TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

thaw334 Archive

View 0 posts and 21 comments by thaw334 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

There have been no rumours surrounding her love life since. Her love life???????
/r/MensRights27/02/18 03:48 PM
2

It wasn't as bad as I was expecting.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 06:58 AM
1

It is your responsibility to determine what is factually correct.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 02:01 AM
2

I took a sex and gender class at my university last semester as a GPA booster. The professor did speak to the differences in our brains, and pointed out that we don't know the extent to which these differences account for our behavior (which is true. We have some indication, but it's not fully explanatory). But then she went on to say that we are "basically the same" except "males are more aggressive on average and males are stronger physically". The class was slightly biased towards women's iss…
/r/MensRights27/02/18 01:42 AM
1

Damore advocated for modifying the workplace itself to help accommodate women.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 01:38 AM
1

More than that: when reality is accepted, possibility can be strived for-- and accurately. We are different, but the brain is plastic. Women can go into STEM if they want to. Most who want to are successful in their endeavor. Could be they have brains that look more like a man's, could be they put in the work to build skill in areas not readily provided for by biology. It could also be that biology doesn't have a significant impact on our success in a field, but rather our desire in a field of s…
/r/MensRights27/02/18 01:36 AM
2

I completely agree. I actually used to reject the biological definitions for masculinity and femininity, but I think there's a good basis for these understandings. I think the problem has been that we have historically forced people into embodying masculine and feminine roles, when in reality humans are more malleable. Women mostly embody femininity, while men mostly embody masculinity, but both embody the other to some degree, and there are also outliers that exist entirely apart from that fram…
/r/MensRights25/02/18 11:01 PM
1

This is about the definition of femininity. We don't really know what femininity is, or if it is even a valid concept. But most of us believe that femininity involves certain traits-- these are softness, kindness, love, protection/nurture, etc. Masculinity is strength, protection, drive/willpower, strategy, etc. The truth is, most people embody these traits to different degrees. Women historically embody our feminine definition more than our masculine definition, but they still have these "mascu…
/r/MensRights25/02/18 10:46 PM
7

Ultimately feminists believe that women don't like to crunch chips loudly in public because the patriarchy has oppressed them into that desire. It's not a campaign against Doritos, it's once again a campaign against the invisible patriarchy. Women aren't allowed to be women because the patriarchy has historically defined femininity. So, aparently redefining femininity entails that women be made into the patriarchy-defined masculine (loud, obnoxious, aggressive), and that men be made into the pat…
/r/MensRights25/02/18 10:07 PM
2

"They were enraged at the assertion that somehow, somewhere, there might exist women who don’t align with the feminist insistence that women are actually closeted men. " Hahahaha. It's so true.
/r/MensRights25/02/18 09:58 PM
3

I honestly don't know who else would have time for this shit
/r/MensRights23/02/18 02:00 AM
0

So right from the start, he either has to concede a point, which he never does. Or act like an ideological asshole. Which is inherently infuriating to talk to. This is really the sense I got from it. He's not there to start a conversation and bring awareness, he's there to fuel controversy and feel better-than-thou, and I get the same sense from the comment section on his videos. Definitely not a helpful move in favor of men's rights.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 09:57 PM
-1

His commentary, as well as the comments of the viewers.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 07:05 PM
2

But, using your own words, lived without recognition and without a penny their entire lives. Not everyone can get recognition. Many, if not most, of those men were what you'd call "ahead of their time". And not everyone needs recognition. You won't work for free if you don't want to. I wasn't talking necessarily about squalor, but the passion of a man who does work for himself and accidentally contributes something priceless to society.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 07:04 PM
1

I disagree with you. "Serving" is not to be taken in a light of senselessness. Serving in this case is a type of honor. Many men produced masterpieces without recognition in their lifetime, without a penny, yet their works lived for many lifetimes after them, and continue to live and serve society today. Irreplaceable masterpieces, masterpieces that changed the entire world. They made these masterpieces because it fulfilled them, whether they knew the impact it would have or not. That is the nat…
/r/MensRights22/02/18 08:50 AM
-2

His video series are kind of.. Pointless in that way. It's basically just an excuse to make fun of people.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 05:17 AM
4

SCANDALOUS
/r/MensRights22/02/18 04:55 AM
4

For clarity's sake, that was a joke on her part.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 04:54 AM
6

and a book deal Haha yes, and a book deal for sure
/r/MensRights21/02/18 02:50 AM
4

This needed to be said!
/r/MensRights21/02/18 02:49 AM
1

Hey! I'm also trying to start a club. I have a whole three members so far. I would love to talk to you about what you guys are doing and to share experiences. https://www.reddit.com/r/UCalgary/comments/7y3ycf/would_anyone_be_interested_in_starting_or_talking/
/r/MensRights17/02/18 11:12 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter