TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

theBrineySeaMan Archive

View 0 posts and 37 comments by theBrineySeaMan on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-7

ACAB
/r/MensRights26/09/19 10:03 PM
-8

As usual this sub is would rather be outraged than think or do research. The USMNT joined to call bullshit in the numbers, which makes sense since it's taken this long to come up with accounting to make pay seem fair. The biggest point to me is that the men's club has received little prize money for world cup wins while the women have won two straight in the period so the union is factoring prize money in since it suits them. If the men had more prize money it would be accounted away as not part…
/r/MensRights31/07/19 06:23 PM
4

It also factors in FIFA prize money, which, if the men's team was better, would escalate their numbers dramatically. The USMNT came out calling this bullshit accounting as well.
/r/MensRights31/07/19 06:00 PM
-8

This started too late. He's in her space at the start, what prompted the whole thing.
/r/MensRights06/07/19 05:40 AM
1

So do you think Jeremy Corbyn will become PM at the next GE?
/r/MensRights27/05/19 03:32 AM
15

No one is talking about mortgage/rent
/r/MensRights14/05/19 02:16 AM
1

What about her boobs?
/r/MensRights09/04/19 07:52 PM
4

Have you ever drank before? One of the biggest side effects of alcohol is "lowered inhibitions" and while I know we judge the situation differently (a drunk driver is responsible, but a drunk sexer isn't,) it's important to remember that the person is impaired, and the decision to get further so is made by an impaired person. I think this is one of the main reasons we get mad at someone driving drunk, the sober them should have prepared for this possibility, but a sober person can't predict they…
/r/MensRights21/03/19 08:20 AM
4

No, not small penis \/ big vagina. That thing was like the grand canyon
/r/MensRights09/02/19 04:11 AM
-5

Terrible audio production. I couldn't focus on your point because all I could hear was the over-production and how parts with voiceover had ambiant sound while the rest did not.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 12:22 AM
3

I know it's a joke, but that could be a factor. I work with a lot of women who just ask men to lift for them when they get a heavy load, but I used to work with women who took their own heavy loads with proper form. Obviously carrying one heavy load won't make you stronger, but doing it every day probably will.
/r/MensRights23/12/18 09:08 AM
2

What is your definition of feminism then?
/r/MensRights09/12/18 04:01 AM
11

If it were still egalitarian feminism like Debeouvoir, but that's just not the case
/r/MensRights08/12/18 08:26 PM
2

What, do you not shit at work? That's like the best part of the day.
/r/MensRights01/12/18 12:47 AM
8

Eh, I support both maternal and paternal leave. I guess I'm the only one here who likes parents to parent their children.
/r/MensRights01/12/18 12:47 AM
1

I'm a little confused what the first video has to do with Marxism.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 07:57 AM
1

There's a great irony involved. De Beauvoir rejects communisms' claim that the women, the "second sex" will receive equal treatment when the revolution comes, and yet years later we see feminism producing the same claims Simone rejected. They ask that men wait for their day after the "feminist revolution," and while I understand where things lie, I'd also ask they don't forget where they came from.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 11:34 PM
3

There's a great irony involved. De Beauvoir rejects communisms' claim that the women, the "second sex" will receive equal treatment when the revolution comes, and yet years later we see feminism producing the same claims Simone rejected.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 11:27 PM
1

For an aspiring writer that title looks clunky.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 06:14 PM
1

What? Those are completely unrelated. The former is a relationship between law and ethics, while the latter is a question of perception. Additionally, Johnson and Obama don't want these people to be considered illegal, they are proposing granting legal status. Law and Ethics try to coincide, but pragmatism prevails in law: I.e. A man has to pay for a child that isn't his to make sure Someone is paying for the child. Meanwhile the fact that '"illegal" immediately associates ethical wrongdoing' is…
/r/MensRights14/10/17 10:48 PM
0

Firstly, they are talking about an order which takes these people from undocumented/illegal status, and encourages documentation by giving legal status. But the point is not their status, which both methods of address fully cover but the term being used. We know in the wake of Frank Luntz that the phrasing is SUPER IMPORTANT, his contribution to the political landscape was testing out different ways of saying the same thing to achieve a desired affect: Climate change vs. Global Warming. Undocume…
/r/MensRights14/10/17 06:29 AM
2

What? The interviewer is being an idiot, and making a point about something that he's wrong about. If we're going to really talk about it, Johnson's framing is equally as accurate since the majority of undocumented immigrants are people who stay past their visa expires, so they aren't "illegally entering the country" as he puts it, they are staying without proper documentation. What GJ is saying is that the term "Illegal Immigrant" is the type an asshole like Frank Luntz comes up with, one that …
/r/MensRights14/10/17 03:26 AM
11

The one thing no one in there asks is if he an his ex talked about kids. They blame him for "wasting her fertile years" (ages 27-34) but if they didn't talk about kids before they were married then that's just as much on her, if not more so.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 06:55 AM
4

There should probably be a conversation about the purpose of school. Obviously at the premiums they charge for higher education, there needs to be a practical use, but the original purpose of these institutions was to foster thinking and discussion, not a bunch of people sitting and copying thoughts without thinking.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 08:08 AM
0

Don't tell me, you also think the commies are trying to indoctrinate the students
/r/MensRights03/06/17 05:34 AM
10

I think that would be an interesting psychology or philosophy class: You could explore ways of knowing the self and identity, as well as concepts in attraction.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 05:24 AM
2

There's an episode of Louie like this. He mentions how he sucks when he doesn't have his daughters and doesn't do anything but Jerk off and sleep.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 07:18 AM
2

So my Nephews live with my brother in Virginia during School, but they come back and live with their mother in New Mexico for June and July. There's no court order in effect, so what is the legal definition for this arrangement?
/r/MensRights25/05/17 07:06 AM
2

Thanks for letting us know to unsubscribe.
/r/PussyPass14/03/17 10:33 AM
4

Yeah, WTF is this? Pussy pass is about a difference in the realm of Justice, not trying to set back women's rights.
/r/PussyPass02/03/17 08:34 PM
15

While yes, it is; the man taking more years for the murder is an idiot. It was not his place to dispense justice, and he was dumb enough to act as her pawn instead of letting her deal with it. In fact, this case is telling of the way that, despite how feminists see "rape culture" women still may rely on men to dispense punishment, which seems telling of how they view those men in their lives.
/r/PussyPass16/07/16 11:14 AM
6

3rd wave is part of the ultra PC bullishit they arose during, with Tipper Gore banning music and such. They really only found success because the treatment of LGBTQ was pretty bad, and they pulled that crowd into the fold. 1st and 2nd wave both would agree to the LGBTQ stuff, but this radical anti-male nonsense would not be kosher.
/r/PussyPass16/04/16 07:28 PM
3

"umm.. READ THE DICTIONARY FEMINISM IS ABOUT EQUALITY!!" Not since the first wave. Sure De Buvoir was about egalitarianism, but subsequent generations abandoned that focus.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 10:51 PM
1

In certain fields, that is really all that the post shows.
/r/MensRights04/01/16 07:01 PM
10

While this may be the case, Contemporary Feminism is not working to remedy this. There may be a few left-over egalitarian first-wavers, but the current crowds are deconstructionists and critical theorists who have no time of day to discuss the problems facing males not in privilege. Any time someone comes along to discuss these men the current crowd attacks them as misogynistic, and tries to prevent them from speaking.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 09:06 PM
1

The reality is inevitable starvation of mind and body. It's funny because they would charge that capitalism leads to this same effect, only they would add the soul.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 09:00 PM
-2

As neither a creationist nor an evolutionist, I find your remakrk both disturbing, and a bad Metophor.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 04:28 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter