MensRights02/07/22 08:33 PM
1

Did you literally not read the opinion of the justice on heart of atlanta? It was interstate because people often came from out of state to stay there. Which is ridiculously wrong on the face of it. All lodging commerce takes place in a fixed location, it's irrelevant where the customers come from. And for filburn would abortions not have an aggregate affect on other interstate commerce thus making it interstate? Even if true, it's irrelevant in the face of the iron clad fact that all abortions …
/r/MensRights02/07/22 08:31 PM
2

So what are your numbers and where did you get them from?
/r/MensRights02/07/22 08:26 PM
1

The dictionary definition of feminism is universally accepted, As what? Feminism is a movement, not a word, if you want to know what feminism is about look at the movement, it's words, works and activism.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 08:23 PM
1

Most women that self identify are so brainwashed by the marketing they fail to recognize the misandry. No, they simply don't care.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 08:21 PM
3

Well, there are quite a few things that are considered art, from painting to singing, and a quick google shows results all over the place. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10824-020-09403-2 How many male and female artists are there? While there are 110,938 male artists, there are only 5612 female artists. The proportion of female artists is highest for Contemporary art (9.3% are from female artists) and smallest for the Old Masters period (2.9%).Feb 13, 2021 https://www.zippia.com/art…
/r/MensRights02/07/22 08:11 PM
1

Sorry for the delay, life intrudes. wickard vs filburn Facts of the case Filburn was a small farmer in Ohio who harvested nearly 12 acres of wheat above his allotment under the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938. Filburn was penalized under the Act. He argued that the extra wheat that he had produced in violation of the law had been used for his own use and thus had no effect on interstate commerce, since it never had been on the market. In his view, this meant that he had not violated the law …
/r/MensRights02/07/22 07:56 PM
2

One of the pillars of feminism is Patriarchy Theory: the belief that there is a global conspiracy among males (including boys, as I read it) specifically to subjugate and oppress women. Nice comment but, please do not refer to men as 'males', and also don't use 'males' and 'women' in the same sentence, it serves no purpose other than to dehumanize men. If the context supports the use of 'male' it also supports the use of 'female'. Otherwise it's best to use men/women.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 03:13 PM
3

And I also agree with this.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 03:07 PM
25

“the patriarchy” is a concept discussed as early as (possibly earlier) Thomas Hobbes, one of the founding fathers of modern day free market economics and governmental practices. Feminism has invented it's own 'Patriarchy Theory', which is the Marxist concept that one group (men) oppress another group (women) for men's benefit. Patriarchy Theory: All men oppress women for men's benefit. Let’s never forget the patriarchy hurts socioeconomically disadvantaged men just as much as it does women and c…
/r/MensRights01/07/22 03:06 PM
7

Yes, if you read my quote above, people who subscribe to the patriarchy (women and men and everyone in between) do oppress others. Feminism claims that women can't oppress anyone, they also claim that misandry does not exist.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 02:42 PM
2

I believe that men and women are subject to the patriarchy. The patriarchy (I am using this term as a systemic social structure, not in reference to men). This creates struggles for both men and women. Ah yes, (with apologies to Adam Smith) the Invisible Hand of the Patriarchy. What other conspiracy theories do you believe in?
/r/MensRights01/07/22 02:40 PM
3

Ok, so should I assume that mens rights activists inherently hate women also? That's what feminism claims (and has for decades). And you are a feminist. Cool, will do. Personally I question that anything has changed.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 02:37 PM
2

I’m a feminist and I don’t hate men. So what do you think of... Patriarchy Theory? The feminist written VAWA + Duluth Model which requires police to arrest male DV victims of females? hashtag: killallmen The feminist idea that men should be reduced to 10% of the population, kept in camps, and be used only for breeding? The feminist demands for blatant racism and sexism in the workplace, in college admissions, and pretty much everywhere else? The feminist school system that gives girls better gra…
/r/MensRights01/07/22 02:35 PM
10

It does not hold up even with Patriarchy Theory.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 02:30 PM
23

The 'patriarchy' is a feminist/Marxist construct.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 02:09 PM
1

For example?
/r/MensRights01/07/22 12:42 AM
1

So this violates the US constitution which clearly states the federal government can make treaties. You misunderstand, but that's OK. You can simply do some research if you're interested.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 12:37 AM
2

We've been together for almost 2 years now. She(21F) literally hates all men. I (20M) understand why she hates a lot of men and i support her in that, but she just hates every male that exists and it's really hard to live like this. She thinks all men are abusers and even though i never hurt her physically she thinks I'm an abuser too i just didn't show it yet. Why is this not your ex-gf? Move on, find some women who likes men, you'll be a lot happier. Also, be careful how you break up, some wom…
/r/AntiFeminists30/06/22 04:54 AM
1

It's still interstate commerce Absolutely not. https://ask.fmcsa.dot.gov/app/answers/detail/a_id/249/~/what-is-the-difference-between-interstate-commerce-and-intrastate-commerce%3F What is the difference between interstate commerce and intrastate commerce? Published 12/05/2014 05:45 PM | Updated 05/05/2017 01:55 PM If you perform trade, traffic, or transportation exclusively in your business’s domicile state, this is considered intrastate commerce. If your trade, traffic, or transportation is on…
/r/MensRights30/06/22 03:42 AM
2

It doesn't matter if the goods do, the customer can do Interstate travel is not interstate commerce. Also the medicine and tools for abortions are certainly manufactured in different states so that's still interstate commerce For the abortion provider only, not the customers.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 03:18 AM
0

This is pointless and going nowhere. I'm done, I won't respond further, you can have the last rant.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 03:15 AM
2

That is exactly what is interstate commerce lmao Not at all, if a woman orders and abortion to be shipped from another state, that's interstate commerce. This is the only possibility and if you can't see it, it's physically impossible. If a woman gets an abortion in her own state, that's intrastate commerce. No goods or services have crossed state lines. If a woman travels to another state for an abortion, that's still intrastate commerce. No goods or services have crossed state lines.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 03:14 AM
1

How many trolls actually come to this sub? I found one right here. I'm done with this, you can have the last rant.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 03:11 AM
3

So the right to vote isn't provided for you? That's provided by a constitutional amendment, but at the price of being draftable to die on foreign wars (for men only). We're really getting into semantics here. Not at all, you don't seem to know a single thing about the political system or the SC. The government was previously prohibited from intervening in a woman's abortion process, so by your own definition, it was her right. Look, your stupidity is as amazing as your ignorance, but don't attri…
/r/MensRights30/06/22 03:09 AM
0

A person's right is not some divine concept. It's a legal concept. Rights are not set in stone by nature. So how is it you think that way about abortion? WE define human rights. Some few of us at best. It's been decided by the majority of Americans that women have the right to an abortion American citizens per se have no ability to create a right. The Supreme Court ruled against the will of the American people on this. So you admit that you know absolutely nothing about the political system or t…
/r/MensRights30/06/22 03:03 AM
2

There was even a poll done IN THIS SUBREDDIT a few days ago with hundreds of participants, and around 2/3 of people here supported it. How many trolls voted? Reddit polls are worse than useless. When even 2/3 of mens rights activists say abortion is okay, You have no idea who voted and you don't even realize it.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 02:59 AM
5

A right is quite literally something that you as a human being are entitled to. Nope. A 'right' is something the government is prohibited from talking from you, an entitlement is something they are obligated to provide, they as as opposite as you can get. And the US government is prohibited from paying for abortions, it's not even an entitlement.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 02:57 AM
1

Abortion is not now and never was a right. It actually was. Roe v. Wade made it so whether you liked it or not. The Supreme Court cannot create a 'right'. Don't try to pretend like any typical American's healthcare is so great. You can't read, I said that a great deal is spent on women's healthcare and men have to pay out of pocket for reproductive services. We take care of women, men are on their own.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 02:54 AM
1

Then you have congress pass a constitutional amendment. They can't do that.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 02:51 AM
1

Actually, 70% of Americans supported Roe v. Wade. Polls are slippery things, they can be gamed to produce the desired results by careful wording and question selection. If the popular opinion ruled the SC in 1973 Roe vs Wade would have been decided differently. But this has nothing whatsoever to do with the Supreme Court.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 02:49 AM
1

Because it's a "democracy" The US is not a 'democracy', it's a republic. Recite the pledge of allegiance if you recall it.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 02:46 AM
4

Rights are defined by what people believe should be expected for every person. What comic book did you read this from? In the US 'rights' are defined by the federal or state constitution sand both are very poor at enforcing the rights of men. And a 'right' is not an entitlement.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 02:44 AM
3

but we still can’t have federal protection for women’s reproductive rights? Abortion is not now and never was a right. Other than that Obamacare guarantees free reproductive health care for women only, women can get free mammograms and pap smears in every state. A vast amount is spent on women's reproductive health care and not a penny on mens. What universe are you visiting from anyway?
/r/MensRights30/06/22 02:42 AM
0

Abortion should be protected under the commerce clause because it involves interstate commerce No, it does not. Even when a woman goes out of state for an abortion that is not interstate commerce.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 02:35 AM
7

Frustratingly, there is a lot of misunderstanding as well as downright ignorance about what the Supreme Court decision means in the first place. The court did not ban abortion, as so many Twitter keyboard warriors seem to think Many think that even here. They immediately get dressed down with the facts, but many are trolls and trolling is what they do.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 02:32 AM
13

Have you ever heard of the DULUTH model of DV/IPV? While the Duluth Model was created in the 1980s, it did not gain prominance until it was incorporated in to the VAWA. The VAWA was in 1996 or so, so the Duluth Model was probably added in 2000 or so. That is, the Duluth Model was not a thing while the OP was on patrol.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 02:30 AM
3

We have a Legal System. Not a Justice System. <Ding Ding Ding> We have a winnah.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 02:25 AM
2

Short Answer: No Long Answer: The caveat is that a treaty cannot give the federal government new legislative powers. So if the federal government lacks the power to legislate over abortion (as the SC just ruled) then it cannot gain such power by way of a treaty.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 02:24 AM
6

Oh you signed a treaty agreeing to XYZ with the federal government according to the letter of the US Constitution? We don't give a shit we got state rights! If I'm not mistaken, treaties with foreign countries tale precedence over local law. This was the big thing about the APP. https://unctad.org/news/asia-pacific-partnership-creates-new-centre-gravity-global-trade Asia-Pacific partnership creates new ‘centre of gravity’ for global trade The APP overrides even local environmental laws if they g…
/r/MensRights30/06/22 12:05 AM
1

My point is just that you can’t blame transgender people for other people’s stigma towards it. My point is that you can't invent a stigma and blame it on those you accuse of having it. but it’s transphobic people who light the match. They’re the ones to blame for transgender depression So you claim. And I ask again what credentials you have that allows you to make diagnoses of this type.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 12:37 PM
1

While it is a possibility, as of yet an amendment has never been used for proposing a constitutional amendment at the federal level. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convention_to_propose_amendments_to_the_United_States_Constitution A convention to propose amendments to the United States Constitution, also referred to as an Article V Convention or amendatory convention; is one of two methods authorized by Article Five of the United States Constitution whereby the United States Constitution may be a…
/r/MensRights29/06/22 12:34 PM
0

I am a man. Red Green Pledge: I'm a man, but I can change, If I have to, I guess. Let’s say hypothetically speaking, that I’ve dealt with a lot of sexism throughout my life. I haven’t. So where do you live? This unearned hate has made me extremely depressed, and I’ve attempted suicide multiple times. Well, the trans folk say that being a man has nothing to do with your chromosomes, so you're pissing them off with your analogy. But everyone (except trans folk and maybe our latest SC judge) can pr…
/r/MensRights29/06/22 12:21 AM
2

There was a post in AskFeminists about this. Many women were in agreement, but apparently from the comments I read these women were not even in relationships. There were other women who said they were not interested in a sex strike, usually because their husbands/bfs were solidly pro-choice and they saw no benefit to it. I did not see any women or feminists post that sometimes they wanted sex too, but I did not read all the comments.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 11:37 PM
1

I don't know that and you don't know that. And it's irrelevant to what MGTOW is about anyway.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 11:33 PM
1

I am basing on the fact that they already have laws on the books around healthcare and medical procedures, so this would just be working on existing powers, not granting them additional powers. The Constitution does not enumerate a power to legislate on healthcare. As far as I know, it's constitutionality has not been challenged in court generally, but many provisions of Obamacare were challenged and were struck down by the SC. But even then, a constitutional amendment would be able to take care…
/r/MensRights28/06/22 11:32 PM
0

So we can take 'healthy mental state' off the list then.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 03:46 PM
1

Having monitored trends in MGTOW for about a decade I'm certain a large majority of self-identifying MGTOW avoid sex. My point is that going MGTOW is not the same as taking a vow of celibacy. This is true regardless of how many or few are celibate. The idea is still to have no long term relationships with women and to work on yourself. We have had a few feminists here calling everyone who disagreed with them incels, but that's neither cause nor effect. Beyond that I'm sure there are many men tha…
/r/MensRights28/06/22 03:45 PM
1

Most psychologists support transgender people because it’s seen as a perfectly healthy mental state. Nothing negative comes from it Wait, I've read that trans-folk have very high suicide rates, is this not a negative that denies a 'healthy mental state'?
/r/MensRights28/06/22 02:51 PM
2

Also some man in Canada changed his sex (on paper) and saved thousands on his auto insurance.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 02:46 PM
3

MGTOW is not a sex strike, it's a relationship strike. While there are many degrees of MGTOW, I doubt that most are celibate.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 02:35 PM
1

The Federal government has written many laws that the Constitution grants it no power to legislate over, usually the Interstate commerce clause is used as justification. But the courts are capricious and in many cases every court reverses the lower court all the way to the Supreme Court, which underscores how subjective and even political many court decisions are. https://www.heritage.org/the-constitution/report/commerce-commerce-everywhere-the-uses-and-abuses-the-commerce-clause IMPLICATIONS FO…
/r/MensRights28/06/22 02:19 PM
1

The decision by Congress to do nothing for 50 years should be the outrage here The Constitution does not grant the federal government authority to legislate in this area.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 11:50 AM
1

Same question, do you think that replacing by vaginas the very few dicks that govern would change anything per se? No so much, there's very little difference on most issues between trad-cons and feminists.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 01:51 AM
8

None of us do Especially not those babies who die of the circumcision. In the US alone about 100 babies a year die from circumcision. There's a current post about a baby boy in Israel that died from the circumcision.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 01:49 AM
7

Ducking cringe that MRAs are comparing shit like circumcision and Child Support to not having access to abortions Abortion is not now and has never been a right in the US. And in most states nothing has changed.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 01:47 AM
42

Right now women everywhere are refusing to have sex with any men, or at least this is the word in the media. I read this idea being touted somewhere, actually I recall that the article was posted here. But if it's actually happened I've not heard of it.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 01:38 AM
1

They are. They're less than cheap, unless I remember incorrectly many states are preparing to mail them for free to any woman who asks for them. I believe CA is at the forefront of this.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 01:14 AM
1

young men who were involved with a pregnancy and whose partners had an abortion Looks like the young woman found the young man's wish to raise his kids as insufficient. were nearly four times more likely to graduate from college than those whose partners gave birth. Guess who gets the entire bill for raising the child. Free clue, it's not the mom.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 12:21 AM
1

I don't understand this provision. You can sue anyone for anything in Civil Court already. But there has to be some legally viable reason for the suit, normally one would sue for damages or losses incurred by the person you are suing. As far as I know (and IANAL), there is no basis for a lawsuit here. And once someone has standing, they can sue the state and would probably win.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 12:17 AM
3

Not every woman knows she’s pregnant in time to take the morning after pill. That's not how they work. You take the pill the morning after having unprotected sex. They prevent a pregnancy from occurring.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 12:14 AM
3

Female pro choice MRAs exist so this decision wouldn’t just affect feminists There are male and female MRAs, there are male and female feminists (although some claim men cannot be feminists). Praying on the downfall of feminists is childish and just adds more fuel to the fire Who's doing what here? we should be trying to work together Feminism has declared men as the enemy and does everything it can to hurt men and boys. Working with men or MRAs is the opposite of what they want to do. If aborti…
/r/MensRights27/06/22 04:06 PM
1

Several states have putative father's registry or paternal registry. Which, as I said, only guarantees financial responsibility. It does not in any way grant an unmarried father the ability to parent. Yes, that's what needs to change, however if the woman doesnt want to parent at all you will get the custody automatically. Doubt it. And not if she drops the newborn off at a fire station or hospital.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 03:52 PM
1

there isn’t one magic surgery that turns “women” into “men”. Very good. A transgender man is always a man. What is a man? He may choose not to do any hormones and surgery and still be a man. And these hormones and surgery do what? What the word 'passing' means in the trans community? Hell, what does the prefix 'trans' even mean?
/r/MensRights27/06/22 03:50 PM
1

I’m not interested in the project of raising a human. Good for you. We need birth rates to drop if we want to stop overpopulation bud. We need there to be less humans by a few billions. That seems to be happening. Not to the point of reducing the world population by billions, but the human population is projected to stop growing at about 10 billion.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 03:47 PM
1

Source? And BTW, claiming be the father only guarantees total financial responsibility (with no regard to the actual costs), it grants no parental rights in the US at all.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 01:58 AM
1

I think that ignores the stigma around giving children up for adoption, as well as general friction What stigma? The drop-off is anonymous. It is much easier to quietly slink away to get an abortion than to hide an entire pregnancy and delivery. And it's much easier to kill the baby then to drive to the nearest dropoff spot. But their presence has only cut the baby killing in half according to an article I read. Maybe we should focus on doing the right thing rather than what's most convenient? M…
/r/MensRights25/06/22 01:56 AM
1

She is not forced to parent her offspring or pay for their upkeep.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 01:51 AM
5

I think this will cause more suicides and mental illness than it will fix. You'll have circumstances where neither parent wants the child who get stuck with it. Not so for the woman, she can drop off the newborn at any hospital or fire-station in the US no questions asked.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 03:53 PM
1

That's not clear at all... https://twitter.com/vaushv/status/1304472266588041218 im not a feminist anymore https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaush Political views Kochinski is a progressive,<sup>[7]</sup> an anti-fascist,<sup>[1][24]</sup> and a libertarian socialist.<sup>[5][16][24]</sup> He has also described himself as a "dirtbag leftist" and "a big fan of democracy".<sup>[1][6]</sup> In the 2020 United States presidential election, he opposed the "Bernie or Bust" movement and urged people to vot…
/r/MensRights24/06/22 03:42 PM
1

Well I mean earth is not just US right. What does that have to do with what I said. You should be happy that birth rates in the US are below replacement. But it should make you happy that birth rates are declining worldwide. https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/WLD/world/birth-rate Chart and table of the World birth rate from 1950 to 2022. United Nations projections are also included through the year 2100. The current birth rate for World in 2022 is 17.668 births per 1000 people, a 1.15% declin…
/r/MensRights24/06/22 03:23 PM
1

A transgender man can get pregnant and give birth, yes. A pre-op trans-man is a woman. Post op, who can say? Some people still think pregnancy is like just a part of womanhood. No woman, no pregnancy. It's basic biology. But nowadays even supreme court justices don't know what a woman is, so things are getting pretty crazy. That way any gender can create a human for themselves. It takes 2,the man creates the sperm and the woman creates the egg. Maybe someday cloning will be a thing, today is not…
/r/MensRights24/06/22 03:19 PM
133

No disagreement from me here. Just a bit frustrating when this same sort of energy is never seen for men’s reproductive autonomy. That's just not so, a tremendous amount of energy is expended in opposing men having reproductive rights.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 03:12 PM
1

But doesn’t mean they all have to You can rest easy, birth rates are at a record low and well below replacement. If not for immigration the US population would be shrinking.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 01:01 AM
1

Yes. Women still get pushed to believe they are supposed to be okay with going through pregnancy as if it’s just an inherently woman thing. Are you suggesting that men can get pregnant and give birth? Women are pushed to think they have to be mothers with a lot of the gendered girl toys and the way women are represented in media. As strong independent women who don't need no man and is superior to all the men around her? As the only one who can rescue that inept idiot, dad?
/r/MensRights24/06/22 12:59 AM
1

OK, my bad, it makes sense that way.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 12:54 AM
3

There is no general consensus on what feminism stands for Feminism is, at best straight-up woman's advocacy. Unfortunately, a great many of the things feminism does hurts men but don't help women at all. Feminism is more about hating men than helping women.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 12:40 AM
3

Try this... https://archive.ph/FXt5c The Future Isn’t Female Anymore
/r/MensRights24/06/22 12:30 AM
1

In the US, the below is true. Women have the vote whether they join the service or not. Women cannot register for the draft, you say they have to. trans-women are considered men by the SS and they do have to register for the draft.
/r/MensRights23/06/22 11:57 PM
1

I corrected you, you said... In order for women to have to vote they can just exist and register when they turn 18. Women have the vote whether they join the service or not. Women cannot register for the draft, you say they have to. If you wrote 'woman' when you meant 'man' or vice versa you might want to correct it. It's an easy typo to make.
/r/MensRights23/06/22 11:51 PM
1

For the sake of political correctness: what does a lesbian look like anyways? I dunno, but maybe lesbians can tell. /s EDIT: If you don't know what a lesbian looks like how can you kow you don't look like one? /s (don't take this seriously) I think women are just more comfortable flirting with me. Women have nothing to lose, they face no jeopardy. Men can get falsely accused of things that can ruin their lives, most know this by now and exercise caution. And as you said elsewhere, perhaps tinder…
/r/MensRights23/06/22 11:48 PM
1

In order for women to have to vote they can just exist and register when they turn 18. Women cannot register for the draft. They can join the military at 18, but they can't register for the draft. Well, trans-women have to register because the SS goes only by the sex on your birth certificate.
/r/MensRights23/06/22 11:42 PM
1

If we would live in this mysterious patriarchy in what feminists believe in, there would be no need for mens rights forums.. And feminism would not be allowed and women would not have been given the vote by men, etc, etc...
/r/MensRights23/06/22 11:39 PM
2

but my phone is drier than the Sahara. ProTip: Most phones are permanently ruined by being wet, keep them dry. but men don’t really compliment me or bother me much. They don't bother you, what's the problem? Eta: the lesbians though lmao, they love me. Well, there you go, situation explained, you must look like a lesbian somehow, I guess. /s
/r/MensRights23/06/22 11:33 PM
2

I’d call myself a feminist, I think men and women deserve equal rights, This make no sense, feminism is opposed to equal rights, you are very confused. In 1996 or so California had a voter proposition on the ballot, Prop 209. It shocked American feminism to the core and they immediately organized against it. If you're not familiar with Prop 209 it's diametrically opposite of everything feminism advocates for and supports, which is why feminism opposed it. https://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/1996/gener…
/r/MensRights23/06/22 11:27 PM
9

Anyone who was violent in a relationship. The Duluth Model defines that as the man.
/r/MensRights23/06/22 02:23 AM
1

Who is this guy?
/r/MensRights23/06/22 01:30 AM
1

Wow. That is pure ignorance! I was going to say that you're a glass-half-empty type but looking at the examples you give, I'm not sure that's even true. Feminist 5th columnist? Whut? There is no draft in the USA. I presume you are referring to the Selective Service Register. The effects of fighting the sexism there has certainly not finished but has had enormous and wide-reaching effects so far. States have changed practices on penalising men What does this have to do with SS and the requirement…
/r/MensRights23/06/22 12:41 AM
3

Your experience isn't truth. This is bizarre. My experiences are not invalidated by anything you can say, or even by your bizarre comments. If your argument that your experience says one thing is true I'm not making my argument, I'm saying that these things have been my direct repeated experiences for decades. It's a bullshit argument used to justify bigotry. It's your argument. I'm not going to validate or agree with your claim and by doing so validate every "all men" argument. You sure argue l…
/r/MensRights23/06/22 12:09 AM
1

You overestimate the victim complex. From the wikipedia page you touted... Collins refers to the various intersections of social inequality as the matrix of domination. These are also known as "vectors of oppression and privilege".[54]: 204 These terms refer to how differences among people (sexual orientation, class, race, age, etc.) serve as oppressive measures towards women and change the experience of living as a woman in society. It's not me, it's feminism. For one, many conservative feminis…
/r/MensRights22/06/22 02:53 PM
3

No, it's 3 decades of direct experience telling women and feminist what feminism actually says and does. They don't care. If you're telling them how you're coming at it right now, I'm not surprised really. Wiser and calmer heads than mine have also tried, to the same effect. It's not a matter of delivery and never was. She never said she was an MRA. Did someone claim she did? What's wrong with helping girls in some foreign country? She doesn't care? She does not care about men and boys here, no.…
/r/MensRights22/06/22 02:38 PM
1

I just got banned from MensLib, but I checked and yes, I actually did accidentally post there. I did get two comments in though.
/r/AntiFeminists22/06/22 01:29 PM
7

That is some absolutism and black and white thinking. No, it's 3 decades of direct experience telling women and feminist what feminism actually says and does. They don't care. Casual feminists like Cassey Jay who given the chance to actually see it wouldn't call themselves feminists any more. But she still is a feminist in my opinion. She shudders at the idea of being called an MRA, and she would rather be helping girls in some foreign country. She still does not care about men and boys here. Th…
/r/MensRights22/06/22 01:11 PM
0

I am a man you fucking idiot. Did I call you a woman? I think men are being played by a fucking new article because they apparently cannot even see how this is pandering to their feelings. No, it corresponds to their daily experiences. What the hell is your problem anyway?
/r/MensRights22/06/22 06:35 AM
5

Feminists don’t deny there are ways in which men could be disadvantaged. Disadvantages for men are often caused by the patriarchy Let's see, feminist 'Patriarchy Theory: says... Patriarchy Theory: All men oppress women for men's benefit How would this disadvantage men?
/r/MensRights22/06/22 06:30 AM
10

I'm sure many women who call themselves feminists are for equality No, they are not. They never have been. And nothing you can say to them will change that.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 06:25 AM
2

OK, my bad, apologies. May I introduce you to the sarcasm tag, it looks like this. /s
/r/MensRights22/06/22 05:46 AM
1

No, I was saying that the feminist movement was necessary when it first started to get women where they are today— OK, so an anti-male hate movement was needed. I guess we'll have to disagree about that. From the first recognized feminist document, the Declaration of Sentiments signed at Seneca Falls in 1848... https://www.womenshistory.org/sites/default/files/document/2019-08/Day%203_0.pdf Declaration of Sentiments The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations on the …
/r/MensRights22/06/22 05:30 AM
1

I don’t mean to say we have to suffer that today, This is what you said, and it implies that women in the past were oppressed by men in the past. I don't think that this is the OPs message. But the OP has deleted the post, so nevermind.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 04:51 AM
1

I've apologised to OP for misreading the paragraph in question. And am well aware that men can be victims, thanks. The difference is that when men are victims of women they can expect to be punished for that by society and their friends and family.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 04:45 AM
1

Just referring to the repression of the past with career/pay/ownership/voting etc… Women in the past could and did have all of those. Well, for most of history there was no such thing as a 'career' and pay was keeping some of the food you raised on the royalty's land. And women today have all of those. stuff the advocates of that time period fought to correct. You mean they wanted all the benefits of coverture with none of the responsibilities? They got that. I don’t mean to say we have to suffe…
/r/MensRights22/06/22 04:43 AM
0

That's my point, these are not cisco men, they have spent their life working towards this, the fact it resonates so well is my issue with it. So you think men have been lying about their daily experiences? Or do you think the trans-men are lying about their now daily experiences? You have issues yourself either way.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 04:39 AM
1

Also as a side thought wouldn't it seem strange for people who wanted to be men for most or all their lives suddenly having issues with getting what they want and openly admiting it Be careful what you ask for, you just might get it.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 04:35 AM
1

Well, you know.... some men are, and have been, victims. Not exaggerated or sympathy seeking 'victims' but actual ones. You could grow a lil bit of empathy yerself there mate.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 04:33 AM
1

Wait, it was my understanding that feminism had already won all the medals, gold, silver and bronze. Newsflash: World to end tomorrow, women and minorities most affected!
/r/MensRights22/06/22 04:31 AM
1

Women do come from a history of repression, and that did have a lot of negative impact on their lives Tell me more.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 04:29 AM
1

A barber states that he shaves all who do not shave themselves. Who shaves with Occam's razor?
/r/MensRights22/06/22 04:28 AM
2

I saw something where a woman joined a male bowling team and saw how differently they were treated. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-Made_Man_(book) Self-Made Man (book) Self-Made Man: My Year Disguised as a Man is a book by journalist Norah Vincent, recounting an 18-month experiment in which she disguised herself as a man—"Ned"—and then integrated into traditionally male-only venues, such as a bowling league and a monastery. She described this as "a human project" about learning. She states a…
/r/MensRights22/06/22 04:25 AM
1

I would ask... Go for it.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 04:19 AM
1

That won't work either, I've tried that for decades, the only emotion men can raise is anger, that's what happens when they start out with hatred and distrust.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 04:07 AM
1

You’re part of a sex that did historically bad, bad things. That's what feminism claims. But like most of feminist claims, it was not like that.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 04:05 AM
1

The MRM has hundreds of books; more video-hours than you could hope to watch; blogs and forums galore; political, social and legal wings; local grass-roots organisations, national structures and international coordination; left-wing and right-wing elements… And for the most part is totally ineffective at generating change. Even the biggest successes were of no benefit to men. In the UK they sued to equalize retirement age and won. But the UK has perennial budget problems and equalized women's re…
/r/MensRights22/06/22 04:03 AM
1

Male and female gender roles have evolved to cooperate and benefit one another through behavioral specialization. What makes you think this is a result of human evolution? Humans evolved from other primates who most likely ready had such structures in place. But human behavior is pretty flexible in different situations, the Eskimos I've read let visitors sleep with their wives. I've also read that in places with plentiful food and no enemies (the Polynesians were the example) there were no taboo…
/r/MensRights22/06/22 03:51 AM
1

Pretty sure like another comment said she just pissed off the judge. That was his opinion anyway.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 03:46 AM
5

She was not convicted, she made a plea deal and plead guilty. They dropped the charge of 'use of interstate commerce in the commission of murder-for-hire' so that she would not face a potential death sentence. In September 2021, they added a charge of use of interstate commerce in the commission of murder-for-hire, an offense that carries a potential death sentence. In return for her plea, prosecutors agreed to drop the obstruction charge and to recommend a sentence of life imprisonment.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 03:45 AM
1

Jennifer Lynne Faith, the Oak Cliff woman who convinced her boyfriend to shoot her husband to death, was sentenced today to life in federal prison for orchestrating the murder, announced U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Texas Chad E. Meacham. In February 2021, prosecutors charged Ms. Faith, 49, with obstruction of justice. In September 2021, they added a charge of use of interstate commerce in the commission of murder-for-hire, an offense that carries a potential death sentence. In ret…
/r/MensRights22/06/22 03:43 AM
2

I don't totally disagree with ALL feminists or ALL feminism Tell us what you agree with.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 02:49 AM
1

Feminism is not a monolith. Neither is Christianity, but there are things you have to believe to be a Christian and the same is true for feminism. Perhaps the most important is 'Patriarchy Theory', that men oppress women for men's benefit. And there are some unwritten rules that can't be broken, one of which is that you never give men a platform from which to speak. Cassie Jaye broke that rule making her documentary and she was summarily rejected from the movement and feminism destroyed her fund…
/r/MensRights22/06/22 01:44 AM
1

What you've described is not intersectionality but oppression olympics Feminism has all the gold medals. Haven't you heard, women are oppressed, apparently by everything but especially men and society. Few people would be so dense as to suppose men are always privileged over women and whites always over POC So show me the feminist recognition of the lack of 'male privilege' in any venue. In fact, intersectionality is kinda the opposite of what you seem to think it is. Got a reasonable source for…
/r/MensRights21/06/22 03:52 PM
1

Well for the time they are together there is a benefit For some people yes. For many people, no. Johnny Depp for one would disagree. but thats also part of why we care less about our partners salaries Men may not care, but women do.
/r/MensRights20/06/22 11:39 PM
1

Parody or not that is the concept of intersectionality. According to intersectionality... A man is always more privileged than a woman (even though we don't know what a woman is) A white is always more privileged than a POC a CIS person is always more privileged than a trans person etc... ad infinitum.
/r/MensRights20/06/22 01:57 PM
3

I'm sure they have instructional videos on pornhub somewhere. :-)
/r/MensRights20/06/22 01:54 PM
2

That's hilarious.
/r/MensRights20/06/22 05:08 AM
2

Japanese Curse: May you live in interesting times. Or is that Chinese?
/r/MensRights20/06/22 04:49 AM
2

Sadly, hiss dream has not come to pass.
/r/MensRights20/06/22 03:56 AM
1

To be fair, a man gets no benefit from marrying a richer woman, she gets everything in a divorce either way.
/r/MensRights20/06/22 03:21 AM
2

I think it's not so black and white in practice. That's a reality. It's happened to people I know. When asked the police said that they could arrest the man, or the man and the woman, but they could not just arrest the woman. This is in CA. Three cop cars showed up. I knew the Duluth drill. I put a movie on the TV and when the cops arrived and handcuffed me I didn't resist. See, the cops automatically cuffed you. Luckily my ex girlfriend told the truth. And if she had lied you'd be in jail with …
/r/MensRights20/06/22 02:59 AM
0

But the Duluth Model is just one factor they actually use in practice. The Duluth Model has been incorporated into the VAWA. Most police can't just arrest the woman.
/r/MensRights20/06/22 02:16 AM
1

Or is there a hierarchy in which some people are preferred? You're thinking of feminist intersectionality. Here's a handy intersectionality calculator... https://intersectionalityscore.com/ Intersectionality Score Calculator Here's one of the questions at the end of the page... How can I improve my score? Unfortunately, you are born with most of your intersectional factors. However, you can make some improvement to your score by getting more involved with Islam or Judaism, donate all excess weal…
/r/MensRights20/06/22 01:46 AM
32

Father's day is on the 3rd Sunday in June, which will be a different date every year.
/r/MensRights20/06/22 01:28 AM
1

Im saying between partner A and partner B they would choose the richer guy, thus marrying up. Wait... Partner A 3/10 looks 5/10 personality $60,000 Partner B 10/10 looks 5/10 personality $18,000 Men tend to go with partner B and women tend to go with partner A I think I misread 18k as 180k, My bad.
/r/MensRights20/06/22 01:21 AM
1

She was the one acting in a controlling coercive fashion. Blocking him in the bathroom and getting in his space. And she threw the first and only punch. The Duluth Model is still mixed with a police officers experience and other training. The Duluth Model... Duluth is predicated on the "patriarchal terrorism" paradigm of partner violence. That is, men beat their female partners in order to assert masculine dominance within their relationships. Their motives are to conform to patriarchal norms an…
/r/MensRights20/06/22 01:18 AM
1

Have you ever heard of hypergamy? Women tend to marry up. Most also don't want to support a man, so they don't. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/meet-catch-and-keep/201909/are-there-not-enough-men-worth-marrying Where Are the Marriageable Men? So how bad is it? According to the study, the kind of men that single women likely would marry, if they married—i.e., the "synthetic spouses"—were not only 26 percent more likely to hold a job, and more highly educated, but they also had nearly a 55…
/r/MensRights20/06/22 01:12 AM
1

Partner A 3/10 looks 5/10 personality $60,000 Partner B 10/10 looks 5/10 personality $18,000 Men tend to go with partner B and women tend to go with partner A Are you sure you got that the right way round?
/r/MensRights19/06/22 09:54 PM
1

Even if she has a job and makes more than you, you won't come out any better in a divorce.
/r/MensRights19/06/22 09:52 PM
11

I'll see that and raise you the draft, divorce, custody, alimony, child support, and anti-male sexual assault/harassment and rape laws. Not to mention the entire police and judicial system treats women better than men. The male-only draft was recently ruled unconstitutional, it's still male only. You're rights end the moment any woman gets mad at you, so much for unalienable.
/r/MensRights19/06/22 09:49 PM
2

Anyways, this is an MRA subreddit, not a science one. May I go back to watching dead meat's killcount on final destination now? Sure, and have a happy father's day if applicable.
/r/MensRights19/06/22 09:41 PM
2

Actually, the sun does weigh something. Separate parts of the sun are supported by the other parts, preventing them from simply falling straight to the core, therefore giving them weight in relation to the thing below it. You were talking about the sun, the whole sun, and nothing but the sun. The sun a massive but weightless orb floating in space. I mean, if the sun didn't weigh anything, then what would happen if you put it on a massive indestructible scale suspended above a supermassive black …
/r/MensRights19/06/22 09:34 PM
3

I'm surprised she wasn't arrested. Have you ever heard of the VAWA or the Duluth Model?
/r/MensRights19/06/22 09:22 PM
1

I am transitioning into the professional world. Hopefully, colleges have withheld degrees from men accused of things.
/r/MensRights19/06/22 09:21 PM
2

quotes heavier than the sun But the sun does not weigh anything. Maybe say 'more massive than the sun'.
/r/MensRights19/06/22 09:16 PM
35

The problem is sometimes they don't reciprocate or provide feedback. Men are just supposed to know somehow.
/r/MensRights19/06/22 09:10 PM
10

If you have a vagina and can use a urinal, I'll be impressed, if anything lol. They have devices for that... https://archive.ph/VQgTK The best pee funnels for camping, road trips, and more
/r/MensRights19/06/22 09:04 PM
5

I do think they should have equal rights cause everyone has unalienable rights. What unalienable rights do men have again?
/r/MensRights19/06/22 09:00 PM
1

Are many mass shootings commited by men who didn't have a positive masculine role model growing up (single mother households, etc) not enough? This is what I responded to... which then turns into a sort of self-fulfilled prophecy where those men who do commit mass shootings are trying to prove their masculinity by being violent. This is what you claimed and you need to show that this is why men do anything, much less shootings. Can you? Why are you arguing with me, when I'm literally agreeing wi…
/r/MensRights19/06/22 07:24 PM
1

How often do married women and men cheat? What do the numbers say? There are no verified numbers and they are all over the place... https://hackspirit.com/infidelity-statistics/ Infidelity Statistics (2022): How Much Cheating is Going On? What do the numbers say? The overall numbers on infidelity are alarmingly high. Some websites have published unverified numbers claiming that “about 40% of unmarried relationships and 25% of marriages see at least one incident of infidelity.” Another estimate f…
/r/MensRights19/06/22 07:17 PM
1

Somewhere in there, it became a thing if you bought her dinner and she liked you. But that's not the point, the point is that a lot of women back then did not consider dating an exclusive relationship, and they did not tell the boyfriend they were with about the others.
/r/MensRights19/06/22 03:25 AM
1

Even in the 50s Kinsey claimed 30% of males had bad a same sex experience, compared to like 12% of women. I believe he said 10%, but this has been and is still a very controversial claim... https://www.thedailybeast.com/kinsey-was-wrong-sexuality-isnt-fluid Kinsey Was Wrong: Sexuality Isn’t Fluid https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7959566/ The Kinsey scale is ill-suited to most sexuality research because it does not measure a single construct https://www.ewtn.com/catholicism/library/ki…
/r/MensRights19/06/22 01:56 AM
1

My dad says there was nothing like this when he was dating in the 70s. You could ask Mary out one week, Susan the next, Wendy, then Mary again. Until you had the talk about being exclusive, it wasn’t assumed. Even in the 70s women would often date multiple men. Runaround Sue was just a song from the 1950s.
/r/MensRights19/06/22 01:38 AM
1

It’s CPC not CCP The Chinese Communist Party (CCP), officially the Communist Party of China (CPC), is the founding and sole ruling party of the People's Republic of China (PRC). Also your wrong if you think western media isn’t just an extension of the government. Did I say anything about western media?
/r/MensRights19/06/22 01:37 AM
1

I think lesbianism/bisexuality will be a drop in the ocean compared to polyamory. On rare occasions when I can't find any music I want to listen to, I dial the local PBS station. A few months ago I heard the (female) news announcer state this exact same idea as if it was a normal and expected thing. I really don't trust PBS for news, but I occasionally find out about things going on that I had not heard from other channels.
/r/MensRights19/06/22 01:09 AM
2

The examples of hypocrisy you have pointed out, will never have to be addressed. Because nobody is holding them to any standards. It's especially true that no feminists object to even the most blatant anti-male sexism or hatred. The is no radical feminist minority, the entire movement supports everything done in the name of feminism.
/r/MensRights19/06/22 01:04 AM
5

As in Russia, the CCP controls the news. Actually they literally own the news.
/r/MensRights19/06/22 01:01 AM
2

The vast majority are not prosecuted due to lack of evidence Not so, the DAs in most places claim that it is not in the public's best interest to prosecute false accusers, most likely due to the canard that doing so would make real rape victims less likely to come forward. It's a policy decision and the evidence or lack thereof is irrelevant, but they generally won't even investigate.
/r/MensRights19/06/22 12:55 AM
19

Looks like she was pretty good at destroying the evidence. And apparently she's being charged with evidence tampering, but most likely the maximum penalty for that is not much compared to murder.
/r/MensRights19/06/22 12:51 AM
9

That specific stereotype is what many men's issues stem from. Yeah, thanx feminism. Due to the feminist written VAWA plus the feminist written Duluth model, a male DV victim who calls the police is more likely to be arrested than not, he won't receive any help of any kind, and he may end up killed by the police. What is the feminist written Duluth Model you might ask? Duluth is predicated on the "patriarchal terrorism" paradigm of partner violence. That is, men beat their female partners in orde…
/r/MensRights19/06/22 12:37 AM
6

It's blaming the very widespread stereotype that masculinity=violence That's the feminist stereotype. which then turns into a sort of self-fulfilled prophecy where those men who do commit mass shootings are trying to prove their masculinity by being violent. Can you document this happening? Trying to tackle the stereotype that men must be violent in order to be masculine is the right move forward. Then you need to talk to feminism, the entire field of psychotherapy, and the APA.
/r/MensRights19/06/22 12:32 AM
5

When was the last time a man in China It could be happening daily and we'd be unlikely to hear about it.
/r/MensRights19/06/22 12:29 AM
3

Single mothers might cause mass shootings, but other countries with similar rates of single mothers don't have similar rates of mass shootings As far as I know, the UK is as anti-male as the US, if not worse in some ways, but they don't have handguns, so that kind of shooting spree is impossible. But as I was recently corrected, they do have rifles, so some sort of shooting is possible.
/r/MensRights19/06/22 12:29 AM
4

100% of mass shooters everywhere have (or had) a nose... Imagine the carnage if Cyrano de Bergerac was alive today. :-)
/r/MensRights19/06/22 12:27 AM
5

Why is it that these things seem to be happening mostly in FLA?
/r/MensRights19/06/22 12:23 AM
36

I haven't read the article yet but if the above is true, how is that verdict even possible? Pretty sure self defense doesn't cover not calling 911 for half a day, waiting for someone to die while you fish for a new hubby. I gotta read this now! My best guess is that they charged her with something that they could not prove, maybe 1st degree murder, idk. Full disclosure: I have not read the article yet, this is just a guess.
/r/MensRights19/06/22 12:22 AM
3

Their you go.
/r/MensRights19/06/22 12:16 AM
13

I don’t think a woman’s rights movement is necessarily a bad thing or even not needed in modern society. So you think open hate and sexism are needed in society, check. The main problem imo is the direction the movement has gone. Feminism has always been about hating men. From the first recognized feminist document, the Declaration of Sentiments signed in Seneca Falls NY in 1848... https://www.womenshistory.org/sites/default/files/document/2019-08/Day%203_0.pdf The history of mankind is a histor…
/r/MensRights18/06/22 11:23 PM
1

Depression is a horrible pit that sometimes has a cause, sometimes it does not, I tend to think everything has a cause, or causes. Now figuring out what they are and what to do about them, that's another story.
/r/MensRights18/06/22 09:26 PM
9

Women spend hours getting made up specifically to be noticed, then when they are, feminists claim objectification. It's one of the ways women compete for social standing. She's not dressing up for you.
/r/MensRights18/06/22 09:23 PM
5

And that's the reason why hurricanes have female names Women complained and they changed it. https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/aboutnames_history.shtml The practice of naming hurricanes solely after women came to an end in 1978 when men's and women's names were included in the Eastern North Pacific storm lists. In 1979, male and female names were included in lists for the Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico.
/r/MensRights18/06/22 09:18 PM
0

Very well put.
/r/MensRights18/06/22 09:16 PM
1

And, why should women not have to contribute. They don't. Women take more out of the system than they pay in taxes.
/r/MensRights18/06/22 09:15 PM
1

This
/r/MensRights18/06/22 07:24 PM
1

I mean, look, I'm not the sort of guy to go around accusing people of having privilege, or suggesting they "check it" You did not say 'check it' I agree. But none of the above has anything to do with the concept of privilege. They are all references to individual circumstances. 'White Male Privilege' is a feminist concept that says all white males are privileged because and only because they are white males. They don't have to be rich and they don't have to own a house, both are irrelevant WRT '…
/r/MensRights17/06/22 09:59 PM
1

holding the deadliest weapon known to man...the flipflop... Sorry, have you ever seen Team Fortress 2? The deadliest weapon is a mackerel. And arguably, the main difference between now and the past is the internet and people now have ready access to information that was previously unavailable. Also, our records of the past are sparse and spotty, some things we know well, for many things we know little or nothing. That being said this is not a phenomena restricted to Americans. And even on the we…
/r/MensRights17/06/22 09:40 PM
1

Interesting, I'm still reading it but this is a 2018 paper and it says... Pen pal sites There are several websites, such as http://www.loveaprisoner.com, whose mission is to connect inmates with the "outside" community. Loveaprisoner.com enables friends and family to stay in contact with people in prison and boasts of a 75% compatibility rating for individuals who join in search of a soul mate among prison inmates. The website, writeaprisoner.com, posts profiles, photos and contact information a…
/r/MensRights17/06/22 08:20 PM
1

Eeem, you can look at their post history and you can tell. Probably, but it's rarely with the effort and unless there's something bizarre about the post I don't bother. And I did said op was wrong. OK.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 06:30 PM
2

It's still happening today, according to the article it happens about twice a year in Oklahoma. If this is consistent that would be 100 marriages to convicts a year across the 50 states. There's even a name for it, hybristophilia.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 06:28 PM
1

Good point. But normally, a President cannot by himself affect societal change, it takes the support of congress and the people. It remains to be seen how this falls out. But still it's progress, something that you guys haven't made. Or least, far more progress than what you guys have managed. It is progress, but let's see if it survives the female and feminist backlash. And as with Trump, progress is easily removed by the next elected president. So the question is whether any changes (I am not …
/r/MensRights17/06/22 04:54 PM
1

Don't get me wrong, much of the core reasons remain the same, but "the bad boi shtick" wasn't as predominant far back as it was in a limited timeframe lf american history. What makes you think this is a statistical blip in 2005? These things happen all the time. https://archive.ph/OvbV4 "This isn't about attention": Anti-death penalty activist marries Oklahoma death row inmate McAlester Okla. — Anti-death penalty advocate Lea Rodger says she's keenly aware of the realities facing her and Richard…
/r/MensRights17/06/22 04:37 PM
1

Many men post their experiences here, they are not assumptions.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 02:03 PM
2

Not saying we are not, but there are some males in this subreddit that just male versions of feminists You don't know whether any poster is a male or female. and we gotta be better than that. The OP says we have to be more like them.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 02:01 PM
5

But of a history of misandry and screwing over men and even other women for their own benefit Those were the successes of feminism, the goals of feminism. Feminism has succeeded in reaching most of their goals, no matter how wrong or unconstitutional. As a movement feminism has been quite successful and because of that has become quite powerful.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 03:24 AM
2

Not only that, recently the mens groups caused a known Anti-Feminist politician to be elected as their new Prime Minister. Good point. But normally, a President cannot by himself affect societal change, it takes the support of congress and the people. It remains to be seen how this falls out. Trump, of all people was the first to effect some positive changes for men, and Biden has erased most of those changes already. Therefore it would appear that taking a leaf out of the feminist playbook (the…
/r/MensRights17/06/22 03:22 AM
1

but it doesn't actually change the fact that they had that privilege given to them Tell me more.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 03:11 AM
8

Well, I can't put the video through google translate, but I can the title. Yesterday around 7 pm, a driver who got into a conflict with a female driver was stabbed in the Brno-Bystrc district.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 02:18 AM
2

Please explain it, I don't have a clue what you are saying.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 02:16 AM
1

No, because feminism failed. How has feminism failed?
/r/MensRights17/06/22 02:13 AM
2

We gotta be better than feminists. Are you saying we are not better then feminism?
/r/MensRights17/06/22 02:11 AM
1

it's basically become a robotic and automatic response to anyone who wants to properly fight back As of yet, no one has found an effective way to fight back.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 02:09 AM
2

It's not clear whether Godwin's Law applies outside usenet, but I think the principle is still valid.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 02:07 AM
4

All radical groups have a relatively small following. Not feminism.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 02:03 AM
2

I don't think MGTOW is a movement at all, each individual goes his own way. Hell, the MRM is not a movement either, it's a loose association of like minded individuals (mostly men, but women too) discussing men's issues.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 02:02 AM
5

Isn’t there plenty of hate and misinformation about women regardless? For example?
/r/MensRights17/06/22 01:56 AM
3

This article claims it is due to chemicals in the water More specifically, excreted birth control pills and estrogen mimics. Temperature is also a big factor. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfb.14429 Sex determination in fishes is probably best seen as a threshold trait, i.e., processes that occur early in development can act as a switch that determines the cascade of processes of gonad development (Beukeboom & Perrin, 2014). Regardless of whether these early processes have a geneti…
/r/MensRights17/06/22 01:50 AM
6

I saw a cartoon somewhere where there was a black man at a KKK rally and one of the others asked, 'why is he here?', and it was because the government had forced them to integrate. On a more real note... https://www.ted.com/talks/daryl_davis_why_i_as_a_black_man_attend_kkk_rallies?language=en Why I, as a black man, attend KKK rallies | Daryl Davis | TEDxNaperville Too bad men can't attend feminist rallies and get the same result.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 01:41 AM
17

If you want to know what feminists want in male allies you need to look up the term 'check your privilege'. Basically it means that male allies must be subservient to women. They literally use words like 'men should know their place'. So any man who is not a slave to women would be seen as a poor ally. In reality though, even if they were slaves to women I think they would be seen as poor allies. It's a lose-lose situation.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 01:35 AM
4

All relationships are based on give and take. Traditionally, it's more like men give and women take. Divorce did not change the man's obligations, the woman has no obligation to the man in either case. If someone can't offer me what I need, then me offering them what they need makes the relationship one sided and you start feeling taken advantage of. I have a feeling that a great many men, including myself, can agree with that from personal experience.
/r/AntiFeminists17/06/22 01:27 AM
4

But women would never reward violent or aggressive behaviour in men. Don't be so sure. https://www.sfgate.com/news/article/No-shortage-of-women-who-dream-of-snaring-a-2689657.php No shortage of women who dream of snaring a husband on Death Row / Experts ponder why deadliest criminals get so many proposals "A lot of women are really taken with the man's criminal case, and they overwhelmingly believe these men are innocent," said Rick Halperin, a history professor at Southern Methodist University …
/r/MensRights17/06/22 01:04 AM
1

I’ve watched the ted talk and her documentary, it’s one of the reasons I gained interest in the movement initially. So you come here and post a question that was answered in the movie? Is there a point to this?
/r/MensRights16/06/22 02:14 AM
1

I have been civil and posted in good faith. I would think good faith posting means you respond to the words and ideas the other person posts, but that's just me. Regardless I did not accuse you of posting in bad faith, or anything else for that matter. The simple fact is that you do not object to any feminist sexism and hate, you give them a free pass and still call yourself a feminist. This is par for the course. You can change that anytime by stopping calling yourself a feminist, but I don't t…
/r/MensRights15/06/22 03:50 PM
1

and feel as though I have had my question answered as well So what did you learn?
/r/MensRights15/06/22 01:57 PM
1

I have now objected several times to the notion that women can’t be perpetrators of abuse- You objected once, to the idea though and not to the feminism who wrote the laws requiring that male DV victims of women be arrested. It seems unlikely that you will ever object to feminism no matter what it does. And I don't think that the word 'object' describes your stance, you won't object to feminism no matter what. I think a more accurate term for your position is doesn't support, but you actually su…
/r/MensRights15/06/22 01:56 PM
1

Sorry, where on Earth are you getting the impression that I don’t care about these things? By your total lack of response and summary dismissal of the idea that there was anything to discuss.
/r/MensRights15/06/22 02:34 AM
1

I have objected, I’m not sure how I can make this any clearer. I don’t agree with all aspects of feminism as it defined in this sub This is not an objection, and you are objecting to this sub rather than feminist actions that harm men. There are aspects of feminism I disagree with You don't seem to understand the concept of disagreement. I simply haven’t been asked about them and was even told not to speak over men. Talking above anyone is impossible on reddit I'll bet you do this to men all the…
/r/MensRights15/06/22 02:31 AM
1

Wow. How about the things in Karen Straughan's post? The list of things feminism has actively done to harm men is very very long, but I have a feeling that you really don't care about stuff like that, it's no skin off your nose, is it?
/r/MensRights15/06/22 02:20 AM
1

However I don’t like that you’ve said that I’m fine with a feminism that seeks to harm male DV victims. You are fine with it, you won't object and you still call yourself a feminist. I don’t disagree with any all aspects of feminism FTFY. I don’t agree with all aspects of feminism as it defined in this sub The feminists who write the VAWA and Duluth model had nothing to do with this sub, they simply hate men. speak about my feminism on here unless I am directly asked. I did ask and we are discus…
/r/MensRights15/06/22 02:18 AM
1

That is not an objection. You have merely stated your belief.
/r/MensRights15/06/22 02:09 AM
1

And let me add my response... Apparently I missed the second negative. But... You are a feminist Feminism has written laws requiring the police to arrest male DV victims of women based on the feminist written Duluth Model which says women can't be abusers. And you have not one word of objection and you apparently are fine with a feminism which seeks to harm male DV victims. Same as every other feminist.
/r/MensRights15/06/22 02:03 AM
1

Sorry, I used a double negative so I think you misunderstood what I said. Apparently I missed the second negative. But... You are still a feminist Feminism has written laws requiring the police to arrest male DV victims of women based on the feminist written Duluth Model which says women can't be abusers. And you have not one word of objection and you apparently are fine with a feminism which seeks to harm male DV victims. Same as every other feminist. Karen Straughan came up with a list of thin…
/r/MensRights15/06/22 02:02 AM
1

In short I’ve noticed that many people on the subreddit misinterpret feminism as misandry or as a movement intended to take away the rights of men whilst placing women at a higher position in society. And later she says this... I don’t believe women can’t be perpetrators of abuse. Her equality denies men the ability to even defend themselves from female violence, which she does not consider abuse.
/r/MensRights15/06/22 01:49 AM
1

I don’t believe women can’t be perpetrators of abuse. Definitely found the feminist. I hope you don't slap your boyfriend (should you have one) around cause you think it's funny, and the same goes for your girlfriend. But apparently you think you can be as violent as you want cause women can't be perpetrators of abuse. EDIT: And as usual said claims about striving for equality turn out to be lies.
/r/MensRights15/06/22 01:44 AM
1

My point was, as I said, marriage doesn’t to seem to be great overall. It can be. Marriage is not in itself good or bad, it depends on the people. Something like 1/2 of marriages end when one of them dies. Remove “raw deal” it seems to suck the life out of both parties which was my point. It's not done that to me.
/r/MensRights14/06/22 02:10 PM
11

James Patterson, a best-selling author with an estimated net worth of $800 million, opened up about how difficult it is for white men to find work in publishing and Hollywood. The thriller novelist said white male writers experience "another form of racism" in an interview with The Times published Sunday, lamenting the plight of older white males. "What's that all about?" Patterson mused. "Can you get a job? Yes. Is it harder? Yes. It's even harder for older writers. You don't meet many 52-year-…
/r/MensRights14/06/22 01:57 PM
18

It's a good thing she did not name the article 'how to murder your husband and get away with it'. Seriously though, this is pretty much the plot for the movie Basic Instinct, except I recall that in the movie she did get away with it.
/r/MensRights14/06/22 01:53 PM
1

I look at the outcomes. With women initiating so many divorces, as well as so many being more reluctant to date after divorce, AND less likely to want to cohabit after divorce as well, the answer is pretty clear to me. I don't see anything here that makes either marriage or divorce a raw deal for women. Anecdotally, I work in a geriatric facility and most of the little old ladies are divorced and express disdain about marriage. Still no raw deal.
/r/MensRights14/06/22 01:49 PM
1

What do you mean by work equality? Typo, I fixed it. What do you mean by the word 'equality'? Equality of what? I’ve already said what I strive for You can't strive for 'equality' as the word equality by itself means nothing. In 1996 or so feminism wrote the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) which among other things denied male DV victims of women recognition as victims and denied them any resources, thanx feminism. But this was not enough, they had chosen the Primary Aggressor model and some fe…
/r/MensRights14/06/22 01:45 PM
1

Not so, I read all the comments and you did not say what you mean by the word "equality", equality of what? And you also do say what you strive for.
/r/MensRights14/06/22 10:25 AM
1

Mayhaps, marriage seems to be a raw deal for both parties at this point, In what way do women get a raw deal?
/r/MensRights14/06/22 10:20 AM
1

Like I’ve mentioned before, my position as a feminist is striving for equality between both sexes What does this even mean? Probably you mean equality of outcomes bought and paid for by violating men's Civil and Constitutional rights. What do you strive for?
/r/MensRights14/06/22 09:58 AM
3

Canadian Coffee shop discriminating against CIS White males when hiring The article gives a 'bad gateway' error. But how do they know he's CIS? And what if he identifies as Asian? https://dilbert.com/strip/2022-05-02
/r/MensRights14/06/22 12:30 AM
229

I thought I read somewhere that she had $5 million or so. If this is correct she can pay some of it. EDIT: Maybe not, the article places her net worth between $1.5 and $2 million USD. Heard’s net worth has been estimated at between $1.5 million and $2.5 million as of Thursday, according to the Celebrity Net Worth site and other outlets — a far cry from what she owes Depp in the wake of the jury’s ruling. Amid the lurid, six-week defamation trial, Heard and multiple witnesses had testified that t…
/r/MensRights14/06/22 12:01 AM
1

Let's say you actually gave a shit about men being in prison. Grave damage is done by the accusation alone, even if there is no trial. Does that concern you? And there is on man falsely accused of thieft and 1000 men in prison for mowing grass. See? You had to make up numbers to try and make a case. And that makes my point, if you don't know anything about X, you have no basis for comparing X with Y. And you keep point at the guy falsely in prison for thierft and ignoring the 1000. People are go…
/r/MensRights13/06/22 11:59 PM
1

What do you know, there's an as of yet untapped domain for comedy. But I don't think they'd understand it in the Programming Humor sub.
/r/MensRights13/06/22 11:52 PM
2

Ok. I still don't see the connection to this post. I did not respond to the post, I responded to your comment.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 11:14 PM
1

Fantastic video. Well worth the watch.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 11:09 PM
25

Where did this pie chart come from?
/r/MensRights11/06/22 10:12 PM
4

What point are you trying to make with this? If you plan to destroy the nuclear family, as feminism does, then giving women all the good jobs will accomplish this as women almost never marry down. Hypergamy will kill marriage in this situation.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 10:02 PM
4

You can't read.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 09:59 PM
3

wouldn't it make MORE sense to divide things equally since both men and women contributed to the assets? Why the need to divide anything, why not you leave with everything you came in with, and only joint property gets divided?
/r/MensRights11/06/22 09:42 PM
3

Surely you can see that this is happening less and less in modern times, lots of women now are making as much or more money than men, have careers similar to men's careers, work as much as men etc. Consider the results of this... https://archive.ph/KfteZ Lack of ‘economically-attractive’ men to blame for decline in marriage rates, study suggests The study, published in the Journal of Marriage and Family, analysed data collected on recent marriages between 2007-2012 and 2013-2017, which were gath…
/r/MensRights11/06/22 09:36 PM
6

Feminism does not mean overcompensating women to make up for the patriarchy. It always has.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 09:29 PM
-2

when I heard the phrase "Women are human beings; Men are human doings." More realistically it's... Women are human beings Men are human doings Apparently women have inherent value and men need to bring something else to the table for some reason.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 08:29 PM
1

What makes you believe the first paragraph you wrote? What makes you believe otherwise? Feminism is about gender equity BBBzzz wrong answer, feminism is straight-up female advocacy and that's all it has ever been. It is not about hating men We'll have to agree to disagree about that. You should read fully about the feminist movement. Been doing so for decades. There is nothing wrong with wanting equity for all genders. Maybe you should tell feminism that it needs to change direction. In 1996 or …
/r/MensRights11/06/22 08:26 PM
1

Read that. Why? As I said, feminism is a movement made of real (mostly) women who do and say real things. They define feminism by their words and actions and activism. Gender isn’t even binary so it’s not men vs women. No, it's feminism vs men. And 'male' is a sex, chromosomes XY and female is a sex, chromosomes XX, you need both for the species to survive. Feminism has no issues blaming everything they deem wrong in the world on men, maybe you should talk to feminism? And what does a meaningles…
/r/MensRights11/06/22 08:15 PM
3

There's no link to the bill in the article. And it's a bit dated... Posted: Nov 21, 2018 3:21 PM MT If passed, the law would come into effect on Jan. 1, 2020. So where did you get the information that the law is gender neutral? I missed this the first time... The law was made redundant by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. So apparently the wording of Bill 28 is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 08:06 PM
4

So, more men lose assets etc on divorce/breakup because they "choose" to date someone who is financially lower. It's a woman's choice who they date and marry and hypergamy is a thing.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 07:19 PM
2

But, the woman in that scenario could also lose half of her assets/property. Source?
/r/MensRights11/06/22 07:17 PM
53

And things like this are why MGTOW is growing. And no, I'm not MGTOW, I'm married with children (with apologies to Paul Simon, you can caallll meeeee Al :-). I just understand why MGTOW is a thing.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 07:15 PM
0

Well said.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 07:10 PM
2

When every abortion averted from black parents will result in a black baby, This is not guaranteed. Many pregnancies spontaneously abort. But generally it's true. I still do not understand feminist logic. The SQL coder in me calls this an improper join. Is not logic a tool of the patriarchy?
/r/MensRights11/06/22 07:08 PM
5

Agree with your overall point though most of those numbers are past justices that no longer have power. I think the current court is 4 women and 8 men, but I’m not positive about that. Well at least one on the court does not know what a woman is, so there seems to be some uncertainty in this determination. So the count is something like... Men: 8 (+/- 1) Women: 4 (-/+ 1) Unless any of them identify other than what one might assume.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 06:59 PM
3

More men are murdered than women, but we don’t have different murder laws for men than women. Brazil does... https://www.reuters.com/article/us-brazil-femicide-women-s-rights/brazil-passes-femicide-law-to-tackle-rise-in-gender-killings-idUSKBN0M61YO20150310 Brazil passes femicide law to tackle rise in gender killings BOGOTA (Thomson Reuters Foundation) - Brazil, where a woman is killed every two hours, is imposing tougher punishments on those who murder women and girls, as part of a government b…
/r/MensRights11/06/22 06:35 PM
1

I don't think the feminism in any country is different from American feminism. I've been reading of feminist doings in Scandinavia, in the UK, in India and many other places over the years, it has not changed. What metoo did was to weaponize rape accusations, a man's life could be ruined by an anonymous false rape accusation, due process was thrown in the trash bin. But the effect of a rape accusation has not changed. I should imagine some man accused could sue metoo for to disclose the accuser …
/r/MensRights11/06/22 06:26 PM
1

There is a big ass book called Feminisms that talk about a lot of the philosophy and history and types of feminism as it evolved. There are courses on this as part of a political philosophy degree. The only difference between these different feminism's is their rationalizations for hating men. So one feminism wears red hats and this other feminism wears green hats, it's a distinction without a difference as the hat color is as irrelevant as the different justifications given for hating men. Ther…
/r/MensRights11/06/22 06:03 PM
1

I think you are under the impression I don't think criminal justifice system isn't fucked. But do seriously think that all 16k men are all falsely accused? You seem to be all or nothing. Either every man is falsely accused or there is no problem. You bring numbers into an issue of right and wrong and justice for the purpose of dismissing injustices to individual men. It's a very feminist way to argue. Just as an aside why do you think the case of Barry Jones hasn't been more talked about in men'…
/r/MensRights11/06/22 05:48 PM
1

Feminism is more of a philosophical concept. Feminism is a movement made of real people (primarily people of the female persuasion). The movement is lead by female supremacists and good luck finding any feminist anywhere who has any objections whatsoever. Good luck finding any women who will object as well because most will not object, even when presented with evidence of feminist hate and sexism. Even some men are like that, but I think far fewer than the number of women.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 05:09 PM
1

That's fine, you are doing great - please let me share an advice about changing views: You are not going to be able change any religiously held views. Typically and assuming you had some meaningful discussion/s that left an emotional trace, it will take about 1 year before the person changes views, toward your understanding. Source? For various psychological reasons they will almost never say "you were right" and will mostly not even notice they changed attitudes, After arguing passionately in a…
/r/MensRights11/06/22 05:05 PM
1

Obviously I denounce them. I think these laws are messed up. That is why I’m here, trying to better my understanding. Read the comments, if the lived experiences of men won't convince you, what is your purpose of being here?
/r/MensRights11/06/22 01:07 AM
1

As with any movement, many of the loudest feminists are an assortment of people with no understanding of theory throwing words around that they don’t understand. You can deny reality all you want, it remains reality. I am legitimately curious about mens rights groups, I genuinely want to learn about these issues, Read the sidebar, everything you claim you want is there. But that does not seem to be your purpose.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 01:04 AM
1

That said, I am not an MRA and I object feminism and at the same time am critical of the concept of a men's rights movement - please make sure to make the distinction between the concrete rights of women and men, and the two political movements. The MRM has no political power. Most MRAs are simply victims of the reality feminism has created. That being said your exposition seems more feminist than neutral.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 01:03 AM
1

Coined 'by' a woman you mean. Can you explain the relevance?
/r/MensRights10/06/22 11:51 PM
2

This. Don't generalize a whole movement based on the bad apples inside it. Show me the good apples.
/r/MensRights10/06/22 11:47 PM
1

Not at all. That isn’t what feminism means. The word 'feminism' does not 'mean' anything. Feminism is a movement, not a word. The word 'feminism' means what feminists make it mean. That's why 'feminism' has become the new f-word'.
/r/MensRights10/06/22 11:46 PM
1

Feminism is too broad. I think you are referring to female supremacists, not feminists. What's the difference?
/r/MensRights10/06/22 11:45 PM
1

The past five years have seen the rise of an Orwellian newspeak: "discrimination is equality", Where were you when, in 1995 or so California's Prop 209 was being debated? Last 5 years? I don't thinks so.
/r/MensRights10/06/22 11:36 PM
1

The only ones who can stop the feminist hate are women So you say. Me, I have doubts. and for that reason men must: 1) explain to women what living under such hate means, It's been tried 3,141,159 times and almost never works. Cassie Jaye is an interesting case, but she asked MRAs. Mostly women won't listen and don't care. 2) ask women to demand of feminists to stop this. Good luck with that.
/r/MensRights10/06/22 11:33 PM
1

Try again... Says the person focused on a issue that effects almost no men. You have no way of knowing. Your claim was about false rape accusations. Tell us your way of knowing how many men are affected.
/r/MensRights10/06/22 12:34 AM
4

I don't call myself a feminist, but I think it's good women have more rights, What the start of the sentence gave, the end of the sentence took away. Women worked hard, sacrificed etc. What did they sacrifice?
/r/MensRights09/06/22 03:33 PM
4

Voluntary Termination of Parental Rights Voluntary terminating one's parental rights is almost always used specifically in the case of a birth parent surrendering their child for adoption. So this is something the mother can do. This can be a complex process, and often involves working with an adoption agency, and also the future adoptive parents. Bullshit, Pennsylvania has safe have laws, the mother can drop the child off at the nearest fire station or hospital. https://www.dhs.pa.gov/secretsaf…
/r/MensRights07/06/22 02:02 AM
2

Maybe if you read both you could answer that question yourself?
/r/MensRights07/06/22 01:52 AM
14

In the centuries of its existence, feminists have never fought for something that actually hurts men Yes they do, they do it all the time. And they write things like the VAWA + Duluth Model so that the police will arrest male DV victims of women.
/r/MensRights07/06/22 01:51 AM
1

Reality intruded. Faludi’s main proposition is that masculinity has been rendered essentially decorative, being that there’s nothing really that men can now do that women can’t. My take on this is that she's saying that men are now useless. “Show me feminists who don’t hate men.” “Well, Susan Faludi, for one.” “She’s a feminist.” “Yes.” Do you get points for lying? You made a claim.... The obvious rejoinder — as I set out in my initial statement — is that their are a diversity of feminisms and n…
/r/MensRights07/06/22 01:25 AM
1

You have no way of knowing. I actually do. Great, tell us. You can be concerned about anything you want. So you changed your mind then?
/r/MensRights07/06/22 01:18 AM
1

You didn't asked one. That's a comment I responded to your claims, you ignore everything and move the goalposts. I asked you to respond to the issues you yourself raised. So you don't care at all about any of the issues I posted? Not one word of response? Since you don't respond to issues or questions yourself, you should stop demanding that others respond to you. Says the person focused on a issue that effects almost no men. You have no way of knowing. And again you prove that you could care le…
/r/MensRights06/06/22 11:59 PM
2

To be fair, apparently most of those issues were caused by Heard, coping methods for the hell she was putting him through.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 11:22 PM
2

I did not see a quote, but some source said that JD had said that he would not touch Disney with 1000 10-foot poles. So maybe he's had enough of Disney after they tossed him for no reason.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 11:20 PM
7

would be looking for a feminist woman, who is more likely to share the financial burdens with him Source?
/r/MensRights04/06/22 11:13 PM
2

How do women objectify men? There is no such thing as 'objectification', it's just another tool feminism has invented to attack men.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 11:09 PM
1

Hello I am 12 years old (male) and have been following this subreddit for a while now. It got me thinking, how can I help stop the sexism and violence against men? It's a good question, and I wish we had an answer, we don't. A few minor victories have been won in court, but some of those were lost on appeal. In general we are losing ground every year. At this point the best thing you can do is to be aware of the situation and take whatever steps you can to protect yourself. If you raise your voi…
/r/MensRights04/06/22 10:58 PM
2

A former police officer who sexually assaulted at least two teenage boys was sentenced this week to 20 years in federal prison, announced U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Texas Chad E. Meacham. Delia Ruiz, an 31-year-old former officer with the Friona Police Department, pleaded guilty to enticement of a minor in January. She was sentenced on Wednesday by U.S. District Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk. Wow, they actually named her. Given the crown I suspected this was in the UK, but it's Texa…
/r/MensRights04/06/22 10:52 PM
1

You still haven't answered if you think rape is an under or over reported crime. You ignored my questions, it's hypocritical to demand of others what you refuse to give them. Do you think being called a feminist is an insult? It's an accurate description of anyone who ignores men's suffering, if not someone who causes it outright. Everyone deserves justice, and jailing innocent men for a crime they did not commit is not, let me be the first to tell you, justice. Are you purposely avoiding unders…
/r/MensRights04/06/22 10:50 PM
1

That's the point, if the 'what if' question requires impossible conditions, then of what value is any answer. An old 'what if' question is what would happen to the earth if the sun disappeared. Of course the issue here is the propagation speed of gravity. Unfortunately, except maybe in sci-fi, it's simply not possible for an object to disappear, that would break all of the conservation laws. So that question, as asked, is not really valid. I'm reminded of a cartoon with 2 scientists at a chalk b…
/r/MensRights04/06/22 10:44 PM
2

One solution is to get a smaller trash can. We had a medium trash can in the kitchen and it often contained wet items, food items, etc... and in some cases it must have weighed 40 pounds, in which case I carried the bag by the plastic as I was afraid the strings would break. Also when it's that heavy, the side of the bag are tightly pressed to the inside of the trash can, it can take considerable force to gently pull it out.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 10:37 PM
5

Why the trash? It takes 30 seconds to take a 5 lbs bag out and put a new one in lol Actually some are considerably heavier, especially when they contain food items or wet items have been discarded. That being said, up till now I've never had a gf or seen a woman take out the trash, apparently that's a man's job. My wife will take out the trash if necessary, but usually I take care of the bins myself. Now regarding the laundry, I thought I was doing fine, but when she say me doing it she said don…
/r/MensRights04/06/22 10:33 PM
0

Slightly different question - what if the husband's work isn't very physically or mentally demanding, Wow, can you list these occupations for the readers here?
/r/MensRights04/06/22 10:13 PM
2

As it turns out, not so much. Now the police follow them around to arrest their customers and technically they are an accessory to a crime. https://decrimnow.org.uk/open-letter-on-the-nordic-model/ The Nordic Model does not ‘decriminalise’ sex workers In countries that have brought in the Nordic Model, sex workers have not, as is often promised, been ‘decriminalised’. Brothel-keeping – which is defined as two or more people working together – remains a crime, forcing women to work alone or risk …
/r/MensRights04/06/22 10:01 PM
12

The U.S. has several that I know of and I’m sure many more that I’m not aware of. California's bill requiring a certain number of women on corporate boards violates so many laws, it violates both the state and federal constitutions, it violates Ca's own Unruh Civil Right's Act, it violates the 1964 Civil Right's Act, and yet bills like this get passed anyway. WTF is wrong with these people. Luckily this law was ruled unconstitutional, twice. https://www.reuters.com/legal/legalindustry/california…
/r/MensRights04/06/22 09:50 PM
1

Nice dodging. I honestly think if you look at incarceration false accusations false accusations of sexual assualts are such a minor issue. Found the feminist. We barely incarcerate sexual assualts preps that unless you think all of them are false we have bigger issues within justis reform that effect more men. Everyone deserves justice, and jailing innocent men for a crime they did not commit is not, let me be the first to tell you, justice. Why do you think men's rights is so focused on the fal…
/r/MensRights04/06/22 09:33 PM
1

So you don't care at all about any of the issues I posted? Not one word of response?
/r/MensRights03/06/22 11:02 PM
1

Is that what your feathers are ruffled about? Wait, I got feathers? I always thought of myself as a Woody Allen kinda guy, Without Feathers. Man does not live on bread alone, sometimes there must also be a beverage. The guy didn't say women are hurt more, he pointed out that there are pro-women reasons not to block mens rights activists. And that part makes no sense, you don't block email, that's not how it works. And every woman has the exact same rights and privileges whether he's blocked or n…
/r/MensRights03/06/22 10:59 PM
11

Wives used to support their husbands I'm not sure that was the way things happened. They used to support their household and the husband was a slave to that.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 12:16 AM
5

I'd say making her let him mark her ballot is quite abusive and illegal So you're telling me that the election officials at the polling station let that happen right in front of them?
/r/MensRights03/06/22 12:14 AM
3

So everything hurts women more then. NEWSFLASH: World to end tomorrow, women and minorities most affected.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 12:09 AM
4

Abuse is such a vague word. In feminist literature it's abusive if a man raises his voice to his wife in an argument. It's financial abuse if he does not buy her what she wants, even if it's with his own money. In fact, there's no normal behavior that has not been labeled as abusive.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 12:05 AM
3

Even if she doesn't want it ? Asking me to help is a strange way of showing it. Often she has forgotten her reading glasses and can't read the form. But above and beyond that, she just does not like filling out forms, and really, who does?
/r/MensRights03/06/22 12:01 AM
6

Voting for someone else is a criminal offense. It's not clear that this is what happened. And the OP says that what he saw should not be possible. Therefore, it probably did not happen, at least not what he thinks. In the US if someone is unable to sign the ballot themselves, it is legal for a someone to help them and they have to sign their own name. No doubt Canada has some similar provision. And he says he emailed but they did not receive it because he had been blocked on twitter. This makes …
/r/MensRights02/06/22 11:56 PM
3

She also refuses to press charges out of a fear of what my Dad could do once released from prison. Found the feminist. Does he know how you feel about him? That said, if she fears leaving him, there is not much I can do. From what I'm hearing he should leave her. Of course, he will probably lose everything in the process. I once called the police after my Mom told me he'd hit her. She's elderly, isn't particularly internet literate, and struggles with moderate memory problems so I try to help he…
/r/MensRights02/06/22 11:49 PM
6

I help my wife with forms all the time. If it's something I don't know (ex: when was your last period) I ask her. I realize that some feminists style helping your wife as abuse, but it's not.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 11:03 PM
37

Without realizing it, by silencing male victims of abuse, feminist organizations silence the women in these men's lives too. No, she still has a voice, she can give them a call. So is this the first time you've tried to put your dad in jail
/r/MensRights02/06/22 10:57 PM
1

So your thought is that rather then address the system that created these issues. I have no idea what this means. It's not my thought, it's your thought. We should create a system to make it hard for people to report crime? We have such a system now, it's already near impossible for a man to report DV or that he was raped by a woman. And false rape accusations are not a crime against a man, a man falsely accused can't report it to anyone. At best a false rape accusation is a crime against the st…
/r/MensRights02/06/22 10:51 PM
20

It seems to depend, maybe on the issue, for example... Feminists: There's no need for a men's movement because feminism is about equality for everyone. Men: Feminism does not help us. Feminists: It's not supposed to, it's the women's movement, it's about helping women.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 10:37 PM
1

You know, there are a lot of problems with the UK police. But the law in the UK literally makes it safe and profitable for women to make false rape accusations. One woman even made it a business proposition but apparently it was costing the Crown too much so they finally put a stop to it at 15 false accusations. https://archive.ph/Xfum1 TWISTED LIAR CAGED ‘Attention-seeking’ woman cost taxpayers £900,000 after falsely accusing 15 men of rape after lies exposed The UK was very concerned about a l…
/r/MensRights02/06/22 04:07 PM
1

It was true in her area of Pakistan. It wasn't true for all areas of Pakistan. As I recall Pakistan is mostly Muslin and Islam places the entire financial burden of supporting the family on the husband. The woman's money and properties are hers alone, whereas his money and properties are theirs (a lot like coverture). So if class seating is limited (as I imagine it would be) then seating given to girls is seating denied to boys. Also, stats that have been posted here show that there are about as…
/r/MensRights02/06/22 03:46 PM
2

“Stiffed” is probably the most insightful analysis of contemporary masculinity I have ever read. So apparently now you know all about toxic masculinity. And that I have not read a book that I don't have and probably don't want to buy leads you to somehow conclude that my cranium is likely to explode. Amazing. It's also true that mentioning that one book does not show some diversity of feminism or that the majority don't hate men. You know, the text where I said 'show me'? The obvious rejoinder —…
/r/MensRights02/06/22 03:25 PM
1

If she advocates for women and girls only where women and girls are actually disadvantaged, I don't know enough about Pakistan to judge whether this is true or not. Do you? that is still seeking equality. There has never been a sunset clause on this so-called seeking of equality. The advocacy is always for women and girls and often also against men and boys.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 03:20 PM
1

Specifically in areas where women and girls were denied education in her region of Pakistan on the basis of their sex. She is categorically not an advocate for equality and fair play, like all feminists (whether she calls herself a feminist or not) she advocates only for women and girls. That was seeking equality and fair play, I disagree. One observation is that this advocacy never changes, even when women become a majority (always by way of blatant sexist discrimination) there is never a call …
/r/MensRights02/06/22 03:01 PM
112

The Amber Heard-Johnny Depp trial was an orgy of misogyny An orgy of misogyny? Wow. The trial has turned into a public orgy of misogyny. While most of the vitriol is nominally directed at Heard, it is hard to shake the feeling that really, it is directed at all women – and in particular, at those of us who spoke out about gendered abuse and sexual violence during the height of the #MeToo movement. We are in a moment of virulent antifeminist backlash, and the modest gains that were made in that e…
/r/MensRights02/06/22 02:52 PM
1

I’d say people should have a reasonable expectation of privacy while you want to spy on everyone. There is nothing like spying here. And 'everyone' is your insane fantasy.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 02:46 PM
1

You do realize that all these things are available to the DA if they convince the judge they are relevant to the case. In some cases apparently a subpoena issues by a court clerk is sufficient.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 02:40 PM
1

You mean Susan Fauldi, author of Backlash, the undeclared war against American women??? Faludi's 1991 book Backlash: The Undeclared War Against American Women argued that the 1980s saw a backlash against feminism, especially due to the spread of negative stereotypes against career-minded women. Faludi asserted that many who argue "a woman's place is in the home, looking after the kids" are hypocrites, since they have wives who are working mothers or, as women, they are themselves working mothers…
/r/MensRights02/06/22 02:34 PM
1

You don’t know what exculpatory evidence is, apparently. I said help convict the accused, not help the accused. idk, I think that the innocent should be protected and the guilty punished. Clearly you think the accuser should be protected and the accused should be punished, regardless of who is guilty of wrongdoing.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 02:31 PM
1

At age eleven, Malala Yousafzai was already advocating for the rights of women and girls. As an outspoken proponent for girls’ right to education, But she is not an advocate for equality and fair play, she's an advocate exclusively for women and girls.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 02:25 PM
1

We have had civil wars, so there's precedent.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 02:12 PM
1

You must be living in a fairytale world wearing rose colored glasses. For posting a twitter comment demonstrating toxicity?
/r/MensRights02/06/22 02:11 PM
5

Interesting. A jury for the Virginia Circuit civil court contains 5 jurors. For a conviction to be made, all members of the jury must come to a unanimous decision. Otherwise, they will remain in deliberations until such a decision is reached. This is not the case for Civil trials everywhere though.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 11:11 PM
34

Well said Johnny.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 11:08 PM
6

If you are physically abused leave. If they harass you file a restraining order. Johnny should have brought her up on charges when she cut off his finger. As I recall he tried to at one point and says he was laughed out of the police station. It is hard for men to come forward when they are being abused. The VAWA + Duluth model tells police to arrest male DV victims of women. It's not just hard, men stand a better chance of being arrested than anything else.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 11:07 PM
1

Yes and they are not the suspect and should not have a presumption of guilt. They aren't. Why do you feel/think that they should? Why do I think they need to cooperate with the criminal investigation that they themselves started? Why do you think that they should not?
/r/MensRights01/06/22 04:00 PM
7

The comments on the tweet are pretty toxic... It may be the 1st time in the history of time that men are feeling just that first taste of discrimination - a little pinch of reality & they're crying like babies. Buck up guys. You won't understand until you're feeling it.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 03:55 PM
1

The person reporting a crime should not be presumed to have committed a crime. The person reporting a crime is indisputably part of the criminal investigation whether you understand this or not.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 03:40 PM
2

They shouldn't get it from the victims phone itself. That's terribly unreliable and unprofessional. Tell that to Liam Allen. https://www.thejusticegap.com/liam-allan-warns-of-disclosure-failures-over-plans-to-give-rape-victims-right-to-refuse-to-hand-over-phones-to-police/ Liam Allan warns of disclosure failures over plans to give rape victims right to refuse to hand over phones to police A man wrongly accused of rape has spoken out about ‘knee jerk’ plans under the policing bill enabling rape v…
/r/MensRights01/06/22 03:33 PM
5

Strawman definition is spot on, here. Not at all, I am not misrepresenting your arguments with the intention of knocking them down, no arguments are being discussed here. I am simply posting my observations of the way you post. The obvious rejoinder — as I set out in my initial statement — is that their are a diversity of feminisms and not all of them (probably not even the majority of them) hate men. OK, I'm from Kansas (figuratively speaking), show me. Here’s the big issue people like you can’…
/r/MensRights01/06/22 03:31 PM
2

Okay, so what’s your solution? Everything possible is done to get woman to make accusations, true or false. The accuser is kept anonymous, even if the accusation is proven false, they pay so-called victim compensation, which also does not have to be repaid if the accusations are proven false. This leads to a business case for making false rape accusations. One enterprising woman made 15 false rape accusations before the Crown decided it was costing too much. https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/8741509…
/r/MensRights01/06/22 03:24 PM
1

The police have a duty to investigate any crime that is reported to them. The data on the phone, such as location data can either corroborate the accusation or deny the validity of the accusation, in either case, it's part of investigating the crime.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 02:53 PM
2

If it is simply the accuser not wanting to give up their phone in order to help convict the accused, then that’s fine. So you think the accuser withholding exculpatory evidence is "fine"?
/r/MensRights01/06/22 02:07 PM
5

It's just an observation. And you need to learn what a straw man is.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 02:05 PM
2

i mean, they aren't, but what will you do? For a start, stop lying about them.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 05:27 AM
3

The subject here is feminists. Name these feminists who,,, seek equality and fair play
/r/MensRights01/06/22 05:25 AM
6

Rather, you don't see any form of man-hating so extreme that you would object to it. You only object to men defending themselves.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 05:23 AM
6

I'm just responding to your comments. And you seem quite opposed to the accused's case being properly investigated.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 01:03 AM
11

But if the accuser doesn’t want to give up their phone to prove their case, then they’re just screwing themselves. No, they are screwing the man falsely accused. The man who might be cleared by the evidence on the phone may well be prosecuted and given a prison sentence. He certainly won't be cleared. You seem OK with this. But in this kind of situation, the accuser would be the accused. Whut?
/r/MensRights01/06/22 01:01 AM
6

That happens already either way, by being accused. A lack of evidence only helps them. No, it makes it look like they were guilty and got away with it.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 12:58 AM
6

That they are the potential victim of a crime not the suspect and therefore shouldn't be treated as a suspect. If it's a false rape accusation then the man falsely accused is the victim. And would you believe it, it would be in her best interests as a false accuser to withhold exculpatory evidence.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 12:54 AM
61

https://www.thejusticegap.com/liam-allan-warns-of-disclosure-failures-over-plans-to-give-rape-victims-right-to-refuse-to-hand-over-phones-to-police/ Liam Allan warns of disclosure failures over plans to give rape victims right to refuse to hand over phones to police A man wrongly accused of rape has spoken out about ‘knee jerk’ plans under the policing bill enabling rape victims to have a legal right to refuse to hand over phones to police. The Daily Telegraph recently reported that Priti Patel,…
/r/MensRights01/06/22 12:51 AM
9

The charges can just be dropped by the prosecutor if the alleged victim doesn’t want to provide information. The damage to the accused is already done, his name is out there as a rapist and he may well lose employment, friends, family and his home. Apparently that's a price you are willing to pay.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 12:48 AM
15

Okay, alleged victims shouldn’t have to turn over their phones then. The word you are looking for is accusers. And so what if the information on the phone proves that the accused is innocent, you're apparently quite willing to let an innocent man rot in prison.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 12:46 AM
9

but then the accused will just have less evidence against them That's not the problem, the problem is that the information on the phone could lead to the case collapsing, just ask Liam Allen.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 12:44 AM
10

And no, I don't think the 'no true Scotsman' fallacy applies because support for equality is part of the definition of feminism. Feminism is a movement, not a word. Fight gender neutral rape laws Nobody who opposes gender neutral rape laws is a feminist. Yep, no true feminist.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 12:33 AM
7

There's those that seek equality and fair play. You mean feminists? Name them, show me.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 12:26 AM
12

Feminists don't tend to view men MRAs positively, FTFY.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 12:23 AM
17

I'm a feminist, and while I believe women on average still have it worse Have what worse? Why do so many of you see feminists as your opponents? I think this calls for Karen Straughan's 'no true feminist' post, which is a very short list of some of what feminism has done very recently (and no doubt will make you proud)... The following is a very informed and highly reusable comment by Karen Straughan in response to a feminist who thinks the many blatant sexists among feminists aren't real femini…
/r/MensRights01/06/22 12:16 AM
2

Found the feminist.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 01:52 PM
2

'Oppression' is communist currency. You speak like a Marxist.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 01:50 PM
2

I feel like the MRM straight up ignores issues facing Gay and Trans Men (like we're more likely than other LGBT People to experience hate crimes, Concern Troll 101, the MRM should be doing something else. Both the gay and trans lobbies are much more powerful than the MRM. If they treated gay and trans issues as men's issues they could accomplish something, but neither are interested in men's issues per se.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 01:47 PM
6

many of the frustrations expressed here seem to be in response to feminism without acknowledging why feminism exists in the first place We know why feminism exists, hatred of men. You seem to be a feminist yourself.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 01:43 PM
1

I think the MRM undervalues the role women play in undermining feminism and giving a voice to the plight of men. Hey, we love the Honey Badgers. I wish they had company.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 01:40 PM
2

That it's men against the whole world, that it's all or nothing. You have it the wrong way round. What does 'all or nothing' even mean in this context? As I said, a finely crafted concern troll.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 01:38 PM
0

So you've decided that Marxism is the way forward.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 05:29 AM
7

A finely crafted 'concern troll'. The fundamental blocker for the MRM is that it deals with men's issues, that's not allowed, that's it 100%.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 05:16 AM
25

Yeah, but their inability to identify the 'up' escalator is who's fault?
/r/MensRights30/05/22 05:14 AM
-4

He said that... I think the recommendation for how to treat a man should be used for both men and women. What he seems to have meant was that,,, I think the recommendation for how to treat a woman should be used for both men and women.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 05:11 AM
2

Good points about confirmation bias, but what I feel the author dies the acknowledge well is that the goal of feminism is to advantage women and disadvantage men. My long term observation is that feminism is more about harming men than helping women. For example, they amended Title IX such that there had to be as many women's sports teams as men's. This did not help women, all the women interested in sports were already on some women's teams. What it did was to eliminate untold thousand of men's…
/r/MensRights29/05/22 10:56 PM
5

It's not really necessary that he knows about MRAs. He's done more to raise awareness of male DV victims of women than the entire MRM over the last 40 years. And it's unintentional, but that does not matter either.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 10:49 PM
3

Maybe, but movie stars get more than the allotted 15 minutes of fame.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 10:46 PM
13

The only was one court case could massively change everything is if it was a Supreme Court case, and this is a Civil issue. On the other hand, as many are pointing out, it has made many people aware that men can and are abused by women, feminism and the media had pretty much kept most people ignorant that this can and does happen.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 10:45 PM
8

Don't. Good advice, but the problem is you probably don't know in advance.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 10:41 PM
5

I think the recommendation for how to treat a man should be used for both men and women. Especially leave at the first sign of physical abuse. That's part of the advice for women.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 10:41 PM
11

The YWCA was created for women but it serves men. Don’t make me repeat myself Repeating yourself proves nothing.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 09:19 PM
4

Stop being lazy and call your local YWCA. It's your claim, either you provide some evidence that it's true or you don't. It looks like it's a don't in this case.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 09:18 PM
6

You can’t publicly name victims of domestic violence without violating their privacy. Newspapers and web pages do it all the time. Exactly which privacy laws are you referring to? Apparently you can't demonstrate that the ymca helps male victims.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 08:36 PM
5

You can’t publicly name victims of domestic violence without violating their privacy. What are you talking about? Male victims get named all the time, female abusers or rapists, not so often. I'll name one male DV victim to get you started, Johnny Depp. But either you support your claim, or you don't. And apparently you cannot.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 07:55 PM
9

Yes it does. I know for a fact that many of these DV agencies serve men. Then document this fact. Name one male DV victim that has been helped by the YWCA. It’s not an assumption. It's an unsupported claim made by yourself.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 07:27 PM
14

Check out the YWCA Document one man that was helped by the YWCA. Theoretically the VAWA serves men too, but in practice it does not. NCFM launched a lawsuit against the California network of women's domestic violence shelters, alleging (correctly) that they were in violation of state equal protection laws and should have their government funding eliminated if they continued to discriminate. Through the entire lawsuit, NCFM repeatedly offered a settlement: provide men with the same off-campus ser…
/r/MensRights29/05/22 07:13 PM
7

Domestic Violence agencies now serve men Source?
/r/MensRights29/05/22 06:52 PM
6

WASHINGTON / December 17, 2020 – A recent national survey conducted by YouGov reveals 8% of Americans report being falsely accused of domestic violence, child abuse, sexual assault, or other forms of abuse. The 2,407 survey respondents were representative of the U.S. adult population. The 8% figure represents 20.4 million adults. In 62% of cases, the false accusers were reported to be females. Often, the false allegation was made in the context of a child custody dispute — 27% of cases. Wait, th…
/r/MensRights29/05/22 02:19 PM
5

Low effort post, not related to men's rights. Also breaks rule 9, advocating for violence. Reported. Trolls gotta troll I guess.
/r/MensRights28/05/22 10:00 PM
34

Of course viewers will form opinions based on such evidence. That's the jury's job as well. The only difference is that the jury is not supposed to have any other influences like TV news and blog posts.
/r/MensRights28/05/22 09:12 PM
-9

Women are the biggest enemy of feminism, change my mind I'd rather see you prove it. About the only women you'll hear object to feminism are the Honey Badgers.
/r/MensRights28/05/22 09:09 PM
59

Feminism is what makes feminism look bad.
/r/MensRights28/05/22 09:08 PM
77

At first I thought Depp did a great job portraying a drunk pirate. Then I learned that he was not acting, he was drunk on the set. Now I know why he was drunk on the set and it's more understandable.
/r/MensRights28/05/22 09:08 PM
5

Where is this feminist who believes in equal rights? It's not the author of this article. Heard’s every gesture has been analyzed and scrutinized. Depp’s odd behavior? Not so much. The actor smiled, grinned and snacked on candy throughout the trial. Depp is either an abuser, or a victim of abuse. But his body language throughout this excruciating ordeal has remained casual, even cheerful. It would be hard to imagine Heard getting away with similar (even seeming) nonchalance. Ultimately the jury …
/r/MensRights28/05/22 09:06 PM
10

men are people too I posted that once on some feminist sub by accident, I had been reading a thread and left the tab open and when I came back later forgot which sub it was. The comment was deleted, but I did not receive a ban notice. But the post was rather old at that point and I guess no one was paying much attention.
/r/MensRights28/05/22 03:48 AM
17

Worst patriarchy ever!
/r/MensRights28/05/22 02:52 AM
1

I am here bc I dont believe theres any better source than primary, and I want to hear what you all have to say. Active and persistent disagreement gives a different message.
/r/MensRights28/05/22 02:47 AM
1

Lets assume my definition is bullshit. Im open to that. Whats your definitely? Since we don't live in a Patriarchy, the exact details are irrelevant. I didnt say that at all? Men made the rule bc 'chivalry' to 'protect women [and children]', as you said Your text looked very sarcastic, and I responded appropriately.
/r/MensRights28/05/22 02:44 AM
1

The common meaning is bullshit, I dont think we have to adopt new definitions for shit until is shown to be evident. Since you said the same thing, I guess your definition is bullshit too. Men wrote the rules to protect women. Which is exactly why men created 'women and children first', right? You think 'women and children first' protects men? How amusing.
/r/MensRights28/05/22 02:34 AM
1

Thats what I am here doing. It's not clear what you are doing here. But whatever it is you're not arguing for or supporting men's rights.
/r/MensRights28/05/22 02:33 AM
1

I am describing human psychology! Bias affects us all, You're describing your own bias. It takes alot to 'walk in someone's elses shoes' so to speak. Maybe you should give it a try.
/r/MensRights28/05/22 02:20 AM
1

I never mentioned patriarchal theory? That's what the common meaning is today. We certainly don't live in a patriarchy. Men wrote the rules, in most societies. To protect the women. This lead to a early system that prioritized rich men formost. Please document this. Actually, you are close, this is accurate... This lead to a early system that prioritized rich women formost. Rich men got no breaks on the Titanic.
/r/MensRights28/05/22 02:19 AM
1

I am not anti-male, and I dont think patriarchy is an anti-male word either. Patriarchy Theory: All men oppress women for men's benefit. I disagree. its the order of our society that naturally arose due to mens physical superiority. So then you claim you are oppressed by men and the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights28/05/22 02:01 AM
1

He asked what patriarchy is. Today what is meant by that word is feminist Patriarchy Theory. Patriarchy Theory: All men oppress women for men's benefit. But then, you said about the same thing... Patriarchy describes how culture, law, and traditions that still hold influence were written and designed by men, and intentionally or not, for men. When I asked you about it you accused me of arguing in bad faith and stereotyping, when in fact your claim is a stereotype.
/r/MensRights28/05/22 01:59 AM
1

But instead of trying to understand how or why i came to that conclusion I've asked you repeatedly where your claims that marriage was slavery and your other claims came from. But instead of trying to understand how or why i came to that conclusion, you make assumptions based on stereotypes. You should not use words you don't understand. Your claim that marriage is slavery is not a stereotype, neither is the same claim made by feminists. You seem stuck in your mental box, unable to wvwn engage w…
/r/MensRights28/05/22 01:44 AM
1

Not a stereotype You really should look that word up.
/r/MensRights28/05/22 01:32 AM
1

Please dont out words or opinions in my mouth. I did neither, I stated my observations. Respond to what I said What a sweet little hypocrite, you not once responded to my words. But I have responded to your words. You say marriage is slavery... I think is wasnt slavery by definition, but in all practical ways it often was Feminism says marriage is slavery... Since marriage constitutes slavery for women, it is clear that the women’s movement must concentrate on attacking this institution. Freedom…
/r/MensRights28/05/22 01:31 AM
8

A male student who the University of Denver expelled for sexual misconduct may sue the school for its alleged failure to conduct a fair and impartial investigation, the state's second-highest court ruled on Thursday. "John Doe," as the student is identified in court documents, claimed that DU investigators refused to interview his witnesses, did not question his accuser's motivations and overlooked inconsistencies in the alleged victim's statements. Because the university's procedures at the tim…
/r/MensRights28/05/22 01:25 AM
1

So you don't actually have any source for your claims. I'm asking you where this stuff came from. You don't know. An obvious source if feminism. Since marriage constitutes slavery for women, it is clear that the women’s movement must concentrate on attacking this institution. Freedom for women cannot be won without the abolition of marriage. Sheila Cronin, the leader of the feminist organization NOW The nuclear family must be destroyed… Whatever its ultimate meaning, the break-up of families now…
/r/MensRights28/05/22 01:20 AM
1

Yes, very smart man. I am idiot who knows nothing. So where did you learn that men have been evil for all of history and that marriage is slavery?
/r/MensRights28/05/22 12:45 AM
1

Interestinf how dowry is a common term but Ive never heard of bride price! Dowry is not a common term, except maybe in your feminist studies classes. It's not a thing in the west. I think is wasnt slavery by definition, but in all practical ways it often was So you claim marriage is slavery? I can observe that you know nothing about either. If you want to see indentured servitude look at the situation of just about any divorced man in the US.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 11:50 PM
1

I have, it's not relevant as what you are claiming is slavery. BTW, different countries have different customs, there's dowry and there's bride price. They are different. What is the difference between a dowry and a bride price? These payments can be categorized into two: dowry and bride price. The dowry, more common in Asian countries, involves payments made by the bride to the groom and his family. Bride price, on the other hand, refers to the payments that a prospective groom and his family m…
/r/MensRights27/05/22 10:55 PM
1

What's the deception? Very funny. But even if there was one you'd still lack criminal intent. The CPS apparently disagreed. I'm not even sure to what extent Mens Rea plays a part in British law. But unless you're saying that the culprit accidentally tried to make herself look like a man then deceive 3 women that she was a man, I think we have sufficient evidence of intent. Since this has gone off the rails and you can't seem to understand the simplest things, I'm done with this, you can have the…
/r/MensRights27/05/22 10:49 PM
6

I'm reminded of 2 things... https://archive.ph/v8Luo Fashion boss 'attacked and kicked' on Tube condemns two men who walked away and left her to defend herself A fashion chief executive who claims she was verbally and physically assaulted on the Tube has condemned two male passengers for not coming to her aid. Tamara Cincik, Founder & CEO of consultancy company Fashion Roundtable, said she was attacked by an "unwell" man as she travelled from her home in Highgate to a business meeting in Old Str…
/r/MensRights27/05/22 09:41 PM
1

Hey there Fearless-Capital-396! If you agree with someone else's comment, please leave an upvote instead of commenting "THIS." Maybe they did that too? These are not mutually exclusive options.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 08:14 PM
1

Marital or spousal rape wasnt illegal nationwide until 1993, and there are still states that treat it as a lesser crime than nonmarital rape. Marriage has up till recently been an institution where the spouses had a duty to provide sex to the other on demand unless it was illegal (ex: in public). https://www.medievalists.net/2021/02/medieval-marital-sex/ If either spouse was incapable of intercourse the marriage could be dissolved. Impotence (masculine and feminine) a physical impairment renderi…
/r/MensRights27/05/22 08:05 PM
1

I tried to verify the first example... First Western Weddings in Ancient Greece and Rome Western marriage traditions date back to Ancient Greece and Rome, where marriage was much more of a legal contract than a romantic endeavor. Instead of taking place between a man and woman, the marriage was actually a contract between two men: the groom and the bride's father. Women had no choice about whether they would marry or who would become their husband, and they may not even have laid eyes on the gro…
/r/MensRights27/05/22 07:20 PM
2

There is no "HE" in this equation. I know, but I just don't care anymore, in these discussions they make no difference other than identifying who you are talking about. It has nothing to do with men. In the other case I posted about, the woman who met a similar fate at the hand of her female 'friend' had one take-away, not to trust men. She is not the sharpest tool in the shed.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 06:48 PM
1

It is not bullshit that he was convicted for 8 acts of violence. It is not bullshit that these acts of violence are a crime. He committed crimes even if you ignore the 'assault by penetration' convictions. I'm amazed that you can't understand this. But this is reddit.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 06:45 PM
8

... Do women have a moral compass is their being? You think women are a different species than men? Feminism does. And women have gone through 'dna deletion', what a weird way to say natural selection or sexual selection, just the same as men. Everything has not been equal between men and women on the reproductive front, figures vary by time and place, but often sometimes a majority of men were not able to reproduce... https://psmag.com/environment/17-to-1-reproductive-success 8,000 Years Ago, 1…
/r/MensRights27/05/22 06:38 PM
10

So we agree, women who harmed men have been killed in the past? idk, self defense has always been a valid excuse for a killing. feminism even claims that you can kill a sleeping man in self-defense. All im saying is women were not immune from the effects of poverty, famine, or pestilence. Where women are impoverished, so are men, equally. I'm not sure what this has to do with anything. But if it makes you feel better, the UN has decided to give food aid only to women, so men in those areas are m…
/r/MensRights27/05/22 06:25 PM
11

That's a problem, because more and more, we stop sepparsting a movement's core ideals from its recent toxic following. Feminism has always been about hating men, even more than it's about helping women.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 02:34 PM
12

If feminists aim is to have a world where men and women are equal Don't mistake the PR for the feminist product, which is discrimination against men and boys.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 02:33 PM
3

You do realize Im not talking about the last 100-150 yrs? Im talking the foundations of our society, which certainly has roots in older customs? You are making more vague claims. I'm asking you to back said claims. Patriarchy describes how culture, law, and traditions that still hold influence were written and designed by men, and intentionally or not, for men. You claim that the laws were written by men for the benefit of men, so you should be able to document this.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 02:06 PM
-1

So: If it was a real cock, it was consensual sex -- but since it was a surprise dildo that makes it "assault"? You can't read. You ask what the crime was. The crime was assault. He was convicted of six instances of assault that caused bodily injury. The situation was not as you paint it where everyone was happy.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 01:48 PM
1

Well if they want it to be fraud then yes they must actually lie at some point and not merely rely on nobody bothering to ask. I don't think it's as simple as that. If they've gone to an extreme effort to be, the word they use is 'passing' as the other sex, they dress like the other sex, they take hormones predominate in the other sex, they have surgery to look like the other sex, they take lessons to act like the other sex, then they are guilty of an active deception.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 01:45 PM
2

I only looked at the postings and comments.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 01:36 PM
4

I beileve in early human days yes, but there was obviously a large timeperiod where women were essentially objects to be bought or sold by their fathers to future husbands. Source?
/r/MensRights26/05/22 10:46 PM
7

The people in power have the biggest influence on how a society is shaped. Even kings had to follow chivalry. Thats why religous groups have had such a huge influence, they had power. In the US there was always a separation of church and state, they had no overt power and no ability to write laws. And marriage gave men a lot of responsibilities but no actual power. The reason I mention the massive changes in recent history is the only reason laws no longer exclude or discriminate against women T…
/r/MensRights26/05/22 10:43 PM
2

He was convicted of three counts of assault by penetration and six counts of assault occasioning actual bodily harm. He also was convicted of making a threat after a trial. I'm not sure how good a time you can have when assaulted.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 10:37 PM
1

only 2 sexes genders male or female by birth nothing else ffs. FTFY. And meiosis is not perfect, sometimes there are genetic accidents that don't spontaneously abort, these are called 'intersex' but they are not different sexes. They may be XXY or XYY or a male may have androgen insensitivity and look like a girl (but does not have the genes for female reproductive organs). It's not their fault, but they are not normal males or females either.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 10:31 PM
2

Not that I know of. There is an MRA sub, but it appears to be about magnetic resonance imaging. I did see at least one post in againstMR calling for the banning of this sub.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 10:17 PM
5

Denying the gender of trans people is transphobic. What does 'trans' mean again?
/r/MensRights26/05/22 10:08 PM
14

You gave the feminist response. Patriarchy describes how culture, law, and traditions that still hold influence were written and designed by men, and intentionally or not, for men. Show me which laws, customs and traditions favor men. And no one writes traditions and customs, they develop over time.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 09:46 PM
12

Found the feminist.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 09:33 PM
8

What is patriarchy anyway? In what ways are women oppressed in western civilization? Feminist Patriarchy Theory: All men oppress women for men's benefit. It's Marxism lite.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 09:30 PM
3

And I'm willing to bet you believe this. And since there is no substance left, I'm out, you can have the last rant.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 09:24 PM
10

Well, it is trashy so it's in the right sub.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 08:19 PM
19

The one's I'd be suspect of are Affirmative Action hires, like women appointed to corporate boards to meet a quota. They don't have to be able to do the job, they just have to fill a quota position. California's law has been struck down, but let's see if it survives on appeal or makes it to the SC.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 08:19 PM
4

I'm not angry, you seem to like making stuff up yourself. But stating your opinion labeled as such is not a problem. You can disagree, but unless you claim they lied about their opinion it remains correct as stated.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 08:13 PM
3

But does that make him a rapist? The charge was 'sexual assault by penetration', not rape.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 08:03 PM
1

Do I recognize a Benny Hill joke?
/r/MensRights26/05/22 08:00 PM
3

“I’m willing to bet…” Actually it's a personal opinion stated as such. Would the CPS put a trans-woman on trial for deceiving a man? idk. But it obviously could not be for the same offense of 'sexual assault by penetration'. And what if the trans-woman claimed that the man raped her? My observation is that the CPS does not care about sexual crimes, unless against a woman.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 07:57 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter