tessarect Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	IBM sues Microsoft’s new chief diversity officer over non-compete agreement - involves gender quota filling 'secrets', etc. Remembering Intel which spent hundreds of millions on diversity only to get meltdown, spectre and what not. Then The two have nothing to do with each other. YOU: Care to explain how hiring employees who aren't the best in their fields that you can hire isn't related to critical design issues? You realize that context matters? In the context of this thread, your post indicates that you agree with OP, who clearly stated that hiring practices lead to Spectre.	/r/MensRights	21/02/18 06:29 PM
-1	IBM sues Microsoft’s new chief diversity officer over non-compete agreement - involves gender quota filling 'secrets', etc. As I said, retract your statement if you wish but don't pretend that you didn't argue that hiring practices caused spectre (intentionally or not)	/r/MensRights	21/02/18 06:21 PM
-1	IBM sues Microsoft’s new chief diversity officer over non-compete agreement - involves gender quota filling 'secrets', etc. I edited my post to be more clear	/r/MensRights	21/02/18 06:13 PM
0	IBM sues Microsoft’s new chief diversity officer over non-compete agreement - involves gender quota filling 'secrets', etc. Technically OP originally made the argument but you clearly agreed with it: Remembering Intel which spent hundreds of millions on diversity only to get meltdown, spectre and what not. Then The two have nothing to do with each other. YOU: Care to explain how hiring employees who aren't the best in their fields that you can hire isn't related to critical design issues? Retract your statements if you wish but don't pretend you didn't argue that hiring practices caused Spectre	/r/MensRights	21/02/18 06:05 PM
4	IBM sues Microsoft’s new chief diversity officer over non-compete agreement - involves gender quota filling 'secrets', etc. You don't have any evidence that it did. You're making the positive claim, the burden of proof is on you. The said, intel has stated that processors that were created from 1995 onwards may be susceptible to spectre and meltdown. The hiring quotas that we see today didn't exist in 1995 so it's quite safe to say that hiring quotas weren't responsible for the design flaws that led to spectre and meltdown.	/r/MensRights	21/02/18 05:27 PM
1	Article in Italian. Recent changes in law mean Men are no longer required to pay alimony to maintain an exwife's style of life. Berlusconi wins lawsuit against exeife and she must return 60 million Euros that he pid her in alimony because she is self-sufficient With alimony: Men: "I have to stay married if I don't want to pay alimony" Without alimony: Women: "I have to stay married if I want to maintain this lifestyle" Either way, one gender is discouraged from seeking a divorce. This has nothing to do with familial stability and everything to do with gynocentrism.	/r/MensRights	16/11/17 06:07 PM
12	Reddit admins admit that users at 2XC used sock-puppet accounts to make things look worse than they seemed and lied about harassment via PM. The word 'admit' in your title is somewhat misleading: it implies that Reddit admins have been denying the issue in the first place. I might be mistaken, but this doesn't seem to be the case.	/r/MensRights	20/08/14 05:00 PM
0	JB killed this one, come drink the ambrosia of feminist tears. I'm disappointed it wasn't Jack Black	/r/MensRights	28/07/14 03:58 PM