TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

the_gr33n_bastard Archive

View 1 post and 84 comments by the_gr33n_bastard on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

So ironic
/r/MensRights25/03/17 03:49 PM
2

No. Feminists overreact about men resting their legs in natural body positions. This sub is reacting to YOU being a fucking dufus. Get the fuck outta here.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 04:32 PM
1

No worries, weren't accusing you of that. But this is kind of exactly what I'm talking about. He wasn't talking about his cock lol. He was talking about his Hugh Mungous gut. Zarna is closer to being a sexual assaulter for her misconception of this and her fixation on his genitals. Like fuck, it's probably a joke he likes to tell people to make fun of himself. If anyone actually did side with Zarna after watching the video, they'd be crazier than the cunt herself.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 06:59 PM
8

I mean, ask yourself who is more emotionally upsetting/offputting to you. A man self deprecating about his own weight problems, or a woman shrieking incessantly about sexual harassment/assault to said man?
/r/MensRights21/03/17 03:41 PM
3

She'll be making a complete fool of herself to all the people who don't already associate her with psychopathy.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 03:39 PM
1

Jesus. Good to hear everything is cleared at least.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 11:19 PM
2

Just double checking, man; you only mentioned it being a trial. I hope it turned out ok.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 07:46 PM
5

Neither of them deserved to win. They're both total cretins, really.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 05:21 PM
2

Says who?
/r/MensRights19/03/17 02:58 PM
25

Probably not. But who are you to judge? People commit suicide when they aren't in the right head space so what do you know? I know for myself when I am depressed, shitty feminism and maleness being attacked in the media makes me angrier than pretty much anything else. Existential crisis is a huge contributer to why one would kill themselves, so everyday seeing ths bullshit racist/sexist stuff about white males in the media certainly contributes at least a little bit. Everyone is different though…
/r/MensRights19/03/17 02:56 PM
13

This was a case of false accusation?
/r/MensRights18/03/17 05:17 PM
28

Gladly. It seems most are from FDNY so don't take it as a universal thing. It's also pretty rare, mind you, but it's the sentiment that counts. http://nypost.com/2015/05/03/woman-to-become-ny-firefighter-despite-failing-crucial-fitness-test/ http://nypost.com/2015/12/27/unfireable-female-firefighter-returns-to-the-fdny/ http://nypost.com/2015/11/22/struggling-firefighter-injured-after-just-10-days-into-new-job/
/r/MensRights13/03/17 09:09 PM
10

Even when they fail the tests, some women are still given the job, displacing men that do pass the tests.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 08:07 PM
1

You mean its supposed to work? Certainly makes masturbating easier but the will do it usually trumps all.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 03:18 PM
0

The mitochndria is the powerhouse of the cell.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 03:00 AM
1

I wouldn't chastise someone for doing it, but I'd advocate them not to. But yes it should be banned until the person is a legal adult.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 12:48 AM
1

Circ is MGM. FGM also goes by 'circumcision'. It's all semantics bit the point is that any circumcision is mutilation of the genitals.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 12:47 AM
2

I'm aware of different FGM practices that either cut off the clitoris, its hood, the labia or some combination of that. I'm not equating them in terms of effect, I'm equating them with respect to how they're both forms of mutilation which is inherently wrong. Obviously cutting off the clitoris is worse but that practice is pretty rare compared to about 50% of newborn males being circumcised in North America to this day. So no, what I said isn't retarded, I think you're just kinda triggered.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 12:45 AM
2

You're retarded. Look up mutilation in the dictionary. That should have been step one.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 12:41 AM
3

I would to each his own but that would be that would conceding to your stupidity. It's a huge deal wether you think so or not but I guess I can't convince you of that. I bet you're one of those death bed ethicists.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 08:21 PM
0

That's the thing with identity politics: it's always going to be political.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 08:03 PM
6

Yeah I suppose without instruction pretty much every guy will figure it out anyway that the thing moves, and is supposed to move. It's not there for no reason.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 08:02 PM
3

But thr context you're providing is that of sheer ignorance which is not really a good excuse. And you're TRYING to contribute to that ignorance, then get mad at me for not being accepting of ignorance, and cuss us out for your lack of understanding....
/r/MensRights11/03/17 08:00 PM
3

I'm not about apologize to you for a non feminist calling themself one. Nor am I going to stop calling them all feminists. That's a issue of the movement itself. Don't shoot the messenger, I'm just trying to make srnse of it. At least I'm distinguushing between good 'feminists' and bad 'feminists'. You can at least appreciate that part, thank you very much. I'll try to use quotations from now on.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 07:58 PM
3

Yeah, I don't mean to sound generalising, but referencing feminism with respect to double standards regarding circumcision isn't really imcorrect. Feminists say all sorts of things because everyone tries to be one without realising you don't have to be one. But if an ideology declares itself the arbiter of equality, any lack of equality is fair game for criticism. They should view this criticism witj adoration, they do strive for equality do they not? It's not my fault a person lies about being …
/r/MensRights11/03/17 07:54 PM
7

The outcome is not moot. You're a fucking moron. The child's agency over his genital mutliation is not his parents', regardless if the outcome is moot. You're a fucking moron. My names not fuckin' bubbles it's the green bastard from parts unknown Get the fuck outta here.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 07:27 PM
3

I don't know why you're getting downvoted. Self-declared feminists are the ones that affected the change of moniker from 'female circumcision' to 'female genital mutilation' because of how it "limits sexual function and is done during adolescence". Then in the same paragraph will claim that feminism supports men's rights too, but that "circumcision [of the foreskin] isn't that bad though, and it actually helps you clean it and might even prevent getting STDs". They wanted it called FGM, then don…
/r/MensRights11/03/17 07:19 PM
15

If anything, that's like 80% the reason why they exist; to protect the glans.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 07:08 PM
1

Shut the fuck up and get out of here you fucking hypocrite moron.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 07:07 PM
12

You have a vacuous mind. Male circumcision would have originated in african and asian cultures, probably for 'cleanliness' as well as a rite of passage after iron knives were invented/introduced, and has since been co-opted for various ceremonies and ritualistic purposes. Western society adopted the practice and it became increasingly popular with increased popularity of christianity. This was largely under the promise of preventing religious parents' sons from masturbating (sinning), and so was…
/r/MensRights11/03/17 06:59 PM
32

Feminists (run of the mill, regular women) will sometimes argue with you as to why male circumcision is essentially ok, because according to them it doesn't compare at all with female circumcision. I'd say this comic somewhat nails that too.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 06:38 PM
20

I'd argue that you're full of shit.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 06:34 PM
11

Male circumcision has the SAME connotations in other parts of the world. And if you want anecdotes, I probably didn't fully retract my foreskin until like age 6 or 7. My penis is totally fine. None of the invalid points you're making are saying anything about why curcumcision is ok. Just stop George. You don't know what you're talking about.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 06:29 PM
23

J. H. Kellogg was not a smart man.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 06:26 PM
38

It's one thing to be complacent in mythology. It's a different story when you begin regurgitating the myths you've been conditioned with. Circumcision is male genital mutilation, period; aesthetics and sensitivity are merely caveats to the quality of circumcision being straight up mutilation of a newborn's penis. If you can't see why that's fucked up, you might as well hang out at r/againstmensrights, you'll fit right in.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 06:08 PM
3

I'd say there are departments like that which exist such as philosophy or psychology or social science in general but yeah, not nearly as immutable as feminism's ivory tower.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 08:24 AM
5

And toast to benevolent sexism they do in the dark corners of their minds. They don't care that the world puts them first, no one's going to do anything about it if feminists all subconsiously enjoy benevolent sexism; they're the only ones capable of making the necessary changes. It's all a game and it's gotten past the point of no return for academic challenging since the advent of the internet. It's definitely because of a reluctance of people that would normally speak out but don't out of fea…
/r/MensRights23/02/17 04:08 AM
7

No one pretends that hard. Doesn't mean they are necessarily stupid people. Humour the following metaphor if you will: Pretty much everyone has a hole to fill in life, except for feminists, it's more of a crater, made by a feminism grenade, and they're also trying to fill the hole with more grenades. It's a self-fulfilling prophecy.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 03:45 AM
5

Ohh but they have their own stats for bolstering purposes. Then again, the stats only get them as far as people's capacity for gullibility. Feminists use stats, but I don't think they like to as I'll explain below. Your latter points are probably true in some cases as well. We have to rememer that any movement is comprised if unique individuals, albeit with very similar motivations, but the exact incitation or impetus for the motivation varies even on a person by person basis. Needless to say it…
/r/MensRights23/02/17 03:33 AM
8

I think the problem is that they genuinely disagree that their theories are horseshit. Au contraire; they think their theories are ingenious.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 02:49 AM
6

Saving this comment for the last part. Spot on mate.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 11:40 PM
26

Because the underlying assumption that's been propped up by feminist discourse is that something to the tune of: "since men effectively only comprise the upper tiers of social privilege, advocating for further rights is not only unnecessary, but is also slanderous to the cause of feminism" (and therefore women as a group). Feminsts know exactly how to abuse the emotions of women and it's so sad because the outcome is that while men's rights activists necessarily must target dubious feminist ideo…
/r/MensRights22/02/17 11:35 PM
2

I'd like to point out that the safe haven laws began after mothers were comitting infanticide. This is why we need birth control and abortion. Women will simply dispose of a baby or a give away if they can't support it. On the flipside, if you're a man and separated from your new child for whatever reason, child support is basically preventing the child from being killed or becoming a burden on the system and whose future will probably not be bright. The most important action you can take in you…
/r/MensRights20/02/17 08:25 AM
3

If we're so horrible and valueless that were deserve eradication, why are they always trying to get men to be believe their bullshit? I'll tell you why. Because it isn't about actually eradicating men, at all. It's about inciting anger in men which can usually be later held accountable to the men, defaultly by the mainstream media. E.g. Anita Sarkeesian says video games make men misogynists. Gets criticized. But the only people who actually receive retribution are men, because a few of us can't …
/r/MensRights17/02/17 12:59 AM
1

Can you not see that those are the talking points I intended to raise with this post? Christ take it eady on yourself. Those questions are implicit in the post title. The title is the way it is because it gets clicks. Lay off, please.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 02:55 AM
1

Yeah I thought the bitch one was uncalled for too. And you do realize the rhetorical stuff was, well, rhetorical.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 02:51 AM
2

What's not civil?
/r/MensRights15/02/17 02:25 AM
1

Hmph. It's never too late you know.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 02:25 AM
1

I already addressed that, albeit rhetorically and it went over your head. shrug
/r/MensRights15/02/17 02:03 AM
2

Just be happy you're even allowed to comment here. If this were r/feminism and the tables were turned, I would have been banned before you could have even replied. In fact that can't ever happen because I was banned for a more inocuous comment than yours. My first comment on the sub, 15 minutes after posting. So quit snarking at me.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 01:59 AM
1

I'm not saying it's your fault. Everybody kind of hates men. Don'take it personally.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 01:56 AM
3

Whooooooooossshhhhhhh
/r/MensRights15/02/17 01:42 AM
26

Pretty much. Another way to read it is, "Out of X number of people, Y number of people that matter were affected." Exact same thing as when you see, "...yada yada yada they even killed women and children." Or equally, "Explosion kills 100, including 20 women and 5 children." The implication is always the same; that males are disposable. Gender equality describes the state of men and women receiving equivalent opportunities, unless of course it's being described by a feminist in which case they w…
/r/MensRights15/02/17 01:02 AM
1

For what other reason would they exclude 300 vulnerable drug addicts from nice cozy beds?
/r/MensRights15/02/17 12:44 AM
1

One more thing. Now you claim to know nothing about this issue. So is your opinion really worth anything? No. You just kinda hate men and you don't realize it. Introspect, please.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 12:25 AM
1

Correct.
/r/MensRights14/02/17 11:00 PM
3

Ok. Then shut the fuck up about equal pay. Shut the fuck up about STEM. STFU about unconvicted rape. STFU about female circumcision. Give up your right to vote. Give up your right to own property. Give up your right to enter politics. Give up your right to have an abortion. Basically just erase every major feminist accomplishment ever because saying "but what about..." just doesn't do justice, you know. I'm going to need some peer reviewed evidence saying that women are equal to men. All you're …
/r/MensRights14/02/17 11:00 PM
14

It might not be up to your standards since the genders are not reversed, but nice try. I want to hear your compelling evidence as to why women should receive disproportionate assistance in this case. Apparently you know more about it than I do considering your condescension. Edit: I wasn't even making an argument. Notice the question mark looking symbol?
/r/MensRights14/02/17 09:22 PM
4

More like 5 to 1. Men make up 81%
/r/MensRights14/02/17 08:34 PM
1

Don't be ridiculous. Unless your buying sickly 20 dollar crack-addiction-having whores you're not saving money, and at that point it isn't even worth the money.
/r/MensRights14/02/17 08:18 PM
2

"I made up some bullshit about the MRAs I never talk to and I want you to hear it."
/r/MensRights14/02/17 08:02 PM
5

Shit post. The poster is not sexist, it's just reminding people of their rights. It's not depicting the man as the rapist its just showing drunk people hooking up. There are much better examples of sexist anti-rape posters.
/r/MensRights14/02/17 07:50 PM
28

When straight men objectify women as sexy, it's unconsensual and uncalled for; men only like women for sex. When straight women objectify men, it's a healthy decision women use to express their jest and sexuality. The implication being that women are not actually sexual, but when they act like it towards anyone, it's totally excusable because women are the ones who choose their mate, anyway! Whereas for the men, the implication is that their sexuality is not up to them; so what if someone catche…
/r/MensRights09/02/17 03:39 PM
5

She is basically just the american euivalent of Anders Behring Breivik. Completely devoid of remorse, constantly trying to exploit society and the legal system to further encroach on what it means to be guilty, and what it means to be a victim. These are broken humans.
/r/MensRights24/01/17 07:26 PM
1

I got banned 16 minutes after posing a question in good faith about the practicality of affirmative action (not breaking rules). Obviously they are still going to ban you for disagreeing; they're a bunch of emotionally motivated pseusdintellectual babies who care more about whetherxor not people believe them, than truth itself. It is for this exact reason why I oppose them as vehemently as I sometimes do. It's totally wrong, yet under the name of equality; this makes it even more wrong. Luckily …
/r/MensRights19/12/16 12:18 AM
1

That's what it boils down to isn't it? They campaign on the intrinsic value of equality, and then scoff when they get it. Anyone who does that is a cunt.
/r/MensRights05/12/16 05:33 AM
26

starts equality movement reaches equality "FUCK WOOPS."
/r/MensRights03/12/16 02:36 PM
2

Jesus. Not only is the orginal article a steaming pile of hot off the typewriter bullshit. There isn't a single reference to even non peer-reviewed research and the author is prescribing wholesale misandry as advice. Literally misandry = advice. This edited version of this article is very important because it accomplishes exactly what it is supposed to. As men, one way people might notice problems we face is by relegating instances of unfair treatment to other politically significant groups of p…
/r/MensRights24/11/16 02:53 PM
1

http://suicidepreventionlifeline.org
/r/MensRights21/11/16 12:35 AM
1

It's not your fault.
/r/MensRights21/11/16 12:08 AM
1

It's not your fault.
/r/MensRights21/11/16 12:01 AM
1

http://suicidepreventionlifeline.org
/r/MensRights20/11/16 11:47 PM
1

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! Gimme warning man, don't kill me! You're a special kind of horrible person aren't you?
/r/MensRights20/11/16 11:23 PM
1

Man like come on. This is way too easy. Yo.u commented to tell us to stop whining when NO ONE IS, and all you're fucking doing is now whining like a little baby back bitch! What a choatic mindfuck your brain must be right now, trying to think about all the complexities of sex and gender when your whole life consists of a mythical male persona fueled by a life of bruce springstein, baseball and a father who regrets having you.
/r/MensRights20/11/16 09:03 PM
1

Claims to be a feminist ally. Only notion of masculinity is the most exaggerated, toxic, ridiculous possible form. Yeah I bet the fems love you buddy, I bet they shower you with female ejaculations while high fiving you on being the most woke motherfucker at the orgy. Get over yourself bud, maybe it's time to go have a good cry in the shower, I think its been too long.
/r/MensRights20/11/16 08:50 PM
1

Aren't you special!
/r/MensRights20/11/16 08:44 PM
123

If this is inane, then the women's day doodle is innapropriate. Yes, that is how it works.
/r/MensRights19/11/16 05:40 PM
14

That god damn patriarchy, everytime!
/r/MensRights18/11/16 01:17 PM
2

Good read!
/r/MensRights18/11/16 02:40 AM
2

Why did you even waste the grace of a human glimpse on a fucking metro?
/r/MensRights18/11/16 02:31 AM
9

I don't know what to call Karen; a philosopher, a polemic, a critic? Whatever she is she is brilliant.
/r/MensRights28/10/16 06:34 PM
3

'#mansplainersmustdie" Jesus Christ!! That escalated quickly
/r/MensRights09/10/16 10:46 PM
0

Regarding the title of the post, I disagree. That law isn't justified by not wanting drunk people to have sex, it's justified by drunk people not being able to give consent to sex. The bullshit part is when a drunk man and drunk woman have sex it's automatically the man's fault if she declares being sexually assaulted. Why is it that the man can give his consent while drunk, but the woman cannot, and, to which standard should both sexes be held?
/r/MensRights06/10/16 03:25 AM
4

http://i.imgur.com/oFulobW.gif
/r/MensRights04/10/16 06:37 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter