TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

thalos3D Archive

View 9 posts and 103 comments by thalos3D on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

There are still plenty of people who believe that women never lie. Obviously, the vast majority of these people have never dated.
/r/MensRights29/10/19 10:40 PM
7

It's a way of avoiding debating us on the actual issues.
/r/MensRights12/04/19 02:35 PM
6

/r/jordanpeterson
/r/MensRights14/03/19 03:49 PM
7

The implication is that masculinity is toxic. It isn't, but it's absence can be toxic.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 05:58 PM
3

The feminists had won all their legitimate points by the 70's. So what to do? Pack up and live their lives? No way! Make up new issues and keep the fundraising and political influence party going!
/r/MensRights01/01/19 05:20 PM
6

There is actually a really good reason why men don't cry. When the shit hits the fan, someone needs to deal with it. Men are that someone. Crying can come later. If you want to.
/r/MensRights25/12/18 02:36 PM
25

There is an error in point #2. Ford identified 5 people who might be witnesses, including herself. 4 of those people have stated under oath that nothing happened. Only Ford claims otherwise, and only Ford has refused to speak under oath.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 08:18 PM
2

Disagree. By the 1970's, feminists had already won all the real battles. Did they declare victory and disband? Of course not! Just keep coming up with new grievances forever. Keep the gravy train rolling.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 03:06 PM
8

This is a problem that feminists will never be able to fix. On the one hand, they want to be treated like equals, adults. On the other they insist on not being responsible for their own decisions, on being shielded like children.
/r/MensRights29/07/18 04:56 PM
3

This isn't an example of political correctness gone mad. It's an example of political correctness working exactly the way it is intended to.
/r/MensRights25/06/18 05:21 PM
7

Alimony is used as a retirement program for women. Child support winds up being the same thing too, as she is free to use the money for anything she likes. There are no legal consequences for not spending a dime of it on the kids.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 12:24 AM
2

The Uber study should have put this nonsense to bed forever.
/r/MensRights06/04/18 08:37 PM
1

Men don't read Cosmo. It's for the ladies. Which means that Walmart is blaming men for the way ladies treat each other. Feminism in a nutshell.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 04:12 PM
15

Damore is no conservative. White males is enough (two protected classes), and I suspect that is the subject of his suit. Edit: I stand corrected. His is claiming discrimination against conservatives too. https://www.scribd.com/document/368700776/James-Damore-v-Google-Class-Action-Complaint#from_embed
/r/MensRights08/01/18 10:47 PM
20

If it weren't for double standards, they wouldn't have any standards at all.
/r/MensRights28/10/17 06:39 PM
3

New headline: The Aussie Cafe that went out of business by Intentionally Alienating Half the Population
/r/MensRights05/08/17 02:29 PM
9

Exact same reasoning as the idea that only white people can be racists -- and just as vile.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 07:03 PM
23

The courts view marriage as a retirement program for women. This needs to end.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 02:50 PM
7

One take away - women have more choices than men, and when they choose rationally, they find that they have better options than working themselves to death 80 hours a week for a little more money.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 05:08 PM
3

What happened to my body, my choice?
/r/MensRights06/03/17 04:09 PM
2

Every fascist needs a whipping boy - someone to blame for everything wrong in the world. Extreme feminist fascists are no different.
/r/MensRights17/01/17 09:27 PM
8

This is how the system is supposed to work. If you get public funding, then you have to answer to the people who are paying your bills.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 11:24 PM
1

They should lock her up and give her the care she so desperately needs.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 02:23 AM
3

Just an excuse to throw public money at feminist advocacy groups.
/r/MensRights29/11/16 09:55 PM
3

This sort of thing makes it very difficult for feminists to respond to criticism that they are completely humorless.
/r/MensRights22/11/16 05:23 PM
6

When feminists came out in support of Bill Clinton after his frolics with a 21 year old whitehouse intern, they permanently destroyed their credibility, because they made it obvious that feminism isn't about women, it's about left-wing politics.
/r/MensRights14/11/16 06:41 PM
3

Given how feminists view men, is there any other rationale choice? Why would any normal person associate with someone who thinks they are the root of all evil?
/r/MensRights14/10/16 03:24 PM
4

Talk about high maintenance.
/r/MensRights06/09/16 10:48 PM
3

Saul Alinsky smiles.
/r/MensRights04/09/16 03:50 PM
2

Sounds like it is the men who are getting 'raped.'
/r/MensRights01/09/16 02:40 PM
0

Seems to be a real thing in Europe right now. In the US not so much.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 07:33 PM
2

This is a counter-intuitive result. In the US the Democrats would not have won a single modern presidential race without the female vote - especially the single mom vote.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 02:11 PM
4

Part of the process of turning women into children. Kids can't consent. Drunk women can't consent. At some point when sex becomes rape because she regrets it later, you are saying that she didn't / couldn't consent.
/r/MensRights09/08/16 08:06 PM
1

Sorry. I did not realize you were the judge in this case. For the rest of us, we will see.
/r/MensRights03/08/16 04:16 PM
1

Well, you are right on one point. The entire case will be about whether or not plaintiff is a public figure, in which case the standard is actual malice. This is why these cases are rare and almost impossible to win, though it does happen.
/r/MensRights03/08/16 03:35 PM
0

Oh Noes! You found a link! OMG. It's the internetz! Ok. Now go read New York Times vs Sullivan.
/r/MensRights01/08/16 09:22 PM
2

Don't get your hopes up. The threshold for liability in this kind of case is really high. You have to prove actual malice.
/r/MensRights31/07/16 11:23 PM
2

Feminism = punishment of men for things women do to each other.
/r/MensRights08/07/16 04:45 PM
2

Single moms tend to vote Democrat. Do the math.
/r/MensRights30/06/16 06:18 PM
3

Protecting the rights of the accused? Fairness? Due process? No way universities will support this.
/r/MensRights29/06/16 02:07 PM
57

Because women are being infantilized. They can't make decisions for themselves and can't be held responsible for their actions. Remember, it always makes sense when you keep in mind that feminists don't like women.
/r/MensRights20/05/16 06:43 PM
8

Seems like we are going backwards. What next? Separate drinking fountains?
/r/MensRights07/05/16 12:46 PM
0

Truly, you are a master of the art of persuasion.
/r/MensRights01/05/16 03:57 PM
0

It wasn't clear you were referring to her comments, and not feminists in general.
/r/MensRights01/05/16 03:12 PM
4

Why do you assume that their intentions are good?
/r/MensRights01/05/16 03:07 PM
9

Feminists haven't rejected the patriarchy. They have just replaced men with the government, with the demand that the government take care of them like a husband would have.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 07:09 PM
1

Anyone who is against free speech is a dangerous fanatic. How the hell is democracy supposed to work if the decision makers don't have access to information or the ability to discuss it in a public forum?
/r/MensRights17/04/16 06:56 PM
2

Women need alimony like a fish needs a bicycle.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 09:57 PM
0

What happens if a woman does it?
/r/MensRights10/03/16 07:50 PM
3

Not a documentary. Agitprop.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 09:28 PM
1

It's OK if they hate men. They hate women even more.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 07:50 PM
3

If you think killing people is the answer then you are a dangerous, mentally unstable fanatic and should be treated as such.
/r/MensRights14/02/16 06:55 PM
2

Anytime you see eliminationist rhetoric like this you know you are dealing with the mentally unstable, and potentially criminally insane.
/r/MensRights07/02/16 06:44 PM
3

Feminism lost all credibility during the Clinton years. Everything since then just re-confirms that they care nothing about women, only politics.
/r/MensRights07/02/16 06:39 PM
9

Barbara Ross' perspective is essentially that all women are infants / incompetents who cannot make their own, adult decisions. I reject that view.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 08:46 PM
1

Weren't feminists talking just a few months ago about rape is the worst thing ever?
/r/MensRights30/01/16 03:10 PM
7

Class C misdemeanor. 15 days in stir. Should have lost her job.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 04:44 PM
11

49 states to go.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 04:39 PM
7

This might be the most evil thing I've ever read.
/r/MensRights25/01/16 12:06 AM
4

Maybe. Usually these are law students working under professional supervision. Sometimes professionals donating time. They might have access to some tools, but if she moved recently and is trying to hide, those tools are less useful. Doesn't hurt to try. Ask if they can help find her. If not, a mutual friend might know. Maybe recent birth records? Otherwise you are looking at hiring a PI.
/r/MensRights14/01/16 12:18 AM
7

It is increasingly clear to me that modern feminism is all about blaming men for women's own failures and insecurities.
/r/MensRights13/01/16 07:16 PM
10

Try legal aid. They usually handle routine family matters for free - or at least on a sliding scale. You'll need to find her though. Save a few hundred bucks for a PI.
/r/MensRights13/01/16 07:09 PM
6

It's a status thing. A male doctor marries a nurse. No one thinks this is a big deal. Female doctor marries a male nurse, and her perceived social status goes down. The thing is, this is a choice that the female doctor makes. It's no one's problem but her own.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 04:45 PM
1

Wants "equality," but also special exemptions. If they didn't have double standards they wouldn't have any standards at all.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 05:34 PM
2

What is "radical anti-feminism"?
/r/MensRights10/11/15 09:06 PM
2

Feminists destroy whatever they touch. The only survivors are the ones who fight back.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 08:21 PM
5

If the word "too" messes you up, your life is already hopeless.
/r/MensRights28/10/15 04:07 PM
2

30 WHOLE days? What's the penalty for jaywalking?
/r/MensRights24/10/15 07:21 PM
1

We saw what it will mean in South Park just 2 weeks ago.
/r/MensRights23/10/15 03:28 PM
5

Due Process is Constitutional. Title IX is a statute. Constitution wins every time. Never trust anyone who wants to mess with your Constitutional rights, no matter how much they promise it's for your or the greater good.
/r/MensRights21/10/15 08:30 PM
1

During the 20's and 30's many westerners 'fled' to the new workers' paradise in the Soviet Union. Those who weren't imprisoned and/or killed generally wanted to return 'home' too. They became some of the best witnesses to the realities of the Soviet Union at a time when many Western intellectuals were flirting with the awesomeness of totalitarianism. I think the parallels are striking.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 05:09 PM
3

I heard it has something to do with chromosomes.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 09:33 PM
27

Marriage is not a retirement program for women.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 07:41 PM
2

Modern feminism is the result of having won all the important battles. So, now what to do? Answer - make up new problems.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 06:11 PM
3

This is why Constitutional Rights matter. Some things are too important to allow politicians to experiment.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 06:01 PM
11

From the article: "The proposition we were to debate at Manchester was: 'Does modern feminism have a problem with free speech?' Given that the justification for my exclusion was my challenge to dodgy feminist rape statistics, I believe that question has been conclusively answered."
/r/MensRights08/10/15 08:02 PM
1

There is a pretty good book on this topic.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 05:07 PM
3

He's not a Senator. He's the Congressman from Colorado's CD2.
/r/MensRights23/09/15 06:36 PM
19

Your sperm, your problem. Courts have been consistent on this. Given a choice between paying more welfare to single moms and finding the unlucky donor to force him to pay, they always choose the latter. Follow the money chaps.
/r/MensRights06/09/15 09:21 PM
2

I'm shocked. TSA has a 96% fail rate for detecting weapons, so how did they find this one?
/r/MensRights28/08/15 07:22 PM
1

This. Makes. Me. Mad.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 10:14 PM
1

Guess their movement isn't based on well-reasoned discourse.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 10:12 PM
20

Smells like a lawsuit.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 06:57 PM
3

You are, of course, correct. But I do love the idea of one college kid handing the other $1 and that making everything OK. Then if there is a claim of assault, the judge need only ask "Did you take the dollar?" Yes. "Case dismissed. Get this whore out of my courtroom!"
/r/MensRights23/07/15 09:31 PM
11

Prostitution has a nice tie in with the yes means yes movement. What better evidence of consent than money changing hands?
/r/MensRights23/07/15 06:24 PM
9

Anyone who thinks someone else needs 'reeducation' is a dangerous fanatic.
/r/MensRights22/07/15 11:23 PM
3

You mean it might have something to do with chromosomes? Hater.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 09:30 PM
1

“I suddenly realized what’s happening. This is a stand-in for a wedding ceremony.”
/r/MensRights09/07/15 03:55 PM
2

Shocking? It's intentional, and anyone familiar with these people will expect this kind of insanity.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 03:35 PM
4

All New Zealanders are inbred, sheep molesting reprobates. Now, come and get me.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 04:46 PM
5

It's amazing how little sympathy judges have for ex-husbands.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 03:27 PM
3

Chick has mental health issues.
/r/MensRights07/06/15 06:19 PM
1

"Shut up", she explained.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 01:43 PM
1

It will never 'close' because it doesn't exist. That makes it an ideal political rallying cry.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 01:56 PM
204

There are no consequences, so why not.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 03:21 PM
4

Most states have a maximum amount that can be garnished. Sounds like the judge is a real piece of work, so you will need to make the strongest case possible. That means getting an attorney. Any chance that the union might provide one? Sadly, this kind of shit is pretty common.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 07:06 PM
0

I'm in. Taking the kids this weekend.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 07:43 PM
1

If we don't want to give it up, who the f*ck is going to take it from us? You? Phfft.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 09:51 PM
67

It's worse than that. A man can be forced to pay for child support even when he can prove he is not the biological father.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 05:20 PM
1

There is a perception that some feminist elements have transitioned from pro-woman to anti-man. The men's rights movement is a response to that.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 05:09 PM
4

One group might listen. The other will try to kill them.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 04:50 PM
6

Feminists in the US lost all credibility during the Clinton presidency. They are still out there, but they'll never again have the support they once did.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 05:46 PM
3

Mother can't waive child support because the money supposedly belongs to the children, but if the court blessed this arrangement then it will probably stick.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 07:08 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter