TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

thatlowdowndirty47 Archive

View 4 posts and 185 comments by thatlowdowndirty47 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

They were gold. hordes of his friends and strangers came out in support for him, but of course, the accuser doubled down and said he was lying so a lot of her friends came to the tunes of "you're a disgusting human being" / "kill yourself". pretty much what you'd expect.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/03/16 11:28 PM
84

Just an update: So after the accused posted his evidence against the accuser on Facebook, it went viral with something like 30k+ shares. After this, the accused received some push back and threats from people as the accuser doubled down and stated that he was in fact lying. She was able to conjure up outrage on her behalf, of course, and Facebook deleted his post citing it "breached community guidelines". Since then, the accused is considering pressing charges at the moment, and has since repost…
/r/PussyPassDenied20/03/16 11:19 PM
1

Exactly! Thank you, and this is what he's sorely missing in his conquest to spin. He's an obvious troll.
/r/MensRights20/03/16 10:04 PM
1

/u/geniice is a troll, and your reply is the proper way to squash a troll.
/r/MensRights20/03/16 03:42 PM
6

Already did. You refused it on a faulty basis of "it was dealing with television". You're attempting to contextualize it in a favorable situation for yourself so you can continuous fall back on that basis. The evidence has been shown, you can chose to take it or not, but realize, you are not correct. I'd love to see Trey Songz pull down a chick's blouse and sing to her everlasting, but Trey Songz isn't dumb. He knows they'll be a shit storm. Ooo, how I'd love for Drake to tug on Nicki Minaj's un…
/r/MensRights20/03/16 03:30 PM
8

Do those include artist calling fan to stage and physically tearing off an article of clothing? What about the amount of shit Robin Thicke and Miley Cyrus got for her just grinding on him during a performance? Cmon, there's a blatant double standard here and you know.
/r/MensRights20/03/16 03:01 PM
2

You keep saying we didn't get the whole story, i think you're wrong. The story is right there in the video. A male being invalidated by a WHITE female SJW on the bases of his white skin(race) and his maleness(gender). Identity Politics deployed. You sir, have missed the point of the entire video and this entire thread, and thus, you keep spinning lol.
/r/MensRights20/03/16 02:33 PM
2

I think you're the only idiot here, honestly. You've been spinning the same thing throughout this thread, and it honestly makes no sense lol.
/r/MensRights20/03/16 02:29 PM
2

Well, you're provoking me now, am I allowed to insult you purely on the basis of your skin color and sex? This is what you're missing in all of your spinning to reserve a neutral position. This video perfectly demonstrates identity politics wherein your arguments are invalidated because of certain aspects of your identity whether it race or gender.
/r/MensRights20/03/16 02:28 PM
1

Feminist thought process.
/r/MensRights20/03/16 02:21 PM
1

of course he does, why do you think these people think that it's unequivocally ok to react like this to a person? They always think they're punching up.
/r/MensRights20/03/16 02:19 PM
1

Love this reply.
/r/MensRights20/03/16 02:17 PM
1

This is why you'll always get pushed back. You're forcing your way of thinking on people. We believe in equality, and that does NOT make us feminist.
/r/MensRights20/03/16 02:11 PM
1

Unfortunately, you have no sense of nuance and application. Which is why your still stuck reciting a definition.
/r/MensRights20/03/16 02:03 PM
1

Then you sir, aren't a feminist. There are feminist organizations that are actively advocating against holding a woman to standard of a man when it comes to violence. Hell, there's even feminist organizations lobbying to have women prisons disbanded entirely. Are these things you support? Because you say you are a feminist, and there are feminist actively advocating against points you just stated.
/r/MensRights20/03/16 02:01 PM
2

Lmao. So you're just going to label them with out their consent? Do you know if they personally identify as such and identified with thoughts and theories of feminism? Oh, you do? Can you provide a link? Otherwise, i believe in feminist doctrine, forcing something upon one without that one's consent is rape. You my friend, may be a rapist.
/r/MensRights20/03/16 01:58 PM
1

Lmao Now it's women wanting equality. Dude, shut up. First it was a definite "ITS EQUALITY, YOU SHOULD BE A FEMINIST" It's like you're an automated response system for feminism. You got all the same answers lol.
/r/MensRights20/03/16 01:55 PM
1

Lmao. Yeah, you're definitely a feminist. Nice straw man there. Please notify me when you actually find where i said "Women shouldn't have the right to vote". Until then, i don't have time for your drivel. Especially after your remarks. "WW2 would have gone very differently if there weren't women keeping everything running". Your bias is showing extremely. Even if this statement was accurate, without men going to the battle field and dying and earning their rights as citizens, there would've bee…
/r/MensRights20/03/16 01:52 PM
1

Dude, you can say that hundred times in your bathroom mirror with the lights shut off, it still wouldn't be true. You don't believe in equality, you believe in a label. Stop it. I can certainly be an egalitarian and NOT be a feminist. I can vigorously work towards and want equality, and still NOT be a feminist. Feminist holds no monopoly over equality, and is literally night and day in comparison. So no, I believe in equal rights, and i adamantly renounce anything feminist; it's school of though…
/r/MensRights20/03/16 01:46 PM
1

You're still hiding behind a definition? Man are you really disingenuous. We're talking in application here, and IN APPLICATION, your label is not equality, and you certainly can't prove otherwise, or you would've in this thread.
/r/MensRights20/03/16 01:36 PM
2

You're not looking for unity. You're trying to co-op us into your way of viewing things. This is why you're receiving push back, because they're are arguments, sound ones i might add, that rips apart how you view things like equality and feminism.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 02:17 PM
8

How dare you compare women marching in the comforts of their country for a right to men dying in wars meant to protect said women, for that very same right? Your bias is showing and it's totally disrespectful.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 02:15 PM
2

Feminism gave white women the vote. It didn't get ALL women the vote. Stop misrepresenting. Minority women got their right to vote through the civil rights movement. Asian American women got the right to vote through international outcry from foreign allies during WWII
/r/MensRights19/03/16 02:12 PM
1

i fucks with your opinion. Not because of the content, but because you give no fucks having it.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 02:07 PM
2

Because you decided to associate yourself with a label that you yourself knows carries a lot of stigma. So don't be surprised when you're "victimize"(apparently discourse and critique of labels is now "victimizing").
/r/MensRights19/03/16 02:01 PM
1

It doesn't matter. IT WAS A BREACH OF PRIVACY(that's verifiable damages), and then when they were order to take it down, they refused.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 01:54 PM
2

I'd be incline to agree with you if a blatant double standard didn't exist. While you may maintain consistency when it comes to your standards, I.E: you'd be saying the same thing if Hogan was a woman in the same situation, society doesn't. If you leveled what you are saying to a woman that happened to be in the same situation, no doubt you'd be called out for victim blaming.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 01:51 PM
2

pm me it when you do.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 12:42 PM
0

take this up vote since you're getting down voted for stating facts.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 10:54 PM
-1

link??
/r/MensRights14/03/16 10:39 PM
2

This argument is as disingenuous as the "child's well being" argument. The reality is, if men are extended reproductive rights, it will in turn bring down the single mother stat since males wielding reproductive rights will act as a deterrent. With more women understanding that daddy can opt out of his responsibilities, more women will be deterred to bring to term since the option of cashing out on CS and having daddy by the balls for 18 years will no longer be available.
/r/MensRights14/03/16 12:31 PM
2

Lol, and I bet you think there's nothing stupid about you in general. You'd be wrong.
/r/MensRights13/03/16 10:25 PM
2

Get this idiot the noble prize, he just solved the universe. /s
/r/MensRights13/03/16 03:01 PM
2

Or why America sucks in general
/r/MensRights13/03/16 02:07 PM
1

Yes, yes. Link to data if you have it.
/r/MensRights12/03/16 04:10 PM
2

I agree. There is a lot of truth in the notion "women do not favor "nice guys" romantically or sexually" or "nice guys finish last". This can actually be demonstrated. "Where have all the men gone" is nothing more than a whine at the realization that the biological clock is ticking. It's a crutch for women to once again avoid responsibility. Whether it be their high and ridiculous standards or just overall unpleasantness when trying to enforce these standards, it's all a mere mechanism to absolv…
/r/MensRights12/03/16 02:57 PM
2

It doesn't get a ton of attention, as evident as you rushing here to this post just so you can go "see, the public does pay lip service to male DV" without even realizing that this was mainly for boys.
/r/MensRights12/03/16 02:35 PM
1

How about this, if you're having a tough time attracting women to the field, how about switching from an obviously flawed method, to the method of trying to attract people with...iunno'..merit, maybe? I think that's the problem majority of people in this comment section have with this in addition to it discriminating against the very people who are the majority and driving force of this field..
/r/MensRights11/03/16 12:26 PM
4

Why is "you shouldn't stare" a thing? Why is it okay to liberate female sexuality and the expression of that, but constantly give guidelines to male sexuality and it's expression? If women nowadays can sleep around and not be called sluts, i'd like to stare at cleavage without the fear of being called a creep.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 12:24 PM
2

I hear ya man, and often, a helpless feeling sorta' accompanies this feeling. It sucks, but, maybe changing some of the people in your life will help. I found that to really help. Especially if you have some cool women for friends who are unapologetically women and not only understands and empathizes with male issues/struggle, but actively seek to remedy it with their attitudes. It's good to have these type of people because I realize afar a stint of browsing through here, i'm ready for some dis…
/r/MensRights08/03/16 11:45 PM
6

He wouldn't even be in that situation if a false accusation wasn't leveled.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 11:17 PM
7

Got to know better than to bring debate to an echo chamber. Sorry, man. =[
/r/MensRights08/03/16 01:00 PM
1

Is there a source for that? I'd like it for my personal collection
/r/MensRights05/03/16 04:07 PM
1

Here's a interesting link on that: http://offsettingbehaviour.blogspot.co.nz/2010/12/lesbian-pay-gap.html
/r/MensRights05/03/16 04:06 PM
0

shit, moving to the UK.
/r/MensRights05/03/16 02:27 PM
3

Woah, i'm a little interested in where this question would lead to
/r/MensRights05/03/16 12:15 AM
1

But one can argue that feminist backed social policies allows for an environment where woman can falsely accuse men of rape. Would you then call that feminism? I get what you're try to do, but the way you're packaging it is to SJWish for me. The fact of the matter is, if you advocating, discussing, debating men's issues, it should always be expected that you will eventually become critical of feminism. Especially with the monopoly it holds on the discourse.
/r/MensRights03/03/16 01:54 PM
2

Come on. Let's not act like she got off because of insanity. It's obvious she got off because she's a mother. because she's a woman. Look at the excuses being pedaled in the comment section and even here. There'd be no sympathy for a man who was in this type of situation. You guys are trying to hard to be cool.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 01:49 PM
4

So, you're sitting here, excusing the mother of taking 3 LIVES, but won't shed an ounce of sympathy for a person who was molested as a child and then committed all he knows on another person? You sure your bias isn't showing?
/r/MensRights29/02/16 01:47 PM
1

Why do responses like this always follow the same sort of theme? Where there's a HUGE appeal to emotions by framing the situation spoken about in OP post in the context of a "friend in need". Like, this goes without saying. Any human would offer assistance to a friend who came and told them something horrible had happened to them. It's common sense. What we're talking about here is the shit storm that is activated after a mere ACCUSATION.
/r/MensRights28/02/16 02:15 PM
1

lmao. i know the girl.
/r/MensRights28/02/16 12:03 AM
1

Why is that discouraging? Why is it discouraging to lose to the more innovative and forward idea? Unless your implying they should be discouraged because they lost to a boy, to which i raise you a "you're sexist", ha. Yeah, the competition was advertised to draw more girls to field, so what? Was the competition advertised as a guarantee win for a girl? Like, come on, the quote is ridiculous. Their stated aim was to get more girls drawn to the field, which they've accomplished Anything more than …
/r/MensRights27/02/16 04:41 PM
2

Actually, yes. I'd think public group sex is more probable than a public gang rape. Why this is surprising? I know chicks who pay for much more intricate sex fantasies. So yes, your bias is showing.
/r/MensRights27/02/16 01:00 PM
1

all good man, i'm doing the exact same thing at this moment. just got home from work, baked, ready to eat, ha. just pm me it if you ever find it.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 07:18 PM
2

did you ever happen to find that source after your shift?
/r/MensRights26/02/16 12:56 PM
4

Take your L, Click. Nothing you can do now will repair what you've done and your cheap attempt to deflect the blame, much to no one surprises, is the icing on the cake. watching you squirm to grab any control of this situation is comical.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 12:38 PM
11

My only complaint is it wasn't hasty enough
/r/MensRights25/02/16 10:08 PM
-11

Well, good for you! Here's a cookie.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 12:27 PM
-5

Why care? Why does this bug you so much? For years the pendulum swung one way, and now, it's swinging to other. Let it happen.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 12:20 PM
25

Well till that changes, we'll keep the standard consistent.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 12:01 PM
1

She swore under oath that he didn't drug her. Is that good enough for you? Will you give up your battle on semantics now? Geez.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 12:46 PM
4

.....I mean...what do you call a person who lies under oath...? a liar..perhaps?
/r/MensRights21/02/16 01:41 PM
3

I am not exactly convinced that Cosby is innocent, considering how he has had prescriptions for downers, and that he has supplied the drugs to women, though he claims they ingested the drugs "consensually." That sounds fishy as shit to me. Shouldn't sound fishy at all if you understand the time they lived in. Downers were the thing back in the 70s, and people constantly partied with them and even popped ludes for better sexual experiences or to balance out a coke high. it's how people party back…
/r/MensRights20/02/16 02:07 PM
7

Wow, they're already suspending people who disagree with them?
/r/MensRights16/02/16 10:59 PM
5

They never do lol.
/r/MensRights14/02/16 11:27 PM
5

Feminism, dude. Did you not know that it's white women's ticket to the oppression table?
/r/MensRights14/02/16 11:16 PM
1

As per usual when it comes to this whole exchange.
/r/MensRights14/02/16 03:54 PM
5

Dude, you never have proof or sources. Just hyperbole. and every time you come in here with that drivel, we knock that shit back. You're not trying to have genuine discourse. You cherry pick instances that prove your notions while ignoring and ultimately deflecting actual evidence that the ideology of feminism has harmed men and boys. And when we keep trying to show you that, you cleverly derail by saying "MRAs blame women for everything here!". Since when feminist means women.
/r/MensRights14/02/16 01:32 PM
1

You ain't prove shit, you fucking daft child. All you did was spam me all day with replies, not even comprehending what the hell i said in my first post. You're beating yourself off a little much there, relax. You never had a point to prove.
/r/MensRights14/02/16 12:59 PM
1

Lol. You can keep reaching, fellow. My original comment is still up there if you'd ever like to take a gander and perhaps test your comprehension skills. Till' then, have fun continuously reaching against the straw man you've created. Enjoy.
/r/MensRights13/02/16 04:58 PM
2

Lol. Keep reaching dude. My original comment is right there for all of reddit to see. so you're accusation slides right off me, my friend. Annnnd the mental gymnastics to avoid the original point of my comment continues. Man, lack of reading comprehension is strong with this one.
/r/MensRights13/02/16 04:19 PM
2

Yeah, keeeep on repeating that as if i stated it, and continue to ignore the point of my original reply. The mental gymnastics continue.
/r/MensRights13/02/16 03:06 PM
2

Wow, the mental gymnastics you had to do to avoid recognizing the point of my reply is astonishing.
/r/MensRights13/02/16 02:43 PM
2

I honestly think the question should always be "What type of woman was oppressed historically'. I, for one, honestly believe that western white women have never had to deal with any form of oppression and/or marginalization. Minority women? Of course, now the following question to that would be were those women oppressed because of their gender or other components? And I think that's a valid question. To be honest, no one benefits the mosts from the "Historically, women were oppressed" meme than…
/r/MensRights13/02/16 01:02 PM
2

u maaaad. ganna send my patriarchal assistanct over to rape you. he's one rape away from being an overlord.
/r/MensRights13/02/16 12:32 PM
5

I just have one question for you. How come i never see posters like this that says DV is women's responsibilities? If what you say is true, and what they are saying is genuine, shouldn't we see more flyers/ads that say the same thing about women? That's because they're not being genuine. They don't use "he" v "she" for simplicity, they use it to further perpetuate the dynamic. You think people are going to get that men make up half of DV victims with this type of constant perpetuation of male pe…
/r/MensRights13/02/16 12:30 PM
1

Of course you do. Go get fitted for your penis lock immediately.
/r/MensRights13/02/16 12:15 PM
4

Testosterone is needed for violence as much as oxygen is needed to commit the crime of theft. The notion that men are more violent because of testosterone is incorrect. It's actually after the violence and/or risk taking is when a male sees an increase in testosterone.
/r/MensRights10/02/16 10:17 PM
1

The argument is, since mothers have all of these options available to them to terminate their responsibilities to a child born to them, we'd like some options for fathers; including the option to terminate ALL responsibilities to the mother and child if the father does not want the child. In other words, parental surrender for men. AKA, the same options afforded to you as a woman. It's not that hard to figure it out, OP states it right in his post. but men should have equal rights to terminate r…
/r/MensRights10/02/16 01:41 PM
0

While I can totally agree with what you've said; i live in reality. and the reality is that men, since the dawn of time, are forced to do things with their body for the "greater good" or the "greater benefit". Usually to act as a meat shield for society(aka women and children). Societies literally stand on the bodies of men, yet all i hear about when it comes to the topic of parental rights is that we should be cautious not to put women's bodies through too much. Like what? Women already have al…
/r/MensRights09/02/16 11:01 PM
1

Oh! New tactic. Imply something i didn't say and pass it off like I said it! Woah, innovative. Move it along, child. You're further making yourself look like a dunce by trying to imply that i think women suck and wonder why they don't love me when literally not even two comments ago, you tried to shame me for the exact thing thinking i deployed such a tactic. You're a fail of a life.
/r/MensRights09/02/16 01:50 PM
1

Yet you keep on returning to reply to me. Are you a woman? Cause you sure like getting the last word in. Run along, child. Your assertion holds no merit.
/r/MensRights09/02/16 01:44 PM
1

And you felt the need to bring your ill-informed opinion here. So we're even. Be a little more cautious where you park that drivel you call an opinion; intelligent people are at work with discourse.
/r/MensRights09/02/16 01:17 PM
3

Don't belong to a movement. Not really into collectivism or hive mentality. I like to derive my views my self while simultaneously aspiring to continue to be a person who's willing to look at said views and revise them. But thanks for the kind words.
/r/MensRights09/02/16 12:48 PM
2

Hey! Don't mention it! Hopefully you'll work hard to reform yourself and your movement. Good luck to you.
/r/MensRights09/02/16 12:38 PM
1

Don't you get it? The user is responding in this manner because they DO NOT want to concede. The user does not want to accept the fact that the radicals in it's movement are the driving force of said movement.
/r/MensRights09/02/16 12:37 PM
2

Dude, why even bother? /u/ThePointyBird is a classic example of the armchair feminist. These are the feminist who will do anything to deflect the responsibility of their radicals. Even when said radicals have more influence in feminism than said armchair feminist. It's really interesting stuff.
/r/MensRights09/02/16 12:33 PM
-3

But why is this an argument? "putting woman's body through so much". Why is this argument? That is their function. That is their responsibility to humanity. Just like men have responsibilities to humanity that's also "putting men's bodies through so much".
/r/MensRights09/02/16 12:07 PM
1

Not necessary, and I'm sure you'd weirdly get off on that; so i'll pass. Just wanted to make sure that you UNDERSTAND that you, and your life, are a waste of space. Thanks for reading.
/r/MensRights09/02/16 11:55 AM
2

If I had to guess, your miserable life.
/r/MensRights08/02/16 12:51 PM
2

Lol. u mad.
/r/MensRights08/02/16 11:35 AM
3

How about your theory of "de facto" rights? You can't find a legal right that women don't have and that men do, so you created this ridiculous thing called de facto rights, which is basically social engineering parading around as equality. In other words, another way for feminism to deflect the notion that women aren't actually or even legally oppressed.
/r/MensRights07/02/16 10:59 PM
5

Reading through this thread has made realize the ever elusive and highly spoken about "moderate feminist" in fact does not exist. All of them hold the most ridiculous views and are incapable of having a discourse where their views may need to be looked at and revised.
/r/MensRights07/02/16 03:56 PM
2

This is a very good question. I'm interested in if she'll answer this.
/r/MensRights07/02/16 03:46 PM
-2

Exactly, and i hear that constantly from women now that requiring them to sign up is now on the table. Convenient isn't it?
/r/MensRights07/02/16 01:36 PM
6

Wait, so do you believe that men do face systematic sexism?
/r/MensRights07/02/16 01:01 PM
5

But then again, that's not what happened in this case is it? He gave sufficient identification and the police was still called. Sure, there's a problem with a school giving a child to a random unknown person who CLAIMS to be a child's relative. but there's even more of a problem when a school doesn't release a child to a relative that has proven that they are a relative and have permission to pick said child up.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 04:04 PM
6

Shut up. No one asked you to plant your misinformed opinion here. He's not stating he needs to play a bigger role, he's stating that if and when the time comes where he has to play a bigger role in his niece's life, he's not looking forward to the implied pedophile man stuff he'll surely have to deal with because of the lies his sister told his niece while she was young.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 03:39 PM
3

I have to disagree here, sorry. I don't think she meant or even implied that. What I think she was implying was that being apart of the establishment and being a woman, are two mutually exclusive things. In other words, she was using her vagina for a cheap pop out of the audience. No worries, though. i like you're description far better than what he was implying.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 02:41 PM
1

Exactly, and this is what users like /u/fullhalf just simply can't grasp. They can't grasp how self centered and narcissistic their thinking is. Saying she's completely right and there doesn't need to be a study to "tell you if it actually happens or if you experience it every day" is basically saying, "Hey lets take this women's experiences and extrapolate it to all women! even though there's a gigantic pile of evidence telling me otherwise! i won't let that evidence invalidate my experience. i…
/r/MensRights06/02/16 02:22 PM
4

"There are no bad tactics...only bad targets....ie..women"
/r/MensRights03/02/16 10:53 PM
1

I believe, if anyone has an argument when it comes to objectification, it is men; as they are the ones who deal with the unique act of being objectified as tools of wars and subsequently dispose in a manner not worthy of a dog.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 10:39 PM
5

You got to love how self centered feminism has made women.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 01:04 PM
9

No, i've definitely seen this type of feminist before, and they're the worst. These are your "feminism helps men too!" moderates. These are the ones who come into conversations that are(rightfully) critical of feminism to bring in the few isolated events where feminism helps men (usually as a byproduct of something greater attained for women). They list their isolated events and point emphatically like "see, feminism DOES help men", but then you list all the instances of feminist discrimination …
/r/MensRights02/02/16 12:57 PM
7

I love how you're so adamantly ignoring his points and then continuously trying to frame feminism back in the light you deem favorable. This is not discourse. You're not acknowledging any of the points he has listed showing you that feminism actively discriminates against men and doesn't help them at all, yet you want him to accept the isolated events you listed here as proof that feminism helps men. Also, this person thinks alimony helps men. You're just as worst as the radicals.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 12:46 PM
3

Thank god.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 11:15 PM
7

Shaming. By far the one that annoys me the most. It's incredible to me that we have movements like "stop fat shaming" or "stop slut shaming". You think society would ever allow a "stop deadbeat shaming"? Hell no. Because movements that advocate for agency is apparently only for women. This one hits home more because it so emphatically points to feminism's legacy of doing everything it can to liberate the female gender role while simultaneously doing everything it can to keep the male gender role…
/r/MensRights01/02/16 11:06 PM
4

First of all, that study is archaic. Second, your statement displays your misunderstanding of how professions work. "I'm saying if there's a law firm and women lawyers are given a lower salary than men lawyers than that is an abject problem for women to fight for". No it's not, maybe first try figuring out why this is occurring? Is it because there are more males who have made partner? is it because there are more males working 60-65 hr weeks? Is it because female lawyers leave the workforce aft…
/r/MensRights01/02/16 10:39 PM
6

You gotta love how the idiot girl spouts some idiot shit, and then gets checked for it, and then thinks that it is now a convenient time to play victim by saying "wow and i'm being mean? you're the one using misogynistic and offensive terms". You honestly have to have talent to blatantly ignore the misandry in "women are more necessary for this thing called reproduction and less likely to be stupid enough to do those things".
/r/MensRights01/02/16 01:52 PM
1

Do you have a source on that?
/r/MensRights01/02/16 01:42 PM
1

Wait, you wouldn't vote for trump if it was Trump vs Hilary? Hell, i detest trump as much as the next guy, but if it falls between them, i'm definitely pulling for Trump, and not the Lizard Queen.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 01:42 PM
1

Really would like to hear some thoughts about this video.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 01:36 PM
1

Feminist obsession with abortion has to do with control. In their mind, they view the child/fetus as property, thus making it their right to discard it whenever they want.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 01:30 PM
11

Never put yourself in that position. When you stopped, you ultimately gave that women power to harass you and fuck your day up. You obeyed all of this woman's commands like she was your mother and that's where you fucked up. This happens to all men. I used to do my calisthenics in a playground nearby my apartment, a playground i had the pleasure of growing up in and near. I was forcibly removed from said playground because of my genitalia by some Nannies who were hired by gentrifiers.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 12:44 PM
12

Definitely. I just find the parallels of the friend zone and emotional labor interesting. To me, it just further shows that women today(yes, i said women. i see these attitudes prevalent amongst women who don't even identify as feminist) have this weird I want my cake and I want to eat it to mentality coupled with a rabid need to control male behavior.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 11:20 PM
5

Lol, i second that. Seeing you all over the place today skee.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 11:14 PM
22

I think this is the quickest the Guardian has ever reported on a false rape claim. Of course, how convenient it comes at a time where the consequential effects will render them off the hook. Bravo, feminist. Edit: Was there the obligatory "this teenage girl is still a victim" in this article?
/r/MensRights31/01/16 06:41 PM
220

Emotional Labor can be paralleled by the friend zone. It's really interesting, honestly. Feminist come down hard on the friend zone and men who speak of it. They usually say things like "just because you were nice to me, you're entitled to my body?", when they actually mean "just because i used you for emotional support because the guy i'm actually into won't do it, you're entitled to my time?". So now, when a women brings up "emotional labor", just say, "so because you gave me emotional support…
/r/MensRights31/01/16 04:39 PM
5

Really? For some haircuts? Wear a condom fellas.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 03:47 PM
-5

I agree, definitely inappropriate, but how do you suggest we make the point of this ridiculous relationship? How do you suggest we bring light to the fact that feminist are fighting a false rape culture and patriarchy in the west, while those very things exist in the ideas of Islam.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 03:36 PM
7

Jesus Christ. Hilary can't win on her merit so she's trying to illicit the attitudes of yesteryear.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 01:46 PM
2

Yeah, this entire case was a clever use of words by the media. Playing on current and prevalent attitudes and essentially created this case by parading around all these liars. There's no proof anywhere that he raped these women, and there biggest proof? Him "admitting" in a deposition that he purchased drugs to give to women. The media played on this. They understand people still don't have the same attitudes towards having sex under the influence, especially for women, as they had in the 70s an…
/r/MensRights31/01/16 01:41 PM
2

This is just an over-exaggerated, possibly satirical take on how blacks view the Cosby case. Disclaimer: Most blacks do not think Cosby is being framed by the "Illuminati", they, however, KNOW he is being framed by an establishment that obviously has it out for his legacy.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 01:37 PM
1

So, if I understood this correctly, the gender gap among blacks is 74% percent and for non-blacks, the gender gap is 51%, But if you look at the gap between black males and white males, you'll see a difference, but if you view the gap between black females and white females, there is no difference, thus making the race gap less important? This is cool, will be saving this. Can't tell you how many times I hear black women play oppression olympics with black men, yet they seemingly have all the be…
/r/MensRights31/01/16 01:33 PM
8

Won't happen.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 01:12 PM
2

Can we possibly start a petition to get her removed as the professor of communications?
/r/MensRights31/01/16 01:12 PM
2

That's great, and I commend you for being consistent, but I'm sorry. I'm out for blood. If we're going to start this trend where men get sacked for merely expressing themselves, IE Tim Hunt, or the dude who called that Aussie feminist a slut, then this women needs to have her well being fucked with on behalf of that. She needs to be made an example. Take the two aforementioned men, they got sacked on just words. Tim Hunt was a noble prize winning scientist, and although he's been reinstated, he'…
/r/MensRights31/01/16 12:56 PM
6

Ugh, really? I live in NY too, and I saw this ad and was excited.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 12:43 AM
2

The universe is not so bad after all.
/r/MensRights30/01/16 08:07 PM
23

Rofl.
/r/MensRights30/01/16 08:06 PM
3

Ah, definitely get you there. Most of feminist talking points are just projection.
/r/MensRights30/01/16 03:10 PM
1

How about, nah? I get what you're saying and while that response has no basis in actual science, it's a good response to illustrate the differences. Although, it would've been chill if Thunderfoot actually explained the real reason why we sit with our legs apart, which is due to difference in centers of gravity.
/r/MensRights30/01/16 02:32 PM
10

Most likely not because one, she has a vagina, and two, if they were going to take her job, they would've done it a while ago. It boggles my mind how this woman gets to keep her position when her incident went viral. But a guy can get sacked for say "slut".
/r/MensRights30/01/16 02:15 PM
0

For someone who explicitly said that "Dawkins gets misquoted all the time", you're really going to base your opinion on Sam Harris, someone who's been in many talks with Dawkins, on three quotes from a wikipedia page. Just check out some of this talks and interviews. Most of the things he says get taken and misconstrued so they can be used against in attempts of smearing because he doesn't hold the "right" ideas.
/r/MensRights30/01/16 01:05 PM
1

Please do not leave out Warren Farrell, Camille Paglia, and Christina Hoff Sommers. All feminist and/or former feminist who have been constantly smeared by the current feminist movement for not holding the "right" ideas. Erin Prizzey is another.
/r/MensRights29/01/16 11:43 PM
1

Sheesh. Throw Sam Harris in there as well. I believe Dawkins and Him make up half of what they call the fourhoresmen
/r/MensRights29/01/16 11:16 PM
1

Get a load of this sap.
/r/MensRights29/01/16 11:04 PM
1

Still waiting for her to lose her job.
/r/MensRights29/01/16 01:14 AM
2

Revolution, my friend. Revolution.
/r/MensRights29/01/16 01:07 AM
-1

Don't worry. WW3 will take care of ALL of this, I assure you.
/r/MensRights29/01/16 01:06 AM
1

Agreed, but Katniss is undoubtedly the draw for Hunger games. Twilights female lead wasn't the biggest draw in that series, the vampire boys were.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 01:01 PM
8

Woah there, really now? So black and/or minority men aren't men?
/r/MensRights28/01/16 12:22 PM
2

Can't really count force awakens. It didn't do well because of a female lead, it did well because it was star wars, an established brand that was returning to the big screens after a hiatus.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 12:20 PM
5

Personally for me, I won't be satisfied until she loses her job. I'm adamant about it because I've seen many men lose their job, essentially their livelihood, for much less than what this woman did.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 11:30 PM
4

Not going to happen, because while you can tout about all the virtuous things feminism espouses, you can't change it's history. And, my my my, does feminism have a history immersed in sexism and racism. The difference with the feminist label is that you're not only taking on the values espoused, but you're also taking on it's history. Which is why a lot of feminist get criticized for being hypocrites, which isn't necessarily true, it's just a lot of people don't know feminism's true history. The…
/r/MensRights27/01/16 01:35 PM
4

You shouldn't have to worry and I believe your "advice" may fall on deaf ears as he has already explained to you that many people who occupy this sub understand the push back mens groups on campuses have been facing in Canada. So you're attempt at implying this is some sort of echo-chamber where everyone agrees because it "confirms their persecution complex without needing or wanting evidence" is folly. In addition, it seems awfully like projection. What echo chamber did you crawl out of to expr…
/r/MensRights27/01/16 01:29 PM
5

This is just colonization of another male space. We can't even have our own bathrooms. Watch us be forced to leak outside now with this shit. I mean, why not, society already thinks we're animals anyway.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 12:16 AM
1

I posted this here, because I have a hard time understanding "privilege". Whether it be male or white, and it seems this activist doesn't seem to understand it as well.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 12:05 AM
10

I mean, yeah. I think people who are suppose to "protect and serve" would illicit more of a reaction, or outrage rather, by killing the very people they're suppose to be protecting and serving as oppose to you know, two civilians who share the skin color killing each other. Why even mention black crime in a topic discussion police crime is beyond me. Not saying that particular statement explicitly to you, just a general thought I have when people do bring up black on black crime in the topic of …
/r/MensRights26/01/16 12:37 PM
27

How does this woman still have a job when her incident was caught on camera, but all it took for Tim Hunt, a damn noble prize winning scientist, to get sacked was an accusation from a woman who blatantly lied to push her self-centered agenda, mind you, that very woman still has her job, too. I just don't understand how men can have their well being toyed with on mere accusations, but when you catch women in important positions acting like this, nothing. Why isn't there a petition to forcibly rem…
/r/MensRights26/01/16 12:24 PM
6

Don't know if you're being genuine or not, but MRAs, from my experience, don't engage in identity politics the way feminist do. I personally believe feminist do this to have their movement stay relevant, as well as keep a stranglehold on many narratives. Thing is with the MRM is that they focus on rights, and not social engineering. Btw, this is coming from a black male.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 01:03 AM
1

I think it's important to discuss how we got here and hold everyone and everything accountable. If not, are we not doomed to repeat the very same thing? I think your words are easier said than done, and of course, and I don't mean this rudely, it is to be expected. You're on the feminist side, so I really can't expect you to see where I'm coming from when I explain that discussing male disadvantages, and the subsequent advocating of mens rights, and discussing how thoughts and theories feminism …
/r/MensRights26/01/16 12:52 AM
3

But how can one talk to you about unequal custody of kids with out snarking and mentioning the feminist who oppose that? Who oppose shared parenting laws? Who oppose alimony reform? Who oppose father's right to parental surrender? I don't understand what you're saying or maybe you're just missing the point. One can not discuss the disadvantages males face without speaking on the very real influences ACTUAL feminist(and by actual, i mean feminist who actually have the juice. you know, the ones wh…
/r/MensRights26/01/16 12:40 AM
2

Bruh.....
/r/MensRights25/01/16 11:23 PM
3

She deployed so much female privilege tactics in that short video, it's amazing.
/r/MensRights24/01/16 02:23 PM
1

Love how the boys are framed as "children" when it's almost certain those fighting on the front lines are almost exclusively boys. Guarantee if with were girls, the word would be featured prominently in the headlines. This is why a lot of MRAs are clueless when it comes to the child soldier issue that hampers a lot of these countries. Another reason could be that while this is happening, there's grandstanding and screaming about girls being forced into marriage and how that is a more important i…
/r/MensRights24/01/16 01:55 PM
11

This is something i realized as well, and it's a tool right out of the feminist playbook. This is what you call having your cake and eating it too. These type of things have less to do with empowering women, and more to do with cleverly controlling male behavior. We're mystifying women with shit like this.
/r/MensRights24/01/16 01:44 PM
4

"It challenges the narrative in place and therefor must not have light shed on upon it."
/r/MensRights24/01/16 01:36 PM
1

Male human trafficking is not rare like /u/afrobean would conveniently have you believe. To every issue women face, there's an equivalent for males in some form, and usually, more heinous. Remember "bring back our girls" and the whole thing around girls going into child marriages without the slightest mention of boys? That's because, the boys in that situation were brutally disposed of, and when it comes to child marriages? More boys are forced into child marriage than girls, and with more respo…
/r/MensRights24/01/16 01:06 PM
4

When idiots like /u/bignicky222 think we care about they think of the sub.
/r/MensRights24/01/16 12:45 PM
24

What evidence do you have to believe any allegation? I want to hear evidence. You state you think he did drug and rape most of these women. So what evidence are you basing this off?
/r/MensRights24/01/16 12:08 AM
1

I'm sure you can find some US feminist organizations who oppose reformed alimony and divorce laws.
/r/MensRights23/01/16 12:22 AM
1

You're going to be waiting quite some time waiting for men to mobilizing around their victimization.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 12:39 PM
2

Full of it. If a 31 year old man was going after a 17 year old girl, there's no doubt he's going to be labeled a predator.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 12:03 AM
9

Because it's utter non-sense. What do they want? They want breast to be desexualized, ok, got it. So they want female breast to be view by males the same way they view their own chest? Got it. So, essentially the free the nipple campaign is an effort to reprogram hetero males to not be attractive to female breast. No? They just want to be able to go out in public topless? Then why even beg the question of "why are so many men outraged by a Free The Nipple Picnic?". If you, as a woman, are going …
/r/MensRights18/01/16 11:45 PM
1

Exactly. Which is why a lot of progressive feminist have changed their rhetoric from "equal pay for women!" to "equal pay for equal work".
/r/MensRights18/01/16 04:23 PM
1

Dude, come on. It's Australia isn't it? What were we expecting?
/r/MensRights17/01/16 11:40 PM
1

The pinching of the sides are a BIG NO NO. I got sacked on a retail job when i was 22 for doing that exact thing in response to a similar action to that of the one your co-worker deployed. It's all fun and games until she decides it's time to get HR.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 04:25 PM
8

I commend you for sticking to you guns even in the face of obvious shaming
/r/MensRights16/01/16 02:46 PM
7

This is essentially what all those white women were hoping to happen when they publicly accused Bill Cosby.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 02:31 PM
6

So, you mean to tell me, we can't shame sluts. We can't even shame the women who lie about rape, but we can shame men who don't want to pay for a child they likely didn't want, and to the extent of essentially doxxing. Got it.
/r/MensRights13/01/16 11:27 AM
2

Well, you can start by linking her to this study: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1998/11/981112075159.htm and then politely convey that the reasons a male takes the suicide route is vastly different from reasons a female does. A female typically ATTEMPTS, as a means to signal to others that she has a problem that she needs attention and solving on. It's essentially a "cry for help" tool for women. Males on the other hand, typically FOLLOWS THROUGH with suicide because they see it as a solu…
/r/MensRights10/01/16 02:27 PM
1

I second /u/EvilPundit request for the uploading of said files.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 01:52 PM
2

I'm guessing you've never heard of the world of bdsm?
/r/MensRights09/01/16 01:13 PM
1

Isn't brigading against the rules? Why are feminist allowed to do it? Sorry, fairly new here.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 12:26 PM
44

To think, Chris Gayle literally got banned from a league for complimenting a women publicly. This teacher was emotionally torturing an autistic boy, and there's proof. Still has a job. Must be nice to have a vagina.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 12:17 PM
2

Exactly. What /u/ee4m doesn't understand is that the media is conflating words to shape your perception of this case. Their blatantly misrepresenting instances to illicit mass outrage. There is no viable proof that points to Cosby being a rapist. Just the media spinning. Fortunately, people are starting to research the case themselves.
/r/MensRights06/01/16 02:45 PM
1

Depends on what type of women we're speaking of.
/r/MensRights06/01/16 02:02 PM
1

I'd like to see the citation on that one.
/r/MensRights03/01/16 12:50 AM
2

Historically, which group of women were oppressed and for what reasons? To simply say, "historically, women are oppressed", is essentially whitewashing history. "Historically" white western women have never been subject to oppression, yet the bulk of feminism's representation is, well, white western women. so i beg the question once more. When people say "historically, women are oppressed", what type of women are we talking about here?
/r/MensRights02/01/16 03:55 PM
2

Yeah, until that violence can be used in your favor, correct? You're okay with "men being overwhelmingly more violent" in things such as wars that protect your rights; the rights you can sit at home and split hairs over. You're okay with it when that veracity is applied to the disposable jobs men do to uphold your everyday life. Fine with it when that very violent nature you speak of allows us to be "disposable, thus push the boundaries, advance societies, create, etc while simultaneously keepin…
/r/MensRights27/12/15 02:10 AM
1

How so?
/r/MensRights26/12/15 04:50 PM
2

No. And that's where a lot of women lose the argument. When you say things like this, you explicitly slice the genders into teams. When you say "well, yeah, men are more likely to experience violence and threats, but it's mostly from other men!", you're invalidating by essentially saying "That's team killing! so that's invalid because it's not being done by us, the opposite team" and I find that's how a lot women view it, which drives a lot of their core values, whether it be feminist or not. Yo…
/r/MensRights26/12/15 04:50 PM
6

Actually. We can make the argument here that what you call "patriarchy" can be more appropriately called "gynocentrism".
/r/MensRights25/12/15 04:33 PM
3

Where did this ridiculous notion that women are the only ones who deal with objectification come from? Or this notion that men need to be objectified in the same way that women are or it's not valid. Women largely have the better end of the stick when it comes to objectification, mainly because it's typically men who are objectified as tools for society. Whether it be tools of wars or tools of labor, amongst other things. Male objectification is male disposability, and that my friends, is someth…
/r/MensRights23/12/15 03:22 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter