TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

thatusenameistaken Archive

View 0 posts and 708 comments by thatusenameistaken on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

even in a lesser of two evils situation, its pretty clear which one is less anti-male. as just one issue, do me a favor and right click the sentence below and read for yourself what it says: which US states have gone to 50/50 default custody and what are their politics at the state level? don't try to pretend there isn't a SHARP poltical divide on which party is entirely beholden to the feminazis. report back if I'm wrong.
/r/MensRights23/06/26 08:35 AM
1

Look at the breakdown of who is voting for what. Women lean HARD Dem, many if not most making their choice based on the ability to freely murder their children.
/r/MensRights23/06/26 05:55 AM
10

women have been the majority voting block in the US since 1984. the reason the country is going to shit IS WOMEN VOTING.
/r/MensRights23/06/26 05:50 AM
6

Feminists aren't poorly informed, they're complicit in the lies. Many of them literally hate men and the rest see sympathy as a zero sum game: any given to men (or children, remember the #1 feminist issue is being able to murder your unborn child) is ripped screaming from women. Wider society is subject to the "women are wonderful effect". Women can't win a physical or logical battle against men so they use emotions, deceit, and gaslighting to win their battles.
/r/MensRights23/05/26 07:49 PM
6

Feminism is inextricably linked with punitive child support and alimony. One of the first things they fought for was primary care paid for by the father via the tender years doctrine. Fathers used to be the ones generally given custody, because they had the responsibility to raise the child. You had responsibility, you got authority to carry it out. It's there that women started fighting for and getting rights without responsibilities. All of the authority, none of the responsibility.
/r/MensRights16/05/26 02:55 PM
14

child support has never been about the rights of the child, it's always been about the rights of the mother. it was always about punitive backdoor alimony. if it was about the rights of the child it would have started out at 50/50 or the parent with higher income would retain primary income.
/r/MensRights15/05/26 08:50 PM
12

Is it, or is that men who have that natively are less likely to be divorced?
/r/MensRights12/05/26 12:22 AM
13

Never, never sign a contract that rewards the other party for breaking it. That alone would be bad enough, but they're encouraged to break it. By friends, by media, by society at large; the nanosecond that something turns even a little difficult or (worse, in their eyes) "boring".
/r/MensRights12/05/26 12:20 AM
17

The first thing to understand about many women is that if they aren't attracted to you (i.e. you aren't in the top 5-10% in looks/status/power) then you are literally not a person in their eyes. You are not a human being with wants and desires and needs, you simply do not exist. All their complaints are rooted in that. When they feel oppressed it's because they don't have, without any effort on their part, the lifestyle that the top 5% of men can afford. That's how, without even a lick of cognit…
/r/MensRights05/05/26 05:19 AM
11

You're overcomplicating it, look at history. Patriarchies have a chance to evolve into literally everything else after they solve Maslow's hierarchy. Matriarchies have never gotten past the Maslow cutoff.
/r/MensRights13/04/26 10:17 PM
1

It all comes down to whether you believe what people tell you or what they show you.
/r/MensRights13/04/26 10:00 PM
1

Yes, but doing it to someone underage is another level, just like doing it to someone in your care is another level.
/r/MensRights02/04/26 02:27 PM
0

Oh holy fuck, their censorship is so bad that they think they can MAKE reality bow to their use of language?
/r/MensRights02/04/26 12:11 AM
-8

Eh, I call bullshit. The bare minimum due diligence for a professional reporter should be a modicum of research into the subject. Like seeing that it's statutory rape at a minimum in the jurisdiction it took place.
/r/MensRights01/04/26 11:22 AM
11

For anyone else coming to this late, please take note if you CBA to read the article: It happened in Wisconsin, not the UK. Age of consent is 18. It happened repeatedly and to multiple victims, this was not a single occurrence. There is video and text message evidence. Clear pattern of grooming (buying things & special treatment for victims, etc.) behavior by this evil cunt. She admitted, to police, giving her victims alcohol but denied "selling them drugs." Wanna take a bet?
/r/MensRights01/04/26 11:11 AM
7

so what age where they actually? There is mismatch in title and article They said it was ongoing, you think maybe somebody had a birthday after she started raping them?
/r/MensRights01/04/26 11:05 AM
2

It's not in the UK, read the actual article.
/r/MensRights01/04/26 11:04 AM
3

...remember that this took place in Wisconsin. Read the article before trying to nix someone's intelligence.
/r/MensRights01/04/26 11:04 AM
13

I think we can assume they were, given the context. They mention special ed, they mention them being in the same room, and the fact she was actively grooming them. That and the fact they're actually throwing the book (light as it is) at her makes me take that $20 bet all day. If it wasn't special ed kids, this wouldn't even be in the news.
/r/MensRights01/04/26 11:01 AM
25

more likely to use less lethal attempts ...because many of them aren't legitimate suicide attempts, they're attention seeking behavior. They're coupled with "cries for help" to family, significant others, or even exes. Had a buddy whose on again/off again GF pulled the "guess how many pills of ____ I just took" multiple times. One of my sister's friends slit her wrists purely for show (shallow and the wrong way) trying to get an ex back. I'm sure that by no means is it a majority but I'll bet it…
/r/MensRights25/03/26 04:10 AM
50

You have to understand that they just don't care. Unless you're one or more of: extremely attractive, rich, connected, have a lot of clout, women don't see you as a person. If they don't want to have you ask them out you don't count, you're just an annoyance and should go back to being furniture. That's why they simultaneously complain about women being oppressed while celebrating more women than men getting degrees/buying homes/etc. They only consider the top 10% of men as equal human beings, s…
/r/MensRights24/03/26 02:31 PM
1

Grow up. Hi pot!
/r/MensRights11/03/26 04:40 PM
1

...and regained the right to vote when they left it. Try to keep up. Pot, meet kettle. Man, when you're wrong, you're REALLY fucking wrong, and CONFIDENT about it. We won't even get into what refusing to sign up for Selective Service limits in your "granted" rights. EARNED, not granted.
/r/MensRights10/03/26 09:21 PM
23

went to jail
/r/MensRights08/03/26 06:30 PM
28

why? maybe because "no" switched from the worst thing to the best thing she can say...
/r/MensRights06/02/26 04:57 AM
19

It's really simple, honestly. It's Schrodinger's feminist. A woman is simultaneously oppressed and empowered, and remains both until she decides which benefits her more in the moment. She can be both at the same time if it gets her what she wants. Women "not needing men" is empowering because they have all of the agency and none of the responsibility, the state (aka men) covers that. MGTOW is therefore offensive and evil because they're removing agency from women and making them responsible for …
/r/MensRights25/01/26 12:01 AM
1

And that was exactly the intent behind it. It will only ever be enforced against people not on the insane leftists' side, so the men on their side were fine with it.
/r/MensRights14/12/25 01:34 AM
8

Bro, trials aren't 30 seconds after the arrest. No, a man wouldn't already be convicted and serving his sentence. This isn't Law & Order or CSI.
/r/MensRights12/12/25 05:38 PM
14

Why is any group for men or supporting men is automatically labeled misogynistic? Why do leftists call anyone disagreeing with any of their points Nazis? See: Their treatment of J.K. Rowling, a screeching leftist on every jot and tittle except trans nonsense. They aren't calling you a misogynist because they're afraid of you, they're calling you a misogynist to dehumanize you, discredit you, and eventually justify violence against you. See: Incels being labeled terrorists.
/r/MensRights12/12/25 04:58 AM
1

If boy scouts can allow girls, then i think girl scouts should do the same. No. Both Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts should return to and be allowed to remain gender specific spaces. If you want to combine them, start your own fucking co-ed scouts. I’m not sure if I like the idea of hobbies being gate-kept by gender. They don't need to be 100% gender restricted, but I think the decline in quality of all the media I listed is largely due to men being browbeaten and shamed into female standards in hobb…
/r/MensRights08/12/25 05:39 AM
47

I can't imagine why, after feminists have persistently infiltrated and shut down every single men only third space. Not even the boy scouts were safe, because god forbid 8 year old boys got to hang out without girls. edit: of course bro deleted his comment after it didn't go his way. comment below (or at least the first couple lines that show in notifications): u/theholyromanempire42 replied to your comment in r/MensRights The boy scouts thing would be more of a problem if boy scouts and girl sc…
/r/MensRights07/12/25 05:27 AM
2

99% of them would die of starvation within a week to a month, as 95%+ of logistics and infrastructure jobs from oil field workers to electricians to truck drivers to farmers are men.
/r/MensRights07/12/25 02:57 AM
9

masculinity and feminism. the word you are are looking for is femininity, not feminism. one is a description of natural and social female behavior, the other is a supremacist ideology. yes, it's always been about supremacy, not equality. it has ALWAYS, all the way back to before there were "waves", been about gaining all of mens rights without the corresponding responsibilities or giving up women's privileges.
/r/MensRights02/12/25 04:54 AM
10

And the majority of voters are women. and they've been the majority for 40 years.
/r/MensRights01/12/25 08:51 AM
3

even when a judge tells you you cants see your kids as much as you’d like. That's subjective and women with anything but 100% custody will bring up the same complaint. Be Objective where the vast majority of dads are denied even every other weekend and split holidays, much less 50/50.
/r/MensRights29/10/25 12:04 PM
15

Why does it seem like feminism is just one giant society-wide shit-test?
/r/MensRights21/10/25 05:17 PM
1

Studies have to go through vigorous ethical standards before it can even be conducted, researchers also have to include a reflexivity that discusses their potential bias and how they will make sure this doesn't affect the research. Which is why there's a replication crisis right? I don't trust "scientific studies" as far as I can throw them, especially anything involving psychology where they can't reproduce more than a third of all studies.
/r/MensRights17/10/25 05:15 PM
1

Men do more damage than women do, but women conduct and initiate violence as often as men do, and one of three killings by partners is by women. Are you counting violence by proxy? Because if that's not counted you can throw those statistics right out the window.
/r/MensRights17/10/25 05:04 PM
1

Why would men report things like DV when doing so means the man is more likely to be hauled off to jail than his abuser? You have to change the system before you get men to seek help from something more likely to punish them for asking than to offer help.
/r/MensRights17/10/25 05:03 PM
0

Do you have any examples You made a generalization, I made a generalization. I'm not your google to look it up for you or your student having to cite sources, do your own damn research.
/r/MensRights17/10/25 04:56 PM
1

but a lot of men also don’t fit into that system, so it should be more flexible! aka more like what works for women, aka not an actual male support structure. Stop using the exception to disprove the rule. I'll quote another comment here that was spot on: is the space is forced to become an inclusive space, and thus no longer male centric. Once it's no longer male centric, it's no longer good at treating men's issues,
/r/MensRights17/10/25 04:47 PM
1

I would say domestic violence still tends to have gendered patterns, even though it can happen to anyone Yes it does, and those patterns are female abusers. Most DV is reciprocal, and women initiate more often. Of nonreciprocal violence in normal relationships, women are more often perpetrators than men. The lowest DV rate of any relationship is gay men, the highest is lesbian women. If you want to "fix DV", change the princess narrative.
/r/MensRights17/10/25 04:43 PM
2

How to help? For a start, drop the concern trolling and victim blaming from your introductory sentences. Then stop asking how to teach men to be like women, because what works for women does not and never will work for men. Men are not defective women, they are men. Your entire post drips with condescension. Being vulnerable and talking about their problems doesn't help men, it hurts them. What helps men is hobbies, physical activity, and simply being appreciated. Stop taking away male-only spac…
/r/MensRights17/10/25 04:35 PM
2

But the reality is, therapists aren't some advocate who is seeking to break a marriage or blame specifically men. You apparently live under a rock, because a huge percentage of them are exactly that.
/r/MensRights17/10/25 04:27 PM
1

Ignore it, double down ad absurdum, or get specific: ________ this is better with one of two facial expressions; disapproving stare (Tommy Lee Jones does this well) or utter disdain aka the "Are you sure you wanna do that?" raised eyebrow(s). Shaking your head in disbelief also works. Yeah, I am misogynist, because women are literally the worst and I wish I could go my entire life without ever interacting with one. I also hate Jews and black people, and I think puppies are obnoxious. I don't hat…
/r/MensRights17/10/25 04:11 PM
2

No, they genuinely don't think they need to because women are the majority voting block (and they vote as a block more than men do) everywhere they have the vote.
/r/MensRights17/10/25 04:05 PM
3

a man who is a clear exception and smarter than other men and meant to be a genius type character. On the rare occasion this happens, they're not allowed to be both straight and white unless they're the villain. In any case, the guy who is smarter must spend at least 10% of his on-screen time preaching the PC party line.
/r/MensRights17/10/25 04:01 PM
13

Portrayal of men in all modern advertisement media
/r/MensRights17/10/25 03:59 PM
9

the other genders, like men and gays There are two genders, some genetic abnormalities that can generally be put in one of those two, and a lot of mental illness.
/r/MensRights11/09/25 10:06 PM
62

Why is it always “women sacrifice so much”? As if Men supporting a family through tireless work isn’t equally stressful? Because women literally can't see men that aren't in the top (depending on how recent your sources are) 5% to 20%. They don't exist, they don't count as people. Therefore all men are lazy rich douchebags. Women are solipsistic by nature because of biological reality, they have to be selfish to produce and care for young. If you don't train any of that out of them socially, the…
/r/MensRights06/09/25 09:14 PM
15

this needs to be higher. all of intersectional _____ is just one big Marxist struggle session designed to make people turn against one another. when it's targeted, it's targeted at what would otherwise be the strongest opponent to Marxist takeover (strong men/nuclear family)
/r/MensRights06/09/25 09:11 PM
1

Anything's possible when you lie. Women in Northern European (Scandinavia, etc) countries choose tech less often than women in the "third world" countries. No I'm not gonna source that for you, you have the same access to search engines I do.
/r/MensRights02/09/25 01:23 AM
13

I met a woman in West Virginia once who was a miner in the 70s. Last year I was speaking with a guy about trades and his daughter is training to be a welder and the union she wants to join has to do with oil rigs. Let's not pretend like women can't work a mine or on an oil rig around other women. And I think you're being extremely disingenuous. "while they're the minority" understates things by an order of magnitude. Even your anecdotal evidence is lame and proves my point more than yours. You m…
/r/MensRights01/09/25 06:20 PM
14

While they're the minority, there are women who work in mines and on oil rigs so I'm not sure what that has to do with anything. 99% of that already single digit minority do admin work. they aren't roughnecks and miners.
/r/MensRights01/09/25 05:54 PM
1

they wouldn't survive a week, not 99% of them. who do they think runs the infrastructure to support billions of people?
/r/MensRights01/09/25 05:52 PM
7

Not just a man, but an English man. Not British, English. Connery was by far the most popular and had the best movies, but IMO the quintessential Bond was Roger Moore, because he had the look and mannerisms and the upper class accent down better than the rest.
/r/MensRights19/08/25 08:10 AM
6

misandrist misinformation yeah nah here's some minutes from the House of Commons recently. there's wikipedia pages about just a fraction of the rape gang offenses. No surprise it went unreported when the cops were in on it. Woodchippers for all of them.
/r/MensRights13/08/25 05:43 PM
6

comments that are pejorative/insulting I agree something like this could be done, but for a compliment or flirty one-liner? Not only no, but fuck no. We're all grown ups here and it's 20 fucking 25. Unless it goes past mean words into direct threats, this is evil levels of oppressive, and it's designed that way from the start. It's literally set up to destroy healthy interaction between British men and women. And it doesn't matter if you enforced it equally, it would just be equally oppressive. …
/r/MensRights13/08/25 05:36 PM
3

Well then stay snug in blissful ignorance champ.
/r/MensRights13/08/25 05:22 PM
3

How much you want to bet me that you won't find names like Muhammed, Yusif, Amir, or Khalid anywhere in that report? Meanwhile Muslim rape gangs have run so rampant that most cities in England have massive protesting going on right now. You don't think this is linked? You don't think it establishes a pattern of the UK government going after natives in favor of immigrants, because they're afraid of the British people actually rising up?
/r/MensRights13/08/25 03:53 PM
5

Only if they aren't immigrants. That's a protected class. If on the other hand you react negatively to the cultural enrichment brought by the Muslims raping British women and children and the government's lack of addressing it, there is a special task force set up to bring you to justice.
/r/MensRights13/08/25 08:31 AM
1

Maybe drink and smoke less and your reading comprehension will grow. For the record I was proving your point and provided the link to a sub that's been proving that point (feminists have nazi tendencies) for about as long as reddit has existed.
/r/MensRights12/08/25 04:08 PM
16

No you're not, there's a sub entirely devoted clowning it and the feminazi subs like twox. The whole raison d'etre of that sub is copying TwoX/feminism posts/comments and substituting in the appropriate words. edit: the sub is r/menkampf.
/r/MensRights10/08/25 05:54 AM
7

none of those sources are mainstream, and if you read any of them you'll notice that the mass mutilation is being pushed by the UN. you didn't make the point you thought you did.
/r/MensRights01/08/25 01:47 AM
19

doesn’t that apply to the accused? not if they're white males. and yes, you can track which cases aren't white males by the presumption of innocence and the media bending over backwards to not even identify them by race, much less religion, locality, or names.
/r/MensRights26/07/25 07:00 AM
5

And who sits on those malpractice boards, if you even get that far?
/r/MensRights30/06/25 01:50 PM
8

I went to therapy and it was with a woman. 90% of the time that's worse than no therapy. They don't understand how men deal and will make you sicker because they give you female oriented solutions. And that's the ones that genuinely want to help their male patients. A good chunk actively harm their male patients because they dislike men.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 12:56 PM
7

it's mostly men committing all the sexually violent crimes how can you tell? even when women rape barely pubescent boys, it's "they had an affair" or "a torrid fling" and the victim is on the hook for child support.
/r/MensRights28/06/25 06:03 AM
16

what if A tiny tiny fraction of a percent of the exception doesn't disprove the rule.
/r/MensRights24/06/25 11:06 PM
10

Your third paragraph exists because of your second paragraph. You're letting them set the narrative, and they view it as a zero-sum game. For women to get more salary, men's salary must drop. Do more (aka equal, women work something from 5-10 hours less a week on average) work to get more salary? That's misogyny! Stop catering to "rights" without equal responsibilities. That's just a "gimme something for nothing" mentality.
/r/MensRights16/06/25 04:50 PM
13

A century or so ago, before civil rights and women's suffrage, this was a real problem. Was it actually, or have you just been gaslit into thinking it was? Feminism was always about something for nothing, back to the very first cause championed with the Tender Years Doctrine. Fathers got custody because fathers were held responsible for the kids. Now? Fathers still held responsible, never get the kids.
/r/MensRights04/05/25 05:11 AM
4

you might want to quote the post you've copied over, at first glance it looks like you're giving YOUR opinion. to quote put > with a space before each paragraph break, it will look like this: I'm sick of hearing about men's mental health Does anyone else find it odd that men's mental health has become such a PRESSING CONCERN for society even though women attempt suicide more and have higher rates of mental illness? I literally feel like I'm being brainwashed to care about this issue, I can't go …
/r/MensRights02/05/25 01:16 AM
5

They think they are because they do get away with it.
/r/MensRights02/05/25 01:14 AM
3

if YOU run the numbers I'm not your research assistant, get to work.
/r/MensRights09/03/25 10:42 PM
1

WHY THE FUCK DO WOMEN WATCH PORN IF IT'S BASICALLY FILMED RAPE? Because most of them get off on it. The single most common kink women have is being taken against their will. Study after study show it's well north of 50% of women have some form of non-consent as a fantasy. It wasn't men who made 50 shades a bestseller. That's not unique either, go pick up any random romance novel from the 50s to current and it's likely got at least one rape that turns into stockholm syndrome when she finds out he…
/r/MensRights09/03/25 09:23 PM
10

a lot of them have no problem being with underage boys? Which is grape. How does this make sense? Reject men their own age, but go after kids? they are there for power over others. it's why kiddy diddlers all go into teaching, youth ministry, etc.
/r/MensRights20/02/25 03:04 AM
6

IN UTERO. Don't let the fraud last until birth. NIPP tests can be done at the first prenatal checkup and only require a blood draw from mom.
/r/MensRights10/02/25 10:31 PM
11

surprisingly the top comments are calling out the bullshit.
/r/MensRights03/01/25 08:03 PM
2

It's a perfect replacement- It doesnt accuse you of SA, it doesn't complain, it's always ready when you are, it can't get pregnant, it won't take half of your possessions when you get rid of it. Only downside? It wont do the dishes or make you a sandwich. :) Thad Castle is in the house!!!
/r/MensRights30/10/24 08:40 PM
3

Look up all the articles on teaches being caught giving failing marks to famous literature plagiarized for the sake of exposing the habit that teachers grade based on how they emotionally like a student rather than their performance. ...and the best way to do that is to regurgitate their words back at them sufficiently changed to make them agree with themselves. Engineering students, for example, take humanities classes to fill optional credits with easy A's, the reverse is not true.
/r/MensRights24/10/24 03:37 AM
3

a humanities field is intrinsically easier compared to a hard science is pretty laughable But it is though. You can bullshit your way to a humanities degree, 90% of it is regurgitating the teacher's words back at them with slightly different vocabulary.
/r/MensRights24/10/24 01:40 AM
1

I've seen it slowly transform into something ugly and unnatural. It's always been that way. White feather movement.
/r/MensRights24/10/24 01:16 AM
-1

As a woman im so sorry this is how you feel. "I'm sorry you feel that way." Ah, textbook gaslighting.
/r/MensRights24/10/24 01:14 AM
0

he did very much want that child and was amazed that kid didn't have his intellectual disability because it probably isn't his kid. jenny would totally never lie about something like that, right?
/r/MensRights17/10/24 09:25 PM
18

the media is complicit and evil in their extremely biased reporting on shit like this. nothing but glamour and family shots of the female perpetrator, even when convicted of rape the headline attempts to divert blame. "says he's traumatized" is them trying to put doubt in the mind of the reader.
/r/MensRights13/10/24 06:35 AM
4

Do feminists even believe that men have equal value anymore? They never did, it was about something for nothing from the very start.
/r/MensRights12/10/24 04:57 AM
14

Do the women who lament men not going to war in their country want men to die pointless deaths? Genuinely no, they don't care. Feminism is a hate movement, nothing more and nothing less. The women doing this don't see any but the top echelon of men as human beings, and the top echelon generally avoid getting drafted. Unless they lose a deeply beloved relative, they generally don't see it. The only women who ever admit women have an advantage in some areas generally only do so because they saw th…
/r/MensRights10/10/24 05:02 PM
33

Feminism is about female empowerment which is ok. No it isn't, and no it isn't. Feminism has always been about something for nothing. Keep female rights and benefits while gaining male rights and benefits. Shirk female responsibilities while avoiding picking up any from men. Keep all women's only clubs while invading any and all male only spaces. You can't empower one side of a coin without removing power from the other. edit: example below One of if not the very first major feminist wins was th…
/r/MensRights10/10/24 04:47 PM
1

If they didn't have double standards, they wouldn't have any.
/r/MensRights09/10/24 05:15 PM
76

even that put the "fairer sex" in too much danger. Not danger, too much accountability.
/r/MensRights08/10/24 01:45 AM
2

And don't even get me started on the average pregnancy rates for garrison vs. deploying/deployed units. Until they institute required contraception, any job with even a large minority of women will have a huge turnover rate of men. Ask a male USN corpsman or chaplain's assistant about how that goes. They wind up forever deployed with the USMC or on small ships because women pull all the cushy CVN and shore duty slots.
/r/MensRights30/09/24 02:25 AM
2

Notice that it's only officer academies doing this in the UK and US, not general recruiting for enlisted? They're literally trying to brute force a two tier system to the military just like your average job. Women get a fast track to the cushy office jobs with power and $$$, but they don't want any part of equal representation in the hard jobs.
/r/MensRights30/09/24 02:20 AM
-10

So now you're moving goalposts? Like you, I was talking about the victims; not the perps. And rich perps will face less justice compared to the average guy than female perps, money always wins out. Bieber didn't get ignored and belittled by the media any more than Britney Spears, Amanda Bynes, Lindsey Lohan...
/r/MensRights29/09/24 02:01 PM
27

Hey now, be honest. We get shit on enough without playing the snowflake game where it isn't warranted. There's a whole chain of Disney/Nickelodeon female child stars that got done just as badly and they got just as little help. Do I even need to list them? Because If I do, that list is gonna be longer than this whole comment.
/r/MensRights29/09/24 07:32 AM
2

You're a woman so you literally aren't equipped to understand. Please put your feelings away and don't take any of this personally. A woman literally doesn't have this problem, and it's a HUGE deal if a hospital loses track of whose kid is whose, people go to jail over it. For guys, there are no such safety and justice mechanisms. In fact, it's exactly the opposite. It's default protocol for medical personnel to LIE to the man there with his wife/girlfriend if the kid isn't his. Can you even fat…
/r/MensRights15/09/24 02:44 PM
8

DO YOU REALLY THINK THAT YOUR PARTNER WOULD DO THAT? DO YOU HAVE PROOF? CAN YOU TELL THAT BETOND REASONABLE DOUBT? Because if you don’t have 100% assurance that it’s a valid concern you will loose your partner. And will need court battle to see your kid. So, your response to entirely valid concerns is shaming and violence by proxy? Shocking.
/r/MensRights14/09/24 04:19 PM
8

Yup. Among other things, I was one of four kids who was not sent to private high school. I was drugged with SSRIs as a 15 year old for depression because I was justifiably angry and upset that my three sisters all went to private school and got paid for cars, while I had to pay for mine (a car my parents picked out) out of money I earned with my after school job and paper route. I literally was out of the house from 530am until 930-10pm, and had no money to show for it because I had to pay my wa…
/r/MensRights14/09/24 04:01 PM
3

Why..? Have given some thought to this. because women with $$$ spend $$$ on consumer bullshit and live paycheck to paycheck. men with $$$ buy property, improve the lives of their families, and invest in their futures. this creates a mobile middle class, and the ruling elite wants to do away with that. Men with something to protect will protect it. Men with nothing to protect want to watch the world burn. This isn't new, the first shots were fired at black men in the 60s by destroying the black f…
/r/MensRights14/09/24 02:47 PM
2

Then it's not a fucking innocent question, is it?
/r/MensRights14/09/24 02:35 PM
19

Bodily autonomy. Male genital mutilation is done largely for cosmetic reasons and because the medical industry makes big $$$ off it with a double header: perform unnecessary surgeries (covered by insurance, so it's really a triple as that affects premiums) and sell the body parts for $$$ to cosmetics companies or medical research (quadruple $$$?), it's the primary source of stem cells. It's the literal fucking essence of evil. Criticism of girl babies and toddlers getting their ears pierced is m…
/r/MensRights14/09/24 02:19 PM
14

Aren't the thresholds for passing lowered for women? Immensely so, but the instructors and senior staff that point that out get bad promotion reviews and then magically the girls pass. You can find the truth if you dig deep enough but those articles get memory holed hard. The non-woke lost that battle almost a decade ago.
/r/MensRights10/09/24 09:05 PM
18

This must be unconstitutional and against Human Rights. You cannot force someone to support an ex and the child she had with someone else Oh man, wait until you find out about boys raped by adult women paying child support to their rapists.
/r/MensRights09/09/24 12:45 AM
11

this is probably massively skewed due to single parent households being mostly mothers Yes, because the biggest single chunk of male abusers of children is single mother's dick-of-the-week.
/r/MensRights09/09/24 12:41 AM
21

It was always about something for nothing, aka rights without responsibilities. The earliest victory was the Tender Years Doctrine, where women were granted custody without being required to uphold the corresponding obligations that fathers were held to when they were retained custody.
/r/MensRights02/09/24 06:29 PM
14

"hero who intervenes" Ask literally any cop, EMS, or social worker what type of call has the highest risk of violence. every single one will tell you DV, regardless of who is being violent, and it's generally not the one who got the cops called on them. For that matter, ask any bouncer or bartender how likely white knights are to be attacked by both parties only to have the damsel they were trying to save leave with the villain.
/r/MensRights18/08/24 01:38 AM
8

Not just that, states also get federal funds for every dollar of child support collected. So they're collecting on both ends. We won't even get into the literal wage slavery of jailing men who can't pay their child support meeting inmate labor schemes.
/r/MensRights17/08/24 10:53 PM
19

Child support is a separate issue. It's not the same issue, it's the exact same issue using "for the children" as a wedge. Child support is weaponizing children for the benefit of the mother, not ensuring the well being of the child. If it was about the benefit of the child the father would get default custody, the stats are known and have been known for decades on how much better single fathers are for outcomes than single mothers. Court enforced child support is about skimming a % off all that…
/r/MensRights17/08/24 10:03 PM
32

neotenic traits just date lonely short men Because neoteny is not about size, it's about facial structure. Big eyes, rounder face, etc. Rape is about power. Even a five foot nothing fully grown man is not going to be as vulnerable as a 6'2" teenager, and he doesn't have the baby face to attract the female child rapist. She can't overpower him physically and can't pull adult 'jedi mind tricks' on a kid in the emotional and physical turmoil of puberty.
/r/MensRights17/08/24 09:21 PM
1

Why do I need to make a guess about a statistical fact?
/r/MensRights16/08/24 08:33 PM
3

Her choice, but his right to know she murdered his child. Even if he's totally fine with it, he has a right to know. If she kept it he'd have been held responsible for it, so why doesn't he even get the right to know it existed in the first place? responsibilities without rights equals slavery.
/r/MensRights16/08/24 08:30 PM
23

Nah, I worked at a sports bar for a while, and drank after work with a bunch of the waitresses and bartenders. Usually it's more like: "I've only had 3 or 4 drinks." Yeah, right. She had 3 picklebacks and two vodka crans, on her tab. She had at least another 3 or 4 shots bought for her by her regulars, and she's been to the bathroom three times since clocking out. Each time she comes back to the bar with pinholed pupils and wiping her nose. She hasn't eaten anything all day (worked a double shif…
/r/MensRights16/08/24 03:19 AM
107

I'd bet 90% of the time women claim they were 'roofied' they just drank too much but won't accept responsibility.
/r/MensRights15/08/24 10:26 PM
3

So fucking retarded. They do understand that it's a tiny fraction of people that do this, and those people aren't deterred by anything but violence, right?
/r/MensRights15/08/24 07:00 AM
1

any good arguments to this? "So then body count matters, and male cheating isn't as bad as female cheating?" For a real argument, look up and then point out the % of serial M>F sex offenders that were sexually abused by women as children and teens. That usually reframes it enough in their gynocentric mind to get it. It is statistically significant, I'll leave it at that.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 11:36 PM
7

A paternity test should be done at every child’s birth, In Utero. A NIPP can be done as early as 7 weeks and requires nothing more invasive than a blood draw from mom. There are conditions that pop up during pregnancy that are genetic, the tests are ~$500 and would be cheaper if default, there is literally no good reason not to run a paternity test at the first prenatal checkup.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 11:30 PM
6

That whole comment section thinks DV is gendered and is more likely than a woman lying about paternity. Color me unsurprised.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 11:25 PM
3

widely known Most people don't go to a specialist who will tell them the truth until they're actually going through it. You got lucky with your primary care provider. There are many primary care physicians who absolutely toe the feminist party line as long as a malpractice suit isn't in their foreseeable future. As long as they collect their fee and can beg off with "I didn't give definitive advice, I sent him to a specialist." Shit, look at how they renamed sex change to "gender affirming care"…
/r/MensRights12/08/24 06:51 PM
4

She didn't force him to do it, he chose to Maybe he chose his words poorly, but you can't tell me women aren't aware of the power dynamics in marriage/divorce or are unwilling to use that background threat to get what they want. The difference is men actually do lack the same agency women have in a marriage and family courts. And you can't tell me she isn't trying to manipulate him even now through his kid: It’s been almost a year since this arrangement, and my son asks me occasionally why I don…
/r/MensRights12/08/24 06:14 PM
10

Really bizarre post, the account is a day old and has no other content, and has a unique name. So it's a throwaway account like almost every single post on AITA/offmychest, or any of the slew of advice subs? People tend to keep deeply personal shit separate from their normal user accounts.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 06:11 PM
14

Isn't it widely known that a vasectomy is NOT reversible ? Not in mainstream media. The narrative is that it's 100% reversible and as easy as getting it done in the first place.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 06:09 PM
8

agree and amplify. "yup, I need a pair of tweezers to take a piss. but can you prove me wrong about what I posted?" anyone not blinded by hate will see the joke. those blinded by hate will think it's a sign of weakness and lean harder into the insults, revealing themselves to those who aren't.
/r/MensRights09/08/24 02:26 PM
2

What if I told you the easiest, most common way to be confident and charismatic is... ...wait for it... ...be attractive.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 05:04 PM
20

For me it means, that a man like this, is too good to just hook up with, ...but the OP of that post didn't say that. She told her BF of almost 3 years that she would not hook up or be FWB but she would marry him. She said she wants all the wife benefits without him getting a wife that wants to fuck him.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 04:34 PM
6

No man has ever felt as entitled to sex as the average woman. Turn one down and see what happens. Ask male strippers or any man working at a gay bar how free with their hands and angry women are when turned down, even when they know the attention is unwanted.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 04:30 PM
25

Because there are consequences to being an asshole as a man. You act the asshole at the wrong guy on the wrong day and there is a non-zero chance you get punched or even shot. Women are used to being immune to consequences of bad behavior, up to and including assault, sexual or otherwise.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 04:27 PM
2

they utilize this tactic every bit as much as men Much more often than It's literally the default setting of hypergamy. They want someone taller, stronger, with more income...
/r/MensRights08/08/24 01:41 AM
38

They can be done at the first prenatal checkup (as early as 6 or 7 weeks) for ~$500. A NIPP test requires the usual swab from the possible dad(s) and a simple blood draw from mom, no amniotic fluids or anything else invasive.
/r/MensRights28/07/24 03:37 PM
34

She actually is a single mother, with a 10 month old child. if you couldn't see that red flag...
/r/MensRights28/07/24 07:34 AM
1

So, anything not binary is either birth defect or chemical corruption? Pretty sure that's what they've been saying.
/r/MensRights28/07/24 12:51 AM
0

the left is based on hating and demonizing anyone who doesn't kowtow to their platform, not the rich. the rich just have fuck you money and care less about getting canceled.
/r/MensRights28/07/24 12:39 AM
321

paternity test stat. the crazy that would do this would 100% get railed raw by randoms because she sees you as a wallet.
/r/MensRights28/07/24 12:37 AM
13

Nothing tanks worker morale faster than no consequences for bad workers. Not even a total lack of rewards for good workers comes close.
/r/MensRights25/07/24 12:10 AM
1

because it costs men and benefits women to divorce. it's not that fucking complicated.
/r/MensRights23/07/24 04:05 PM
13

what is this fixation on teaching boys to treat women properly? Grooming boys to act against their best interests and condition them to accept the abuse showered on them by a gynocentric society. No one with two brain cells together believes constant education on "consent" is what stops a rapist, it's used as a bludgeon to beat men into submission as boys so they're used to the abuse and trained for the yoke.
/r/MensRights23/07/24 01:39 PM
1

It's a restaurant thing, goes back to bars/restaurants in the 20s or 30s, means an item is all out. It's old enough the origin is uncertain.
/r/MensRights16/07/24 12:38 AM
6

I'm glad I stopped giving them money
/r/MensRights13/07/24 06:10 PM
28

I mean, do we have unilateral rights over our bodies or not? normalized MGM male rape victims being required to financially support their rapists male only Selective Service requirement Keep in mind the majority of voters is female.
/r/MensRights10/07/24 06:29 AM
3

A man gets raped, Boy. Doesn't even need to be a man yet.
/r/MensRights06/07/24 01:53 AM
1

Your shaming of those circumcised men You need to get out of your own headspace. I'm not shaming anyone. If you feel ashamed, maybe you need to look at why that is. I was circumcised at birth like most Catholics in the US, I don't have trauma over it or feel shame from it. I can, however, recognize and call it what it is. Mutilation. I have never felt what a normal human male feels when having intercourse. Even my masturbation feels different than it's supposed to. Refusing to admit that it's mu…
/r/MensRights05/07/24 07:39 PM
1

Call it what it is, mutilation. Pretending it's not isn't shaming and it isn't saving the feelings of men and boys who had it done to them, it just perpetuates the cycle of abuse.
/r/MensRights05/07/24 08:28 AM
25

first world problems (catcalling) which is 90% straight lies anyway
/r/MensRights04/07/24 04:58 PM
1

There's no benefit to intentionally changing your language Yes there is, because they changed it to make it seem normal. Circumcised appears more normal because the opposite term is uncircumcised. Controlling the narrative by controlling the language, see: Pro-choice vs. anti-abortion narrative, which pro-life groups have to fight against to even start the argument on equal footing.
/r/MensRights04/07/24 02:38 PM
2

No. It should be a mandatory part of the first prenatal checkup. A NIPP costs under $500 and doesn't require more than a blood draw from the mom. No reason for a man to be defrauded of so much as a single doctor's visit if he isn't the dad/
/r/MensRights03/07/24 11:55 AM
1

what a pretentious way to say you don't know how to use a search engine.
/r/MensRights01/07/24 03:50 AM
2

Buddy, you should talk to ethnic males more, as what white males have been recently experiencing is what ethnics have had to endure for centuries do me a favor and copy "etymology of slave" into google and click enter, my entitled and ignorant ethnic brother.
/r/MensRights30/06/24 08:22 PM
4

I just don’t get it. Rape isn't about sex, it's about power (and for groomers, attention) Grooming that barely pubescent boy into thinking he wasn't being raped gave her both power and attention.
/r/MensRights30/06/24 07:32 PM
1

it's not the lead, but I'm honestly surprised they even put a mugshot in the article. usually it's straight glamour shots or a selection of their most attractive social media pics.
/r/MensRights30/06/24 07:29 PM
16

"He looked at me while being unattractive!" - off to jail "He didn't look at me while being attractive!" - off to jail
/r/MensRights14/06/24 11:19 PM
16

...and women sacrificed nothing to get universal suffrage, while men fought the bloodiest two wars in history to gain it in that big jump that just go happens to coincide with the post ww1 to post ww2 years. Not to mention men still don't get it without corresponding responsibilities in 99% of the world, requiring a life debt discharged either direct military service or the possibility of a draft, while women get it completely without obligations in 99% of the world. Just look at the Ukraine to …
/r/MensRights13/06/24 03:28 PM
1

The way intersectional Marxism/feminism works, their power comes from being seen as 100% victims with 0% agency. The more boxes you can check off the higher your victim points. They see admitting anyone else has a problem reduces their power, and they see all men as the enemy. It's why kowtowing to them never works and why they literally eat their own, witness the downfall of super feminists like Joss Whedon the second they slip up.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 05:41 PM
22

they ignored exculpatory evidence to ensure it stayed that way. Recommending against further investigation isn't ignoring it, it's actively burying it. That decision should come with jail time at least equal to the time served by this man, for anyone involved in that decision. It's suppression by the state and a blatant violation of the rule of law and the principle of innocent until proven guilty. That's the only way cops and prosecutors stop the witch hunt nonsense.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 11:24 AM
1

Plumbing, electrical, welding, iron work, manufacturing, lineman, etc… Until you're bidding on government or corporate contracts without checking off the DEI boxes.
/r/MensRights27/05/24 04:19 PM
35

The millisecond it became successful.
/r/MensRights26/05/24 08:58 AM
36

Feminazis pushed the Duluth Model.
/r/MensRights24/05/24 06:11 AM
7

Unrelated, there is only one s in misandry. Related, press F for doubt that 2/3 of women in Mexico City are being sexually harassed on the metro. I doubt 2/3 of women in Mexico City even use the metro, just for starters. Then you have the base premise. Men who commit the actual harassment are just gonna laugh at this if they even notice. Just like all the "teach men not to rape" bullshit, especially when it's aimed at actual schoolboys, this does nothing. Rapists aren't gonna give a shit what yo…
/r/MensRights23/05/24 01:19 PM
1

Do you even read the comments you're replying to? go back up to where this started. Throughout history, poor families would have tons of children so they could be put to work. The last 50 years are so are literally the blink of an eye on a historical scale. We're one food crisis away from a large percentage of that suburban population trading in their lawns for truck gardens and chicken coops. A 6 or 7 year old kid can do most of the maintenance of either. More kids = more hands. Kids can still …
/r/MensRights21/05/24 02:11 AM
1

Do you even read the comments you're replying to? go back up to where this started. Throughout history, poor families would have tons of children so they could be put to work. The last 50 years are so are literally the blink of an eye on a historical scale. We're one food crisis away from a large percentage of that suburban population trading in their lawns for truck gardens and chicken coops. A 6 or 7 year old kid can do most of the maintenance of either. More kids = more hands. Kids can still …
/r/MensRights21/05/24 02:11 AM
1

Why are you making subjective judgements on an objective answer to an objective question? Although maybe you weren't being objective when you asked the question, maybe it was just bait. Sorry nobody bit in the last week. Put your agenda down for a second now and then, whatever that agenda happens to be. You asked: Feeding and clothing someone for 18 years didn’t used to be expensive? ...of someone talking about the history of child care costs. I'll break that down more since you didn't get any o…
/r/MensRights20/05/24 10:11 PM
1

What point do you think I'm trying to make?
/r/MensRights15/05/24 12:32 PM
12

they are not the true left no true scotsman huh?
/r/MensRights15/05/24 12:25 PM
7

throughout history, men got custody because they had the responsibility.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 08:02 PM
3

Feeding and clothing someone for 18 years didn’t used to be expensive? not when you put them to work at age 5, no.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 08:02 PM
-3

And a 2-3 year age gap with a minor is exactly what I was talking about. Nope, you don't get to gaslight me, your comment is right the fuck there. You don't get victim status off this. You didn't lead with the exception, you led with: Society commonly uses “rape” for underage sex ...and the only time that happens is when it's statutory rape. How often do articles excusing the behavior in women raping teenage boys pop up in this sub? Couple times a week at least, right?
/r/MensRights12/05/24 11:39 PM
-10

Society commonly uses “rape” for underage sex, No they don't. Don't push your pedo bullshit here. There are generally exceptions for fake IDs/Romeo & Juliet clauses as there should be. Anything outside a 2-3 year age gap with a minor on one end is predatory as fuck and should at minimum be called rape, flat out.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 11:20 PM
14

So women didnt get the "extra treatment" aka "men helps female co-worker out" and thats why the satisfaction has dropped in 2017. Yup, they stopped getting catered to.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 06:32 AM
3

I didn't say to put women first, yes you did. This is why inequality for women is bad for men too,
/r/MensRights09/05/24 07:32 AM
6

The only way to bridge the gap is if someone does it first. You can't compromise with people who only know how to take. Trying to do that is how we've gotten where we are.
/r/MensRights09/05/24 07:17 AM
15

Look at the article. Rich dad it looks like, if there isn't a rich husband.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 04:00 AM
5

That kid must have been a real early developer. Fuck you, this response by you is why they don't take this shit seriously. You're trying to give this kid props and assign him agency.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 04:18 AM
1

It's a shit test. Refuse to play.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 08:26 PM
7

AFAIK the idea was to give women the obligation to message first That is absolutely not how it was pitched, advertised, or implemented. It was pushed with a hard "now the creeps can't even message you" message from the start.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 09:14 PM
9

Even the most ardent advocates pick and choose specific aspects that they desire. IMO yeah, whichever aspect benefits them the most with the least responsibility.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 09:13 PM
1

It's not men or women being better at raising kids. You need both and it's best in a solid marriage/relationship, because moms and dads teach kids different things. Moms give kids self esteem and a safe space by giving constant encouragement. Dads give kids boundaries and confidence by allowing kids to push their own limits and providing structure. The vast majority of moms, no matter how "badass" simply can't do command voice. The vast majority of dads, no matter how loving, can't give kids the…
/r/MensRights29/04/24 08:39 AM
2

The biggest tell is if a husband/wife constantly shit talks the other in front of the kids. Even if your husband or wife is a total piece of shit, never badmouth them to the kids, because to the kids they're just mom or dad. You don't have to lie and say how good they are, but never be the one bringing down your kids' view of your current partner or ex.
/r/MensRights29/04/24 08:34 AM
2

could this be relating to traumas surrounding abandonment, that the father leaving might have inflicted? How many fathers leave vs. mothers push them away/leave/play games with access to kids? Pretty sure you're talking about the edge case. IMO most "deadbeat dads" were pretty obviously shitty father material in the first place, so a large portion of that blame still falls back on the single moms. Parental alienation by the mother is at least as prevalent as full up abandonment by the father. Gi…
/r/MensRights28/04/24 08:40 PM
14

Also, notice that most school shooters in America are male. Male children of single mothers with a history or mental health issues. Last study someone linked on the topic had both at over 90% correlation, and iirc the single mother % was the higher.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 06:07 AM
6

I will bet $20 right now that they didn't control for specialties without even getting into men being more likely to perform a higher risk procedure. There is a much higher male:female ratio of neurosurgeons and heart surgeons (hell, just surgeons in general) than GPs.
/r/MensRights23/04/24 03:55 PM
18

Become a free pass? It always was a free pass. Just look at the first few big victories for "equality" feminism championed: Financial and legal independence within marriage without being legally or financially responsible. There were men put in debtors' prison because they couldn't pay their wives' taxes. Universal female suffrage without the draft. This was especially egregious given feminists' absolutely abhorrent behavior (White Feather Movement) in WW1 Great Britain. 6% of the adult male pop…
/r/MensRights23/04/24 09:17 AM
2

Yup. Weren't aware of their actions? Tell them it's an all expenses paid resort facility, meals and gym time included.
/r/MensRights15/04/24 02:54 PM
22

Crime of passion defense literally only works if it happens immediately after the triggering moment. Go look at some case law. You leave the room to go grab a gun from the safe? No longer applicable as a mitigating factor. Even if you want to try and apply that here, it would only be valid for her boyfriend, not the 9 year old she threw from a moving car into freeway traffic holding her fucking 8 month old baby sister. There is no justification, no excuse, no "well what about." She had a fucking…
/r/MensRights14/04/24 01:17 AM
34

Intent doesn't bring the dead back to life, and she didn't "oops moment of insanity" kill or try to kill her whole family. She literally bundled the kids in the car to go push them onto the 405. This wasn't a crime of passion my bro. She's apparently an astrology nutjob and killed them during the eclipse because either: she's legit crazy (kill her cause she'll do it again next eclipse) she's a religious fundamentalist (kill her cause she murdered people over it) it was a good excuse to cop an in…
/r/MensRights14/04/24 01:08 AM
75

Nobody is dismissing it, they're saying it's irrelevant to the consequences she should suffer for doing something so blatantly evil. There are no extenuating circumstances that matter when what you did was murder your entire family, including a literal baby.
/r/MensRights13/04/24 11:21 PM
27

Mentally ill people do not get to go free, it's not an excuse. "They weren't in their right mind, they didn't know what they were doing.' Ok, fine. Tell them the electric chair is an amusement park ride.
/r/MensRights13/04/24 11:19 PM
2

At least they didn't use a cutesy euphemism like "affair" or sex romp" and they used a mug shot instead of the most attractive social media pic they could find.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 10:27 PM
10

Hairdressers are the same as any other tipped job where you make money off your looks and personality rather than work ethic. They're equivalent with strippers, waitresses, bartenders, etc. The "I need a real job" follow up from those is nurse/medtech/dental assistant. The "I want to be around less skeevy guys but don't want to actually work" follow up is realtor.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 09:42 PM
9

I guarantee significantly more than 2/3 of the "household expenses" are shit he would never use or pay for in the first place. No, we don't need a new dining room set, a new sectional, or the 4th set of drapes this damn year. No we don't need 27 random Amazon packages of utter shit a day.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 09:36 PM
7

Anyone in this situation needs to immediately contact HR HR is not your friend, they are there to protect the company. the EEOC The EEOC specifically exists to deny the best qualified candidates in favor of demographic bingo.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 05:59 PM
7

Male genital mutilation. Do we really need to go any further?
/r/MensRights20/03/24 04:44 PM
4

Last time I checked, two is plural. It's a bit dicey applying the parenthetical plural to words ending in y, but it's arguably grammatically correct rather than a rule against it existing.
/r/MensRights20/03/24 08:11 AM
2

So does his.
/r/MensRights20/03/24 07:47 AM
1

Pretty sure the (ies) and question mark indicate he's not sure if it's one or more.
/r/MensRights20/03/24 07:43 AM
10

It's also "sex romp" or "illicit relationship" or some other not just innocuous but sexy euphemism. Call it what it fucking is. It's fucking rape or sexual assault at the least. Hold them equally responsible if you reverse the genders. Change the damn reporting. Any man gets a mugshot or the worst photo they can find of him looking angry. Women get the best they can find off social media or a glamour shot pic sent in by the defense. Publicly shame the fuck out of every single brainwashed man tha…
/r/MensRights20/03/24 07:34 AM
122

Feminism was never about equality, it was about getting all the rights men had while dodging all the responsibilities while simultaneously shifting as many of women's responsibilities as possible and not only not losing any of their rights but getting extras benefits neither sex had.
/r/MensRights19/03/24 07:48 AM
5

My favorite bit of this gobbledygook: The blatant attempt to hype up HR goons by calling them "practitioner" as if it's a difficult. important, and impressive job title. One no doubt requiring a postgrad degree and years of experience, like Nurse Practitioner.
/r/MensRights16/03/24 03:25 PM
24

Because feminism has never been about equality, it's always been about keeping their special privileges while taking as many of men's away as they can and pushing any responsibilities women have off on men as well.
/r/MensRights08/03/24 03:35 AM
17

It says it right in the name. Equal rights to men. The without giving up our privileges and without ANY responsibilities addendums were silent until they got the majority voting block, but it was always there, all the way back to Seneca Falls. Just look at the White Feather campaign, primary caregiver laws, etc. All the rights men have, plus bonus ones for women, and men with all of their responsibilities plus as much of women's as they can vote in.
/r/MensRights07/03/24 03:02 AM
38

other than praying for him I'll bet you $20 that her prayers were along the lines of 'please god help my husband get back to work because we're really struggling. AKA husband hurt, I'm most affected.
/r/MensRights07/03/24 03:00 AM
8

The only way to fix it would be to stop demonizing male teachers and male behavior in boys. No disadvantaging girls, no advantaging boys, just stop treating them like they're defective girls. Stop It has to start in grade school, it has to involve masculine male teachers, and it has to include teaching boys how boys learn, not forcing them to behave like girls. Stop drugging them, give recess back, reinstate competitive environments, stop assigning an entirely female-centric reading curriculum, …
/r/MensRights06/03/24 12:49 PM
10

The problem with your solution is it ignores how teaching is done in favor of looking strictly at the tests. By the time boys read middle school the desire to learn has been beaten out of most of them, because they aren't taught or rewarded in ways that benefit them. Boys are punished (starting in preschool) for behaving like boys and tolerated for behaving like girls, while girls are allowed free reign to do whatever they want and rewarded regardless.
/r/MensRights06/03/24 12:48 PM
53

hey hey hey, let's not be skeptical. she could have had a psychotic break from smoking a blunt!!!
/r/MensRights02/03/24 09:50 AM
69

it's the dramatic pretty sure you meant to say "it's traumatic" what a hell of an autocorrect
/r/MensRights28/02/24 06:36 PM
34

It's because the case is on going not because she's a woman. When a male teacher does this they use perp (jumpsuit at jail or in handcuffs being put in the back of a cruiser) pics. And they don't say groped and kissed, they say sexually assaulted.
/r/MensRights27/02/24 03:47 AM
64

Of fucking course they have comments turned off. And they used the best possible pic of her they could find. Fucking wedding photos? Really?
/r/MensRights27/02/24 03:20 AM
58

Never, never, absolutely never stand in line for the men's room if it's women in line. I walk right past that shit at sporting events and concerts, they can meat gaze and/or act offended all they want. I belong there, they don't. If you need a cubicle go stand right next to the stalls and body any women out of the way as needed. It's your space, if you don't claim it they keep pushing.
/r/MensRights26/02/24 04:40 AM
10

because they'd be charging your with attempted murder.
/r/MensRights20/02/24 12:19 AM
1

All of, from the very start.
/r/MensRights14/02/24 11:45 PM
1

fearmongering and an attempt to dodge accountability, nothing more and nothing less.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 08:17 AM
2

ssshhh. he's a leftist who believes populism is right wing and so were the Nazis.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 10:37 AM
1

If your timeline is accurate (2 months pregnant) you can get a paternity test RIGHT NOW. It's a blood draw from her and the usual cheek swab from you. It's not expensive, from $500-$1500 usually.
/r/MensRights06/02/24 03:02 AM
13

Children should simply belong to their mothers unless UNTIL a man's paternity is verified using a state-sponsored test. At that point, he should have the opportunity to opt out of parental rights/responsibilities. If he opts out, she should have to prove intent to be a father to get child support. If he opts in, the default should be 50/50 custody with no child support. And they should be mandatory in-utero, as they can be done with a blood draw at the 1st prenatal checkup. that might actually s…
/r/MensRights28/01/24 06:19 PM
19

Paternity testing should be default in utero, it can be done at the first prenatal checkup with a blood draw that's happening anyway, just 1 more test tube. A positive test should be required prior to putting a father's name on the birth certificate and should be required before filing for child support. If married, a negative test should be automatic grounds for an at-fault divorce.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 06:16 PM
2

I dunno, but I've thoroughly enjoyed posting the following comment on every group/post that pops up in my facebook feed: "They weren't man Kenough." (accompanied by a Ken gif, either sunglasses or him with that sweatshirt)
/r/MensRights27/01/24 08:33 AM
12

the crazy defense is the biggest bullshit of all time. she had a weed psychotic break? fine. hook her up with some prime grade shit and tell her the electric chair is a fucking amusement park ride.
/r/MensRights24/01/24 03:41 AM
7

If you want a happy, healthy relationship with a woman, ensure that she feels safe and secure. If you accomplish that, you're essentially guaranteed a good life with her. Statistics do not remotely bear this out my bro. ...and Chris Williamson is a scumbag grifter telling women what they want to hear because it's more profitable than the truth.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 02:56 PM
7

Fellow Men, any advice? paternity test ASAP. 100% appears to be an attempt to baby trap, given it came right after some arguments. if she'll lie about the pill she'll lie about having a douchebag's kid so she can saddle a decent guy into paying for it.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 02:53 PM
1

I'm just trying to figure out where the comment I replied to went. Gave an honest answer and bro just vanished.
/r/MensRights19/01/24 09:54 PM
7

I don't really understand how you would go about doing that. Turn off all subscription fees for media. Stop going out to eat/drink except for special occasions, and then limit your spending. You don't buy new electronics if the old ones still work. You make your own coffee in the morning, pack a lunch, etc. It's surprising how little you really need to get by, even in an expensive area. You definitely don't need a new car, laptop, and phone every 2-3 years. Many people literally can't fathom buy…
/r/MensRights19/01/24 06:15 PM
9

This is how women generally express anti-social behavior, through destruction of reputation and proxy violence. The women who do this are every bit the predators that male serial rapists are, and should be treated as such. Instead they're generally given a free pass until their behavior becomes so egregious that they choose the wrong target, usually someone with political pull or money or both.
/r/MensRights19/01/24 08:45 AM
2

yup. every side tries to trump up charges. BUT. Only one side is championed and justified in it by mass media and politics.
/r/MensRights15/01/24 11:38 PM
5

Hate crimes literally exist as tack-on charges for people the system wants to shit on, like resisting arrest. They add them on if they want to punish you harder for the same crime, but leave them off if they want to be lenient. Commit one crime and get 15 charges, shit is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights15/01/24 02:17 PM
0

That's my point. That is the what if. She doesn't seem to you like the type to poke holes in condoms or "forget" her BC. But she herself said she wasn't sure if she'd keep it, then that she would 100% have been against it a few years ago, then she'd probably keep it. In the course of one conversation she went from "you're right we shouldn't have kids" to "I'm not sure what I'd do if I got accidentally pregnant" to "I would definitely have gotten rid of it 5 years ago, but now..." to saying she w…
/r/MensRights15/01/24 06:24 AM
1

Considering you have 0 rights the second she's pregnant, it's up to you how you proceed. She's already shown that you can't trust her to be honest with you without pushing, and who's to say she'll be honest when pushed in the future? Can you trust her to take BC? Can you trust her not to poke holes in your condoms? She wants kids and you don't, that's a fundamental incompatibility. Considering how easy it is for any form of BC to fail, you're taking a rather large risk even when wrapping it up. …
/r/MensRights15/01/24 06:09 AM
1

while other genders There are only two. Men and women.
/r/MensRights15/01/24 03:17 AM
1

After that I did after birth which is much cheaper. You're answering the wrong question. What's cheaper, monetary cost only? prenatal DNA test @ 12 weeks however much you spent supported a cheater for 8 months + DNA test after birth
/r/MensRights15/01/24 03:14 AM
3

Non-invasive prenatal paternity testing, which is one of the options for a DNA test while pregnant, can be done as soon as seven weeks into pregnancy Should be a required part of the 1st prenatal checkup. It's a blood draw, that shit's getting done already anyway.
/r/MensRights13/01/24 07:44 PM
2

They should be part of the first prenatal checkup, at that point they're a couple hundred bucks (would be less if more common) and are a simple blood draw. A positive paternity test should be required to name a father on the birth certificate and a negative one should be automatic win for an at-fault divorce if married. I'd go so far as to say a negative test should be grounds for felonious fraud, with worse penalties the older the kid is when the alleged father finds out.
/r/MensRights13/01/24 07:41 PM
1

yes. it took 3 generations to get this bad, it wasn't an overnight thing.
/r/MensRights12/01/24 07:46 PM
3

Let me guess, you didn't click the link or look at any of the links in the related tables?
/r/MensRights12/01/24 11:33 AM
5

Sorry bro, you're not just wrong, you have it basically flipped. STEM barely makes it into the top 5, and the gap is growing. https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=37 top 5 associates: liberal arts/general studies/humanities 39% (this does include pre-law as they mostly take political science and the like, but it is by no means the majority of this group) health related 17% (nursing and such, but also includes shit like health billing) business 11%% engineering 7% (tied) public services 3…
/r/MensRights12/01/24 11:20 AM
1

And what I'm saying is unless you just flat remove HR as a thing, it's going to be this way until the source of woke dries up. They created huge bureaucracies in the corporate world out of whole cloth to provide a place for all those extra college grads to go. It's entrenched now, unless you fire the whole HR department from the top down you're not gonna get that attitude out. Leave aside all the MBAs and law degrees that are now more woke than not. Remember when the ACLU actually fought for fre…
/r/MensRights12/01/24 09:16 AM
14

I always hear about this stuff at universities like Harvard and MIT but where it really needs to be enacted is in hiring and promotion in the workplace. Where do you think that all started? HR departments which are 90% feminazi Karens. Where did they start staffing? All the useless woke graduates from the universities that didn't take the pyramid scheme into academia. Academia started going full leftist back in the 60s, it took until the late 80s to really start in corporate America. You aren't …
/r/MensRights12/01/24 05:33 AM
12

Are you there to work or to be noticed by that cute guy in the office next to you? And that's all you need to know about that.
/r/MensRights09/01/24 01:51 AM
7

Two reasons: Men aren't allowed to have preferences. Women can't be held accountable for anything.
/r/MensRights09/01/24 01:50 AM
10

Toxic masculinity = The parts of male gender roles feminists don't like Healthy Masculinity = The parts of male gender roles that benefit women at that specific time for that specific woman The same trait can be either, it's schrodinger's misandry.
/r/MensRights08/01/24 07:32 PM
6

She’s helped produce some of the best movies I’ve ever seen Has she, or was she a glorified go-fer with access to the boss? The producer/executive producer title is more pollical than anything else, there are movies with a dozen of them. What has she actually been lead producer on? I challenge you to find something she had control of that wasn't shit. Benjamin Button? I'll lay odds that the director's wife likely had more control than she did. Any Spielberg or Lucas movie? You know they maintain…
/r/MensRights04/01/24 10:15 PM
5

executives believe that they can change the race or sex of a character in a crappy movie and suddenly make it compelling I don't think they do. I think it's more sinister than that. I think they've shown they're legitimately trying to destroy popular franchises with strong male role models, and their legacies. Look at how they treated every male character in Star Wars (white or black, from Luke to Londo) vs. how they handled Leia in the movies and tv shows alike.
/r/MensRights04/01/24 10:03 PM
11

Unless they start doing paternity tests, which should be a required part of prenatal checkups, as it's a cheap and simple blood draw from mom and the usual swab from dad.
/r/MensRights03/01/24 01:19 AM
2

That’s why divorce rates are so high, most women have a raw deal married to losers Oh bullshit. Show me the stats, because that is 100% something you made up to excuse women from accountability while proclaiming yourself "one of the good ones."
/r/MensRights25/12/23 01:14 PM
2

It was super egregious too, I won't call her by her name because it was so over the top. Columbia let that bitch walk around for months carrying a mattress protesting the guy who "raped" her after they did their bullshit biased investigation and cleared him. She fucking made a porno reenacting her "rape." How all that didn't go against their code of conduct I have no idea. edit: forgot to add one thing. It was a textbook case of woman scorned. The socials proved she wanted more and dude said no.
/r/MensRights25/12/23 01:05 PM
10

Men do need to contribute more generally in the household Do they? What's considered household work? I ask because if asked that qualifier, most women will answer with a list including every single traditionally female task and conveniently ignore all the male ones as if they require time or labor, or for that matter exist. Are you expecting that higher contribution from men with a wife working the same hours for the same pay, or does income level, time worked, or labor difficulty involved get c…
/r/MensRights24/12/23 03:12 PM
11

"Being a real men" is being men in a way benefits women. at the time they use that language. The definition by one specific woman could change 20 minutes later.
/r/MensRights24/12/23 12:00 PM
43

Funny how all the big bad oh my god men are evil rape cases turned out to be false accusations. It was like dominoes for a few years. Duke, Rolling Stone, The mattress girl...
/r/MensRights24/12/23 11:38 AM
3

Because prosecutors generally go on to become judges and politicians.
/r/MensRights21/12/23 09:35 PM
8

Similarly to the pill, it’s not the couples that use it especially when it causes side effects. It’s for women wanting control. Same will be for this pill. which is flat out why she's mad. how dare men have control over their bodies?
/r/MensRights19/12/23 03:53 PM
22

No more pregnancy traps or accidentally getting pregnant because the pill didn’t work in the end. Or she "forgot" to take the pill, or didn't pay attention when her doctor told her meds for _____ condition render the pill ineffective...
/r/MensRights19/12/23 02:02 PM
1

...of course they try to absolve women of all accountability for their choices.
/r/MensRights18/12/23 12:28 PM
58

If the execs pushing DEI gave two shits about equity they'd take huge pay cuts to give every single employee a raise, starting with the lowest paid. How the fuck people don't realize it's pushing a globalist agenda with permanent ruling class/underclass setup is beyond my understanding. Look no further than billionaire and politicians taking luxurious 2 week vacations to resort locales in private jets (@ 1 attendee per jet) for "climate forums."
/r/MensRights17/12/23 01:42 PM
9

“well who set that system up?” The 51% of voters who are female. Next.
/r/MensRights17/12/23 01:50 AM
6

Mock isn't the worst of it, like when women push off how hostile women can be when asking them out. "The worst that can happen is she says no." No, the worst is them vilifying lonely men to the point they're being called terrorists and the FBI runs stings on "incel" forums.
/r/MensRights16/12/23 04:18 PM
2

A hero is by definition a role model. Stop trying to move goalposts. Napoleon wasn't a simp, Josephine was a trophy wife to show his power that he ditched when she couldn't provide an heir. Did you really go with appeal to authority? I'd like to see your poll showing people think Jason Mamoa is white. There you go again assigning emotions to words on a screen.
/r/MensRights11/12/23 05:33 PM
6

A feminized male character is not a good heroic role model, pretty much by default. A "hero" that isn't even the main character in his own film isn't much of a hero. Josephine was a trinket, effectively the highest class whore in revolutionary France. Go look up some actual history, she monkey branched from one high ranking guy to another. Making the movie Napoleon = Josephine and massively downplaying or ignoring his role and history was a huge bait and switch. It made him look like a simp, not…
/r/MensRights11/12/23 02:15 PM
40

I didn't even need to argue the point, he disproved himself with the movies he chose to the point his comment got buried. But here we go: Aquaman - First time I've ever heard Jason Mamoa claimed as white. Wonka - the Titular "hero" is constantly upstaged by a black female child. This version of Wonka was feminized even more than Johnny Depp's Wonka. Silent Night - Haven't seen it or a review to judge it. Napoleon - This movie was 100% the Josephine story. Five Nights - Haven't seen it, so I'll g…
/r/MensRights11/12/23 06:20 AM
165

Because white males can never be shown in a good light, much less heroic.
/r/MensRights11/12/23 01:40 AM
3

Because if you have the right plumbing and/or political beliefs you are immune to the rules, in this case no brigading. If they can find even 1 poster from a sub they don't like after a link is posted from said unliked sub, they will claim brigading and the extremely biased supermods/admins will take action they are just looking for an excuse to take "disciplinary" action.
/r/MensRights06/12/23 07:59 PM
4

It's pretty simple, so using old numbers (it's worse now, this is like early 2ks data): Women literally don't see men that they don't find attractive. Women only find the top 20% of men as above average. 80% of men are invisible and thus irrelevant. Because 100% of women only see 20% of men, they're comparing the average experience of the top 20% of men to the average experience of 100% of women. This applies to academics/work/government funding as well. Because a small number of men will top an…
/r/MensRights06/12/23 07:45 PM
14

call any DV hotline as a male victim and 50/50 odds: you get referred to "how to stop being an abuser" they laugh and tell you they won't help you she stabs you 26 times with a knife, but you bruised her wrists taking it away? you get hauled off to jail, she had "defensive wounds"
/r/MensRights06/12/23 05:47 PM
15

Masculinity isn't a construct. However, anyone using the words "man up" or "a real man would/wouldn't _____" is almost always trying to exploit your masculine sense of pride and protection to do something against your best interests.
/r/MensRights06/12/23 06:53 AM
11

So only physical labor is masculine? Men get satisfaction out of problem solving and influencing the world, that doesn't have to be something physical like hunting or construction work. Software engineering is the mental-only version of building a better fish net or fixing the roof so it doesn't leak anymore.
/r/MensRights06/12/23 06:50 AM
6

Why emasculate men? Because emasculated men don't revolt.
/r/MensRights01/12/23 09:33 AM
6

misogynistic chanting
/r/MensRights29/11/23 10:23 PM
6

What the actual charge used is irrelevant when the publicly given reason boils down to "heckled a woman in a position of authority."
/r/MensRights29/11/23 10:11 PM
17

We have arrested two boys for misogynistic chanting at the female referee No, I'd say that's pretty fucking clear mate. What the actual charge is called is irrelevant if the official reason is "they were mean to a woman in a position of authority."
/r/MensRights29/11/23 10:07 PM
23

Imagine getting arrested for heckling a ref at a fucking soccer match.
/r/MensRights29/11/23 10:04 PM
14

Which stats and peer reviewed research had you snapping out of it? The actual DV statistics from the CDC (not that they're trustworthy, but it's meta statistics) that get buried with cherry picked stats. The Cliff's Notes breakdown: Most DV in M/F relationships is reciprocal. In M/F relationships with non-reciprocal DV, women commit it more often than men. Most reciprocal DV in M/F is initiated by women. The lowest DV rate in any type of relationship is gay couples. The highest rate DV rate in a…
/r/MensRights29/11/23 01:57 PM
7

40 days and 40 nights was fucked. Not only did his gf not take his side being raped by his ex, she blamed him for cheating!
/r/MensRights28/11/23 01:15 PM
5

It's invisible because the state took over most of those functions, which is why we're so fucked up and headed for worse. The black family was the canary in the coal mine.
/r/MensRights28/11/23 12:23 PM
6

WTF is with all these racists/sexists getting upset at me directly replying to "white men"? Ok racists, go do some research: guess what sex the largest voting demographic isn't. guess which race votes largely as a block, and for which party. guess which party is more anti-male, based on policies implemented. Who is in office depends on who is voting. The policies they implement are based on getting reelected, not serving their personal demographic, unless doing so gets them reelected.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 08:11 PM
2

Sorry, I didn't go checking the bio of one random comment I replied to. I don't base my arguments on the demographics of who I reply to, I use logic or if I'm in my feelings I just rant regardless. Why the hell would the color or sex of who I am discussing something with change how I talk to them? I know it's not 4chan, if it was 4chan you would have been both more rational and more literate, and I would have called you a faggot.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 08:08 PM
14

Triggered isn't a thing, it's either shaming language or used to excuse an overreaction. What black guy's response? I responded to an anonymous comment on an anonymous forum.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 09:29 AM
48

tell that to the white men who can't get a scholarship or grant. tell that to the white men at google who got a raise when they did a comprehensive salary review because everyone assumed were getting paid more than the women there, but they were actually being paid less.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 06:56 AM
35

It's worse than that, they just make different plays. Look at the Ukraine. They're still claiming equality while evacuating the country and leaving their men to die. Then hooking up with guys in the countries they evacuated to with no intention of returning.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 12:20 AM
16

They probably did ask men, but the answers they got didn't align with their narrative.
/r/MensRights25/11/23 11:41 PM
11

Because that's all those women have to offer the men they want. They aren't feminine, supportive, peaceful, or skillful in homemaking. Women with those qualities get married to the guys the women with nothing but sex want but can't keep the morning after the club because they're expecting to get taken out to brunch, not in his kitchen making breakfast. They say they want a relationship but what they mean is they want to be taken care of. The very idea they would have to put any work into a relat…
/r/MensRights24/11/23 10:25 PM
7

Remove those reasons, and we can assume that figure is reduced significantly. Why? Did you know that they've pretty much removed the blood type family tree exercise from grade school biology because so many dads found out they weren't dads? also kids found out they were adopted, but that's another discussion. Even if you reduce that 30% figure by two thirds, you still have a 1 in 10 chance that the guy on the birth certificate isn't the father. Satisfying a basic genetic need (assured paternity)…
/r/MensRights19/11/23 12:53 AM
8

It really is sickening. Look at the narrative being spun in that article. The most important victim according to the author isn't the teenager who was abused by an adult in a position of authority over him, it's his distraught mother. And the teacher isn't a predator, she's a "married mother of two," wholesome family pic included.
/r/MensRights18/11/23 11:07 PM
2

Does anyone care about the MEN dying No, unless it leaves a woman worse off.
/r/MensRights18/11/23 10:56 PM
9

This is an unfortunate mentality. reality. This isn't about trusting your partner anymore, it's about odds. It's also why it should be mandatory for all at the first prenatal checkup. It costs about a grand and needs nothing more than a blood draw from mom and swab from potential dad. Trust but verify.
/r/MensRights18/11/23 10:50 PM
8

Criticise the man's actions, not his appearance. Sometimes appearances show someone's character. He's the editor for a men's style magazine, judging people on their appearance is 100% of what he does day in, day out. You're allowed to return the favor, none of this "we need to be better" sanctimonious bullshit. Especially when it's a guy responsible for turning in a 50% female "men of the year" list. Frames without lenses? A "want nothing" tattoo while working at a fashion mag? Stylized diamond …
/r/MensRights17/11/23 12:40 AM
56

women in positions of power don't seem to care about their needs that much Worse. They are disgusted by and contemptuous of men/boys who show weakness, because it means they aren't providing safety/resources/attention for women.
/r/MensRights17/11/23 12:25 AM
4

What pisses me off the most about that is she knew before the trip. She took an alternate's spot for her own selfishness. I don't recall reading this part, but she not only quit, she knew she was likely to. In sports terms, if that's the case, she should have been on the disabled list.
/r/MensRights17/11/23 12:23 AM
10

"but she's the best" is she reliable? "no." then she isn't the best.
/r/MensRights16/11/23 08:24 PM
16

But you've heard it before, so delete this comment. Delete it yourself. This isn't 2x. This is a male space, not female. We don't censor those we disagree with, we attempt to argue the point and when they prove they aren't arguing from good faith we ridicule and downvote.
/r/MensRights16/11/23 06:31 PM
20

Simone Biles quit on her team
/r/MensRights16/11/23 06:28 PM
13

Well, they're most likely also trained on PR. That argument makes it worse, not better.
/r/MensRights16/11/23 06:25 PM
2

Sounds like someone bitter they're about to lose their spot (that they got when young and attractive) to someone younger and more attractive. She's just mad the gravy train is about over, she was perfectly fine with how it worked while she benefitted from it.
/r/MensRights16/11/23 01:07 AM
19

Did you read any of the rest of the 20+ links? It translates into all those other cases.
/r/MensRights15/11/23 05:06 AM
13

Because they don't think of men "below them" in socio-economic status as human. That means any 25 year old former server with an associates in nursing thinks she's above a plumber, even if said plumber owns his business, has 100 guys working for him, and is sitting on 7 figure income.
/r/MensRights15/11/23 05:03 AM
12

You don't even need war as a risk. Ask anyone who has been in the peacetime Navy/Marines in a mixed unit about pregnancy rates during workups and deployment vs. garrison/shore duty.
/r/MensRights12/11/23 04:16 PM
5

As a male, looking at the male side of the problem, It's gotta be male psychopaths who are in charge of this whole thing right? Oh man are you misguided. Maybe there are more male politicians at the very top, but the driving force is female. Google the White Feather movement for starters. Women are the majority voting block in just about every democracy. They piggy backed on universal male suffrage without any risk or responsibility. That universal male suffrage came close to simultaneously on a…
/r/MensRights12/11/23 03:03 PM
8

Call it what it is, genital mutilation. There is no legitimate medical justification for it and it's still legal almost entirely out of inertia and greed (hospitals make money off the procedure and selling the butchered parts to make fucking face cream) and most commonly is chosen for cosmetic reasons by the mother. (edit: in the US) You had a pretty reasonable post until the PS, but then you lost me. absolutely no shaming! Please don't comment FUCK RIGHT OFF WITH THIS SHIT. You do not get to co…
/r/MensRights11/11/23 01:43 PM
13

Why? Literally Hitler. It's an old joke but apt in this instance. Autistic/nerdy men (incels too) are socially inept by default. Women's chosen arena of combat for violence is social assassination. They literally chose the easiest possible (small in number, not good at the chosen form of combat, but highly visible) target, that can't fight back effectively. It's exactly like the choice of the Jews as scapegoat by the Nazis.
/r/MensRights11/11/23 02:28 AM
1

I'm neither upset nor ashamed, there is no such thing as "ableist behavior," and I didn't call you retarded, I said you were either being disingenuous or retarded. You clearly proved you are the former. Funny that I said women only try to look older if they're underage and you posted about about pre-adolescent face structures changing into adolescence and adulthood, which ends in the early 20s. Thanks for proving my point for me with your extreme reach as you tried and failed to prove yours. Go …
/r/MensRights10/11/23 12:20 AM
2

Are you really busting out the "if we weren't online you wouldn't say that" excuse? Sorry, in men's spaces an argument has to rest on its merits, you can't shame the truth into compliance. Calling someone retarded for acting retarded isn't "an emotional outburst," it's giving them credit for not being deceitful that they probably don't deserve. Women don't use makeup to look older unless they're underage and trying to get into a club or they're doing it for other women, because study after study…
/r/MensRights09/11/23 09:20 PM
5

sorry, no. women do not look better at 35 than they did at 25, unless they were fat and lost a lot of weight. no they don't. you're either being disingenuous or you are literally retarded.
/r/MensRights09/11/23 11:06 AM
7

Women in their 30’s are looking like they’re in their 20’s or even better, so you admit women are more attractive in their 20s? Try turning off the filters and taking off the makeup. and you'll probably reconsider that hilarious opinion.
/r/MensRights09/11/23 10:32 AM
60

They don't want good guys. They want bad boys that will commit to just them, usually only after they've passed the wall.
/r/MensRights09/11/23 01:33 AM
3

color me unsurprised.
/r/MensRights07/11/23 08:39 PM
3

it wasn’t a problem. Shit my dad has pictures of his high school back in the 60’s. Every truck had a full gun rack. Nothing happened or it was absurdly rare. It didn't happen because there was a full gun rack in every truck. Making public gathering places "gun free zones" just makes easy targets.
/r/MensRights07/11/23 07:06 PM
9

“we live in a country where women aren’t believed and it is extremely difficult for women to come forward” This is what bugs me the most. Women are literally celebrated for coming forward. They get cash and prizes, all the attention and sympathy they could ever want, and permanent victim card status. There is literally no downside. Unless, of course, the rapist is a leftist with access to power. Then of course we should "examine all sides."
/r/MensRights07/11/23 06:38 PM
8

I have never, and I mean never, bought "mentally ill" as an excuse to avoid the penal system. If they're that fucked up just tell them it's not jail time, it's an all-expenses-paid rehab facility. If they're that fucked up and they "didn't understand what they were doing" and killed someone, tell them the electric chair is a fucking amusement park ride.
/r/MensRights07/11/23 06:36 PM
3

Of course she does, because feminism is about supremacy and power, not equality. It's never been about equality.
/r/MensRights03/11/23 05:57 AM
5

'experts blame erotic alone time online as a major culprit' sounds more like a symptom, not a cause.
/r/MensRights01/11/23 12:47 PM
4

How many women openly joke about little boys having their genitals mutilated? Not just find it funny, but take it for granted that it's their choice as a mother to mutilate their son(s) based on nothing but their preference for how it looks.
/r/MensRights21/10/23 01:45 PM
14

How much do you want to bet the original incident wasn't nearly as one sided as she claims? There isn't a more obnoxious, confrontational group than a bunch of sorority girls out drinking. They just get away with shit because young and pretty.
/r/MensRights20/10/23 02:23 PM
12

Are you really comparing feminism to freaking TERRORISTS!? YES. Feminists started out as terrorists before they moved to proxy violence via the state. The law is flaw against men in some way and should be changed, but to blame Feminism for it is just wrong, and to blame every feminist group is even more wrong. The law is flawed largely because feminists campaigned to make it that way. Including women getting custody of kids by default. Go read some fucking history.
/r/MensRights20/10/23 01:59 PM
33

The world treats women like they have the responsibility of young children They get the rights and privileges of both men and women, but zero responsibilities. The average teenage boy is held more responsible for his actions than the average adult woman.
/r/MensRights14/10/23 11:25 AM
-4

I believe governments should have a national daycare program. NO. We already encourage single motherhood quite enough, we don't need to add to it.
/r/MensRights10/10/23 03:57 AM
1

Just understand that if you hear or see that phrase, anything that follows is simply trying to guilt/shame a man into acting against his own best interests. Full stop.
/r/MensRights02/10/23 05:50 AM
0

I identify as my mom, so yes.
/r/MensRights01/10/23 10:58 PM
4

Since you're offering and this apparently hurt your feelings, join the 41%. That's enough award for me.
/r/MensRights01/10/23 08:59 AM
14

(because many people still do not think transwomen are women), ...because they aren't.
/r/MensRights01/10/23 01:44 AM
18

You'd tell a dude to get a job.
/r/MensRights25/09/23 10:56 PM
10

alimony should not exist for working spouses ...and it should be capped at 5 years at basic living expenses level even then. go get a fucking job.
/r/MensRights25/09/23 10:44 PM
3

despite this she is very pleasant to be around. Of course she's pleasant to be around, you dop 95% of the house work (as well as all of the outside work I'm sure) while working 60 hours a week and making 75% of the income. I'm pleasant to service workers too. Don't let her and random women gaslight you.
/r/MensRights24/09/23 10:32 AM
7

and the feminazis used that case as a rallying cry to disallow texts/calls/social media as evidence in future cases. its unreal.
/r/MensRights20/09/23 08:48 PM
16

Most women still enforce gender roles ON MEN. FTFY They're perfectly happy reaping all the rights and rewards of both sexes' traditional roles while dodging the responsibilities of both.
/r/MensRights20/09/23 12:26 AM
3

Do you think the constant anti-male rhetoric and atmosphere of a profession aren't a visible deterrent to men who might be interested in entering said profession?
/r/MensRights18/09/23 03:29 AM
16

There is a point at which demanding a source is just trolling. I get it, it's hard to check and see if schools commonly have a "no male teachers alone with students" policy but no corresponding one for female teachers. /s Admittedly super difficult to spot all the female teachers abusing kids stories, because the rape is usually phrased as "date" or "sex romp."
/r/MensRights17/09/23 02:28 PM
61

Who are these missing "role models"? Aside from dads, the male teachers they've systematically removed from teaching. After all, every male is a pedo until proven otherwise in their narrative. Especially grade/middle school teachers. It's statistically likely a boy will hit high school before seeing his first male teacher.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 05:32 AM
98

easier to teach Control for female teachers. Aside from the lack of, for lack of a better term, "command voice": The root of the problem IMO is the almost total lack of male teachers, especially in middle school as testosterone starts to hit. The biggest single problem outside that is the systematic removal of anything resembling recess, kintetics, or competition I didn't have any issues in k-6 because my school had a couple male teachers that the female teachers would send "problem students" to…
/r/MensRights17/09/23 05:24 AM
1

No true Scotsman.
/r/MensRights16/09/23 12:44 AM
0

Answer your accusations? Because those aren't questions, they're an attempt to dismiss and vilify. LOL NO. Especially not after you ignored an entire litany of the abuses 1st wave feminists conducted under the guise of equality. I'd ask why you expect answers to your questions when you ignored my entire comment, but you're obviously a feminist, so your entitlement prevents you from behaving rationally. I'm not surprised, I'm not even tired. I'm just curious who this approach works on. I'll say i…
/r/MensRights15/09/23 03:17 PM
1

Wake the fuck up. take the "women are wonderful" blinders off, and read some actual history. From the very start feminism was about getting every single right men had, without sacrificing their own privileges or taking on any equivalent responsibilities men held. They didn't ask for voting rights. They were literal terrorists. They conducted a mail bombing campaign, among other things. They were Ted fucking Kazcynski a century earlier. They demanded voting rights without any corresponding respon…
/r/MensRights15/09/23 12:08 PM
2

What were some phenomena that caused this? And why? hormonal birth control.
/r/MensRights13/09/23 05:17 PM
3

Get a paternity test on all 3 of your existing children. Then get a better lawyer.
/r/MensRights13/09/23 05:15 PM
19

How about we just skip the horrible inhuman atrocities this time? what do you think abortions and trans surgeries are, if not eugenics?
/r/MensRights10/09/23 01:38 PM
9

Objectively no one is at fault. I'm sorry, did you read the same post I did? She directly emasculated him (you aren't a real man) and then threatened consequences if he didn't do as she said. That's not a set of expectations, that's literally seeing OP as inferior. She is 100% at fault.
/r/MensRights02/09/23 02:50 AM
14

Having now read your post: She sees you as a meal ticket and a come-up. She also has exactly zero respect for you, especially after you caved to her vague threat. Friends for 6 months, relationship for 2, and she's looking for a green card. Sure, she was fine paying 50/50 for groceries, but when she found out that would default to rent and everything else. AKA she wasn't actually fine going 50/50, that was a mask. She offered to look good but expected you to say you had it covered. Whatever you …
/r/MensRights02/09/23 02:47 AM
28

Without reading your post, solely based on the title: Anyone who pulls the "you aren't a real _____" is gatekeeping and trying to dismiss you/your feelings/your opinion. How often as a kid did you hear some nonsense like "you aren't a real Yankees fan if you don't know the relief pitcher's batting average against left handed pitchers." A woman questioning your manhood with "not a real man" is trying to shame you into acting against your best interest. Your girlfriend pulling that card out litera…
/r/MensRights02/09/23 02:25 AM
0

this is 2023. google it, I'm sure you'll find a source.
/r/MensRights24/08/23 03:48 AM
0

Particularly when you then call your ex-boyfriend to tell him how much he'll miss you when you're gone. ...and not cut the veins, or take about 1/4 the LD50 dose...
/r/MensRights23/08/23 12:51 AM
3

still in place. she murdered other women's babies. she'd have gotten off in any other circumstance but other women's property. make no mistake, it wasn't because she murdered babies. it's because she murdered the babies of other women, who didn't make that choice themselves. it's like the only time you ever see pedo female teachers get called out for rape: when their victims include girls. otherwise it's "Sex Romp" or "Torrid Affair" or some other terminology which basically gives the stamp of a…
/r/MensRights23/08/23 12:47 AM
3

and it happens more to girls. does it though? because having served in Iraq and with friends who served in Afghanistan, boys getting raped was not just rampant but US troops got ordered to ignore it. Look at the link in a comment below.
/r/MensRights23/08/23 12:44 AM
11

That said, avoid common law marriage traps make that a number: 3) do not allow them to cohabitate. depending on the state, don't even let them sleep over 3+ nights a week.
/r/MensRights22/08/23 03:19 AM
18

All 3 of my sisters went to (high 4 to low 5 figures a year each) private high school and got out of state university at least partially paid for. I was sent to public school and was expected to pay rent to keep living in my room from the day I graduated high school. They all got cars they picked out (used, but decent), I got my car picked out by my parents but I had to pay for it out of my saved high school job (two, paper route @ 530am and work after school from 4-9pm) earnings. None of my sis…
/r/MensRights22/08/23 03:18 AM
11

militarized and yet it's generally guys who either couldn't/wouldn't go in the military that are that way as cops. they're LARPing. legit vets tend to be the most relaxed (and therefore relaxing/calming) officers you'll meet.
/r/MensRights10/08/23 02:44 PM
3

What if I told you that they don't see the average man at all, and if you point that out you either get disgust or "not a real man" shaming. They don't care about dudes who got conscripted to fight in wars, they are invisible at best. At worst they are shamed into suicide (google white feather and the overlap with early feminists)
/r/MensRights09/08/23 10:53 PM
1

again, when it's stuff from childhood I get it. you don't even realize you're being assaulted. by the time you know what happened to you it's 20 years later and it's fucked up your whole adult life and any hope of a normal sex life. but a bunch of then-20 year olds hitting up Cosby 50 years later for party drugs from the 70s? no, sorry. it's not like popular culture of the time wasn't up on drug effects.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 10:44 PM
1

for the child actors sure, but I was talking the ones where actresses in their late 30s and 40s are going back 20 years to shit that happened in their late teens and early 20s.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 10:19 PM
15

preselecting for gullible clients.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 05:09 PM
1

Here's one for the folks promoting the Passport Bros concept don't the passport bros generally advocate moving to another country, not bringing a wife back to the US? I thought that was their whole schtick.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 11:54 AM
45

He will have bodily autonomy 90% chance she had his genitals mutilated without anesthesia as a baby.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 05:13 PM
48

and there's definitely no incentivization for falsely claiming that either. move along.
/r/MensRights03/08/23 09:00 PM
3

the whole metoo movement was hypocritical. it was almost entirely rich and famous women posting shit that happened 20 years before, long after they got the benefits of the "assaults" that were much more likely trades in kind: sex for parts.
/r/MensRights03/08/23 05:10 PM
2

I'm all for equality and everything. But this is madness. it's madness specifically because you're for equality. this woman literally got away with murder, literally because she's a woman.
/r/MensRights03/08/23 02:51 PM
27

Most people don't make much more than $50k/year. average adult income in the US is south of that.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 12:50 AM
3

If you go out on to oil rigs its always 90% men and the 10% women aren't doing the dirty, dangerous shit. they're doing office work in the only A/C on the rig.
/r/MensRights31/07/23 03:04 PM
10

that doesn't even take into account things like: "laundry - 4 hours" ...which is about 20 minutes of folding, 10 minutes of swapping loads, and 3 hours 30 minutes of watching TV.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 12:08 AM
4

but I do believe in alimony when a child is involved. that's called child support, the other half of the punitive damages awarded to women for breaking up their marriage.
/r/MensRights08/07/23 12:52 AM
3

because they already don't value any man equally as a human being, only what he can do for women. insisting you have no woman in your life renders you entirely valueless because in their eyes men only have validity granted to them by women.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 12:58 AM
14

one is a hate group and one isn't
/r/MensRights04/07/23 03:48 PM
18

what kind of fucked up therapist this is? the vest majority of psych majors are female.
/r/MensRights21/06/23 04:25 AM
2

Learn it, learn how to translate it and use it. That is operating according to her feelings.
/r/MensRights21/06/23 04:24 AM
10

...and this is the "humane" way.
/r/MensRights19/06/23 02:47 AM
19

"90% of refugees women and children" ...because the men from 15 to 50+ are forcibly prevented from fleeing so they can be pressed into military service. Man, talk about a disingenuous argument.
/r/MensRights15/06/23 07:14 PM
10

It was always hate, all the way back to Seneca Falls. Look at the earliest actions (literal terrorism) of the suffragettes in the U.K. Look at the white feather campaign, where women literally shamed men to their deaths in the trenches of ww1.
/r/MensRights14/06/23 04:44 PM
8

and they'll bitch about the pay not being equal, because for every 9-5 vet job working in A/C with puppies or at the zoo (state job with great benefits but not fantastic pay) there are 15 female grads, while livestock vets work 90+ hours a week with a waiting list and no takers for new jobs because ew, gross.
/r/MensRights14/06/23 02:15 PM
6

because they're shitty rude people and even online men somewhat respect the threat of violence.
/r/MensRights14/06/23 02:06 PM
8

Btw 13 of the 14 girls were in veteranary or equestrian🙄 ...but 90% of the equestrian ones will bail out of working with farm animals completely and won't work outside major population centers. Buddy of mine went livestock vet and despite his classmates being 90% female, the livestock vet game where he works (Texas) is 90% male. It's like MDs in Great Britain. Most grads and (state) emloyees are women, but they work less hours, won't work outside major metro areas, don't go for the more difficul…
/r/MensRights14/06/23 02:04 PM
4

against social workers, solicitors and garda the system protects itself, but look how many years and how many accusations it took against people in the system to actually impose a consequence.
/r/MensRights19/05/23 09:09 AM
91

so maybe it's almost never misogyny and people are just assholes?
/r/MensRights14/05/23 06:50 AM
3

...except women can opt out of responsibility at any point in the pregnancy/after birth, and men cannot. and you might want to look up the numbers on how many women don't pay child support in the rare case they lose custody, and the futility of trying to go through the insanely biased family court system to get it when they don't.
/r/MensRights13/05/23 03:04 AM
17

wait until she finds out boys get held liable for child support to their rapists.
/r/MensRights11/05/23 03:53 AM
2

their ineffective ability to control laws because they're doing so poorly in the courts, schools, income (women in most cities make more until they decide to have kids) and everything else. with legislation they've pushed, by the way. wake the fuck up and look at society.
/r/MensRights23/04/23 05:34 PM
2

what the hell are they winning from making this false claim? sympathy/attention from peers and family, safety from punishment from parents. also very possibly yes, they literally enjoy causing someone else pain with little to no risk to themselves if caught in their lies.
/r/MensRights12/04/23 05:16 PM
1

there is no such thing as hate speech however, under the definitions these morons use, it is 100% hate speech and a micro aggression
/r/MensRights12/04/23 05:09 PM
1

it's only a problem because women weren't assured maternity. they don't give two shits if men know or not. in fact if there is a doubt they will flat out lie to the potential father
/r/MensRights07/04/23 07:39 AM
3

hiding the fact that domestic violence was a two way street not just a two way street, but more heavily weighted on the opposite they say it is. highest rate of DV is lesbian couples lowest rate of DV is gay couples highest rate of non-reciprocal DV is female>male women are much more likely to use weapons and/or attack while the victim is sleeping/incapacitated that's all in the CDC study if you actually go look at the numbers and not just the synopsis and it doesn't even cover the women who str…
/r/MensRights27/03/23 09:57 PM
11

Yeah, not on board with the tone policing. QFT. It reeks of begging for scraps.
/r/MensRights21/03/23 03:24 AM
4

because they don't want equal pay for equal work. they want equal pay for doing what they want instead of what men do to earn it.
/r/MensRights19/03/23 02:12 AM
1

Women are attracted to tall, white, and athletic men. moneyed and with all their hair it's 5 boxes to tick, but it's still rare to see one that doesn't check them all off. even the guy that looks like a lumberjack is revealed to have made a killing on wall street before returning to the small town to get back to nature.
/r/MensRights07/03/23 11:46 AM
2

I 100% support it and am glad that more women can feel beautiful when they see someone that looks like them as a successful model. fuck this bullshit attitude. it's unhealthy when we say morbidly obese "models" are ok, much less attractive.
/r/MensRights07/03/23 11:42 AM
1

it should be the mandatory default.
/r/MensRights06/03/23 05:28 AM
10

google it, but be prepared to do some digging and read between the lines, because the feminists went full press trying to make this abusive cunt the victim and her abuse totally normal actions. a quick breakdown: he met Jada performing at a concert with her kids at this time he was the 21 year old best friend of her son Jaden he was addicted to Percocet and going through mental health issues at the time the Smiths "took him in" a pertinent quote from the abuser's mouth herself: “I guess about fo…
/r/MensRights23/02/23 10:15 PM
81

The world watched Will Smith listen to his wife tell him on live TV that she had an affair. groomed one of her kid's friends, with mental health and addiction issues
/r/MensRights23/02/23 03:06 AM
20

Doesn't seem like a lot of communication to me. until you realize how much more communication men are giving and women are getting than the reverse.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 10:48 PM
9

Some of the conclusions aren’t surprising. The “most attractive” women receive five times as many messages as the average female does, with 2/3 of all male messages going to the top 1/3 of women. And women tend to favor the most attractive men, though the ratio is less extreme. this is where statistics are misleading. you have to match first to get messaged, and women are almost never messaging first.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 10:48 PM
17

Then why did this singlehood gap not increase until recent years? the internet happened my bro. "dating" is now global. pretend it's the end of high school as everyone turns 18. the prom queen (10) no longer marries the prom king (who is no longer a 10, because he doesn't have money/power. to compare to older guys. he maxes out now at like a 7). now she gets flown out to Dubai (insert other trendy swimwear locale here) as soon as she turns 18. the court (9s) does too. the 7s and 8s get sugar dad…
/r/MensRights22/02/23 10:39 PM
2

yes, because factual information and statistics matter less than your feelings. /s
/r/MensRights18/02/23 11:54 PM
3

Younger females are more competent than their male peers in just about every category but sports, math and science. are they actually more competent or do they just get testing bias?
/r/MensRights18/02/23 01:01 PM
5

...of fucking course one of the mods on AskMen is a woman.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 09:30 PM
33

I contacted HR and they stated clearly that I have no option for compensation. HR is there to protect the company, not you. Protecting the company includes lying to employees about their chances at collecting if they sue said company.
/r/MensRights25/01/23 05:40 PM
1

either way I'm not registering to read something if I could read it, would I have typed that? it's either accept the paywall or register reddit account for 10 free articles, and I'm not doing either.
/r/MensRights25/01/23 03:15 AM
1

L.A. Times welcomes Reddit readers Redditors can unlock 10 free articles, no payment info necessary. Register to read more. maybe because you already have an account? either way I'm not registering to read something that should require none.
/r/MensRights24/01/23 10:24 PM
7

So she was grooming the boy, fucked raped him Why do people dance around this word when women rape boys, even in this sub? Also, gave him drugs and alcohol came before the raping. so she literally drugged him to remove his ability to consent, as if that matters when it's 28 vs 15.
/r/MensRights19/01/23 01:20 AM
166

UK:Mother-of-three, 28, who groomed a 15-year-old boy into a sexual relationship after plying him with cannabis and alcohol is spared jail bias? nah. this is totally believable: UK:Father-of-three, 28, who groomed a 15-year-old girl into a sexual relationship after plying her with cannabis and alcohol is spared jail Of course, that headline would be more like: UK:Father-of-three, 28, who groomed a 15-year-old girl into a sexual relationship and repeatedly raped her after plying her with cannabis…
/r/MensRights16/01/23 10:02 PM
21

the same way other feminists forum depict men. apparently you missed the dichotomy here. in case you also missed this whole-ass thread, we're talking about how men respectfully approaching women is called sexual assault if they aren't attractive, but literal sexual assault by women is glorified. so the comment you're replying to points out how actual sexual assault being glorified because it's women doing it to men is not in the same league as your average feminist sub (2X for example) post/comm…
/r/MensRights08/01/23 04:18 AM
1

Men have forgotten the art of communication with men, AS MEN! It wasn't forgotten, it was railroaded out as toxic and sexist and evil. Saying it was forgotten is absolving feminism and society of the crimes committed, and trying to pin the blame on men for somehow failing. We didn't fail, all forms of positive masculine reinforcement were and are being systematically eliminated.
/r/MensRights29/12/22 09:09 PM
27

People have forgotten how to communicate with each other. Especially men. bullshit. Men haven't forgotten how to communicate, society now expects men to communicate as women. Society teaches that men raising their voice is violence.
/r/MensRights29/12/22 01:02 AM
3

She had just gotten out of a toxic relationship with a former friend of mine Did you learn something? If not, I'll clue you in: Girls in "toxic relationships" are almost always AT LEAST equal contributors to the toxicity. Never be the rebound, and never try to save-a-ho.
/r/MensRights29/12/22 12:56 AM
0

that she man who got her pregnant nobody got her pregnant but her.
/r/MensRights29/12/22 12:46 AM
1

men are assumed to have full responsibility while women are assumed to have no responsibility. that's basically it.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 11:35 PM
25

Feminists think that behaviour like this is "empowering" but would be disgusted if it was a man doing it ...other than a man they want, in which case it's a best selling "romance bdsm" novel and movie.
/r/MensRights22/12/22 11:16 PM
1

because it's easy for women to get sex, but difficult for men. it's really not that damn complicated.
/r/MensRights03/12/22 12:42 AM
12

I don't even know what "retire with less income" is supposed to mean. It means they: made less over their lifetime so their social security payout is less (due to their own choices) saved less of their income in 401ks and the like for retirement (due to their own choices) spent longer unpaid or underpaid in their 20s (schooling vs. working) and had more debt tend to work jobs where they don't report all of their earnings (hairdressers, servers, bartenders, etc) don't claim it on taxes, don't get…
/r/MensRights01/12/22 06:45 PM
0

Like this isn’t a clear gender split when Kanye’s been so clearly acting out. Kim's no peach either but guess which side the media is gonna take? I'd be acting out too if I was denied access to my kids and everyone made me the bad guy.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 04:13 AM
1

the average guy's chances of being treated fairly in court. This is child support, not alimony. It' 100% shows how biased family court is that the default result is something absolutely stupid like 200k a month child support, regardless of how much you make. The default should be shared custody and no child support nor alimony. We're all equal, if you're accustomed to a standard of living either stay together or get a job. Child support in general is used as punitive alimony by another name. It …
/r/MensRights01/12/22 04:09 AM
5

I’m not a family law expert. And yet you're here pontificating on why an almost billionaire paying child support to an actual billionaire isn't punitive but is instead totally normal and fair. In California, child support is based off a formula that considers income and percent of time the parents have the child.
/r/MensRights30/11/22 07:04 PM
2

Is Kanye our hill to die on? Do you think he had a good lawyer? Do you think either of their speculative net worth means anything compared to the average person? You're looking at it all wrong. If Kanye is paying "child support" to a billionaire, what chance does the average guy have of being treated fairly in family court?
/r/MensRights30/11/22 06:20 PM
4

child support is based off a formula that considers income and percent of time the parents have the child. and who, pray tell, is likely to have child custody more often? is 50/50 custody the baseline or a rarity? if income determines support, does it go down as quickly as it goes up with a change in income?
/r/MensRights30/11/22 06:01 PM
3

Feminism. Except they’ve gotten slightly lost and went over the line too far that it has now become about “revenge” or “getting even” or “see how it feels”. It started out that way, way back to Seneca Falls, and it stayed that way throughout its history. Go look up "white feather girls" in the UK in ww1. Go look at how male college students vs. female college students in the Ukraine are being treated during their war with Russia. Look at the lies and hyperbole surrounding Prohibition in the US. …
/r/MensRights20/11/22 01:18 AM
9

for every person this is the clue you're missiing. they don't view straight white men as people.
/r/MensRights15/11/22 03:42 AM
7

A lot of male teachers obviously. the sub 20% of teachers that are male? I'm sure that has a huge impact.
/r/MensRights09/11/22 10:59 PM
31

but they'll take the (wrong) male gaze too until that gaze says hi, then it's rape... ...unless that gaze can help them move, or buys dinner and they're broke, or...
/r/MensRights09/11/22 10:56 PM
3

Hi, it sounds like you've picked up a stalker. In no particular order: record everything HR is not your friend or there to help, they are there to minimize risk to the company. they will 100% throw you under the bus as the easiest target. lawyer up, don't ask chat forums for legal advice. that's for lawyers. stop reacting at all to her comments/advances. any attention to a crazy eyed woman is good attention. on that note, block/remove/unfriend her on any and all social media.
/r/MensRights24/10/22 12:22 AM
1

yet the court pushes them away, and only cares about them when it comes to extracting money out of them because those kids without a nuclear family will statistically grow up to raise more dysfunctional kids, ensuring the funding for the family court system ad infinitum. once you realize that welfare is not designed to give people short term help into stable jobs but is instead designed to create and maintain an entire welfare class, it all makes more sense. things like a family of 3 or 4 losing…
/r/MensRights10/10/22 08:57 PM
2

If there’s ever a war, you’re gonna see a surge of female soldiers suddenly getting pregnant so they don’t have to fight. Mark my words. No war needed, just train hard. Pre-9/11 the average pregnancy rate for women assigned to Navy ships/USMC units more than tripled during the 6 month pre-deployment workups, then rose again on deployment. Source: I was in the USMC and good friends with the (Navy) Corpsmen and the Chaplain's assistant. His MOS was heavily dominated by female sailors yet every sin…
/r/MensRights06/10/22 09:14 PM
1

Your statement doesn't make sense. There is no alimony in my country. doesn't mesh with Im the only one that lost money from divorce as my ex husband was financially dependent on me. If there is no alimony, you're better off if your ex was dependent. If you were dependent and there is no alimony it makes sense. If your ex was dependent and you're now paying alimony, it makes sense. Unless you had a lot of assets and split, then ok, but long term you're still doing better unless you had much more…
/r/MensRights06/10/22 08:44 PM
7

Keep in mind that's almost guaranteed to be a low figure, because it ignores baby daddies with the same blood type as their putative father.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 05:24 PM
4

Due process is everything that happens vis a vis state actors (aka police, prosecution, etc) post allegation, not just in court. Ignoring the court of public opinion, the investigating officers had a duty to interview the suspect. They refused to do so.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 09:01 PM
12

Maybe read the article, or even look up "due process"? It's not just about court post hearing. Hiestand was removed from duty after being charged and was ordered to have no contact with the complainant and several of his co-workers at the air base in Moose Jaw, Sask. The military ordered him off the base and told him to work remotely.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 06:27 PM
1

I wonder at what age a child becomes a male and thus gets no support? in general, when puberty hits. most shelters start denying access to male children around 12. sometimes younger, sometimes they wait until 13 or 14, but in general once you hit that pre-teen year any chance of being a protected class is out the window for males.
/r/MensRights27/09/22 10:22 AM
12

I've heard some women I know talk about how they'd love a gay friend. Why does the orientation matter? Because they get all the male attention they want + validation for being an 'ally' + they never have to worry about putting him in the friend zone and rebelling against that.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 07:41 PM
2

even after their 12th kid is born and they’re broke beyond broke. if they had 12 kids, they won. even if they don't support them and they're a shit dad, they genetically won out over any number of childless billionaires.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 03:24 AM
2

then I am objectively sexualizing her against her will. no, you're assaulting her against her will if you are doing so. any comments, looking, filming, etc. are fair game, because they went near naked in a public place. some other points: you don't have a right to privacy in public, you don't have a right to have only people you want attention from give you attention. you have a right to be uncomfortable, but that right doesn't mean anyone making you uncomfortable has to care. you obviously have…
/r/MensRights23/08/22 09:41 PM
15

Being sexualized having any sexual interest shown by anyone they don't find attractive and/or can scam something from makes them feel really uncomfortable FTFY. BTW, nobody can 'sexualize' a grown adult except themselves.
/r/MensRights03/08/22 11:48 PM
12

Accountability without authority is slavery.
/r/MensRights20/07/22 09:08 PM
18

if committed knowingly. Why the caveat? How the fuck would it not be knowingly? Either you fucked more than one dude or you didn't, there isn't a grey area. If you fucked more than one dude, congrats, you knowingly committed fraud because you picked one at random to call baby daddy.
/r/MensRights20/07/22 09:04 PM
6

Usually when the perp is a woman they say ‘had sex’ with the minor. The exception to the rule of playing down female perps: the victim is a young girl.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 01:01 PM
1

How unusual to see the word "rape" being used when the perpetrator is a woman! When they out and out call it rape, there is a 100% chance the victim is a girl.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 12:59 PM
9

No. The few that are in those jobs already are the ones that want to be there. We don't need a bunch of quota workers who won't carry their weight and expect special treatment, and the job environment to change for their benefit.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 12:25 PM
6

Never, ever, ever talk to him like you're the adult and he's the child. I've seen so many marriages where this happens with women, sometimes without even having actual children. There is nothing more emasculating than a man's wife talking down to him and yet it's a common trope in media. See: Will/Jada Smith and how his kids treat him after being immersed in that their entire lives.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 07:35 AM
3

She also gave me a bloody nose at 9 years old but she felt bad about it so it was okay. /s Chances are she was abusing your older brother and he took it out on you.
/r/MensRights21/06/22 12:05 AM
1

For text, she got him incredibly drunk and even though he kept saying no, she got him so intoxicated to the point he couldn't say no and shagged her. This is why. Even in your post all about you telling the dude he was raped, you can't assign agency to the girl who raped him. Until we start holding women accountable as adults, we will get nowhere.
/r/MensRights21/06/22 12:03 AM
2

Men need to stop dating down and have some standards That's not a valid argument when women aren't interested in men that don't make at least 56% more than them.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 11:03 PM
1

Because those are by definition not successful men, the target audience for 99% of media is women, and women literally don't see men outside the top 10% in any given metric. It's why there is such cognitive dissonance when someone like Robin Williams suicides.
/r/MensRights05/06/22 02:52 PM
1

‘women only empathize with other women’ you do not address the fact that men also do the same thing. This is not really the case. Men have a strong outgroup preference for women over other men, based in the protector dynamic.
/r/MensRights22/05/22 03:10 AM
15

I have studied the origins of feminism at the University level during my sociology major, and I was delighted to learn about it back then. I'm appalled at the state of it today. Feminism isn't about women advocating for equality anymore, You were taught the sanitized version. The OG feminists were never fighting for equality, always "equality" amounting to special privileges without corresponding responsibility. Somebody in here has got to have the fantastically sourced comment by /u/girlwritesw…
/r/MensRights24/04/22 04:02 PM
7

If you have a history of hating X group, beefing with them, harassing them and then commiting the final crime why wouldn't it be an aggravating factor? those are already crimes. aggravated assault, stalking, harassment, etc. tacking on extra charges by calling something a hate crime leaves too much opening for redefining what a 'hate' crime is.
/r/MensRights17/04/22 05:00 AM
1

because it shifts the argument to you using the 'wrong' word choice. being upset with vocabulary means they can (somewhat ironically) dehumanize you and reduce your argument to 'this sexist pig can't even talk human'. that's basically it.
/r/MensRights11/04/22 09:18 PM
25

These same woman would have a fit and wouldn't believe you if you told them that Tom Cruise is 5'8"! Being fair, hollywood has spent literal decades trying to convince the world he's 6'+ using all the camera angles.
/r/MensRights01/04/22 12:16 PM
5

Would they still defend him had it been a female comedian he slapped for the joke? but to really watch them short circuit, drop this one: how about a FTM comedian?
/r/MensRights31/03/22 06:44 AM
1

It's not that men dont have rights, it's that women Don't have any responsibilities, while men take on theirs and women's.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 12:42 PM
4

Most people today are still reasonably fit No. Just look at the first two tables. 31% are overweight. 42% are obese. 9% are severely obese. That math doesn't leave much room for fitness. I rounded those numbers off. Only 19% are at or under normal weight. Even if you take away the entire 'overweight' category as being fit but too muscular for the BMI to work, the majority of the US is obese. And calling everyone who is overweight fit is a joke and a half.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 12:39 PM
10

A bunch of second and third hand sources pushing the same narrative. Did you actually look at the original source? The 'male standard' is a reasonably fit 40 year old 155lb man. You really think that's the actual 'male standard' average man in an office today?
/r/MensRights23/03/22 05:18 AM
18

For fuck sakes! All of these women are bringing blankets to work! When they could just as easily wear 100% equal business suits and not be cold? Nah, better to cry sexism. Which is easier and more sustainable: turn the AC to 80 degrees so one sex is comfortable (and computer systems run better, and people stay alert, which are the real reasons AC tends to be set low in offices) has to take more and more clothing off to be comfortable (oh wait can't do that, dress codes gonna dress code) leave th…
/r/MensRights23/03/22 05:15 AM
184

Feminism only thrives for air conditioned buildings. Then complains about them being set too low. Because the AC is sexist and discriminatory, not the dress code that's basically suits vs. anything you want to wear from suits to 'fancy' yoga pants and a sweatshirt to sundresses.
/r/MensRights22/03/22 02:38 PM
2

what do you think 'believe all women' is about?
/r/MensRights12/02/22 04:03 AM
2

girls setting off nuclear bombs should anyone nearby utter the word ‘booby’. Only if they didn't find that guy attractive, or if they did find him attractive but he turned them down.
/r/MensRights12/02/22 03:57 AM
1

Right? This dude's gonna raising his kids to think they deserve being abused.
/r/MensRights26/12/21 10:16 PM
8

Oh, you're that kind of troll. I don't feel sorry anymore.
/r/MensRights24/12/21 04:35 PM
9

I’ve been on the receiving end of misandry, and as a cis white dude I get it. Gonna take a while and showing the ones we raise as a children a while before things change. It’ll be a stigma for decades before it changes. Is it deserved? I’ve gotta say it is. Does it suck? Yeah it does. Oh man, I feel sorry for the abuse you've suffered.
/r/MensRights24/12/21 04:17 PM
1

When we lose a war to a non-woke civilization.
/r/MensRights15/12/21 07:36 PM
5

What sources would you consider "academic" exactly? ones that 100% agree with their personal beliefs, of course.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 04:00 PM
5

CDC’s nationally representative data revealed that over one year, men and women were equally likely to experience nonconsensual sex, and most male victims reported female perpetrators. Over their lifetime, 79 percent of men who were “made to penetrate” someone else (a form of rape, in the view of most researchers) reported female perpetrators. right, a CDC data breakdown is an opinion piece.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 03:59 PM
2

By not extracting it from the embryo. If you spent 30 seconds searching 'prenatal paternity test' you'd find out how.
/r/MensRights02/12/21 02:18 AM
10

paternity tests should be mandatory immediately upon birth at the first prenatal appointment It's noninvasive, inexpensive, and can be done at ~8 weeks.
/r/MensRights01/12/21 08:45 PM
2

No, you're thinking too deeply and too negatively towards the average (young women) feminist. Never explain by malice that which can be explained by stupidity. In this case it's not really stupidity, it's mental laziness. Feminism both in its roots and its entire history has been driven by and primarily for upper and upper middle class white women. They literally don't even see men below the top 10-20% of income/height/etc. They're making the mistake of thinking attraction is a mirror. What they…
/r/MensRights10/11/21 07:32 PM
19

when women were treated slightly worse in the 60s to 80s. They weren't treated slightly worse. They were treated differently.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 12:32 PM
3

You can't trust these self-reported surveys of hours spent doing household tasks whatsoever. An hour and 23 minutes of shopping a day give me a fucking break man. 2 hours cooking/cleaning a day? Riiiiight. How about a realistic breakdown: 2 hours cooking = 20 minutes prep, 20 minutes cleanup, plus 5 minutes in 30 second chunks checking on the pot/oven. During which she's also 'cleaning' (read: picking up after kids instead of telling them to do it) which is maybe vacuuming or pledging while watc…
/r/MensRights13/10/21 02:28 PM
31

"matchmaker" Why don't they just call her what she is? Pimp/madam.
/r/MensRights02/10/21 02:54 AM
55

They have all the agency. What they don't have is any of the responsibility.
/r/MensRights29/09/21 09:05 PM
25

Species responsibility They've never had responsibility. What they want is 100% authority, while still holding men 100% responsible.
/r/MensRights29/09/21 01:08 AM
1

That all sounds great, but it's just flat out of touch for current young men. For starters, there's a better than 50% chance you won't have this conversation with your son because you've been deliberately and with malice aforethought cut out of his life. Parental alienation all the way up to deliberately being sperm jacked unknowingly, with various levels of divorce and baby daddy and child support in between.
/r/MensRights23/09/21 04:03 PM
2

Oh believe me, I do, but I haven't been 20 in decades. Think back a bit to when you were 20. It's a hell of an ask to expect 20 year old guys to accept the current situation as it is. It's no surprise most of them can't be assed to bother.
/r/MensRights23/09/21 03:34 PM
15

we have all the time in the world to wait. I see this so often and I think it lacks any empathy at all to younger guys. It's easy to say this from your late 30s and 40s (I'm there) but it's not so easy to take. It didn't used to be like this, but social media combined with feminism has blown up the traditional sexual marketplace. Look at it from young guys' point of view for a second. I admit that's goddamn hard to do when you spend your 20s and early 30s being basically invisible to women you'r…
/r/MensRights23/09/21 05:19 AM
3

Prison time is a fantasy. I'd be satisfied with reversed child support and damages equivalent to what the man would get for the same amount of prison time.
/r/MensRights11/09/21 12:40 AM
1

That only works if the perp isn't more feminine than you are. See: how gay men and trans get treated by feminism. Either trumps straight males, but both get trumped by females.
/r/MensRights11/09/21 12:31 AM
5

Women used to be basically void of all rights before. They were litterally considered men's possession. Nope, try again.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 02:58 PM
6

It starts with the voice, it's pretty easy to tell. Rising inflection on the end of each sentence, makes your name sound like a question. When the voice comes out, you know you're about to be asked to do something against your best interest and/or something that isn't a fair deal.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 12:40 PM
1

How exactly would a household going from 1 income to 2 double increase housing costs? Because households didn't go from 1 to 2 incomes. We went from women living at home with parents until they got married to loads and loads of 1 bedroom apartments. And if you want to argue stats, provide some of your own. I provided plenty. I went 'basic economics' because you don't seem to understand how supply and demand work. More people going to the same schools and same jobs and same apartments = less pay,…
/r/MensRights30/08/21 04:58 PM
1

They literally doubled the workforce in less than a generation. Why would you think that didn't affect wages or education and housing costs? It's pretty basic supply/demand economics.
/r/MensRights30/08/21 04:26 PM
2

It's always amazing when the other side of the argument shows their ignorance without you having to say anything at all.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 11:18 PM
0

my point is the lack of empathy Like the lack of empathy apparent in labeling an entire generation professional victims lacking empathy?
/r/MensRights29/08/21 03:47 PM
2

He's not wrong though, not on a societal level. Giving voting rights without any reciprocal responsibilities was a mistake. See: catering to feelings over logic in every single election since. Putting women in the workforce on a mass scale (there were always women in the workforce) was a mistake. See: wage stagnation, plummeting birth rates, skyrocketing costs for education and housing.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 03:38 PM
12

Nope. Check the driving forces behind the white feather movement in the UK and prohibition in the US. The shaming and attempting to emasculate and equate men=children and women=adults goes all the way back to 1st wave. It is Not a new phenomenon.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 03:27 PM
-12

The .4 is either two early abortions or one mid-term miscarriage. Or if she's a super hoe, a whole combo pack of morning after pills.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 02:23 PM
16

If you have a strong stomach, go look up intersectional feminism. It's pretty much textbook Marxism mixed with feminism and critical race theory.
/r/MensRights07/08/21 06:08 AM
5

You out a date rape pill in my drink!" 90% of the time that accusation = I drank too much and regret my actions in the cold light of morning.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 02:14 PM
8

just about every one of them had an Onlyfans that they were ashamed of admitting they had and tried to hide the income they made behind other small jobs first. "I'm an entrepreneur." ...riiiiight.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 02:06 PM
36

Apparently so did the judge.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 03:39 PM
54

This doesn't seem like a mens rights issue this guy is an actual duechebag. The wifes probably not great either but sounds like she was dragged into this by him and didn't cause nearly as much damage. Not denying the guy was a douchebag, but what about this: '[Young] started the violence. Mrs Gardner intervened and she says she was bitten. There was evidence of head butting and punching. She started the fight and bit someone, threw punches and head butts, and got a suspended sentence for the sam…
/r/MensRights30/07/21 03:20 PM
1

Men have been stopping women from joining the military all these years I'm sorry, what? Women have been free to join the military since ww2. They just don't.
/r/MensRights25/07/21 09:12 AM
1

It's the reason we're called gen x in the first place.
/r/MensRights23/07/21 10:58 PM
1

wouldn’t those girls who weren’t picked just go back into the dating pool? making them available for men who aren’t part of that 10%? No. All the girls are all looking for relationships but they're just fucking that 10% of guys. The guys aren't getting in relationships, because why would you when 100% of girls are looking to hook up because they think it'll get them a relationship.
/r/MensRights23/07/21 10:57 PM
7

Sure, why not? Cosmetic companies are also experimenting with aborted and miscarried fetuses so why not? Can you not see the difference? Foreskins harvested (without the benefit of anesthesia or painkillers) from living human beings without their consent. They are quite literally maiming and torturing male children so old women can feel pretty.
/r/MensRights23/07/21 01:01 PM
2

On one hand they take any opportunity to portray vikings as incompetent, bumbling, henpecked fools, on the other hand they insert strong female characters in anythibg related to vikings. This is a deliberate, coordinated subversion. See: Thor's character arc across the marvel movies. Even when he's at his most awesome in Planet Hulk (aka Ragnarok) they still make him his own comic relief, and a strong independent woman has to save him. It gets worse in later movies.
/r/MensRights22/07/21 06:25 PM
1

many men take my compliment the wrong way and they think I’m trying to flirt with them. Because you might be the first to show interest in them as a person in a decade, much less compliment them.
/r/MensRights22/07/21 09:49 AM
21

Dude/dude. I'm a dude, he's a dude, she's a dude, we're all dudes.
/r/MensRights22/07/21 09:48 AM
5

Femelle rats kills their childs, daulphins rapes other daulphins, yet i'm not sure you would considere this "normal" behaviour for humans. Abortion and 50 shades of grey.
/r/MensRights20/07/21 12:16 AM
7

The fact that boobs are considered sexual is purely a social norm. Purely a social norm, right. Which is why no other primate mammal keeps enlarged breasts outside feeding their young.
/r/MensRights19/07/21 11:12 PM
10

Unfortunately, men see boobs as sexual Biology isn't unfortunate, it just is. We need to stop apologizing for normal damn behavior.
/r/MensRights19/07/21 09:43 PM
3

The question should be why less males are applying for university? Quite a lot of reasons. Hatred of school? Why would boys hate school after being treated like defective girls for a dozen or so years? It's not like they removed all male focused subject material and classes, either, right? Fear of allegations? Why would boys opt out of losing thousands of dollars, their entire social reputations, and possibly freedom because a drunken hookup regretted it a couple weeks later after her boyfriend …
/r/MensRights19/07/21 02:44 AM
7

There's no clear explanation for why. Biological imperatives. There's nothing sinister about it. Go back hundreds of thousands of years, and the women who could more easily accept being absorbed into a tribe that won a battle and killed all the males reproduced. The ones that couldn't didn't. The men who accepted more women into their tribe instead of killing them off reproduced more than men who didn't. Repeat for tens of thousands of years. It's why women are more prone to stockholm syndrome, …
/r/MensRights19/07/21 02:36 AM
27

90% of the donation end up being spent on advertisement. Through a marketing company just coincidentally owned by the charity CEO's wife, or cousin, or brother in law.
/r/MensRights11/07/21 02:06 PM
4

but in the end it is his kid and the kid is taken care of by her so child support is a given. Funny, it doesn't work like that the reverse.
/r/MensRights11/07/21 09:05 AM
13

Objectifying actually means: Someone I don't find attractive finds me attractive.
/r/MensRights06/07/21 10:53 AM
0

Did you even read my comment?
/r/MensRights05/07/21 06:29 AM
14

Eh, I don't know about the lazy part. They're working and making money too, and that's a good reason to not want to have to do all the housework too. That's just a damn myth. They magically select away what counts as housework, I've seen it in my sisters and their husbands. They also massively overestimate how long and how time intensive things like laundry are.
/r/MensRights05/07/21 04:39 AM
8

the alphabet mafia, because a woman that likes other women is a lesbian You actually rank higher than women in the oppression olympics as a non-binary or 'pre-surgery' trans woman.
/r/MensRights02/07/21 03:27 AM
4

Thank you! I also thought that the fact that misandry seems much more common in social media than irl Tell that to the courts, to the school systems, and to employers. Because the facts don't support that.
/r/MensRights02/07/21 03:23 AM
6

The elites didn't bank roll feminism till the 1970s. You might want to go read some history. The first waves were almost entirely wealthy women pushing the feminist agenda. What changed in the 1970s wasn't elites suddenly bankrolling feminism. What changed in the 1970s? women got access to birth control no fault divorce became common the welfare handout to single mothers went into overdrive Up until those boxes got checked off, average women actually had to at least pretend to cooperate with ave…
/r/MensRights02/07/21 03:21 AM
14

almost Every school shooter has one thing in common Correct. But it's not this, this is just the symptom: They spend half their lives in a psychiatrist's office and take a couple dozen pills. The root cause is that they mostly come from fatherless homes.
/r/MensRights28/06/21 07:57 PM
4

This is one of those studies that has conclusions so obvious it's like saying water is wet. I did however take some exception to this sheet anchor they tossed out: It is however not true that most therapists are feminists. While this study did find that therapists leaned sightly left on average, most therapists and psychologists reject feminism, patriarchy theory, and masculinity as "just" a social construct. Despite the popularity of feminism in the social sciences, the field of psychology has …
/r/MensRights28/06/21 07:48 PM
5

Little boys suffering = no one gives a shit mother's choice based on what she prefers aesthetically FTFY
/r/MensRights28/06/21 07:44 PM
1

happens to be in a position of influence and power both financially and his job gives him some credibility
/r/MensRights28/06/21 12:58 PM
-1

Shaming language, apologetic nature, getting emotional because someone disagreed with you? You can't make this shit up. How about just this: Men act like men because at a very base genetic level that's how men are. I said you were self deprecating because you're offering excuses and qualifying your statement, and don't appear to have even noticed you were doing so.
/r/MensRights27/06/21 11:34 PM
6

We do so because at a very base genetic level we haven't evolved much since prehistoric times. Please stop the self-deprecation. Women haven't evolved much either, but this apologetic anchor tossed out makes it sound like that's both a problem and that said problem is our fault. It's not. We are different, and that's not a bad thing. It just is.
/r/MensRights27/06/21 05:10 AM
16

How that got twisted into feminists thinking it’s a common phrase used to justify rape or sexual assault is beyond me. It's 100% deliberate. It's taking a harmless phrase that is a literal descriptor "boys behave like boys, they don't behave like girls and you don't have the experience to understand that" and turning it into a negative. It's attempting to equate natural male child behavior with extremely anti-social behavior. It's a deliberate attempt to dehumanize and villainize any normal and …
/r/MensRights27/06/21 05:04 AM
3

She's taught you that it's ok to lie and cheat in college, when you haven't even started your own path. You're doing her work, carrying her weight, and you should be focused on growing into being a man. You offering to do her assignment was right and honorable, because you're a young man learning responsibility. You were being a good son, your hear was in the right place but you made a mistake. Your mom was not, however, being a good mom. Accepting your offer to do her assignment was a childish,…
/r/MensRights25/06/21 09:04 AM
6

My mom is studying sociology. She wants to work with kids. For starters, my dude, I'm sorry that this is gonna sound harsh but it's coming from a place of love. It sucks that your mom is abusing you. Yes, your mom is abusing you. She's taking advantage of you for her own benefit, which is the exact opposite of what a parent is supposed to do for their children. And this right here is why we have the problems we do. A fucking mother has trained her son that it's ok to put his effort into furtheri…
/r/MensRights24/06/21 10:57 PM
7

It should be mandatory at before birth. Paternity tests before birth are safe, fast, and reliable. They should 100% be required and automatically taken as part of the basic pregnancy screening. The test can be performed as early as the 7th week of pregnancy, meaning you can choose to confirm who the father is nearly immediately after your pregnancy is confirmed. Unlike outdated methods for determining paternity like amniocentesis or a CVS (Chorionic Villus Sampling) test that can cause a miscarr…
/r/MensRights19/06/21 06:22 PM
8

the school system allowing fostering and encouraging this behaviour.
/r/MensRights17/06/21 10:47 PM
26

limitations being placed on him If the same limitations aren't placed on the female workers, that's easily a hostile work environment. He's being tried and convicted of being a pedo before the fact, not just to staff but to clients. Just look at the simplest restrictions that are common for male staff vs. female staff: can't be alone in a room with the kids but female staff can can't escort kids to restrooms can't work with toddlers/babies he's never going to be asked to open/close, because of t…
/r/MensRights12/06/21 05:32 PM
1

Also, most innocent people don't run from the cops, Go look up fight or flight instinct, thanks. It's also why people fight when put in a choke hold or get confronted by aggressive officers with hands on their weapons.
/r/MensRights10/06/21 01:45 AM
9

All men should have the right to paternity testing Paternity testing should be required before birth, period. They have 99% accurate noninvasive tests that can be done after 8 weeks into pregnancy.
/r/MensRights01/06/21 05:24 AM
1

That's half of why I said that. The other half comes from working in the service industry, where I've seen exactly what I described. Guys never allowed to work together because it would cut into the not doing side work and swapping kegs and taking trash out shifts of the female employees. Even office jobs with mostly girls have the one guy stuck with shit work like inventorying supply closets.
/r/MensRights25/05/21 01:37 PM
1

Out of a staff of 20 servers there were 2 males and they never worked the same shift as each other that way they could do the heavy lifting for the ladies when needed. Read this more as 'so there is always a shift where women can avoid the shit work and managers don't have to do it' than men happily volunteering.
/r/MensRights24/05/21 09:50 PM
12

...and about half women, and it's almost always a family member/friend of the family, not some random stranger in public.
/r/MensRights18/05/21 09:24 PM
3

No, he was forced to be a father twice. By act of rape and then again by act of court.
/r/MensRights18/05/21 05:21 AM
9

...sooooo it wasn't legal? That's my whole point here. The OP says a woman can legally force a man to be a father. A woman can force a man to be a father, but it is still illegal to do so. His 'fatherhood' was legally enforced, which is the point he made that you somehow missed. He wasn't absolved of responsibility because he was raped, he was financially punished years after the fact to support his rapist. Here is the part you somehow missed: the father, a fucken child, ordered to pay child sup…
/r/MensRights17/05/21 11:46 PM
4

She always told me when I was younger she wishes I was gay because i’d be “so much more fun”. Both my sisters are the same way. BLM, ACAB, extremely outspoken belligerent. She doesn't hate you, she just doesn't see you as a person. She wishes you were a better accessory to her life. She's only a couple years old but treats you like she's an adult and you're a child? She's an actor performing a role, not an adult. The word gets tossed around too much but she is acting very narcissistic.
/r/MensRights07/05/21 01:29 AM
10

So the people in this study are pointing out how far behind boys are in school. That goes from literally kindergarten to university. Women earn more than men now until they decide to have kids and drop out of the career path. Yet one of the researchers has to throw out a sheet anchor saying essentially 'but women still have it worse lol we're not misogynists really, please don't cancel us' instead of actually addressing the issue. Read his whole comment, it's a laundry list of feminist talking p…
/r/MensRights07/05/21 12:24 AM
18

Many (including us, as it happens) would also argue that later in life, men are advantaged relative to women. The level of cognitive dissonance it takes for this statement is unreal. They're quite literally looking the evidence that it's not and can't possibly be true in the face and still preaching the party line.
/r/MensRights06/05/21 04:34 PM
5

It worked for large societies as well, until we dismantled male only spaces It's why the old money isn't doing as badly, because they still have old boys clubs. It's why women are drawn to bad boys, drug dealers, sports stars, etc. They still have male only spaces, even if some of those aren't healthy places either.
/r/MensRights04/05/21 11:51 PM
331

thousands of dollars Add a 'hundreds of' in front of that. Even if his child support was only $500 a month, that's over $100k.
/r/MensRights04/05/21 11:46 PM
3

Because women quite literally don't even see men under the top 10-20%. They don't exist to them.
/r/MensRights03/05/21 12:43 AM
10

I don't think consent should even be a topic that is discussed with young 5 year old kids. It depends on what you mean by consent. Do you need to get into the nitty gritty? No. Should you teach your child they have the right to decline touching like hugs and kisses from anyone as they wish? Yes. What sex they or the person they're declining bodily contact with is irrelevant. Most molestation is from family and close family friends. If you teach your children early that they have the right to not…
/r/MensRights19/04/21 09:04 PM
14

Because when you're used to privilege equality looks like oppression, and most women totally lack any empathy at all towards men. You yourself only notice because it concerns passing on your genes to the next level through your sons. Women never lost their traditional rights and privileges despite being freed from their traditional responsibilities, while simultaneously gaining all of men's traditional rights without any of the corresponding responsibilities. We have basically turned young women…
/r/MensRights19/04/21 10:14 AM
13

So, reparations?
/r/MensRights17/04/21 10:06 PM
1

No, you talked around the question and answered questions I didn't ask. You got defensive about it, saying it's a career and not a hobby. To me that says you're used to not being treated equally to female teachers and in denial of that fact.
/r/MensRights10/04/21 08:30 AM
1

Friends and family in the teaching profession, in multiple districts and states. The rest of this I'm not gonna counter, because again you're being disingenuous. I asked quite specific questions and you're trying to dismiss my points with this nonsense: I also expanded on your last question beyond your original query to try and comprehensively answer your question, but apparently that isn't enough to answer your vague hypothetical scenario. I didn't take exception to expansion, I took exception …
/r/MensRights10/04/21 05:45 AM
5

I'll say that your experiences are not the norm, at least in the US. Your answer to the last question is just disingenuous. You know damn well I was referring to counselling as in a one-on-one teacher-student interaction, not a specific job title.
/r/MensRights10/04/21 05:16 AM
6

Upvoting for honest discussion so this doesn't get buried. Then there's the "you'll be accused of rape or pedophilia" comments. I've never had anyone say that to me, or any of my other male co-workers. Feels like a straw man argument. What level do you teach? Do you have the same rules as female teachers? Are you allowed to hug a sad child? Can you assist them in the bathroom if they soiled themselves and need help? Would you have a one-on-one counselling session with a female student in a room …
/r/MensRights10/04/21 04:21 AM
8

-refuse to treat boys as boys and instead as misbehaving girls and then get shocked when maybe young boys need male teachers who understand them better- Or maybe even just enough male colleagues who can tell them what they're doing wrong, and have that knowledge respected and accepted.
/r/MensRights10/04/21 04:04 AM
4

Appalling but not surprising.
/r/MensRights07/04/21 01:43 PM
1

No one looks at teachers as some higher authority figure or a leader. Except for, you know, the kids in their formative years in those classes under the authority of those teachers.
/r/MensRights02/04/21 11:49 PM
9

I'm no doctor but how is cutting a body part off someone drugged so they won't wake up and leaving an open wound bleeding not attempted murder?
/r/MensRights02/04/21 02:10 PM
2

Fair, but most of the time I see female teacher/female student it's called rape. The least it gets called is sexual assault.
/r/MensRights29/03/21 01:06 PM
4

No, women can rape other women, it's not when the perpetrator has a penis. They'll call it rape when a female teacher rapes a girl. But the second the victim has a penis it magically becomes something else.
/r/MensRights28/03/21 04:31 PM
11

Women are fucking horrible to one another, but not openly or in public. Behind the back of whoever they're talking shit about, in public or not. As long as that person isn't physically present, they'll do it openly as hell. Virtually too, they'll just cut that person out of the group chat to do it.
/r/MensRights28/03/21 01:33 AM
8

When you're used to privilege equality seems like discrimination.
/r/MensRights27/03/21 06:43 PM
58

Then you aren't reading between the lines. Someone doesn't have to tell you right out that they're a sexist. Their actions are as loud as their words. Or the lack thereof. Consider this: one sex working at one of the largest social media outlets has an officially sanctioned and supported employee voice the other sex not only doesn't have one, they've been reduced to 'allies' of the other
/r/MensRights27/03/21 05:07 PM
3

You don't even have to go to the war analogy. Just ask them if we should combine the LPGA/PGA, WNBA/NBA, and NCAA men's and women's sports, with spots open only to ability. That backpedal is lightning fast.
/r/MensRights21/03/21 11:03 PM
3

The US has been the 'great satan' since the 70s. Longer than that, but that's how long the term goes back. Anyplace where US power replaced the Brits and anyone else post WW2. That goes with being a super power. We've been the target of bombings and hijackings and everything else since modern terrorism started. For that matter, Jihad against non-believers has been going literally since the founding of Islam. How do you think it became one of the world's largest religions?
/r/MensRights20/03/21 04:34 AM
2

But to do that we'd have to hold Saudi Arabia accountable. What's the likelihood of that, with their ties to both the Bush and Clinton dynasties, among others?
/r/MensRights20/03/21 04:22 AM
2

9/11 was the fault of the US training Afghanis in the 80s Right, because all 19 were from Afghanistan and there was no Islamic terror before or after that. Wait, what that isn't right? Let's check: 15 of the 19 were from Saudi Arabia the other 4 all from bordering countries they were all Wahhabis Wahhabism is deeply tied to the House of Saud. Bin Laden? Rubs elbows with Saudi royalty before he decides to get deep into terrorism. Why? His family made their fortune via exclusive contracts to build…
/r/MensRights20/03/21 03:34 AM
2

it should be Logic has no power in a world of feelings and holier-than-thou people practicing 'do as I say, not as I do' as a religion.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 09:09 PM
3

Yeah totally ignore the difference in bone structure, that's just learned behavior.
/r/MensRights01/03/21 03:41 PM
31

https://anatomypubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ar.23552 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3217425/ https://cha.horse/saddle-fit-differences-between-men-and-women/ https://www.keilhauer.com/site_Files/Content/research-pdfs/GenderBasedInfluences.pdf There's more, google is your friend. Although beware the bias of the search, if you look for anything like 'men vs. women seated' you get spammed by manspreading bullshit opinion pieces.
/r/MensRights01/03/21 02:24 AM
69

or sitting with our legs apart. Because our hip joints and pelvis are mechanically different from women's.
/r/MensRights28/02/21 10:00 PM
1

“it’s literally just a phrase calm down” Go look up gaslighting for me and tell me if how they treated you for asking an honest question sounds like it checks that box.
/r/MensRights17/02/21 08:03 PM
5

The boys, however, did not have the solidarity to complain as a group. Because the boys know damn well it doesn't matter if they complain, they're gonna get their legitimate concerns dismissed. See: female reporters in sports locker rooms.
/r/MensRights15/02/21 03:43 PM
9

How does that saying go again? When you're accustomed to privilege, equality feels like discrimination. Just the usual have-their-cake-and-eat-yours-too of feminism.
/r/MensRights15/02/21 03:39 PM
11

Honestly, how did modern day progressives miss this one? Because it's at a progressive school, and rich white liberals are allowed to be racist. The rich and liberal overrides the white and racist.
/r/MensRights07/02/21 08:14 PM
10

They had female adolescence until they hit the wall and got upset men don't hit the wall the same way.
/r/MensRights05/02/21 07:41 PM
7

Because it's government subsidized?
/r/MensRights02/02/21 07:43 PM
19

they want equal privileges They don't even want that. They want to keep any special privileges they have while also getting men's, while dodging men's responsibilities and also losing theirs.
/r/MensRights02/02/21 06:53 PM
5

I'll just say that while I was in an all male unit, my buddies from MOS school weren't. When they were prepping for deployment and then through deployment women would 'oops, I got pregnant' at around a 50% rate. So for any given MOS, the more women in it, the harder the men get it. The men have to deploy more often and when they deploy they do so short handed more often in direct proportion to the number of women in the unit.
/r/MensRights02/02/21 06:50 PM
1

Your ex is manipulative fuck, and you need a lawyer. No further contact with or about her that isn't at their advice. Don't take advice from us or anyone else that isn't 'get a lawyer and do what they say', because in the end that's the only advice that matters. My ex after she broke up with me started saying to her friends that I raped her and that used to call her a hoe Ok, so lie #1, so why would you trust this one: but she's not going to the cops Or even entertain this one: she said that she…
/r/MensRights01/02/21 03:27 PM
2

I mean neither is incorrect when describing 90% of POS systems.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/02/21 02:50 PM
117

Or Point of Sale, because for damn sure they're only in it for the benefits.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/01/21 01:34 AM
1

Hollywood is long known for this shit. As long as you mouth the right platitudes they worship you despite anything, including raping a fucking child (Roman Polanski).
/r/MensRights30/01/21 04:45 PM
6

Screaming and moaning like they're getting railed, every time they hit the ball. It's so fucking weird.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/01/21 02:54 AM
3

I've long been confused why women get paid exactly the same in tennis. In the absolutely longest women's games possible, they are playing the same tennis amount as the shortest possible men's games. It's not about the work they do, it's about the audience they draw. Women's tennis is inferior but more understandable for the average watcher as they actually have volleys back and forth much more often than men's tennis. Because of this it has a draw equal to men's tennis, so they get paid the same…
/r/PussyPassDenied24/01/21 06:58 AM
12

When your a kid school seems like the world. When you're a kid school is your world. You're there most of your waking time from the age of reason to young adulthood. Her power was microscopic and the grand scheme. But her power in that world is immense, and how she treated you was quite literally abusive.
/r/MensRights15/01/21 03:37 PM
1

Fair enough.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/01/21 03:10 PM
1

The original budget was ~50k and they used maybe half that shooting, iirc costs didn't go past the original budget until post-production and they got an influx of cash after smaller film festival showings and they upped the editing prior to Sundance. I haven't actually seen the playmate talking smack, but it just sounds bitter, like she's upset she isn't making more despite spending more money. I don't think any e-thots are actually working, they're getting paid to wank off on camera or even jus…
/r/PussyPassDenied14/01/21 04:52 PM
3

I wouldn’t watch a movie that was shot without a tripod and the audio sounded like it came from $2 gas station headphones, even if it was “good” You might not, but you aren't the entire market. Blair Witch Project ticks all of those boxes and it made like a quarter of a billion dollars. It was terrible, but some people like terrible. Terrible production can actually make a movie better. See: evil dead 1 vs. evil dead 2, and my personal favorite Army of Darkness. Production can be terrible and it…
/r/PussyPassDenied14/01/21 04:27 PM
11

I haven't been on any onlyfans or similar cam site ever because fuck paying for free content, but just because something has higher production value doesn't make it superior. Even higher attractiveness of the models isn't necessarily going to make it superior. Past a certain point of 'yeah I'd do her', it doesn't even really matter. There's a reason amateur porn took off in the early 2000's, and it wasn't production value.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/01/21 03:45 PM
5

This has been driven by capitalism in the school system My only argument with your entire statement is that it's not driven by capitalism, it's driven by socialism in the school system. If the federal government wasn't guaranteeing shitty loans while not allowing them to be dodged via bankruptcy like any other loan, we wouldn't have half the problems we have.
/r/MensRights18/12/20 04:29 AM
2

If a class of people can dodge a responsibility at will, they aren't actually holding any responsibility. They are doing so as long as it suits them, and no longer.
/r/MensRights12/12/20 07:24 AM
2

That's a bullshit forced-birther line. Is it really though? Let's do a quick google search and check the first link, shall we? You can only get an abortion after 12 weeks in the event of a medical emergency Ok, fact checking time. Since I'm in the US and everyone agrees we're evil people trying to force women to bear unwanted children, we'll check there first. Shockingly, it appears that your claim isn't even true for one single state in the US. Man do I love me some infographics. Check out that…
/r/MensRights12/12/20 07:17 AM
3

Leaving aside the ad hominem attacks on me, is English your first language? Please use a spell check, it actually hurts trying to read your post. The grammar is bad but the spelling is atrocious. are you now at the same time saying women have NO RESPONIBLITY for babies or pregnancy etc Yes, I'm effectively saying exactly that, because they don't actually have to hold that responsibility. Women have multiple effective non-surgical birth control methods vs. condoms or the snip for guys. If that's …
/r/MensRights12/12/20 06:12 AM
3

This is kinda random Segway... its a valid point, though. That wasn't random though. That was a direct response to this nonsense you spouted: they dont have periods like girls do at such a young age and can get pregnant which forces girls to be responsible very quickly. Which is just provably untrue.
/r/MensRights12/12/20 05:19 AM
2

do you think that feminists are so worried about men being able to defend themself because they are afraid that men will use it as a justification like they do? Yes. Most of the shit they claim 'the patriarchy' does is exactly what they do any chance they get.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen11/12/20 05:10 AM
7

First Wave feminisim was noble as fuck, No it wasn't, feminism was always about something for nothing. It's always been about rich entitled white women wanting to have their cake and eat it too. Look at what quite a lot of 1st wave feminists were the major push behind. The white feather campaign, prohibition, ad nauseum. I had the link someplace where Karen Straughan lays it all out with a bombard of studies and research, but I can't find it at the moment. Feminism has always been about gaining …
/r/FeminismStopsWhen11/12/20 05:05 AM
24

But she said "No, don't tell them. Then they'll expect us to give them stuff." And that right there is feminism in a nutshell. Telling everyone how valuable women are so we'll give them stuff.
/r/MensRights26/11/20 04:20 PM
5

I'm not saying she was manipulating you with the tears, but she was at least partially manipulating you with the tears. It's good you still had the wherewithal to fire her despite that manipulation.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/11/20 03:10 PM
41

To be fair, it’s extremely uncommon. But is it though? The cognitive dissonance is real. Here're your example. Your female employee said the interactions were reciprocated and it was more of a consensual sexual relationship with multiple male employees. but they: had digital or physical evidence to the contrary. and you actually saw that evidence with your own eyes. he was obviously attempting to make the interaction stop, he was visibly distressed and physically removing her hand from his genit…
/r/PussyPassDenied26/11/20 06:28 AM
1

You're not an asshole and you're not wrong, but you aren't gonna win that argument because she's arguing from feelings and not logic. Women's national Olympic teams get beaten on the regular by boys under 15 clubs. Not boy's national under 15 teams, just insert random city name here clubs. Testosterone is a hell of a drug, and once boys hit puberty their strength, speed, agility, etc. just take off on a geometric curve compared to women. Not just physically but mentally. Even young teenage boys …
/r/MensRights23/11/20 12:01 AM
1

Its not that complicated and although my wording may be off nowhere did i say that it would be of his own recognizance. Dont put words in my mouth. But I didn't though, you did. New petition for Johnny Depp to prosecute Amber Heard for assault and The goal of this petition is to pitch the idea to Johnny Depp of prosecuting Amber for assault in a criminal court. It's up to the state, not Johnny Depp.
/r/MensRights19/11/20 04:49 AM
4

You're an idiot. You really think people can just prosecute on their own recognizance? How do you think criminal law works? What do you think the chances are of a prosecutor taking a case where they already lost a much easier civil suit?
/r/MensRights19/11/20 12:27 AM
15

I think issues such as voting rights and equality of opportunity are important, and the women who fought for those back in the day were very brave for doing what they did. You might want to go actually look up the history of universal male and universal female suffrage, and what each sex had to do to secure it in various nations. One sex was brave, one sex shamed the brave one into giving them 'equal rights' without any corresponding responsibilities.
/r/MensRights12/11/20 03:45 PM
4

Because they don't know what responsibility looks like.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 04:13 PM
62

I just attempted to have this argument with a former co-worker on facebook. She posted some infographic about a WNBA player vs. LeBron, similar win rates/titles etc. but Lebron makes $40 mil and she makes like $250k. I posted an actual monetary breakdown of how much they each make in comparison to what their team makes and is worth, pointing out that the Lakers have a revenue stream 7 or 8 times as large as the entire WNBA, and that's why he gets paid more. The WNBA averages between 5-10k seats …
/r/MensRights21/10/20 01:59 PM
2

in a serious relationship. Reading comprehension is key. by a woman I've never met before.
/r/MensRights19/10/20 04:40 AM
1

That's why so many boys do well at STEM - when there's right and wrong answers the bias doesn't matter, so boys focus on the classes where they find they can actually have a fair shot. 100%
/r/MensRights19/10/20 03:21 AM
16

But it doesn't though. You're brushing off valid concerns by 'but what about'-ing, calling it a dual issue. OP is calling out the bias of how sexual assault/rape are handled in the courts as a gender specific issue (because it is one) and your entire post is saying 'this isn't ok for either side'. Talk about divide and distract.
/r/MensRights11/10/20 03:44 AM
50

This is neither a feminist nor men’s rights issue. But it is a men's right issue when female sexual aggression towards men isn't even acknowledged, much less treated the same as male sexual aggression towards women. This in many allegedly 1st world countries' legal systems. It gets worse when you look at how often female predators are let off the hook, both socially and legally, especially when their targets are minors.
/r/MensRights11/10/20 01:18 AM
7

And? Flip the script, and the dude would get attacked by half the people in range, before the laugh track could catch up.
/r/MensRights08/10/20 10:11 PM
3

Society is continually sending the message that being a man is wrong, Not just wrong, it's worse than that. They're sending the message that men (aside from that top 10% women are attracted to) are defective women. See: 'men should be able to cry and express their emotions' and other feminist attempts at blaming men's problems solely on men.
/r/MensRights07/10/20 05:37 PM
2

the only male issue they post about is "men should cry too, let men cry" because it's not a male issue, they're trying to make men into defective women.
/r/MensRights03/10/20 07:23 PM
21

It's pretty natural for most people to have that reaction. Keep in mind they don't let moms and dads in to see that procedure being performed in hospitals. All the facts about how much pain is suffered and how much sensation is lost for life don't matter, because they're downplayed and you get 'man up' hate spammed at you and you're labeled as a misogynist if you raise it as an issue. Circumcised men almost universally have no basis for comparison to being uncircumcised, because they never had t…
/r/MensRights30/09/20 07:43 PM
38

Shit like this always makes me laugh. I've never been told to 'man up' by another man, even total assholes. It's only ever been toxic women.
/r/MensRights12/09/20 08:09 PM
2

And you didn't get my main point. If you cut population by half, a lot of those skilled jobs go away too. No reason for them if your consumer base dropped by 50%.
/r/MensRights01/09/20 03:58 PM
1

So they're gonna just kill off all the low skill workers. Right. And we've never been in a situation where technology advanced and a bunch of jobs were lost while overall productivity went up. Nope. No chance of peaceful outcomes, people retraining, or different new jobs appearing seemingly out of nowhere. Industrial revolution didn't happen. Tech revolution didn't happen.
/r/MensRights01/09/20 03:54 PM
1

I mean your scenario of doom is entertaining and all, but reducing the population does nothing to fix it. Even dropping population by half doesn't suddenly make the half that's left trained for the jobs that are left. Reduce the population and a lot of those skilled jobs go away too.
/r/MensRights01/09/20 03:34 PM
2

People cant control if they're a victim of abuse. Yes and no. It happens once? Not your fault. You keep seeking it out and you're on your 5th baby daddy? At least partially Your fault.
/r/MensRights01/09/20 05:01 AM
16

Yeah, a classic case of grooming and abusing a position of authority/respect. But she's just living her best life. /s
/r/MensRights31/08/20 02:53 PM
72

Not even close. It would have been bad enough if she just broke his heart. She staged a surprise takeover of his show just to gloat about it and how unrepentant she is for cheating on him.
/r/MensRights31/08/20 06:54 AM
85

And which would you rather do? Be arrested and have to post bail, or get a notice and be allowed to go home and come to the station later?
/r/MensRights18/08/20 02:53 PM
14

He's talking bicycle, not motorcycle.
/r/MensRights17/08/20 05:16 AM
35

Because the author of this comic literally cannot even acknowledge the possibility that women can do wrong.
/r/MensRights16/08/20 07:59 PM
0

If every single male engineer/IT worker hadn't gone through school/internship/hiring watching less qualified female candidates get handed scholarships/the best internships/jobs over himself and/or other better qualified male colleagues, they wouldn't assume they know more and they might treat the diversity hires with equal respect. Sometimes the discrimination is so bad that it gets to the point of an internship/job opportunity not even considering male candidates. But they do, so they don't. It…
/r/PussyPassDenied09/08/20 04:10 AM
12

Because playing them gives them a challenge that they can't get playing any female competition. You don't play people you can beat to get better, you play people you can't beat.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/08/20 05:50 PM
19

Both, and others, to boys u-15s, and on the regular.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/08/20 04:28 PM
38

Yeah the lower ability combined with lower teamwork make stuff impossible to watch. Someone posted on another thread in here about lowering the rim and shrinking the 3 pt line, that stuff might help but it's doubtful. Watching soccer especially, seeing them struggle with things high school boys teams do on the regular is just angry-making. Like dudes, you're getting paid to do this. Go practice or something.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/08/20 03:28 PM
70

Tennis. Their lower athletic skill makes the game equally as or more entertaining to watch than the men's game. MMA has a big draw too.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/08/20 03:19 PM
4

And no abusive female partner has ever called the cops on her victim, male or female. Nope. Not once.
/r/MensRights07/08/20 04:02 PM
15

At least when you talk to them on the phone, the agent doesn't care if you're a man they will give you an honest assessment of the situation you're in. Bullshit. Honest assessment? Sure, except the agents who hear a male voice and automatically put you to the abusers box. And the agents who actually deign to look for support for you and are genuinely (ha!) surprised to find that no shelters will take you, or if a male shelter even exists in your state they won't take your kids too. And that hone…
/r/MensRights27/07/20 10:31 PM
26

Read the last link through. They literally won't even acknowledge even the possibility of a female perpetrator with a male victim. The majority of domestic violence stories covered by the media are about male perpetrators and female victims who are typically in heterosexual relationships. While we certainly don’t want to minimize this violence, focusing on only one type of situation renders invisible the many scenarios that do not fit this definition, including abusive relationships among homose…
/r/MensRights27/07/20 09:29 PM
113

No, they want more than that. They want all of their traditional benefits, with none of their traditional responsibility. That's pretty much already happened. They also want all of men's traditional benefits, with none of the men's responsibilities. And that's not good enough either. Then they want men to lose their traditional benefits but keep their responsibilities, add women's responsibilities, and shut up and like it.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/07/20 07:09 PM
11

I have never understood the people that put wallets, especially enormous wallets, in their back pocket.
/r/MensRights20/07/20 04:30 PM
3

Except it's not the power imbalance of doctor and prisoner I'm talking about. It's doctor and the entire prison infrastructure on one side, and the prisoner on the other.
/r/MensRights16/07/20 04:18 PM
14

I think it's possible to ethically do experiments with prisoners No. Just no. The power imbalance is insurmountable. No matter how much you try to justify it or cloak it, you're experimenting on people who probably wouldn't make that choice if they were free.
/r/MensRights16/07/20 03:58 PM
2

You realize that by banning a sub or two they agree with, it gives them an excuse and cover to ban all the subs they don't agree with? They can always point and say "look, we banned all the extremists. Not just mensrights, we banned a feminist sub too."
/r/MensRights01/07/20 02:18 AM
2

sticky this.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen26/06/20 09:05 PM
0

Bernie Sanders staffers... It's like people just don't learn.
/r/MensRights21/06/20 02:57 PM
16

Universities are scamming these females with trash degrees mostly, they get low wages if they even get a job too. Single women under 30 actually make more than men. Only the ones who decide to live off their SO or have kids make the same or less.
/r/MensRights20/06/20 02:54 PM
3

They don't need to, they already make more money until they decide to start having kids or let their husbands work. Have been for a decade or more. http://content.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,2015274,00.html
/r/MensRights18/06/20 03:29 AM
-8

Look at Tony Timpa’s video. Or Daniel Shaver. It doesn’t only happen to black people. It happens across the board. You're making my point for me, you freaking massive racist. I said fuck all about race. I made the point about 'armed suspects' and how likely it is they are not actually armed. So you point out a couple good examples, including one of the most egregious cases of a helpless unarmed 'armed suspect'; a drunk sobbing dude just trying to pull his pants up. But then you make it about rac…
/r/MensRights16/06/20 04:22 PM
-9

So you replied in under a minute, meaning you didn't even attempt watch the video. Or you already knew about it, but it doesn't fit your narrative, so you're dismissing it. Good day sir, I'm not going to try and argue with the willfully ignorant. Stupid you can fix with patience. Willfully ignorant you can't fix.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 04:12 PM
-5

Read my reply to your other comment then. I didn't cherry pick a video, I picked one local to me that I saw before the locqal and then national media picked up the story. Do even a little bit of digging and you'll find more.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 04:06 PM
-3

most of whom were armed Oh, they were armed, huh? Like this guy? Where they shoot a lightly jogging man in the back, handcuff him while screaming "hands behind your back" to a fucking dead guy after pumping 8 shots into him from 15 feet, and then gets caught leaving the 'drop gun' on video? Which was probably his taser that he dropped, but he called on his radio saying the 'perp took it'. Cops are literally pulling the "look out, he's coming right for us" South Park skit every day. There's hours…
/r/MensRights16/06/20 04:04 PM
17

You have to understand that feminists like this don't believe men are people. So in their minds, no, this isn't disrespectful to anyone.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen28/05/20 09:22 PM
2

Yup. Brave new world applies more than 1984.
/r/MensRights23/04/20 12:31 AM
2

I guess that's where we differ. You absolutely can and should be blamed for starting violence. A hit to the head can literally kill someone. Words hurt nothing but your ego.
/r/MensRights07/04/20 05:06 PM
2

So violence is just a social consequence?
/r/MensRights07/04/20 10:44 AM
2

Retaliation for what? Talking? You let someone talking to you control you like a remote control toy if you think anything they said justifies violence against them. The reason free speech is enshrined and effectively unlimited (fire in a theater) is that once you start making exceptions, it's all just moving goalposts until you're restricting speech to people you just disagree with. The most important free speech is the most abhorrent. If you silence it, you give it power. It becomes whispers, y…
/r/MensRights07/04/20 10:11 AM
2

Sure I might lose my shit and punch someone. It's not likely, but nothing is impossible. However, it wouldn't be justified, and it's still an escalation on my part if I did. Letting someone control you with mere words to the point that you physically attack them is giving them a huge amount of power over you.
/r/MensRights07/04/20 09:46 AM
11

they're programmed. they are literally taught to think of nothing else. the first thing to be removed is a sense of accountability, One of the best movie lines of all time. Gushy literature fan: "How do you write women so well?" Jack fucking Nicholson: "I think of a man, and I take away reason and accountability."
/r/MensRights07/04/20 06:21 AM
2

Because it makes black single mothers and gay men money Can you say "destroys the strong black family unit and replaces the black father with government handouts" in democrat? I can't remember what comedian said it but black men are the canary in the coal mine for where the globalists want to take all men.
/r/MensRights07/04/20 06:10 AM
2

Juicy Smollyay.
/r/MensRights07/04/20 06:08 AM
2

Say something terrible enough and people will start hitting you, that doesn't necessarily make them the instigators for making it physical. Except that it fucking does. Words don't justify violence. This is going into 'but she wore that dress, she was asking for it' or "hes's a guy, of course he wanted it' territory.
/r/MensRights07/04/20 06:08 AM
8

Holy shit is some of the info in your post so obviously self-contradictory if you actually look at it. I'm not calling you out, I'm pointing out that the cognitive dissonance is so deep people don't even look at it anymore. both parents are [imputed an income,] based on either A) tax returns, or [B) ability to earn.] So, hypothetical income because you -could- make that much. Try to remember, a judge [can't rule on a hypothetical.] Except when they are deciding you can make $x amount of dollars.
/r/MensRights06/04/20 04:01 PM
5

Because it's not about equality. It's not even about female winning, it's about erasing male contributions period.
/r/MensRights27/01/20 08:17 AM
2

living off his savings He's not even leaching yet.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 03:02 AM
23

Saying boys should never cry and that young men should "man-up" This is enforced more by women than by men.
/r/MensRights11/12/19 07:58 AM
10

First of all if you're getting married without a prenuptial your an idiot. It's always the comments that fuck simple shit like this up that are hilariously wrong. A prenup means fuck all if the judge in your divorce case doesn't want it to. They get overturned on the regular, and more often the further from 50/50 the split of property gets.
/r/MensRights11/12/19 02:26 AM
16

it’s usually the black guys that stand up for men Because (on average, look at the numbers) they're a generation or so further along on single motherhood and almost no male role models while growing up.
/r/MensRights04/12/19 08:14 PM
2

Shit, me and male buddies have thrown punches at each other out of anger. You hitting a friend you're not trying to fuck vs. you hitting your S.O. Two totally different situations.
/r/MensRights02/12/19 05:30 PM
2

Because young western women have been protected and lied to their entire lives. They've been told over and over and over that "it's never ok to hit a girl" and that they're just as strong as men. If a guy ever once hits back growing up, much less initiates violence, he's attacked by parents/teachers/peers and socially ostracized. So of course young women feel bulletproof. The vast majority have been for all 20ish years of their lives. That's their lifelong experience up until hitting a work envi…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/19 10:04 AM
1

Ad homiem attacks rather than actual reasoned discourse? Given the votes overnight it looks like others don't think it's the Russians either. Maybe it has something to do with literal Chinese ownership of US media companies? But it's ok, keep your head in the sand. Personally, I'm pretty sure you're not a Chinese plant or Russian bot since you called a dude stupid but misspelled their later in the sentence. A bot or a paid poster would have spellchecked.
/r/MensRights15/11/19 02:28 PM
3

Russians stoking our culture wars You really think it's Russians, with 90% of American media kowtowing to the Chinese?
/r/MensRights15/11/19 05:10 AM
3

Not to mention it's more hygienic Not the case actually. There is a lower amount after a single flush, but even closed you're still getting that all over the place unless the lid is airtight. Which no toilet lid is.
/r/MensRights10/11/19 12:08 AM
12

if you're a feminist and you manage to get into the Army, the Marines, whatever branch you try for, you quickly learn that if you can't pull your own weight, nobody's going to carry it for you You're dreaming. They absolutely get carried, to absurd levels.
/r/MensRights14/10/19 04:33 PM
6

Dude, you are just all different kinds of wrong. Marines is 18 mins for 3 miles for both men AND women. That's not to pass, that's to max out the score @ 100 pts. And that's for men only, it's 21 mins for women. For a 51 year old man to max, he needs a 19:30, or 1:30 faster than an 18 year old woman needs to max her score. Passing is 27:40 for men and 30:50 for women @ 18.
/r/MensRights12/10/19 01:27 AM
6

Yeah I'm just pointing out that even showing only full time hours worked, the gap closes by 5%. Doesn't show the flat out hours worked comparison at all. Shows the bias of statistics even in (especially in?) government reports that should be flat number comparisons. Scoll down a bit for bald numbers and you get: Working and work-related activities Male-4.16 Female-3.02 So the average adult female works 72.6% of the hours the average man does. So allowing solely for hours worked the wage gap is s…
/r/MensRights07/10/19 05:36 PM
40

among full-time employees, men worked 8.2 hours compared to women working 7.8 hours Dig a bit into the part time/full time divide and you get quite a bit closer to the tweet rates.
/r/MensRights07/10/19 04:52 AM
1

These women are within my circle of close friends, I know they're good people, I've had all kinds of rational discussions with them, I know they're fair and ethical people who wouldn't knowingly participate in any kind of man-hating activities. If you've had rational discussions with them and they still haven't listened to Jordan Peterson or seen Feminism gone too far, then they aren't good and fair and ethical, because they're dismissing your viewpoint if they won't look to see where it came fr…
/r/MensRights23/08/19 12:10 PM
1

No idea on the specific source, but googling from 'male babies tend to fuss faster than female babies' the first article that pops is this and it's got sources at the bottom. Should help you narrow down a source or find it if it's not one of these by using those to help search.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 06:10 PM
4

but I am somewhere more fine with being beat up in public by a woman than being held down while my child gets taken. And the reason why the latter was even possible is because the former is an accepted fact of life.
/r/PussyPass17/01/19 06:46 PM
7

They almost seemed creeped out or offended I noticed rules 1&2.
/r/MensRights27/12/18 03:11 PM
1

Except people have tried repeatedly and been universally denied, bar one state (iirc) that will allow them in if they identify and present as female.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 03:38 AM
6

Give everyone equal opportunity Equal opportunity was already there, in the form of Girl Scouts. If you want it to be more like Boy Scouts, reform Girl Scouts. Don't demand Boy Scouts allow girls while the reverse isn't true or even considered, that's special treatment.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 05:48 PM
3

Is there a reason why enlisted people marry a lot? The biggest one is unmarried sub e-6 enlisted are treated like third world children. Married e-1s literally just out of basic training get better treatment than single e-4s at the end of their first term. Like is there a tax or pay reason Depending on your location (housing allowance is adjusted by area) a brand new boot will more than double their pay with BAH. Even if they get base housing, they're getting more money and they're not stuck in b…
/r/MensRights21/05/18 03:43 AM
2

Are you serious? I'd say it's reversed, at least if you're talking Western Europe. I think what you're seeing is more people questioning feminism in the US, as opposed to Europeans keeping their heads down so they don't get fired/sent off to jail for speaking up. You can't even get a freaking paternity test in France or Germany if the mother says no.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 08:56 PM
2

Again, you're building a mountain out of a molehill. No one is asking for every single step. Just the ones (implantation comes to mind) with lasting consequences possible.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 11:02 AM
5

If the commenters here had their way, the clinic would spend more time verifying the authenticity of a consent form than they would spend providing medical care. Because calling him to verify his signature takes so much time.
/r/MensRights06/10/17 08:37 PM
17

That's what I love about this. The most common source of men taking ballet outside of actual ballet dancers (there to throw around female ballet dancers) is professional football and rugby players looking to boost their strength, posture, and agility.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 02:39 PM
3

Maybe she was deliberately saving your seat.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 06:12 PM
2

Simply controlling for hours worked removes the majority of the pay gap without even checking any other variables.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 08:59 PM
12

..The males (and females but still) literally have the power to move shit and kill things with pure willpower using the force are you serious right now... if a man can come out of the woodworks and learn to move shit by wanting too (Luke) why can't a woman??? Which they couldn't do in the first movies. Luke got carried, he wasn't a better pilot than Han Solo off the bat, he wasn't better in combat than a trained stormtrooper, he was whiny and got his ass kicked for two movies. The problem isn't …
/r/MensRights14/06/17 04:31 AM
5

I do so love someone whose grand total combat experience is playing COD dropping these nuggets of knowledge online. No, you totally don't even need to be in shape guys, really. Just pull the trigger.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 03:41 PM
1

They got soldiers to hit silhouette targets, yes. Target shooting doesn't translate into combat shooting. Go read that study again. You'll find the same percentage of trigger pullers are actually shooting to hit/miss in combat now as there was in WW1 and earlier. The
/r/MensRights07/05/17 07:46 PM
1

Like the instinctual level urge to protect women and children. It's generally not women running into burning buildings unless it's their own kids, but you see guys doing that shit all the damn time. Go google and watch the youtube vids they've done of experiments with men hitting women and women hitting men. It's not just societal programming causing the hugely different reactions, there is a very large and very real animal brain instinct to protect women/young. It's one reason human females, li…
/r/MensRights07/05/17 06:09 PM
1

You can't solve instinctive level reactions.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 07:19 AM
1

I've never understood the anger at other guys/girls fucking your SO. They're the piece of shit that cheated on you, not the random they nailed at a club. Probably half or more of 'Jodys' never even knew they were banging someone in a relationship. That said, fuck any Jody that knows. There isn't any lower life form than someone knowingly fucking a deployed military member's SO while they're deployed, except maybe child molesters.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 01:20 PM
23

It's easy to be satisfied when your 'job' consists of maybe 4 hours of light work a day, and that's with kids.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 06:11 PM
2

Being fair, medicine can help. I'm 100% willing to take whatever meds are prescribed assuming both actual thought goes into the prescription and that they might actually help me. My current experience, however, shows how quick some medical professionals are to resort to the pill crutch. The nurse practitioner (not even a doctor) at the VA for my first visit to a doctor in a decade wanted to just prescribe me antidepressants without me even seeing a counselor. Primary care my ass. When I told her…
/r/MensRights09/04/17 07:41 AM
2

Not if the help being offered consists of a program designed to help girls. Boys are different, which is why the current school system designed solely to help girls treats boys with problems as problems, as defective girls rather than as boys. If all of the counseling offered is the same as that being offered by women for women, it's not going to help even if encouraging boys to seek help works. If it's anything like the female counselors I have personally been to, many of whom were either openl…
/r/MensRights07/04/17 11:03 PM
7

It's not just that boys are't encouraged to seek help. They are actively discouraged from seeking help, by peers and authority figures both. Ask any young man who has felt suicidal and has looked for counseling, and you're more likely than not going to learn that he got an interrogation about his being likely to harm others. The default assumption of boys with mental health issues is mass murderer, not someone who is hurting that needs help.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 06:13 PM
1

From the examples you've given, you're 100% wrong in your interpretation of that message. They're both more about the relationship between people who face constant combat together. Call a spade a spade, but in this case you're grasping for a straw that just isn't there.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 03:29 AM
3

While I applaud your optimism, she absolutely can fail you because she disagrees with your topic or positions. Your only hope is that she's at least intellectually honest enough to recognize valid arguments she may disagree with. If she isn't, you're looking at not just failing that paper but the class. About your only hope at that point is a reasonable dean.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 02:59 AM
44

If a man does not want a child they can, up to the 23rd week The downside of this is all a woman needs to do to deny this right is not tell the man she's pregnant or that it's his.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 08:32 AM
2

Really, a total reboot? One where all the negative consequences and debt carries over, but none of the benefits?
/r/MensRights17/02/17 09:52 PM
12

Paging /u/girlwriteswhat She loves tearing this argument apart. Short version: the law literally is this way because of feminists. Prior to feminism, men got custody rights because they had automatic responsibility for the child's well-being. If the child was provably not his, he wasn't responsible for it and it was grounds for at fault divorce. Feminism hit and as usual, they got all of the rights but didn't gain any responsibility. Men lost all their rights while keeping all the responsibility…
/r/MensRights27/01/17 09:24 PM
4

I'm gonna go out on a limb and say she was about to either pull a deployment or short unaccompanied TDY someplace unpleasant like Korea. I've got nothing against Korea, but the US military is only there to either sit on the wall or to run field ops for cold weather.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 01:24 AM
3

It's a bone structure and natural chemicals thing. Even when women are actually willing to put in the work and have the heart/will to try grunt training, they just break quickly. At least the Corps was willing to take the political hit and be honest about training them to be grunts, so the spade got called a spade. The army just did their usual shit lowering standards and looking the other way to certify them combat ready. I'm all for women serving in the military and signing up for the draft, b…
/r/MensRights27/01/17 01:19 AM
1

The entire point of statutory rape is that teens don't know if it's harmful or not, and can be peer pressured into thinking it wasn't unwanted. It's 10 times worse when it's someone in a position of authority raping them.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 12:15 AM
7

No they couldn't, because even the admin in an infantry battalion is expected to get out and do 25 mile hikes on workups just like the rest of them. Comm is mostly radio operators, who are detailed out to infantry for exercises and in combat, and their load is generally actually heavier than most grunts. What happens in support units is women soak up a hugely disproportionate percentage of rear area duties when those units deploy people. They can't hack deployments, so they get pregnant either d…
/r/MensRights27/01/17 12:00 AM
1

I'll bite on your trolling bait. There are indeed legitimate issues at play, but none of them are on your side here. Basically, it comes down to bone/muscle structures and the fact that it's actually not comfortable to sit with legs together or crossed at the knee for men. Balls exist, our pelvis is shaped differently, our thigh muscles are shaped differently because of how they attach to hone; on top of this we've got both more upper body mass and it's out wider from the spine. The pelvis struc…
/r/MensRights14/01/17 02:19 PM
9

Outside the third world it almost entirely is, and in a large portion of the third world (Africa) it's American missionaries and aid workers pushing it.
/r/MensRights01/01/17 04:25 AM
1

So, you're using another half dozen logical fallacies and lose track of your argument so much you circle back around and make my point for me. I didn't fuck up using the word power, it's part of the definition of position of authority. 15/24 isn't a relationship of equals, one is adult and one is not. Two adults in a relationship are equal where it isn't boss/subordinate or one is somehow unfit. Employment level has nothing to do with power inside a relationship, you aren't prevented from leavin…
/r/MensRights10/12/16 10:41 PM
1

Do you really need me to link Webster's or Oxford definitions of authority, position of? Someone with the right/power to make decisions and enforce obedience. So, a parent, not a spouse. Sorry to burst your bubble, but even someone with sole income for a family doesn't have authority over adults in that family. They might have authority over how the money is spent, but they don't have authority over the bodily autonomy of the people in that family that aren't minors. That's pretty well establish…
/r/MensRights10/12/16 09:18 PM
1

No, because you aren't in a position of authority. Significant other is not a position of authority. Now, if your wife or girlfriend is also your child or you're their legal guardian, then you might have a valid argument and we could actually argue the point. Say, if you had said your wife lost her job because she had a stroke and is now mentally incapacitated. It doesn't look like you're actually trying to have a valid argument here, given this response. Stop putting words and arguments in my t…
/r/MensRights10/12/16 02:33 AM
0

Coercion is inherent when someone has a position of authority, because the threat is always present. It's why fraternization is prohibited in military units within a chain of command, but isn't a problem from one unit to another as long as the rank differential isn't too great.
/r/MensRights10/12/16 01:53 AM
1

If you can't see a victim in either case based on age, how about seeing one based on position of authority?
/r/MensRights09/12/16 09:07 PM
2

I was figuring bartender or wait staff.
/r/MensRights19/11/16 02:13 AM
3

Ask for evidence, immediately deny validity of evidence based on feelings without enough time to even read the synopsis of the study. Queue numbered list of reasons which are one thinly veiled fallacy or another, running the gamut from appeal to ignorance, moving goalposts, personal wish fulfillment, and sour grapes. Bad troll, be gone now. You need to step up your trolling game.
/r/MensRights16/11/16 01:49 AM
21

As evidenced clearly by the fact Trump's supporters, all of whom are racist white males, rioted after Obama won twice. ...Oh wait, there were no riots.
/r/MensRights13/11/16 12:58 AM
2

Women actually make up 52% or more of voting age adults (18+), and given the drastically higher felony conviction and incarceration rates for men, they make up a significant majority. Some states take this to extremes, as a single felony conviction can remove voting rights for life. Most only last for the duration of sentence. Only two states allow voting in jail, and they're not exactly big ones: Maine and Vermont. Women over 18 as of the last census (2010): 109 million men: 101 million, then s…
/r/MensRights10/11/16 04:09 PM
4

It's not that people don't get it, it's that some people actually make this argument un-ironically and un-sarcastically.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 08:26 PM
6

It doesn't say it, because they weren't ever asked for their opinions on inequality. If that doesn't break it down for you, I'm afraid nothing will.
/r/MensRights30/10/16 12:53 PM
7

No, that's not what's going on here. You break up any match like this once an opponent is grounded. The guys aren't there to protect the girl, they're there to stop injuries regardless of who is on the ground. Aggression and will to kill is what this training is about, a large percentage of marines doing this won't stop without getting pulled off. Totally normal, no pussy pass here. Marines don't really have a problem denying the pussy pass when it comes to combat readiness and drills like this,…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/10/16 06:14 AM
7

where women working full-time earn yearly 80 percent of what men earn doing the same work, Full time for a man is on average 4 hours longer than for a woman, which handily eats up some of that gap. The rest is mostly the people with an axe to grind considering things like general practice doctors "same work" as neurosurgeons and anesthesiologists. That practice is hurting Britain, interesting article on it here: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2532461/Why-having-women-doctors-hurting-N…
/r/MensRights16/10/16 04:53 AM
1

And had almost zero supervision This is the problem, not what he did with his unsupervised time. The problem is he wasn't taught or socialized.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/09/16 09:22 AM
4

every CO discourages recruits from getting involved with any woman who live near a base. Which means exactly fuck all when married boots get treated better than single guys with 6 years in. Until they take away BAH/BAS and COLA, there will always be guys who get married to be treated like adults instead of children. Officers might pay lip service to this, but until they start giving married guys charge of quarters, stop knocking on doors in the barracks to pick people for extra duty, and start i…
/r/PussyPassDenied26/09/16 08:51 AM
1

I'm with the people who think this isn't a sexism issue, and is an awareness of the long-term consequences of repeated head injuries. Recent interest and studies in the long-term health effects are through the roof, and this is at a service academy, not basic training. The average graduates here are expected to spend 20 years or more leading and managing people in the military, not do a 4 year term at a pretty basic job in the same environment. Reducing lasting cognitive damage in career managem…
/r/MensRights23/09/16 05:36 AM
11

An actual example isn't a strawman argument.
/r/MensRights19/09/16 06:46 PM
7

Because the feminist true believers honestly believe that "the male gaze" empowers men and minimizes women. They believe it so hard they try to use it back, even though most men are flattered by the attention instead of horrified, just as most women are flattered by the attention instead of horrified. Actual facts don't matter, it's all feelings and doctrine. It's why they are so vicious when one of their own steps ever so slightly out of the party line, because deviating from and discussing the…
/r/MensRights13/09/16 08:01 PM
4

Try daycare, 12 years of grade and high school, and 4 years of college. Almost all of education has been co-opted. Add in the vast majority of HR departments, including the military. Boys and men get told how evil they are literally from toddlers to retirement.
/r/MensRights08/09/16 04:37 PM
2

I'm going to build a wall around your opinion, and make you pay for it!
/r/MensRights01/09/16 07:47 PM
1

Just because people retroactively tried to go back and rename shows to a different genre than original doesn't make it so. It would be like going back and claiming that talent shows or documentaries are reality tv.
/r/MensRights01/09/16 07:29 PM
1

I have never been one of those people. Cops was documentary, not reality tv. They didn't script criminals, they just filmed and edited it. If candid camera was reality tv, then so are shitty youtube prank videos.
/r/MensRights01/09/16 06:53 PM
1

No, it was 1992. First "reality" TV show, Real World aired on MTV.
/r/MensRights01/09/16 09:03 AM
1

The people here preaching to me about men facing disadvantages are barking up the wrong tree, and I've been barked at lots by feminists also. I usually get accused of being an MRA by them, and have been called a misogynist simply for speaking up about some of the issues mentioned here. Did a separate reply to this to not clutter my other one. This quote by you shows a pretty heavy cognitive dissonance with your final statement, if you actually look at it. The fact you claim to be humanist and th…
/r/MensRights29/08/16 12:22 AM
1

At some point you've gotta drop your guns and figure out the path. Everyone else has answered your pretty unreasonably demands, so I'll just say this: You can only drop your guns and figure out the path if the other party is willing to be reasonable too. Feminists as a group have shown that they are unwilling to be reasonable, witness them pushing for ever greater benefits despite already having won not just equality but dominance in many areas. They don't even realize how childish and selfish m…
/r/MensRights28/08/16 11:59 PM
1

The yogscast at least streams a shitload on twitch.
/r/MensRights13/08/16 03:33 PM
2

Not in all cases, or people like Pewdiepie and the Yogscast wouldn't have such huge followings. It's about entertainment, and not all of the streaming audience has the same interests. I can't that screaming idiot and the Yogscast guys are sometimes really entertaining and sometimes infuriating. I watch some of their videos a lot, but not because any of them are remotely skilled.
/r/MensRights13/08/16 02:38 AM
2

What, like the back of a Volkswagen?
/r/MensRights11/08/16 08:56 AM
1

Which on its own accounts for over 1/2 the wage gap. 40 minutes at 1.5x pay (overtime) = 60 minutes normal pay. that's 12.5% more pay, cutting the infamous 23% gap down to 10.5%.
/r/MensRights29/06/16 01:11 AM
4

Abortion is about bodily autonomy before the fetus has legal rights. This doesn't wash with the fact that if someone kills a pregnant woman, it's two counts of murder. You are. An abandoned child can lead to felony charges with the exception of safe haven laws. However, should the child be kept, with both parents known, both parents are on the hook for supporting the child. This is where you're being deliberately obtuse. We're in a thread talking about a man not knowing, so why is he being held …
/r/MensRights20/06/16 03:59 AM
6

have the right to financial support from both parents But only one of those parents has the option to unilaterally give up that responsibility, either with an abortion prior to birth or giving up the child free and clear after birth. (google safe haven laws) I'm not muddying waters, you are. If a woman gives up her child, she is not later held responsibly for it. This means that your theory of both sexes being held responsible to support the child's financial rights is just that, a theory. You'r…
/r/MensRights19/06/16 10:02 PM
6

The law states that a child has a right to receive financial support from both legal parents. That is an unconditional right, provided to children born of a married couple, a one night stand, or of statutory rape. This is just patently false. The difference if the child is a result of a female rape victim, she can either choose to abort or later forfeit parental rights and give it up, and NOT pay support. A male rape victim is the only victim being held responsible for his victimization, it's a …
/r/MensRights19/06/16 08:31 PM
1

We must not be watching the same video, because I see her actually locking out at the bottom of each one. A rhythm only affects score if you're swinging or kipping with it, and she wasn't. That, or you had one the aforementioned asshole scorers, or they didn't like you.
/r/MensRights22/04/16 12:51 PM
1

No, those are legit USMC regulation pullups. No swinging, no leg pumping. She'd only get a couple marked off if the scorer was an asshole or didn't like her, which does happen.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 06:20 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter