the-friendzoner Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
2	Proctor and Gamble releases anti men commercial. Here's all their products to boycott What can sound like "accepted wisdom" from feminists is in reality aspersions and manufactured stereotypes created for the purpose of defaming and shaming men. I'm not going to argue against this because I don't think that as a woman I have direct experience to know what it's like to be shamed for being a man, I just know that if we're drawing a DIRECT comparison, it's not to tell us we're sluts or to shame us. I think the message was intended to challenge men to be better PEOPLE to each other i…	/r/MensRights	16/01/19 10:53 PM
4	Proctor and Gamble releases anti men commercial. Here's all their products to boycott "Women, remember that it's truly shameful when you cheat. Finally, society has had enough of your duplicity, and what you have done to mankind. You should be ashamed when it happens, not pretend it doesn't matter - you're filthy sluts when you do it, but all is not lost! You must work together to build the demure and trustworthy womankind that gentlemen need!" No it's not. It would be like a tampon manufacturer telling women: "Stop tearing each other down. Stop treating people badly. Be kind. Do…	/r/MensRights	16/01/19 12:25 AM
5	TBP; is there any behavior or attitude you like in women, but dislike in men? I really don't like shitty people. I find that the behavior that makes someone unlikeable isn't bound to a specific sex.	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/10/14 03:49 PM
3	Definition of solipsism However if you get two women with different backgrounds: hot and fat for example. The hive mind connection comes loose. If the entire premise of Red Pill is to illustrate the differences in the sexes and create a generalized strategy for dating women, then it would defeat the purpose to say that all women are different in thought processes. Right? That just seems basic to me. So, this is where the entirety of the premise becomes contrarian to itself. State one aspect to cover one explanation, bu…	/r/PurplePillDebate	12/09/14 07:07 PM
4	Definition of solipsism The inability to understand what other people are thinking(not feeling). The inability to understand what other people are thinking or the inability to understand what men, specifically her partner, is thinking? I think this distinction is important, because if you reversed your situation of "male stranger vs. female partner" to "female stranger vs. male partner" you might find the results are similar. I don't think opposite sex-based solipsism is impossible, I think it deserves a lot more resea…	/r/PurplePillDebate	12/09/14 06:29 PM
3	What would you actually like women to do with their lives? It goes both ways, you know. I've had to financially foot the bill for men in my life too. However, in my experience, and to my knowledge, the likelihood of people not being able to support themselves (for both sexes) is quite low.	/r/PurplePillDebate	12/09/14 12:09 AM
0	What would you actually like women to do with their lives? All fanatical hard-line philosophies are dangerous. However, I would never ask for their opinions on how to live my life, which is what you essentially are doing. It gives them an opening. They're just wrong to assume their beliefs are globally applicable, plain and simple. A hard no is harder to argue with than a rationalization.	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/09/14 06:38 PM
0	What would you actually like women to do with their lives? Why do you care so much about TRP stances? There is no intelligible reasoning in their circle jerk mentality, and it's all circular logic. "I was wronged by a woman, all women are like that, you're lying when you say you're an honest woman, I was wronged by a woman." Or, my personal favorite: "Treat women like children, get mad when they act like children, don't take responsibility for the roles and behaviors that have been fostered in the relationship, treat women like children." Do whatever th…	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/09/14 06:26 PM
1	AMA REQUEST: Blue Pill Woman! But I mean honestly, most women I know fit in the latter and they didn't even know the pills existed.	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/07/14 06:30 PM
5	Can we try this question again please? "How are women not the gatekeepers of sex?" It seems to indicate that men prefer prudes to sluts (on /r/askmen), which I have found to hold true among most of the men I have met as well. Until they date them, then they want to have sex, right? And if the women want to wait, they get called tease and a prude by men. When men want to wait, they get heralded for being sensitive. At the very least this is how I think TRP views the situation: they don't expect individual women to be both sluts and prudes. They see two groups of women: sluts an…	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/07/14 05:01 AM
6	Can we try this question again please? "How are women not the gatekeepers of sex?" This line of thinking comes from evolutionary psycho babble. RE: Women have to choose a quality mate because her eggs take 9 months to gestate and are limited, however men's semen is plentiful and can be reproduced every 30 minutes to 4 hours depending on the man's reproductive refractionary period. But that's all a bunch of bull, and here's why. And yes, I know when I say social construct you're going to roll your eyes. Women are currently in a unique position, we are told that we are sluts and…	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/07/14 04:08 AM
2	Does TRP and PUA over-complicate things? I think what happens a lot of the time is there's too much emphasis on over thinking. Both sides do this. "Is it too early to text him back?" Or "If I wait until the 3rd date to have sex, he won't think I'm easy, but have to wait another date." We doubt ourselves too much, and when we act it's no longer organic to our personality because we just did exactly the opposite of what we wanted.	/r/PurplePillDebate	05/07/14 03:30 AM
5	Train a society of men that the only acceptable option is to be "the nice guy". But.. If they notice that it works against them in dating that must mean they only want sex. So berate and chastise them Was somebody saying otherwise? You and the OP. You aren't as aggressive about it, however the OP's point was that all women that go out on dates with a man and never see them again are either conning or abusing their date. I'm saying this isn't a general practice. You do realize I wrote "legitimate opportunity", right? Oh, I realise it. I chose to ignore it because no one has a legitimate opportunity with anyone. You shouldn't see it like you're applying for a job or something. That's mistake nu…	/r/MensRights	21/05/13 01:02 AM
4	Train a society of men that the only acceptable option is to be "the nice guy". But.. If they notice that it works against them in dating that must mean they only want sex. So berate and chastise them ...No, she did it deliberately. Your beef is with one single female. Not all women. He deserves a legitimate opportunity to continue the relationship as opposed to getting conned. Regardless of how the person he set his affections on feels? Really? he deserves it because he's a person and that's just common decency. You know what's common decency? Not to have expectations set in place that makes the other person feel uncomfortable. That's common decency. You can't make a rule out of one exceptio…	/r/MensRights	21/05/13 12:05 AM
7	Train a society of men that the only acceptable option is to be "the nice guy". But.. If they notice that it works against them in dating that must mean they only want sex. So berate and chastise them goes out once with them somewhere expensive and gets them to pay for dinner, then not going out again goes out once Seems to me like she gave him a chance, while on the date realised there was no potential or sexual attraction, and just moved on. If you want to participate in the dating game, these are the digs. She doesn't owe him anything because he paid for a fancy dinner. He doesn't deserve anything either.	/r/MensRights	20/05/13 04:59 PM