~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | Implications of realistic sex robots/androidsIt's 100% a positive development. Since I believe in sexual freedom, I think sex bots will be important to keep some people who can't get sex easily , satisfied. Then again I sometimes doubt sex bots will be much different than porn. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/09/17 08:23 AM |
| 15 | Implications of realistic sex robots/androidsWhy would women want them to be illegal? Most women have accepted porn by now, a lot even watch it. I doubt sex bots will be any different. A few feminists disliking the idea of sex bots doesn't mean that all women think like this. I personally can't wait and I believe that sex bots will be important in order to ensure some order in a society with sexual freedom. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/09/17 08:21 AM |
| 1 | Let's be honest about the historical oppression of women's sexuality. What was it for? And what is its relevance to today?Perhaps they did. The result was the same regardless. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/08/17 04:52 PM |
| 1 | Let's be honest about the historical oppression of women's sexuality. What was it for? And what is its relevance to today?nah, i'm pretty it was the men who hoarded up the resources that were polygynous were the ones who created the patriarchy. Why would they do that when it wouldn't benefit them. The patriarchy was monogamous. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/08/17 03:59 PM |
| 1 | PPD and Kids! Are they an extension of their parent? Are kids sacrificed for or are they a continuation of the self? Why have them at all?Do you think having kids is morally good, neutral, or bad(even evil)? It's neutral. Are kids an extension of their parents? Always part of their parents, owned by their parents, or in debt to their parents? Kids should not be owned by their parents. In fact in my ideal system the kids would be raised by the commune as a whole. I think it would help them become more independent. Why should you personally or anyone have kids at all? Because they want to and because it brings them happiness. Or bec… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/08/17 04:39 AM |
| 1 | What do you think of people who have low or no interest in sex at all?I'm not asexual but I'm not interested in sex really. I think it's overrated. I wonder if I'm missing something. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/08/17 04:36 AM |
| 1 | Q4ALL Are /r/theredpill users generally low-status men? If so does this help explain their overt hostility towards women?Who are the hot women who are genuine misandrists? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/08/17 05:34 AM |
| 1 | Q4ALL Are /r/theredpill users generally low-status men? If so does this help explain their overt hostility towards women?18% for social scientists is not high. The majority of social scientists are not marxists. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/08/17 05:33 AM |
| 1 | Q4ALL Are /r/theredpill users generally low-status men? If so does this help explain their overt hostility towards women?Ah sorry, wrong comment. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/08/17 08:46 PM |
| 1 | A short personal opinion survey1) Yes 2)Yes 3)Depends. 4) Mostly agree. 5) Technically yes 6) Yes 7) What do you mean with that? 8) Mostly agree 9) Mostly agree. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/08/17 08:22 PM |
| 1 | Q4ALL Are /r/theredpill users generally low-status men? If so does this help explain their overt hostility towards women?Eh, I was just talking about what i have noticed with people who are actually misandrist. Didn't mean feminists in general are ugly. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/08/17 08:18 PM |
| 1 | Q4ALL Are /r/theredpill users generally low-status men? If so does this help explain their overt hostility towards women?Meh, is there proof most of the hateful MGTOW are high status? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/08/17 08:13 PM |
| 2 | TIME: "Study Finds That Men Who Attack Women Online Are, Literally, Losers"We have had multiple threads about this. In fact there was a thread about this today. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/08/17 06:49 PM |
| 2 | Q4ALL Are /r/theredpill users generally low-status men? If so does this help explain their overt hostility towards women?MGTOW are Red Pillers though. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/08/17 05:05 PM |
| 1 | Q4ALL Are /r/theredpill users generally low-status men? If so does this help explain their overt hostility towards women?They aren't marxists. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/08/17 05:04 PM |
| 5 | Q4ALL Are /r/theredpill users generally low-status men? If so does this help explain their overt hostility towards women?I don't see why a high status man would "hate" women. Sure, a high status man might have problems with individual women, but being hostile towards all women in general is something only someone low status would do imo. The same is true with misandrists. If you notice radical feminists who are misandrist are usually low status. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/08/17 05:02 PM |
| 1 | Q4All: Google Manifesto - What is your opinion about Google's move in firing the author?It is because of capitalism that they can fire people like that. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/08/17 04:09 PM |
| 1 | Q4All: Google Manifesto - What is your opinion about Google's move in firing the author?How? They're free to fire their employees for whatever reason according to your ideology. Didn't you say you were ancap? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/08/17 03:17 PM |
| 1 | Q4All: Google Manifesto - What is your opinion about Google's move in firing the author?Who knows. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/08/17 05:56 AM |
| 1 | Q4All: Google Manifesto - What is your opinion about Google's move in firing the author?but I am rightly outraged by the fact that if someone from the left did something equivalent they would at worst get a slap on the wrist Back in the day you could easily get fired for being communist. I'm sure if he wrote a manifesto calling for a revolution to seize the means of production, they would fire him too. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/08/17 03:59 AM |
| 4 | Why Do Posters Here Think Men Have Low Expectations?He wants her to have a low N count? He is insecure (and because keeping it in her pants in her youth is somegow impossible?) He wants sex? Men, you are not entitled to sex. If she doesn't want to sleep with you despite committing to you, too bad. Just be grateful for the starfish sex you get every now and then. He likes feminine women who are somewhat submissive? He is oppressing her by expecting her to fulfill some gender role. Perhaps you need to get away from reddit and feminist circles. In m… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/08/17 03:53 AM |
| 1 | Q4All: Google Manifesto - What is your opinion about Google's move in firing the author?Capitalism in action. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/08/17 03:49 AM |
| 3 | Q4All: Google Manifesto - What is your opinion about Google's move in firing the author?You could always get fired for your opinions, nothing new. In the 50s, they would fire you for being communist. Now they fire you for being non-PC. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/08/17 03:46 AM |
| 1 | Q4All: Google Manifesto - What is your opinion about Google's move in firing the author?I'm glad that at least you're consistent with your ideology. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/08/17 03:44 AM |
| 1 | Can you describe a RP, BP, and PP relationship?There are no such things. RP is someone who believes in the interpretation of TRP about male and female nature. BP and PP people have some disagreements with that. I don't believe there are RP and BP relationships. You can find people with BP ideas in a relationship that TRPillers define as "RP relationship" and vice versa. TRPillers tend to recommend a specific type of relationship in their sub as part of male strategy, but I don't believe followwing a specific strategy has anything to do with … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/08/17 06:00 PM |
| 2 | Women: Do you think most men don't deserve to be with you?It's not a matter of who deserves what. I am just not attracted to certain people. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/08/17 10:35 AM |
| 2 | What do you think of the common RPW advice to STFU?I can see some ways where this can be useful, to avoid nagging etc., but meh. Personally, I never fight with my partner and if I ever reach the point where I have to actively supress myself in order to avoid fighting, I will probably break up. Then again a lot of RPW are married so they don't have that option so easily. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/08/17 08:53 AM |
| 1 | How I know if a dating culture is out of whack.I am pretty sure having premarital sex is common in places like Russia , Ukraine and most of Central Europe. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/08/17 08:49 AM |
| 1 | Society Would Not Function Without The BluepillGreece is already gone so I don't give a damn. Capitalism has done more damage to my country than immigration. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/08/17 08:45 AM |
| 1 | Society Would Not Function Without The BluepillThe average worker doesn't caere about "civilization" whatever that means, btu about making ends meet. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/08/17 08:44 AM |
| 1 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnNo evidence? So you're just going to ignore the fact that they successfully overtook the last 60 out of 61 counties they mass emigrated to and replaced the native population via out reproducing? Like what? They didn't migrate, they conquered them in most cases. Or there was a civil war in the case of Lebanon. Men overwhelming vote on a more conservative guidelines and so do married women. "Conservative" does not necessarily translate to limiting immigration. Merkel is moderately conservative. Th… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/08/17 08:41 AM |
| 1 | Society Would Not Function Without The BluepillCommunism. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/08/17 08:40 AM |
| 2 | Let's be honest about the historical oppression of women's sexuality. What was it for? And what is its relevance to today?When agriculture was invented, some men started hoarding a lot of resources and polygyny sky-rocketed. The patriarchy was created in order to combat that. https://psmag.com/environment/17-to-1-reproductive-success Another member of the research team, a biological anthropologist, hypothesizes that somehow, only a few men accumulated lots of wealth and power, leaving nothing for others. These men could then pass their wealth on to their sons, perpetuating this pattern of elitist reproductive succe… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/08/17 09:50 AM |
| 2 | Society Would Not Function Without The BluepillI never said it was natural. You are a Red Piller. You should be believing it's natural. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/08/17 09:43 AM |
| 1 | People are reluctant to accept biological differences between the genders because they don't want people to use them to justify discrimination. How would you address this issue?Sure, I am not arguing against that. Irrelevant to our discussion though. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/08/17 09:41 AM |
| 2 | Society Would Not Function Without The BluepillWell the matriarchal societies we have today haven't progressed much beyond farming. We don't live in a "matriarchal" society. Also, many patriarchal societies are also backwar hellholes. I think nobody is arguing that we should live in a "matriarchal" society. The point is to live in an egalitarian, free society. While I don't believe any modern western nation is a patriarchal society, how many women would be willing to give up the benefits of modern living just to stick it to the man for past … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/08/17 09:40 AM |
| 2 | Society Would Not Function Without The BluepillWhat? What you said has literally nothing to do with what I said. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/08/17 09:36 AM |
| 2 | Society Would Not Function Without The BluepillPeople having certain sexual preferences is not an injustice or something to be ashamed of. But see, those men are only "unattractive" due to hypergamy. Like I said, 5\10 women could reject 7\10 men because they think they're better than them, when they really arent. They're "genuinely attraacted" to the 7\10, but they'd assuredly reject any man below 6\10. Hypergamy is natural to women according to your own worldview, it can't just go away. The only thing you can do is restrict it through force… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/08/17 06:37 PM |
| 1 | People are reluctant to accept biological differences between the genders because they don't want people to use them to justify discrimination. How would you address this issue?I truly don't understand people who have this worldview. "People are suffering and they're not free." "Yes but....liberty for rich people to be racist and sexist is more important!" | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/08/17 06:27 PM |
| 0 | People are reluctant to accept biological differences between the genders because they don't want people to use them to justify discrimination. How would you address this issue?That's because they view men as unfairly social dominant. (not that I agree with affirmative actions etc.) | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/08/17 06:24 PM |
| 3 | Society Would Not Function Without The BluepillTrue and don't forget automation that is predicted to become a huge thing in the future. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/08/17 06:18 PM |
| 2 | The three waves of feminism: quick reference guideFirst of all, this is historically inaccurate. Second of all, "cultural marxism" is a conspiracy theory. | /r/MensRights | 06/08/17 06:04 PM |
| 1 | People are reluctant to accept biological differences between the genders because they don't want people to use them to justify discrimination. How would you address this issue?Are you saying that discrimination based on gender never happens? There have been experiments that show otherwise. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/08/17 05:40 PM |
| 2 | Society Would Not Function Without The BluepillYes women are naturally attracted to men who are superior in some way, or at least very attractive. How is that an injustice? Women can't force themselves to be attracted to men who are just unattractive to them. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/08/17 05:17 PM |
| 3 | Society Would Not Function Without The BluepillIn this case, women. You'd have to explain hypergamy to women, and then appeal to their sense of justice and self awareness. Are you saying that women having sex with men they're actually attracted to is an "injustice"? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/08/17 05:13 PM |
| 1 | People are reluctant to accept biological differences between the genders because they don't want people to use them to justify discrimination. How would you address this issue?I bet unemployed women would care. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/08/17 05:09 PM |
| 1 | People are reluctant to accept biological differences between the genders because they don't want people to use them to justify discrimination. How would you address this issue?It doesn't matter. It clearly shows discriminatory attitude. Besides how is it possible to believe that female suffrage was a mistake and not want to take women's rights away? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/08/17 05:08 PM |
| 2 | Society Would Not Function Without The BluepillSure, if that's what they want to do. How are you going to achieve that without supressing people though? Imo, we shoul just leave people to follow the path they want, without pressure from either feminists or tradcons. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/08/17 05:01 PM |
| 2 | Barring sex, what are the benefits of a relationship that you don't feel you could ever get through family and close friends?Personally nothing. I consider my boyfriend to be also my close friend and my family. I am 22, female and I support the basic RP ideas, without the tradcon and anti-female elements. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/08/17 04:54 PM |
| 1 | Society Would Not Function Without The BluepillMen don't have to be wage slaves. It's the economic system that forces them to be. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/08/17 04:49 PM |
| 2 | Society Would Not Function Without The BluepillYou are just making too many assumptions based on 0 evidence. You are saying patriarchal societies are better, yet we see with current patriarchal societies that this is not true. You are saying that we would have progressed even more if we were patriarchal, yet you can't base it on any evidence. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/08/17 04:33 PM |
| 2 | Society Would Not Function Without The BluepillThen just don't get married lol. I am 100% with those who say that marriage sucks. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/08/17 04:31 PM |
| 5 | Society Would Not Function Without The BluepillThat's not the fault of no fault divorce, that's the fault of how alimony and child custody work, as well as how the economic system in general works. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/08/17 04:25 PM |
| 2 | Society Would Not Function Without The BluepillIt's not feminism's fault that the US debt exists. (not that I support feminism, but this is just ridiculous) If you think patriarchal societies are so great, how come most existing patriarchal societies tend to be pretty bad? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/08/17 04:24 PM |
| 2 | Society Would Not Function Without The BluepillHow? Feminized societies surely have flaws but they are still among the best places to live in. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/08/17 04:20 PM |
| 3 | Society Would Not Function Without The BluepillRemoving the incentive of economic protection= no need for marriage to exist. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/08/17 04:14 PM |
| 3 | Society Would Not Function Without The BluepillI don't care about preserving civilization like it is. I believe marriage won't be needed in the economic system that I want. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/08/17 04:13 PM |
| 2 | Society Would Not Function Without The BluepillThere is no decline. Lol. You are an American, you live in the most influential country in the world. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/08/17 04:06 PM |
| 5 | Society Would Not Function Without The BluepillYes, I got downvoted. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/08/17 03:59 PM |
| 0 | People are reluctant to accept biological differences between the genders because they don't want people to use them to justify discrimination. How would you address this issue?There are some people that are actual racists and sexists. I am not talking about those who think there are generally some differences between the genders. There are people who seriously believe that women are subhuman and that hispanics are going to destroy the US and that blacks are violent animals. I don't know how you can be aware of RP culture and don't see that genuine sexists and racists definitely exist. Outside of reddit, RP is almost synonymous with white nationalism. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/08/17 03:59 PM |
| 1 | People are reluctant to accept biological differences between the genders because they don't want people to use them to justify discrimination. How would you address this issue?If you were in danger of getting underestimated and undermined and not getting hired because of your race or gender, you would probably see it differently. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/08/17 03:51 PM |
| 0 | People are reluctant to accept biological differences between the genders because they don't want people to use them to justify discrimination. How would you address this issue?I said no such thing, I am pretty sure I explicitly said I don't want scientific research to be supressed. However, it's going to promote discrimination, that's for sure. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/08/17 03:49 PM |
| 3 | Society Would Not Function Without The BluepillHow do you define "function"? A lot of patriarchal societies nowadays are total shitholes and a lot of "feminized" societies are the best places to live in. But they function. They're not as bad as "free sexual market" in the long run. How are they not that bad? They are horrible and they need oppressive measures to be sustained. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/08/17 03:48 PM |
| 2 | People are reluctant to accept biological differences between the genders because they don't want people to use them to justify discrimination. How would you address this issue?And how will accepting biological differences encourage discrimination? Really now? They can easily be misrepresented and used to justify all sort of biases. Look at how many RPillers say that "women shouldn't vote". It clearly shows that this type of thinking can lead to discrimination. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/08/17 03:38 PM |
| 1 | People are reluctant to accept biological differences between the genders because they don't want people to use them to justify discrimination. How would you address this issue?Yes, but nobody here advocates that. I simply said that this is why some people outside of here are against it and how you would address their very valid concerns. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/08/17 03:29 PM |
| 0 | Society Would Not Function Without The BluepillMale superiority, or generally "Patriarchal" societies are the most successful. Citation needed. The USA is less patriarchal than Bangladesh , yet I doubt you want to argue the USA is less successful than Bangladesh. The way western society is right now, with female sexual liberation, is we've returned to harems. All (80%) the women competing for the very best men (top 20%), these men having access to multiple women (side-chicks, etc), while the rest of the 80% of men struggle.. How is that a pr… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/08/17 03:26 PM |
| 6 | Society Would Not Function Without The BluepillBlue pill men are not needed unless you want to preserve the current wage slavery system. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/08/17 03:25 PM |
| 2 | Society Would Not Function Without The BluepillThe Blue Pill is needed in order to defend marriage, that's all. I am personally against marriage as an institution because I think it's based on lies, manipulation, societal and economic pressure and sexual repression. Since I don't care about marriage or preserving the institutions that make marriage so important, I don't think TRP is inherently dangerous. (well, maybe TRP is, because it's kind of an echo-chamber, but the RP as an idea is pretty interesting) | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/08/17 03:24 PM |
| 2 | Society Would Not Function Without The BluepillDetrimental to who? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/08/17 03:23 PM |
| 1 | People are reluctant to accept biological differences between the genders because they don't want people to use them to justify discrimination. How would you address this issue?Who said reality and data should be supressed? That's right, nobody said it here. Are you just making stuff up now? Like it or not, this is a serious issue for some and has the potential to actually affect their lives. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/08/17 03:15 PM |
| 0 | People are reluctant to accept biological differences between the genders because they don't want people to use them to justify discrimination. How would you address this issue?Except that I never said that. Touchy much? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/08/17 03:06 PM |
| 1 | People are reluctant to accept biological differences between the genders because they don't want people to use them to justify discrimination. How would you address this issue?That's the reason why women get lower sentences for the same crimes as men. Wouldn't you say that's unfair? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/08/17 03:06 PM |
| 1 | People are reluctant to accept biological differences between the genders because they don't want people to use them to justify discrimination. How would you address this issue?Easy for you to say when you are not the one in danger of being underestimated on gender basis. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/08/17 03:05 PM |
| 0 | People are reluctant to accept biological differences between the genders because they don't want people to use them to justify discrimination. How would you address this issue?Did I ever say such a thing? Lol, I simply asked how you would address this. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/08/17 03:02 PM |
| 1 | People are reluctant to accept biological differences between the genders because they don't want people to use them to justify discrimination. How would you address this issue?That makes no sense, why would they "underperform in the market"? Unless you want to argue that consumers are going to prefer companies that encourage diversity. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/08/17 01:30 PM |
| 2 | People are reluctant to accept biological differences between the genders because they don't want people to use them to justify discrimination. How would you address this issue?http://www.pnas.org/content/109/41/16474.abstract I found this one with a quick search. Also, this: http://www.news.com.au/finance/work/careers/the-same-resume-with-different-names-nets-different-results/news-story/a2a182fb4570e948c27ce63139ee66b1 | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/08/17 01:19 PM |
| 1 | Manosphere ContradictionHe seems to just be against MRAs in general though. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/08/17 01:12 PM |
| 1 | Manosphere ContradictionShe is sympathetic to TRP, but you can be MRA and still be against TRP sub for a variety of reasons. It has nothing to do with not caring about men. There are reasons to be against TRP other than "I hate men, I am a feminist". | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/08/17 11:20 AM |
| 4 | People are reluctant to accept biological differences between the genders because they don't want people to use them to justify discrimination. How would you address this issue?Yes, yes, but that doesn't mean discrimination should be encouraged. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/08/17 11:18 AM |
| 4 | People are reluctant to accept biological differences between the genders because they don't want people to use them to justify discrimination. How would you address this issue?Second, I guess you've shown your hand about what you think will happen huh. Trying to stack the deck with a trick question, one you already read the "answer" to previously? Why ask then? Show how smart you are? I asked how you would address this issue since the beginning. What are you talking about? The other day there was a guy here who explicitly admitted that he doesn't hire women for being women btw. It's not fortune telling, I just think it will happen. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/08/17 06:52 AM |
| 6 | People are reluctant to accept biological differences between the genders because they don't want people to use them to justify discrimination. How would you address this issue?It's not like they would openly say they don't hire women. They would just find another excuse. Things like this are already happening. For example there are studies that indicate they are less likely to hire women even if the resumes are the same. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/08/17 06:22 AM |
| 7 | People are reluctant to accept biological differences between the genders because they don't want people to use them to justify discrimination. How would you address this issue?No, I think it's still a legitimate concern. For example many would use to justify their biases and not hire women on a gender basis. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/08/17 06:08 AM |
| 5 | People are reluctant to accept biological differences between the genders because they don't want people to use them to justify discrimination. How would you address this issue?http://stanmed.stanford.edu/2017spring/how-mens-and-womens-brains-are-different.html Studies are being done about this. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/08/17 06:05 AM |
| 2 | About Michelle Carter... some questions mainly for men. If you aren't a man and decide to answer, please note that in your reply.She's not ugly, she just needs to change her hair and the shape of her eyebrows. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/08/17 04:29 AM |
| 3 | Manosphere ContradictionThe MRAs are ok with women so you could try getting involved with them. MGTOW literally think all women are pure evil, so no reason to bother with them. A lot of RPillers fall into the MGTOW territory. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/08/17 04:23 AM |
| 1 | Manosphere ContradictionWhat did Rollo say about GWW? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/08/17 04:11 AM |
| 3 | Men's SMV actually peaks at 28, young women dating significantly older men is usually BBWomen in their early twenties these days are generally insufferably solipsistic, immature, and almost completely unable to be meaningfully introspective, and are thus not particularly attractive to men in their 40s whom women find attractive for anything but occasional sex - and even then it's typically not great because great sex is about creating spiritual union and solipsism is a significant barrier to that. Ahahahaha, you people will just say anything to rationalize it. Women are sexually at… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/08/17 04:07 AM |
| 1 | Why do opinions and jokes sometimes be held in such a high regard, to be cared about?Oh yes, the JQ. You mean that Jews are both all communists and greedy capitalist bankers. It makes perfect sense, right? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/08/17 04:06 AM |
| 2 | Men's SMV actually peaks at 28, young women dating significantly older men is usually BBno one is saying it's the norm for 38+ men to be dating 20yo hotties If it's not the norm then how can you say men's SMV peaks at 38? I just don't get it. 38 yo men are way more likely to date women in their 30s, than 20 yo women. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/08/17 04:04 AM |
| 2 | Men's SMV actually peaks at 28, young women dating significantly older men is usually BBMy experience is that it's quite rare to see women in their early 20s dating 40 years olds. It seems like our experiences have been different. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/08/17 05:20 PM |
| 1 | Why do opinions and jokes sometimes be held in such a high regard, to be cared about?Take personal responsibility, just like most mature people do when they realize they can't say whatever they want, whenever they want. Think before they speak. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/08/17 04:52 PM |
| 1 | Why do opinions and jokes sometimes be held in such a high regard, to be cared about?I don't know what you expect me to answer. I am against legal action in most cases, I already told you. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/08/17 04:46 PM |
| 1 | Why do opinions and jokes sometimes be held in such a high regard, to be cared about?Well, we communists have found the trick. We don't directly advocate for a violent revolution, we just believe it's inevitable. You know "Me? I don't advocate for a violent revolution. I just think it's inevitable. Workers are going to revolt. Nothing you can do about it." The results are the same and we don't get persecuted for directly promoting violence. I promote communism because I want it to happen. If I didn't, it would surely be irresponsible of me to directly promote it so much. In gene… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/08/17 04:43 PM |
| 3 | Men's SMV actually peaks at 28, young women dating significantly older men is usually BBI don't understand your point. If you agree that 20 yo women dating 40 yo men is not that common, then surely it makes sense that male SMV does not peak at 38. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/08/17 04:38 PM |
| 1 | Why do opinions and jokes sometimes be held in such a high regard, to be cared about?Take personal responsibility with what they say. Everyone should behave and speak responsibly in a civilized society. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/08/17 04:33 PM |
| 1 | Why do opinions and jokes sometimes be held in such a high regard, to be cared about?My dude, if someone feels attracted to nazi-ism, it's because they've had nazi views for a while. And how did they have Nazi views in the first place? Did the Nazi views fall from the sky? They were influenced by someone, that's how they obtained Nazi views. You know, with words. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/08/17 04:32 PM |
| 1 | Why do opinions and jokes sometimes be held in such a high regard, to be cared about?A lot of them are white nationalists, which isn't far from Nazism, especially considering their obsession with the JQ. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/08/17 04:30 PM |
| 1 | Why do opinions and jokes sometimes be held in such a high regard, to be cared about?For example if you verbally bully someone, you cause them harm. Should there be "legal action"? In most cases no. But you still caused a consequence, harming someone. Whether you give a shit or not about the consequences of your words, is another issue. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/08/17 04:28 PM |
| 2 | Why do opinions and jokes sometimes be held in such a high regard, to be cared about?It seems like what YOU'RE saying is absolving someone of their responsibility for what they did. Bla blah blah, complete strawman. Yes people are responsible both for what they say and want they do. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/08/17 04:26 PM |
| 1 | Why do opinions and jokes sometimes be held in such a high regard, to be cared about?People are responsible for their actions, just like people are responsible for what they say. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/08/17 04:24 PM |
| 2 | Why do opinions and jokes sometimes be held in such a high regard, to be cared about?I don't care about the state, I would take actions to minimize state influence if I could. I just believe people should speak responsibly, that's all. You can't just say whatever you want and act like you can never do anything wrong. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/08/17 04:23 PM |
| 2 | Why do opinions and jokes sometimes be held in such a high regard, to be cared about?It helps normalizing Nazis and attracting new people to Nazism. Do you think Nazis were born that way? Of course not. They were usually influenced by someone. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/08/17 04:22 PM |
| 2 | Why do opinions and jokes sometimes be held in such a high regard, to be cared about?I disagree. I believe people should be responsible with what they say. I wouldn't support legal action in most cases as I don't trust the state in general, but people should be aware of some things, like that yes words can have consequences. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/08/17 04:20 PM |
| 2 | Why do opinions and jokes sometimes be held in such a high regard, to be cared about?Complete strawman, I never said that. I said that people should be responsible. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/08/17 04:19 PM |
| 1 | Why do opinions and jokes sometimes be held in such a high regard, to be cared about?If it was true, it wouldn't be pseudoscience. Pseudoscience is usually based on misrepresenting actual science. People sometimes do that for political gain, like the Nazis did or like some extreme SJWs do. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/08/17 04:17 PM |
| 2 | Why do opinions and jokes sometimes be held in such a high regard, to be cared about?I meant that they can cause unintended or intended consequences, not that they should face legal action. Speech can be used for evil that's for sure and it can inspire all sort of reactions. There are some cases where I think legal action against them would be fair though, like if they seriously try to cause violence. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/08/17 04:11 PM |
| 2 | Why do opinions and jokes sometimes be held in such a high regard, to be cared about?To understand that they should speak responsibly and be aware of the fact that you can't just say whatever you want and never expect consequences. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/08/17 04:06 PM |
| 1 | Are we (RP) a bit hypocritical for judging AF/BB?Look at my recent thread. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/08/17 04:05 PM |
| 2 | Why do opinions and jokes sometimes be held in such a high regard, to be cared about?I don't want to actively supress speech personally. I just think people should take responsibility for their speech. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/08/17 03:59 PM |
| 3 | Men's SMV actually peaks at 28, young women dating significantly older men is usually BBDo you know many 20 yo women who date 40 yo men? Because I don't. I date someone who is 38 and everyone in my age that I know considers it weird. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/08/17 03:57 PM |
| 2 | Men's SMV actually peaks at 28, young women dating significantly older men is usually BBIf women were sexually attracted to money, BB wouldn't be a thing. Doesn't TRP say that women are not genuinely sexually attracted to BB, just want to use him? How do you explain that women in their early 20s rarely date 40 yo men? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/08/17 03:55 PM |
| 2 | Why do opinions and jokes sometimes be held in such a high regard, to be cared about?Ok, what if that person said "White men are genetically subhuman, dangerous, evil , threatening and irredeemable, I cite X,Y pseudoscience to prove it" and this speech inspired someone to kill some white men. Does the first person hold any responsibility whatsoever in that case? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/08/17 01:20 PM |
| 3 | Why do opinions and jokes sometimes be held in such a high regard, to be cared about?That sounds like a way to absolve people from any responsibility of what they say. If someone says "Kill all white men" and someone else gets inspired by him and proceeds to kill some white men, does the first person have no responsibility? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/08/17 01:05 PM |
| 4 | Men's SMV actually peaks at 28, young women dating significantly older men is usually BBYes, I didn't say all relationships like that are BB. I am 22 and I date someone significantly older too. It's just that in my experiences relationships like that are quite rare and are viewed as weird. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/08/17 11:59 AM |
| 2 | Why do opinions and jokes sometimes be held in such a high regard, to be cared about?Why don't you go to /pol/ yourself and hang around a little? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/08/17 09:36 AM |
| 2 | Why do opinions and jokes sometimes be held in such a high regard, to be cared about?Ok lets say people are stupid. Your point is? It doesn't change the fact that words can have unintented consequences, therefore I think people should be responsible with what they say. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/08/17 09:15 AM |
| 6 | Why do opinions and jokes sometimes be held in such a high regard, to be cared about?When will people realize that sometimes words can have consequences? Do you think you can say whatever the hell you want and that there will never be any consequences? I will give you an example. At 4chan /pol/ they started glorifying Nazis as a joke at first, until eventually they started attracting actual neo-Nazis. It was a joke until it became not so much of a joke. Do you really not understand that there are cases where even "jokes" can have consequences? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/08/17 08:12 AM |
| 2 | Men's SMV actually peaks at 28, young women dating significantly older men is usually BBIt means that this is the age where men and women have comparable sexual attractiveness, however it makes no sense. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/08/17 07:09 AM |
| 2 | Men's SMV actually peaks at 28, young women dating significantly older men is usually BBThe "comparative SMV" at 30 is weird as hell. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/08/17 06:49 AM |
| 5 | Are we (RP) a bit hypocritical for judging AF/BB?I probably knoww the sidebar even better than you. Do you realize that I don't have to agree with every single thing mentioned in the sidebar? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/08/17 06:47 AM |
| 4 | Are we (RP) a bit hypocritical for judging AF/BB?You missed the point. TRP argues that peak SMV for men is 38. That's false. Peak SMV for men is actually around 28.In my experience 18-22 yo women usually date men who are in their late 20s. I am 22 and I date a man who is 38. Everyone thinks it's weird and they wonder why I am with him. Young women dating men over 35 is rare. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/08/17 06:05 AM |
| 1 | Q4 All: how old were you when you lost your virginity? (Gender and pill please)I was 16 or 17. Woman. Basic RP, but can't stand TRP subs. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/08/17 05:30 AM |
| 2 | Men's SMV actually peaks at 28, young women dating significantly older men is usually BBThese days, a consensus of neuroscientists agree that brain development likely persists until at least the mid-20s – possibly until the 30s. http://mentalhealthdaily.com/2015/02/18/at-what-age-is-the-brain-fully-developed/ It looks like my estimation was right. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/08/17 04:57 AM |
| 3 | Men's SMV actually peaks at 28, young women dating significantly older men is usually BBEven though research points to them finishing maturing around 22ish? Well, in my experience a lot of guys at 22 are still quite immature, especially nowadays. Also, can I see that research? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/08/17 04:51 AM |
| 4 | Men's SMV actually peaks at 28, young women dating significantly older men is usually BBMen under 28 are often immature. Also, there are some cases where a man can continue to grow in height until he is 25. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/08/17 04:48 AM |
| 7 | Are we (RP) a bit hypocritical for judging AF/BB?"hmmm, I think I'll go get a 18-23 year old with an n-count of less than 4". Lets be honest, they can't really pull it off. Young women rarely date 35+ years old men. I date someone who is significantly older than me and everyone thinks it's weird and creepy unfortunately. In general, 35+ yo men dating 20 years old women is rare as hell. It mainly happens if the man is rich or if the woman somehow has a fetish for older men, like I do. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/08/17 04:26 AM |
| 3 | Single mothers often marry attractive alpha menTRPillers sometimes act like "alphas" are the ones who follow certain rules, like "never marry a single mother" and "never get married in general". That's obviously nonsense. Even if never getting married is a good strategy for men, it doesn't mean that all "alphas" follow this strategy. I mention this because people call Macron beta just because he married someone older than him. That's absurd. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/08/17 04:24 AM |
| 1 | Q4W: Most men here think women can get any guy they want with no effort, women, what are your views on this?Topic starter said that women can get "any man they want", implying that could include anyone. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/08/17 02:08 PM |
| 3 | Q4W: Most men here think women can get any guy they want with no effort, women, what are your views on this?It's not true either way. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/08/17 01:18 PM |
| 1 | Q4W: Most men here think women can get any guy they want with no effort, women, what are your views on this?Everybody must put effort into their appearance, but only men have to put effort to get the women they want. That is obviously untrue. A lot of women have to take care of their appearance to get with the men they want. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/08/17 09:20 AM |
| 4 | Q4W: Most men here think women can get any guy they want with no effort, women, what are your views on this?I was responding to the title. If women lowered their standards enough, they could get laid, but to be fair that's irrelevant because , unlike men, most women don't care about getting laid just for the sake of getting laid. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/08/17 07:02 AM |
| 3 | Q4W: Most men here think women can get any guy they want with no effort, women, what are your views on this?The OP says that women can get "any" guy with no effort. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/08/17 06:59 AM |
| 7 | Q4W: Most men here think women can get any guy they want with no effort, women, what are your views on this?Definitely not true. I know women who have been rejected. I know women who are too "ugly" to get anywhere near the man they want. Ask yourself this? Would all men have sex with all women, including the ugly ones, the obese ones, the ones with STDs? If the answer is no, then it's clearly that women cannot get any guy they want with no effort. Edit: >How do you feel about these views? Does it change your perception of the men here? No. >Do you feel you need to put effort into your appearance? Do y… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/08/17 06:56 AM |
| 1 | Have you ever been accused of being a "nice guy" or a "nice girl"? If so, do you think it was warranted?I quite like taking care of my family, friends and my boyfriend, but never to the extend where they would call me a "nice girl". I never really expected to be rewarded for helping out others, I mostly did it because I get a kick out of it. If I feel I am being seriously taken advantage of, I usually just leave. I admit that in my teens I was a bit of a doormat at times, but not anymore. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/08/17 05:38 AM |
| 2 | Feminism doesn't want to overturn the patriarchyAll things that feminism is against. Citation needed. I am not a feminist but I have never seen feminists being against male victims of DV, women asking out men etc. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/08/17 04:10 AM |
| 1 | Feminism doesn't want to overturn the patriarchyI will be satisfied as long as men and women have equal rights. I don't know what the "patriarchy" means in the context you described. In my country men and women don't have equal rights because mandatory military service exists. Once we abolish the legal slavery for men, I won't care about feminism anymore as, in my view, "egalitarianism" can't exist in the current system of capitalism anyway. People who try to push for affirmative action etc. are misguided imo. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/08/17 04:05 AM |
| 5 | Aren't understanding the opposite sex and caring about the opposite sex two separate things?Men want power over others. This is inherently antagonistic since nobody wants to cede power. According to that logic, men are antagonistic with each other too, so the gendered issue is irrelevant. Men want multiple women, women don't want to members of a harem. Some women wouldn't mind and most men don't really have a problem with monogamy as long as they could get enough sex. Women want the top men, they don't want to share them. They don't want to share the top men you mean? Doesn't that have… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/08/17 09:47 PM |
| 0 | Aren't understanding the opposite sex and caring about the opposite sex two separate things?Why is the relationship between the sexes antagonistic? The only inherent antagonism I see is between women and men who lack the social skills and appearance to get laid on their own. Men and women can get along just fine, other than that. What "antagonism" is there? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/08/17 09:39 PM |
| 1 | Alpha Males Do Not ExistIt's not that all men are equal. Nobody is equal. However TRP makes it seem liek strict hierarchies are inevitable and necessary. I doubt most leaders are born with specific traits that makes them "alpha" leaders. Even hunters-gatheres didn't have strict hierachies but only temporary ones. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/08/17 08:00 AM |
| 1 | Alpha Males Do Not ExistFascism has to be the most "cuck" ideology there is considering it's based on hero worshipping a leader who rules everyone else in a totalitarian way. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/08/17 07:58 AM |
| 2 | Alpha Males Do Not ExistMost people hate their boss and being told what to do. Even submissive people want boundaries. In general, hierarchies aren't meant to be strict, but temporary and I think very few people are naturally submissive. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/08/17 03:46 AM |
| 1 | Q4ALL: What is your experience dating someone with a mental illness?I have bipolar disorder and OCD and I date. It used to be a lot worse and it did affect my previous relationships. I remember getting out of control multiple times with my first boyfriend for example. Now it seems like things are little better in general. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/08/17 02:38 AM |
| 3 | Alpha Males Do Not ExistHunters-gatherers were often quite egalitarian. The RP often makes it seem like "strict" hierarchies are necessary and inevitable to humans, something I don't agree with. https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/freedom-learn/201105/how-hunter-gatherers-maintained-their-egalitarian-ways | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/08/17 02:29 AM |
| 4 | Alpha Males Do Not ExistHumans obviously are social animals with a social hierarchy. There are leaders, followers, elders, we even have shamans - spiritual leaders... No. Hunters-gatherers had only temporary leaders and other than that were more or less equal. Definitely not "strict" hierarchies. https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/freedom-learn/201105/how-hunter-gatherers-maintained-their-egalitarian-ways | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/08/17 02:26 AM |
| 3 | Who has higher self esteem and better self perceptions in general, men or women?In my experience, it's men on average that are more confident. It's just based on my experiences, I don't know if it's true in general. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 11:35 PM |
| 5 | What's the problem with older men (30-45) dating younger women (18-23)?Nothing. Some people think that the older men are inherently taking advantage of the younger women in this scenario, but that's obviously nonsense. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 11:28 PM |
| 1 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?Nobody will be forcing them to do anything so I don't understand what you're talking about. If anything it's capitalism that steals the fruits of people's labor. Most people don't want to be lazy and unproductive all their lives, the only people I have seen that just wanted to do absolutely nothing all the time, were mentally ill . The point is that if they don't want to work in communism they can't benefit from other people's work either, that's why they will be kicked out. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 11:21 PM |
| 1 | If women are hypergamous only going for the best. Are men not also hypergamous?In a way. I don't agree with everything they say though. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 11:14 PM |
| 1 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?How is that a violation of anyone's bodily autonomy? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 11:13 PM |
| 1 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?Ok, but I felt I had to defend my position since you made a thread to attack it. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 11:11 PM |
| 1 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?They will be free to have sex as long as they don't take away people's freedom. Rape is taking away people's freedom. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 11:10 PM |
| 1 | If women are hypergamous only going for the best. Are men not also hypergamous?I think women can "love" though. It's just that men tend to have fewer options therefore they fall in love much more easily. If you had a lot of options, you would probably have a similar mindset as women. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 01:00 PM |
| 1 | If women are hypergamous only going for the best. Are men not also hypergamous?What do you mean and why do you think I am wrong? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 12:50 PM |
| 2 | If women are hypergamous only going for the best. Are men not also hypergamous?There's no such thing as "love". It's a hormonal response people get when they feel sexually attracted to someone. Other than that, people can eventually develop familial love. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 12:47 PM |
| 0 | If women are hypergamous only going for the best. Are men not also hypergamous?N count doesn't affect attraction I think. Sluts can get laid all they want. It might affect the "sluts" chances of a relationship but that's another issue. For most women having sex with most men would lead to unsatisfying sex (no orgasm). I would go further than that and say that I believe it's more than just unsatisfactory sex. Having sex with men you're not attracetd to is an unpleasant experience that feels like a violation. I don't think men can relate though. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 12:18 PM |
| 1 | If women are hypergamous only going for the best. Are men not also hypergamous?Women lose attraction to men they view as inferior. Men don't lose attraction so easily and would generally have sex with most women without problems. For women having sex with most men would be pure torture as they're only attracted to men who they perceive as good genetic material. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 12:09 PM |
| 1 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?Weird. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 11:32 AM |
| 0 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?How am I a troll? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 11:29 AM |
| 0 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?Oh stop it. I had to make this thread because someone else made a thread about me. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 11:23 AM |
| 0 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?...You call me a victim of propaganda while citing countries that undoubtedly would have been bombarded with soviet propaganda... Yea just like you're bombarded with capitalist propaganda. People in Germany miss the Nazis, abused wives miss their husbands, collective stockholm syndrome combined with nostalgia goggles does not make for smart choices. I think the same way about the workers who support capitalism. Must be Stockholm syndrome to support the system based on your exploitation. The holo… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 09:08 AM |
| 0 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?Because things seem to be better, we don't have mass starvation or gulags. Lol, know the history of the 90s. Also, the famine in the USSR happened only during the first years, after a while there were no famines anymore. All things that existed under Soviet rule. No, it became way worse with the collapse of the USSR. So Russian and China only 'count' when you are making a point? Socialism and communism are not the same thing. Also, most people in Russia miss the USSR. A lot of people from former… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 08:57 AM |
| 0 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?Take your own research advice. You serious? I know what communism and socialism are better than you. So you're saying the holodomor didn't happen? Or the mass starvation/disappearances experienced in China? They did happen, but there were famines in these feudalist states all the time way before socialism. Heck, there have even been famines in capitalist states. You're acting as if socialism caused these famines and they didn't exist before. And yet Soviet politicians were shocked at the abundan… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 07:51 AM |
| 2 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?Incest is fine. Rape is not as it violates other people's freedom. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 07:35 AM |
| 0 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?It was No it wasn't. It was meant to be a step in order to eventually reach communism. You should really research more. It was socialist, not communist. and while things were bad before they got worse. They didn't get worse. The socialists eliminated illiteracy and raised the standards of living. You're ignorant on the subject and should research more. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rh-4gsDjAKg But you already said that either the betas can slave for your new utopia or fuck off into the woods..… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 07:35 AM |
| 3 | Why do people use the phrase "don't put the pussy on a pedestal" whenever a man compliments a woman?Ehh, some men tend to pedestalize women, that's true. It's not a good thing to see women are morally superior , fragile beings that always need protection and saving. However, I do think TRPillers sometimes take it too far in the other direction and act like viewing women as subhuman is the only way. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 07:29 AM |
| 1 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?its has persisted for so long because it works It doesn't work, there are capitalist crises all the time. If anything there has been incredible effort to save capitalism from itself. Mass graves and a large swathe of the planet 20 years behind. This wasn't communism and these countries were usually worse before socialism actually. China and Russia were feudalist states were people were dying all the time. Socialism improved their lives if anything. Sure it wasn't perfect, but better than before.… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 07:22 AM |
| 0 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?Alphas do. Not really. I know many alphas who hate capitalism. Its fair in the most basic sense in that ultimately smarts win out Not really. Sources? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunter-gatherer Go to the part about how hunters-gatherers societies were egalitarian and the resources were shared. I can already get plenty of whatever I want without it. Because capitalism is based on the permanent exploitation of a class of people and this class can eventually rise up and kill you. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 07:11 AM |
| 1 | Q4RP: How would you "fix" dating?Why would you want to return to the patriarchy? It seems to me like it was a shit system, that's why there was a transition to something else. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 07:00 AM |
| 1 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?Its very nature would give it a competitive edge and attract alphas and women. That's nonsense. Most people don't like the "competitive" nature of capitalism. It's more of a stressful experience for some. Besides capitalism is not a fair competition, it's rigged. You can't force that. If you were raised in a small commune all your life, you would see it that way. I've read studies in the past that basically state that humans for the most part only give a shit about immediate family(biological) a… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 06:56 AM |
| 1 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?Equal opportunity doesn't exist in capitalism. Some people are just born rich and inherit huge amounts of money and businesses from their families. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 06:53 AM |
| 2 | CMV: Sexual freedom already exists for men, and it doesn't make them more selectiveWell of course. It's not men's job to be selective, their job is to try to reproduce. Women are the ones who select the genes that improve our species. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 06:51 AM |
| 1 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?It's not all about the money. It's about perceived value. Money still obviously plays a part, therefore equal opportunity doesn't exist. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 06:49 AM |
| 1 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?Did you read my point? it was they go off and do something different ie not communism. What different? What about resentment? I don't think it will be much of a problem. In communism the commune will be like your family. Don't you want to take care of your family? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 06:48 AM |
| 1 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?It fucks your system though. No, it doesn't. As long as they keep the communist system, anything goes. What about the sick, disabled etc. They'd be a drain. The commune will take care of those that really can't work. That contradicts your earlier plan. They don't have to, it's just that a commune doesn't have to tolerate those who don't work. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 06:43 AM |
| 1 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?But you havent addressed my point, whats to stop them from overthrowing/luring away the women? How are they going to lure the women away? They will be able to work within communism to attract women. If they succeeed, so be it. They won't be overthrowing the system, that would seem ridiculous once we reach communism. Besides the other communes will stop them if they try to create a system of exploitation. Nobody said anything about that(showing your bias I see) but forcing a load of incels to liv… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 06:35 AM |
| 2 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?For example in capitalism, poor guys don't get the same opportunities to have sex as rich guys. That's not equal opportunity. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 06:30 AM |
| 2 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?The fact is betas are the one doing the bulk of production and invention, it'd be a bunch of alphas and their women in huts , while the betas work together to show up them/attract away their women with superior resources/comforts/new inventions. They will be able to work and invent as much as they like in the system that I propose, nobody will be stopping them . They will have equal opportunities to invent, work and reproduce, just like everyone else. you have already admitted it would make more… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 06:29 AM |
| 0 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?In communism, everyone will have equal opportunity to reproduce. There would be no poor people. It's just that there would be no equal outcomes. I still think it will be better for everyone. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 06:22 AM |
| 2 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?There is no equal opportunity in the current system. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 06:21 AM |
| 1 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?But they don't know that ahead of time, and betas aren't 100% shit for the most part. Oh come on, it's complete shit and marriage has always been base don manipulation and lies. I thought you people agreed on that. For starters their is more of them(as you say in another thread), secondly its dropping the pretense and just shoving in their face that they are slaves that can either raise other men's children or fuck off to the woods(real nice). They wouldn't be forced to raise kids if they don't … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 06:16 AM |
| 2 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?If they violate women, they will have to be punished. It's only normal. The purpose is everyone to have equal opportinities, not equal outcomes. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 06:14 AM |
| 1 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?Are you retarded? Earlier you basically said betas can make do with sex toys or fuck off to the woods. that's worse! How is it worse? Nowadays they usually don't get sex either and when they get marriage, it usually ends badly. I think it would be better for them. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 06:04 AM |
| 2 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?The top tier of desirables have all the sex Doesn't this only make sense? People having sex with who they desire? It's how freedom works. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 06:03 AM |
| 0 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?Communism can work and why would people want to destroy it? I think things would be better for everyone, even the betas. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 05:56 AM |
| 2 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?I understand that, but it sounds like the "betas" wouldn't be getting any share of these resources. Which is false. Everyone would have access to resources. Shouldn't the "beta" women also be resigned to sex toys and porn, since men don't necessarily want to have sex with someone they're not attracted to either? Sure if they want to. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 05:55 AM |
| 7 | Are there any women/men here who don't think looks matter at all or that they matter very little?Most people consider my partner quite ugly, but I personally like him. Same thing happened with my ex. It's not that I don't care about looks, it's just that I probably have an unconventional taste. For example, a lot of women find men who look like Christian Grey in the movie attractive, I personally think he looks like a homosexual. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 05:46 AM |
| 2 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?They won't work for "them". They will be working for everyone. The point of communism is that everyone can get a fair share of resources. So making men have sex with objects is better than making women have sex with people they're not attracted to? Women having sex with men they're not attracted to is similar to a rape-like experience and it's very ugly for the women. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 05:42 AM |
| 1 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?Is it a preconception that complete sexual freedom would lead to what I say? Women having sex with only certain men? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 05:33 AM |
| 1 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?Of course most men want a real woman. However, real women wouldn't necessarily want them. I think incels always existed, with what I propose, there would just be a few more incels. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 05:27 AM |
| 1 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?Communists care about the people, not about "society". | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 05:26 AM |
| 2 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?I'd rather have freedom than "productivity". | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 05:26 AM |
| 2 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?Well, if eugenics are the result of sexual freedom, then why is that a problem? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 05:24 AM |
| 2 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?It sounds like you're suggesting that everyone who is not part of some privileged group of people can go live in the woods (or in a cave) if they refuse to provide for the privileged group. Sounds a little like the movie "Elysium." The top of the gene pool went to go live in a lavish, utopia-like space station that hovered above the earth, while everyone else was left to die on earth working to support them. If they refuse to work, why should the commune be obligated to keep them around? Ah. So … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 05:23 AM |
| 1 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?Men and women being dependent on each other - people in general being dependent on each others - do create humans with more compassion, empathy, etc. Thank god that is the point of communism then. To make you see the commune as a family and take care of them while they take care of you. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 05:22 AM |
| 1 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?Human children require a primary bond to a single set of parents. Citation needed. Besides the parents can be involved as much as they like to the life of their kids. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 05:21 AM |
| 2 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?They don't have to associate with the commune if they don't want. The commune will not have to associate with people who don't contribute either. However, it sounds to me like the betas would have more options in the society I propose than now. In communism they will get easy access to sex bots, VR porn, artificial wombs as long as they help out to run the commune. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 12:50 AM |
| 2 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?The men will be freed from societal obligations and will be able to pursue their own interests. They can get sex bots, use artificial wombs to reproduce etc. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 12:48 AM |
| 1 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?I would recommend asking in socialist subs like /r/communism101 and /r/debatecommunism for details on how the system works. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 12:48 AM |
| 1 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?It's entirely against human nature. Why? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 12:42 AM |
| 2 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?The "commune"? Why would they when the same low value men to raise those children know they will never have any of their own? Because the commune will be their family. If they don't want to help out then the commune doesn't have to associate with them and they will be kicked out. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 12:42 AM |
| 2 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?Essentially yes, but why would that be a bad thing? I think a decrease in population will be positive. Besides the betas will be able to use artificial wombs to reproduce if they really want to. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 12:41 AM |
| 1 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?Plus, a classless society can never work without strong brainwashing. That's just your assumption. I think it can be preserved without brainwashing under certain circumstances. I mean, there exists communism that is not Marxist, so I disagree. Communism is a system that is stateless and classless, everyone agrees on that. Marxists and anarchists just disagree on how to get there. Marxist-Leninists believe that there should be a state first so that people can learn communism, while anarchists bel… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 12:11 AM |
| 1 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?Yes, that's why I posted the video for everyone interested. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/17 11:54 PM |
| 0 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?Didn't you just advocate for collectivization of the means of production in a post made literally 10 minutes before this? Yes, because I think private property itself is based on theft. I believe my system will make things better for the individual, it's not about achieving something for "society". Collectivism vs individualism is a false dichotomy. The purpose of communism is to improve the life for the people , not for "society". Only fascism cases about "society" and "nation" as if they're be… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/17 11:54 PM |
| 1 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?The capitalists are stealing from the workers and exploiting them because they don't pay them based on the value they produce. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-XED2nmCFNk This video explains it in a very simple way. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/17 11:50 PM |
| 1 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?I mean, communism doesn't appeal over individualism in terms of liberating the se Collectivism vs individualism is a false dichotomy. You can care about both individual rights and collective rights. You speak like there's one form of communism. There are no multiple forms of communism, however communists tend to disagree on how to get there. The definition of communism is still the same, the disagreement is on how to achieve it. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/17 11:41 PM |
| 3 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?You couldn't trust women to accurately choose the guys who would build a thriving society. And women dont know how to raise masculine boys. In the hypothetical that I describe, the women won't be raising the kids alone. Everyone in the commune will be helping to raise the kids. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/17 11:38 PM |
| 1 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?Why will it make people any more miserable than they are now in the hypothetical that I described? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/17 11:37 PM |
| 2 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?Maybe some communists want no families, but that doesn't seem like most. Communists realize that the family unit will radically change in communism as the family unit was created because of certain material conditions that won't exist in communism. You don't know much about communism if you think communists don't realize that the family unit will change and that marriage will be obsolete. In communism the children will be raised by the commune as a whole and everyone in the commune will be famil… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/17 11:36 PM |
| 1 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?I view individualism vs collectivism as a false dichotomy. However, I guarantee you that communists support sexual freedom and the destruction of the nuclear family, which is what I propose. So now the slaves must be made to consent of their own will. Yes and communists want to liberate them from that. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/17 11:23 PM |
| 2 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?You're making the case that caring about "society" whatever that means is more moral and than caring about individual rights and freedoms. You haven't proven so. I didn't make it personal, I meant that I don't see why it's less moral to protect the freedoms of the individual than the well-being of "society" whatever that means. According to this way of thinking, why free the slaves? They were useful to "society". | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/17 11:17 PM |
| 2 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?People's freedom < Society's Power and Progress Why? Why should I care more about "society" than individual freedom? Also, how are you so sure that there can't be an alternative? Society has progressed and changed a lot throughout the ages and we're still here. I think that under certain circumstances, what I propose could be sustained. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/17 11:10 PM |
| 2 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?I personally think women wouldn't pursue beta bux if there was a way to have a family without the beta. Women who do this are the ones who have no other option, as the monogamous nature of traditional marriage necessitates the need for a nuclear family. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/17 11:07 PM |
| 2 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?How is the traditional system not worse? It suppresses everyone's sexuality and it's based on mostly lies. There has been enormous amounts of lies, manipulation and societal control in order to enforce the traditionally monogamous system. The traditional system exploits the men in a worse way too. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/17 11:04 PM |
| 0 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?Forced redistribution of entire productivities of individuals If you're talking about taking the means of production away from the capitalists and collectivizing them, do you realize that the capitalists are the ones who steal from the working class in the first place? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/17 11:02 PM |
| 1 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?Why is communism immoral? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/17 10:59 PM |
| 1 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?Well, according to your own moral view, is that system "evil"? Would it be really worse than how things are now? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/17 10:57 PM |
| 1 | Is complete sexual freedom "evil"?I don't know, I'm asking for your opinions. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/17 10:55 PM |
| 3 | How many feminists here believe that polygyny and harems will result from sexual freedom?You talked to me and I am not a feminist, as I support equal rights for everyone not specifically female rights. This is a RP view, not a feminist one. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/17 10:42 PM |
| 2 | How many feminists here believe that polygyny and harems will result from sexual freedom?I am not a feminist. I am RP, I just hate TRP sub for various reasons. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/17 10:41 PM |
| 4 | Do women lie about what they are attracted to or do some people just not understand that women are individuals?I have often seen RPillers saying that society lies to them, telling them to just "be themselves" and that if they are nice guys a woman will drop from the sky and love them forever. That's obviously a gross exaggeration. Like you said, the media, female-oriented novels etc. are filled with attractive men. It's not some secret that a lot of women are attracted to men who are confident, fit and conventionally atttractive. Hell, there are even some women who openly admit that they go for assholes.… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/17 10:07 AM |
| 1 | The Collapse of DatingI believe that these legal protections will eventually be replaced by a different system though. I don't know if marriage will completely die out and I don't think it should be forcibly abolished, but I do think it will be a mostly dead institution in the future. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/17 09:14 AM |
| 1 | The Collapse of DatingSure, nobody said that monogamy will stop existing. I was talking about the notion of strict monogamy that comes from marriage which is a dying isntitution in my opinion. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/17 08:55 AM |
| 1 | Q4Women: I don't have a problem with men leaving men alone, just don't stacking men. So, if so many women hate men, why do women want to integrate with men?Why do you want harems to form in an ideal communist society? I don't. I just want sexual freedom. I just believe harems will be the natural result of sexual freedom. Wouldn't the ideal communist society involve some form of maintaining positive relations between the genders and reforming basic notions of masculinity and femininity, rather than restructuring and reinforcing them? How are you RP? Do you believe sexuality is a social contruct of something? I don't support gender roles by the way. … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/17 08:54 AM |
| 4 | [CMV] The world would be a better place...Having equal sex drive doesn't mean that hypergamy wouldn't exist. It would barely solve anything. The world would be a better place if men and women were infertile till 28 That's useless, why can't people just use birth control and be responsible? What would being infertile until 28 really solve? I just imagine there would be fewer single mothers, but that's nothing responsible birth control can't solve. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/17 08:52 AM |
| 1 | Q4Women: I don't have a problem with men leaving men alone, just don't stacking men. So, if so many women hate men, why do women want to integrate with men?I hope it will be achieved some day. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/17 08:44 AM |
| 1 | Q4Women: I don't have a problem with men leaving men alone, just don't stacking men. So, if so many women hate men, why do women want to integrate with men?Countries like the USSR were not communist anyway. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/17 08:41 AM |
| 1 | Q4Women: I don't have a problem with men leaving men alone, just don't stacking men. So, if so many women hate men, why do women want to integrate with men?Yes and if you say communists can't be libertarian socialists, you're basically embarassing yourself. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/17 08:36 AM |
| 1 | Q4Women: I don't have a problem with men leaving men alone, just don't stacking men. So, if so many women hate men, why do women want to integrate with men?I think you're the one who has no idea what he's talking about. Anarcho-communism is libertarian socialist. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/17 08:29 AM |
| 1 | Why do you think about people who act like women have identical views?Lauren Southern is kind of a racist though. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/17 08:29 AM |
| 1 | Q4Women: I don't have a problem with men leaving men alone, just don't stacking men. So, if so many women hate men, why do women want to integrate with men?https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarian_socialism Past and present political philosophies and movements commonly described as libertarian socialist include anarchism as well as autonomism, communalism, participism, guild socialism,[27] revolutionary syndicalism, and libertarian Marxist[28] philosophies such as council communism[29] and Luxemburgism;[30] as well as some versions of "utopian socialism"[31] and individualist anarchism You're really dense, aren't you? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/17 08:12 AM |
| 1 | Q4Women: I don't have a problem with men leaving men alone, just don't stacking men. So, if so many women hate men, why do women want to integrate with men?"Maybe the one thing that the white working man can hang onto is that he runs his home? Now that that’s being taken away and nothing is being offered, he’s not part of the program of advancing women’s rights. That’s fine for college professors, but it has a different effect in working-class areas. It doesn’t have to be that way. It depends on how it’s done, and it was done in a way that simply undermined natural solidarity. There are a lot of factors that play into it, but by this point it’s goi… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/17 08:11 AM |
| 1 | Q4Women: I don't have a problem with men leaving men alone, just don't stacking men. So, if so many women hate men, why do women want to integrate with men?Yes, an anarcho-communist, so basically a libertarian socialist. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/17 08:09 AM |
| 1 | Q4Women: I don't have a problem with men leaving men alone, just don't stacking men. So, if so many women hate men, why do women want to integrate with men?edit: didn't see the last part. you're right. it just means you're a non-genuine leftist. you're a leftist because it benefits you, not because it benefits others. Way to strawman me and accuse me of things I never said. By the way, everyone cares about their self-interest. I believe workers should care about their self-interest too, that's why they should seize the means of production. Your understanding of leftism is poor. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/17 07:41 AM |
| 1 | Q4Women: I don't have a problem with men leaving men alone, just don't stacking men. So, if so many women hate men, why do women want to integrate with men?I think that genetic differences are primarily caused by wealth and opportunity, not necessarily by genetic structure. So you basically believe that hypergamy exists only because of wealth inequality? I really doubt it. I don't know why you have a problem with sexual freedom though. If you are a true libertarian socialist, you should support it. I am a libertarian socialist too, I support sexual freedom but I doubt equality to access to resources will eliminate hypergamy. I just don't see hyperg… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/17 07:40 AM |
| 1 | Q4Women: I don't have a problem with men leaving men alone, just don't stacking men. So, if so many women hate men, why do women want to integrate with men?You called me a Nazi because I said I want sexual freedom for everyone. That's completely stupid. continue to call yourself a 'progressive leftist' despite being completely and totally selfish in your intent. Whatever my intentions may or may not be, that doesn't mean I can't be a progressive leftist. The left is very diverse. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/17 06:52 AM |
| 1 | Why do you think about people who act like women have identical views?I didn't call you a racist, I simply said that I don't think you and Lauren Southern care about male rights. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/17 06:37 AM |
| 0 | Why do you think about people who act like women have identical views?That's still not caring about male rights. I would imagine someone who cares about male rights would want to help the men who are fleeing from dangerous places, warzones and poor hellholes in general. That's caring only about white male rights. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/17 06:28 AM |
| 1 | People who have happy relationships or a satisfactory dating life in general, how is it?I hope so because intentionally leading people on is evil. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/17 06:24 AM |
| 1 | Q4Women: I don't have a problem with men leaving men alone, just don't stacking men. So, if so many women hate men, why do women want to integrate with men?which is national socialism and almost exactly what you describe in your posts. Sexual freedom is the same as Nazism? Omg, you're dense. You have told me that you're only communist because you believe it will free women's ability to hypergamize. That's not a systematic belief, that's a belief that's designed around your individual benefit. I'm a communist for many reasons and complete sexual freedom is definitely one of those reasons. You're essentially trying to argue that sexual freedom is som… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/17 06:09 AM |
| 2 | People who have happy relationships or a satisfactory dating life in general, how is it?I'm not in a "relationship" (although some chick seems to think so). You better make it clear to her then. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/17 06:06 AM |
| 1 | Q4Women: I don't have a problem with men leaving men alone, just don't stacking men. So, if so many women hate men, why do women want to integrate with men?I am not anarcho-capitalist. I am pro-communist, pro-sexual freedom. What you're saying makes no sense to me. The far-right is against sexual freedom and everything I stand for. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/17 12:11 AM |
| 1 | Q4Women: I don't have a problem with men leaving men alone, just don't stacking men. So, if so many women hate men, why do women want to integrate with men?Well alright. If I am not a progressive leftist then what am I? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/17 12:06 AM |
| 1 | Q4Women: I don't have a problem with men leaving men alone, just don't stacking men. So, if so many women hate men, why do women want to integrate with men?I am anti-marriage, anti-capitalist, pro-equal rights, pro-sexual freedom. I think those are progressive leftist views. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/17 12:01 AM |
| 8 | Misconceptions about hypergamyWomen are attracted to men they view as good genetic material, while men are much less picky and would generally have sex with almost every woman. That's the difference. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 11:22 PM |
| 1 | Q4Women: I don't have a problem with men leaving men alone, just don't stacking men. So, if so many women hate men, why do women want to integrate with men?What? Women don't hate men, "hate" is too strong of a word. I think most women ultimately do seek for men's approval. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 11:06 PM |
| 1 | People who have happy relationships or a satisfactory dating life in general, how is it?INTP. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 10:35 PM |
| 5 | People who have happy relationships or a satisfactory dating life in general, how is it?Can't relate, I guess we have very different personalities. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 10:05 PM |
| 7 | People who have happy relationships or a satisfactory dating life in general, how is it?Eh, I personally feel much better without being anxious. I guess it's because I have suffered from anxieties for a long time in my life. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 09:37 PM |
| 5 | The Collapse of DatingIt's not that bad. We just have to accept that marriage is a failure and try to replace it with other systems. Once we accept that marriage and strict monogamy are not necessities and stop bullshitting about stupid expectations of eternal love, I believe things will improve. We're just in the middle of the transition, that's why things are difficult. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 09:23 PM |
| 2 | Lets discuss female body hairWhat do you mean exactly? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 05:09 PM |
| 1 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnIt's not about eugenics. It's essentially about sexual freedom. If eugenics are caused by sexual freedom, then so be it. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 03:54 PM |
| 6 | Why doesn't society just tell boys/men what girls/women want?I am pretty sure society encourages everyone to exercize and stay fit and stuff like "dress well and be confident" is pretty common advice. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 03:29 PM |
| 1 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnWomen with their hyoergamy determine who has the superior genes. that's their job. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 03:28 PM |
| 1 | Lets discuss female body hairGreeks aren't particularly hairy though. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 03:27 PM |
| 3 | Lets discuss female body hairYouthfulness is not the same as being a child. Women over the age of 10 have body hair. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 06:10 AM |
| 3 | Lets discuss female body hairIf men want women who look like children, why are they often attracted to women with big breasts? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 05:45 AM |
| 15 | Lets discuss female body hairWhen my parents were young, almost nobody bothered to shave body hair and there was no problem. Yet nowadays it is viewed as disgusting. I am just interested because some RPillers act like almost everything we find attractive is completely based on evo psych and that social conditioning plays no role. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 05:30 AM |
| 1 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnDoesn't matter. It still shows that it can work under certain circumstances. I don't expect everything to be perfect. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 04:50 AM |
| 1 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnHuman beings are in the same state now as we were hundreds of thousands of years ago Exactly, and hunters-hgatherers societies were quite egalitarian both economically and on a gender basis. Therefore economic and gender egalitarianism are not against human nature under certain material conditions. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 04:49 AM |
| 1 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnCivilization may collapse anyway, but patriarchy will never go away. "Patriarchy" is feminists clumsily trying to explain away male and female psychology, with men taking risks and doing almost everything, and women playing it safe and being social. Patriarchy will never go away as long are men and women exist. I define the patriarchy as restricting female sexuality and lack of equal rights. I don't believe men and women are the same. Omega uprising. Betas, by definition, fuck the same girls alp… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 04:45 AM |
| 1 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnIf you think that a feminized society won't be overrun by a strong willed violent patriarchical one, then you really need to take a look at Europe and the spread of Islam. Fear-mongering nonsense. There is no evidence Islam will somehow prevail and conquer us. there's a good reason why men overwhelmingly reject immigration Inaccurate. A significant number of men votes left. Every single human civilization is built on heirarchy structures, that's part of the reason why communism always fails. Com… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 04:43 AM |
| 1 | I do not know about anyone else, but I am personally burnt out on feminism and mensrights and related topics. Does anyone else feel the same way? Seriously; we spend all day in this subreddit blasting away at each other.I think there can be quite interesting discussions around here. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 04:35 AM |
| 2 | I do not know about anyone else, but I am personally burnt out on feminism and mensrights and related topics. Does anyone else feel the same way? Seriously; we spend all day in this subreddit blasting away at each other.No, of course he didn't. He kept fighting Nazis until the war was over. Then after that he fought the dirty commies. Yes, like sending his troops to Athens to murder people. Such a great guy. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 04:32 AM |
| 1 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnI don't oppose prostitution, but I doubt it will exist in my ideal system as there would be no reason for it to exist. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 03:51 AM |
| 2 | The Red Pille Rage (x-post from RedPillWomen)That's nonsense seeing how hunters-gatherer communities are actually quite communist-like. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 03:44 AM |
| 2 | The Red Pille Rage (x-post from RedPillWomen)This wasn't communism, it was state socialism. Communism is a stateless system by definition. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 03:25 AM |
| 2 | The Red Pille Rage (x-post from RedPillWomen)It's the only system that can allow true sexual and reproductive freedom. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 03:09 AM |
| 1 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnIt would be nice if robots did all of the work and humans were free to do whatever they want. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 02:46 AM |
| 1 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnI think robots can help us with a lot of labor in the future. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 02:44 AM |
| 1 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnThis wasn't about you specifically. It's about the general idea that sexual freedom is evil. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 02:43 AM |
| 1 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnNo, hypergamy doesn't only have to do with going for men who are rich. It's about going for superior men in general. Hypergamy can't be eliminated even in communist societies. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 02:43 AM |
| 1 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnWhy can't I be a communist if I am RP? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 02:40 AM |
| 2 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no return"Communism is evil". "Except for sexual communism, because I can't get laid on my own." | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 02:36 AM |
| 1 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnEssentially yes, but I don't like the RPW sub because there are too many tradcons there. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 02:35 AM |
| 1 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnI am sure we will find a way around that. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 02:18 AM |
| 3 | The Red Pille Rage (x-post from RedPillWomen)When I say equal access to resources, I mean that the means of production will belong to everyone. This is nothing like what we have now. Women will have no need for male resources in that system as the resources will be shared according to need. This means women would have sex only with the men who are good genetic material. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 02:17 AM |
| 1 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnI am disagreeing with the tradcon RPs that want a return to traditional, patriarchal marriage. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 02:16 AM |
| 1 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnThe USSR was not a communist society, it was state socialist. Communism is a stateless system where people live in separate communes that cooperate with one another. Inside the commune the decisions are made by direct democracy and the resources are shared. I personally think that once we reach a society where the resources are shared, there would be no need for marriage and strict monogamy. The children will be raised by the commune as a whole and the whole of the commune will be your family. T… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 02:16 AM |
| 1 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returni really don't see what's the problem with eugenics as long as it's based on free choice. It's the natural order of the world. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 02:03 AM |
| 2 | The Red Pille Rage (x-post from RedPillWomen)Not necessarily, for example long term cohabitation without marriage is the majority in Holland. That's a step in the right direction at least. Marriage as an institution should be abandoned. Women don't have equal access to resources because nobody has equal access to resources in the system that we live in. using your example they are getting more than equal resources, they get what they bring and what their SO brings. You're missing the point that this system exists for a reason. The reason m… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 02:02 AM |
| 1 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnThey can do that if they like. As long as they don't cause problems to women and their partners, they can create their own commune as much as they want. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 01:59 AM |
| 2 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnI support equal rights, not equal outcomes. Whether men end up holding social power in the society I propose is irrelevant as there would still be equal rights and equal opportunities. And no I don't care about eugenics, I care about freedom. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 01:58 AM |
| 1 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnyes because sexual freedom is basically Nazism. /s | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 01:56 AM |
| 1 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnI only support sexual freedom. If freedom leads to positive eugenics then why is that a problem? I think it would be good for the improvement of our species. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 01:54 AM |
| 2 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnBecause communists want people to have sexual freedom. Communists wouldn't support a patriarchal system. We believe everyone should have equal rights. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 01:53 AM |
| 1 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnI agree. That's why I advocate for a society where everyone contributes for the greater good or gets kicked out of the commune and can go live on their own. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 01:52 AM |
| 2 | The Red Pille Rage (x-post from RedPillWomen)Yes, that's the point. The man provides, the woman spends. It's called marriage. I don't know what you don't understand here. The point is that women only get equal access to resources through marriage. What they spend is irrelevant. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 01:51 AM |
| 2 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnI didn't say life was "peaceful" in hunters-gatherers societies. However, it was gender egalitarian , mostly. That's well-documented. You're equating patriarchy with forced monogamy, which is a false equivalency. Patriarchy is the dominance of males in social structure, which occurs primarily because women value and mate with the alpha male and those at the top of the social structure. Monogamy (which is not as forced as you rhetorically announce) was created to even the game out. No, patriarchy… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 01:50 AM |
| 1 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnI believe in equal opportunity, not equal outcomes. They will have their chance, but they're not entitled to procreation. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 01:38 AM |
| 2 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnNo, you should study the historical context in which patriarchy was created. Societies weren't always patriarchal, hunters-gatherers societies were quite egalitarian and hypergamy existed back then. The patriarchy (forced monogamy) was created with the invention of agriculture later. It has nothing to do with hypergamy, it's just forced monogamy, which is the opposite of hypergamy. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 01:38 AM |
| 1 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnI believe that everyone should be free and I believe that sexual freedom is important. Sure it sucks for certain guys, but I'm sure they will find something else to keep themselves occupied. It's the reason why I support sex bots. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 01:36 AM |
| 1 | The Red Pille Rage (x-post from RedPillWomen)In the west women do, in fact they control the majority of spending. They only do through marriage. That's the point. Marriage only exists for the economic protection of women. Without the economic incentive, there would be 0 reason to get married. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 01:35 AM |
| 1 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnThe patriarchy is not needed for sexual freedom to exist. Hunters-gatherers societies were not patriarchal for example and I'm sure hypergamy existed then. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 01:33 AM |
| 2 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnI don't propose a matriarchal world. I simply believe that people should have equal rights and sexual freedom. You're right that the world is built on war and conquest but I don't believe it should continue to be so. My hope is that we will eventually manage to bring the world together and I think with modern technology and ethics, we will be able to achieve that. peace can be achieved simply by subordinating men and their desires to control things. I don't think most men are war-mongers and wan… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 01:32 AM |
| 3 | The Red Pille Rage (x-post from RedPillWomen)We don't have equal access to resources at all. Also, I never said that what i propose would eliminate hypergamy. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 01:12 AM |
| 1 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnLets not discuss communism now, however communism was never really tried, those were state socialist states. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 12:31 AM |
| 1 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnNo, it's not the same thing at all, | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 12:30 AM |
| 1 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnGood for you. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 12:23 AM |
| 1 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnPerhaps, but there is hope for the future. "Something worked therefore it should be preserved at all costs" is a silly argument and doesn't prove that a return to the patriarchy can actually be achieved or that it is even desirable. I can imagine a king back in feudalism going like "how can you want to destroy feudalism? Feudalism has a better track record of survival than capitalism and liberalism. Feudalism and monarchy are human nature." | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 12:18 AM |
| 1 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnYes, but in Japan there is more sexual freedom than in the Middle East. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 12:06 AM |
| 1 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnNo, I am against welfare. I want outright communism. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 12:05 AM |
| 2 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnThat's like saying "feudalism worked, so we should have never abandoned feudalism". Civilizations are not static, they evolve all the time. I don't see how a return to the patriarchy can be achieved and I don't see why it would be desirable. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 12:03 AM |
| 1 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnAh, I misunderstood. Alright, why do you think maintaining the family is more important than individual freedoms? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/17 10:24 PM |
| 1 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnWhat does "total freedom for family" mean? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/17 10:20 PM |
| 1 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnEmphasizing family is not caring about men's rights. Men's rights is way broader than "wanting to maintain family at all costs". | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/17 10:13 PM |
| 0 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnPatriarchy means many things. For example a family where the man is the leader can be described as "patriarchal". I don't personally agree with a lot of the points of feminist analysis though. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/17 10:02 PM |
| 2 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnNo, wtf. Let them breed. In Africa many of them are dying from starvation. It would be beneficial for them if they didn't have so many kids. I could write a couple of pages on my moral values but let's keep it short and say I believe the man must hold the dominant position because he is superior in every regard while women are inferior and mustn't be allowed to the same rights. I wish you could ellaborate and describe your ideal society and what rights women and men would have, how socialife wou… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/17 09:56 PM |
| 0 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnI don't advocate for feminism though. I fully support men's rights personally. I said "hopefully" because I wanted to be realistic. However, do you think traditionalism cares about men's rights? Of course it doesn't. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/17 09:51 PM |
| 2 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnWell, then maybe we should find a way encourage them to have fewer kids in Africa instead of just starting a competition on who will breed more, don't you think? What are your moral values and what do you support exactly. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/17 09:43 PM |
| 1 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnIt's not only the "economically illiterate". Multiple researchers believe that economic change will be needed in the future because of automation and technology. I personally don't support the welfare state anyway, I think there should be way more radical change. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/17 09:41 PM |
| 2 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnHopefully it will happen, I definitely think men should be freed from gender roles too. In my country there's even mandatory military service for men and it's mainly the nationalists and the consevratives that want to preserve it. I view it as horrible for the guys. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/17 09:27 PM |
| 1 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnThere's no reason to keep the population numbers at replacement rates. The economic system will have to change either way because of automation. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/17 09:22 PM |
| 2 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnI think true freedom will benefit men too as they will be liberated from traditional gender roles like having to provide for the family. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/17 09:21 PM |
| 1 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnI didn't say there will ever be a matriarchy. I meant that we should preserve equal rights and sexual freedom, there's no going back now. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/17 09:14 PM |
| 2 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnSexual freedom. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/17 08:20 PM |
| 3 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnIf you don't want to call it "patriarchy", you can call it traditionalism or strict monogamy. The point remains. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/17 08:19 PM |
| 3 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnThe Middle East is patriarchal, therefore it's not the fault of sexual liberation if these men are sexually frustrated, that's my point. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/17 08:18 PM |
| 1 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnEllaborate. Do you think a return to the patriarchy can actually happen? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/17 08:16 PM |
| 3 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnWhatever. if you don't want to call it patriarchy, you can call it traditionalism or however you like. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/17 08:14 PM |
| 6 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnThe patriarchy only truly benefits a few men. Men in patriarchal societies get fucked over all the time. One more reason to empower everyone instead of advocating for the return to a more patriarchal system. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/17 08:13 PM |
| 2 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnNobody said anything about communism here. Although, yea, it's inevitable. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/17 08:10 PM |
| 1 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnWhat do you mean? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/17 08:10 PM |
| 5 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnBecause the patriarchy is basically the elite men creating the rules that fuck over both men and women. The patriarchy doesn't benefit all men. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/17 08:09 PM |
| 3 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnWhat? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/17 06:50 PM |
| 6 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnSexual frustration is not the only reason these things in the Middle East are happening, that's ridiculous. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/17 06:50 PM |
| 3 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnThe Middle East is mostly patriarchal though. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/17 06:44 PM |
| 2 | The Red Pille Rage (x-post from RedPillWomen)SMP is not the same as market capitalism. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/17 06:39 PM |
| 2 | The Red Pille Rage (x-post from RedPillWomen)I am pro-communism. I believe if women have equal access to resources, marriage won't be needed and therefore the sexual marketplace will be a lot freer for everyone. I don't care about preserving current western culture, I want to improve it. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/17 05:55 PM |
| 2 | The Red Pille Rage (x-post from RedPillWomen)I am a woman and RP and I used to be sad, for a while, about female nature and everything. I got over it once I started getting over my depression in general. One of the ways TRP affected me at first, was making me pro-patriarchy. I thought that was the only way. After listening to some people from the opposite side of politics, I changed my mind and now I think it would be for the best to abolish the patriarchy and marriage all together. TRPillers are right that marriage is a fraud and in my op… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/17 05:41 PM |
| 16 | The Red Pille Rage (x-post from RedPillWomen)You cannot love your mother and your sisters because of their personal sex lives? I don't understand you dude. Why do you care? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/17 05:16 PM |
| 0 | Why do you think about people who act like women have identical views?Lawren Southern doesn't care about male rights. if she did care about male rights, she wouldn't be anti-refugee. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/17 05:13 PM |
| 1 | Why don't men want to protect women in public anymore?This hasn't been my experience tbh. But I don't think men are obligated to help anyone. It would be nice if they did though (it would be great if everyone was willing to help one another more). | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/17 03:29 AM |
| 3 | CMV: Post Wall Women Have It Pretty GoodWell, I wasn't speaking about you. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/07/17 04:52 PM |
| 5 | CMV: Post Wall Women Have It Pretty GoodI don't get how someone can be so sadistic and hateful. Misandrists disgust me just as much. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/07/17 04:40 PM |
| 6 | CMV: Post Wall Women Have It Pretty GoodI just hate how some RPillers and MGTOW seem to get sadistic pleasure over how "lonely these post-wall women are". Seriously what's wrong with you? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/07/17 04:33 PM |
| 1 | Why do you think about people who act like women have identical views?A lot of RPillers and MGTOW seem to hate both frigid and promiscuous women tbh. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/07/17 12:51 PM |
| 1 | Why do you think about people who act like women have identical views?Nobody said a communist world would be pure good. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/07/17 12:42 AM |
| 1 | Why do you think about people who act like women have identical views?It might be easy for you since you don't live in a country as economically fucked up as Greece. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/07/17 12:30 AM |
| 1 | Why do you think about people who act like women have identical views?We need communism or we're all screwed. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/07/17 12:20 AM |
| 1 | Why do you think about people who act like women have identical views?Communism didn't exist because real communism never existed. These were socialist states trying to achieve communism. In my opinion, socialism and communism are far from dead and will make a return eventually. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/07/17 12:16 AM |
| 1 | Why do you think about people who act like women have identical views?Marx believed that socialism and communism are inevitable. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/07/17 12:11 AM |
| 1 | Why do you think about people who act like women have identical views?You missed my point which was that some people look forward, are progressive thinking. And without this, we would have never reached the stage where we are now. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/07/17 11:41 PM |
| 1 | Why do you think about people who act like women have identical views?Dostoevky is my favorite author actually. However, that is irrelevant. If people never thought in a revolutionary way, we would be still living under feudalism. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/07/17 11:18 PM |
| 1 | Why do you think about people who act like women have identical views?So I suppose you're satisfied with the state passing tyrannical laws all the time? With how representative democracy is an obvious fraud? With how workers are not paid based on the value they actually produce yet the capitalist who does nothing most of the time controls the means of production? Sounds like the ultimate cuckoldry to me. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/07/17 11:01 PM |
| 1 | Why do you think about people who act like women have identical views?By the state. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/07/17 10:32 PM |
| 1 | Why do you think about people who act like women have identical views?K. Keep getting cucked, never revolt. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/07/17 09:24 PM |
| 1 | Why do you think about people who act like women have identical views?I advocate for communism, which is ultimately meant to be a stateless system. So no it wouldn't benefit men more than women, it would benefit everyone. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/07/17 03:53 PM |
| 1 | Why do you think about people who act like women have identical views?That's why there should be no state. Only small communes that operate on direct democracy. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/07/17 03:44 PM |
| 1 | Why do you think about people who act like women have identical views?Men are not entitled to sex. In a free society, they would have the freedom to pursue women, but wouldn't be entitled to get sex from them. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/07/17 03:27 PM |
| 1 | Why do you think about people who act like women have identical views?Hillary is not a communist, lol. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/07/17 03:10 PM |
| 1 | Why do you think about people who act like women have identical views?Do you believe in actual freedom or not? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/07/17 03:10 PM |
| 1 | Why do you think about people who act like women have identical views?I didn't say that individual women shouldn't be criticized for their actions. However, painting women as inherently the enemy of men is divisive and it's an oversimplification of a complex issue in my opinion. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/07/17 01:21 PM |
| 1 | Why do you think about people who act like women have identical views?Lauren Southern Lol. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/07/17 01:20 PM |
| 1 | Why do you think about people who act like women have identical views?Yes, yes, an inherently revolutionary ideology is just feminine now.... | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/07/17 01:11 PM |
| 2 | Why do you think about people who act like women have identical views?Yes, but that's not the point of the thread. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/07/17 01:10 PM |
| 3 | Why do you think about people who act like women have identical views?perhaps you're right, but this is not the point of the thread. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/07/17 03:58 AM |
| 1 | Why do you think about people who act like women have identical views?I believe everyone should have equal access to resources. Besides it's known that men are more likely to own capital, while women are more likely to get access to capital through marriage. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/07/17 03:57 AM |
| 1 | Why do you think about people who act like women have identical views?That might be true in some cases, but not for the reasons they think. They act like men always influence women's opinions and that's the only reason women vote conservative , while in some cases, married women just vote conservative because they protect their own interests TRPillers basically often act that if you hate Trump and Theresa May you're some feminine man or a woman, which is ridiculous. They just use femininity to shame leftists because they hate leftists. Their cheering for Trump bac… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/07/17 02:24 AM |
| 1 | Why do you think about people who act like women have identical views?What does AWALT have to do with anything? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/07/17 02:18 AM |
| 1 | Why do you think about people who act like women have identical views?Doesn't matter. Still worth it to thrive for real sexual freedom. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/07/17 02:14 AM |
| 2 | Why do you think about people who act like women have identical views?By whom? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/07/17 02:09 AM |
| 1 | Why do you think about people who act like women have identical views?In this case, we're not talking about outliers, we're talking about significant amounts of women. For example they say women are all leftists, well then how come half of them don't vote leftist in a lot of cases? Half of women are "outliers"? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/07/17 02:09 AM |
| 2 | Why do you think about people who act like women have identical views?Citation needed. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/07/17 02:04 AM |
| 3 | What is the most abusive thing someone has ever done to you?Sexual assault, bullying, physical violence. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/07/17 01:59 AM |
| 4 | Why do you think about people who act like women have identical views?You're the one who didn't prove anything here. My counter-example obviously proves that it's not necessary for your personality to correlate with certain opinions. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/07/17 01:57 AM |
| 3 | Why do you think about people who act like women have identical views?I have changed my opinions a lot during the last few years, yet my personality hasn't changed. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/07/17 01:54 AM |
| 1 | Why do you think about people who act like women have identical views?Their argument is that men they can sympathize with are the majority, as are women they can't. What? I don't quite get it. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/07/17 01:52 AM |
| 3 | Why do you think about people who act like women have identical views?Personal opinions don't necessarily have something to do with your overall personality. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/07/17 01:51 AM |
| 3 | Why do you think about people who act like women have identical views?Varied personalities=/= varied opinions. What are you even talking about? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/07/17 01:47 AM |
| 3 | Why do you think about people who act like women have identical views?You lumping all leftists together like they have identical views is ridiculous. Also, so what if they're feminist allies? Being a feminist doesn't necessarily mean you're non-masculine. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/07/17 01:42 AM |
| 2 | Why do you think about people who act like women have identical views?I won't comment on your silly understanding of communism, but it's quite obvious that not all women are leftists anyway, so I don't know what your point is exactly. Communism is not unmasculine, neither it is non-feminine. That's nonsense. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/07/17 01:41 AM |
| 5 | Why do you think about people who act like women have identical views?Yea... Citation needed. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/07/17 01:36 AM |
| 1 | Why do you think about people who act like women have identical views?Only though marriage, that's not what I mean. The whole point of marriage is for women to have access to resources. If they had it either way, marriage and monogamy wouldn't be needed. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/07/17 01:35 AM |
| 6 | Why do you think about people who act like women have identical views?You can't just define masculinity based on how you personally perceive that and claim that every ideology except right-libertarianism is "unmasculine". | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/07/17 01:30 AM |
| 6 | Why do you think about people who act like women have identical views?Sounds like an excuse to shame left-wing views by associating them with femininity and shame leftist and liberal men as unmasculine. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/07/17 01:16 AM |
| 2 | Why do you think about people who act like women have identical views?Who generalized men again? I said it's about a specific kind of people. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/07/17 12:38 AM |
| 9 | Should men protect themselves from false accusations the way women protect themselves from being assaulted?I don't know. I personally know one person who falsely accused someone of rape, but she didn't go to the police, she just started spreading rumors about the guy. His life wasn't ruined fortunately, they actually got together again later. (lol) That being said, I imagine it's horrible to get falsely accused of rape but I think sexual assaults happen on a more regular basis that false sexual assault accusations do. Perhaps there needs to be some awareness to discourage people from making up such l… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/07/17 12:08 AM |
| 1 | "Misogyny" is just hatred of female sexualityI am very against misandry and I oppose the current system all together. So no I don't support misandry and anti-male laws but this thread was to focus on misogyny and blaming women for all of the problems in the world, which is a divisive view that doesn't accomplish anything good in my opinion. That being said you missed the point of the thread which was about a theory about why misogyny exists and has always existed. I see no need to make it about politics when misogyny existed in patriarchal… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/07/17 12:04 AM |
| 2 | Why do you think about people who act like women have identical views?Well, yes but one would expect better from the manosphere considering how often they complain about certain feminists generalizing them. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/07/17 11:11 PM |
| 5 | Why do you think about people who act like women have identical views?Then why do these people often oppose anti-male narrative like "teach men not to rape" or "all men are rapists". It seems very unnecessarily propagandist and anti-female in my opinion. not to mention it's often used as an excuse to say that "women shouldn't vote" for example. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/07/17 11:10 PM |
| 6 | Why do you think about people who act like women have identical views?Yea, I don't know if it's because of toxic masculinity, but I do think that some people antagonize women no matter what women do. For example women vote for leftist candidate "oh, it's because women are filthy commies". Women vote for Trump "oh, it's just because Trump get these whores hot with how much of an alpha male he is" (believe it or not there was a RP thread that argued exactly that) | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/07/17 11:05 PM |
| 2 | Why do you think about people who act like women have identical views?Well, yes that would happen. But it wouldn't be against the male strategy, it would be against those who can't compete. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/07/17 11:02 PM |
| 2 | Why do you think about people who act like women have identical views?I don't get why you think it's snarky. I worded it that way because I didn't want to portray all RPillers as doing this, because otherwise we would get replies like "Not all RP". | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/07/17 11:01 PM |
| 4 | Why do you think about people who act like women have identical views?No they aren't. They are antithetical only because the current system values monogamy. If women had equal access to resources, I don't think strict monogamy would be important to them. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/07/17 10:59 PM |
| 1 | Q4ALL: Do women have more fun in life than men? Does it depend on SMV? Does it depend on age?Nah, I doubt it. Men seem to have more fun interests usually. I think it's not about genders. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/07/17 10:27 PM |
| 3 | Q4ALL: "Women are like children, taking them seriously is often a mistake." Is this a misogynistic statement? Is this a sexist statement?No, that article suggests that women are mentally inferior. It has nothing to do with flirting. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/07/17 06:20 PM |
| 1 | Do TRPillers tend to underestimate how social programming can affect what people are attracted to?I didn't say they were. Do we have many ethnic minorities in western countries that have no body hair? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/07/17 05:43 PM |
| 1 | Q4ALL: "Women are like children, taking them seriously is often a mistake." Is this a misogynistic statement? Is this a sexist statement?What RP theory am I against? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/07/17 05:27 PM |
| 1 | Do TRPillers tend to underestimate how social programming can affect what people are attracted to?No, but here we're talking about people's dating preferences. And since most of us around here are either white or western, it makes sense to focus on westerners. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/07/17 05:24 PM |
| 1 | Do TRPillers tend to underestimate how social programming can affect what people are attracted to?Ok? Maybe. I am telling you about white people. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/07/17 05:18 PM |
| 1 | Do TRPillers tend to underestimate how social programming can affect what people are attracted to?Are you kidding me? I am a woman and I can tell you only children are hairless. Women have body hair once they reach puberty. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/07/17 05:16 PM |
| 1 | Do TRPillers tend to underestimate how social programming can affect what people are attracted to?And What is your point? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/07/17 04:51 PM |
| 1 | "Misogyny" is just hatred of female sexualityI am obviously not talking about that, I am talking about actual misogyny. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/07/17 04:49 PM |
| 1 | Q4ALL: "Women are like children, taking them seriously is often a mistake." Is this a misogynistic statement? Is this a sexist statement?Yea, more nonsense. I believe in RP theory and I don't like their vulgar ways. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/07/17 04:47 PM |
| 1 | "Misogyny" is just hatred of female sexualityBecause it saddens me that there are people who are so hateful and I'm interested in what causes such intense hatred. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/07/17 10:51 AM |
| 2 | "Misogyny" is just hatred of female sexualityI just thought it sounded like an appropriate term. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/07/17 10:50 AM |
| 3 | "Misogyny" is just hatred of female sexualityGoogle hive mind. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/07/17 10:45 AM |
| 1 | "Misogyny" is just hatred of female sexualityNobody said that it's mainstream. This is about discussing misogyny, not saying it's mainstream. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/07/17 10:44 AM |
| 3 | "Misogyny" is just hatred of female sexualityYes, I have think way more absurd things. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/07/17 10:43 AM |
| 2 | "Misogyny" is just hatred of female sexualityI am not sure about literal misogynists but lots of women are very critical of other women. Personal anecdote: One of my grandmothers is kind of a misogynist. She often says that women are more cunning and "evil" than men and she shames other women a lot, while acting like men are the best thing ever. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/07/17 10:43 AM |
| 1 | "Misogyny" is just hatred of female sexualityHow many compared to suffragettes? It depends on the country and the time period? Seriously, my point was that women are not a hive mind in any way. I really don't understand what is so difficult about the idea that if majority of a certain group exhibits a particular behaviour, What general behavior of women bothers you? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/07/17 10:40 AM |
| 2 | "Misogyny" is just hatred of female sexualityJust go to /r/TheRedPill? Lol. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/07/17 10:38 AM |
| 7 | "Misogyny" is just hatred of female sexualityNah, it's not that far fetched that someone would think that. I have seen incels and MGTOW say way more ridiculous things. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/07/17 10:17 AM |
| 2 | "Misogyny" is just hatred of female sexualityHypergamy can be viewed as ruthless, that's what I meant. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/07/17 10:14 AM |
| 3 | "Misogyny" is just hatred of female sexualityDo you know that back in the day there were anti-suffragettes who were women? Women are not a hive mind. They vote for all sort of policies and are definitely not exclusively left-wing. Generalizing women that way is stupid. There are men who openly discriminate against women in the workplace and there are men who rape and sexually abuse women and children. Men are more likely to be murderers too according to statistics and it's more likely for a man to murder his wife than the other way around.… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/07/17 10:13 AM |
| 1 | Why is " Locker Room Talk" Demonized?Meh, I sometimes wonder if there will be actual civil wars in many European countries in the future. There is increased instability almost everywhere as I see it and of course Islam also plays a role in that. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/07/17 09:45 AM |
| 2 | Do TRPillers tend to underestimate how social programming can affect what people are attracted to?Also, shaved vaginas are more neotenous, (traits that mimic youth) so it's not unrealistic that men who are exposed to them often like them. That makes no sense. Women over the age of ten have body hair. Are you saying men are programmed to be attracted to children? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/07/17 09:41 AM |
| 2 | Do TRPillers tend to underestimate how social programming can affect what people are attracted to?I didn't say it's completely unrelated to genes. I said that societies are created by material conditions, which is true. If you think social programming doesn't play a role, then how come men would have no problem with an unshaved vagina 30 years ago? How come the standards of beauty are not exactly the same throughout the world? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/07/17 08:42 AM |
| 1 | What would happen to sexual and dating dynamics if the welfare state was completely eliminated?I imagine the "patriarchy" would return in some way, not completely, but there would definitely be a stronger "patriarchy". The patriarchy was created specifically because of economic inequality. If there is equality to access to resources, then the genders are also more equal. This is why hunters-gatherers societies were a lot more gender egalitarian. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/07/17 08:40 AM |
| 2 | Do TRPillers tend to underestimate how social programming can affect what people are attracted to?Yea....no. Our genes haven't changed much. We are the same people as we were when we were hunters-gatherers. It's the material conditions that have changed. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/07/17 08:33 AM |
| 2 | Do TRPillers tend to underestimate how social programming can affect what people are attracted to?Societies are created by material conditions, that's why they have changed a lot throughout history. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/07/17 08:29 AM |
| 2 | "Misogyny" is just hatred of female sexualityNo, I simply said that most of the time, misogyny comes from hatred of female sexuality. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/07/17 08:28 AM |
| 1 | "Misogyny" is just hatred of female sexualityMGTOW hate traditionalist women too. If you lurk enough in their subreddit, you will see that. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/07/17 07:17 AM |
| 4 | "Misogyny" is just hatred of female sexualityIt also does not address legal issues a man faces because of women, such as discrimination and false accusations. Women face discrimination in the workplace. Just the other day someone here said that he would not hire women based on gender. Women get raped and abused by men. Why should all men be blamed for that? They shouldn't and I don't agree with that mindset. Yet you seem to tolerate the opposite, like blaming all women for men's problems. You are also inadvertently excusing women's poor be… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/07/17 07:14 AM |
| 1 | "Misogyny" is just hatred of female sexualitySomeone posted it here actually advocating for killing women himself just the other day. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/07/17 07:11 AM |
| 5 | "Misogyny" is just hatred of female sexualityWhy is it that every time someone talks about misogyny, someone else has to jump in and make it all about misandry? I am against misandry too. It's not the subject of the discussion though. I think you missed a step between all this. When women called for equality, they were asking for something that they didn't have. "Women" didn't call for anything. Feminists did. Women are not a hive mind. They have very diverse opinions. A man wants to be a stay at home dad, be a home maker and be more passi… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/07/17 07:07 AM |
| 2 | "Misogyny" is just hatred of female sexualityNobody is forcing you to associate with women if you don't like them. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/07/17 01:45 AM |
| 1 | Why is " Locker Room Talk" Demonized?Not even hardcore tankies are defending Pol Pot. He also basically started calling himself a Maoist after Mao's death to earn the support of the Maoist party. Pol Pot called himself many things, he was an opportunist. Also, it was literally the Vietnamese communists who stopped Pol Pot. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/07/17 01:41 AM |
| 6 | "Misogyny" is just hatred of female sexualityAnd women only have power over men because of their sexuality. Therefore what I'm saying is true. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/07/17 01:33 AM |
| 5 | Q4ALL: "Women are like children, taking them seriously is often a mistake." Is this a misogynistic statement? Is this a sexist statement?It's maybe meant to be shocking in typical TRP ways. It filters the sensitive out. Sounds like an excuse. Also, are you basically saying TRPillers are trolls who should not be taken seriously? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/07/17 01:32 AM |
| 1 | Why is " Locker Room Talk" Demonized?I have never met a communist who defends Plot Pot thought. He seemed more of an opportunists, than a communist. It was also the Vietnamese communists who actually stopped Pol Pot. Also, Nazism is just a branch of fascism really. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/07/17 01:31 AM |
| 8 | Q4ALL: "Women are like children, taking them seriously is often a mistake." Is this a misogynistic statement? Is this a sexist statement?Okay, perhaps you are right. Are you going to deny that article is meant to be mean-spirited? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/07/17 01:07 AM |
| 1 | Why is " Locker Room Talk" Demonized?You'e not studying the context at all if you think communism is as bad as fascism. Yes, communists have directly or indirectly caused many deaths. But it wasn't for the same reasons or under the same circumstances. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/07/17 01:05 AM |
| 6 | Q4ALL: "Women are like children, taking them seriously is often a mistake." Is this a misogynistic statement? Is this a sexist statement?The article obviously suggests that women are mentally inferior under any circumstance. It's not about "women not meant to being taken seriously under certain circumstances", it's way more broad than that, it suggests that women are just mentally inferior in general. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/07/17 12:34 AM |
| 4 | Q4ALL: "Women are like children, taking them seriously is often a mistake." Is this a misogynistic statement? Is this a sexist statement?The "article" is obviously meant to be mean-spirited and undermining towards women. I don't know how you can deny it. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/07/17 12:15 AM |
| 1 | Why is " Locker Room Talk" Demonized?My family members don't want to move because they want to fight here. If things get too serious and threatening, I might leave, but I would prefer to fight for my country honestly. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/07/17 11:43 PM |
| 2 | Why is " Locker Room Talk" Demonized?Believe me nobody expected an actual fascist movement to rise in Greece and nobody saw it coming back in the day. It all happened before people could realize it, yet many people lost their lives over the last few years and apparently there was the threat of an actual coup in 2015 if we are to believe the book by out ex-finance minister. These things can happen before you realize it. As much as you hate mass immigration and leftism , you must always keep the threat of fascism in mind, as it can c… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/07/17 11:41 PM |
| 1 | Why is " Locker Room Talk" Demonized?Not in Greece. Here, people have been murdered and the government apparently had to take a step back over fears of a fascist coup. I don't think you wan to get to that point. Yes, I don't like the SJWs, yes I don't think heterogeneity and Islam are the best. However, if you are close to any communist/leftist or any non-German/non-Aryan and you don't want something bad to happen to them, you should probably be concerned about the rise of fascism. These people can gain a lot of power before you ev… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/07/17 11:19 PM |
| 1 | Why is " Locker Room Talk" Demonized?Between you and me I used to be anti-communist too and I didn't get on well with most people in my family. I even used to be on quite close terms with Golden Dawn members for a while until I found out that they literally have written down members of my family as enemies. These people are ruthless and if you value freedom even a little bit, you should want nothing to do with them. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/07/17 11:03 PM |
| 1 | Why is " Locker Room Talk" Demonized?So I suppose you understand why I think it's concerning that fascism is on the rise? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/07/17 10:55 PM |
| 1 | Why is " Locker Room Talk" Demonized?Most people in my family are known communists are have been known communists for decades. My great-grandfather was a communist guerrilla during WW2 and the civil war. My uncle is a well-known member of the communist party. My cousin is a known ANTIFA. If fascism gets to power, we'll likely all be targeted. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/07/17 10:50 PM |
| 1 | Why is " Locker Room Talk" Demonized?Indeed, I think that is definitely happening. The far-right and the far-left are growing stronger , while the support for the "centrists" is weakening. In my country several people have been murdered over the far-right vs far-left conflict during the last few years, just hope the same thing won't happen to your country. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/07/17 10:30 PM |
| 1 | Why is " Locker Room Talk" Demonized?By the way it's the leftists that want to leave the EU in my country. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/07/17 10:24 PM |
| 2 | Q4ALL: "Women are like children, taking them seriously is often a mistake." Is this a misogynistic statement? Is this a sexist statement?? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/07/17 10:24 PM |
| 5 | Q4ALL: "Women are like children, taking them seriously is often a mistake." Is this a misogynistic statement? Is this a sexist statement?Something said by Shopenhauer is somehow "evidence"? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/07/17 10:22 PM |
| 2 | Why is " Locker Room Talk" Demonized?It's still quite concerning that a far-right party got so far. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/07/17 10:20 PM |
| 2 | Q4ALL: "Women are like children, taking them seriously is often a mistake." Is this a misogynistic statement? Is this a sexist statement?That article is based on 0 actual evidence lol. Should men take women seriously when women do absurd things? No. Is that "article" misogynist? Yes. I definitely think that "article" was meant to be mean-spirited in nature. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/07/17 10:19 PM |
| 1 | Why is " Locker Room Talk" Demonized?Yes, it's not like they almost had a far-right government. Definitely no... | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/07/17 10:17 PM |
| 3 | Why is " Locker Room Talk" Demonized?You probably know enough women to understand that most don't even care about feminist activism, let alone video games. Who cares what the media say, it's obvious that these people are not representative of most women. If they were then something like the new Ghostbusters would be a huge hit and something like 50 shades of Grey wouldn't be. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/07/17 10:16 PM |
| 1 | Why is " Locker Room Talk" Demonized?Fascism is on the rise everywhere in western countries, there's definitely something to worry about. If something happens and there's serious instability in your country there's always the threat of a fascist coup. One of the reasons why my prime minister stopped the negotiations with the EU in 2015 was because there was a threat of a coup, the book by out ex-finance minister suggests so. The same thing can happen to your country if something causes general instability and maybe you have no reas… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/07/17 10:12 PM |
| 2 | Why is " Locker Room Talk" Demonized?Do you want us to switch positions? You will come to live in Greece where an openly fascist party is a legitimate threat and I will take over your position in Germany where you barely have to worry about these issues. I am not a fan of SJWs and unchecked immigration but if you think the rise of fascism is not worrisome, you're wrong. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/07/17 09:58 PM |
| 1 | Why is " Locker Room Talk" Demonized?I don't disagree with you, but I think some people around here act like certain feminists are representative of all women somehow, which is obviously not true. Do these feminists even ask women about their opinions? No, they don't. Look at the new Ghostbusters for example, some feminists acted like it was going to be pro-women etc. We both know that most women are not even interested in these kind of movies, and this was shown with how the movie flopped too, nobody went to see it. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/07/17 09:54 PM |
| 1 | Why is " Locker Room Talk" Demonized?It's not about being offended. I am just concerned about the actual fascism growing. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/07/17 09:41 PM |
| 2 | Why is " Locker Room Talk" Demonized?Do you believe everything you see on the internet without studying the context at all? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/07/17 09:25 PM |
| 2 | Why is " Locker Room Talk" Demonized?I don't understand your point. I didn't say all RPillers are Nazis. I said they allow to promotion of Nazi rhetoric, even by their elites. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/07/17 05:43 PM |
| 5 | Why is " Locker Room Talk" Demonized?Look at video games. Women aren't even barred from those, they just don't tend to be as interested. And that's enough to have gamers labeled "problematic" by default. Tell me again, since when are a few American feminists representative of all women? I am pretty sure most women don't even care about video games and at best think people who play them are childish. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/07/17 05:35 PM |
| 1 | Why is " Locker Room Talk" Demonized?I am talking about TRP specifically. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/07/17 05:33 PM |
| 7 | Why is " Locker Room Talk" Demonized?To be fair, I do know some women who make some mean comments about their boyfriends when in a female only environment (not that they ever take it as far as TRPillers do). But what pisses me of is that this "locker room talk", if often used as an excuse for hateful pieces of shit. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/07/17 05:17 PM |
| 3 | Do TRPillers tend to underestimate how social programming can affect what people are attracted to?I just don't get it. You say men are attracted to youth and I agree, but I always thought it was about women who have actually hit puberty. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/07/17 05:02 PM |
| 2 | Do TRPillers tend to underestimate how social programming can affect what people are attracted to?Women over the age of 9-10 stop being young? It just seems weird to me. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/07/17 05:00 PM |
| 2 | Why is " Locker Room Talk" Demonized?How? I see them promoting bullshit all the time and we're supposed to not take it seriously because it's "locker room talk" or whatever. Well, except a lot of people do take it seriously. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/07/17 04:59 PM |
| 3 | Do TRPillers tend to underestimate how social programming can affect what people are attracted to?But hairlessness is not associated with youth. All women over the age of 10 have body hair. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/07/17 04:56 PM |
| 5 | Do TRPillers tend to underestimate how social programming can affect what people are attracted to?How am I stretching? Only children are hairless, not young or teenage women. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/07/17 04:54 PM |
| 5 | Do TRPillers tend to underestimate how social programming can affect what people are attracted to?That makes no sense. Hairlessness is pretty much something only children have. Are men attracted to children now? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/07/17 04:53 PM |
| 0 | Why is " Locker Room Talk" Demonized?"locker room talk" is often an excuse to start pushing all sort of hateful and politically propagandist rhetoric. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/07/17 04:52 PM |
| 1 | Why is " Locker Room Talk" Demonized?I have seen this on /r/TheRedpIll multiple times. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/07/17 04:51 PM |
| 0 | Why is " Locker Room Talk" Demonized?It's not, I have seen plenty of proto-fascist rhetoric on TRP promoted even by Vanguards. Is this what counts as "locker room talk"? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/07/17 04:47 PM |
| 5 | Do TRPillers tend to underestimate how social programming can affect what people are attracted to?Are you saying men are attracted to children? Because teenage women still have hair, only children don't. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/07/17 04:44 PM |
| 1 | Why is " Locker Room Talk" Demonized?"Locker room talk" is promoting Nazi-style biological determinist theories they made up now? And no I am not talking about basic evo psych stuff. I am talking about literal Nazi rhetoric, like in the RP endorsed blog Chateau Heartiste. I disagree with your politics and the propaganda you push is "why you no tolerate locker room talk" now? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/07/17 04:42 PM |
| 3 | Do TRPillers tend to underestimate how social programming can affect what people are attracted to?Yes, but my point was that some RPillers sometimes make it like being attracted to stuff like "long haired woman" and "shaved vagina" are somehow related to biological reasons, when I can't see how that would be the case. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/07/17 04:22 PM |
| 1 | Do TRPillers tend to underestimate how social programming can affect what people are attracted to?Could you expand on that? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/07/17 02:15 PM |
| 1 | CMV: The "no place left for men in the future" idea is a massive hysteria caused by an over-emphasis on the college hook up cultureI wonder if for some it's just a response to the specific MGTOW that basically say they want to murder women and replace them with sex bots and artificial wombs. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/07/17 11:14 AM |
| 3 | Q4BP can you list some things you believe men are inherently better at than women due to biology?Good points. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/07/17 12:47 AM |
| 6 | Q4BP can you list some things you believe men are inherently better at than women due to biology?That doesn't prove it has to do with genetics though. (not saying ti doesn't, just that it's not proof) | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/07/17 12:44 AM |
| 2 | Q4BP can you list some things you believe men are inherently better at than women due to biology?Can you think of something that women are better than men at? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/07/17 11:39 PM |
| 3 | Q4BP can you list some things you believe men are inherently better at than women due to biology?Ah, I see. Well, I personally think men are usually better at everything. Not all men of course, some men are useless. Just in general. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/07/17 10:40 PM |
| 5 | Q4BP can you list some things you believe men are inherently better at than women due to biology?just that in general men would tend to dominate at chess even if boys and girls are raised the same. Source? Not that I doubt it, but it would be nice to see some source on that. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/07/17 10:35 PM |
| 3 | Q4BP: Do you believe in a blank slate?All of these things (brain, chemistry, body) are affected by environmental factors though. And all of our behaviors are influenced both by genes and the environment according to science. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/07/17 10:05 PM |
| 2 | Q4BP: Do you believe in a blank slate?Race realism is not only based on whether "race exists". It's based on a lot of pseudoscience. I also find that race is often ill-defined. The scientific consensus is generally that races aren't useful. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/07/17 09:35 PM |
| 3 | Q4BP: Do you believe in a blank slate?I think there might be some cognitive differences between men and women, if speaking generally. It would be interesting to see some hard proof on this. I found the documentaries on TRP sidebar very interesting. However, the TRP also promotes a lot of pseudoscience and evo psych theories they came up themselves and are not based on actual science. It should also be noted that even evolutionary psychologists don't doubt that the environment plays a role in our development. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/07/17 09:30 PM |
| 3 | Q4BP: Do you believe in a blank slate?I am not sure what you mean in whether they are separate. No they are not. When I talked about body , I meant that bodily structure is affected by environmental factors. Brain structure can be affected too. Does this mean only environment plays a role? Of course not. Genes do play a big role in these things. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/07/17 09:20 PM |
| 3 | Q4BP: Do you believe in a blank slate?The development of the brain can be affected by environmental factors too. Whether IQ is a biological aspect of brain structure, doesn't mean, it's not affected by environmental factors. Even things like height can be affected by environmental factors. Both body and brain are affected by the environment. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/07/17 09:16 PM |
| 2 | Q4BP: Do you believe in a blank slate?Biological determinism and most "race realism" claims are debunked and are taken seriously by no scientist. While it's true there are some psychological differences between the sexes, it doesn't mean biological determinism is right. Biological determinism means ignoring any environmental factors. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/07/17 09:13 PM |
| 3 | Q4BP: Do you believe in a blank slate?IQ is affected negatively by poverty and neglect. https://apa.org/pi/families/resources/newsletter/2012/07/neurocognitive-impacts.aspx http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/268066.php And of course education can affect IQ. http://www.pnas.org/content/109/2/425.full.pdf | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/07/17 09:10 PM |
| 1 | Q4BP: Do you believe in a blank slate?Ah I see. Well, that's nonsense. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/07/17 09:05 PM |
| 3 | Q4BP: Do you believe in a blank slate?I don't understand the question. Nurture plays a role in almost everything. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/07/17 09:03 PM |
| 3 | Q4BP: Do you believe in a blank slate?Except that I didn't say that. That's a strawman. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/07/17 09:01 PM |
| 2 | Q4BP: Do you believe in a blank slate?Dunno. Our environment and life experiences definitely affect how we think and our behaviors up to a point. Things like IQ are also influenced heavily by environment (and scientists agree on that) and even things like height can be influenced by environmental factors. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/07/17 08:57 PM |
| 3 | Q4BP: Do you believe in a blank slate?Also blaming biology for slavery and genocide is as stupid as blaming religion What do you mean? I said biological determinist pseudoscience was used to justify slavery and genocide, which is true. Heritability of traits is a well studied field and is specific to each trait. Yes and scientists agree that both nature and nurture play a role and that biological determinism is pseudoscience. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/07/17 08:55 PM |
| 4 | Q4BP: Do you believe in a blank slate?Believing there is "no big difference" doesn't mean you believe in the blank slate lol. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/07/17 08:45 PM |
| 4 | Q4BP: Do you believe in a blank slate?Who believes in the blank slate? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/07/17 08:42 PM |
| 8 | Q4BP: Do you believe in a blank slate?Well, scientists believe both nature and nurture play a role. Some even argue nurture plays a bigger role. https://phys.org/news/2009-05-nurture-greater-effect-nature.html Biological determinists definitely exist. Have you met many alt-righters? I have seen some of them argue that the Jews are biologically programmed to be parasites. Others believe that leftists are just born that way because of the r/K selection theory (which is the most ridiculous theory I have heard). Historically biological … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/07/17 08:36 PM |
| 5 | Q4BP: Do you believe in a blank slate?Not being a biological determinist doesn't mean you believe in the blank slate though. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/07/17 08:24 PM |
| 4 | Q4BP: Do you believe in a blank slate?Of course not. It has been scientifically proven wrong. Believing there are no psychological differences between the genders, doesn't mean you believe in the blank slate. (not saying I believe there are absolutely no psychological differences between the genders) Not being a biological determinist doesn't mean you believe in the blank slate. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/07/17 08:19 PM |
| 1 | Weekly Offtopic-Sunday Megathread (23 July 2017)What are your thoughts on alt-righters like Andrew Anglin? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/07/17 12:27 PM |
| 1 | Men's view of women's competencyWhat does it have to do with what I'm saying? I personally had a male teachers in many lessons and some of them were my favorite teachers ever. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/07/17 04:51 PM |
| 1 | Men's view of women's competencyI have had similar experiences. My favorite teachers were almost always men and I remember that a lot of other girls thought similarly. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/07/17 04:39 PM |
| 2 | Men's view of women's competencyIn my experience, a lot of girls seem to "love" their fathers more than their mothers. (not saying they don't love their mothers, but I know a lot of "daddy's girls") | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/07/17 04:36 PM |
| 11 | Men's view of women's competencyTo be fair, I always thought that the WAWE had more to do with viewing women as "morally superior" and "innocent" than anything else. That being said, I am not surprised. Some RPillers act like women would be significantly more likely to vote for female political candidates just because of gender bias, but experience tells me otherwise. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/07/17 04:29 PM |
| 2 | Is this RP field report real? Does it sound believable?Oh come on. I wouldn't believe the field reports at TRP. The main reason someone would write a field report at TRP would be to brag and we all know some men like to exaggerate and brag about their sexual successes. I wouldn't trust TRP field reports. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/07/17 11:10 AM |
| 1 | The idea that women are naturally more collectivist than men is wrong (part 2)Libertarianism is in itself masculine though as it uses male strategy lol? Citation needed. There is no solid proof libertarianism has anything to do with masculinity. How come most libertarians I know irl are nerds? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/07/17 02:46 AM |
| 1 | People not fitting into gender roles should be free to do whatever they want, but why identify as a different gender?I have a hard time understanding your perspective, but I am open-minded. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/07/17 02:33 AM |
| 1 | The idea that women are naturally more collectivist than men is wrong (part 2)Most hypermasculine men are not libertarians and "individualist" in my experience. Real masculinity is revolutionary, whether that means fascism or communism. https://www.google.gr/search?q=che+guevara&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&sqi=2&ved=0ahUKEwi_uPfBqJ7VAhUKJ8AKHcXhCpUQ_AUIBigB&biw=1920&bih=984#imgrc=JmeuK8QKIExtCM: Most "libertarians" I know irl are nerds. No offense to you of course, just my experience. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/07/17 02:07 AM |
| 4 | Why do red pillers complain about women not settling down and getting married while simultaneously refusing to ever get married?If we want pensions etc. we do need workers. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/07/17 01:39 AM |
| 1 | /r/TheRedPill is crypto-neoreactionaryI was talking more about the role the US played in the Taliban rise to power, back in the 80s. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/07/17 01:38 AM |
| 3 | Why do red pillers complain about women not settling down and getting married while simultaneously refusing to ever get married?Lowers the chances of successful marriages (and therefore lowers the incentive to work hard for a lot of men), lowers birth rates which hurt the economy in the long term etc. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/07/17 01:35 AM |
| 1 | /r/TheRedPill is crypto-neoreactionaryIn my opinion, western nations should stay out of the business of the Middle East entirely, except in cases where they are a direct threat. Any attempt to interfere has usually ended up in disaster, they should neither support the dictators nor the "protesters", they should just let them be. The war in Iraq, overthrowing Gaddafi, supporting the taliban have obviously been proven to be huge mistakes in the long term. It's not the job of western nations to try to impose "western values" and democr… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/07/17 12:47 AM |
| 1 | People not fitting into gender roles should be free to do whatever they want, but why identify as a different gender?Dunno. It would be nice if you could shed some light on the issue since you're transgender though. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/07/17 12:02 AM |
| 7 | Why do red pillers complain about women not settling down and getting married while simultaneously refusing to ever get married?You probably have to searched enough. Many of them think the sexual revolution was a mistake because it "ruins civilizations". https://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/46pvzc/how_women_destroy_the_west/ Watch this video and read what they're saying. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/07/17 11:50 PM |
| 1 | Why do red pillers complain about women not settling down and getting married while simultaneously refusing to ever get married?I don't understand what you mean. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/07/17 11:38 PM |
| 4 | Why do red pillers complain about women not settling down and getting married while simultaneously refusing to ever get married?The RPillers are often neoreactionary and think that the sexual revolution ruins civilization, yet they encourage it by being PUAs themselves. Is it a double standard? Yes. That being said, the main reason the sexual revolution ruins things, is economic, so I personally don't give a damn as I have no interest in preserving the capitalist system. The only people that have to worry about it are those who want to preserve capitalism. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/07/17 11:29 PM |
| 1 | /r/TheRedPill is crypto-neoreactionaryYour government needs to send secret agents as mufti in their mosques. That's a key factor in controlling them and avoiding terrorism imo and it's what Greece has been doing for decades. It's probably a little too late to send them back now and lets face it. Even if you had elected a far-right government and refused to take in refugees, the other nations would likely punish you, that's what they want to do with Poland, it's deeper than the power the government has. Western imperialism just needs… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/07/17 11:19 PM |
| 1 | /r/TheRedPill is crypto-neoreactionaryI generally agree that Islam is terrible, I don't like it at all. In my country we've had Muslims since 1923 and they have not integrated at all, they feel Turkish despite all of the affirmative action. (at least they haven't caused problems, but I think that's because their mufti are actual a secret agents from the government). In general, if I were completely honest, I would have to say that I don't really like them and I have had very bad experiences with Muslims. Of course, I don't think tha… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/07/17 10:22 PM |
| 1 | Weekly Offtopic-Sunday Megathread (16 July 2017)I have watched his interviews. It's quite obvious that he's biased and he hates communists with a passion. Even if I agree with some of the things he says, I think he;s obviously pushing for "Red scare" type of propaganda by linking SJWism to Marxism even though most SJWs are not Marxists. He's quite obviously a conservative in my view. If his reaction to Frozen doesn't prove it to you, then I don't know what will. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/07/17 10:08 PM |
| 1 | People not fitting into gender roles should be free to do whatever they want, but why identify as a different gender?I am not sure about that. I have a hard time understanding it. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/07/17 10:01 PM |
| 3 | People not fitting into gender roles should be free to do whatever they want, but why identify as a different gender?I personally don't particularly care what they identify as,, but in most of these cases I don't understand the distinction between gender roles and "gender". It seems to me that when they talk about gender they basically mean "gender roles" (for example that they don't want to dress "masculine" even though they were born male). | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/07/17 09:58 PM |
| 3 | People not fitting into gender roles should be free to do whatever they want, but why identify as a different gender?How can someone experience both genders at the same time? How is "gender" any different than gender roles? Do these people have gender dysphoria? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/07/17 09:52 PM |
| 1 | The idea that women are naturally more collectivist than men is wrong (part 2)Good point. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/07/17 09:30 PM |
| 1 | Weekly Offtopic-Sunday Megathread (16 July 2017)Most SJWs are not even communists, they're social liberals and social democrats. Also, he condemns Marxists in general, not just the totalitarian regimes. He has said that Marxists are "arrogant" when they say stuff like "that was not true Marxism". He's quite obviously a conservative. His reaction to Frozen proves that. He hates Frozen because it shows an independent women, oh the horror. Have you watched Frozen? It's not even that feminist. He hates communists and basically blames communists f… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/07/17 09:29 PM |
| 1 | Weekly Offtopic-Sunday Megathread (16 July 2017)He's pretty explicitly anti-communist and bashes Marxists so I don't know why you think he doesn't have a political agenda. Also, yes I think him presenting the progressives as "Neo-Marxists" is dishonest and propagandist. Not to mention how I am not sure why he thinks SJWism is linked so strongly to postmodernism in the first place. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/07/17 06:08 PM |
| 1 | The idea that women are naturally more collectivist than men is wrong (part 2)Sinking their ships is a bit over the top, but we should have probably dent some of them back as long they were not genuine refugees. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/07/17 05:56 PM |
| 1 | Weekly Offtopic-Sunday Megathread (16 July 2017)He links Marxism to postmodernism and promoted the cultural marxism conspiracy theory, acts like all Marxists are postmodernists and all progressives are secret communists. He also thinks that art can never have any sort of political message, well I guess nothing is true art then by his standards. https://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/615e3z/i_am_dr_jordan_b_peterson_u_of_t_professor/dfbz5p4/ I admit I agree with some of the things he says occasionally, but he's also definitely a demagogue with… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/07/17 05:43 PM |
| 1 | The idea that women are naturally more collectivist than men is wrong (part 2)I completely understand some concerns on immigration and I do think there should be some control over immigration. (I am kind of an outlier socialist I guess) I just don't know what could be done. These people were coming with boats in Greece, what were we supposed to do with them exactly? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/07/17 03:44 PM |
| 1 | The idea that women are naturally more collectivist than men is wrong (part 2)Alright, however far-right politics are often based heavily on feelings like fear and nationalism is an idealistic, spiritual-based, mostly collectivist ideology. just wanted to point that out. Someone could make a rational and practical case for nationalism, but most nationalist in my experience react based on emotions and spirituality. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/07/17 02:28 PM |
| 1 | The idea that women are naturally more collectivist than men is wrong (part 2)Well, I have also noticed that men are more likely to be far-right. However, this thread was about individualism vs collectivism. Nationalism and how women view it is another issue as nationalism is a collectivist ideology. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/07/17 02:20 PM |
| 1 | The idea that women are naturally more collectivist than men is wrong (part 2)the far right got 4% among women and 11% among men The far-right is not "individualist" though. Nationalism is a mostly collectivist ideology. Besides is a 7% difference really that big? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/07/17 01:54 PM |
| 1 | Q4RP married couples and ltrs, do you believe your relationship will endure until the day you die? Or are you just enjoying the ride until she cheats on you/ you get bored of each other?I suppose I am RP since I agree with some of their ideas. I don't really expect my relationship to last forever but if it does, then great. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/07/17 01:53 PM |
| 1 | CMV: All college surveys on sexual assault and rape have an incredible bias and cannot be viewed as accurate information.No, I am not calling you a liar but which surveys are these that "equate" them? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/07/17 01:52 PM |
| 1 | The idea that women are naturally more collectivist than men is wrong (part 2)But if women were just naturally more "collectivist" or more "leftist" than men, there would be huge gender differences in who votes for the "collectivist" or the "individualist" parties which doesn't appear to be the case. There are some gender differences in voting, but they're usually not that big. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/07/17 01:47 PM |
| 1 | Weekly Offtopic-Sunday Megathread (16 July 2017)By the way Jordan Peterson is a dishonest demagogue, why do you guys like him so much? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/07/17 12:44 PM |
| 1 | The idea that women are naturally more collectivist than men is wrong (part 2)What are your thoughts on this issue? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/07/17 12:15 PM |
| 1 | Men, how often have women asked your count? Women, how often have asked a man his?I have never been asked my partner count irl. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/07/17 11:44 AM |
| 1 | CMV: All college surveys on sexual assault and rape have an incredible bias and cannot be viewed as accurate information.They don't. However, an ass grab can still be sexual assault. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/07/17 11:43 AM |
| 2 | CMV: All college surveys on sexual assault and rape have an incredible bias and cannot be viewed as accurate information.I don't think you understood. What if the ones who made the survey just defined rape in a very broad way (for example all drunken sex is rape). In this case it wouldn't be the respondents' fault. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/07/17 11:13 AM |
| 2 | CMV: All college surveys on sexual assault and rape have an incredible bias and cannot be viewed as accurate information.Perhaps it's not the respondents' fault, but it has to do with how the ones who made the survey defined rape? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/07/17 10:58 AM |
| 1 | Q4W: Do you decrease your N in conversations with your SO?We have never even discussed it. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/07/17 09:35 AM |
| 3 | CMV: All college surveys on sexual assault and rape have an incredible bias and cannot be viewed as accurate information.I'm surprised that rape is so high and unwanted sexual touching is so low. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/07/17 09:34 AM |
| 1 | The idea that women are naturally more collectivist than men is wrong (part 2)https://www.google.gr/search?q=kasidiaris&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjM7bXyx5zVAhWLKsAKHYptDGYQ_AUICigB&biw=1920&bih=984#tbm=isch&q=kasidiaris+swastiga+tattoo&imgrc=IqvsZzGNYWOfIM: This dude is our MP , does he look masculine and fascist enough? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/07/17 09:21 AM |
| 1 | What's the point of "people from 'X' are more likely to be/do 'A' than people from from 'Y'" statistics?I remember in classes they explicitly told us that scientists agree that both biology and the environment play a role in human development. Of course social scientists wouldn't focus on biological differences because that isn't their job. A professor had recommended us to attend a feminist seminar but it wasn't even mandatory. They were just teaching us the theories of various social scientists and how to analyse statistics. We had an entire class just for understanding capitalism and the book e… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/07/17 12:28 AM |
| 1 | What's the point of "people from 'X' are more likely to be/do 'A' than people from from 'Y'" statistics?I studied sociology at university for a year, I can tell you that social scientists are not nearly as "leftist" and biased as some of you people are making them out to be, at least in Greece, but I doubt that American universities are significantly different. They don't completely ignore more biological determinist theories and they definitely don't promote the theory that people are born tabula rasa, that's not the job of sociologists. Sociologists know that biology might play a role on a lot o… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/07/17 12:02 AM |
| 1 | What's the point of "people from 'X' are more likely to be/do 'A' than people from from 'Y'" statistics?I meant I don't agree with them suppressing science, assuming their actually do that. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 11:43 PM |
| 1 | What's the point of "people from 'X' are more likely to be/do 'A' than people from from 'Y'" statistics?Well, yes I personally don't agree with this. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 11:22 PM |
| 1 | The idea that women are naturally more collectivist than men is wrong (part 2)Hahaha, I really like that channel. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 11:16 PM |
| 1 | The idea that women are naturally more collectivist than men is wrong (part 2)Yes, but a 10% difference doesn't say much about the natural differences between men and women. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 10:53 PM |
| 2 | Weekly Offtopic-Sunday Megathread (16 July 2017)Seriously, why do some people here say I am a misandrist? I have seen at least 4-5 people saying I am a misandrist, where the hell does this view come from? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 10:32 PM |
| 2 | Q4ALL: What common things that are said on this sub make you sad?Why do you think I am a misandrist? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 10:31 PM |
| 1 | The idea that women are naturally more collectivist than men is wrong (part 2)In my country the stereotype is that hypermasculine men are far-right nationalists ad fascists. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 10:30 PM |
| 1 | The idea that women are naturally more collectivist than men is wrong (part 2)Are most men against feminism or equality outside of here? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 09:47 PM |
| 1 | The idea that women are naturally more collectivist than men is wrong (part 2)Ok, proof? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 09:35 PM |
| 1 | The idea that women are naturally more collectivist than men is wrong (part 2)Where is the hard proof that men are more individualist than women? 10% difference in voting doesn't mean much. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 09:26 PM |
| 1 | The idea that women are naturally more collectivist than men is wrong (part 2)What hard proof do you have that men are more individualist "economically". There is no significant gender gap between leftist and rightist voters. 10% difference is not that big. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 09:24 PM |
| 1 | The idea that women are naturally more collectivist than men is wrong (part 2)I never said that I think collectivism is wrong. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 09:16 PM |
| 1 | The idea that women are naturally more collectivist than men is wrong (part 2)You can't discuss gender issues as if they corresponded to class as men and women are equally represented in each class, unless you count homeless as a class. It's not that simple. Women (especially single women) are more likely to benefit from welfare for a variety of reasons. Married women are more right-wing therefore they do vote what benefits them. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 09:14 PM |
| 1 | The idea that women are naturally more collectivist than men is wrong (part 2)There is no real evidence that men value "individualism" and "freedom" more than women, unless you think that women being 10% more likely to vote for more welfare proves something. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 06:00 PM |
| 1 | The idea that women are naturally more collectivist than men is wrong (part 2)If these men didn't benefit from "individualist" policies, would they still vote for these policies? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 05:54 PM |
| 1 | The idea that women are naturally more collectivist than men is wrong (part 2)According to this logic, women vote for their own interests too. Therefore women are also "individualist". Do you think people voting for leftist parties has nothing to do with these people protecting their interests? Besides the difference in % of men and women voting for left-leaning parties is not that big. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 05:46 PM |
| 1 | The idea that women are naturally more collectivist than men is wrong (part 2)men join ISIS and organizations like it primarily because they're sexually frustrated and have very little to lose. What proof do you have of this? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 05:46 PM |
| 1 | The idea that women are naturally more collectivist than men is wrong (part 2)My point was that TRPillers say that women are naturally more collectivist because they're more likely to vote for leftist parties, as if right-wing parties never want to control people. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 05:44 PM |
| 1 | The idea that women are naturally more collectivist than men is wrong (part 2)Right-wingers often want to censor people, this is not only a leftist thing. In my country they imprison you for blasphemy, in fact there was recently a case of an atheist going to jail for blasphemy. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 05:41 PM |
| 1 | The idea that women are naturally more collectivist than men is wrong (part 2)Many of these men were leftists in their youth and turned conservative only later in their lives. If men are just "natural" individualists, how do you explain that? Where is the proof that men don't vote for the right simply to protect their own interests? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 05:39 PM |
| 1 | The idea that women are naturally more collectivist than men is wrong (part 2)Doesn't matter. My point is that collectivist movements have been primarily led by men. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 05:34 PM |
| 1 | The idea that women are naturally more collectivist than men is wrong (part 2)The collectivism vs individualism thing is a false dichotomy in the first place. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 05:34 PM |
| 1 | The idea that women are naturally more collectivist than men is wrong (part 2)The only real "individualism" right-libertarians accept is "right-wing individualism". Only a small minority around the world actually follows this ideology. Therefore saying that men are more individualist by nature is absurd. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 05:32 PM |
| 1 | The idea that women are naturally more collectivist than men is wrong (part 2)So men are willingly joining ISIS, a highly collectivist movement and nobody is forcing them to do it. How do you explain that? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 05:30 PM |
| 1 | The idea that women are naturally more collectivist than men is wrong (part 2)If most collectivist movements have been led by men, how can someone make the case that men are just naturally more "individualist" than women? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 05:28 PM |
| 1 | The idea that women are naturally more collectivist than men is wrong (part 2)Individualism is the idea that "individual rights" are more important than collective control. It has nothing to do with men being competitive. Men are highly collectivist, just look at how many men are willing to sacrifice themselves for X cause. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 05:24 PM |
| 1 | The idea that women are naturally more collectivist than men is wrong (part 2)Women are quite likely to throw men under the bus if it means they will be saved. Women are competitive with one another all the time. I have had friendships with women and I can tell you that women are competitive with one another. The fact that they're less violent is another issue. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 05:19 PM |
| 1 | The idea that women are naturally more collectivist than men is wrong (part 2)I still don't see how that proves that women are somehow more "collectivist" than men. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 05:13 PM |
| 1 | The idea that women are naturally more collectivist than men is wrong (part 2)Men have also been more likely to sacrifice themselves for the good of the tribe, the nation, the family, the community etc. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 05:09 PM |
| 4 | The idea that women are naturally more collectivist than men is wrong (part 2)What a stupid theory. In hunters-gatherers societies both men and women worked to accumulate resources (women were the gatherers) and everyone was "collectivist". | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 05:08 PM |
| 0 | The idea that women are naturally more collectivist than men is wrong (part 2)Men have been throwing each under the bus since before anyone What? If anything men had to cooperate to take care of the hunting and protecting the tribe. Your interpretation of manhood is false. Men can be very cooperative with one another. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 05:03 PM |
| 1 | The idea that women are naturally more collectivist than men is wrong (part 2)Welfare is not socialism. Socialism is a system where the workers own the means of production and not the capitalist. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 05:00 PM |
| -1 | The idea that women are naturally more collectivist than men is wrong (part 2)So rich people are less collectivist than poor people. Women are poorer than men. You think that explains any difference. So you don't think that people who own capital are more likely to vote for less taxes? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 04:55 PM |
| 8 | Q4Women: What do you think are the messages of the Disney movies that you watched as a child? What were the messages exactly? And how much of an impact do you think these messages had on your life?Disney is Red Pill: The Hunchback of Notre Dame: The hot dude got the girl, Quasimodo ended up alone. Snow White: How to be RPW. Aladdin: Aladdin was alpha, I don't care what you guys say but he definitely had confidence and guts. Cinderella: Be RPW and earn a hot, rich prince. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 04:14 PM |
| 2 | Is BP -> RP or RP -> BP transformation more likely?Kind of an exaggeration, don't you think? Trudeau is a leader and you people call him Blue Pill, don't you? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 02:35 PM |
| 1 | Is BP -> RP or RP -> BP transformation more likely?Implying that BPillers can't be "leader-like" and "confident". | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 02:31 PM |
| 1 | What's the point of "people from 'X' are more likely to be/do 'A' than people from from 'Y'" statistics?Yes, they cherry-pick studies and interpret them however it suits them. They often do the same with historical events (for example they say that Rome collapsed because of women, ignoring everything else) | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 02:24 PM |
| 1 | CMV: Rising sexual inequality among males could have disastrous political and social consequences for Western societies.Golden Dawn are actually stereotyped as hypermasculine and macho. They are not incels. I don't think we have that many incels in Greece, we're the most sexually active nation according to studies. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 02:09 PM |
| 1 | Is BP -> RP or RP -> BP transformation more likely?What? People are not born with knowledge of their "evolutionary instincts". Being RP supposedly means having knowledge of your "instincts", otherwise it doesn't count. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 02:05 PM |
| 3 | CMV: Rising sexual inequality among males could have disastrous political and social consequences for Western societies.It's long been known that economic disparity fuels crime, poverty, distrust in institutions and a resulting rise in authoritarian tendencies. Do you think the same could potentially be true of sexual disparity? This is the full quote. So again, what do the problems of my country have to do with incels? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 01:49 PM |
| 5 | Q4ALL: What's a double standard you see the opposite gender exhibit more times than not?I think the biggest for me is with cheating. When a man cheats it's because he is shallow, and is a pig and is just like "All the other guys!", it's never because the woman did something wrongs Meanwhile when a woman cheats its always directly because the man was an asshole and didn't satisfy her enough. Seems like a guy just can't win in the cheating argument. Is that argument really that prevalent and common? I have seen many people ranting about female infidelity. Anyway, one double standard … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 01:48 PM |
| 4 | CMV: Rising sexual inequality among males could have disastrous political and social consequences for Western societies.The original quote had to do with "sexual disparity". What does it have to do? Modern Greece has been facing numerous problems before women could even vote. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 01:44 PM |
| 4 | CMV: Rising sexual inequality among males could have disastrous political and social consequences for Western societies.Yes and what does this have to do with incels? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 01:38 PM |
| 2 | CMV: Rising sexual inequality among males could have disastrous political and social consequences for Western societies.Yes and? What is your point? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 01:36 PM |
| 2 | What's the point of "people from 'X' are more likely to be/do 'A' than people from from 'Y'" statistics?What bothers me isn't the use of these statistics but that they immediately assume it has to do purely with biological factors ignoring any alternative or any studies that suggest otherwise. I am not someone who supports the tabula rasa narrative and I do think there are some general differences between men and women but some people here take it too far and become hardcore biological determinists with only thin evidence to support their claims. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 01:12 PM |
| 2 | Q4ALL: Do you have many friends of the opposite sex?If we count our siblings then I have to say me and my brother are definitely close friends. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 12:27 PM |
| 3 | CMV: Feminism's full-throated defense of Islam completely and utterly debunks feminist ideals and goalsWell then, they're total morons. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 12:21 PM |
| 1 | CMV: Feminism's full-throated defense of Islam completely and utterly debunks feminist ideals and goalsWhat feminist textbook glorified the hijab? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 12:14 PM |
| 2 | CMV: Feminism's full-throated defense of Islam completely and utterly debunks feminist ideals and goalsThese people are usually liberal feminists, not leftists. Besides I am doubting how common it truly is to "glorify the hijab". Very mainstream how? Because Huffington Post posted an articles saying Muhammad was a feminist? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 12:11 PM |
| 2 | CMV: Feminism's full-throated defense of Islam completely and utterly debunks feminist ideals and goalsPrimitive hunters'gatherers societies were close to being communist, so it's not like communism is "against human nature" or anything. http://econweb.ucsd.edu/~carsonvs/papers/41.pdf https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primitive_communism I think it can work and it did work for a while in the communities I mentioned (revolutionary Catalonia, The Paris commune) which were defeated by outside forces, not by internal collapse. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 12:09 PM |
| 1 | CMV: Feminism's full-throated defense of Islam completely and utterly debunks feminist ideals and goalsIf you are not against capitalism, you're not a leftist, it's as simple as that. Besides, how common is it for feminists to "glorify" the hijab and Islam in general? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 11:59 AM |
| 3 | CMV: Feminism's full-throated defense of Islam completely and utterly debunks feminist ideals and goalsI personally agree that Muslims are more likely to commit sexual assault and I think many leftists secretly know that. They're against promoting this kind of stereotypes for practical reasons. For example, does stereotyping Muslims as potential sex offenders really help anyone at this point? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 11:56 AM |
| 2 | CMV: Feminism's full-throated defense of Islam completely and utterly debunks feminist ideals and goalsYou're acting as if social liberals, leftists and capitalist opportunists are one and the same. Much of this "glorification" is coming from capitalists who either see it as profitable or are social liberals themselves. For example, NIKE has released a hijab for Muslim athletes, what does it have to do with leftists? Geroge Soros is a social liberal but saying he's a leftist is ridiculous. Hillary is a social liberal but leftists hate her. Many capitalist corporations are promoting progressivism … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 11:54 AM |
| 2 | CMV: Feminism's full-throated defense of Islam completely and utterly debunks feminist ideals and goalsI mean nobody really wants a violent revolution but I am unconvinced that things will really change without some form of revolution, although I would hope so. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 11:48 AM |
| 2 | CMV: Feminism's full-throated defense of Islam completely and utterly debunks feminist ideals and goalsI am from Greece. I don't know when the revolution will happen, but I definitely think there will be some socialist revolutions in the future. I hope that when it happens, it will inspire other revolutions worldwide. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 11:24 AM |
| 2 | CMV: Feminism's full-throated defense of Islam completely and utterly debunks feminist ideals and goalsCommunism is meant to be a stateless system with separate communes where people use direct democracy to make decisions. Communities that were close to this were in Revolutionary Catalonia and the Paris commune. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 11:06 AM |
| 2 | CMV: Feminism's full-throated defense of Islam completely and utterly debunks feminist ideals and goalsI don't hate capitalists, I hate the capitalist system. Hopefully, when the revolution happens, the capitalists will peacefully cooperate with us in order to avoid violence. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 10:31 AM |
| 2 | CMV: Feminism's full-throated defense of Islam completely and utterly debunks feminist ideals and goalsOkay then when was the last time right-wingers did anything to address discrimination against minorities? That there are people who are just less likely to hire blacks or women ? Oh right, they never do anything to address it. They only care about discrimination against the white male. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 10:29 AM |
| 3 | CMV: Feminism's full-throated defense of Islam completely and utterly debunks feminist ideals and goalsNo. But the point is many of these anti-Islam people want to discriminate against Muslims in general. They portray all Muslims as potential terrorists which is ridiculous. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 10:17 AM |
| 1 | Q4ALL: Do you have many friends of the opposite sex?Not really. I used to hang out with some guys, but we weren't really close friends. It didn't affect my dating life at all. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 10:16 AM |
| 4 | CMV: Feminism's full-throated defense of Islam completely and utterly debunks feminist ideals and goalsThere are white Muslims, but the same people who are anti-Muslim often worry about things like "white genocide" etc. So you can't deny that race often plays a role. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 10:05 AM |
| 1 | CMV: Feminism's full-throated defense of Islam completely and utterly debunks feminist ideals and goalsMuslims are often targeted for being non-white. Besides a lot of leftists just reject discrimination based on religion alone. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 10:00 AM |
| 3 | CMV: Feminism's full-throated defense of Islam completely and utterly debunks feminist ideals and goalsMuslim groups like ISIS just hate the West and its values in general. That's why you have the alt-right popping up as a reactionary group. Since when do leftists support ISIS? Are you aware that many anarcho-communists from all over the world went to FIGHT ISIS? http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/american-anarchists-ypg-kurdish-militia-syria-isis-islamic-state-w466069 Again, who said otherwise? That doesn't change the fact that leftist ideology still discriminates against people. The … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 09:58 AM |
| 2 | CMV: Feminism's full-throated defense of Islam completely and utterly debunks feminist ideals and goalsAgain, so what? At a political level do you believe affirmative action is supported by the left or right? Capitalist corporations are not leftist. At best, they're "social liberals". So what? It's still flat out open discrimination. I don't support affirmative action but you have to admit it's not the same thing. Where? When? Have you been living under a rock? It happens all the time. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/01/30/quebec-mosque-shooting-two-students-arrested-gun-attack-mosque/ Also … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 09:42 AM |
| 2 | CMV: Feminism's full-throated defense of Islam completely and utterly debunks feminist ideals and goalsAffirmative action for a start... literally giving more jobs to people because of their gender or race, but that's okay because it's discriminating in favour of minorities. First of all, affirmative action is based on the idea that these minorities are discriminated against in the first place. Second of all, in a lot of cases this "affirmative action" is done by capitalist companies to boost their image. What do leftists have to do with capitalists being capitalist? Also, how exactly do you thin… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 09:32 AM |
| 2 | CMV: Feminism's full-throated defense of Islam completely and utterly debunks feminist ideals and goalsAnd yet leftists themselves discriminate against white male Christians all the time lol. How? Some people ranting on twitter is discrimination? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 09:16 AM |
| 3 | CMV: Feminism's full-throated defense of Islam completely and utterly debunks feminist ideals and goalsNo, it isn't. Leftists tend to believe that people shouldn't be discriminated against based on their religious beliefs alone. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 09:07 AM |
| 1 | Do you think casual sex is bad for society?I think you exaggerate how bad it is, but to each his own. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 08:57 AM |
| 3 | CMV: Feminism's full-throated defense of Islam completely and utterly debunks feminist ideals and goalsYes because they don't want Muslims to be targeted? Besides, I don't think most leftists disagree with reforming Islam, only a vocal minority does. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 08:53 AM |
| 4 | CMV: Feminism's full-throated defense of Islam completely and utterly debunks feminist ideals and goalsI don't think most feminists support Islam, they just believe Muslims shouldn't be targeted by racism etc. that's all. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 08:49 AM |
| 1 | Do you think casual sex is bad for society?That's why I support socialism. With future automation, things will be really difficult for the lower classes and I am unconvinced UBI will solve things. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 08:36 AM |
| 1 | Do you think casual sex is bad for society?Look, I agree that maybe they shouldn't have taken in so many people but what's done is done and it should be noted that in some cases right-wing governments were in power when it happened (the Tories in Britain for example). When people are coming by boat, you can't just let them drown. You have to try to integrate them and find them something to do. I am sure there is some low skilled labor available in these countries. Just leaving them in ghettos only makes things worse. Racist and violent a… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 07:39 AM |
| 7 | CMV: Feminism's full-throated defense of Islam completely and utterly debunks feminist ideals and goalsNo. Feminists are just usually leftists so they see that Muslims are unfairly targeted because of the actions of a few, that's why they defend them. By the way most people laugh at Huffington Post, come on... | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 07:03 AM |
| 2 | CMV: Rising sexual inequality among males could have disastrous political and social consequences for Western societies.It's long been known that economic disparity fuels crime, poverty, distrust in institutions and a resulting rise in authoritarian tendencies. Do you think the same could potentially be true of sexual disparity? I have not seen such a correlation. Do we have evidence that incel people are more likely to be violent and criminal? What factors do you think drive sexual inequality? Women are just more picky. They have higher standards because of hypergamy and because their sex drive is different. Are… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 07:01 AM |
| 1 | Do you think casual sex is bad for society?I am sure they will eventually find some low skilled labor to do. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/17 06:56 AM |
| 0 | Q4ALL: What common things that are said on this sub make you sad?I saw two guys recently. This guy: https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/6nwvyj/cmv_the_vast_majority_of_crap_that_men_put_up/dkdm9bx/ And the other one was an incel whose comments have got deleted. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/07/17 09:34 PM |
| 2 | Do you think casual sex is bad for society?You don't see a problem with importing people with scientifically confirmed lower intelligence Proof? You know that it has been documented that poverty affects intelligence right? In my country we have had a Turkish minority since 1923, how come there have never been terrorist attacks? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/07/17 09:18 PM |
| 2 | Q4ALL: What common things that are said on this sub make you sad?I have never been a misandrist, in fact I can't stand misandrists. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/07/17 09:16 PM |
| 2 | Do you think casual sex is bad for society?Send them back where? To Turkey? But Turkey didn't want so many of them in the first place. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/07/17 04:08 PM |
| 1 | Do you think casual sex is bad for society?But if none of the mainstream political forces will even contemplate anything but open borders Since when? There was a huge backlash during the refugee crisis. What other choice did the politicians have when Turkey was just sending people with boats? Let them drown? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/07/17 04:03 PM |
| 1 | Do you think casual sex is bad for society?Just because Muslims are having more kids, doesn't mean they will continue doing so. Things like education, being raised out of poverty and integration can lower birth rates. Besides what is the right-wing solution to the problem? Discrimination based on religion? Violence displacement of people based on their religion? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/07/17 04:01 PM |
| 1 | Do you think casual sex is bad for society?We did fuck up in some ways. But people like Molyneux really exaggerate the problem. It's wrong to paint every Muslim as a potential terrorist, nothing good will come out of it. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/07/17 03:57 PM |
| 1 | Do you think casual sex is bad for society?It's more complicated than that. In some cases I agree we shouldn't have taken in so many people, but it was rightful to help the refugees imo. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/07/17 03:54 PM |
| 2 | Q4ALL: Do you believe bitchy women are more likely to succeed (in work and relationships) than nice women?It depends on how you see it. I imagine some sociopathic women manage to be "successful" in some ways but I imagine that a lot of bad-tempered women also end up miserable. It's the same with men really. You can say that assholes always win, but it's clearly not true. There are some assholes that are losers. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/07/17 03:52 PM |
| 2 | Do you think casual sex is bad for society?Well then perhaps we need to calculate where we have failed and try to improve? It seems like a better solution than you know, promoting racism that can lead to more violence or forcibly displacing millions of people that can lead to even more terrorism and war. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/07/17 03:48 PM |
| 2 | Do you think casual sex is bad for society?They are saying that more workers are needed for the economy to work in the future, not that they will replace the original population. By the year 2050 it is estimated that the Muslims will be the 10% in Europe. Oh no! The 10%??? By the year 2050? I am so so scared. Besides I am not the one wanting to maintain the current economic system. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/07/17 03:47 PM |
| 1 | Do you think casual sex is bad for society?Citation needed. How can they be integrated if they are jihadists? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/07/17 03:42 PM |
| 2 | Do you think casual sex is bad for society?Yes, poverty sucks. Religious fanatics are terrible. So perhaps the solution is educating them and integrating them instead of kicking everyone out something that can lead to more violence? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/07/17 03:41 PM |
| 1 | Do you think casual sex is bad for society?Oh no! They're replacing us. Wait, are they? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kVFeDtbXdCw&t=2s | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/07/17 03:33 PM |
| 3 | Do you think casual sex is bad for society?Oh really? How come? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/07/17 03:31 PM |
| 2 | Do you think casual sex is bad for society?I know right. I really cringe when I hear them call Greece a "socialist" country. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/07/17 02:42 PM |
| 7 | Q4ALL: What common things that are said on this sub make you sad?Two guys in the last two weeks apparently. Also, I didn't say i approve of the morons who want to kill men, but we were talking about this sub specifically. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/07/17 02:35 PM |
| 0 | Do you think casual sex is bad for society?He seems more worried about saving the "white race" nowadays than about markets. He promotes typical right-wing fear-mongering about how Germany and Sweden are basically under Sharia already. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/07/17 02:31 PM |
| 4 | Do you think casual sex is bad for society?Yes, but I don't want the current society to survive. I want a transition into a better society. The reason casual sex is bad is because it damages the chances of having a successful marriage with kids and where the man works like a slave to support the capitalist system and his kids will have to grow up to become proper wage slaves too. Well, fuck that. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/07/17 02:05 PM |
| 8 | Q4ALL: What common things that are said on this sub make you sad?It just makes me sad that some people are so hateful. Misandry and misogyny are despicable in my view. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/07/17 01:58 PM |
| 4 | Q4ALL: What common things that are said on this sub make you sad?A guy with a Red Pill flair basically said women should be killed just two days ago and he linked this. http://www.debate.org/opinions/should-we-kill-all-women A couple of weeks ago an incel dude who was definitely Red Pill advocated for the same thing, so I believe it's becoming a common argument slowly. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/07/17 01:52 PM |
| 10 | Q4ALL: What common things that are said on this sub make you sad?It saddens me when I read about how hard some aspects of life are for men and also when I see people saying that women are the root of basically all evil and that female sexuality is basically "evil" in some way. Some people basically advocate for killing all women because they're useless and evil and that they should be replaced with artificial wombs and sex bots. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/07/17 01:47 PM |
| 2 | What's the worst thing a man has done to you while you were with them?I remember that my ex had insulted me in front of my parents. My father had got furious. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/07/17 06:57 AM |
| 2 | Q4ALL: What's the nicest thing a partner has ever done for you?He drives me around often. I didn't even ask him to, but I',m glad he does it. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/07/17 06:56 AM |
| 0 | /r/TheRedPill is crypto-neoreactionaryUsers of TRP not being neoreactionary, doesn't mean TRP isn't meant to be. You telling me that "most guys don't care", doesn't prove anything about TRP and I already pointed out that TRP is neoreactionary, even on the sidebar. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/07/17 06:52 AM |
| 1 | /r/TheRedPill is crypto-neoreactionaryThey promote all the time the idea that society will collapse and that the Muslims are going to take over and enforce Sharia. I don't know if that's NRX propaganda or just fascist propaganda. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/07/17 10:00 PM |
| 1 | /r/TheRedPill is crypto-neoreactionaryWell, then it seems like the neoreactionary propaganda failed. Because a lot of RPillers are openly fascist. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/07/17 09:18 PM |
| 1 | CMV: Male sexuality is inherently oppressive.No, no, no. Men are that way because they needed to prove themselves to women. We wouldn't have achieved anything without the male sex drive. In fact we would have gone extinct if men didn't desire to hunt, fight , protect the tribe and prove themselves. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/07/17 09:06 PM |
| 1 | /r/TheRedPill is crypto-neoreactionaryMy perception is that neoreactionary types are more likely to end up supporting fascism as an alternative. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/07/17 09:03 PM |
| 7 | CMV: The female sexual experience is FAR superior to the male one, assuming that the woman is able to orgasm and her partner is competent and the chemistry is good. Therefore, women should feel extremely lucky.If female sexual experience was so superior, wouldn't women be more into sex? I don't know. I personally think men enjoy sex more, but then again I have never orgasmed during sex. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/07/17 08:53 PM |
| 1 | What civilizations were destroyed by females?Most men are betas. Betaness is more representative of manhood than alphaness. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/07/17 08:49 PM |
| 1 | /r/TheRedPill is crypto-neoreactionaryMy argument was that neoreactionary though can lead to fascism, not that NRX is fascist. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/07/17 08:46 PM |
| 1 | /r/TheRedPill is crypto-neoreactionaryThe fact that not all RPillers are neoreactionaries, doesn't mean that TRP itself isn't meant to be neoreactionary. That's what you can't seem to understand. Look at The Misandry Bubble on TRP sidebar, it definitely has neoreactionary connotations. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/07/17 08:45 PM |
| 0 | /r/TheRedPill is crypto-neoreactionarySo are we going to pretend that RPW is not part of TRP despite the fact that it's monitored by TRP moderators? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/07/17 08:43 PM |
| 1 | /r/TheRedPill is crypto-neoreactionaryFrom the NRX perspective the fundamental issue is that democracy is wrong. A patriarchal democracy might satisfy old white republicans, but to an NRX it wouldn't be a solution at all. Since when do TRPillers like democracy? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/07/17 08:43 PM |
| 1 | /r/TheRedPill is crypto-neoreactionaryNeoreactionaries call themselves that actually. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/07/17 05:24 PM |
| 1 | /r/TheRedPill is crypto-neoreactionarySJWism is an American thing. I haven't seen people take it so seriously here and I know some extreme leftists. We have too many problems to care about oppression olympics. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/07/17 05:16 PM |
| 1 | /r/TheRedPill is crypto-neoreactionaryWon't they find something to do to contribute to the economy though? Doesn't Germany have any low skilled labor that they can eventually take over? Meh, I think about it this way: automation is going to start taking over the following decades anyway, so the current economic system would be unsustainable regardless. There have to be some changes in the future. You're also assuming that the Muslims will not mostly integrate. How sure are we that this will be the case? As about the civil-war like c… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/07/17 04:58 PM |
| 1 | /r/TheRedPill is crypto-neoreactionaryhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kVFeDtbXdCw I just watched this great video about whether the "they're replacing us" argument has any basis. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/07/17 04:25 PM |
| 2 | Has social media created a society of narcisst?Yes, I think it's making things worse. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/07/17 03:38 PM |
| 1 | /r/TheRedPill is crypto-neoreactionarySome people seem to disagree for some reason. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/07/17 03:31 PM |
| 1 | /r/TheRedPill is crypto-neoreactionaryI didn't say every RPiller is neoreactionary. I said /r/TheRedPill is promoting neoreactionary propaganda. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/07/17 02:31 PM |
| 1 | /r/TheRedPill is crypto-neoreactionaryTRP was what got me interested in the neoreactionsphere in the first place. (even though I am not a neoreactionary) | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/07/17 02:01 PM |
| 1 | /r/TheRedPill is crypto-neoreactionaryI am not even a BPiller, but I don't know why people deny TRP has been promoting neoreactionary propaganda for ages, even in the sidebar in some ways. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/07/17 01:58 PM |
| 5 | Which society would you rather live in, a patriarchal or matriarchal society?Has there ever been a real matriarchal society? Even some tribal societies were not exactly matriarchal. Anyway, if I had to choose between the two, I would pick a patriarchal society. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/07/17 01:13 PM |
| 1 | /r/TheRedPill is crypto-neoreactionaryits another grasp at how to make any non communist red pill stuff evil and bad. Just from the source. No? I never said that TRPillers should be promoting any political agenda. I am simply calling them out for promoting a specific agenda, even on the sidebar. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/07/17 01:07 PM |
| 3 | /r/TheRedPill is crypto-neoreactionaryAlright, maybe I misunderstood. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/07/17 12:16 PM |
| 2 | /r/TheRedPill is crypto-neoreactionaryAd hominem: attacking an opponent's character rather than answering his argument. Now I might have misunderstood his comment but it seems to me like he was implying women are stupid because of what I said there. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/07/17 11:59 AM |
| 1 | /r/TheRedPill is crypto-neoreactionaryGood. It pisses me off that people don't admit the truth. Very dishonest. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/07/17 11:48 AM |
| 1 | /r/TheRedPill is crypto-neoreactionaryOk so you agree that The Red Pill is promoting neoreactionary propaganda? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/07/17 11:33 AM |
| 2 | /r/TheRedPill is crypto-neoreactionaryIf it's not meant to be political, why do they subtly promote political propaganda, even on the sidebar? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/07/17 11:07 AM |
| 3 | /r/TheRedPill is crypto-neoreactionaryhttps://ladyimperium.wordpress.com/2014/09/24/why-is-the-patriarchy-needed/ This used to be in TRPW sidebar. It advocates for the patriarchy. How is that not neoreactionary thought? https://ladyimperium.wordpress.com/2016/04/15/why-feminism-destroys-nations/ This has also been promoted in the RPW sub. Again pro-patriarchy neoreactionary thought about how without the patriarchy, civilizations inevitably collapse. https://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/46pvzc/how_women_destroy_the_west/ How … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/07/17 10:48 AM |
| 0 | /r/TheRedPill is crypto-neoreactionaryShouldn't the answers use evidence to prove their claim? Because I can provide explanation why my opinion is true. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/07/17 10:38 AM |
| 2 | /r/TheRedPill is crypto-neoreactionaryEither refute what I said or don't. Stop using ad hominem. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/07/17 10:31 AM |
| 1 | /r/TheRedPill is crypto-neoreactionaryWhat do you mean? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/07/17 09:22 AM |
| 0 | /r/TheRedPill is crypto-neoreactionaryNo, theredpill promotes neoreactionary propaganda too. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/07/17 08:54 AM |
| 3 | /r/TheRedPill is crypto-neoreactionaryNeoreactionaries are Dark Enlightenment types. "Crypto" means secret. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/07/17 08:41 AM |
| 1 | What civilizations were destroyed by females?There is no problem with a white environment. I just pointed out you sounded entitled. Like "women have to work, therefore I can't say sexist and racist stuff anymore while working". | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/07/17 04:40 PM |
| 1 | RP comment from popular blog I do see some truth in. Uses Esther Vilar quote to prove point.Having ingroup bias doesn't mean that women don't like men. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/07/17 04:36 PM |
| 2 | RP comment from popular blog I do see some truth in. Uses Esther Vilar quote to prove point.Nah, women do like men in a non-sexual way. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/07/17 04:32 PM |
| 3 | RP comment from popular blog I do see some truth in. Uses Esther Vilar quote to prove point.Ahh, if we're talking about mating. I agree women aren't attracted to most men. Women do "like" men in general even if they're not attracted to them, they don't white knight men usually because they don't have to. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/07/17 04:30 PM |
| 3 | RP comment from popular blog I do see some truth in. Uses Esther Vilar quote to prove point.What is WKing and PKing? So, long story short, women on average really don't like men on average, on a basic, biological level. They really don't, there's no two ways about it, and that's why women have an infinitely easier dating life. Not being attracted to most men=women just don't like most men? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/07/17 04:22 PM |
| 4 | RP comment from popular blog I do see some truth in. Uses Esther Vilar quote to prove point.Women are more picky than men because they are attracted to the ones with good genes, while men are way less picky because their strategy is to spread their genes as much as possible. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/07/17 04:13 PM |
| 6 | RP comment from popular blog I do see some truth in. Uses Esther Vilar quote to prove point.Because women are way more picky than men? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/07/17 04:04 PM |
| 2 | Q4Women: Does male sexuality disgust you?No. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/07/17 03:55 PM |
| 1 | CMV: Women are inferior to menTbh I tend to agree. It always seems to me like people who say women are not overall inferior are just beating around the bush. That being said, it doesn't mean that all women are inferior to all men, that should be obvious. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/07/17 03:48 PM |
| 3 | CMV: The vast majority of crap that men put up with is the fault of more powerful men.k. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/07/17 01:55 PM |
| 3 | CMV: The vast majority of crap that men put up with is the fault of more powerful men.So what? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/07/17 01:49 PM |
| 3 | CMV: The vast majority of crap that men put up with is the fault of more powerful men.Good for us that we have so many male comrades then. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sMoUQh1nCsk | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/07/17 01:29 PM |
| 3 | CMV: The vast majority of crap that men put up with is the fault of more powerful men.Disgusting. Just take your MGTOW friends and go create your own commune please. Otherwise, people like you will be put against the wall and shot like the rest of the fascists. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/07/17 01:25 PM |
| 2 | CMV: The vast majority of crap that men put up with is the fault of more powerful men.Why exactly do you dislike women so much? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/07/17 01:20 PM |
| 2 | CMV: The vast majority of crap that men put up with is the fault of more powerful men.Why kill women when you would be able to have male only communes where women wouldn't be bothering you? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/07/17 01:13 PM |
| 2 | CMV: The vast majority of crap that men put up with is the fault of more powerful men.In communism you would be free to create male only communes if you find like-minded men. Just saying. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/07/17 01:11 PM |
| 1 | CMV: The vast majority of crap that men put up with is the fault of more powerful men.So lets just displace the elites and create separate communes that will be run by direct democracy? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/07/17 01:09 PM |
| 1 | Accused Student in Columbia "Mattress Girl" Case Receives Settlement: People on Facebook are Not Pleased in the LeastHe's making it seem like all women would agree with this behavior. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/07/17 12:04 PM |
| 6 | RP comment from popular blog I do see some truth in. Uses Esther Vilar quote to prove point.Women really like men, I don't know why people would think otherwise. The fact that women are people and therefore are looking out for their self-interest, something that most men do too given the chance, doesn't mean women don't like men. The reason women move on faster is that they tend to have way more options, it's as simple as that. Also, Esther Villar is a woman, a feminist, a lefty and anti-marriage. It's weird how she's used by tradcons and right-wingers. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/07/17 12:01 PM |
| 3 | Accused Student in Columbia "Mattress Girl" Case Receives Settlement: People on Facebook are Not Pleased in the LeastSome people in a facebook, feminist page saying stupid things somehow proves something. I guess if I go to /r/incels were people celebrate Elliot Rodgers, it's going to prove something about men as a whole? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/07/17 07:15 AM |
| 2 | CMV: The vast majority of crap that men put up with is the fault of more powerful men.Asking hard questions about capitalism is more difficult than just blaming women. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/07/17 06:51 AM |
| 1 | What civilizations were destroyed by females?You said it yourself that it was a white male environment. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/07/17 06:47 AM |
| 1 | What civilizations were destroyed by females?Kinda alarmist, don't you think? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/07/17 06:45 AM |
| 1 | CMV: Feminism represents womenMy brother's keeper still exists, all they did was complain a bit that it doesn't include women. Source about NOW and what exactly they say? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/07/17 06:45 AM |
| 1 | CMV: Feminism represents womenIf they start and got big enough for feminist to notice they will fight against him on it. How come? Do you have any proof of this? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 09:56 PM |
| 1 | What civilizations were destroyed by females?The idea that men are individualists makes no sense. If anything men are supposed to protect the tribe even by sacrificing their lives sometimes, therefore they're collectivists. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 09:44 PM |
| 1 | What civilizations were destroyed by females?? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 09:41 PM |
| 2 | CMV: Feminism represents womenFeminism is mainly about female liberation, however nothing is really stopping men from using their money to fund centres for male victims. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 09:41 PM |
| 1 | What civilizations were destroyed by females?You worked in a white male environment and you sound pissed that women work there now and you can't say racist and sexist things anymore, that's why I said it sounds a bit entitled. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 09:40 PM |
| 1 | What civilizations were destroyed by females?Outearning at a young age doesn't imply they own capital. What jobs are they doing? Don't women dominate the public sector by being teachers, nurses etc. ? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 09:32 PM |
| 1 | What civilizations were destroyed by females?No, the problem is capitalism and how the capitalist corporations can exploit and fire people people when they think they're harming the interests of the company. It's how capitalism works. Blaming the SJWs is silly, if it's not the SJWs, it could be someone else. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 09:26 PM |
| 1 | What civilizations were destroyed by females?That sounds a bit entitled. Women have the right to work too and I am sure women talk differently in female-only environments too. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 09:20 PM |
| 1 | What civilizations were destroyed by females?You said that people lose their jobs over jokes. And you think some SJWs are to blame for this, instead of how the entire system works, really? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 09:18 PM |
| 3 | CMV: Feminism represents womenWhen a feminist documentarian makes a film about men's issues, including health problems, it's feminists that come out to oppose it. That's because it was about the MRAs and the MRAs are anti-feminists. Of course the feminists would oppose an anti-feminist group. They don't seem to care that much about an actual, legal imposition on men as a sex. Well, in my country most feminist groups are against mandatory military service. Sure it's not enough, but at least they oppose it. It's a mixture of l… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 09:17 PM |
| 1 | What civilizations were destroyed by females?People lose their jobs in capitalism and it's somehow the fault of fascism or "cultural marxism"? Yea, right. If you don't like the idea that your boss can fire you whenever, perhaps you should start blaming the right people. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 09:07 PM |
| 1 | People in happy marriages or live in LTR's of a few years: How do you know you won't stop wanting your partner?I don't know that, but I don't plan to marry my partner anyway. I prefer to be unmarried and in a LTR. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 09:03 PM |
| 1 | What civilizations were destroyed by females?It's called social liberalism. It's a thing. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 09:02 PM |
| 3 | CMV: Feminism represents womenthe ones that gave women reproductive rights but not men Men are going to have reproductive rights soon when the male birth control pill is perfected. Nobody is against this. the ones that fund health initiatives for women specifically while we're living in a world in which men are doing so poorly in terms of health that it is shifting demographics, and so on I hope you realize that nobody is stopping from starting a campaign about male health issues. The one that gave women the right to vote wi… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 09:02 PM |
| 2 | CMV: Feminism represents womenWomen like all people want to protect their own interests. Anyway, what specific feminist laws are bothering you? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 08:43 PM |
| 1 | What civilizations were destroyed by females?TIL German communists don't exist... | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 08:37 PM |
| 1 | What civilizations were destroyed by females?They are social liberals, some of them at least. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 08:36 PM |
| 1 | What civilizations were destroyed by females?Or you just don't know what you're talking about. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 08:34 PM |
| 1 | What civilizations were destroyed by females?It's the "rape capital" because they have changed the laws about rape. You can google it for details. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 08:34 PM |
| 1 | What civilizations were destroyed by females?I just view the system as inherently exploitative towards a class of people. I also think capitalism won't be sustainable in the long term. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 08:32 PM |
| 1 | What civilizations were destroyed by females?I don't think that's what TRPillers are trying to say, but okay. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 08:31 PM |
| 1 | What civilizations were destroyed by females?Nah, married women by extension have capital as well. But married women are more likely to vote right-wing, aren't they? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 08:30 PM |
| 7 | What civilizations were destroyed by females?I used to study history and archaeology at university before I switched. Most of the comments here seem absurd. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 05:26 PM |
| 2 | What civilizations were destroyed by females?There is no communist conspiracy dude. Although, I wish there was. Liberals and progressives have nothing to do with communism. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 05:23 PM |
| 1 | What civilizations were destroyed by females?why women are so easily conned into voting for what is ultimately against their own interest. It's an economic thing. Women are less likely to own capital , therefore they vote for the left. I don't buy it's because women are "less racist" than men. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 05:03 PM |
| 4 | What civilizations were destroyed by females?Sure... Ancient Athens When? Citation needed, I have never heard of it. Can you give sources for what you're saying? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 05:00 PM |
| 3 | What civilizations were destroyed by females?It hasn't been "destroyed" yet. A bit alarmist, don't you think? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 04:46 PM |
| 5 | What civilizations were destroyed by females?The notion that laissez-faire economics are inherently superior is flawed and many economists don't even support this kind of system. That being said communists don't support welfare and social programs, they want to tear down society and rebuild it. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 04:40 PM |
| 3 | What civilizations were destroyed by females?Meh, social programs were just an attempt to suppress communism tbh. They started not leaving the poor to die so that they wouldn't revolt. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 04:33 PM |
| 3 | What civilizations were destroyed by females?How has Sweden been destroyed? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 04:28 PM |
| 2 | What civilizations were destroyed by females?Most progressives are not secret communists though so the cultural marxism thing is ridiculous. However, I do admit that communists want to destroy the current civilization. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 04:28 PM |
| 5 | What civilizations were destroyed by females?That wasn't socialism, we had a corrupt social democracy and most of our politicians were men. Also, Greece has faced economic problems multiple times in the past, before women could even vote. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 04:18 PM |
| 1 | On Hatred for TRPNot from the communist point of view, they aren't. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 04:16 PM |
| 1 | What civilizations were destroyed by females?I was just making a joke about the theory that "cultural marxists are secret communists who want to destroy the west" thing. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 03:56 PM |
| 1 | What civilizations were destroyed by females?It seems like the plan of us commies is working out then... | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 03:48 PM |
| 1 | On Hatred for TRPSocial democracy is different than socialism. Social democracy is basically welfare capitalism, which is what people like Bernie Sanders support. Socialism means that the means of production are owned by the workers. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 03:48 PM |
| 3 | What civilizations were destroyed by females?Workers of the world do need to crush society tbh. However, you still didn't bring any specific examples where women destroyed civilizations in the past. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 02:54 PM |
| 3 | What civilizations were destroyed by females?So any specific examples of that happening? Is Rome the only example? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 02:53 PM |
| 1 | On Hatred for TRPSeriously though the perception that communists support welfare and support the UBI is incorrect. Most communists don't even vote at all and at best you will find people who say welfare is just a necessary evil. If you talk to actual communists, you will see that yourself, I just wanted to correct that perception. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 02:41 PM |
| 5 | What civilizations were destroyed by females?I didn't say that. TRPillers are the ones who blame women for the collapse of civilizations. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 02:36 PM |
| 4 | What civilizations were destroyed by females?How many societies were left with women even having any political input at the start of feminism and post modernity? Not women ruling but women having any say? All of the societies that tried it (and surely there were many, humanity is quite diverse and has been around for many generations) were wiped out by a patriarchy that gave women the correct amount of political power for an ideal society (none) So any specific examples? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 02:33 PM |
| 1 | On Hatred for TRPPeople who work and don't own the means of production are the proletariat. People who are unemployed are lumpenproletariat. People who own the means of production are the capitalists. Communists don't want welfare, they want the workers to rise up and displace the capitalists. I am part of the proletariat myself, I don't vote for any party and I think welfare is a way to enslave the workers. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 02:32 PM |
| 6 | What civilizations were destroyed by females?The Greeks before then believed the Persians to be effeminate in the same way, and that this was their downfall. First time I ever heard of this. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 02:00 PM |
| 6 | What civilizations were destroyed by females?I don't know, I don't live there. I don't think Sweden has collapsed yet though. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 01:59 PM |
| 1 | What civilizations were destroyed by females?I haven't heard of him. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 01:52 PM |
| 3 | What civilizations were destroyed by females?Aren't most RPillers conservatives and neoliberals? I thought these people liked the Tories. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 01:45 PM |
| 1 | On Hatred for TRPWelfare (and UBI) is an attempt to keep the proletariat satisfied so that they won't revolt. Communists know this very well, that's why some of them are against welfare while others say it's a necessary evil. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 01:44 PM |
| 3 | What civilizations were destroyed by females?TRPillers often say females destroy civilizations. I just made this thread to see concrete examples of this. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 01:43 PM |
| 2 | What civilizations were destroyed by females?TRPillers and MGTOW often say that females destroy civilizations. I was just interested to see what they mean specifically. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 01:32 PM |
| 3 | What civilizations were destroyed by females?Are there any historians that specifically cite female emancipation as the reason why civilizations fall? I have only seen a historian citing it as one out of hundreds of reasons for Rome specifically. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 01:32 PM |
| 3 | What civilizations were destroyed by females?I don't understand your point. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 01:20 PM |
| 5 | What civilizations were destroyed by females?Which civilizations then? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 01:04 PM |
| 5 | What civilizations were destroyed by females?Never seen those threads on the internet where men are worthless monsters because they cheat while women are excusable for cheating because their man is a worthless subhuman You're making it seem more widespread than it really is. In most social circles female cheating is viewed as deplorable too. Leftists and SJWs are actually the ones that will be pushing for men to not be expected to pay on dates usually. It's more of a traditionalist attitude to expect men to pay for everything. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 01:03 PM |
| 6 | What civilizations were destroyed by females?PUA is viewed negatively because of misunderstandings around LMR and negging. The rest is silly. It reminds me of certain women that say "men expect us to shave and wear make up and give blowjobs". Nobody is forcing you to do it. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 12:48 PM |
| 6 | What civilizations were destroyed by females?Well, I don't know. When the Byzantine Empire fell we had a male emperor after all. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 12:31 PM |
| 5 | What civilizations were destroyed by females?doing man stuff as a man is morally wrong. Like what? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 12:29 PM |
| 2 | Is WGTOW serious or are they just satirizing MGTOW?They seem serious to me. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 12:23 PM |
| 16 | What civilizations were destroyed by females?One female leader = females destroy civilizations. All the other male leaders destroying their countries=men never destroyed civilizations. It was all caused by females. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 12:19 PM |
| 10 | What civilizations were destroyed by females?Moral decay and corruption=females' fault? What people don't realize is you need the family unit as a foundation to society. It depends on how the economy works, but I won't get into this here. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 12:04 PM |
| 2 | Is WGTOW serious or are they just satirizing MGTOW?https://np.reddit.com/r/MGTOWWOM/ | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 12:01 PM |
| 3 | Is WGTOW serious or are they just satirizing MGTOW?Naked Ape has said he turned gay to avoid women. So it's not unheard of. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 11:52 AM |
| 7 | What civilizations were destroyed by females?Ok, citation needed that Rome was destroyed by women. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 11:50 AM |
| 3 | Is WGTOW serious or are they just satirizing MGTOW?Are MGTOW any different? Don't people like Naked Ape say they turned gay to avoid women? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 11:46 AM |
| 3 | What civilizations were destroyed by females?I mean if they insist so much that women destroy civilizations, they must have at least one example, right? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 11:17 AM |
| 8 | What civilizations were destroyed by females?Funny joke, how much do you know about the history of Greece? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 10:48 AM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongDid I say that? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 09:30 AM |
| 1 | Q4women: How often do you get hit on/asked out? What does your dating pool look like?I never get hit on or asked out these days, except if you count weird stuff like strangers cat-calling. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 05:59 AM |
| 3 | Is WGTOW serious or are they just satirizing MGTOW?WGTOW has existed for decades. There have been radical feminists that were "political lesbians" or "political spinsters" or "lesbian separatists" , I don't know why people think it's so weird. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/07/17 05:55 AM |
| 3 | Does cat-calling ever work?I didn't say that. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/07/17 05:42 PM |
| 0 | Does cat-calling ever work?It depends on the context doesn't it? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/07/17 04:55 PM |
| 4 | Does cat-calling ever work?Well, cat-calling and talking to people in the streets are certainly different things. I believe even the feminists would agree. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/07/17 04:48 PM |
| 2 | Does cat-calling ever work?Making inappropriate comments at women you don't know while on the streets. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/07/17 04:44 PM |
| 3 | Reebok slams Trump, claims its never appropriate to call a woman "beautiful"Yea perhaps they do hate Trump, but I can still see why some would view it as inappropriate for a world-leader to comment on the appearance of the wife of another world-leader. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/07/17 03:48 PM |
| 4 | Reebok slams Trump, claims its never appropriate to call a woman "beautiful"Well perhaps. I guess coming from someone like Trump who has a history of saying inappropriate things, people would inevitably question his intentions. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/07/17 07:24 AM |
| 1 | Feminists and BP's are ignorant to what most women want which is a partner with a steady incomeThat goes back to what I have been saying all along that marriage exists because of economic inequality. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/07/17 07:17 AM |
| 7 | Reebok slams Trump, claims its never appropriate to call a woman "beautiful"He's the president, don't you think it's inappropriate of him to make comments about women's bodies at this point? He's not some ordinary man, he's the president and he's married too. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/07/17 07:16 AM |
| 1 | Discussion: Do people have an obligation to become monogamous and breed in order to benefit society? Should they?No, we should strive for something better. The need for strict monogamy and marriage exists to protect the current economic system, but the question is, why should we want to save it? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/07/17 07:15 AM |
| 2 | Q4W: What percentages of your friends "ride the cock carousel"? Do/Did you?I don't know many details about the sexual history of my friends to be honest, but then again I never really had "close" friends, just people I occasionally hung out with. As about me, well I suppose it depends on how you define the cock carousel. I never liked casual sex, I tried it once and decided it wasn't for me. I have slept with 5 men including my current partner. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/07/17 07:10 AM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongThey say all women are irrational, irresponsible and solipsistic. AWALT. Yes, they're analyzing all women. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 08:30 PM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongThe idea is to empower certain groups so that they will seek their own freedom. The government doesn't have to be involved. I am a Marxist so I believe the lower classes will eventually revolt and seize the means of production. I think once economic inequality ceases to exist, other forms of oppression will cease to exist too. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 08:29 PM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongI think freedom can exist only when equal opportunity exists. Otherwise you're still oppressed by certain systemic structures. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 08:19 PM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongI disagree with your concept of freedom, but I don't think we can convince each other to change our opinions. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 08:12 PM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongUnfair discrimination is a bad thing. It goes against the concept of equal opportunity. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 08:03 PM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongDid you actually read the link? Are you aware that things like education affect your IQ? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 08:02 PM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongYou're wrong, but I don't care to change your mind on this. How am I wrong? Even TRPillers themselves don't pretend to be unbiased. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 07:54 PM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongYou didn't address my point that these stereotypes can lead to discrimination in aspects of life, like in the workplace. Also, TRP is not scientific. Using personal anecdotes cannot pass as science. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 07:52 PM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongLol they criticize IQ tests because different ethnic groups and races score lower than others. That's not even what the links say lol. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 07:49 PM |
| 1 | Q4ALL: Is everything as gloomy for men in the dating market as some people say it is?You said me stereotyping RPillers is somehow the equivalence of TRPillers steeotyping all women. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 05:26 PM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongWhat do you not understand in this thread? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 04:22 PM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongNot an argument. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 04:02 PM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongIQ tests have been criticized again and again as deeply flawed, very few people take them seriously anymore. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/9755929/IQ-tests-do-not-reflect-intelligence.html http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/iq-tests-are-fundamentally-flawed-and-using-them-alone-to-measure-intelligence-is-a-fallacy-study-8425911.html | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 03:01 PM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongMuh IQ. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 02:54 PM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongI don't know. I have seen a lot of RPillers promoting that narrative. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 02:46 PM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongBecause it's unfair and an illegitimate form of discrimination? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 02:38 PM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongI was talking about RPillers, not men in general. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 02:09 PM |
| 1 | Q4ALL: Is everything as gloomy for men in the dating market as some people say it is?Well, it doesn't have to be true for everyone. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 02:02 PM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongThey are expecting women to do domestic work, which is associated with traditional gender roles. They expect women to follow specific beauty standards. They expect women to have traditionally feminine behaviors. This is their right to do that but you get my point. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 01:52 PM |
| 2 | Children in single-mother-by-choice families do just as well as those in two-parent families.I am a proud classist. Rich people are privileged compared to poor people. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 01:50 PM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongTRPillers are expecting women to act in a traditional way quite frequently. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 01:48 PM |
| 11 | There is no WGTOW because women need men more than men need womenIt is easy to be less spiteful when the entire society is structured to meet the needs of your gende Well, that's not how they see it that's for sure. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 01:38 PM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongThe same could be said about men who say that women should do X, Y then? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 01:38 PM |
| 2 | There is no WGTOW because women need men more than men need womenPrinceso, I wanted to ask you something about radical feminism. Can I pm you? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 01:32 PM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongWomen can be biased too sure. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 01:23 PM |
| 1 | Q4ALL: Is everything as gloomy for men in the dating market as some people say it is?You're missing the point. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 01:17 PM |
| 1 | Q4ALL: Is everything as gloomy for men in the dating market as some people say it is?The situation of being affected by said stereotypes. Don't pretend to be stupid, you know what I'm talking about. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 01:10 PM |
| 1 | Q4ALL: Is everything as gloomy for men in the dating market as some people say it is?Yea, and you equated them, like they're the same thing. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 01:07 PM |
| 1 | Q4ALL: Is everything as gloomy for men in the dating market as some people say it is?You equated two different situations: Women being discriminated against because of their genitals and you losing friends because of your association with TRP sub. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 12:57 PM |
| 1 | Q4ALL: Is everything as gloomy for men in the dating market as some people say it is?https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/6nf3rv/q4all_is_everything_as_gloomy_for_men_in_the/dk90lra/ | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 12:54 PM |
| 1 | Q4ALL: Is everything as gloomy for men in the dating market as some people say it is?You equated them in the first place. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 12:53 PM |
| 1 | Q4ALL: Is everything as gloomy for men in the dating market as some people say it is?How is it a strawman? You're the on who started comparing two completely different things. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 12:47 PM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wronghttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_resources You mean this? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 12:43 PM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongLike what? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 12:41 PM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongI am not from the US. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 12:40 PM |
| 1 | Q4ALL: Is everything as gloomy for men in the dating market as some people say it is?Alright, maybe I am hypocritical. However, you can't deny that choosing who to associate with, is different than being born with certain genitals. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 12:40 PM |
| 22 | There is no WGTOW because women need men more than men need womenTo be honest I almost never see radfems being as spiteful as MGTOW. I mean look at radfem subs like /r/gendercritical . There is some "whining" and some man hating but /r/MGTOW is on a whole new level. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 12:39 PM |
| 18 | There is no WGTOW because women need men more than men need womenThere are radical feminists that are WGTOW and it has existed for decades. Have you never heard of the terms "political lesbianism" or "political spinsterhood"? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 12:36 PM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongMost women are not even that into politics. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 12:34 PM |
| 1 | Q4ALL: Is everything as gloomy for men in the dating market as some people say it is?No it's not. For example I agree with the fascists that there is a problem with mass immigration but I don't call myself a fascist and I don't associate with them. You see the point? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 12:34 PM |
| 1 | Q4ALL: Is everything as gloomy for men in the dating market as some people say it is?No, but you can choose who you associate with. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 12:32 PM |
| 1 | Q4ALL: Is everything as gloomy for men in the dating market as some people say it is?You can choose whether you want to associate yourself with them or not. I believe they are right on some points, but I don't associate myself with them because I don't like how they continually promote right-with rhetoric. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 12:28 PM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongWhat are HR departments? Also, women can be biased too btw. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 12:24 PM |
| 1 | Q4ALL: Is everything as gloomy for men in the dating market as some people say it is?You want me to prove that people only push beliefs that they believe? The other day GLO openly admitted that he is a troll. Just saying. Some people do say things they don't believe. And if you could hide your gender, I'd be in the right because nobody forced you to reveal your gender? It's just a false equivalence and I think you know it. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 12:21 PM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongSame as above. Also, most women prefer things like Art rather than Science. Preference doesn't necessarily imply lack of capability. You know, it's really easy to tell you're a woman. Oh boy, here we go. Do you think there are no men that agree with me? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 12:17 PM |
| 1 | Q4ALL: Is everything as gloomy for men in the dating market as some people say it is?Those who do promote it do believe it. Proof? Correctness and honesty aside, you hate us for stereotyping I think it's a false equivalence. Nobody forced you to be a Red Piller, while people have no choice with what genitals they're born. Also, nobody forced you to discuss TRP in real life, while people can't normally hide their gender. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 12:05 PM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongYou didn't show any substantial evidence to prove your claims that women are more solipsistic or significantly less rational than men. You're using personal anecdotes. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 12:05 PM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongThe solution is to see women as people that are flawed like everyone else. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 11:59 AM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongDoes this mean this behavior should be encouraged? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 11:55 AM |
| 8 | CMV: Women have the power in both sex and relationships.The idea that men are the gatekeepers of commitment is only true for a few men imo. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 11:55 AM |
| 1 | Q4ALL: Is everything as gloomy for men in the dating market as some people say it is?I think a lot of them don't believe everything TRP promotes is necessarily true. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 11:52 AM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongWhat's rational about promoting sexism based on pseudoscience and personal opinions? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 11:51 AM |
| 1 | Q4ALL: Is everything as gloomy for men in the dating market as some people say it is?They're dishonestly promoting pseudoscience. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 11:49 AM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongClearly this means that sexism is not the primary reason for more men being in certain jobs. I didn't say that it's the "primary reason". Therefore you're strawmaning. You put forward an OP stating that XYZ happens because of stereotypes and sexism. I said that sometimes it happens because of sexism and even you can't deny it's true. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 11:48 AM |
| 1 | Do you agree male circumcision is worse than female circumcision?Yea, I know. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 11:45 AM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongSolipsism is a phenomena present in WAY more women than men. Citation needed? Perhaps not "all", but you have to admit it's extremely hard to have a mature discussion with 99% of women without them getting emotional and bailing out of the argument. Citation needed. Have you spoken with 99% of women? Things like fat acceptance or body positivity. "It's not your fault you're obese, you're beautiful already!" or biased rape laws. "It's not your fault you had drunken sex! If you think you were raped… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 11:45 AM |
| 5 | Do you agree male circumcision is worse than female circumcision?I don't follow your logic. You know MGM doesn't prevent men from having sex, yet you use it to argue that it's worse because sex is more important for men?? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 11:42 AM |
| 1 | Q4ALL: Is everything as gloomy for men in the dating market as some people say it is?It's not about being incorrect, it's that they're often based on no evidence. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 11:40 AM |
| 1 | Do you agree male circumcision is worse than female circumcision?Male circumcision doesn't really prevent men from having sex though. I know it can cause some problems, but it doesn't prevent them from having sex. Therefore I don't understand what you're trying to argue. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 11:39 AM |
| -1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongPerhaps you need to stay on topic because what you're saying has nothing to do with the point of the thread. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 11:36 AM |
| 1 | Q4ALL: Is everything as gloomy for men in the dating market as some people say it is?The point with TRP is that they don't only promote stereotypes. They promote stereotypes dressed with pseudoscience, presenting them as the ultimate truth. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 11:34 AM |
| 3 | Do you agree male circumcision is worse than female circumcision?Male circumcision in Africa has a much greater rate of medical complications. Source? sex is far more important to men than it is to women. I am not sure I agree. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 11:31 AM |
| -1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongOne study doesn't prove that discrimination based on gender doesn't exist, especially since there are people that openly admit they do it. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 11:30 AM |
| 2 | Q4ALL: Is everything as gloomy for men in the dating market as some people say it is?TRPillers are not necessarily representative of all men though. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 11:25 AM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongThen what about the first study I posted in the OP? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 11:24 AM |
| 1 | Do you agree male circumcision is worse than female circumcision?While I am against male circumcision for no good reason, they can't even be compared. FGM usually results in worse medical complications and they are different in nature in general. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 11:23 AM |
| 1 | Do you agree male circumcision is worse than female circumcision?Are we talking about FGM? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 11:17 AM |
| 1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?What does feminism have to do with the topic? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 11:16 AM |
| 2 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongDo you think discrimination on the basis of gender never happens because one study said so. I just showed you someone who openly admits that he discriminates based on gender. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 11:15 AM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongAnd? Shouldn't people be discouraged from killing anyway? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 10:50 AM |
| 1 | Q4ALL: Is everything as gloomy for men in the dating market as some people say it is?I didn't say TRPillers are misogynists, I said they encourage misogyny. Wait, did you just admit that stereotypes can harm innocent people? Which was basically the point of my other thread? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 10:50 AM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongI don't understand your argument. Do you think a society can function properly without any sort of moral code? If we promoted the idea that killing is not wrong, would that be productive? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 10:46 AM |
| 4 | Q4ALL: Is everything as gloomy for men in the dating market as some people say it is?You've lost friends because of your views, not because of the stereotype that men get into TRP because they have trouble in their dating lives. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 10:45 AM |
| 0 | Q4ALL: Is everything as gloomy for men in the dating market as some people say it is?I am against stereotypes that actually affect people negatively in real life. I don't see how this stereotype affects TRPillers in any way. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 10:38 AM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongMorals are not useless. They can help us organize society in the most efficient way possible. There are logical reasons to be against sexism. For example, if people discriminate against women in the workplace they could be missing out. Even if there is only one woman that can produce something beneficial, why should she not be given the chance? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 10:36 AM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongPerhaps, but this is not a thread about feminism. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 10:28 AM |
| 2 | Q4ALL: Is everything as gloomy for men in the dating market as some people say it is?Yea, it's a possibility, but I do think in most cases people get into TRP to improve their dating life. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 10:28 AM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongIn my mind the truth is rooted in objectivity, not bias. However, you're free to have a different opinion. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 10:15 AM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongSo you basically don't deny what I said in the other thread that TRP has anti-female bias? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 10:11 AM |
| 1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?Would you say the same if you were someone targeted by stereotypes? For example if you were a black man living in a community that encourages the idea that blacks are violent and stupid? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 10:08 AM |
| 1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?No, I don't think they should be banned. Although I do wonder if they realize the consequences of their rhetoric. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 10:07 AM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongHow would it be honest if it's not objective and unbiased? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 10:07 AM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongI think a majority believe that most of TRP is the honest truth. We could ask and find out. Alright, could you make a thread "Do you think TRP promotes an honest, unbiased and scientific truth about male and female nature"? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 09:59 AM |
| 5 | Q4ALL: Is everything as gloomy for men in the dating market as some people say it is?People who post on TRP are the ones more likely to have trouble dating. Why else would they get into TRP in the first place? Like my ex used to say, people who get into PUA, get into PUA because they have problems in the first place. Therefore no, it's not necessarily true for most people. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 09:55 AM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongHow many RPillers do you think there are that believe everything on TRP is the honest truth? I think most would agree that TRP is not scientific, yet they promote than image anyway. Do you honestly think there is no anti-women bias in TRP? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 09:54 AM |
| 3 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongTIL being moral is for women. Any morality-based arguments don't count because we're all psychopaths who don't care about society and other people can just die. Pack it up folks. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 09:30 AM |
| 2 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongIt's not angst stuff. The entire of TRP is based on pseudoscience that's on the sidebar. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 09:27 AM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wronghttps://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/6h8hwu/in_many_cases_when_there_are_discussions_about/diwct2p/ he's a Red Piller, you can check his post history. https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/6h8hwu/in_many_cases_when_there_are_discussions_about/diwb7uu/ alreadyredschool is a Red Pill veteran. https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/6h8hwu/in_many_cases_when_there_are_discussions_about/diwks3u/ "I don't think TRP is objective". | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 09:27 AM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongWhy don't you read the thread I linked then? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 09:21 AM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongSome threads don't discount the other threads that show anti-female bias. How is TRP supposed to be objective and scientific when for example they say women are more irresponsible and more immature than men without real evidence? Also, I am not sure what these anecdote based threads are supposed to prove. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 09:18 AM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongI am not sure how I am supposed to prove that when TRPillers themselves say so. You would have to ask them yourself about how scientific and objective they truly are. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 09:16 AM |
| 2 | Promoting sexism is morally wronghttps://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/6h8hwu/in_many_cases_when_there_are_discussions_about/ You can read the answers of this thread. TRPillers generally fail to disprove my point about anti-women bias and many of them openly agree that there is anti-women bias. i don't know what you mean by saying this claim should be tested. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 09:04 AM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongAffirmative action exists because discrimination based on gender and race exists. I don't support it, but it was an answer to an existing phenomenon. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 08:58 AM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongI am not an American. Do you think someone making a subreddit promoting killing children would not be morally wrong? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 08:57 AM |
| 2 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongI can give you the link to my thread about anti-female bias. TRPillers admit it's a thing. Elites like GLO have also openly admitted to be trolls and dishonest on multiple cases. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 08:54 AM |
| 2 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongAnd I said that I don't support it, what's your point? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 08:53 AM |
| 2 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongTRPillers generally openly say that they're biased and dishonest though. I had made a thread in the past about how there is anti-female bias in TRP discussions and TRPillers agreed. Therefore, they don't promote an honest understanding of male and female nature. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 08:46 AM |
| 2 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongI also think censorship of something like TRP would only sweep the stereotype-related issues (for both men and women, really) it addresses under the proverbial rug. It would just fester and manifest in other ways until it's addressed. I don't see TRP as a bad way to bring some of the issues to light. If TRP was discussing male and female differences in a honest and scientific way I would agree. This is not what they're doing. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 08:39 AM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongIf I have extensive bad experience with one group of people. Women/men/blacks/white/Christian/Muslim/Jews - then I'm going to act on the basis of this experience. In dating, in hiring, etc. Could this be any other way? The point is why should this discriminatory behavior be encouraged? In any case, I'm not sure promoting anything can be morally wrong. It's up to people to decide whether they want to buy the message or not. "I promote the idea that Jews should all be killed. Nothing morally wrong… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 08:37 AM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongI don't support affirmative action, but shouldn't people who oppose affirmative action also oppose discrimination based on gender and race? Or who cares about black people and women, they can all starve? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 08:35 AM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongIf TRPillers promoted an honest and unbiased understanding of female and male nature, I would agree. However, they don't do that. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 08:21 AM |
| 2 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongAlright lets make an analogy. Lets say some people promote the idea that Slavs are inferior and their sources are some Nazi pseudoscience. You confront them and say they're dishonest and immoral and they say "well, this model works for me whatever". Then some of these people start actively discriminating against Slavs. Should the people promoting the misinformation and pseudoscience not be questioned? Or who gives a shit about Slavs anyway? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 08:17 AM |
| 2 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongBut it's not accurate. They promote pseudoscience and even they have admitted to being dishonest in many cases. It's not about getting offended. It's about whether it leads to real life consequences. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 08:11 AM |
| 2 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongSo in your opinion promoting pseudoscience as the absolute truth, doesn't lead to discrimination or you want to argue that there's nothing wrong with that? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 08:08 AM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongI just disagree. I think TRP can promote discrimination on everyday life. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 08:07 AM |
| 2 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongDid you read the whole post? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 08:06 AM |
| 2 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongAt least you're honest. I'm tired of RPillers saying TRP is just a sexual strategy. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 08:06 AM |
| 3 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongunderstanding of the difference between one thing and another. TRPillers don't promote an honest understanding of the differences between men and women. They're openly biased and promote a lot of pseudoscience. It's not enough to say that it causes hardship, as one person's hardship is often another's benefit. Causing undeserved hardship to people because they were born with specific genitals is not morally questionable in your opinion? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 08:05 AM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongSeems like a silly analogy as you're comparing completely different things. Also, I think Mao did more good than harm on average. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 08:01 AM |
| 0 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongIsn't promoting misinformation and dubious science morally questionable? The fact that some RPillers don't take it that way, doesn't mean TRP isn't promoting sexism while indirectly encouraging discrimination. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 07:29 AM |
| 2 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongThis a CMV thread, I expressed my opinion for them to challenge it. Other than that they can do what they like and they will be judged accordingly. When the popular sense of "morals" is biased, can you blame one side for not adopting it? So because society is biased against men in some ways, the solution is encouraging misogyny and discrimination against women? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 07:28 AM |
| 5 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongSo should stereotyping be encouraged despite the real life consequences? Should women not be hired on a gender basis in your opinion? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 07:22 AM |
| 2 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongTRPillers say that information is amoral. It doesn't mean others can't morally judge them for what they represent. The idea that they're somehow beyond judgement is absurd. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 07:19 AM |
| 3 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongYou missed the point that other studies have found that when there are identical resumes, they're more likely to hire the men. heck, we even had a RPiller openly admitting that he does it. You cannot deny it might be happening in certain cases. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 07:14 AM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongExcept that I didn't say that, did I? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 07:04 AM |
| 2 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongNo, I meant that this is something that is already happening. The point it, why should this discrimination be encouraged? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 07:03 AM |
| 2 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongThe point of this thread is whether this type of discrimination should be encouraged and perpetuated. They can already not hire women as long as they don't say the real reason. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 07:01 AM |
| 0 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongThat's a stupid thing to say. Are these men so hypersensitive that they can't get over the women are wonderful effect without actively discriminating against women in the workplace? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 06:39 AM |
| 3 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongNo why? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 06:28 AM |
| 1 | Promoting sexism is morally wrongI don't have to be a Christian to care about where this world is going. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 06:23 AM |
| 7 | Children in single-mother-by-choice families do just as well as those in two-parent families.I think the reason children in single-parent-household families tend to have some problems, is because they tend to be poor. So those results don't surprise me, if they're single by choice they would also have their financial problems figured out. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 05:27 AM |
| 3 | Why isn’t WGTOW as big as MGTOW?Radical feminism has been a thing for decades and many of them are basically WGTOW without calling it that. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 05:25 AM |
| 1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?So with all that said, UBI will happen when humans don't have to do ANYTHING to get ANYTHING. And what about those who are losing their jobs every day? Fuck them right? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 05:24 AM |
| 1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?I didn't say they should be politically correct. I said whether they think promoting stereotypes is acceptable even if they could lead to real life consequences. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 05:22 AM |
| 1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?It's fine with me. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 05:21 AM |
| 1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?No, I didn't say anything about banning. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 05:20 AM |
| 1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?Nobody has to die, as long as they peacefully give up their private property. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/17 05:20 AM |
| 1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?Who knows. The point is that blaming globalism on marxists is silly. It's not the Marxists that are in power. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 09:10 PM |
| 1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?Marxists don't say the rich are evil, Jesus did. Marxists say that the workers are exploited and will eventually rise against their exploitation. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 09:04 PM |
| 1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?Globalism is a capitalist concept. Communists are internationalists, not globalists. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 09:00 PM |
| 1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?It's the reactionaries that are treating communism as anti-western despite it being invented by westerners. I am just responding accordingly. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 08:55 PM |
| 1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?https://www.google.gr/search?q=che+guevara&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&sqi=2&ved=0ahUKEwid07uC1InVAhVCLcAKHe79CuUQ_AUIBigB&biw=1920&bih=984#imgrc=3urJ6KzMxdF_HM: You wish you were as alpha as this man. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 08:54 PM |
| 1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?This is not about getting offended. It's about whether women should be stereotyped and discriminated against. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 08:43 PM |
| 2 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?You answered sufficiently that you think discrimination based on gender is valid, so that statement was not about you. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 08:42 PM |
| 1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?In the future, a lot of people are going ot lose their jobs because of automation. They're going to get UBI. UBI is just another attempt to save capitalism from itself, just like welfare. Ask yourself, will you be satisfied living off UBI? Should the means of production be owned only by certain individuals who often did nothing to deserve them? Do factories need capitalists in order to run? What is going to happen when transhumanism becomes a thing, will you be satisfied with the the wealthy eli… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 08:03 PM |
| 1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?Capitalism is on average better than feudalism. That doesn't mean we shouldn't strive for something better. Also, when talking about African countries specifically, they're probably worse off now tbh. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 07:45 PM |
| 1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?Most third world countries are capitalist and they have people starving. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 07:41 PM |
| 2 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?My point was that stereotyping leads to discrimination and you just proved my point. Discrimination doesn't have to be "legal". | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 07:40 PM |
| 1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?Why isn't it rational? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 07:36 PM |
| 1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?No I asked a specific question. You failed to answer. I don't care about what the feminist are doing, discuss it in another thread. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 07:33 PM |
| 1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?I am asking you then. Is the only way to sexual success to promote the idea than women are subhuman? Besides this is not a thread discussing the sexual success aspect. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 07:32 PM |
| 1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?This thread is not about feminists. You can make a different thread about feminists. You're off topic. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 07:31 PM |
| 1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?Venezuela is not socialist though. Also, you're missing the context on why they're facing the crisis. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 07:30 PM |
| 2 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?TRPillers believe women are mentally inferior , how is that not the rational choice? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 07:29 PM |
| 0 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?This isn't the point of the thread, you're off topic. You can make another thread about feminism. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 07:28 PM |
| 1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?No, I don't blame TRP specifically. I am asking whether they think stereotypes should be promoted in that way. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 07:28 PM |
| 1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?Alright so TRP is saying that all women are irrational, more irresponsible than men etc. etc. Are we supposed to believe that doesn't affect certain people's mindset despite all evidence to the contrary? Most RP elites literally believe women shouldn't vote because of their gender. I don't know what point you're trying to make but it does't seem like you're succeeding. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 07:27 PM |
| 1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?My point was that capitalism creates economic crisis all the time. It even happens in countries like the US, let alone third world countries. Despite all that people don't give up on capitalism. So why should we give up on communism? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 07:24 PM |
| 1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?I asked a specific question. It doesn't seem like you're willing to answer. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 07:22 PM |
| 2 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?This is not a thread about feminists. You're off topic. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 07:22 PM |
| 1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?when did a capitalist country collapse because of capitalism. name one. All the poor capitalist countries like several African and Asian countries? What about all of the the times when capitalism has crashed? There are economic crisis in capitalism once every few years. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 07:18 PM |
| 1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?Because other way they wouldn't be promoting these stereotypes in that way. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 07:17 PM |
| 1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?TRP is sexual strategy, period Yea, I don't buy it. If they believe that women are inherently irrational and more irresponsible than men then it's deeper than just sexual strategy. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 07:16 PM |
| 1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?That is another issue. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 07:14 PM |
| 1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?Yes, what do you think of this question? My perception is that TRPillers would agree that stereotypes should be promoted because that's what they're doing. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 07:13 PM |
| 1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?Am I wrong? This is what TRPillers are doing. You're free to prove to me that I'm wrong but I don't think you can do that. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 07:12 PM |
| 1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?Capitalism fails all the time but people don't give up on it. Why should we give up on communism? Also, why do you think it's against human nature? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 07:11 PM |
| 1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?I asked a specific question to RPillers. I didn't say they're the ones writing laws. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 07:10 PM |
| 1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?I am asking TRPillers opinion. My perception is that TRP would agree that stereotypes should be promoted. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 07:09 PM |
| 1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?Capitalism is violence. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 07:08 PM |
| 1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?It's funny that all these Christians are defending the rich. Didn't Jesus tell the rich man to give his money away? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 07:08 PM |
| 2 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?I'll probably toss all the female ones in the trash to help me make a decision. Oh alright.... | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 07:07 PM |
| 1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?Where the hell have I said that I support affirmative action? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 07:05 PM |
| 2 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?Doesn't mean I'm wrong. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 07:05 PM |
| 0 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?TRP is promoting stereotypes for all women though. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 07:04 PM |
| 2 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?The only way men can get laid is by stereotyping all women and often promoting dubious science? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 07:03 PM |
| 0 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?Countries like the USSR were not communist, they were state socialist. Their purpose was to achieve communism. They failed for multiple reasons, but that doesn't mean we should give up on communism, | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 07:03 PM |
| 0 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?This is the rational conclusion if you believe all women are inferior to men like a lot of RPillers believe. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 05:12 PM |
| 0 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?The answer is yes. I don't think you can't deny many RPillers think all women are just mentally inferior and are highly suspicious even of so called "exceptions". | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 05:11 PM |
| 1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?Okay so I suppose the answer is yes? Should we also promote the stereotype that men are more violent and more likely to be pedophiles in your opinion? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 05:07 PM |
| 1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?That would basically be the result of stereotypes being promoted. Plenty of people would just be prejudiced even in the cases of exceptions. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 05:04 PM |
| 2 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?So basically women should have to work extra hard in life if they want to get ahead in order to overcome prejudice? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 05:02 PM |
| 1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?The point is should stereotypes be promoted like that even if they encourage discrimination on the basis of gender even in other aspects of life? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 04:58 PM |
| 1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?Communism was created mainly by men though. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 04:52 PM |
| 1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?Well, I am asking for your opinions. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 04:49 PM |
| 1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?Well, for example TRP does actively encourage these stereotypes. My point was should this streotyping really be actively encouraged by society? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 04:47 PM |
| 1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?That is wrong. Seriously, if you spend more time on RP circles you will see that there are Vanguards and ECs that believe women shouldn't vote because of their gender for example. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 04:45 PM |
| 2 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?They already have the right not to hire them as long as they don't say it's because they are women . The point is should discrimination based on gender be encouraged? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 04:44 PM |
| 0 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?Ok, so back to topic please? Should promoting stereotypes be acceprable even if it encourages discrimination? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 04:42 PM |
| 2 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?Are you denying that multiple RPillers read it politically? Because that would be delusion. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 04:41 PM |
| 2 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?There are many RPillers that think women should be legally discriminated against. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 04:40 PM |
| 1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?I disagree. Discrimination in the workplace does exist on some level. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 04:40 PM |
| 1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?For society. inb4 "society doesn't exist." | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 04:39 PM |
| 1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?I just meant this type of system we have now should be replaced. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 04:38 PM |
| 1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?Communism. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 04:37 PM |
| 2 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?TIL male communists don't exist. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 04:37 PM |
| 2 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?TRP says women are always more immature and irresponsible compared to men. http://no-maam.blogspot.gr/2012/06/woman-most-responsible-teenager-in.html They also say that women are solipsistic and irrational, while men are the rational ones. https://www.forums.red/p/RedPillWomen/1335/trp_xpost_red_pill_antibiotic_nuke_come_and_feed_by_illimita Women are irrational and inconsistent please do read the sidebar next time. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 04:36 PM |
| -1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?They promote the idea that all women are irresponsible, immature and irrational. This should logically affect more aspects of life than just dating. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 04:32 PM |
| 1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?So basically women have to try extra hard to prove themselves or else? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 04:26 PM |
| 0 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?I am a communist, I think there should be worldwide revolutions so that workers will gain control over the means of production. Obviously that would drastically change civilization as we know it. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 04:18 PM |
| -1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?So should women never be employed over any men because all men are more rarional and more responsible than women? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 04:15 PM |
| 1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?I just want western civilization to be replaced by something better. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 04:14 PM |
| 0 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?Capitalism. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 04:11 PM |
| 1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?Oh no, I just think civilization should collapse, so that we can reach a more advanced stage. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 04:11 PM |
| 1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?With all due respect, I think you missed the point. TRP promotes the idea that all women are irrational, irresponsible etc. etc. I meant that this mindset can promote discrimination in other aspects of liek like in the workplace and you can't deny that some RPillers indeed have that mindset. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 04:10 PM |
| 2 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?Civilization as we know it should be destroyed tbh. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 04:07 PM |
| 1 | Why should it be preferable to promote stereotypes even if they have some basis?You think discrimination on the basis of gender or race never happens? Really now? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 04:06 PM |
| 6 | MGTOW is the way to go (from an average man)Go MGTOW as much as you like, nobody has a problem with single men. The only thing I don't get is why some of them seem to hate women. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 03:38 PM |
| 1 | Q4W: "Emotional Connection," "Presence," ..what does it all mean?Most young people know at least basic English in Greece since they teach it at schools and also, they're encouraged to take English lessons outside of school. I am not sure how many exactly are fluent, but in my experience, it's not really rare. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 03:32 PM |
| 1 | Q4 All: Problems men face and what to do about them.Indeed. I wonder why it affects working class boys so much though. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 03:30 PM |
| 1 | Q4ALL: Have you ever misread someone's niceness as flirting?I don't think so. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 08:33 AM |
| 1 | Why do women want to see men cry so badly?I don't. I just want men to be able to express themselves freely. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 07:37 AM |
| 1 | There's no such thing as shit testsWhen they talk about shit tests they are usually talking about women being emotional, or women just being a bit bitchy. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 07:36 AM |
| 1 | Q4 All: Problems men face and what to do about them.I read somewhere that working class boys are more likely to have problems in schools. We should address it mainly as a class issue. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 07:36 AM |
| 1 | Marriage should be abolished, humans were never meant to be strictly monogamousMonogamy actually existed in hunters-gatherers societies too. Just serial monogamy. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 05:22 AM |
| 1 | Marriage should be abolished, humans were never meant to be strictly monogamousSays you. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 05:20 AM |
| 1 | Marriage should be abolished, humans were never meant to be strictly monogamous? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 04:51 AM |
| 1 | Q4W: "Emotional Connection," "Presence," ..what does it all mean?In Greece it's not rare for people to know English though. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/17 04:49 AM |
| 1 | Marriage should be abolished, humans were never meant to be strictly monogamousI meant that we should try to put an end to marriage by changing the economic system. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/17 04:53 PM |
| 3 | Q4W: "Emotional Connection," "Presence," ..what does it all mean?Sure I am not falling for people I find ugly. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/17 04:47 PM |
| 1 | Marriage should be abolished, humans were never meant to be strictly monogamousI didn't say it should be removed just because. I said we should work it out and solve the economic reasons behind it. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/17 04:30 PM |
| 2 | Q4W: "Emotional Connection," "Presence," ..what does it all mean?For me it means that you just feel very close to someone, like you enjoy their presence, you're interested in their well-being and thoughts, you want to share your concerns and problems with them. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/17 04:29 PM |
| 1 | Marriage should be abolished, humans were never meant to be strictly monogamousGuys marry because they're brainwashed and for legal benefits like tax cuts. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/17 04:22 PM |
| 1 | Marriage should be abolished, humans were never meant to be strictly monogamousThey get married for long term economic benefits (for example: if I get divorced I will get spousal support and child support) and also for some minor legal benefits that exist like tax cuts. I doubt most people would bother if it wasn't for these benefits. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/17 04:05 PM |
| 1 | Marriage should be abolished, humans were never meant to be strictly monogamousMost of these sound like silly reasons to get married. The real reason marriage was created in the first place was as an economic transaction and of course people won't openly say they get married for the economic reasons, but it doesn't mean they don't. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/17 03:57 PM |
| 1 | Marriage should be abolished, humans were never meant to be strictly monogamousYes, or else why marry and not just cohabit? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/17 03:39 PM |
| 2 | Marriage should be abolished, humans were never meant to be strictly monogamousMarriage will end once and for all when inequality to access to resources ends. However, I don't know why people defend marriage considering its massive failures. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/17 03:39 PM |
| 2 | Marriage should be abolished, humans were never meant to be strictly monogamousYou're free to get married. I didn't say it marriage needs to end forcibly. I just think it will happen naturally once certain material conditions change like it has happened with various other systems. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/17 03:26 PM |
| 1 | Marriage should be abolished, humans were never meant to be strictly monogamousThat's why I said we should find a way to solve these issues so that people would not get married just for economic reasons and some minor legal benefits. If those are the only reasons for marriage, then it doesn't sound like a worthy deal, especially considering all of the drawbacks it brings. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/17 03:21 PM |
| 2 | Marriage should be abolished, humans were never meant to be strictly monogamousIt exists for the economic protection of women and children and for some minor legal benefits. Or else why get married at all? Why not just cohabit and have a kid? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/17 03:14 PM |
| 3 | Marriage should be abolished, humans were never meant to be strictly monogamousAnd we should accept that why? Because Loki said so? Because the propaganda of the elites say so? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/17 03:06 PM |
| 1 | Marriage should be abolished, humans were never meant to be strictly monogamousThe thing is that people only marry for economic reasons. Or else, what is the reason? None. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/17 02:52 PM |
| 1 | Marriage should be abolished, humans were never meant to be strictly monogamousThe argument is not against monogamy. It's against legally binding monogamy. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/17 02:38 PM |
| 1 | Marriage should be abolished, humans were never meant to be strictly monogamousThis kind of monogamous marriage was created after the invention of agriculture which led to a rise in inequality. It was the same reason why the patriarchy rose. It all comes down to inequality to access to resources. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/17 02:37 PM |
| 1 | Marriage should be abolished, humans were never meant to be strictly monogamousFair enough. The argument here is not against monogamy. It's against legally enforced monogamy. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/17 02:02 PM |
| 1 | Marriage should be abolished, humans were never meant to be strictly monogamousWe don't have to prohibit it. Marriage will end naturally once the material conditions are right. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/17 01:54 PM |
| 1 | Marriage should be abolished, humans were never meant to be strictly monogamousOnce the material conditions are right, it will naturally happen. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/17 01:51 PM |
| 1 | Marriage should be abolished, humans were never meant to be strictly monogamousCollectivism vs individualism is a false dichotomy. Ensuring the well-being of the community also improves the well-being of the individual. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/17 01:48 PM |
| 0 | Marriage should be abolished, humans were never meant to be strictly monogamousWe will see then. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/17 01:18 PM |
| 1 | Marriage should be abolished, humans were never meant to be strictly monogamousYeah, but would they still do that if they had to get rid of their trash themselves (and I don't mean taking it to the bin)? Or if they had to grow their own crops? Why not? Technology allows us a lot of freedom from menial labor. Besides within the commune there could be agreements between people so that not everyone has to grow crops and take out the trash. For example, we could agree that I take care of the crops for one week and the next week someone else does it and then someone else etc.an… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/17 01:14 PM |
| 1 | Marriage should be abolished, humans were never meant to be strictly monogamousDo you want humans to find solutions to problems like "What is the world made of?" or "How do we stop out crops from dying?"? Is there proof that most scientists work primarily for profit? I think that's an oversimplified view. People like Galileo risked their lives for science. Not every scientist and innovator does it primarily for money. Some people just like what they're doing. There are even a lot of doctors that do volunteer work. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/17 12:56 PM |
| 1 | Marriage should be abolished, humans were never meant to be strictly monogamousSo poor capitalist countries exist? Shocking! | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/17 12:53 PM |
| 1 | Marriage should be abolished, humans were never meant to be strictly monogamousNo, I don't want to forcibly take people's rights away. I think when we achieve a better economic system, the end of marriage will happen naturally. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/17 12:51 PM |
| 3 | Marriage should be abolished, humans were never meant to be strictly monogamousReligious control over society will be ended once the elites are removed from power. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/17 12:50 PM |
| 1 | Marriage should be abolished, humans were never meant to be strictly monogamousActually I am more of a collectivist. I support a system that will be better for most people. It's not strictly about the individual well-being. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/07/17 12:48 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter