TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

the3rdoption Archive

View 0 posts and 325 comments by the3rdoption on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Odom: over dosed on meth.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 02:09 AM
1

"Oh baby, I'm right there, oh, that's the spot!" "I'm sorry, Amy. I've gotta stop right there. It's too close to 10 minutes, and that wasn't a clear 'yes'. Maybe we can get coffee some time."
/r/MensRights16/10/15 02:06 AM
7

Got it. But yeah. I recognize that privilege exists. It's just not distributed so simply as some would like to believe.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 08:29 AM
1

Can we install grass on the field? I don't care if you shave it, or pull it out later. But I'd be a little more comfortable knowing we were getting plastic women, not vinyl girls.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 08:26 AM
1

What? On her face?
/r/MensRights14/10/15 08:20 AM
2

But i don't want my sex robot to love me. I don't want to love it. I want it to blow me while i watch tv after a long day. You know, like an interactive sex toy. Not a relationship replacement.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 08:19 AM
9

In reality, it doesn't even fall so cleanly on those lines. Geographic location plays into it too. Being well off in Lexington, KY is not the same as being well off in San Francisco. And where class lines fall, exactly, is debatable. Not like there's some magic number on your w2 that grants class privilege. And even with the notably wealthy, it can be divided into old money/new money, each with their own privileges and disadvantages. The reality of the matter is that privilege (i recognize that …
/r/MensRights14/10/15 07:58 AM
3

As i recall from catechism, it's a rather polite code for "you're guilty because your parents fucked (and your mom loved the D)". That's how Jesus was justified as being born without sin. Because, supposedly, no sex took place in order for him to be conceived. Though, i don't know, man. If Mary was a beautiful young woman, and Joseph was a good looking young man, and they were already practically married through a rather serious version of engagement... ya know, in that situation, why did Joseph…
/r/MensRights14/10/15 07:51 AM
12

No. No i didn't. I just told you to check your privilege checking.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 07:27 AM
5

I'm reminded of the SRA (Satanic Ritual Abuse) scare of the 80s. A bunch of people came forward as victims, claiming they were part of a huge network of other victims, and a larger network of perpetrators. They claimed to have been used as breeding stock for infants to be used in satanic rituals, and to have been raped and otherwise abused for unholy rites... But, when law enforcement looked into, they claimed that they didn't find evidence of anything. Which, of course, meant that law enforceme…
/r/MensRights14/10/15 07:25 AM
2

Developing a concept here about the Emperor's New Clothes. It's just in early stages here, so bear with me... They offer us new clothes (recognition of privilege), that we might fit in with their elite. Any questioning of the new clothes is met with vehement insistence that there are most certainly clothes (privileges, of course). Those that take the bait, and unquestioningly wear the new clothes, in reality, find themselves stripped of anything worthy of pride.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 07:16 AM
3

You'll get your privilege check in the mail. Only cashable at Bank of Teh Menz.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 07:09 AM
4

But, having a black man in office makes it all good, right? (Ignoring that by his leanings, he's a dark cracker)
/r/MensRights14/10/15 07:08 AM
21

Living in a little hick farm town as a long hair, there were maybe 2 or 3 times my car wasn't searched during a traffic stop. Often times, i didn't actually commit any violation. Like the time i pulled out of a gas station, across a single set of double yellow lines (perfectly legal in California) into a turn lane. Cop stopped me, said it was illegal to pull from that lot into the turn lane. I pointed out that it was a single set of double yellows. He said it was supposed to be a double set. App…
/r/MensRights14/10/15 07:04 AM
5

Difference is that I'm actually quite proud of my sins. I've earned them, and don't you dare forgive me for them. Privilege on the other hand... you mean all the things I've bled for? The idea, as a male, of marrying someone that was a good provider wasn't really presented as an option. It was always that I'd have to work for everything i had. So i did. And now i have stuff. And I'm told that what i have is in large part because I'm male and has nothing to do with all the work I've put in earnin…
/r/MensRights14/10/15 06:47 AM
1

Well, so... i think the "white men" thing was open for interpretation. I mean, she's a poc because she says so. What's to say any other white male isn't a poc?
/r/MensRights12/10/15 02:55 AM
1

I'd like to see her make a bad porn. That seems to be the new feminist attention grab.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 02:52 AM
3

20,000 of them has not made me a better person. Just more cynical.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 02:01 AM
43

Wait... isn't that the excuse admin used to ban some subs? Encouraging/condoning their members brigading?
/r/MensRights12/10/15 01:59 AM
1

Cheat. Use a compact mirror.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 01:43 AM
6

I... i kinda wanna see Scarlet's cock now. I hope it's big, and shapely, and treated with artistic dignity.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 01:42 AM
3

Bingo. A lot of elderly people need diapers. Just because grandma's bladder isn't made of cast iron anymore doesn't mean she can't consent to a good go in the sack with grandpa.
/r/MensRights04/10/15 07:46 AM
0

Well, it was more of a mentally disabled fuck. He wasn't sick, per se.
/r/MensRights04/10/15 07:43 AM
1

On that note, since we can apparently charge people for learning this stuff, I'll be hosting an in depth course on phrenology. Cost includes a full case of snake oil, shark cartilage pills, and a vape pen. Please make checks payable to "cash".
/r/MensRights04/10/15 07:41 AM
1

Well, so... in the more extreme cases of mental incompetence, they are a ward of the state, or of caregivers, or custodians, etc. The person or people in charge of their wellbeing are responsible for their doings. For example, if a person with an extreme case of retardation goes and spraypaints their name on a wall, the person who was in charge of them takes the fine, because it was their responsibility to keep a handle on the retarded person's activities. As you can see by the tagging in LA, th…
/r/MensRights04/10/15 07:35 AM
1

Well, so... recently i discovered that in the EU, workers have 30 days a year of paid vacation. I think both men and women in the US should get that. Should cover any needed sick days. If you're sick for more than 3 weeks, you may want to look into asking a specialist about that.
/r/MensRights04/10/15 07:22 AM
0

Wait... guys want virgins still? What the hell? Have you guys ever had one? It's only good for the novelty of it. If you're one of the lucky few who's deeply in love with someone who's equally in love with you, and you're reach other's first, then congrats. But for the rest of us, the first go around is basically blindly fumbling in the dark trying to perform nuclear fission. I would rather have a woman that i don't have to teach everything. Getting a good blow job is a big deal for me. When i f…
/r/MensRights04/10/15 07:18 AM
1

...but you get the chance to shut them down later. I've heard these lies from guys too. The "yeah, she was sooo fucking hot. But she didn't want me to watch the game on Sunday, so i told her not to let the door hit her on the way out." Really, now? So... is that her car parked out front, or did you get a new pink beetle?
/r/MensRights04/10/15 07:07 AM
2

Pre-training sounds like a great idea. Hell, i have no idea why we wouldn't want that. Provided the end result is up to par, why wouldn't we want that? But, of course, that's provided par either remains the same, or gets more stringent. It's pretty clear to see why we don't want to make exceptions on this front for the sake of looking progressive.
/r/MensRights04/10/15 06:36 AM
2

As i was saying. Makes some guys uncomfortable. Like they don't get it.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 02:20 PM
3

Wouldn't you? I mean, really, I'm not sure the army is the best place to be pioneering this. They are kinda the grunt force. Not so psychotic as the Marines (sorry guys, but you know it's true). Not so logistics and support based as the navy (just saying. I'm not going to send a platoon of sailors to take a village... but if you guys don't mind hauling some F/A-18s over for a little air support)... maybe if the airforce wants to beef up their recon? They seem to hold a little more draw for those…
/r/MensRights01/10/15 05:16 AM
4

I'll agree on that. I'd also venture that they've never worked in a field where physical abilities and natural intangible talents are critical. On my end, I don't have military experience. I'm a lighting tech for concerts and stuff. For us, the ability to work an 8 hour day is just a basic expectation. What really matters is how you hang when you're at 10 hours. If you're slipping at 10 hours, there's no way you're not dangerous at 16 hours. And, it just happens to be that most of the people tha…
/r/MensRights01/10/15 04:13 AM
12

Jane Parkhurst comes to mind (the woman that inspired GI Jane). Her story is kinda awesome and inspiring. And she definitely proved that some women can hack it just as well as the men. Some women. And i know you've met at least one of those in your life. Doesn't own much makeup. Owns maybe a few dresses/skirts... but for the most part is a jeans and t-shirt kinda gal. The kinda woman who will help you move, and will look at you like you're stupid if you try to hand her the light box. She will gl…
/r/MensRights01/10/15 03:08 AM
1

Not a cure. Reduces sex drive. Doesn't eliminate it.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 02:39 AM
1

Yes he was. Pleasted, who had previous convictions,
/r/MensRights29/09/15 11:55 PM
5

Ok. But this guy was convicted of raping a child.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 09:47 PM
0

Agree. We should make the default sentence the death penalty, particularly for molest. The disorder that drives it does not seem to be curable.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 09:46 PM
1

We can assume that /u/ayumuuu has not been convicted of raping a child.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 09:44 PM
1

Apparently not. They booted me once they found out that my penis is fully functional.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 07:04 PM
1

Yeah. Moms in the industry typically have local gigs. Tied to a studio, or a theatre, or a local production company (as i am. Not as much money as touring, but 26 days of the month I'm in my own bed).
/r/MensRights29/09/15 03:59 PM
1

Fair enough. Upvotes/downvotes around here seem fickle. On the fem subs, you get downvotes when you come off as male. Upvotes are when you make a good point without giving away your gender. Around here, it seems to be a weird formula. Involves gender, logic, denouncement of feminism, expressing a conservative view, calling bullshit when you see it, and not calling bullshit on popular ideas.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 02:05 PM
1

Well, i would believe that that specific hour of that specific day, maybe Israel was in the lead.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 06:28 AM
1

"Rescued" a woman from that situation. Her husband stabbed her dog with a steak knife. After the dog chewed up everything between floor and knee height between 8am and 5:30pm, i kinda understood where he was coming from. But still.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 06:21 AM
1

God, i hope they have mediocre marriages.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 06:17 AM
1

So... she wants a structural engineer that's in the Hell's Angels?
/r/MensRights29/09/15 06:16 AM
2

Sad state of affairs when that title can actually be taken seriously.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 06:14 AM
1

According to D.J.'s mother, the 34-year-old suffers from cerebral palsy, wears diapers and requires assistance with common everyday tasks like bathing, eating and walking. And blooking the fuck out of professors. I don't know. Where this gets weird for me is when a professor claims to have been in love with a man with cerebral palsy. As if she expects us to believe that she was truly in love with him, despite his inability to communicate, or think at half her par, or share any deep common intere…
/r/MensRights29/09/15 06:10 AM
0

Stephen Hawking does not have cerebral palsy. His brain is not inherently handicapped by his condition.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 06:01 AM
1

Agreed on the "I'm too dysfunctional to find a partner" issue. Though I'm all for adoption. I mean, ffs. There's thousands of children who already exist, and want desperately to be loved, but have no parents through no doing of their own. They would have no problem with a slightly screwed up mom or dad, so long as that person loved them. There's thousands more, arguably worse off in the foster care system with parents that maybe wound up in jail, or abused them, or just don't fucking give a shit…
/r/MensRights29/09/15 05:53 AM
2

Look, i kinda get what you're going for, but... See, #blacklivesmatter loses a little impact, considering it started around a case of a guy actually involved in criminal activity. Much the same reason I'm not offended by Chris Brown not being allowed to visit Australia. Does it have to do with his gender? Probably. Does it have to do with his race? Might be a factor. Is it justifiable because of his criminal record? Legally, yeah. Sorry, mate. They've got you on this one.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 05:42 AM
2

Semantics. They weren't married. That's all. Otherwise, if you change your comment to "girlfriend",it holds true.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 05:38 AM
1

they are arms-lengthing you Yep. They are distancing you to belittle women. Has absolutely nothing to do with ptsd, or that they've been taught to believe that they are weak for being victims. And absolutely nothing to do with your attitude toward them which you're making quite clear. Huh. Formulating a nebulous concept in the back of my mind here. A separation between technically competent, and being qualified to perform your job.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 05:34 AM
2

Crap. I forgot to not beat my husband senseless today.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 05:27 AM
2

I'm actually in one of those right now. Initially, she was the primary breadwinner. But she lost her main job. Then i got a better job. She had difficulty finding another main job, and her secondary job was costing almost 25% of her daily income to travel, provided they gave her a full shift. So, she practically had to quit that. Then we had a kid (one of those opps moments. I was against it initially. But i calmed down. Then, day of delivery, i realized how much i actually wanted to be a daddy,…
/r/MensRights29/09/15 04:59 AM
1

Eh, the time invested argument is a bit weak. There's a balance in there somewhere. If you're devoting all your time not spent working, then yes, you're losing out. However, at a certain point, you should be getting a return on recreation.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 03:51 AM
2

Neither are making money in their profession yet. But if we were to hypothesize about who's going to, once they graduate, who are you betting on?
/r/MensRights29/09/15 03:47 AM
1

So, when i was 20, i was bumming around a bit. Had a rough go off things. But picked up a minimum wage job at a brew pub. My girlfriend at the time gave me a deadline to get an apartment. Not because it was the adult thing to do, or anything. No. Because "how was i going to support her" when she was ready to move out of her parents house? I wish i could tell you i looked her dead in the eye and said "we're pretty much done now. But we lasted maybe a month more before her jealousy and trust issue…
/r/MensRights29/09/15 03:44 AM
1

It's definitely never because that woman would just not stop berating him, no matter how he begged her to please stop.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 03:13 AM
0

Ugh. Mansplaining. Am i doing it right?
/r/MensRights29/09/15 03:04 AM
1

One would hope not.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 02:47 AM
2

Bingo on that across the entertainment industry. My Saturday started at 9am and ended at 3am for Rascal Flatts. Edit: in the interest of fairness, the master electrician for Rascal Flatts is a woman. And she gets stuff done, efficiently and effectively. There was never any reason to doubt her competence, and she outworked any of the local hands. Yes, she was politely flirtatious... but that doesn't mean much to me, other than that she knows how to make the local crew move without yelling.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 02:45 AM
2

It's anecdotal evidence as to why there is a perceived wage gap. 2 people, from similar backgrounds, earning a degree in the same field. He's striving and succeeding. She's just plodding along, and complaining that his success is getting in the way of their relationship. Most relevant concept here: he is full on focused with his career as priority #1. She is prioritizing social interests.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 02:35 AM
1

Lol. Banned earlier today from a certain x sub for telling an exclusive pedophile that i despise them.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 02:28 AM
1

So, what's going through her head there? "Hopefully, if he gets hard looking at my daughter, he'll take it out on me"? If anything, sounds like an open invitation to molest the poor kid. Unless the poor kid is removed from that home permanently, i don't see any chance of her making it to adulthood unharmed.
/r/PussyPass23/09/15 11:06 PM
1

So, no guerilla warfare.... but in reality, the victor determines who's guilty for the most part.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 02:16 AM
11

Men's rights is in general support of all equality. But by equality, we mean to be equal. We don't generally support favoritism in the name of attaining equality (hiring quotas, etc). So far as the various states of gender, I don't think we much care. Anyone with the will and desire to stand on their own as an equal, and respect the rights of others to do the same is fine by me. And, of course, what we're against is outright inequality (particularly in regards to gender), and favoritism (like th…
/r/MensRights29/08/15 01:51 AM
1

Wait, we come here for white supremacy movements? I mean, sure, there's coontown... But that seems more like low grade racism than an organized hate movement.
/r/MensRights22/07/15 05:36 AM
1

Well, but I'd be just as bitchy about an "all-male Ghostbusters". Because here's the real problem: The Ghostbusters was a stupid idea. It was never not a stupid idea. Really. Think about it. A group of friends get together to trap ghosts like a paranormal version of pest exterminators. The synopsis when considered cut and dry is so lame that B movie producers would be hesitant to fund it. But Dan Aykroyd and Harold Ramis managed to write a script for what should have been a low budget film you'v…
/r/MensRights22/07/15 05:21 AM
1

Yeah. I should have been more clear when I asked for a "rocket ship".
/r/MensRights22/07/15 04:49 AM
2

He was directly asked.
/r/MensRights22/07/15 04:29 AM
0

We'd actually appreciate verified claims on that. Not calling you a liar by any means. But I don't have numbers or a source to reference on that.
/r/MensRights22/07/15 04:15 AM
2

More over, in some of the recent high profile cases, no rape ever occurred at all... So, it's not an issue of mistaken identity. It's an issue of a flat lie.
/r/MensRights22/07/15 04:09 AM
1

Never fallen asleep at the wheel, no. Been way too tired to drive. So I pulled over at a Denny's and took a nap.
/r/PussyPass20/07/15 06:43 PM
2

Seems more like he stuck his dick in crazy. Then he realized the gravity of what he did, and ran like anyone should.And he's now the bad guy for it.
/r/PussyPass20/07/15 07:48 AM
1

An accident is when you over correct on a curve and your car, while out of control, hits another car or person. Falling asleep at the wheel because you can't get your fucking priorities strait is not a fucking accident. It's a selfish failure to be responsible.
/r/PussyPass20/07/15 07:29 AM
2

You're from the school with the wanker problem!
/r/PussyPass20/07/15 06:59 AM
6

Agreed. Where once I was willing to listen and try to understand, now I'm critical of every claim. You'll get my sympathy when you clarify that you're claiming an actual case of rape.
/r/PussyPass20/07/15 06:55 AM
2

How much wood did that wood chuck wanna chuck, if she would attack her boyfriend over it?
/r/MensRights09/07/15 08:03 AM
2

I dunno. If mom has better hygiene, might as what she's up to later.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 08:01 AM
2

Ok. 10th amendment is a pretty good justification. If it's not part of the constitution, the states should have the decision... Like the states should have a decision about who gets to vote. And we should be able to own slaves. And we should be able to deny rights based on sex. And a bunch of other amendments added after the 10th.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 07:37 AM
3

Um, noo. First off, you don't get to have a public business and then openly deny people service for religious reasons. That's just not how that works. Same way you can't have a public business and refuse black people. Hell, I'm Satanic, and have walked into Christian book stores wearing Baphomet pendants, and expect (as well as receive) good service. Where else can I buy a King Phillips bible? I don't care that you're Christian. Don't bring that up unless you're a registered religious organizati…
/r/MensRights09/07/15 07:29 AM
3

Would you prefer to not have the right to marry another consenting adult?
/r/MensRights09/07/15 07:16 AM
2

It will have zero effect on false charges. This only shows that consent was attained before the act began. But consent can be revoked at any time... Like, say, immediately after signing. Or when she wakes up in the morning.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 06:16 AM
0

Ok. But in this one isolated incident, they're right. It's ghetto black girls "chimping out". Can't let them have this moment? Just this once?
/r/PussyPassDenied17/06/15 05:55 AM
1

Well, except that last quote. I mean, within the limited frame of the video, that's totally true.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/06/15 05:15 AM
0

Wait, what? Um... I'm not so sure about this one. Says she stopped and pulled over. The other drivers hit a stopped car. Doesn't really sound like her fault.
/r/PussyPass17/06/15 04:34 AM
1

By waiting 30 seconds to spot a micro agression. That is, if I don't act in a way that's courteous and helpful to one of their other clients first.
/r/MensRights07/06/15 03:16 AM
12

So, here's an idea for them (that I don't care enough about to tell them directly). Close the shop on Sundays. Not open for business to the public. Start the program, by registration. Run it as a class on bicycle mechanics. Gear it towards trans people and women, but don't necessarily prohibit men from signing up. Instate a zero tolerance policy on bullying, discrimination, etc. But above all else, don't run an unfair shop under the guise of making things fair.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 04:29 AM
2

I practice Apathy for a Better World. If it doesn't affect my life in any way, shape, or form, I don't see a reason to be against it. With same-sex marriage, I can't find a way that it has any effect on how my day plays out, positive or negative. It is a non-issue in my world. So, why should I oppose it? Of course, someone will say "well, then you should be OK with legalizing drug use"... no. Have you ever seen a crackhead? Ever seen one who's been hooked for a while, and is now out of cash, and…
/r/MensRights04/06/15 05:38 PM
3

Eh... that's the qualification to be biologically male. Llamas have penises too. To be a man implies taking a certain degree of responsibility over your own life and actions. It may include taking responsibility for others. But it probably doesn't require holding doors for otherwise physically capable people. On occasion, it's a courtesy, but not a requirement.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 05:15 PM
1

Bingo. If it were a full class of women, and all failed, there might be some questions to be asked. Such as how were the women selected? Were they ever believed to be able to hack? Or were they just the first on the list who asked? I mean, the original GI Jane, Jane Parkhurst, already proved that women can do the things that were originally men only. All while being in her 30s, with a fitness score of 290 out of 300, running with men a decade younger than her. To say that women inherently lack t…
/r/MensRights04/06/15 12:12 AM
2

As to false accusations, I've developed a bit of a character at work. Vulgar, horrific, and and morally objectionable jokes and puns all day. Of course, never in front of clients, as that would be stupid. But never the less, were someone to call up and accuse me of being a horrible person, the guys I work with would be waiting for the punchline.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 05:53 AM
2

So, having seen this and so many more complaints about dress code, I have a solution: A completely gender neutral uniform. An olive drab flight suit and standard issue black tactical boots. This may be worn over a generic Black t-shirt (chest pocket optional) and black BDUs. For hot weather, black BDU shorts will be acceptable for those that wish to wear clothing underneath. Complete equality. No "skirts for girls, pants for boys" crap. No more "boys can do this, that, and the other". No more ri…
/r/MensRights02/06/15 05:04 AM
1

Can confirm there's worse on the device in my pocket. I wish I couldn't confirm that. Don't click links you're unsure of.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 04:44 AM
1

Just a subtle hint at things to address in a complaint.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 02:05 AM
1

They've got some catching up to do, if they want to beat cracked.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 02:02 AM
1

Yes, at 6 years old, he decided that he totally wanted the D. Mostly cause girls have cooties.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 01:25 AM
1

Well, but... their wording specifically included staff.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 01:23 AM
2

Eh. Depends on what side of the Conservative spectrum you're on and who's definition we're taking. I mean, if you're against gay marriage, or pro-compulsory prayer in school, or any of the other big ticket restrictions, I don't think you can say you're exactly pro-personal choice and/or liberty. Much the same, if you're against civilian gun ownership, you're probably not a very liberal liberal.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 01:20 AM
1

Compared to 80 years ago? Yes. Unless they're what we call "backwater Hicks".
/r/MensRights02/06/15 01:14 AM
1

Also a liberal. But, there are very few Conservative feminists, so there's that to consider.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 01:12 AM
3

The, um, biggest, most firmly dedicated ones are. The ones who really swallow everything he gives them.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 01:11 AM
5

Wait... is Canada OK with exclusionary hiring policies? Cause they totally said that's exactly what they're doing by only staffing Trans people and women on that day.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 12:52 AM
3

I'm totally cool with exclusive spaces... provided they are full time exclusive spaces. For example, the local women's only gym. There's actually a fairly decent one near me (Farm Town I used to live in had a Curves that was a bunch of Step masters, some rubber coated free weights, and a stationary bicycle, for $15/month. For about $90 on Craigslist, you could get better gear). And at no point would I think I'd be welcome in there. I also live near a women's spa. I also know, 24/7, that's not fo…
/r/MensRights02/06/15 12:46 AM
4

Yeah. You know what really makes me want to fuck women? Thinking of pounding one out with my mother. Nothing says hot like a 65 year old Portuguese woman. I mean, really, just a shit plan, even if you ignore the entire non-consensual part. Still not cool, but you'd figure if they really wanted to "cure" him, they'd maybe set him up with a really attractive woman. Or, you know, any woman with a vagina he wasn't already in.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 12:26 AM
1

Fair enough
/r/PussyPass04/05/15 01:41 PM
1

And? If men are dogs, and women still date them, how is this worse?
/r/PussyPass04/05/15 06:24 AM
1

And? Do you have a mouth? Do you have an ass? We're down...
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/15 05:53 AM
1

Well, it's difficult to rape with a wet rope.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/15 05:46 AM
2

Must be a German fetishist.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/15 05:19 AM
1

Fuck you. I will. Sends a message to other would-be criminals. Let's them know that while they are willing to put others in danger for self gain, I'm willing to kill them for enjoyment.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/15 05:10 AM
1

And if you're sitting in the back of a Jeep?
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/15 05:07 AM
1

Was she in first to start with?
/r/PussyPass04/05/15 04:50 AM
1

Wouldn't you? Retarded chicks are easy.
/r/PussyPass04/05/15 04:46 AM
2

Well, you can take the custodial party to court if you have evidence that the funds are not going to their intended purpose. For example, you send $350/month, and the kid is dressed in rags. But as I understand, you'd be suing for custody. Which, if the kid is being neglected, is the right thing to do.
/r/PussyPass04/05/15 04:31 AM
1

Well, but... if there was a boots and nails fund, then why is child support a concern?
/r/PussyPass04/05/15 04:27 AM
3

Actually, yes I do blame the union. I'm a non-union worker. What that means is that I actually have to be competent at what I do to keep my job. And yes. Yes I do blame feminism for putting those laws into motion. Not for a fucking moment did they think to protect the accused. Not for a god damned second did they accommodate for the basic fact that sometimes people are falsely accused out of spite. And if you ask the feminist movement at large, that's because it's so very rare. If you're any kin…
/r/PussyPassDenied11/03/15 06:35 AM
5

When they abuse it in the name of feminism, I very much can. Edit:moreover, I can blame the abuses that took place to force the law to slant on feminism.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/03/15 02:09 AM
1

Well, the attacks to the monstrosity that is that convict seem to be personal attacks. And your comment was not particularly relevant to the topic at hand. So, what am I too presume if not that you're defending the villain? It's OK. I like to play Devils advocate too, sometimes. I don't usually pick that vile of a person, though.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/02/15 06:52 AM
1

Not true at all. So, a rape case goes to court. Defendant is found not guilty, or acquitted for other reasons (say, lack of evidence). Then, there is sometimes another, completely separate case to determine if the accusation is false. The accusation has to be proven false, beyond a reasonable doubt. Hence, it's rare for actual convictions on that. And frustrating that they're so lenient.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/02/15 06:08 AM
2

Agreed. I'd say, in the interest of fairness, that once an accusation is proven false, the entirety of the case in question should be made public record.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/02/15 06:03 AM
1

Really? So, feminism didn't push for the laws that "protect" her by offering anonymity? Feminism didn't push for the laws that make defense from rape accusations virtually impossible? Feminism didn't want any of the more recent title IX bullshit?
/r/PussyPassDenied20/02/15 06:01 AM
1

Would it classify as a lesbian 3 way, if she could reach around the rolls to masturbate?
/r/PussyPassDenied20/02/15 05:56 AM
-1

Are you seriously defending an 11 time repeat offender?
/r/PussyPassDenied20/02/15 05:49 AM
2

Wonder if any were locked in on a mortgage. I can see being able to break a lease over incarceration. There's no fun way out of a mortgage.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/02/15 05:46 AM
1

Let's examine Oxford's definition of rape, and ask ourselves "does this apply to what she attempted to do to these men's lives?"
/r/PussyPassDenied20/02/15 05:44 AM
1

But that's rare if ever.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/02/15 05:41 AM
2

... She didn't get the book. She got a 16 month sentence after 11 fucking repeats of the same damn crime.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/02/15 05:40 AM
4

And she only got 16 months.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/02/15 05:37 AM
1

Hmm. Then you'd better do what you can to avoid that list. Like, say, not falsely accuse someone. By comparison, to get on the sex offender list, you could be some punk teenager who went streaking.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/02/15 05:37 AM
1

Ankle skin is for slags.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 02:43 AM
1

Well, if they referred to it as a "newspaper", they weren't aware of it enough to know it's a tabloid of the same type that kept us up on the current state of Satan's Military Conquest on DC 15 years ago. But I guess they're hard to tell apart anymore. Used to be, the one with Batboy and Alligator Man were clearly crap. Now they all do celebrity gossip.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 02:39 AM
1

I was actually there when I opened the comments. I mean, heaven forbid you not read a bloody tabloid.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 02:33 AM
1

Due directly to pressure from feminist rallys and lobbyists, the Duluth Model was enacted. So, um, yeah.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 02:23 AM
1

Yes. Selective service is bullshit. But it is the reality of the matter.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 02:21 AM
1

Except that no. That doesn't hold true.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 02:05 AM
2

So, the red pill folks will give you advice guaranteed to solve the problem: don't marry. Now that that's out of the way, let's move on to what to watch out for. If she's crazy passionate, she may be crazy. Passionate is good. Sexual is fun. Just watch out for crazy passionate. If it seems she's using sex to get her way, or to "keep you interested", you don't want none. If that's her means of judging if you still love her, you don't want to marry her. Alternately, if she's overly conservative no…
/r/MensRights21/01/15 10:55 PM
1

Desk numbers, and a bingo ball type lottery. Once a number has been pulled, it stays out for the remainder of the session. Only one chance to be called on per class, but it's compulsory.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 09:11 AM
1

And, of course, the solution to equalizing that privilege? Take an equal and open forum, and not only grant one person full and total privilege, but place the other at a severe disadvantage.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 08:43 AM
1

... and contribute to them looking like fools when they use it later.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 08:03 AM
3

No one bitches about the lack of diversity in Compton, or Harlem. But Bel Air...
/r/MensRights17/01/15 08:00 AM
1

No. Just thinking they're better than anyone else. I know several women adept at that.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 11:13 PM
6

I think they've got a fair shot. Special forces training isn't necessarily about being stronger or faster than the average enlisted. It's more about endurance, perseverance, wit, dedication, and the ability to handle extreme stress and limited sleep. None of those really place females at a natural disadvantage.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 10:01 PM
2

From the looks of things, because she did that with a lot of people. A lot.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/01/15 09:25 AM
1

Eh... a lot of folks weren't too fond of Mr King at the time.
/r/PussyPass16/01/15 09:08 AM
3

And don't forget about the bitching about the sub being taken over by men (despite that being seemingly completely false).
/r/PussyPass16/01/15 08:30 AM
1

Actually, in a good part of the US, 16 is the age of majority (old enough to sign contracts, etc). 18 is the federal voting age. I don't know of any States that extend voting rights to anyone under 18. 21 is the age in which you can purchase alcohol... But most states permit consumption of alcohol younger, if obtained legally (gifted by an of age friend or family member with no funds exchanged). So, really, in many states, you can "become a legal adult" 3 times.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 06:15 AM
6

Hey! So, how do you damage an already frail person, and still feel good about yourself? Like this.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 02:55 AM
9

Personally, I'd make a point of avoiding infected partners, protection or not. Even with a steel condom, I wouldn't stick my dick in a jar of nails.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 02:53 AM
1

Wait, are we now Debating that women are making more than us, in accordance with what she says? So, wage gap is done? We won!
/r/MensRights16/01/15 02:12 AM
1

I don't know. Maybe something like this. You know. Women joined together, working for a better future
/r/MensRights16/01/15 02:06 AM
1

A living male, eligible for parole, who wasn't actually a serial killer remains in prison. A female who actually, directly killed, repetitively, is slotted for release. No need to hypothesize about gender reversal.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 10:56 PM
1

Well, and it seems a lot of the problem is "patriarchy". Feminists are actively working to expand the definitions of assault and harassment to encompass anything they don't actively appreciate. Meanwhile, men being subjected to the effects of "patriarchy" are more inclined to a "no harm, no foul" and "don't start trouble" type attitude. And ya know, for years, it worked. Men who didn't start trouble were rare to find trouble. Men who were willing to forgive minor transgressions found they rarely…
/r/MensRights15/01/15 09:21 PM
1

No thanks. Sounds like the advice here is to deny ones own existence. To repress ones self before someone else can do it for me. I'll be having none of that. I was just advising a different take on civil disobedience. Otherwise, I like loving. I like being loved. I am still an animal, first and foremost. I will not be sterilizing myself without medical necessity. I fail to see that as beneficial to my situation. I am not a eunuch, and refuse to behave as one. I like lust. And I'm not interested …
/r/MensRights15/01/15 05:37 PM
4

OK guys, must mean it's time to fight back. So in essence, under these guidelines, if you're accused, you're fucked. Unless a claim is made that is so incredibly improbable that the board dismisses it ("I was gang raped in the middle of the quad at 2pm on a Tuesday, by the entire football team"), it seems like any claim will be treated as truth unless definitively proven otherwise... which will be borderline impossible. So, here's what we do: If you're at a school enforcing title 9, this one's o…
/r/MensRights15/01/15 09:13 AM
2

Bite me. I like San Francisco. Last thing I want is more whiney feminists moving there to get the jobs they want. Unless said jobs regard Street maintenance. Market could use some love.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 03:27 AM
6

She was denied her right to die just like any other person. This is why we need feminism.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 03:21 AM
3

"Why would someone give a confusing, bullshit answer to a confusing, bullshit survey?"
/r/MensRights15/01/15 03:06 AM
1

Seems to be in most states that police can't make the initial solicitation. They aren't supposed to, say, walk up to some random guy and offer to sell meth. However, if that guy asks if they know where to score, they can engage and claim to have a supply. At that point, they can't directly offer to sell. But if the guy asks about pricing, they can engage and haggle. The general idea being that they can't initiate an illegal dialog. But once the suspect initiates, they can play along as long as t…
/r/MensRights15/01/15 02:30 AM
1

Never ever, because all blanket statements are either completely true or entirely false.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 01:22 AM
2

Scientologists? Yeah. They've gotten away with some pretty scary shit.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 01:19 AM
2

Depends on what the disagreement is. Politics? No. That's ridiculous. The whole point is diplomacy. Football? Your grandchildren will feel your suffering.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 01:17 AM
1

True. But he was originally sentenced to death. Then California repealed the death penalty, reducing all death row inmates to "life in prison, with possibility for parole". When they reinstated the death penalty, they determined they couldn't revert to the death sentence punishments for those with the now reduced sentences.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 01:11 AM
1

But not about to be released. But quite frankly, that has more to do with who died, rather than the severity of the act.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 11:04 PM
2

While Charlie manson, who didn't actually kill anyone is where?
/r/MensRights14/01/15 09:46 PM
5

No. 86 surveyed. 73 final results.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 09:43 PM
2

Agreed. But I didn't hear anything about the women receiving medals either.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 03:21 PM
1

While the guy isn't the best worded fellow, in reality, he's not wrong. Do we all deserve medals every time we run from danger? Had they stood up and either defended fellow hostages, or attacked the hostage takers, then by all means. But otherwise, they just ran from danger. Nothing notably brave about it. No great service to the community.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 05:41 AM
1

I find it frustrating, because all our history is relatively recent. I couldn't expect a brit to know all the major events of the last 1000 years. That's ridiculous. But that Americans can list all the wars we've been in. Or even that we once owned the Philippines, and still own Guam and Puerto Rico (really. A lot of us think they're foreign counties). Hell, a guy I work with is married to a woman from the Philippines and didn't know it used to be US territory.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 03:46 AM
59

Of course. A good man is a dead man, right?
/r/MensRights13/01/15 10:24 PM
5

"If I have no free will, then how can I be morally culpable?! I wonder...."
/r/MensRights13/01/15 10:23 PM
2

Marriage; not even once. Meth; well, there's not much else to do on a weekday in Fresno, CA.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 10:18 PM
1

So, sorry for focusing on the trivial: your typo "viday games" made me think of "bidet" in the way it's pronounced. I want a game that cleans my ass while I play.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 10:10 PM
1

A notably famous case is Muhammed Ali. They damn near totally destroyed his career, because they refused to acknowledge his conscientious objector status. He's quoted with saying "ain't no Vietnamese ever called me a nigger."
/r/MensRights13/01/15 09:48 PM
3

As an American.... So, I was 7, and lived on a little Island in Indonesia. My stepfather was a metallurgist for an American company, working with an Australian company to make oil rigs for a Canadian company, using Indonesian labor. The Aussies and the Brits were fond of fancy dress parties. At one in particular, the idea was everyone had to pick a character, fictitious or real. The main event was for each person to act their part, while all others guessed who they were. I was dressed as Abraham…
/r/MensRights13/01/15 09:44 PM
17

So, anatomically exaggerated dolls would make more people go into porn, right?
/r/MensRights13/01/15 09:32 PM
1

Eh. Not much point. It's a pretty baseless list of things that father's supposedly do better. Though, most of them are things I learned from my mother... so, um, yeah. Actually, really digging to the core of the matter: don't strive to be better at being a parent than your partner. Strive to pick a better matched partner. I'd be lying if I said I was anything better than lucky, but the mother of my daughter is pretty awesome. She balances my weak points quite well.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 06:33 AM
3

Well, so... Seems you've decided the feminist viewpoint is your enemy. That's made quite clear by your tone. But, the key to properly defeating your enemy is to understand them. So, in essence, "the patriarchy" is just a concept. A nebulous idea, that can be described, but is ultimately intangible. There are aspects of it that ring true... But being nebulous in nature, some of the more extreme elements have stretched the concept to cover anything, encapsulating concepts that don't ring true. For…
/r/MensRights13/01/15 05:27 AM
3

Yep. That's right. Who better to blaze the way on reform than the victim's?
/r/MensRights13/01/15 03:18 AM
5

Wow. That was heavier than expected.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 03:17 AM
3

It's quoting the book 1984, wherein the totalitarian government maintains a state of ignorance by watering down language, reassigning the definitions of language, and brutally torturing anyone who dares to question their reign or think for themselves. Um, think "V for Vendetta" without V.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 02:59 AM
2

I think he just equated gender identity to totalitarian language manipulation. If so, I assure you, it's a unique viewpoint in this thread.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 02:27 AM
2

Agreed. While we rarely mention trans people by name, gender identity and expression is definitely respected in this space.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 02:26 AM
1

You'd have to paint it as pro-feminist to get any love. So, no "men's tears". And maybe "have 3 conversations on patriarchy, post to Twitter" and "spot 3 manspreaders, post them to Facebook". Basically, position it to encourage feminists to be more radically feminist and anti-Male... While using social media to let the world know how they really feel.
/r/MensRights12/01/15 09:17 PM
1

All day with my mind rape abilities. Every time I think of looking at a woman without her permission and constant consent.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 08:17 PM
3

No, no. Read it again. The 'better man' with that phrasing is easily angered by women.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 08:05 PM
1

Got it. So, basically, this guy is upset about a people talking about a thing that totally happened and was horrible, but doesn't put OP as a victim? OP is a FemRad.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 08:28 PM
5

I'm still confused by how the art exhibit relates. So, there's a mockup of a klansman, made out of news of racial violence. I'm not sure why this shouldn't exist. It seems a bit thought provoking. At least for the type of people who belong at universities.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 06:40 PM
1

OK. But again, if the line is different, then why do we need different punishments too?
/r/MensRights10/01/15 06:26 PM
4

Yeah. The topic is commonly touched on. And practically every time, we voice in the favor of free expression of gender identity. And the few times we don't, it's because we're parodying feminism.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 05:30 PM
2

I get the article. That's pretty self explanatory. But I don't understand your point.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 05:07 PM
2

I wasn't going to go that far... But it's kinda hard to say your idea is improbable.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 04:12 AM
2

Weird Al seems to be a comedian who uses satire in the same vein as Zappa did (well, Zappa was a talented musician who did comedy, Al is a talented comedian who does music). By the time you factor all things, I don't think he leans one way or the other. I'd be inclined to think he's on his side first.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 03:31 AM
1

Well, but there's the logical flaw: If men are willing to tolerate more in general, that would imply that a woman accused of sexual harassment would have crossed a bigger line.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 03:28 AM
4

So, the word I advised is "aggrowording". Expresses the hostility of their behavior, while not being gendered. I'd like to think we don't have to bash women as a whole to express frustration with feminists. Especially, considering many aren't female.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 01:37 AM
4

This show was filmed before an oppressed audience.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 01:11 AM
1

Whoa, hang on. Now you're accounting for individual personalities. Because, you know, there's no men who take offense to blunt and vulgar statements.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 01:10 AM
14

Working on the campaign slogans. Feminism: because encyclopedias don't have trigger warnings yet. Yet. Feminism: because reality is hard. But there's a place where you don't have to deal with it... Feminism: It's for the benefit if all genders. No boys allowed.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 12:32 AM
1

I don't believe it does benefit both genders. I see yet another stab at making sex crimes a trivial issue for women, and a travesty for men.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 11:53 PM
1

Aggrowording. It's non-gendered, not a direct insult, and by using "aggro" as the root, implies excessive hostility and expresses our frustration with the behavior.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 09:21 PM
2

Thank you. That was beautiful.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 09:15 PM
1

In the vaguest sense, maybe in a round abouts way.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 09:03 PM
1

So, the solution is the continuance of a legal system that's already lax on women as perpetrators, and doesn't take men as victims seriously?
/r/MensRights09/01/15 09:02 PM
1

On the bright side, it seems they share a murder charge. That's a solid start towards equality in punishment, and a punishment for false claims.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 04:42 PM
1

Come on. Zappa was way better looking. And didn't have the drunk slouch.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 04:38 PM
2

So, just to be clear, are you condoning inequity? Cause that seems to be precisely what you're doing.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 04:33 PM
2

Or... It could be that the world is tired of their regressive, narrow minded bullshit. Just a thought.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 11:44 PM
2

I appreciate the subtle stab at her intelligence. But requiring a house arrest and adult school, with 1 year probation or completion of a diploma, whichever occurs last...
/r/MensRights08/01/15 07:01 PM
7

A more modern and appropriate version would be "their".
/r/MensRights08/01/15 06:57 PM
4

Seducing your wife's brother isn't abuse. It's the start of a much needed conversation.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 06:48 PM
5

I think what he was getting as was a one-or-the-other deal. Either report all rape claims, or report all allegations found to be false.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 03:06 AM
14

It boils down to knowing they'll have more sway in the kangaroo courts. Especially since it's easier to stack a review counsel than an entire local government. When there's no jury, you just have to deal with a counsel in closed session. But heaven forbid they offer a 3rd option: utilizing the campus police and conducting actual investigations.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 03:04 AM
2

All sex on grounds will be held in the garden. That way, if she gets boring, you can invite her to visit a nearby brother. Also, you'll have greater chances of witnesses to affirmative consent.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 02:55 AM
4

OK. But a fair amount of the oil Barrons are second generation or more. How much did he have to start with?
/r/MensRights07/01/15 11:37 PM
1

What? They aren't all wealthy? Thought they had a joint ownership of the liberal media?
/r/MensRights07/01/15 11:31 PM
1

My question is how drunk was he? Was he able to give consent? Also, 3 times over the limit is 2.4% BAC, which is pretty fucking drunk.
/r/MensRights07/01/15 07:28 PM
0

Nah. Just a lobotomy patient. I'm not sure if I'm wearing pants at any given point.
/r/MensRights07/01/15 08:05 AM
1

OK. That's all fair and well. But what about the victim's of false Accusations?
/r/MensRights07/01/15 07:25 AM
2

You forgot to explicitly mention the part where there are more toilets for women than toilets and urinals together for men @ soldier field.
/r/MensRights07/01/15 07:16 AM
-2

They have a surgery now to help you get over being humiliated by your penis size, shape, etc. Makes it so you don't mind anyone looking. They call it "frontal lobotomy". Edit:You guys can really suck the fun out of some things.
/r/MensRights07/01/15 07:07 AM
2

I'm installing a wet bar in the men's restroom. In the women's, there will be an iron maiden.
/r/MensRights07/01/15 07:02 AM
4

OK. Those 2 cases weren't necessarily false. But what of the victims of proven false Accusations?
/r/MensRights07/01/15 06:53 AM
1

Made me think of a buddy who's mom died when he was 16
/r/MensRights07/01/15 12:47 AM
6

And now we know that the proper response is to clothesline the nut job and keep moving. Happy now, feminism?
/r/MensRights07/01/15 12:34 AM
16

Wow. That's fucking psychotic.
/r/MensRights06/01/15 10:44 PM
14

It's rare to see a man pursue an older woman openly. But I have seen it happen. I work with a man whose cough, cough "roommate" is in her mid 60s, while he's in his late 30s. So, it's not unheard of. Just not the most common arrangement. So far as the other way around, well, I live in Vegas. Give me 10 minutes, and I'll show you 20 examples. Edit: I'll stop at 20, because I don't want to make a hobby of watching short skirts chasing large wallets.
/r/MensRights05/01/15 10:18 PM
41

In many circles, to be unattractive is to be creepy.
/r/MensRights05/01/15 10:08 PM
3

No contest was the deal. Same as guilty. The differences are semantic.
/r/PussyPass05/01/15 08:39 AM
3

Bingo. I don't know of many women struggling to find jobs as finishing carps. But there's a lot of "what would cities look like if they were designed by women?"... which is a question we already know the answer to. Women in architecture is nothing new. I want to know what my Foundation would look like if it was poured by a woman. I want to know how my house would function if it was wired by a woman. As it stands, I've got a 100 amp master, but only 80 amps of of individual circuits... Your guess…
/r/MensRights05/01/15 06:26 AM
1

Well, soo... That means it was reported. Too insignificant to be policed by facebook's admins. You should watch your speech around her from this point forward, or consider your friend lost.
/r/MensRights05/01/15 06:18 AM
2

Well, fuck... so there it is, guys. Please resubmit your applications to Yale, MIT, and pretty much anywhere that isn't Harvard. My sympathies to those of you accepted by state schools.
/r/MensRights05/01/15 06:14 AM
3

Apologist! Just as bad as any murderer! I'll bet you slap angels and eat fairys too.
/r/MensRights05/01/15 06:09 AM
3

Guilty? Ha! Worse than that! He's unrepentant!
/r/MensRights05/01/15 04:19 AM
2

That's not staged! If it happened on camera, it's real. Just ask Agent 007!
/r/MensRights05/01/15 02:46 AM
3

So, you mean, basically men as they've always been known... Just with a more liberal view of "a woman's place"?
/r/MensRights05/01/15 02:42 AM
6

And don't forget, he's gotta have abs like a triple row of double speed bumps.
/r/MensRights05/01/15 02:41 AM
5

You never specified you weren't a murderer...
/r/MensRights05/01/15 02:38 AM
2

Both. It's definitely generalization. And the word "can't" is a lie. But yeah. I don't know of any protests for inclusion to blue collar jobs.
/r/MensRights04/01/15 08:22 PM
16

Like jobs and pay. Well, not your job, per se. High paying jobs, like CEO. On which note, I'm looking to start a small business selling mountain bike gear, primarily focused towards women (only because none of the local shops stock that gear, so minimal competition). If I just start my business as me, I'm on my own for a few years until I can get big enough for anyone to care. If I do everything in my girlfriend's name, however, there's a whole world of loans and other assistance.
/r/MensRights04/01/15 08:18 PM
9

Look... I'm not delving into a virtual world, filled with wonder and mystery, because of my love for people irl. I'm doing it because my character in Need for Speed doesn't talk. At all. Ever. That's nice. Hell, Capt. Price never whines about serving his role with a bunch of men. Soap didn't complain about the violence until the day he died. And none of the team griped about being sexualized, despite their rugged good looks. Basically, I like video games, because they build a world where I don't…
/r/MensRights04/01/15 01:21 AM
2

No. Really. It does not belong here. This sub is not so primitive in it's definition of what it is to be a man.
/r/MensRights04/01/15 01:03 AM
1

I'd bother to properly respond, if your content wasn't just fatshaming. Doesn't make our side look very good.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 04:20 PM
1

No reason for guilt. Just a hypothetical that aligns with SJW practices.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 02:20 AM
1

Exactly. Though, how much force is necessary is pretty subjective. A general rule of thumb is to strike back in a manner that allows retreat. If the assailant does not retreat, or has some manner of weapon, survive at any cost you deem fit.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 02:14 AM
1

I don't regret calling in sick from work, so I could pile everything my cheating ex girlfriend owns on the sidewalk then texting her "911" while she was in class to tell her we are sooo very and irreversibly done; and here's why.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 01:01 AM
0

Bear in mind, comics are written weeks before publishing. Unless they can come up with something notably better on short notice, they can't really replace it. Kinda hard to stay relevant and accurate with a process like that.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 04:06 AM
5

So, just a thought. Copy it, edit to reverse the gender of the other woman, post the fixed version, see the results. Then link every person shaming to the original.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 03:58 AM
10

I appreciate your point of view, and I'll take your side so far as men being told that they must be rescued on occasion. Because a born hero shouldn't be forced to take off the armour... But that's about where our agreement ends. I don't think the hero should have to be the male. Nor should the rescuee have to be female. And hell, some of us would rather be the dragon. I mean, sure, armour is cool. Yeah, princesses/princes are attractive. But I want black scales, and breath that begins infernos,…
/r/MensRights02/01/15 03:37 AM
3

Look. Let's just cut to the chase, buddy. What we're really getting at here is that we care more about how often your dog has sex and gets pregnant than we do about how many of your wives and girlfriends are abusing you. There. I feel much better being open and honest about it.
/r/MensRights01/01/15 01:13 AM
8

I definitely see a potential for a civil suit.
/r/MensRights31/12/14 07:24 PM
0

OK. Seems you have many comments sharing the same sentiment. Many of these horror stories are our struggle. These are as much our struggle as the horror stories of 2X, etc. Please, read through them. Understand that, as a man, if you are raped, especially through coercion, your ability to seek justice is inhibited by an imbalanced system. Know that if your significant other is a female, and she knocks the shit out of you, the SOP in some states is to take you to jail. And above all else, underst…
/r/MensRights31/12/14 08:08 AM
1

I don't know... Federal level seems to at least try to play fair (such as the FBI's definitions on rape. But since normally, these crimes are prosecuted on a state level, I think we're looking at uncharted territory.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 04:22 PM
4

Next stop, Slaponthewrist Station! All aboard!
/r/MensRights30/12/14 04:51 AM
1

Well, except this quote is missing it's context. It was a response to the "legitimate rape" bullshit. The one where the senator claimed that a woman's reproductive system shuts down in the event of rape, and therefore, pregnancy by rape is impossible.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 02:29 AM
1

Way to show an inability to consider concepts and viewpoints that aren't your own. The feminists would be proud.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 10:10 PM
1

35 days in jail. That's some hard time.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 09:45 PM
1

Lmao 2x downs syndrome.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 08:22 PM
2

On the other hand, the world is a cruel and vicious place. I'm not entirely sure how we'll change that if we can't talk about it.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 08:04 PM
1

Yeah. I mean, I honestly saw the action coming. But who took it was a bit surprising.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 05:30 PM
1

He lost more of his life than anyone should. But it's awesome to hear the conviction was overturned.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 04:18 PM
2

Huh. Never got to play as that character. Spent the whole 3rd one playing as Yuri.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 03:01 AM
6

The pretentiousness lost me at paragraph 4. Sorry. I tried.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 01:47 AM
2

Auto trigger hack warning.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 01:41 AM
2

Yeah. That's what they said after they did it. And they just kept doing it. The struggle is real.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 01:09 AM
1

Sorry. Have a hard time taking it seriously, when the accompanying video is in no way, shape, or form related... Maybe consider a podcast? Most good hosts allow for video casting, for when you have something that isn't just your character running around a virtual world with no real tie in.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 01:08 AM
3

Floating a contract against your wife doesn't count for domestic abuse stats either. So, there's that. And before you say "never heard of such a thing", my former land lord was accused of soliciting a contract on his wife and new born kid for $10k. The would-be merc went to the police, but the case was ultimately dismissed, as the sole witness was a felon Norteno gangbanger on parole. Though, I'm not sure what kind of hack job would be expected against a woman and child for $10k.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 12:55 AM
6

Rape is where you 360 no scope someone.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 12:46 AM
3

Yeah... But it takes some nit picking to find the real problems with the article. I mean, on the bit about raising kids, I'm kinda there too. My daughter has some very girly stuff (at the behest of one of her grandmothers). But I bias towards gender neutral stuff. And I would like her to go mountain biking with me, because landing a mean drop is awesome regardless of gender. And I think if her first car was a kit car that we built together, that would be the fucking sweetest ride ever. And she'd…
/r/MensRights23/12/14 10:40 PM
1

I mm going with the same position I'd hold against a woman. If you sign away your rights, fully aware of the consequences, then they're gone. Done. Be that through reproductive donation, or adoption. You can politely ask the legal parents. But there shouldn't be legal interference, spare to remind you that you signed away your rights. Much the same, the law shouldn't enforce child support claims against proper sperm/egg donors. But, just because the law sometimes does do what is wrong doesn't me…
/r/MensRights23/12/14 10:30 PM
1

That 97% for condoms is the "if properly applied". Otherwise, it drops to something like 85%
/r/MensRights23/12/14 10:10 PM
2

But insurance companies are dealing with truly anonymous people. Car insurance isn't so much for yourself. It's for all the people around you, like that jackass that swerves across 3 lanes to slam on his brakes in front of you. Health insurance isn't so much about how accident prone you are. It's about all the things that could possibly go wrong, and the many circumstances out of anyone's control, and in many circumstances, knowledge. The various forms of race insurance are a little different, s…
/r/MensRights23/12/14 07:21 PM
2

It isn't just gender. It's any ideology. Any time you put your facts against their ideas, or vice-versa, it will devolve into name calling, etc. Just the way it goes. For proof of that, debate religion or politics. Always goes the same way. The most success I've had is by starting any statement by sympathizing with whatever their view is and following with "But according to X, Y is Z. What's the deal with that?" Also, expect no love from Twitter. 140 characters is not enough to fully express any…
/r/MensRights23/12/14 05:25 PM
1

Actually, as a proponent of free speech and free expression, this makes me want to visit for the purpose of riding the public transit. In black BDUs, with no visible branding or insignia, and Jack Boots or 20 lace Martins or Grinders. All motion should be in a parade March, and all riding should be done at attention. Basically, doing nothing that can be considered "manspreading" or occupying more than the necessary amount of space, but still, very deliberately making others uncomfortable, withou…
/r/MensRights23/12/14 04:44 PM
2

I see a horrible human there... But it also seems she's getting run out of business for her actions and attitude. So that part is cool. Hope that ball was worth it.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 04:25 PM
1

First time I read the title at a glance, I interpreted speed as the slang for methamphetamine. I think the saddest part of that is that I wasn't notably surprised.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 04:16 PM
1

Premature ejaculations are caused by the oppressive patriarchy to oppress woman through oppression.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 04:14 PM
1

So, I finally became a dad at 29. I realized I was ready in the delivery room. But the reality is that I was ready before. Just didn't particularly want a kid just yet. If you're really not ready, then protection is in order. Your 2 most obvious options are to either learn to live with condoms (a little lube in the tip goes a long way), or stop having sex with her. Also of note, the pull-out method is actually 95% effective when properly practiced. Compare that to condom's 97%. Otherwise, obviou…
/r/MensRights23/12/14 04:12 PM
69

Eehhh... If we're just going by statistics, it holds. If we recognize that statistics don't represent the actions of individuals, it doesn't.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 02:27 PM
2

What I'm getting at is that they'd make this an uncomfortable space for us. And even in good faith, many of us are banned from their territory. The only hope of equality in the effort would be a new sub, with either a fascist mod who accepts nothing but good natured posts and comments... or a slacker mod and self policing. Either way, we've seen how their mods handle things. And it's not conductive of equality. I'm sorry, but I just don't think you can make peace with snakes. As gently as you ma…
/r/MensRights23/12/14 02:16 PM
1

OK. That's decent in concept. But consider this: a fair amount of us are banned from feminism, 2x, and similar subs, for a variety of reasons. Many of which boil down to "I don't want to read what you have to say, because you're a man". Our "opposition" likes to use such words as "mansplaining" to describe males views on any given situation. Most recently, they told us about "manspreading", to describe the way men sit, and frame it as an encroachment upon females... Somehow. Soo, maybe inviting …
/r/MensRights23/12/14 04:03 AM
3

I know how to find out: apply for it like you deserve it, have earned it, and are fully competent and capable of preforming the job responsibilities.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 01:42 AM
4

Yeah. So, the way it works is she'll get assigned a probation officer. Around the start of probation, she'll go to the probation office for an introduction and review of her probation contract. It'll include the basics, no drugs, inform the officer of any prescriptions and special medical situations (some medications are opiates, and therefore would show up as dirty for heroin, opium, etc), advise her against poppy seed products (same reason), no alcohol (loosely enforced), no weapons (special p…
/r/MensRights23/12/14 01:27 AM
2

OK... But female empowerment doesn't necessarily mean male disempowerment. To specifically recognize these women doesn't mean that men will suddenly be forgotten. Seems they've actually made some pretty awesome career choices, and accomplishments regardless of gender. I'd rather see these women elevated to hero status than Anita Sarkastihgddjhfdsa or whatever her name is.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 01:02 AM
2

I'll take that and run with it. It also seems that without an adversary to fight against, the feminists desperately strike at anything. Blacks had the KKK and clear and defined racists. So, demonize their actions, show themselves to be legitimate victims in the situation of racism, and push for a stronger community to better strive for a unified community. Feminists seem to be trying all the actions... But they lack the clear and defined adversary. So you wind up with a bunch of people striking …
/r/MensRights23/12/14 12:02 AM
3

Agreed. I mean, if it's that big of an issue, then this seems like a reasonable solution.
/r/MensRights22/12/14 08:42 PM
4

Moreover, to specifically deny that lying and cheating are abusive.
/r/MensRights22/12/14 04:31 AM
1

Ah. It would seem that way. Noted and removed.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 11:26 PM
1

Yeah. Shocking that 2x would be curiously selective about which comments fly, and which are worthy of a ban.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 11:13 PM
2

I hate how close to reality this is.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 03:20 AM
1

Well, with the dirty bomb issue, it's more of a digital or mechanical fuse warning. With 9/11, it's a... huh, um, oncoming vehicle warning?
/r/MensRights19/12/14 03:18 AM
2

So, hold the camera parallel to the ground, level with your collar bone. No matter the zoom, you'll look a little taller. Also of note, Bruce Willis is about my height (5'8"). His frame is actually about that built, tone, and smooth. He's just shorter in person. Really nice guy, though.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 02:03 AM
2

Lol. Nah. Just tell them you're 5'16".
/r/MensRights19/12/14 01:58 AM
1

As a guy (blessed and cursed, depends on when you ask) with 8.5, I have actually found one of these size Queens. She mentioned on several occasions that if I came up short, she would laugh and walk out. Well... When it came down to it, we were in doggy, and she said I was too deep. Totally turned me off, and I had to stop. Led to a beautiful moment, though. She asked me why I stopped and what was wrong with me. I got to look her dead in the eye with disappointment and say "actually, it's not me.…
/r/MensRights19/12/14 01:57 AM
2

... and every time you hug... Just right there.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 01:50 AM
1

The best part of waking up is foldiers in your butt.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 01:48 AM
1

Look. This isn't a complex situation. You are looking to condone violence as a response to words. Specifically for unintelligent people. I think that's the be all, end all here. Complicate it with semantics all you like, that is what it is. Your position does not warrant sympathy, because it condones escalating a non-violent situation into a violent situation. I'm sure there is a solution to the problem. But I promise you, it's not that. And I love that you act like 1 hit is all that will ever h…
/r/MensRights15/12/14 08:31 PM
1

Nice! Yeah. Freedom of speech can fucking blow them
/r/MensRights15/12/14 04:52 PM
1

So, you're saying it's OK for stupid people to hit other people, because they don't know how to stand up for themselves without violence? I mean, seriously, I can't imagine that's what you're actually arguing in favor of. Bullies of any type should be shunned, obviously. And any person with sound intellect should take the responsibility to step in and settle the issue. But it's also the responsibility of the person ill equipped for a battle of wits to step away.
/r/MensRights15/12/14 04:28 PM
2

You can ask the mods to reinstate you. But because reddit doesn't actually enforce freedom of speech, they don't have to give you any type of reason for your ban. They have total control, and abuse it.
/r/MensRights15/12/14 02:40 PM
2

Nice! Took me a few months to earn a 2x ban last time.
/r/MensRights15/12/14 02:39 PM
1

Don't you love those reports? It only becomes a problem when women are found in the wreckage. Not that I'm saying it's OK to kill non-combatants. http://jonathanturley.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/mummybomberl_468x468.jpg
/r/MensRights14/12/14 03:26 PM
7

Agreed and noted. Boys and men get lumped in as part of the general community of victims. Women and girls have their own identity. Fuck. That. Noise.
/r/MensRights14/12/14 02:45 AM
12

Was about to note, not only do they want to make it a women's issue, they want to specifically dismiss the male element. They had no problem rubbing in that prepubescent girls were raped. But when it's boys too, gender isn't relevant, really.
/r/MensRights14/12/14 01:56 AM
5

Lol. Rapid-fire triggering while listening to Lollipop Lust Kill.
/r/MensRights13/12/14 11:52 PM
2

What gets me is that the whole article is stating this like it's some sort of valid study, despite the quote clarifying that "look, this is a joke, pulled from a book you find in the humor section. There's a lot of reasons the information gleaned is inaccurate."
/r/MensRights13/12/14 09:22 AM
1

Well, in the case of jezebele, the pot seems to be using a word beginning with "n"
/r/MensRights13/12/14 09:20 AM
4

True. Moral: don't bone drunk chicks. They may be fun now, but they might be a prude in the morning.
/r/MensRights13/12/14 01:11 AM
1

Your massive, throbbing martyrdom-erection is imposing on my rights as a black transgendered lesbian.
/r/MensRights13/12/14 01:08 AM
1

Horny? I didn't see much objectification. But I do see a bunch of scary faces that seem to be male...
/r/MensRights13/12/14 01:02 AM
1

You still owe child support. Because you don't owe it to your wife, you owe it to your daughter. Otherwise, take her to court, and let them know about what's going on. Children are not a pay-to-play game. Doesn't matter if you're back 7 years on child support. Your rights as a parent are not at her discretion.
/r/MensRights13/12/14 12:51 AM
1

Sure as fuck not with your fists. That's only a first resort for mental midgets.
/r/MensRights13/12/14 12:23 AM
12

OK. Ya know what? For the sake of being a hostile asshole, I'll play by those rules. No sex unless I get express consent. But if we head back to my place, with the understanding that it's for sex, and she isn't capable of expressing consent, or changes her mind, it's time to get the fuck out. It's my responsibility to not rape. It's not my responsibility to babysit an adult. And, considering the current state of things, I strongly advise that policy to all the college boys. That seems to be the …
/r/MensRights12/12/14 05:59 PM
1

I think the FemRads are interested in spreading the victim status. Ever mention the idea of severely injuring, or killing a rapist in self defense on a feminist friendly sub? Fuck, mention basic self defense, and you're slut shaming, and women shouldn't have to defend themselves, and the idea of preparing for any kind of self defense is ridiculous and shouldn't be necessary.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 07:28 AM
18

In their minds, there was no bubble bust. This only further proves the existence of rape culture. Somehow.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 06:05 AM
1

Then, surely, they are a vital organization to invite to the next million man March. We all want equality here. Unless your gay. They still don't like gays.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 04:42 AM
2

Yeah. That's pretty fucked up.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 04:39 AM
1

Oh, Shit. I just got a new interview tactic. "We offer a menstruation leave program, but you'd have to opt in. If you do, you will be required to take those 2 days, and your workload will be picked up during that time by your coworkers. Would you like to sign up for that?" Anyone that says yes doesn't get the job. And it's not because they're female, it's because they aren't team players.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 04:24 AM
1

Japan is on par with the rest of the industrial world, and South Korea is not far behind. Indonesia is a bit behind, though.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 04:19 AM
1

FemRads, maybe?
/r/MensRights11/12/14 04:17 AM
1

So, basically... Like Bruce Willis. Kidding. Bruce is actually a really nice guy. Easy to work with.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 04:12 AM
1

Well, but they're opening enrollment to include African-Americans, and Hispanics... Just saying.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 04:05 AM
1

Well, but... As a good friend, she shouldn't mention her friend's names. If there is a sexist subculture going on, having their names in print associated with that statement would do no favors. But I do acknowledge that the bulk of major motion pictures are directed by men. That said, I think it has a fair amount to do with who you know and how aggressively you're willing to force them to know you. I have a good female friend who's a designer. But she has a hard time getting gigs she's more than…
/r/MensRights10/12/14 06:13 AM
1

Adding to that, let's not forget the feminists who think men should not be feminists, or if they are, that they should be in silent support. Feminists only believe that it's also about men's issues when they're cornered, and realize they'll look like the villain if they don't.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 05:26 AM
1

Ouch. "I see you have your MBA from Stanford. Seems you've also volunteered distributing medical aid in Africa. But what really catches my eye here is that you say you're a 34DDD."
/r/MensRights18/09/14 03:29 AM
1

Wow. Very well put. In general, I don't sympathize with MRAs any more than I sympathize with FemRads, as both are commonly full of shit... But this was really pretty fair.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 03:19 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter