TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

thatjessiecat Archive

View 0 posts and 18 comments by thatjessiecat on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Don't you mean "asshole shield"?
/r/seduction16/08/12 06:55 PM
1

*heed
/r/seduction16/08/12 11:15 AM
19

When she got up and got dressed like that it was because she wanted to leave. Lack of affection says to me that she didn't want you tagging along behind her. She wanted to be alone and you weren't reading the signals.
/r/seduction16/08/12 11:14 AM
1

Ok, I understand. But again, I don't think you should be pressuring people. There is not "always" that resistance. When women want to have sex, they want to have sex.
/r/seduction18/07/12 07:18 AM
1

Almost no resistance? Any resistance means you're having nonconsensual sex, which is wrong. Illegal actually. You should not be doing that.
/r/seduction17/07/12 07:00 PM
1

sure, but "plausible" and "makes sense" and "I think" are totally different statements from "there are studies that show". And if alpha male = physically desirable, then sure, it's way more plausible that a study using sexually attractive men was carried out. But that's not what I was objecting to. What I was really objecting to was the use of the term "alpha male" in a scientific/objectively definable sense. Anyway, if you can't link to the studies then this is a bit pointless, since what I am …
/r/seduction17/07/12 06:54 PM
1

I just can't believe this was ever studied in an experiment. And did they put out an advert for alpha males needed to participate? It's completely implausible. ETA: a video of a vagina during orgasm is not going to convince me. The claim was that "women come harder, faster and easier with alpha males and have more simultaneous orgasms with alpha males" and that this has been shown in studies. In order to verify this claim, we need to see the studies. There need to be numbers.
/r/seduction17/07/12 06:09 AM
1

no actual studies then?
/r/seduction16/07/12 09:24 PM
0

For what it's worth, my guess is that so many men are selfish lovers that just giving oral will make you stand out and therefore seem like relationship material. But I don't want to advise you not to go down on women or not to pay attention to what they like. What you could change is the dating and hanging out part: if it's just about sex then make it just about sex. Show up, fuck, and leave. Make texts purely sexual or logistic, to arrange meeting up. Don't see her too often. And like someone e…
/r/seduction16/07/12 07:57 AM
1

what studies? How do you even test that someone is an alpha male for the purposes of an experiment? Wtf is an alpha male anyway, aside from something you all wish you could be? We're not gorillas.
/r/seduction16/07/12 07:51 AM
1

I'm sorry, we must be working with different definitions of shallow here. I thought it meant judging people and things based on appearance or material worth. I don't understand how it applies here. And what would you do, if someone passed you her phone but you didn't want to give her your number? There are only a few ways out of that, and avoidance is one of them. For some of the tactics I've seen proposed in r/seduction, it's probably the least troublesome once a girl finds herself in that situ…
/r/seduction06/07/12 06:35 AM
4

it just means she doesn't want to give out her number. That's not even being shallow. You don't know why she didn't, but she didn't. And yes, it's ok for a girl not to want to give out her number.
/r/seduction05/07/12 07:17 PM
2

Because there are women who can read and use the internet?
/r/seduction05/07/12 06:29 PM
7

Yes, because nothing about the men in this thread is shallow.
/r/seduction05/07/12 02:22 PM
-4

hahahaha. Delusion is.
/r/seduction05/07/12 02:05 PM
7

That just sounds manipulative and creepy.
/r/seduction22/02/12 09:53 AM
1

Well, for what it's worth, I don't see those lines working on anyone. Who's going to go home with someone they just met who uses cheesy line after cheesy line? I think these women could see right through you. Try getting to know someone if you actually want to get laid.
/r/seduction20/02/12 02:08 AM
1

Some lessons: engage, not engadge; should/could HAVE not of.
/r/seduction20/02/12 01:56 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter