TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

texaspsychosis Archive

View 1 post and 16 comments by texaspsychosis on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
29

texaspsychosis/r/MensRights05/06/10 07:54 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-2

Lets start with Jessica Valenti, a very well known blogger (feministing.com) and writer who often writes and speaks for men's rights. Her views stress the importance of equality in all areas may it be gender or sexuality. You can also expand that viewpoint to her staff of over a dozen. As for different aspects of feminism there is pro-feminism (very heavy on mens rights/equality), post-modern feminism, socialist feminism, anti-pornography feminism, lesbian feminism, libertarian feminism, black f…
/r/MensRights24/01/11 08:13 PM
1

Didn't generalize the ideology, but rather the actions of a group of people who may believe in several different aspects and degrees of feminism. If we look at the Merriam-Webster definition: Definition of FEMINISM : the theory of the political, economic, and social equality of the sexes Most modern feminists who actually are in the forefront of this political ideology are very pro mens rights.
/r/MensRights24/01/11 07:37 PM
1

Haha! <3
/r/MensRights24/01/11 06:57 PM
-3

Down-voted your generalization. Up-voted the post.
/r/MensRights24/01/11 03:40 PM
3

Perhaps men are more outspoken. Though that might have a correlation to one's commitment to that view point. Well, here is one woman who is outspoken in saying that protecting women over men in the military is archaic and unnecessary. ;)
/r/MensRights23/01/11 08:00 PM
5

I think men and women should serve equally in the military. Both in terms of combat situations, and the draft. Though every time I have this conversation IRL, the only opponents to this position have been men. Perhaps because of a more conservative climate in Texas. Thoughts?
/r/MensRights23/01/11 06:27 PM
1

Not yet. Working on it though. I knew circumcision was unnecessary, but the graphic-ness of it is, something I (silly) didn't expect. Edit: Think I have been forever traumatized by the unanesthetized video.
/r/MensRights18/01/11 03:17 AM
2

Oh my God! Just saw the pictures of a circumcision from this link. People are upset about female genital mutilation*... and meanwhile, do this to their kids? This is sick! *(Which, granted, is also horrible and causes serious medical issues)
/r/MensRights18/01/11 03:09 AM
1

In the case of R v Woods [1981], the accused pleaded that he was so drunk that he had not realised that his victim had not provided consent. Section 1(2) of the Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act 1976 states that if a jury has to consider whether a man believed that a victim was consenting to sexual intercourse, it must have regard to the presence or absence of reasonable grounds for such a belief, in conjunction with any other relevant matters. The Court of Appeal held that intoxication was not a …
/r/MensRights18/01/11 03:03 AM
29

I am a woman that reads this Sub-Reddit. I think Mens' Rights issues are intriguing and important. However, just like some posts on Feminism (equal amounts on both sides, I would say), some posts are in my opinion range from not worthwhile to downright offensive. Thus I down vote on occasion. But do I have a agenda to down vote the entire Sub-Reddit? No! Gosh, I hope people aren't doing that. :-\
/r/MensRights02/01/11 01:29 AM
1

The only people I have personally ever heard raise concerns about this, are men. One argument I heard once was that he feared he would not be able to help himself, and would put his life in danger if a woman was captured. I, as a woman, am fine with having women sign up for selective service.
/r/MensRights16/12/10 02:47 AM
4

I am a woman, and that was the first thing I thought of as well when I saw that thread.
/r/MensRights07/09/10 02:04 PM
7

http://www.fathermag.com/news/rape/spokane.shtml http://blogs.app.com/saywhat/2009/06/19/woman-on-trial-for-raping-10-men/ http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/4067214.cms That was page one of my first google search.
/r/MensRights05/06/10 09:53 PM
13

If you say "No" it is rape. If you are unable to give consent because you are under the influence of drugs, or alcohol, it is rape. True, most rapes of men are from other men. But it still happens. There is still emotional, and physical damage. Saying it is not possible is invalidating thousands of men who have been raped by women.
/r/MensRights05/06/10 09:19 PM
17

Also there are drugs that can be forced on a man that make him erect.
/r/MensRights05/06/10 09:09 PM
22

In this case, sodomy did happen. However, just because you have a physical reaction, does not mean you gave consent. Women can still get wet and have orgasms during rape. It is a physiological response, and does not at all give rights to another person to your body.
/r/MensRights05/06/10 09:06 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter