TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

thapussypatrol Archive

View 1 posts and 185 comments by thapussypatrol on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
77

Red Pill Theorythapussypatrol/r/TheRedPill05/01/19 08:13 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I don’t think we are disagreeing - I never technically argued against this - it’s just the same reasoning of ‘black people being less trustworthy due to the reality of crime statistics - I’m not arguing with the statistics - I am saying it is prejudiced and if a woman thinks literally any bi man should be dismissed or be seen as disgusting because of his sexuality then the reasoning, you’d have to admit, is identical - I don’t even believe women think of no men as ‘disgusting’ because of anythin…
/r/MensRights24/04/25 09:01 PM
2

Then you agree that whether true or not, it is homophobic, which was the OP's premise all along.
/r/MensRights24/04/25 08:40 PM
-2

I mean, your last paragraph is surely implying both homophobia and misandry - how is that better? Re: AIDs and STDs, if you’re saying bi men are statistically more likely than straight men to get STDs (condoms surely apply in both cases) that’s still prejudiced e.g. black people are less trustworthy because they commit a lot more crimes on a per capita basis and using this to justify racism
/r/MensRights24/04/25 08:01 PM
41

The thing re: bisexual men, is immediately what I thought when reading this post title I went through a sincerely bi-curious era about a decade ago and the amount of utter *disgust* (either subtle or extremely not subtle) I got from girls when I mentioned it was unbelievable. I remember too that I and a girl had a mutual friend and she mentioned that he was bi and how it made her want to be 'physically sick'.
/r/MensRights24/04/25 06:41 PM
1

What hurt me recently was I’ve decided recently take some time out of employment after 6 non-stop years, due to what I largely believe to be depression-based, and my own sister has decided, after already having nearly a year off via maternity leave, has taken paid sick leave due to what she believes is her own depression - on Easter Sunday she insisted that I ‘can’t just sit around not working’ even though this is literally what she has been doing and will now continue to be doing, on the compan…
/r/MensRights22/04/25 11:55 PM
7

A woman who spent all day with other women probably had an unfortunate black pilling in this area lol
/r/MensRights17/04/25 12:13 AM
2

I mean, I suppose, but there will be a limit to that
/r/TheRedPill16/04/25 09:26 PM
20

Can confirm: I'm a short guy and I used to have pathological levels of confidence: worked a treat.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/25 07:15 PM
4

I know some of you will find this really difficult to believe, but, literally: some girls don't care that much, man...
/r/TheRedPill16/04/25 07:12 PM
6

I know loads of girl that enjoy their labiectomy - live and let live, bigot! It wasn't even a clitorectomy and they prefer how it looks and it's easier to clean, god!
/r/MensRights15/04/25 02:50 AM
5

Any time, control-_-freak
/r/PussyPassDenied03/04/25 08:38 PM
2

Dating apps and second wave feminism, coupled by male & female natures = the playing out of pretty much everything the red pill/manosphere people are explaining pretty coherently about dating and sexual dynamics - when a man is raised with expectations about women and dating that don't live up to reality at all (just like his expectations about all sorts of socio-economic realities) he is likely to dig deeper and deeper into that stuff to get out of that societal echo chamber that props up the '…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 07:49 PM
5

Cope harder
/r/PussyPassDenied03/04/25 07:36 PM
6

Damn, guys are thirsty for literal pedos these days huh
/r/PussyPassDenied03/04/25 06:41 PM
1

see? Men do care more in the relationship!
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 04:06 PM
0

'Being a top'(tm) =/= never being penetrated or enjoying penetration
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 03:19 PM
5

Okay, well you're an outlier and an exception to the rule then - I'm not saying that there aren't exceptions to rules - to generalise a human group as this or that is almost inherently the same thing as saying 'some [group]' to [group] because humans are complicated beings Also, you can at least surely see that bisexuality is more feminine if it is men engaging in feminine behaviour (fucking males), right...? Most females tend to fuck males, and most males tend to fuck females - it's a crude thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 02:59 PM
10

If you judge a person based on their 'opportunities for' but not their 'instances of' cheating then 'women' must be the most dubious people in all of society, surely? Even bisexual men probably technically have fewer actual opportunities to cheat than women do, or at least regarding the ratios involved - it would also mean that high value men, having more 'opportunities', must be off-putting in same way bisexual men are, but that's obviously far from reality
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 02:46 PM
16

I think it's really easy to understand why; being bisexual represents a femininity and an image of weakness vs the alternative - it's less masculine and manly given the stereotypes of bisexuality/homosexuality - women want a masculine, testosterone-fuelled, strong man who can confidently lead and protect them - the stereotypes upon bisexual men being more homosexual and therefore more weak, culturally 'flimsy and flamboyant', less masculine/dominant and less stereotypically 'male' do not trigger…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 02:18 PM
3

Depends on your definitions, OP; If this isn't homophobic, then being turned completely off by black people is also not racist
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/25 07:12 PM
5

I think the conventional wisdom with that quotation in mind is not to ask the handsome guys who don't rely on anything but their looks - it's to ask the average/ugly yet successful guys who are getting by more on their personality
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/25 06:18 PM
16

It's obvious women don't only date assholes - assholes just evidently aren't a demographic they filter out very effectively (or in some cases girls do like it) - a nice (not 'nice') guy with fewer desirable traits will lose vs. an asshole with more desirable traits - if anything, it tends to be the case that this phenomenon of 'too nice' is definitely more unattractive than 'being an asshole' (or too much of one) provided 'being an asshole' doesn't get to genuine sociopathy/narcissism to the poi…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/25 03:45 PM
2

Between 1 and 10% (internationally) is absolutely insane (median 3%) and between 17-33% when paternity is in doubt. You might not think that is particularly high, but that is a significant number of couples; it's not a freakishly small number as though it was comparable with winning the lottery or something. Hell, even if you took the most conservative, minimalistic estimate which is 1% rounded, it's the same percentage of couples as there are as trans individuals in the UK population, and most …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/25 05:35 PM
1

Oh, you know the stereotypes of autistic people - they're more outwardly like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/25 02:52 PM
15

You realise the red pill isn't a 'woman are bad, men are good' movement, right? It's more concerned with objective realities above all. It can be pro-men, but it doesn't lie to be it. Men and women are different - most men are more 'logical' than most women to generalise, and women are more socially perceptive than most men to generalise - women's EQ is naturally stronger, and it's evolutionary, just like men's strength is evolutionary. Men are more thing-oriented, and women are more people-orie…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/25 12:40 PM
3

...Until you realise how high the percentage of paternity fraud is...
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/25 11:48 AM
0

Hard-agree and I think if it's made compulsory it will (a) prevent the awkward conversation, and (b) it will stabilise the relationship by both deterring cheating (to some extent anyway) and eliminate paternity doubt - the pros severely outweigh the cons for this. Paternity fraud is effectively the worst thing ever for a man, too, and the injustice of a man paying for another man's child is unimaginable; I don't think women tend to understand this as deeply as men because they'll never have to b…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/25 11:46 AM
10

I disagree that autistic women aren't better at masking, but I hard-agree that they'd have a far easier time both getting approached, forming relationships and so on (I doubt that's really a controversy) - even a lot of autistic women (provided they're not severe) are socially intelligent relative to a decent amount of men, and this is probably why they're less likely to get diagnosed - I've met both autistic women and autistic men - the women had to tell me they were autistic for me to know it …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/25 11:35 AM
4

Guess they ought not vote until the age of 25 But typically enough it tends to be those women heavily advocating that young and often naive women turn out
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 05:26 AM
–

I’m not making radical suggestions: women fuck who they want and men fuck who they can - that is a generalization but is it a quite effective one - me as a man I am the complete opposite of most men because I don’t care about sex very much compared even to a lot of women my age, but I’m not going to sit here and say you should think about men like you think about me Men and women both engage in shallow sex - both men and women cheat for sex - both men and women masturbate/watch porn - the dividi…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 12:42 AM
–

I’m not claiming that because I’m an exception to a rule then that must mean the exception should be referred to as if it’s relevant - I don’t think you technically even disagree with any of the suppositions I would be making here - what are you disagreeing with me over exactly? What exception am I making?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 12:13 AM
–

So you aren’t speaking about women, you’re just speaking about yourself…useful.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 12:05 AM
–

So how do one night stands exist
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/25 11:54 PM
3

Okay then: 'no'.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/25 07:49 PM
3

Compared to women, the answer is a resounding 'no' Men's preferences with looks are really challenging not to meet. Because they're quite lax, all things considered. Compare them to the clipboard of criteria most women seem to have with looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/25 07:40 PM
2

Most men think most women are attractive, and most women think most men are unattractive. Their care re: looks makes up a higher proportion of their preferences overall, but again: because women care about everything more than men, doesn't mean they care less about looks This is like saying 'I need 2 apples. You need 6 apples and 3 oranges; Therefore, you must care about apples less than me because my proportion of apples to other fruits is 100% but it's 66% for you'
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/25 06:47 PM
–

Again, this only works by generalising; It isn't whether she uses the privilege that makes it a privilege or not. The privilege itself is the optionality and the opportunity. In my example, just because I don't like McDonalds very much doesn't make my free access to it anything but a privilege in terms of the pure definition of 'privilege'. Ones usage of a privilege or not doesn't change the fact that you have that privilege. (a) she doesn't have to use the privilege just like high value men don…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/25 06:05 PM
5

I don't think they're talking about cooks, delivery drivers and janitors - a lot of women these days' standards is like '$100,000 at minimum' - also: men and women care about physical attraction - the fallacy here is that just because men have fewer criteria than women for attraction (including physical looks) that must mean that they care a lot about looks - no, in fact, women actually care far more about looks, objectively speaking, than men do - they care about EVERYTHING more than men, basic…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/25 06:02 PM
–

so all sex outside of a relationship is (a) prostitution or (b) gay sex lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/25 05:53 PM
–

I think you're ironically proving the point...
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/25 05:15 PM
–

That doesn't make it not a privilege though - and to be honest you're generalising women's opinions about sex when you say this, whether or not you qulify it with 'usually' (or else how are one night stands even a thing?); that doesn't change anything technically - I could say 'I don't like McDonalds as much as my friend does, and I get McDonalds for free - but because I don't like it as much I don't consider that a privilege' and it's on the same level as this.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/25 05:13 PM
2

Apex fallacies all over the place here A lot of what you're saying is like if I said "the vast majority of geniuses are male - women, why are you all so thick??'
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 06:54 PM
–

Lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 12:25 PM
–

So you’re saying all elderly men that are married to elderly women…secretly don’t love their wives and would rather be alone…?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 12:23 PM
–

Right, I'm sure elderly women provide reproductive benefits. Also, 'he fears losing money' why would he agree to marry her then if his attraction expires when her youth does?!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 12:19 PM
–

That is genuinely one of the biggest copes, and one of the biggest pieces of bullshit, I've ever read on here. I'm not even exaggerating. so men are generally society's go-getters and are valued for being as such...buuut they are too lazy in this one area that women are mysteriously hyperactive on...wow.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 10:55 AM
–

lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 10:52 AM
–

...what percent of divorces these days are initiated by men though?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 10:47 AM
–

so...how do men stay married to women when they're both elderly...?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 10:38 AM
11

I think there's a difference between 'men have low standards' and 'women's standards, compared to men's, are delusional' and they can both be true at the same time - this is why when the women on those podcasts (whatever, fresh and fit etc) do the 'female delusion calculator' their minimums for attraction from the opposite sex often constitutes far less than 1% of the US population - often it's 0.1% or even 0.05%. There's having reasonable standards and then there's 'having standards so high tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/25 07:00 PM
1

Well it’s not really a camp but a reality, but if you say so… Not if her hypergamy is satisfied enough, no, not necessarily- status and economic strength is pretty black and white though, so if she makes a lot of money vs the man it is hard to spin the man as being a provider anymore, surely - if her high value only comes from looks, then a man can still bring her value via his ability to bring value in provisions and his economic strength is definitely weakened by her own, so that’s why the ide…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/25 05:55 PM
1

I think you’re approaching it differently, it’s not important enough to debate No I said socio-economic status was arguably at the cost of loyalty, because if a woman makes a lot of money and becomes very powerful in a particular field, that causes her bar for what a man then has to make that much higher, because women are hypergamous, and status, finances etc is one of those masculine power asymmetries that women take for granted, whereas looks aren’t quite as gendered in the same way because m…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/25 05:31 PM
1

No the value itself is what you can make quantitative, I.e how much value vs is there value at all And no, I think you’re getting confused.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/25 05:25 PM
1

Well, is high value a purely quantitative or qualitative thing? I’m going with the latter as it’s easier to understand and explain - I think you’re going with the former, and that’s fine: technically a higher* value woman will just max-out these traits and arguably being in some bonuses, but bringing socio-economic strength (one example the OP mentioned) arguably is a paradox for a heterosexual relationship in some contexts, because it may well be at the cost of her loyalty and innocence that pl…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/25 05:04 PM
1

You’re suggesting some other people are then? Okay?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/25 04:16 PM
1

Isn’t that what you’re suggesting? Or else why are we having this conversation?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/25 04:14 PM
1

The difference is if there’s a mutual benefit or not in terms of the bigger picture - it’s not hard to understand - if the woman is barely providing any value to a man’s life, why would he feel good providing so much value to hers?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/25 04:10 PM
4

Because there’s a difference somewhere between providing value mutually and being taking advantage of for what you’re getting in return?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/25 04:07 PM
-4

Men and women tend to make the mistake that 'I find it attractive so that must mean the opposite sex does' - you mentioned financials and social status for instance - women love that stuff, but men don't care (assuming by 'financials' you mean 'has wealth) - it's like making the mistake of 'I like tall men, so men must like tall women' - we have complimenting yet completely distinct mating strategies and what might make sense to women's will not at all for men's - a woman's education and social …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/25 02:58 PM
1

With me it was like I had to either be the begrudged winner of an argument I didn’t give a fuck about, or I lost the fight and she would never let me forget it - and I would never start those arguments - those arguments were either conscious or subconscious shit tests that I consciously or subconsciously knew I had to either overcome or only lose out on due to some kind of code of honour, e.g. I would lose a fight by being a more morally principled human being, and she’d win by being completely …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 10:53 PM
1

Yes, literally - shit testing like that is something that can often happen on the subconscious level to filter out weak men - it makes perfect sense - it is deeply instinctive and emotional and not at all a logical thing, although some look to it like women sabotaging their own relationships - it is the same thing - it is a matter of much greater perceptiveness than what men often have, and it plays into this idea that women’s social eq is genius compared with a man’s
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 08:57 PM
1

I do agree with the idea that if she doesn't show S tier choosing signals from the outset then it's not worth pursuing - the only relationship I had (for almost 5 years) was one where she was extremely keen straight away - the reason that relationship lasted as long as this was because she liked me a lot more than I liked her, especially in the first half of the relationship, meaning she had a scarcity mindset whereas I didn't in comparison - relationships are stable only in so far as the man is…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 10:21 AM
1

What advice do you mean by "choose better"? "Choose better" generally is aimed at women who chose bad boys that cheated on them, or left them pregnant, or caused them to become single mothers - "Choose better" is not "develop impossibly high standards such that most genuine, decent men are phased out", which is kind of what's happening today, and I don't think it's got anything to do with the advice of "choose better". There's nothing wrong with "high" standards concerning men's behaviour and mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 05:35 PM
7

There're levels to this: If she couldn't spell or use basic grammar, punctuation and so on then I wouldn't be able to take her seriously at all, and this would be a deal breaker for me. If she didn't read books recreationally I wouldn't mind massively (I used to but don't very much these days), but I'd definitely prefer it if she was at least intellectually curious - if she was so intellectually uncurious that she knew very little about anything then that would probably be somewhat of a deal bre…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 05:29 PM
1

Thinks about the incentives and disincentives, OP - think of the economic matrices: Proposition woman at gym > fail (high chance) > get called creep, potentially kicked out, ego bruised Proposition woman at gym > fail (high chance) > don't get called creep or get kicked out, but ego is still bruised Proposition woman at gym > succeed (low chance) > it might not even work out anyway, she might flake, etc Proposition woman at gym > succeed (low chance) > it might work out, but the odds of that are…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 03:24 PM
1

Okay, but just realise this is why people aren't getting married anymore; if you remove the stigma of divorce, and that was perhaps the only thing preventing certain women for having divorces for the pay-offs, then men will consider marriage as nothing but a contract of "she gets half of my stuff if she wants it more than she wants me". If one party has a significant incentive to leave the other, without the stigma of divorce then that would mean most divorcees are women, surely? [checks] Ah. Ye…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 03:04 PM
1

You're right, OP The idea that "he needs to be taller than men when I'm wearing stilts" is a really bad thing for a human civilisation because men that used to be considered comparatively tall may now become comparatively short. That when stacked against all sorts of other things i.e. women out-earning men in some cases is absolutely dreadful for attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 03:00 PM
–

In my opinion: Both sexes have a certain minimum threshold of attraction, but women's is higher Men as a proportion of all of their criteria care about looks more on balance, but women care about EVERYTHING more than men, so technically women do care abouts looks "more" than men regarding the actual amount - they just care about other things that men basically don't care at all about, so as a ratio its importance relatively speaking looks lower, but the actual extent of "caring" isn't lower at a…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 02:54 PM
5

In the UK at least we have a principle that a crime cannot be beneficial in a court of law i.e. you can't murder your parents and gain their inheritance as a result - it ought to be the exact same principle at work in cases like these; you cannpot be unjustly enriched from your paedophilic rape by the law.
/r/MensRights20/08/24 11:14 PM
13

‘I’m forcing you into an ideological argument’? You mean the acceptance of how not all pregnancies are done with the intent to have a child? Is that some kind of major controversy?
/r/MensRights04/08/24 01:58 PM
22

You’re not answering me and you’re obfuscating with tangents, so that says everything
/r/MensRights04/08/24 01:55 PM
33

Is she forced to carry the child to term with this logic? Ban abortion, therefore?
/r/MensRights04/08/24 12:58 PM
33

And the women?
/r/MensRights04/08/24 12:31 PM
57

Gotta remember at the end of the day that RJ Rowlingis a feminist - she just doesn't believe in the trans stuff
/r/MensRights02/08/24 12:07 PM
4

Pro-choice ultimately, but I have empathies for those that do have their (non-religious) views against abortion, because there are some sides to those stances that I can understand to a large extent - my views on abortion, however, have nothing to do with my objections to single motherhood
/r/MensRights29/07/24 12:44 AM
2

The idea of an app where women MUST make the first move is an app for a very small niche of women, so I don't find it surprising that Bumble are changing that mechanic
/r/MensRights12/05/24 08:37 AM
1

proportionally men drive a lot more than women in the sort of circumstances that lend themselves to accidents i.e. long distances (i.e. occupational driving) but controlling for this then women do tend to get into accidents more on balance; Males do 62% of the driving, but cause 58% of the accidents
/r/MensRights12/05/24 08:26 AM
3

I see somebody else got to the answer first but, yeah: they only wear that for chad - the technology to censor themselves only for melvin doesn't exist yet, but there's a damn-good alternative: make melvin, not chad, feel bad by calling him a pervert in the mean time - other women know the game she's playing, so they join in
/r/MensRights12/05/24 08:16 AM
2

To think feminists would be upset over women not being called on to die in a war due to equality figures? It's the same reason women would be moping if brick-layers were half and half male to female
/r/MensRights12/05/24 08:07 AM
11

If they'd said "black person" instead of "man" suddenly the vibe changes, somehow
/r/MensRights07/05/24 03:12 PM
2

What do you mean by "safe"? I've been through this kind of phase in my life where I effectively abandon the social world around me because I am that discontented by it all, partially (probably) due to depression/anxiety etc, but you'll severely regret taking that step because it's a step you will have a huge amount of difficulties reversing. Even if it's not so comfortable to maintain, some level of friendship circle is extremely important for your mental health, even if you're reclusive
/r/MensRights25/04/24 12:31 PM
2

This will encourage people to have children, oh yes. But it is going to encourage them to be shitty parents. If you give money to the birthing but not the parenting then what benefit of motive is there to do the latter?
/r/MensRights23/04/24 07:05 PM
36

Feminism going through the motions until now: Women are equal Women are actually better than men Men are actually all potentially rapists (metoo movement) Men, terrified of a false rape accusation and generally too demoralised in the current era to attempt courtship with the ones that aren't 405s, largely give up on women and go their own way, and a cultural partition of the sexists gradually solidifies Either: (a) civilisation crumbles as a result, or (b) we go full circle and the separation of…
/r/MensRights21/04/24 09:43 PM
1

Hypergamy is evolutionary though Hypergamy just meant that women would value men because men were socially and physically superior to them However, in a world where physicalities don't matter so much, and where socially women are equal to men, only the top echelons of men will suit this idea of "socially and physically superior" i.e. wealthy, strong/tall, intelligent, etc (and attractive, of course) If you combine this feminist society with things like dating apps, you will quickly find out how …
/r/MensRights05/04/24 11:32 PM
3

These days with the obsessive woke progressives trying so desperately hard to move the needle of society and bend it so quickly to its ideas of good, I'm reminded of why the ideas and morals in the bible got put into there: despite how they weren't idealistic, they were tried and tested, for thousands of years, and stuck around because they stabilised society. The exact opposite of what's going on right now that tends to be extremely opposed to christian values.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 11:26 PM
19

Child abuse
/r/MensRights05/04/24 12:38 AM
6

I think feminism is premised culturally on the idea that men are problematic This is why you get such bizzare cultural standards upon men and women that often don't make sense despite how we're meant to be equal - if men criticise women for this or that action, it's always through the "men are negative/unfair" lens of feminists, but it's never the other way around and women often get the power of feminism but not the responsibility of being that kind of empowered person in a society. Women, bein…
/r/MensRights01/04/24 10:13 AM
9

I'll say at least this: porn addiction itself, not just porn, causes serious erectile dysfunction for a certain share of men - and there are studies about it; Gary Wilson's "your brain on porn" and "The Porn Trap" by Wendy and Larry Maltz are two great resources that go through all the stats about the emerging neurological understandings relating to porn - porn in terms of dopamine is more addictive than a lot of things in life (even drugs) because it's free and it's massively pleasurable - it w…
/r/MensRights24/03/24 11:33 AM
5

No reason to risk it if you ask me - whether it's controversial or not, women are far more led by emotions than men - the emotional reaction of a crying male partner isn't necessarily going to be a rational one - if the man is meant to be this stoic, rock-like figure providing emotional stability, the image of him crying is going to fuck with the formula in a woman's mind - it's going to be less "wow he must be really sad, I empathise" and more like "wow, I thought I could rely on his protection…
/r/MensRights20/03/24 08:09 AM
9

That's fine if this is what she's looking for in a relationship But, you know, don't kick up a fuss if a male employer says "I don't do 50/50 with men and women's salaries" "oh that's different" naaaaah not really - because men are supposed to have more money for women like you, right?
/r/MensRights15/03/24 11:33 PM
72

Of course women are always the primary victim in male suicides, you understand?
/r/MensRights25/02/24 11:59 AM
2

Damn, this is literally my ex-girlfriend, and this is literally me. 5 years almost, too.
/r/seduction17/02/24 02:37 PM
1

Let me guess - this is the UK
/r/MensRights04/10/23 05:42 PM
36

Another thing you find: If she wants the baby, life is sacred / this was all your doing If she doesn't, her body her choice - you have no say / it's just a bundle of cells anyway It's her body her choice, but if she smokes cigarettes / meth (etc) during the pregnancy that's dreadful, as if, I don't know, it's a child being harmed...? but an abortion doesn't do the same?
/r/MensRights15/09/23 03:00 PM
52

Another reason to avoid single mothers
/r/MensRights15/09/23 11:24 AM
1

Honour
/r/MensRights30/04/23 10:29 AM
1

I'm a libertarian - I was a socialist before I hit 18 though
/r/MensRights27/02/23 09:26 PM
1

If they've got it on video, and they can prove she was in the UAE at the time, then she's fucked and that's her own fault
/r/PussyPassDenied18/02/23 12:15 PM
3

Imagine doing this to a 16 year old girl for a sexist comment about men...
/r/MensRights05/02/23 05:05 PM
82

'for the death of a 5-year-old in her care' sounds like she was just negligent or irresponsible - she *beat* the child to death
/r/PussyPassDenied16/12/22 07:11 AM
2

Was this their quoted reason? That's certainly a new one
/r/MensRights06/04/22 06:11 PM
0

"Controversial Remarks"
/r/PussyPassDenied20/02/22 02:01 PM
23

'I was a naive, inexperienced 23 year old, head in the clouds, hippie-dippy, leftist (still am, but now am a more pragmatic materialist Marxist rather than a rose-tinted anarchist)' Hahahahahah that's a good one
/r/TheRedPill13/02/22 11:27 AM
1

^This
/r/MensRights08/05/21 07:11 AM
2

...is this actually enshrined in a statute somewhere? this sounds bogus
/r/MensRights08/05/21 07:05 AM
2

In that case, and maybe you agree, it shouldn't be called the 'age of consent' - it should be 'the legal sexing age' or something to that affect, to bring it in line with alcohol, driving, voting, pronography consumption (etc) restriction titles
/r/MensRights08/05/21 07:04 AM
103

In the article they mention the male is 15 - how can it be rape if the age of consent is 16? how can you rape if you can't form the mental capacity to consent to sex? how can one be criminally liable for what they don't have the capacity to understand? that's what the age of consent is, right?
/r/MensRights07/05/21 07:12 PM
3

do you realise that in criminal law you can absolutely be found to have mens rea even if you didn't necessarily intend harm? you realise that recklessness and gross negligence are forms of mens rea, right? Also, I'm really not sure why you're trying to confine the concept of liability to the civil realm - 'liability' is just another term for responsibility - if you are being found to be the substantive and operative cause of harm without intervening factors (and you have intent or recklessness/n…
/r/PussyPassDenied31/03/21 12:46 PM
1

No it isn't. It's a question of criminal liability. It can become relevant in Torts but it's still an aspect of criminal law.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/03/21 11:31 AM
5

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eggshell_skull The only thing you need to prove is that the perpetrator intended to cause the victim serious and foreseeable harm. In this case, that is BLINDINGLY obvious to a reasonable person.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/03/21 10:57 AM
25

Urgh. Croydon...
/r/PussyPassDenied31/12/20 06:39 PM
1

the word physical refers to literally that - therefore, no - if you're physical with a car or if you're physical with another person, you are still being "physical". being physical with either a car or a person is bad. what you should be pursuing with an ethical disagreement with me about whether the woman was validated in hitting the man for hitting the car - you should NOT be pursuing a linguistic disagreement like you've been doing.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/09/20 06:00 AM
1

I said physical in the first place - are you really under the persuasion that I was saying they were being physical but not physically acting? so, what, they were physically non-acting? if somebody does something physical, surely by definition that would constitute an action within this spatial and temporal universe of ours? again, I just feel bad for you for actually going down this road; "they were being physical but they didn't act physically"~
/r/PussyPassDenied23/09/20 08:32 PM
1

physically kicking a physical object is what amounts to a physical act. you're an idiot.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/09/20 04:15 PM
1

if something is "physical", what do you think this means exactly? answer that clearly - if something is being "physical", as opposed to "non-physical", what does that mean? you think this ONLY related to human beings touching human beings and not the concept of physicality? jesus christ...imagine that: ignoring the definition of "physical" because you so badly want to twist what somebody else is saying...
/r/PussyPassDenied22/09/20 06:51 AM
0

"physical", yes. that's not what you claimed I was saying originally though.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/09/20 04:24 AM
0

I didn't say physical assault
/r/PussyPassDenied20/09/20 09:43 PM
-9

Mate, he made it physical, by kicking the car. It's not biased.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/09/20 05:43 PM
37

How's that "perfectly understandable"? What are we even talking about?
/r/PussyPassDenied23/06/20 06:19 PM
1

I don't get the issue here - why not just trim up? after losing weight various times (on two occasions about a stone and a half, although I've never been fat) I can tell you there are ways that will make it incredibly easy to the point where you'll end up wondering why you never lost weight in the first place - always do what you can to stay in shape - it's great for your confidence too - if it's fat vs thin, it's thin. if it's thin vs muscular, it's muscular. but so things one at a time because…
/r/seduction09/03/19 05:57 PM
2

I'm not sure it ever made a significant difference but I definitely had tooth-related compliments - maybe that might have boosted confidence. I think a lot of girls definitely do care about teeth, but the most important thing regarding teeth is to just not have bad teeth - if you whiten them too much you'll look daft, like jack fincham
/r/seduction24/02/19 11:45 AM
1

no I'm not saying she ditches you. I'm saying you ditch her. if you don't, then it really is "a friend zone", forever.
/r/seduction24/02/19 11:43 AM
1

I pulled a taller girl last night - a foreign taller girl. if you have the confidence, humour, social skills and some kind of attractiveness then height isn't that important. in fact, I think being tall will probably stunt you somewhat because it doesn't force you to develop your personality so much.
/r/seduction23/02/19 11:53 PM
2

I think the most important anti-friendzone rule is to never fear losing a friend after potentially getting rejected. once you've gotten rid of that fear, the chances are you won't enter that zone to begin with. it's really hard to actually jump that initial hurdle though, of course. I was once friends with one girls for years. and another was one of my only friends in my first year of university. shit has to go down for it to potentially go up.
/r/seduction23/02/19 11:39 PM
1

last night I was at a nightclub and for a lot of the time I was alone too - also, I've met people alone at the same club and I will often see them around in it from time to time, just like last night. Last night in particular though I was in a fucking great mood even though I kept losing my sole friend whom I came into the place with. I was often in the outside smoking area goofing around with absolutely no fucks given. I kept sitting down with random people and putting on funny accents and more…
/r/seduction23/02/19 11:27 PM
1

"I chose to have 5 kids and you're not going to give me free shit for it?!"
/r/PussyPassDenied30/01/19 07:32 PM
2

we all know exactly why there's a huge increase in grooming gangs and acid attackers (and knife crime) in the UK these days
/r/PussyPassDenied17/01/19 11:01 PM
402

if this was a man he'd be getting way more than fucking 9 years.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/01/19 09:59 PM
-1

I wouldn't go into it with this desperate mindset
/r/seduction13/01/19 10:28 PM
0

..."don't call me fat"..."without calling me pretty"? :|
/r/PussyPassDenied12/01/19 07:10 AM
29

yeah, she did: her hit = 1 point for the hit itself, 1 point for the audacity to actually start a physical confrontation his hit = 2 points for being a stronger hit roughly equivalent in my eyes
/r/PussyPassDenied10/01/19 08:47 AM
5

women are naturally submissive, so they will definitely prefer a man to be assertive and able to stand up for themselves. that even covers men being quite persistent with them - last weekend after being at a nightclub I was walking off with a girl, picked her up (literally) and asked "your place or mine?" - all the while she was being resistant, but I instinctively understood the cues, seeing as she was already giving me all the signals of her attraction beforehand - women, being naturally submi…
/r/seduction08/01/19 04:02 PM
3

well I said this was at a nightclub
/r/TheRedPill07/01/19 01:24 AM
7

do you know what I've only this moment realised? the girl I went back with told me she had tonsillitis, and now my tonsils hurt. ffs. but just approach the ones you think look interesting, because that means you'll probably have things in common and hence things to chat about. I used to be quite alternative and I went up to the alt girls and it worked out well
/r/TheRedPill06/01/19 10:00 PM
17

hmm, I don't know - they won't be creating much of an aura of value for you unless they're flirting with you the whole time or something, and if they're friends, I'm not so sure they'd create that atmosphere for you. I'd say it would be better than being with purely male friends though.
/r/TheRedPill06/01/19 01:01 AM
3

First how did you time it right to get them all outside at the right time I just told them to stay outside and I'd be back in a minute - I think they had the impression that I was going to be buying them drinks or giving them cigarettes, or that I was trying to find my best friend inside the place. when I came back, I told the girl I was "with some friends" so it wouldn't have been "weird" immediately. secondly want happened to the other two did you get their numbers or not seems like a waste ot…
/r/TheRedPill05/01/19 09:50 PM
6

nah - when I was with these girls, I never was too explicit with my intentions - I gave them merely the anxiety of competition enough to be interested - I was never parading around with them as if I could have had a threesome; I said it was clear that they were interested in me, not so much that I was interested in them. Also I should mention that every now and then I'd have been talking to other dudes. you also need to realise that being comfortable and confident enough to do this without the m…
/r/TheRedPill05/01/19 09:40 PM
2

eventually you're going to have to crawl through the proverbial abyss to get over this. there's only so long you can moan about the fear of rejection.
/r/seduction04/01/19 07:04 AM
1

with that haircut? 6? maybe 7?
/r/seduction04/01/19 04:24 AM
1

nahhh. if it were me, a girl giving me one word replies would drive me nuts and I'd start to dislike her. I don't blame you.
/r/seduction03/01/19 09:21 PM
1

of course it matters - don't go to a nightclub looking like you've just come from the gym - women will know exactly what you're doing. just wear some clothes that (i) makes you feel confident, and (ii) shows your figure without it looking contrived; it will still be noticeable unless you're wearing baggy looking clothes - you have the right frame of mind because women definitely appreciate muscles, but not to the extent that they care about them more than your fashion.
/r/seduction03/01/19 04:49 PM
6

yep 1) don't be fat and don't be skinny - be as lean and muscular as you can be. there's absolutely no excuse here. and if you're short (like me) wear shoes that have a bit of a heel. 2) have good fashion - this is incredibly important because, in my opinion, most dudes look like shit due to their inability to understand what looks good and what looks goofy - also: be somewhat unique. have a bit of individuality. and accentuate things whenever you can; wear a nice watch, for instance. a good bel…
/r/seduction03/01/19 04:38 PM
2

it honestly sounds like you had her up on a pedestal from day 1 from the way you describe it - if you over-value a girl, she will think lesser of you and your value to her will diminish - you have to have an abundance mindset, and if you provided for her like this, no wonder she started to disrespect you - women need to be dominated - they will try to rationalise another scenario, but women are evolved to emotionally (positively) respond to dominant, confident men that do not depend on the compa…
/r/seduction03/01/19 04:29 PM
1

um, no. 6' is called tall. are you trolling me right now...? I doubt you genuinely think 6' is "average".
/r/seduction03/01/19 01:19 PM
1

Yea, I can't do much about height. I just got completely shafted on height lol. nah. nah you didn't though. you're average. don't call "average" "shafted".
/r/seduction03/01/19 02:50 AM
2

There is no rejection because you never asked her for her number yet. You know you can just go into that state and just feel that incredible confidence and connection and positive energy. You're not trying to do anything. You're just you!!v well, that was the one part that resonated - by not approaching her, you have just given her the reason to screen you out: by pretending you don't exist. by not approaching her, you are communicating to her that you are not good enough to, and that you are ou…
/r/seduction03/01/19 02:31 AM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JxrHxvDJwPI that's a video of his
/r/seduction03/01/19 02:21 AM
1

I'm 5'5, and my hairline has always looked like it's receding (it's not, but my dad is bald, so maybe some day). my face isn't amazing. I am skinny. I still manage. work on your fashion, your beard game (if you suit it), go to the gym, get a great haircut, etc.
/r/seduction03/01/19 02:16 AM
1

in what sense? face? body? height? balding?
/r/seduction03/01/19 02:10 AM
1

this guy is probably the best "PUA" on youtube, honestly. he makes RSD look like a bunch of chumps.
/r/seduction03/01/19 02:10 AM
1

ehhh I would say assume "yes" but it depends totally on whose script you guys are reading from; who is pursuing harder? if it's her, then no, because it reaffirms that you are on your time and not hers (you are the prize and she is after it, etc etc), and if it is you that's pursuing more, then only pay if you are dead sure that it will be worthwhile - don't gamble money on something that's not basically a sure-thing. also, you cannot let her get too comfortable with you paying for her like this…
/r/seduction03/01/19 02:07 AM
1

honestly, if it was me, I would just cut straight to the chase with this girl and avoid any worthless faffing-about. either she's down or she's not. don't worry yourself too much with her response. if she even does say no, you need to know that it is no loss; there are billions of women out there in this world, and she is one.
/r/seduction03/01/19 02:05 AM
1

She (18f) is a virgin and a year younger than me (19m) When the course started I managed to get close to her. We both talked a lot and became pretty close. I scalated to the point where she was always with me and if there was a bed in the room she was all the time touching and petting me (I did the same of course) We were in this point and well, she knew I liked her. that's good that you're entering this realism zone and not that daft "I don't know where I stand" mindset that so many guys fall i…
/r/seduction03/01/19 02:01 AM
1

eventually you kind of just get a mad-man kind of confidence that you know in your rational mind is potentially self-destructive (assuming your rational brain tends to be negative, or "realistic") but that hidden personality emerges every now and then and gets high off of the butterflies - he even enjoys getting rejected - he thinks it's funny. sometimes you've just got to flick that switch and go over the top of that trench into no man's land I did this sort of thing about a week ago just by as…
/r/seduction03/01/19 01:54 AM
1

why do you think you've remained a virgin? is it a personality thing or a looks thing?
/r/seduction03/01/19 01:45 AM
4

even if it was good advice, I wouldn't start going down a bad road - and honestly, I'm inherently suspicious of women who even attempt to advise men about women, so I'm not so inclined to take it seriously even if it was good advice. that's just the way it is - women don't know what they want because they don't study women's actions - they have emotions that aren't logical and even those emotions are often either (i) unpredictable, or (ii) against their logic, which they will use when advising m…
/r/seduction02/01/19 08:41 PM
6

Never take a woman's advice when it comes to attraction - RSD used to teach that. And now look at this...
/r/seduction02/01/19 08:13 PM
9

not even women themselves know what women want - it's all very instinctive and emotional, and women will never really be able to rationalise what they find attractive because it cannot be deduced logically (distinct, in some sense, with male attraction). what is certain is that you'll never know what a woman wants by listening to her - you'll only find it by watching what she does and what she is responding to.
/r/seduction02/01/19 06:46 PM
2

first of all, with all due respect: fuck no. nothing will get this girl dryer than to tell her "no woman fucked me before" - that will decrease your SMV to 0. that destroys any imaginary social proof with women you might have had before this. that absolutely guts any kind of idea she had of you being pursued by other women (which is the pre-selection value that women are after) - please do not tell her this because that is such an obvious error and it would be absolutely mind-boggling if you com…
/r/seduction02/01/19 06:33 PM
1

no I'm not being sarcastic, that's absolutely what happened haha - there has only been one night where I didn't go limp from molly, but during that night my friend (also on molly) felt it necessary to break down my door and ask to "join in" and sat down until I had to talk him out of it after about half an hour, and I'm not making this up
/r/TheRedPill01/01/19 08:25 AM
1

I remember two occasions where I had taken molly, had that iron confidence working and had taken girls home, and you know what happens when you take molly, right? what a let-down lol
/r/TheRedPill01/01/19 08:12 AM
1

taking molly at a nightclub is the best thing ever - the level of confidence it gives you is terrifyingly powerful - so powerful that you'll probably end up saying a load of stupid shit that you'll be kicking yourself over the next day, but in the moment, you'll feel like a god
/r/TheRedPill01/01/19 08:03 AM
14

every time I've taken LSD it's been a full-blown religious experience, so I'd feel very fragile in a nightclub of all places - I feel most people would ruin the vibes and fuck with your trip
/r/TheRedPill01/01/19 07:24 AM
27

hah, jesus christ, you took LSD at a nightclub? I'd have been absolutely terrified - did you micro-dose or something?
/r/TheRedPill01/01/19 07:16 AM
1

that's pretty trivial though - anybody can simply not call women derogatory words
/r/seduction30/12/18 08:44 PM
-2

don't waste your money - you don't need a book to learn this stuff
/r/seduction30/12/18 07:19 PM
4

if you really do consider yourself high value (and you ought to), then this outcome isn't important - if she's not having it, then she can take a hike; the laugh's on her for not giving you a chance (etc) - get into that mindset - girls are like this - girls will prefer to ignore you than to reject you outright, and girls will take a long time replying to play hard to get to generate value - if she never does get back to you, then like I said, I wouldn't get wound up - it's not worth that much w…
/r/seduction30/12/18 07:16 PM
2

generally, I think either she will want to talk to you, or she won't - if she does want to talk to you, she will make sure there are things to talk about - there's only so much you can do - even if there are things to talk about, she won't necessarily care if she doesn't want to talk to you in particular
/r/seduction30/12/18 07:11 PM
1

I am just letting you know: in all cases where I've been in a friendzone (or perceived it this way), either: (i) (the obvious) she clearly didn't feel the same and it was very clear - some girls will be very naturally flirty until you act just like them back. (ii) you will be friends with a girl until you eventually just tell her you like her (so that's with a bit of ambiguity of where the friendships heading) and she'll either say yes or no or (iii) the girl will think she is in the friendzone,…
/r/seduction30/12/18 07:07 PM
2

looks, game, and more looks.
/r/seduction30/12/18 07:02 PM
48

And thats the story, we have not met since then. I tried to talk her via whatsapp to meet up, but it did not end well (she ended not responding) and I did not meet her again. ...why are you asking this then?
/r/seduction30/12/18 05:11 PM
2

And I love how I get downvoted for sticking to facts and you get upvoted for making racist assumptions. Just goes to show what kind of people you are. mate if you're going to stoop as low as to call me racist for eluding to observable facts, then I won't even fucking bother with this essay of yours.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/12/18 03:34 PM
1

I am implying that it ought to be more socially acceptable to be more accurate with who you're banning - it wasn't "men", it was "north african/middle eastern" men - and just as a matter of fact, although not necessarily all of them are sexual assaulters, most of them happen to be this race, so it makes more sense to ban them than men because men, as 50% of the population, are not the problem - it would be like banning "human beings" because the sexual assaulters happened to be homo sapiens
/r/PussyPassDenied19/12/18 03:09 PM
22

lmao right, let's take a look at these links then. this will be funny. Are they no-go zones? Well, not really. This term caught on in international media after it was used by a columnist to label these areas, but police and emergency services have themselves repeatedly rejected it, because they're scared of coming off as racist, as is swedish custom at this stage. that's why they don't report racial demographics of crime. no shit. arguing that these are areas with a higher police presence, if an…
/r/PussyPassDenied19/12/18 05:54 AM
18

The no-go zones are not just as simple as “white people are scared of the evil brown people!!” there’s way more to it than that and most of them have nothing to do with immigrants, it’s just Swedish police getting better at identifying risky areas which are present in literally every country. can you please stop this needless bullshit? if the police tell you that you cannot go into those areas because they won't be able to save you if you get into trouble because they will be heavily outnumbered…
/r/PussyPassDenied19/12/18 05:26 AM
31

I'm "pulling it out of my ass"? buddy, please, do some research. sexual crimes in sweden have skyrocketed in line with the introduction of north african/middle eastern "refugees" - in fact, in neighbouring Norway (with similar policies) they actually have classes where they teach the newcomers that it's not okay to rape women. why do you think they'd have to teach them such a thing? oh right - because in those parts of the world, feminism hasn't drifted over yet. you have to understand just how …
/r/PussyPassDenied19/12/18 03:40 AM
40

yeah, and I'm wondering just how it is socially acceptable to hate men but not the people who are overwhelmingly committing the crimes :') it's as if you'd be saying "no men allowed" if you knew specifically that there was a ginger gang of terrorists killing people in a given area - the ginger gang were all men! so no men allowed! fuck men and fuck the oppressive patriarchy - gingerism is a peaceful and misunderstood way of life!
/r/PussyPassDenied19/12/18 02:45 AM
141

I find it astonishing that it's socially acceptable there to discriminate against men but not against the north african/middle eastern races whom are obviously the people sexually assaulting the girls at the festivals - very particularly them too - men are 50% of the population, and the arabs/africans are, what, 5%? and essentially all of the people doing the rapes were that 5%, so surely it's more utilitarian to just prohibit those ones? but no! apparently in Sweden, men are all to blame for th…
/r/PussyPassDenied19/12/18 01:50 AM
6

who elects these fucking nutcases? I remember when my student union held a referendum on whether to ban our local campus night club playing the song "robin thicke: blurred lines" (because it objectifies women and yada yada yada), and the student body actually voted against that motion, and then they banned it anyway!
/r/PussyPassDenied26/10/18 01:37 AM
114

I was going to say exactly the same thing - imagine if a male teacher who statutorily raped a student was called "smoking hot"
/r/PussyPassDenied22/10/18 03:17 PM
1

where is it implied that she has daddy issues? just because she deleted it? but by that point you already made the allegation...?
/r/PussyPassDenied17/10/18 11:21 PM
1

link?
/r/PussyPassDenied17/10/18 12:26 AM
-1

link?
/r/PussyPassDenied16/10/18 02:20 PM
-1

is this on youtube?
/r/PussyPassDenied16/10/18 02:02 PM
7

stop hitting yourself! stop hitting yourself!
/r/PussyPassDenied05/10/18 08:50 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter