TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

thathighclassbitch Archive

View 0 posts and 306 comments by thathighclassbitch on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

no but you dont get it, if women get to be assholes, instead of fighting that we should enable MORE people to be assholes!!!/s
/r/MensRights18/11/22 02:03 PM
1

People like you are part of the problem. Literal oppressed minorities managed to change society facing assault, death, harassment, etc but you give up fighting what you believe in because society disagrees with you. That's a weak mindset that will lead you nowhere, except maybe to 4chan. People fought in the face of death and you give up because you might get cancelled on twitter.
/r/MensRights18/11/22 12:56 PM
1

Right, like I said. You're a crab in a bucket. "if women can kill kids, so should men" you cry, instead of fighting against killing children in the first place. * How about instead of trying to advocate for increasing the privileges of bigots, you fight against the privileges of other bigots? disclaimer this is just an example, not an actual statement
/r/MensRights18/11/22 12:51 PM
7

"if women can do shitty thing, men should be able to do shitty thing" or MAYBE advocate against men AND women doing these shitty things? What kinda crabs in a bucket mindset is OP trying to express here
/r/MensRights18/11/22 12:25 PM
-4

If they look like men, act like men, identify as men and are affected by male specific laws, then your exclusion of them means you don't advocate for the rights of all men. Only those you deem man enough. You don't decide who deserves mens rights and who doesn't. That's like saying you support men's rights, except fat men. Or tall men. Or whatever men.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 05:09 PM
3

A woman suffering delusions, but still a woman? Probably not. A trans man? Absolutely. You can't fight for mens rights if you're not fighting for all men.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 04:50 PM
2

Eh I'd kinda disagree. Mens rights should be for the rights of all men, not just those who you (a general "you" not a personal "you") deem valid men.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 03:36 PM
2

I love the enthusiasm but I do have to say that you can be straight and trans. The word you're looking for is cis or trans haha
/r/MensRights06/08/22 03:35 PM
6

Except OP was talking about men's rights as well, trans men's rights. And how often do people post here discussing men's rights movement vs women's rights movement and how they respectively treat issues? Quite a lot, so why is this any different?
/r/MensRights06/08/22 03:34 PM
1

My brother in christ when do you think it was "common" for women to have children every year and when do you think birth control was introduced
/r/MensRights02/08/22 11:35 AM
1

In the past women got sold to their husbands and didn't have any rights, I doubt they really cared much about what she wanted or needed you idiot.
/r/MensRights02/08/22 06:41 AM
1

I actually don't think so, no. Because it's normal for the first 6 to 9 months for their libido to be practically nonexistent after giving birth. And hormonal issues usually last about 6 months but can be longer for some women. And it's this lack of knowledge that causes these relationship issues. If you want a woman to carry your child, you will have to accept a lack of sex for what could be mere months or even maybe a year (including late stage pregnancy in thag statistic). Especially if you w…
/r/MensRights01/08/22 11:42 PM
1

Two. We have no idea how long ago she gave birth. Let’s say the child is now two years old. Would you say that he has a legitimate gripe? There’s a difference between him complaining after 6 weeks and complaining after 18 months don’t you think? OP left a comment saying the kid was 6 months old Three. There are cases of guys seeing their wives/partners “differently” when they’ve had a kid, and no longer having much sexual desire for them (Oprah had a show on this many years ago). I’ve not seen f…
/r/MensRights01/08/22 11:14 PM
1

Dude what are you on about, we were talking about the comments advising OP to sexually abuse his wife or chest on her 6 months postpartum because she isn't having enough sex with him. It wasn't about whether or not he forced her before, it's about the comments advising him to do so from now on. And ngl it IS kinda selfish to complain about your want for sex when your wife just fairly recently gave birth. Not so much wanting it, but to complain about it to this point does give me some red flags.
/r/MensRights01/08/22 10:54 PM
1

Yeah....like I said. Forcing your partner to have sex with you is rape regardless of gender. Not sure what you're arguing here since I never mentioned anything about "seduction". But Guilting and pushing your partner isn't seduction lol
/r/MensRights01/08/22 09:56 PM
1

Its funny cause this entire comment is you complaining about things I never said. I never said wanting sex wasn't natural, however, the comments are filled with people advising OP to cheat on his wife or rape his wife, after she just gave birth to their child. So to recap. It’s natural for someone “want sex”. I agree The issue, for me, is the feminist promotion of the idea that if a man pressures his female wife/partner/gf into having sex he’s some violator, but if a woman pushes for sex from he…
/r/MensRights01/08/22 10:20 AM
2

"im not crying!! I'm giving marriage advice to men while cheating on my wife!!! I totally fuck bitches I totally do!!!" lol
/r/MensRights31/07/22 04:03 PM
1

Rather think like a woman than think like a low IQ incel
/r/MensRights31/07/22 04:02 PM
2

im not emotionally fragile... Good luck... You're crying on reddit about hypothetical women not having sex with you
/r/MensRights31/07/22 07:31 AM
1

So you choose the typical female response of I'm a man lol You are exactly the type of female that a man should avoid. I'm a man lol Any woman that does not prioritize the needs of her man should be avoided at all cost. The minute she starts negotiating sex or trying to give reasons why she shouldn't, she's for the streets... Any man who doesn't prioritise the health and safety of their partner and baby should be avoided at all cost. The minute he starts making demands for sex while giving 0 fuc…
/r/MensRights31/07/22 07:30 AM
2

I didnt say so, but its about priorities. For many new mothers they are dealing with post partum hormones, doing the majority of childcare and then the husband gets upset that 3 weeks postpartum she isn't jumping for joy to sleep with him. Post birth, the needs of the one who got popped out and the onewho did the popping are a bit more important than his want to get his rocks off.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 10:41 PM
1

Yeah I just had a dude tell me I don't understand statistics cause "99% preventative means LESS than 1 in 100"
/r/MensRights30/07/22 09:28 PM
2

I didnt say you said that either lol I just said it's bad
/r/MensRights30/07/22 09:24 PM
2

You did say it causes long term pain, stop denying when you run out of arguments. Please show me where. Also where did I say women are forced to have IUDs. Still waiting. And let’s just ignore the fact that most anti abortion laws jail the doctor performing the abortion, not the women getting it. And? OK phrased differently. Either she dies or she has to find a doctor willing to go to jail for her.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 07:40 PM
1

I actually never once said it's eternal pain. I said getting it inserted hurts a lot. I never claimed an IUD causes long term pain, that's an argument you are making up yourself. And even then, let's say every women is capable of handling that pain. And every woman is insured. And every woman is willing to have a surgical procedure done every 5-10 years. And every woman isn't allergic or experienced negative side effects.. It's still not 100% effective and unlike alternative birth control, if yo…
/r/MensRights30/07/22 07:31 PM
1

Of course most women are forced to get IUDs. Whatever you say. Where did I say this? Please quote Let’s just ignore the fact that your source literally says the pain lasts for a minute or two, and any other pain can be medicated with ibuprofen. No we don't have to ignore that. So you admit it does indeed hurt, which the source says 77% experience severe pain? Again, when will you have something similar done to your penis? Since you don't mind 2 minutes of extreme pain done to genitals, I assume …
/r/MensRights30/07/22 07:21 PM
3

Wasn't trying to say people here massively agree with them, moreso that I can understand her response seeing those and when I first saw those comments they had up votes at the time. That was around the time she commented, and I downvoted most of those myself as well. They obviously aren't representative of the comments as a whole, but moreso the fact that there are a decent amount of them which were up voted at the time she commented. Anyone would get upset being linked this and seeing those com…
/r/MensRights30/07/22 07:14 PM
1

They literally explain its a painful procedure for most women, and women as a whole are very vocal about their experiences with getting an IUD. But yes, a man who will never have to get one is the expert. And even then that still ignores how uncomfortable it is to have to go pussy out in front of strangers just so you can have sex you didn't even want with a man who feels he's entitled to it
/r/MensRights30/07/22 07:07 PM
1

She literally had a child. Why are his sexual wants mroe important than the needs of his postpartum wife and their baby?
/r/MensRights30/07/22 06:59 PM
1

Yeah no, planned parenthood disagrees with you there. How does it feel to get an IUD put in? People usually feel some cramping or pain when they're getting their IUD placed. The pain can be worse for some, but luckily it only lasts for a minute or two. Some doctors tell you to take pain medicine before you get the IUD to help prevent cramps. Some discomfort is common and expected with an IUD insertion. It's been reported that 70% of people who have not given birth report feeling moderate discomf…
/r/MensRights30/07/22 06:57 PM
0

Probably because I'm not a woman, and IUDs are really fucking painful to get inserted for most women. Again, I assume you're getting something shoved in you as well to be fair right cause it's no big deal? And again, this entire argument started because you believe women should either take medication with heavy side effects or have painful birth control inserted in them by someone they may not be comfortable with, just so they can have sex they didn't even want to have in the first place.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 06:51 PM
0

So when will to start taking birth control, since you don't mind weight gain, headaches, trombophelitis, depression, dizziness, hives, acne, hair loss, sweating, peeing blood, fever, etc? Which aren't uncommon side effects, by the way. Especially the weight gain.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 06:42 PM
0

Oh boy you're that stupid huh... Thats STILL 1 in 100 women and its not 99% effective. It's only 99% effective is PERFECTLY Used and then STILL 1 in 100 women will get pregnant within a year. But this ignores human error, where it becomes 91% and thus 9 in 100 women. If you use it perfectly, the pill is 99% effective. But people aren’t perfect and it’s easy to forget or miss pills — so in reality the pill is about 91% effective. That means about 9 out of 100 pill users get pregnant each year.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 06:38 PM
1

You said it has no side effects. So yes in that case even one anecdote does disprove it. And even then, where did you get the info that it has no side effects? Causs they literslly list the side effects
/r/MensRights30/07/22 06:32 PM
2

Local man tells nurse and other person who's used birth control, how birth control works. Throws a hissy fit when they accurately guess he's a man who's never used birth control. More at 9
/r/MensRights30/07/22 06:32 PM
0

Dude...genuien question....if something is 91% effective, and thus 9% ineffective, how many people would thay be ineffective for? Also I cant get pregnant and have more money than my partner, so no im not really looking to leach. But thanks.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 06:31 PM
2

Hi I used non hormonal birth control! Itd shock you to know that medication will have side effects even when it's non hormonal! Hope this helped
/r/MensRights30/07/22 06:27 PM
1

A quote from his recent post lol As a guy, my initial thoughts are pretty much... Hes just butthurt I was correct in my assumption
/r/MensRights30/07/22 06:25 PM
1

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Hope that works but thats just some of the comments encouraging to force, guilt or push her into sex or to cheat on her
/r/MensRights30/07/22 06:23 PM
2

OK so to recap. You get mad when women dont have an excuse for unplanned pregnancies. But. They also need to have sex or you get mad. But. You also don't wanna take responsibility and get a vasectomy, instead a woman needs to take medication that leaves her with a 9/100 chance of getting pregnant, unplanned. And even then, even if you take other options, none of them are 100% effective. So you wanna guilt and force women to have sex, or else you get emotional and whine on reddit. But you also ge…
/r/MensRights30/07/22 06:19 PM
1

No I get that, I'm saying it's not an odd assumption to make due to the post these responses are on. Especially since a lot of these issues are commonly in long term relationships or marriages, so it isn't really an odd assumption to make. And even then, have you seem the comments? It's a whole lot of people telling OP to cheat on his wife, force her to have sex with him, etc after she jsut had a child. She's rightfully disgusted to see that to be quite honest.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 05:55 PM
0

I like how neither of those statements are true at all. Birth control has massive side effects on people. Mood switches, depression, massive weight gain even when rating less, etc. Often even side effects women aren't aware of because they're put on birth control as teenagers. Again, you'd rather have sex than have a healthy wife. You'd rather have a depressed, hormonal and dysmorphic wife but at least you get to bang because you might not get a kid out of it. I like how you, presumably a man, i…
/r/MensRights30/07/22 05:50 PM
-3

You do realizd birth control isn't 100% safe and has massive horrid side effects on your body? You'd rather have sex than have a healthy wife?
/r/MensRights30/07/22 05:42 PM
11

Do you often struggle with your reading comprehension or was this just a one off thing?
/r/MensRights30/07/22 05:41 PM
10

Had to scroll way too far down for some actual advice that isn't just "fuck her, cheat on her, force her to have sex with you" etc
/r/MensRights30/07/22 05:39 PM
7

How to nuke a relationship: a short guide
/r/MensRights30/07/22 05:37 PM
1

The OP says they had a kid, it's not an odd thing to write about in response then
/r/MensRights30/07/22 05:37 PM
4

While wanting sex isn't selfish, not having sex isn't selfish either and your advice is a recipe for disaster. Forcing your partner to have sex with you IS selfish and abusive. Desiring it, however, isn't. Not wanting sex isn't "withholding " sex.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 05:35 PM
3

Its a real mixed bag here tbh and depends on the post. Posts like this draw the incel type crowd out, whereas other posts people are a lot more laid back. But the comment section here is pretty damn insane lol. This has nothing to do with rights in the slightest.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 05:33 PM
1

Sure, but it still doesn't make any sense. You're bringing this up in light of the sex strike, which has a very real reason and isn't just out of spite. Whereas your proposition is...why? There's no real reason behind it from what I can tell.
/r/MensRights03/07/22 04:48 PM
-4

But why? Women going on sex strike is because they have their rights being taken away, and they dont wanna get pregnant so they wont have sex. But there's no reason to go on..an only fans strike?
/r/MensRights03/07/22 07:43 AM
1

Didn't expect to be served absolute facts by user soggy potato but here we are
/r/MensRights14/06/22 01:35 PM
5

Another "anyone who disagrees with me is a troll" guy, what a surprise
/r/MensRights14/06/22 10:00 AM
3

But thats not what the original post was about. What you're talking about is that you've consented ahead of time for that to happen, but what OP is describing is rape.
/r/MensRights14/06/22 09:52 AM
4

"If you don't let me derail conversations and start inappropriate discussions, its because you hate men"
/r/MensRights14/06/22 05:48 AM
4

It was a woman asking for advice about her partner having sex with her without her consent. Aka, rape. So when you make the radical feminist statement that "Because you don't do that on a post of someone asking for help for being raped", you are revealing your pathological hatred of men. You assume and leap to conclusions no one has made to get mad at a problem that doesn't even exist. Saying you shouldn't try to discuss mens issues on a post of a woman talking about having been raped isn't hatr…
/r/MensRights14/06/22 05:48 AM
2

Because you don't do that on a post of someone asking for help for being raped. Its not a gender thing, it's being a decent person and reading the room. You're putting words in my mouth that I never said (suggesting men can only add to an argument when those issues have been approved by women). No one said an argument needs to be approved by women, but there's a time and place for certain discussions and someone telling their story is not that place. Imagine walking into a conversation of someon…
/r/MensRights13/06/22 09:57 PM
6

That's actually called sexual coercion and regardless of if it's rape or not, it's abusive. Saying you won't do your chores unless your partner has sex with you is abusive.
/r/MensRights13/06/22 06:41 PM
8

Just because you like this, doesn't mean everyone does. This mindset sets up other men to be sexually assaulted because a minority enjoys consensual nonconsent.
/r/MensRights13/06/22 06:40 PM
0

I get your point but you didn't get backlash because they don't consider that rape, you got backlash because of where you decided to have that discussion when no one was arguing it wouldn't have been rape the other way around. I've actually seen several posts describing the same issue, but reversed the genders. And most comments also did, indeed, call it rape. I find it's a common issue on this sub to bring up issues in wrong places and then be surprised to get downvoted or shamed. Someone shari…
/r/MensRights13/06/22 06:38 PM
0

Great, merriam webster's definition isn't everyone's definition. We clearly have different definitions. Yours focuses on intent, mine focuses on actions. This is a feelings over facts style argument. By this thought pattern, I can redefine the definition of anything and everything under the guise of it being "my definition". Anyone can win an argument and make rules if they can bend the stated and generally agreed upon definition of words. Is me going into a rape survivors sub about how often wo…
/r/MensRights07/06/22 05:34 PM
1

Except that isn't trolling. And this is exactly why I don't think we should blanket ban "trolling", seeing as certain people think expressing differing opinions constitutes trolling. Expressing your opinions poorly, and not changing your mind, makes you ignorant or inconsiderate, but its not trolling. And my source is right hereand my source is right here Ironically, by my definition you aren't a troll. But by your own definition, you would be a troll. Seeing as you were shown the definition of …
/r/MensRights07/06/22 05:12 PM
2

I've funny enough also debated making a post addressing that myself haha. It really sets men's rights back a lot, since a lot of the time the bans are quite honestly very justified. They aren't discussing, but antagonizing people or inappropriately trying to argue on posts where those discussions just don't belong. Even if the post was wrong, if it was an emotional post or regarded a very heavy subject, coming in guns ablazing to not even discuss, but correct them, only makes you and your commun…
/r/MensRights07/06/22 05:08 PM
0

Oh I'm not mistaken as a troll, I just think OP would mistake me as a troll as he seems to feel a different opinion from his constitutes trolling. And its not my definition of trolling, but the definition of trolling I.e, : a person who intentionally antagonizes others online by posting inflammatory, irrelevant, or offensive comments or other disruptive content Expressing a differing opinion, even if poorly researched, thought through, argued, etc isn't trolling unless they are purposely saying …
/r/MensRights07/06/22 05:02 PM
2

Exactly! I quite honestly hold beliefs on both the feminist side and the MRA side, as I feel both have a range of different ideas I can agree or disagree with, but i hate that double standard where people will complain about silencing, downvoting and banning on other subs for voicing differing opinions but perpetuating that exact same issue here. Especially when i see the posts in question and it's just not the time and place to voice those opinions there. For example, a post about a rape victim…
/r/MensRights07/06/22 04:59 PM
0

I don't think the issue is the definition of trolling per se, I worded that poorly, but the definition of trolling is generally rooted in intent and you can't really know what someone's intent is most of the time. People say outrageous and stupid things in complete honesty all the time, and there's no real way to know if they're trolling or genuine.
/r/MensRights07/06/22 04:48 PM
4

Exactly, quite honestly I do feel a certain group of people on this sub don't seem to understand they're the other side of the coin they hate so much. Aka brigading, trolling, downvoting, etc anyone they disagree with and calling them feminist snowflakes in the same breath they complain about said feminists doing the same thing to them.
/r/MensRights07/06/22 04:46 PM
-1

Oh no i get that, I'm not saying it isn't easy to determine. However, I think OP specifically would count me as a radical feminist despite not being one, and thus his specific idea of banning radfems would be a poor one. Since if I remember correctly, and his post is the one I'm thinking of, those weren't radical feminists and as far as I'm aware not trolls either, but merely disagreed with him, his assumptions and his parenting. Not saying all people may have been civil, this is reddit and its …
/r/MensRights07/06/22 04:44 PM
1

I understand your point, but if I'm thinking of the right post OP is talking about I don't think that was a radical feminist trolling brigade whatsoever and OP would be calling for the ban of people who simply disagree with his view of men's rights. Cause I'm sure in OPs book, I'd probably count as a radical feminist trolling the forum whereas I'm really jsut engaging in discussion whilst having beliefs on both sides of the spectrum. Obviously trolling should be banned but i dont entirely trust …
/r/MensRights07/06/22 04:24 PM
3

I think i saw the post you are talking about, and I have to say I disagree. From what I saw it wasn't raided by actual "radical feminists", rather people who disagreed with you and i feel silencing voices you disagree with and labeling those voices as radically feminist purely because they don't line up with your idea of men's rights does more harm than good. If it's the post about the little boy who got a student aid and was questioned for a diagnosis, then I'd say that actually favours men's r…
/r/MensRights07/06/22 04:21 PM
5

I think you may have misread my comment. I meant that the stats of abusive people will most likely be higher if one group of people is more involved with the group of victims. For example, if we take 10 people who take care of children. 6 women, 4 men. And 3 women are abusing children, and 2 men are abusing children, It doesn't mean one gender is more abusive than the other, but that both genders can be equally as abusive but one gender happens to have more contact with children. I wasn't excusi…
/r/MensRights01/06/22 06:23 PM
22

I feel its kinda a self fulfilling prophecy. If one gender gets to choose whether or not a child is born, and then is also more likely to have primary custody, they are more likely to have the highest abuse rate as they would be in control of children more often. Doesn't excuse it, but it also isn't odd the numbers would hypothetically be much higher in the group where there's more contact with children. Especially when men have no choice in the conception of said kids.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 04:22 PM
2

"huh I didn't expect Alabama to be the one to- oh..."
/r/MensRights10/05/22 11:20 AM
1

When did I say that lol
/r/MensRights27/04/22 03:45 PM
1

you're (notice the 're?) Right, I'm not a woman. That's honestly the first thing you've been right about so far :)
/r/MensRights27/04/22 03:39 PM
1

I'm sorry, I say this sincerely and without any malice, but this is single handedly the lowest IQ response I have had the displeasure of reading in my life and is absolutely not the roast you seem to think it is lol. I hope you have a nice day and become a better person someday, truly. Yeesh
/r/MensRights27/04/22 03:38 PM
0

...the scenario of...a child being transgender and struggling with gender dysphoria, but their genitals would be harmed by wearing regular underwear and thus they can wear this which is specifically designed to not harm them? The underwear is just normal underwear, except designed to NOT harm them. You'd know that if you just looked it up, the article is incredibly misleading. Also the sizes are as small as to POSSIBLY FIT a 4 year old. They aren't actively being sold targeting 4 year olds.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 03:34 PM
0

Excuse me but are you comparing children wearing...children's underwear to rape?
/r/MensRights27/04/22 03:26 PM
2

Buddy you can't tell the difference between your and you're, don't know what the difference is between race, ethnicity and religion, don't know the definition of the word minority AND don't believe in science and medicine. I think you're the last person who should be saying "facts". Also if trans people are crossdressing homosexuals....gay people are also minorities lol
/r/MensRights27/04/22 03:18 PM
1

minority /mʌɪˈnɒrɪti,mɪˈnɒrɪti/ Leren uitspreken Definities bekijken in: All Electoral Law noun 1. the smaller number or part, especially a number or part representing less than half of the whole.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 03:06 PM
2

So you're saying over 50% of the human population is transgender?
/r/MensRights27/04/22 02:46 PM
2

this was the article where she explains the product And yes, that's the point. This underwear is specifically made to fit them, since cis girls underwear doesn't fit them and would harm their genitals (as it would do the exact thing people are upset about here, since its tight).
/r/MensRights27/04/22 12:48 PM
6

Sorry but hijacking the top comment cause i did some research. The underwear apparently isn't tucking or compression underwear. It's underwear made to fit comfortably while having a feminine design, cause girls briefs DO crush balls. They're specifically designed to NOT do that, but still look the same as girls underwear.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 12:29 PM
1

Except I didn't refute it at all. I said TRYING to help children. That doesn't mean it actually helps, however, the INTEND was to help. Again, I don't believe this should be sold as I don't think it provides enough, if any, help for transgender children compared to the consequences it can have on their health (I mean, they're children...there's not much to "tuck away" so it doesn't really assist much in social transition anyway). I can, however, see where her intend may have come from. She's a t…
/r/MensRights27/04/22 12:07 PM
0

Would you say the same thing about any other person trying to offer/sell medical and mental health products to help children? People can make poor choices and sell poor products without intending to harm people. Doesn't mean they're exempt from consequences, but it just means they never intended harm.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 11:54 AM
8

Thats usually it. This really wouldn't have been a huge issue (article/media/etc wise I mean) if it didn't involve a minority of any kind, especially trans people. They don't care about the wellbeing of boys and men, as much as they hate trans people.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 11:52 AM
0

Body dysmorphia and gender dysphoria are two different disorders, and detransitioners are a very loud minority. HOWEVER. I do agree this shouldn't be sold to/for prepubescent children. At best, it's uncomfortable. At worst, its harmful. But in either case, I feel there isn't much to tuck away for such a young child anyway. They can SOCIALLY transition perfectly fine without needing this.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 11:46 AM
1

How is that relevant? "I couldn't find fitting underwear 40 years ago, so transgender women/girls shouldn't be able to CHOOSE to wear tight underwear" is a very very odd response to have to this. The difference between your story, and my comment, is the choice aspect of the situation.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 11:37 AM
2

I mean quite literally the people being upvoted are those calling her a pedophile and shit. They assume intended harm and assume she's a pedophile, child abuser and misandrist. But those assumptions are fine, right?
/r/MensRights27/04/22 11:35 AM
8

Except I, for one, never disagreed about the harm it caused. And second, it's really not an odd oversight to make. It's not odd for a trans woman to feel that she, as a ballerina, got dysphoria as a child while dancing due to not being able to hide that so now she wanted to provide that product for others in that situation, completely forgetting the harm it can cause to children. The consequences really may not be so obvious when one is blinded by their own trauma and good intentions. Again, I d…
/r/MensRights27/04/22 11:08 AM
13

I said "think". I didnt say "there's without a doubt no intended harm". Everyone here assumes they intended to cause harm, yet if I don't assume that it's "it's impossible to know what the intention is"?
/r/MensRights27/04/22 10:41 AM
8

While I feel this is a great product to have for older transgender individuals, even teen individuals, it does feel strange and inappropriate for actual children. Even without the health risks it feels a bit odd, not once in my life can I recall...noticing a young boys...well...'bulge'...cause they're 4. There's nothing to really notice, let alone tuck away. This seems unnecessary at best, and indeed harmful at worst. There's better ways to socially transition if one pleases than overpriced poss…
/r/MensRights27/04/22 10:11 AM
5

With that personality im certain the feeling is mutual
/r/MensRights11/03/22 12:55 PM
2

Don't think that was his point. Moreso that he didn't understand how bad it was until he saw it happen to a man. But the fact you even need to see it happen to a particular gender to realize its a bad thing is insane to me.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 11:38 AM
16

Yeah the dude was also a fucking moron. If you need to see something bad happen to men, or someone of your gender in general, first before you understand how bad it is, something went wrong with your empathy somewhere lmao.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 11:36 AM
-3

But why is that the assumption for an older man, yet the assumption for an older woman is that she must be useless and a bad partner? And also to answer that, cause its creepy and there's a power imbalance. And additionally it shows that they are going for fresh graduates purely for legality, and would go younger if it was legally permitted.
/r/MensRights30/10/21 04:12 PM
5

So you suggest trans women, aka your fellow women, should use the mens bathroom, because you feel men could be of danger to women? Using that same logic, how are these same men not also a threat to those women being forced into the mens bathrooms?
/r/MensRights30/10/21 02:20 PM
1

Ah yeah sorry the post implied, to me, that it shouldn't matter if we perceive trans women as men. But I get the point, I think. Your point is that the discrimination and hatred shouldn't matter, even if they were to be feminine men, since men should also be able to break gender norms, correct? Edit: ps sorry if my initial comment may have been defensive in any way, I've seen a lot of transphobia on this sub as well. Its incredibly wishy washy around here.
/r/MensRights30/10/21 02:05 PM
4

Who's "you"?
/r/MensRights30/10/21 01:54 PM
5

Besides the fact that its not a mental illness... Your idea of solving this hypothetical mental illness...is to....bully and take away rights? Do you solve other illnesses that way too? Boy am I glad you're not my doctor lmao
/r/MensRights30/10/21 01:51 PM
1

Its ok, you can say TERFs lmao
/r/MensRights30/10/21 01:47 PM
2

I think thats moreso cause the 'fear' stems from men, and they dont see trans men as 'real men' so they dont fear the idea of trans men as much. (Until they see a trans man walk into the womens bathroom cause of their own stupid laws theyre trying to make) Trans women: scary men in dresses preying on women and children Trans men: poor confused girls tricked and forced to transition
/r/MensRights30/10/21 01:46 PM
0

Ngl yall, are massively missing the point. Yes, transmysoginy is largely rooted in misandry (aka, trans woman are scary cause men are bad), however, suggesting that it should be fine to consider trans women as men, and to suggest or imply trans women are the same as feminine or gender nonconfirming men, is incredibly trandphobic. While misandry is involved in the discussion, its not ABOUT men in this case, and I think its inappropriate to try and latch onto that discussion. But, this is a discus…
/r/MensRights30/10/21 01:43 PM
4

@ the comments, It feels a bit ironic to complain about how if a woman is in her 40s, she has nothing to offer and there's a reason she's single, yada yada. Yet yall can't see the irony that this easily applies to older men as well, and it often does. Take it as you will, I will not trust anyone who cant find anyone their own age who could tolerate them and feels the need to scoop a fresh high-school graduate up since thats the only person who will put up with them. No matter their gender.
/r/MensRights30/10/21 01:35 PM
2

I so wanna correct that they dont seem to discriminate on sexual orientation, as nowhere was sexual orientation mentioned
/r/MensRights18/10/21 07:36 AM
1

Sure thing buddy
/r/MensRights14/09/21 02:14 PM
0

Im literally not but OK lol ill gladly go elsewhere cause I have no clue what your deal is
/r/MensRights14/09/21 02:12 PM
0

Im really not. You're accusing me of doing something I never did, and im asking you to provide evidence for your claims. Thats all. And the fact that you're reflecting shows you have none.
/r/MensRights14/09/21 02:08 PM
0

Im just asking where I said what you're accusing me of saying lol
/r/MensRights14/09/21 02:00 PM
0

Except...I never did that. Please quote where I said "women rape/sexually assault less than men". Like not once did I say that, or anything remotely close to it lmao
/r/MensRights14/09/21 01:38 PM
0

Literally what truth am I ignoring? I don't even know why or what you're arguing here. Literally all I've said is that your claim on female sexual assault perpetrators are DEBATABLE, I didn't disagree causs i litteraly DONT KNOW as there aren't trustworthy statistics on female on male sexual assaults and how it compares, specifically on the issue in the OP. It seems like you're arguing with me for the sake of arguing, and not actually having an endgoal to convince me on. This entire conversation…
/r/MensRights13/09/21 08:10 PM
0

yes, cause butt squeezing and shit like that isn't the same as rape So its not relevant to THIS conversation
/r/MensRights13/09/21 08:00 PM
0

Dude, you're comparing oranges to lemons. They have similarities but they aren't the same. Sexual assault and rape statistics aren't the same and shouldn't be treated as such, and thus they aren't relevant.
/r/MensRights13/09/21 07:15 PM
0

Yes we have those stats, but it wasn't about rape so they're not relevant. And unless you have stats on sexual assault, its debatable. Again, I'm not debating if its even. You claimed almost every high school girl commits sexual assault. Thats claiming about 90% of women commit sexual assault, if not more.
/r/MensRights13/09/21 06:48 PM
0

You said more, not about as much. I agree its similar, but you said almost all women/girls in high school. Also we weren't talking about rape, we were talking about sexual assault. Your claim that almost all girls in high-school sexually assault men is debatable, as I cant prove or disprove it right now but its a huge claim.
/r/MensRights13/09/21 03:39 PM
0

"Women commit most sexual assault" Debatable, but then they should be punished properly for sexual assault "YoU WaNnA RemOvE AlL wOmEn fRoM ScHoOlS!!!???"
/r/MensRights13/09/21 03:31 PM
0

OK but I just said they should both be punished so
/r/MensRights13/09/21 03:06 PM
0

Thats really not something we can prove right here and now. Data is skewed and we both know that.
/r/MensRights13/09/21 03:02 PM
0

I mean I know for a fact that its not all girls vs a few boys lmao
/r/MensRights13/09/21 02:31 PM
0

Well they should be held to that standard as well lmao
/r/MensRights13/09/21 05:02 AM
1

Im not american, so no. And here you wouldnt just get...thrown into jail and im not advocating for just throwing them into jail. But it IS sexual assault, and deserves more than just a slap on the wrists and should be reported to police. As you say, there's more than two options. Letting this behaviour be known to police, and possibly getting legal trouble, does not have to mean throwing them into jail.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 08:31 PM
6

Not for a slight touch, but for sexual assault yes. Sexual assault is one of the few crimes that shouldn't go unpunished just because someone happens to be 16. You aren't raising children, you're raising adults. And letting them get away with sexual assault only makes them bolder in the future.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 07:05 PM
-1

I dont think you can really compare that honestly. The best comparison is just...exactly the same. A girl touching a guys ass.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 07:01 PM
5

So you suggest sexual assault, which is already all too common in high school, should just get a slap on the wrist?
/r/MensRights12/09/21 06:57 PM
1

Mental health delays may VERY VERY VERY rarely maybe be an excuse, but ADHD pretty much never is. Caus ethe mental delay isn't big enough to excuse it in any way. If they're 16, and the mental delay is, let's say, that of a 12 year old. A 12 year old does, and should, know better than to touch people without consent as well. Maybe you could argue criminal charges when there's such a huge delay, but its pretty rare compared to the amount of sexual harassment teenage boys seem to commit in schools
/r/MensRights12/09/21 02:38 PM
8

Yeah I'm aware, I was initially just diagnosed with a developmental delay, only to later be diagnosed with adhd and autism. I just hate when it's referred to as an excuse for sexual harassment.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 02:32 PM
37

Dude, I HAVE ADHD and had an emotional growth stunt, that does not in any way excuse or give leeway to sexually assaulting other people. None. So like I said, 15/16+ is well old enough to have some form of criminal record if you sexually assault someone.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 01:41 PM
71

Depends on the age. Anything 16 or 15+ I feel is okd enough to basically have the saying "if you can do the crime, you can do the time" be applied to them. And again, that also counts for if the genders are reversed.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 12:13 PM
0

Yeah I dont think I'm gonna believe someone on such a nuanced issue when they can't even type out a coherent sentence
/r/MensRights11/09/21 11:02 AM
0

Treating a mental health issue is hardly a lifestyle
/r/MensRights11/09/21 09:01 AM
2

Yeah but those studies lack a lot of context. A lot. It doesn't include comorbid mental health issues, WHY they committed suicide, whether I'd was due to dysphoria or due to social stigma, etc. Life, post op, is still and will always be harder as a trans person as opposed to the life of a cis person. Thats just fact. Surgery makes it easier to be yourself and live a happier life, but it doesn't cure transphobia, being disowned, being attacked, or whatever other mental disorder you already had or…
/r/MensRights11/09/21 08:56 AM
6

As someone who's ftm i do wanna correct that its not regret. The percentage of people who genuinely regret transitioning is astronomically low. But, there is indeed a lot of social changes that can be hard to face, especially if you transition later I think. But theres also a few social benefits, I've experienced. Not much more, just slight benefits I've seen in mental health diagnosing. But thats about it. Trans men also tend to face 'worse' misandry in some aspects, as while cis men already of…
/r/MensRights11/09/21 08:49 AM
1

I honestly try to refrain from having an opinion on that as I never want to have children, so I have not and will never experience childcare to that degree. Logically id think so too, but there's also a reason why I wouldn't want kids and would rather do physical labour than to raise one lol
/r/MensRights03/09/21 07:47 PM
1

I mean, I do believe the work should be split when both partners at home since that follows the line of thinking of "being a SAHM is a job". If both have worked that day, one at a job and the other at home with the children, then its only fair that any night duties are split. Not just the husband coming home to 'give the wife a break'.
/r/MensRights03/09/21 06:08 PM
0

Thought you were referring to my own comment, but yeah we can't take the OOP at face value. However, I was speaking of stories posted here where its specified that the partner is a SAHM.
/r/MensRights03/09/21 05:32 PM
2

Wife chooses to be a stay at home wife
/r/MensRights03/09/21 04:45 PM
285

This has always been an issue for me on reddit. Its the same story. Wife chooses to be a stay at home wife, gets upset husband has to compensate and often work up to 80 hours a week because of her choice, husband is called an asshole for not doing all the childcare once he gets home to 'give her a break, husband is called an asshole for working so much, etc. But no one asks when he gets his break? They say childcare is a full job, but also the husband should take care of the kids once he gets ho…
/r/MensRights03/09/21 07:37 AM
7

Or don't hit kids in general lmao wtf
/r/MensRights02/09/21 06:47 AM
0

Huh, interesting. I'm a bit iffy about cheating statistics, cause there's so many conflicting stats out there. But when I first looked it up the top few sources said men cheat more, so I went with that. But admittedly a lot of those stats were self admitted cheaters I believe.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 09:32 AM
3

Sorry but I wont debate about sexism, plain and simple. Housework isn't a womans duty, and that thought pattern contributes to the high divorce rates. You ask questions you yourself are part of the answer to. You either get off your lazy ass and contribute equally to the household, as a grown man, or she divorces you and rightfully so. It's not an honor to raise a manchild.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 09:25 AM
1

Yeah I dont understand the lack of commitment, though that can mean many things. I read it as in, both partners didnt expect it to be that much of a big commitment. However, housework isnt a wifely duty if both are working. Women arent maids. If both parties are working members of society and the relationship, housework should be split as such. If the woman is working full time and doing all the housework, and their husband also works fulltime (or maybe even less), then no he isnt contributing e…
/r/MensRights25/08/21 01:25 AM
2

I never said which unrealistic expectations. Those were just general numbers. OP of this comment also didnt specifically say which unrealistic expectations. I simply stated that unrealistic expectations are a common factor in divorce, statistically. The statitistics arent skewed, the statistics just arent evidence specifically produced to prove your point, which wasnt one I was trying to prove in the first place.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 11:01 PM
-1

Unrealistic expectations 45% I never specifically explained which unrealistic expectations, I simply said unrealistic expectations in general.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 10:54 PM
8

Finances was also one of the top reasons actually!!! I just named a few top ones and more relevant ones:) Also ngl i cant really speak on relationship dynamics with women, both cause i dont wanna make a general statement about my minor experiences, but also cause... I have no experience with women haha. I'm not into women myself, so I can't really speak on that, only on common stories and statistics. I can probably link back the cheating stuff if you want? It's nothing special I didn't do some h…
/r/MensRights24/08/21 06:52 PM
9

Actually not entirely wrong. 45% of divorces were due to unrealistic expectations. The top reason, is lack of commitment. Followed by arguing. And then the 3rd is cheating. With cheating, the lesser earning partner is more likely to cheat. However, men are more likely than women to cheat when they're financially dependent on their partner. Men in general are more likely to cheat on their partner, however, women have started cheating more compared to about 2 decades ago. Maybe a slight devil's ad…
/r/MensRights24/08/21 04:29 PM
2

In theory yeah, it just doesnt work in practice cause you'll be called every type of bigot under the sun and theyll take your statement at face value. IE, if you say "this is just as bad as saying all women are trash" theyll only take the "women are trash" part and run with it. Eye for an eye SHOULD work, but sadly it more often that not doesnt cause they are aware of what they're saying, but jsut value one group less than another so in their mind it isnt as bad.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 11:08 AM
3

It did, it was mostly on tiktok and twitter but it sure did happen. Not sure if you missed the whole "rape all women day" a couple months back. But they specifically chose rape since it's already a very touchy subject in womens rights and such, and doing so made people just more mad, not go "hm...now that you reversed it, it indeed does sound bad" and it gave MRAs an even worse rep.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 10:16 AM
1

Yeah no that's the best honestly. I merely said it since "kill all men" got a proportionate response, so if any fool decides to retort, at least do it properly.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 08:51 AM
6

That's fair, I'm mostly pointing it out for anyone who does end up replying to that with anything. Since the kill all men was met with rape all women, which was never going to be received well but was received worse cause it was purposely changed to rape. If anyone feels the need to respond to such things by swapping the gender, ONLY swap the gender. Dont alter the phrase. It destroys the intended purpose of the retort.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 08:48 AM
11

That shouldnt be the retort if you wanna make a retort at all, since you're purposely changing it to "sluts". They arent saying "men are sluts". The only retort should be "women are trash" if you wanna make any similar retort at all. You WILL get called out for changing it from "trash" to "sluts" and no ones gonna listen to you at all.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 07:54 AM
0

Yeah I see it happen a lot on this sub, where people unpromptly mention their distaste, disagreement, etc with feminism or about certain gendered topics. That's a part of the reason why people dislike us here. And while I get why yall say it like that, most people dont and it wont go over well.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 10:41 AM
0

I think cause it wasnt the time or place to mention your distaste. "I dont like X group, BUUUUT" usually doesnt really fo over well when no one asked whether you like said people or not.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 05:03 AM
9

Ngl dude, dont think that was the time or place to say that. It comes off as blaming her for her partners behaviour. I dont think that was your intent, but that's the way it comes across.
/r/MensRights05/07/21 05:26 AM
1

You honestly want us to believe that you ask for consent EVERY TIME you touch your sexual partner in any sexual manner whether it’s part of the same sexual encounter or not? Bullshit! You’re either lying or you’ve never had sex, because, for anybody who’s actually had sex would know - it’s a total wet blanket that is more likely going to turn your sex partner completely off than that lead to anything else. Yes. Yes we do. We even ask during sex. And no, it doesnt turn either of us off. It make s…
/r/MensRights27/06/21 10:34 PM
1

So many words, yet you still said absolutely nothing. Way to ignore an entire comment. Reading comprehension really isnt one of your greater skills, is it? All you've done so far is not read, make assumptions, and accuse people of things that arent even relevant. I never said any of that, but alright! YOU said "playfully touch". I just responded to that. OP: hey guys, my ex forced herself on me when I said no. Was I ra- You: WELL YOU SEE, WHEN I SLAP MY WIFES ASS- And no, I'm not guilty of touch…
/r/MensRights27/06/21 11:33 AM
1

Genuinely dont listen to him. Hes purposely twisting the story and making it about something totally different (touching your partner vs having your way with your partner) this was rape. Plain and simple.
/r/MensRights27/06/21 07:35 AM
1

Do you honestly get prior verbal consent every time you playfully touch your girlfriend or boyfriend? You can stop right there. She didnt 'playfully touch him'. She had sex with him without his consent, and when he actively and repeatedly said no. My wife slapping my butt when I’m bent over doing something must be considered sexual battery? Putting my hands on her body while kissing her makes me a dangerous offender? She RAPED him. She actively inserted it. She didnt just 'touch him'. He said no…
/r/MensRights27/06/21 07:33 AM
5

Oh you dont have to tell me buddy, I already replied to his comment. Was halfway through reading this post when I realized where it was going to, and hes just throwing a temper tantrum cause not everyone agrees with his fucked up worldviews. And everyone who disagrees, is a feminist.
/r/MensRights26/06/21 05:44 PM
6

If you click the link, hes actively saying it's not rape cause the rapist didnt rape him long enough
/r/MensRights26/06/21 05:35 PM
9

He was making a few decent points (the drunk sex, 15 years being a lot for that crime, etc etc) until I realized this is the same man who's now just making a rage post about how people downvoted him when he defended rape. Like. Actual rape.
/r/MensRights26/06/21 05:27 PM
8

this wasn't someone completely uncaring of your consent. Then what would you call someone who ignores someone saying no to sex, and proceeds to force them to have sex? (Aka, rape). I certainly wouldnt call it caring about his consent.
/r/MensRights26/06/21 11:16 AM
3

This case is genuinely very saddening but it very interestingly proves that gender isnt nurture, but nature, and that no one is just "choosing a gender" so to speak when it comes to mtf or ftm individuals
/r/MensRights17/06/21 04:25 PM
2

I hope you get to do the same someday!!:)
/r/MensRights12/05/21 01:06 PM
2

Ah yeah I'm so sorry about that:( I used to identify as gender fluid! Until I realized that it was jsut internalized transphobia/sexism for me ajdbjd (felt like men couldnt be feminine)
/r/MensRights12/05/21 01:01 PM
2

Ohhh yeah fair, I wouldnt be surprised honestly
/r/MensRights12/05/21 12:57 PM
2

I'm trans but genuine question, since I didnt see the post, how was it transphobic? This is genuine I'm just missing something here :)
/r/MensRights12/05/21 12:51 PM
3

I saw the title and literally clicked just to point out how homophobic it is. That subreddit is so blinded by sexism, they became homophobic on top of it.
/r/MensRights12/05/21 07:21 AM
3

I dont see it often but this quite literally felt like the epitome of "dont argue with stupid" holy shit
/r/MensRights04/01/21 07:58 PM
3

Thank fuck I'm not the only one who saw this shit thank you
/r/MensRights04/01/21 07:55 PM
2

Good bot
/r/MensRights04/01/21 10:05 AM
2

Being gay...isnt a lifestyle choice...so you cant disagree with it. Get that through your thick skull. "Former gay people" ARENT A THING. You cant prove they arent gay anymore or were ever gay. It's just their words. That's no evidence. And funny enough they almost ALWAYS are religious. Funny how that works. That doesnt prove anything. That's anecdotal and just shows people experiment with LABELS. And just because the majority is straight doesnt mean it's the best thing. Han Chinese is the major…
/r/MensRights04/01/21 10:05 AM
2

Dislike and disagree are 2 different things. You can dislike a fact, you cant disagree with a fact. Cause being gay isnt a choice, so you cant disagree with it. You keep saying "wrong" but refuse to give me any sources. I gave you sources. ""Show me evidence!!! No not evidence that actually goes against my homophobic claims!!! And I wont show you any evidence for my claims!!! Source: trust me bro god said so"" - That's nothing but a childish tantrum Finally something we can agree on! It is a chi…
/r/MensRights04/01/21 09:35 AM
2

For someone who likes to harp on about facts you sure like to ignore fact....you cant disagree with someones sexuality. Someones sexuality is fact. "I'm gay" "well I disagree, you arent gay". Being gay isnt an opinion you can disagree on. Also you're no psychologist either...I actually gave you sources, you didnt. Try again. Also "changed for the better"...again. homophobic. Also homosexuality isnt a crime against nature, it's natural and has evolutionary purposes and many animals have shown to …
/r/MensRights04/01/21 09:19 AM
2

Its all speculation and it's a complex subject, so I cant say for certain it's the truth. But I think those aspects play heavily into the numbers. Numbers are good, they give us an estimate of things. But in cases like these it's also harmful. Cause it again makes people think men arent being abused, and gives gay men a false sense of safety. And it gives homophobic people a straw to grasp onto. So I'd be interested in them doing more research on this. And as for me it's a mix of both. I often d…
/r/MensRights04/01/21 07:05 AM
3

You can dislike as much as you want, you cant disagree. Those are 2 different things. Still makes you homophobic though. Not wrong, you're just homophobic. That doesnt mean they're changing sexuality. That means they're changing their descriptor. Those are 2 different things. Someone saying "I'm X" and then saying "I'm Y" doesnt mean their sexuality has changed, it means the label changed. Also funny how you didnt provide any evidence yourself but sure thing... We identified 47 peer-reviewed stu…
/r/MensRights04/01/21 07:02 AM
3

Disagreeing with straight people isnt the same as disagreeing with being straight. You cant disagree with someones existence. You can disagree with the things they say. And there are no 'former gay people'. Only former confused straight people and abused gay people. You cant change sexuality, but you can abuse someone into believing being gay is wrong and theyre actually straight.
/r/MensRights04/01/21 01:20 AM
3

Disagreement isn't necessarily, no. But you dont have to hate gay people to be homophobic. And you cant "disagree" with being gay. Being gay isnt an opinion. And you compared it to white people, so it's not irrelevant. And wow! Its almost like LGBT people have a lot of problems cause they face constant abuse from society....
/r/MensRights04/01/21 01:08 AM
4

Ah so you decided you didnt like the definition, so you're changing it. Cause apparently facts are facts unless you dont like those facts. Gotcha. If you dont like fact, you just call it a buzzword! Also gays can be white
/r/MensRights04/01/21 12:35 AM
2

"Facts dont care who you are" is a very strong thing to say when you straight up deny facts and alter definitions of words...but ok <3
/r/MensRights04/01/21 12:17 AM
2

Ok good for you, lil man
/r/MensRights03/01/21 11:53 PM
1

Oh no I meant peas. Just several peas rattling around in that little skull of yours.
/r/MensRights03/01/21 11:41 PM
2

I didnt say I was clever. I said you dont get to tell people whether or not they're clever whilst having peas for brains.
/r/MensRights03/01/21 11:38 PM
2

But it's the post I was saying was homophobic!!
/r/MensRights03/01/21 11:36 PM
1

Buddy I...I dont think you of all people have any right to tell anyone how clever they are. I've been talking to a brick wall. I doubt you know anything really. Christ. I spoon fed you the post, yet you still deny it.
/r/MensRights03/01/21 11:34 PM
2

I think it's a mix of both, really. We tend to also be a bit more "we got out, so its fine now"i think. At least that was it for me. I still have trouble recognizing what he did as abuse, even though it was very clearly abusive. I dont doubt a lot of other men feel that way too, whereas women are genuinely taught more about signs of abuse and how to recognize them. No doubt it's a mixed bag of reasons, but I think it starts at men reporting less and women reporting more, and from there you can d…
/r/MensRights03/01/21 11:33 PM
1

Yes! That persons first post! Their first post is about how homosexuality is a sin. Not THIS post. This post isnt even THEIR post! Please I BEG of you just read back. I wasnt replying to the person who posted this post, that was someone else. THIS IS THE HOMOPHOBIC POST, NOT THE ONE ABOUT LESBIAN ABUSE
/r/MensRights03/01/21 11:27 PM
3

I obviously wont state it as fact! But I think it holds a lot of merit. Mens abuse statistics are low due to a lack of reporting, right? So put 2 men in a relationship, and they wont be as likely to report abuse. Whereas women are more likely to report abuse, so have 2 in a relationship and both are more likely to report it. It creates false statistics. Ofcourse this doesnt have to be the only reason! And other interpretations can work. But I highly doubt its because gay men dont suffer in abusi…
/r/MensRights03/01/21 11:26 PM
3

THIS POST isnt homophobic. But that isnt the original poster. THAT PERSON who I responded to has a post on their page, the 1st one youd see, and its homophobic. I'm not lying, you're just incredibly, incredibly, incredibly dense to a point where I'm genuinely worrying for your mental wellbeing.
/r/MensRights03/01/21 11:17 PM
3

Oh no I know, it just makes you look incredibly foolish cause it makes absolutely no sense
/r/MensRights03/01/21 11:14 PM
3

....that's heterophobia now? That has nothing to do with them being straight or my feelings towards straight people. That was his post straight up being homophobic.
/r/MensRights03/01/21 11:12 PM
3

Oh no I just asked where I was heterophobic. Since I can show you where they were homophobic, so I'd like to see where I was heterophobic. I dont mind labeling, just be accurate.
/r/MensRights03/01/21 11:11 PM
3

Ok? That's good...I guess? More power to you
/r/MensRights03/01/21 11:05 PM
6

Dude I'm starting to think your ex wasnt the narcissistic one....or at least not the only problem
/r/MensRights03/01/21 10:59 PM
3

"Lived experiences". My experience is females ARE violent!! It is no good trying to rubbish the author. Females are still just as violent as males. Too bad if you can't handle the fact! Dude this entire comment is you yelling at me for supposedly saying females arent as violent??? You literally said too bad if you cant handle that fact! Genuinely are you okay?????
/r/MensRights03/01/21 10:57 PM
2

Dude I.. literally didnt lie. Not sure what you're going on about. I did call someone homophobic, that person was being homophobic, that person wasnt OP. Wheres the lie?
/r/MensRights03/01/21 10:53 PM
0

...no? Cause that wasnt OP? And dont be homophobic if you dont wanna be labelled homophobic?
/r/MensRights03/01/21 10:48 PM
1

...yeah I never did
/r/MensRights03/01/21 10:35 PM
2

I didnt say females arent as violent??? Like...literally never said that and entirely agree both genders can and will be equally violent. The "lived experiences" refers to the outing within LGBT communities. Maybe grow a pair of eyes and a reading comprehension next time??
/r/MensRights03/01/21 10:35 PM
3

....where...was I heterophobic lmao????
/r/MensRights03/01/21 10:29 PM
7

I think the difference is that men dont report abuse as much as women. So gay couples have 2 people who are less likely to report, whereas lesbian couples have 2 people who are more likely to report.
/r/MensRights03/01/21 08:49 PM
2

Yeah it was me, the big bad LGBT who sabotaged your study link lmao. Again, you're reaching. And you are taking information from biased sources without context,whereas I'm taking information from both sources and lived experiences. And you dont know the definition of homophobia, not even the definition of phobia in and of itsself. And apparently you're not just homophobic but also antisemitic. It's funny how that works....
/r/MensRights03/01/21 08:36 PM
5

Oh fuck that's also true, theres double the numbers if men dont report
/r/MensRights03/01/21 08:31 PM
2

That's...not what you said though. You were implying people of the LGBT community caused the link specifically not to work. That's...an incredible reach. Also that outing seems...like a fairly rare thing. I'm LGBT, most of my close friends are LGBT, and I've never heard of that happening. That obviously doesnt mean it doesnt happen, I bet it has happened, but you're acting like it's some common thing that happens. It really isnt. And obviously stats are going to be flawed. Those are already stat…
/r/MensRights03/01/21 08:25 PM
8

I think this might partially stem from the stereotype of lesbians relationships moving faster. I doubt it's a case of "lesbian bad" but a lot of lesbian relationships tend to move faster (such as moving in faster) so you wouldnt identify red flags until it's too late. A lot of people will obviously break up at earlier red flags before moving in together,so that avoids a domestic violence situation. But since some move in together really fast, I think that might contribute to the numbers. ETA: I'…
/r/MensRights03/01/21 06:51 PM
6

That's actually a good point, hadnt thought about that one! I'd previously heard the numbers were pretty high, but it's kinda unfair to use that number as an argument to be homophobic (regardlessof of if the numbers truly are higher). Cause it seems like it boils down to the same reason domestic violence numbers are lower for male victims: we only count reports, not actual incidents.
/r/MensRights03/01/21 06:46 PM
6

I mean that's kind of a reach. Doubt the big bad LGBT made sure the link doesnt work. Its probably just a mistake.
/r/MensRights03/01/21 06:44 PM
1

Man whilst this is incredibly smart, it also really sucks since shit like this (and Canadian government allowing this kinda shit) heavily inconveniences actual trans people
/r/MensRights02/01/21 03:14 PM
17

There's a bunch more people calling the kid gay
/r/MensRights28/07/20 02:58 PM
1

I mean, you can turn this around as well. They could say the same thing about the men's rights movement. Needing/wanting rights doesn't make a group of people inferior to the group of people who do have those particular rights. Kinda a shit meme.
/r/MensRights20/07/20 05:30 PM
2

It's not even just gay men, it's bisexual and trans men too then i assume.
/r/MensRights29/06/20 11:26 AM
3

Also funny comments like "no, PENIS pass denied" which implies the opposite of this is common enough to deserve a term, kinda destroying the purpose of this sub (you can't get away with shit based of gender if both genders get away with it... Based on their gender...) This entire post is an oxymoron and yet everyone participating thinks they're the smartest in the room.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/06/20 12:13 PM
2

It's very rich that incels are the ones overrunning a subreddit specifically made to point out injustice. Like... None of these people here are any better then the people put on display here. These people are inherently as bigoted and bad as the people they're trying to shame here. "sexism against men is bad, but discriminating against other people good" is what this sub has become. Yet no galaxy brain here has the mental capacity to realise... Hey.. Maybe both are bad. ETA it's funny how they s…
/r/PussyPassDenied15/06/20 12:05 PM
0

OK doctor starmind0 I'm sure you've done your research
/r/PussyPassDenied15/06/20 11:59 AM
0

Glad there's still a few intelligent people in this hellhole sub
/r/PussyPassDenied15/06/20 11:58 AM
-2

Guess we are going down together, huh. Pointed this out as well, - 60.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/06/20 11:56 AM
-64

Since when is transphobia "pussy pass denied"
/r/PussyPassDenied15/06/20 07:03 AM
19

She obviously has the right to make an onlyfans, but he 100% has the right to not wanna date someone with an onlyfans. Disgusting that he voiced his concerns and she completely ignored his discomfort.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/05/20 06:13 PM
16

Yeah exactly lmao! That doesnt count as consent
/r/MensRights06/05/20 01:36 PM
63

"you cant get a hard on if you arent aroused" pretty sure thats bullcrap, especially for teenage boys
/r/MensRights06/05/20 01:24 PM
81

Sorry but thats awful anatomy
/r/MensRights28/04/20 06:58 PM
9

No sex is better than another, and none should have to respond that way. Its unfair as hell, but sadly it is the way we have to respond most of the time, or else we prove them 'right'.
/r/MensRights28/04/20 09:05 AM
14

Yeah exactly! I think thats an incredibly important thing a lot of our members need to learn! I often see posts of people being pissed they got downvoted, when a lot of it had to do with their attitude. A good message with a shit attitude can still get downvoted to oblivion, ESPECIALLY if its about mens rights. Its just a double whammy to people, sadly.
/r/MensRights28/04/20 08:31 AM
47

Havent read the comments, so take what i say with a grain of salt, i just know its a common thing for a lot of our members to start debates at the wrong times and places. I agree with them, but the time and place is important or else people dont receive the information well. Personally id be pretty frustrated if i saw this post, and someone sudfenly started making it about women's issues. Its a conversation to be had, but not a conversation to be had on certain posts yknow. And a lot of the ways…
/r/MensRights28/04/20 08:00 AM
56

Ah yikes...i can kinda see why theyre downvoted since they brought unnecessary drama onto a joke post, but some of the comments replying to that... Yikes.
/r/MensRights28/04/20 07:42 AM
374

At least the sub agreed with him and downvoted the other idiot
/r/MensRights28/04/20 07:33 AM
9

Came here for the unjust way men are treated in the justice system and society in general, but i get this shit. This is the kind of shit that makes people not take mens rights seriously.
/r/MensRights20/04/20 08:56 PM
3

"discrimination at its finest" youd think the longer sentencing, increased arrests, lost custody battles, unfair child support, etc would be the finest of discrimination.... Not fining online sexual harassment.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 05:40 PM
66

Honestly i think alimony is unfair like 90% of the time, but funny how people only care when a woman has to pay alimony
/r/MensRights19/04/20 05:36 PM
8

Oh no thats totally fair, theres plenty of false claims, but that wasnt reallt what i was talking about. I just think no ones gonna like it when someones talking about something serious, and someone smugly comes by going "what about this person? You obviously dont care what this person did!" when you dont know these people at all. Dont get me wrong, men get falsely accused and womens actions get swept under the rug, both because of sexism. But i feel the way this was addressed and the place it w…
/r/MensRights18/04/20 06:18 PM
17

I get your point, but i think it was just not the time and place
/r/MensRights18/04/20 06:02 PM
2

Ah yikes yikes yikes
/r/PussyPassDenied09/04/20 09:33 PM
29

I only saw a bit of it so correct me if im wrong, but i definitely think its unfair to her specifically from what ive seen. But thats because i also think its unfair when it happens to men. Just really funny people only see how unfair these things are when they happen to women. Maybe... Just maybe... People will realise how ridiculously unfair this always is to men, now.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/04/20 08:29 PM
21

Thats probably the dumbest, most incel sounding argument i have ever had to read with my very own 2 eyes
/r/MensRights21/03/20 02:58 PM
5

Girls also like guys who use proper punctuation.
/r/MensRights29/05/19 05:03 PM
3

Jesus--what kinda mad man would make a law like that
/r/MensRights28/05/19 04:57 AM
2

Tbh I support the MGTOW community yet also don't? Their intend and reason is incredibly valid and I support them, but damn... The amount of incels trying to lump themselves in is annoying lmao. I guess it's more not supporting the toxic incels. But that's a decent principle. I wouldn't avoid cohabitation, but I really don't like marriage. Both are definitely understandable tho.
/r/MensRights26/05/19 11:37 PM
2

Ah... Gotcha. Seems more like a reason to avoid marriage rather than dating though, doesn't it? And... Avoid having kids. I mean, I'm avoiding kids and marriage already lmao
/r/MensRights26/05/19 11:26 PM
1

Divorce raped?
/r/MensRights26/05/19 09:09 PM
2

It's a bit frustrating to see everyone here claim that every shitty woman is a feminist... Is this shitty and trashy? Definitely. But she never claimed to be a feminist.
/r/MensRights25/05/19 10:54 PM
2

I mean... Absolute dick move, but don't see how that actually has anything to do with feminism or all women
/r/MensRights25/05/19 10:41 PM
4

That's not really fair, seeing as one speaks of proof and the other of conviction. A more fair comparison would be how many cases of rape are proven to be true and how many are proven to be false. Not all rapists are convicted, sadly.
/r/MensRights25/05/19 09:58 PM
1

I feel like it's better to do your own research rather than kinda ask other people to fight your battle.
/r/MensRights25/05/19 02:35 PM
-1

Tbh asking help for this just looks kinda silly. You can't disagree with something or try to debate something you can't even really debate yourself. Maybe that's just me.
/r/MensRights25/05/19 02:19 PM
15

Smh that's even worse
/r/PussyPassDenied20/05/19 06:37 AM
86

Damn I hope so
/r/PussyPassDenied20/05/19 06:33 AM
506

I hate them both for using "where"
/r/PussyPassDenied20/05/19 06:32 AM
5

Man: women should have the right to abortions Man: literally dies
/r/MensRights19/05/19 08:15 PM
1

Another creative insult!
/r/MensRights19/05/19 07:55 PM
1

It isn't killing. You can't kill what isn't really alive. It doesn't think, feel, etc. But that makes 4. Are you really this incapable of having a discussion without calling people retarded? At least come up with something new.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 07:48 PM
2

Going through this guy's post history for fun. I've been calmly discussing with this dude, he's called me retarded 3 times. But yeah, yall are the ones incapable of an honest and genuine discussion lmao. Edit: 4 times
/r/MensRights19/05/19 07:46 PM
0

You seem to care a lot more about a bunch of cells, rather than people with downs syndrome. I mean, you've called me ratarded 3 times already for merely disagreeing with you. Interesting. And fighting for rights for men and women IS fighting for equal rights. Plenty of women on here also fight for men's rights. It's not sacrificing anything. You're acting like a dude dies everything you support someone's rights.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 07:42 PM
3

That's not a right they would get. The parental rights exist, that isn't something they would gain from the abortion ban. Your children being born isn't really a legal entitlement, cause else a miscarriage would be considered manslaughter. Neither of these are rights that fathers would gain from the ban. I'm glad to be the one who can form proper arguments, and not the one who can barely have their argument stand on one leg and has to resort to name calling.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 07:40 PM
1

No, but I can at least discuss things without resulting to insults like a 5 year old. You didn't answer my question. Which rights would a father GAIN from this?
/r/MensRights19/05/19 07:36 PM
0

You see pretty bitter to be getting all riled up about people wanting to fight for equal rights. You're commenting all over the place. And yeah I'm gonna ignore the 'rights' of the bunch of cells that aren't even technically alive.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 07:35 PM
2

Okay, please do tell me which RIGHT father's would gain from this? An actual, legal entitlement they would gain?
/r/MensRights19/05/19 07:30 PM
3

It doesn't give men rights... It only benefits men who want to keep the baby. That isn't a right. The father will still have the same shitty rights as before. It benefits the man who wants to keep the child, but inconveniences the man who doesn't want kids. I don't see how you think that improves fathers rights.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 07:24 PM
1

You know you don't instantly poop out a baby, right? That baby still needs to be carried for 9 months. If the mother changes her mind about adoption, the guy is still fucked. It isn't "sacrifice men for women's rights" it's "fight for everyone's rights". It's either everyone's rights or none at all. You don't get to pick or choose with these. Men are definitely not gonna get their own rights improved regarding fatherhood when abortion is illegal. You can fight for both men's and women's rights. …
/r/MensRights19/05/19 07:20 PM
2

That doesn't assume there is no such thing as adoption. They'll still have to carry the kid and give birth to it. And the amount of kids in foster care would only increase. This would most definitely affect men as well. Before, there was still an option for discussion and abortion. Now there isn't. Now there will DEFINITELY be an unwanted kid. It only benefits the men who want kids.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 03:41 PM
21

I can understand your point, ofcourse, but taking one person's rights away isn't gonna help anything. If anything, fighting for BOTH groups rights now would probably work a lot better than refusing to fight for their rights. Plus, the abortion law also highly affects men. Now there is literally no way out for ANYONE in the situation. So now if a couple didn't want kids, they're having them anyway. The guy AND girl will be paying the price. It doesn't help at all.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 02:19 PM
16

Wouldn't it be nicer if BOTH parents had to put a certain base amount of money into a conjoined bank account or something? Then they can both see where it goes for the most part. Ofcourse there's small extra payments left and right, they're parents, but the bigger amounts would most likely be spent properly?
/r/MensRights19/05/19 02:17 PM
32

Man I wish there was a mom test. Maybe we wouldn't have soany idiots and abusive people as mothers then. (same for dad's though)
/r/MensRights19/05/19 08:14 AM
1

It's not originally a meme as far as I'm concerned. There's a lot more to this conversation.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 08:31 PM
2

A lot of people who criticize stuff like publically talking about periods (in detail, not just mentioning it) usually ARE women as well. Good luck tho yall. I'm gay sooo
/r/MensRights17/05/19 05:25 PM
3

I assault men on purpose I've assaulted about 50 men hehe :)
/r/MensRights14/05/19 07:12 AM
2

.. No one? Since if one half was female, then the other was male. So they're both to blame.
/r/MensRights12/05/19 09:03 PM
2

Why blame women if they're responsible for half? Isn't the other half... Men? I'm confused here
/r/MensRights12/05/19 08:48 PM
4

Today I learned
/r/MensRights12/05/19 08:47 PM
2

TIL
/r/MensRights12/05/19 08:45 PM
12

Wait, can you grow foreskin back?
/r/MensRights12/05/19 08:36 PM
4

Please do show me an example of men using women for money and it being called violence. I'll wait. This isn't equality. This is you being an idiot and using the wrong terminology and then acting like a literal child. "but they did it too!!!" doesn't mean shit. You're trying to convince people to be for men's rights, and I've always been hardcore for men's rights but it's post alike these and ignorance like yours that makes me wanna walk out on it. You're not helping anyone but those who oppose y…
/r/MensRights12/05/19 11:46 AM
6

Dude... No... Violence: behaviour involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something. This LITERALLY isn't domestic violence.
/r/MensRights12/05/19 10:18 AM
11

This isn't violence. Its abuse. And you probably shouldn't represent serious issues with stolen anime boy art.
/r/MensRights12/05/19 09:34 AM
2

It happens lmao
/r/MensRights11/05/19 09:02 PM
2

Idk man your comment seemed a little uncalled for
/r/MensRights11/05/19 05:36 PM
3

I mean, in theory it sounds like a decent idea. Less childhood pregnancies!!! But then you start thinking about the individuals, the downsides to a reversed vasectomy surgery, the surgeries you'd be performing on possibly children, and the bodily modifications all based on sexism. Then it doesn't sound so great anymore. The theory without any thought sounds like a sperm on and off switch, which would be pretty neat. But this ain't it.
/r/MensRights10/05/19 09:48 PM
1

I meant that having sex with your students is still bad even if it isn't called pedophilia... Geez
/r/MensRights10/05/19 04:02 PM
1

In most countries its illegal for someone older to have sex with someone of the age of 16. 16 is then considered the age of consent between consenting young people and 18 is the age of consent for any age. On top of that, it still makes it equally as bad to have sex with students.
/r/MensRights10/05/19 05:03 AM
9

Technically it isn't pedophilia! But hebephilia or ephebophilia! Equally as bad, though.
/r/MensRights09/05/19 07:30 PM
23

This isn't pussy pass denied. This is just as bad as if a woman did that to a guy.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/05/19 06:35 PM
1

No offense but how many times are people gonna post this
/r/MensRights08/05/19 05:52 PM
3

So not only did she not work, she didn't even do house work and now wants to be paid for 20 years for no reason? Cool
/r/MensRights08/05/19 05:01 AM
7

Yeah exactly. And for some reason my comment pointing out that a mom isn't the same as a nanny got down voted? A nanny doesnt ask to be paid to watch her own kids lmao
/r/MensRights07/05/19 10:24 PM
8

I said she doesn't deserve anything and got heavily down voted so idk
/r/MensRights07/05/19 10:16 PM
52

Yes hi I'd like to uh return my mother
/r/MensRights07/05/19 10:15 PM
57

She cheated and yet people expect him to pay for her lifestyle for TWENTY YEARS. Someone even said its to compensate for raising the kids... HER KIDS. They compared it to a nanny getting paid. But this isn't a fucking nanny it's their mother. He worked long ass hours to keep those kids literally alive. To keep her alive.
/r/MensRights07/05/19 05:33 PM
832

S.. She didn't even do shit herself. She's boring.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/19 06:01 AM
5

As a gay man, I am royally scared
/r/MensRights06/05/19 09:37 PM
56

That's adorable
/r/MensRights06/05/19 07:29 PM
2

Yeah feminism is fucked, but she was right. It Should actually be about equal rights, but the epeople ruin it. I prefer egalitarian.
/r/MensRights06/05/19 11:10 AM
1

Not all men need to be physically strong.
/r/MensRights06/05/19 06:38 AM
2

I know that, but she didn't say that people today aren't doing that though. I know full well that feminism today is fucked, but that was their point.
/r/MensRights06/05/19 06:33 AM
4

Haha you're a disgusting excuse for a human being
/r/PussyPassDenied06/05/19 06:31 AM
18

This isn't how you deny a pussy pass. This is how you ruin two people's lives. Both equally disgusting people.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/05/19 10:32 PM
21

Hi! That's fucking disgusting!
/r/PussyPassDenied05/05/19 10:29 PM
0

Not sure why you're getting down voted? You're right.
/r/MensRights05/05/19 09:40 PM
11

Or maybe both are good men?
/r/MensRights05/05/19 08:16 PM
9

Ouch... Sorry dude
/r/MensRights05/05/19 07:29 PM
22

I mean, they're just raping your bank account for the next 18 years while calling you a deadbeat
/r/MensRights05/05/19 06:12 PM
3

Who the fuck could even get her down in the first place
/r/PussyPassDenied05/05/19 05:40 PM
5

Who let the crazy loose
/r/MensRights01/05/19 12:21 AM
-1

I dunno man. People are fairly open about sexual exploration on both ends. You're just assuming stuff here and that's not what this sub is for. Edit: I also wanna add that male and female sex toys are vastly different. Women tend to need them more. However, yeah a lot of young dudes use some weird shit to masturbate so I'd also rather buy either one of them a toy rather than have one humping my cushions and the other getting UTIs from my fresh cucumbers.
/r/MensRights30/04/19 11:29 PM
5

I don't think this really belongs here- Besides. It should be ESH. She's a bit too young for that, but it should've been discussed instead. This is how you create scared and prude children.
/r/MensRights30/04/19 11:21 PM
1

I don't really have any advice, but wouldn't this be some kid of child abuse?
/r/MensRights24/04/19 08:27 AM
3

Lmao exactly. I'm not telling people to shave or anything but you should be allowed to express that opinion.
/r/MensRights23/04/19 11:55 AM
9

That's quite literally what I'm doing lmao
/r/MensRights23/04/19 05:00 AM
16

I mean, I'm gay and I don't even like bodily hair on men. It's not all that much of a sexist issue for me, bodily hair is just pretty unattractive.
/r/MensRights22/04/19 09:20 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter