TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

the_monkey_knows Archive

View 1 posts and 92 comments by the_monkey_knows on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

The trick is to be fit enough for clothes to look well, that’s it. Not too muscular, not too skinny
/r/seduction20/03/26 02:28 PM
1

I mean, if you ask someone out on a date… also, you don’t put in the effort and have her reciprocate. You just are fun dude that likes to hang out with people. You’re already framing yourself as jumping through her hoops. She doesn’t like that.
/r/seduction09/02/26 07:25 PM
1

That means that she thinks you‘re only interested in her appearance. Although that may be true, you’re a dime a dozen, most guy that meet her probably ask her out. You shouldn’t flirt with someone that isn’t attracted to you, before you even mention dating, you ask people out to hang out or in activities that are not dates, give her reasons to want to date you, otherwise you’re just like every other guy who thinks with their dicks that is only asking her out to get in her pants. Unless you reall…
/r/seduction09/02/26 06:41 PM
3

“Be your best self” is the best advice you can give someone. A person must still work on their self-development, which assumes refining yourself, not faking your authenticity. People confuse this a lot.
/r/seduction31/01/26 03:56 PM
1

Neil later wrote “Rules of the game” to focus more on methods rather than story. I’d suggest that read instead if one is just looking for the technicality and not the wisdom aspect of it
/r/seduction31/01/26 03:54 PM
1

What a stupid comment
/r/seduction15/10/25 01:50 PM
7

Calling it out explicitly like I imagine the dude is doing kills the vibe “hey, you want to go out on a date?”. What he should do is invite her over to things he’s already doing anyway, either alone or with friends. It’s like dancing and having your partner callout the next move, some people would appreciate it, but some would find it kills the dance. Also, he should escalate, that must happen, but only when the other person shows attraction. One mistake lots of people make is flirting or escala…
/r/seduction29/09/25 04:55 PM
-3

I don’t it’s biologically passed on my dude, I guess it’s kind of like being gay
/r/seduction28/09/25 04:42 AM
19

Be genuinely interested and passionate about it something, then start sharing those activities with others. People, men or women, will com to you if they notice you both share the same passion for something
/r/seduction26/09/25 03:36 PM
3

That’s exactly what you’re saying, don’t play dumb now
/r/seduction30/08/25 02:19 AM
6

So you’re saying that it’s impossible for you to imagine scenarios where a woman can misinterpret a guy or mention a boyfriend when she isn’t being hit on? Cause, apparently you’ve never seen that happen in real life, and that’s telling, and I don’t really feel like giving you examples. Don’t pretend to be something you’re not, it’s ok to say that you don’t have experience, that’s what this community is about
/r/seduction30/08/25 02:17 AM
5

I don’t know how much you interact in the real world, but a woman can tell you she has a boyfriend even if you just met for a group run and you aren’t even hitting on anyone. Which is why that statement is accurate because is more comprehensive than your apparent limited understanding that all interactions are cold approaches
/r/seduction30/08/25 02:11 AM
0

I don’t get the laugh. It’s true, whether she really had a boyfriend or not, the fact that she had to mention it means that you showed too much interest in her
/r/seduction30/08/25 01:13 AM
1

I never stopped being a nice guy, I think you’re confusing being nice with being weak
/r/seduction11/08/25 02:55 AM
3

OP’s question didn’t specify what kind of attractiveness
/r/seduction24/05/25 03:32 AM
1

I see. I’m not talking about your closest personal circle, but other social circles. For example, I had a group of friends with whom I met through a band I used to play in, we would gather on Fridays to drink and sit by a canal of the house of one of my buddies. I had another group that would go salsa dancing on wednesdays. Another that would go rock climbing on Thursdays. I had some groups of friends from college that would just invite you to house parties. I even had some friends from work tha…
/r/seduction14/05/25 12:41 PM
1

That’s a first. Why?
/r/seduction14/05/25 12:24 PM
1

I know, the person I replied to basically said, screw that, just keep on playing the numbers game. But I kind of went through what OP is saying. I worked in my inner game, then focused primarily on building relationships, which is like its own sort of game, and then things became easier. Like, I wouldn’t have to invite a woman to go out on a date, I would just be like, we’re having a gathering this Friday, you can come (implying that whether she comes or not, I’m having a good time). It was like…
/r/seduction14/05/25 12:14 PM
1

Yeah, I’m with you there, but how do you get a social circle in the first place if not through knowing how to build relationships, not just romantic. And from my experience, this works better when you have different social circles.
/r/seduction14/05/25 11:57 AM
0

That's why an indicator of interest makes more sense. It's a sign that there is potential interest. If I extend my palms and she places hers in mine is an indicator, for example, or if I drop silent and she picks up the conversation, or if I take a step back and she takes a step forward. Those aren't just absence of "red flags" those are deliberate acts that indicate potential interest. Rule of thumb was that you escalate with each 3 you get. If a woman is just sitting there and keeps on the con…
/r/seduction12/05/25 11:43 PM
0

You escalate to look for green lights not red lights. You move closer, and if she stays put that's a green light. In other words, the presence of a green light or what we used to call an indicator of interest is an invitation. The absence of red lights is neutral, it doesn't necessarily mean interest.
/r/seduction12/05/25 11:01 PM
-5

Bad idea
/r/seduction12/05/25 10:09 PM
1

Skills in starting a conversation, yeah, but what OP is proposing is going further than that. What’s the point of knowing how to approach people if you have no idea how to build strong relationships with others, that also takes practice.
/r/seduction11/05/25 04:14 AM
1

There also are very few women that have "rizz". The thing is that there's a lot of desperate guys out there that would make some women believe they do when they actually don't.
/r/seduction05/04/25 05:56 PM
0

This was my experience in miami. Met some of the most interesting and eccentric women there, the moment they realize you have depth you’ll stand out by a lot
/r/seduction02/02/25 08:22 PM
2

Don’t really know about the guy, but based off this video alone my take is that it’s fake. But even if it was real, this would be what we used to call fool’s mate. Dude didn’t do anything special, convo was as generic as I’ve seen. And he looks decent. Sometimes, if you open plenty there would be some people with whom you wouldn’t need to do much to get attraction, sometimes just opening the conversation is all you have to do. So, sure, you got what you wanted, but did you get it despite your ap…
/r/seduction19/01/25 11:47 PM
4

If you think that one must think every single move like a chess master, you’re way off, it’s not like that. That would be exhausting. If you had bothered trying to understand what I described in my first comment you would understand the principles rather than specific scripts, for which I didn’t give you any purposefully. Scripts or “techniques” make you be in your head, principles allow you do enjoy yourself more once you understand them, you just know it when you see it. For example, you know …
/r/seduction16/01/25 06:23 AM
2

People who are not afraid of embracing complexity will always take you out for a ride.
/r/seduction16/01/25 06:09 AM
6

If what I just described to you is too complicated then you're in for a rude awakening. The world is much more complicated than that. It may sound tough to say, but you better get used to it. Otherwise, you'll be easy prey of those who do, since they'll have an upper hand over you on so many other areas not just this. Do as most people do then, keep throwing stuff at the wall and see what sticks so that you can "get lucky" sometime. Which is honestly how some people intuitively learn how to be g…
/r/seduction16/01/25 05:38 AM
16

Flirting isn’t effective if the other person isn’t attracted to you. A random stranger isn’t attractive to most women (you’re one out of many, even threatening to some), but if the same stranger casually displays a captivating and enjoyable personality then the stranger has a higher chance of becoming attractive to a woman’s eye (you’re no longer one out of many). Only then the seduction should begin. Most amateurs flirt when there’s no attraction and that’s where they fail right off the bat. Th…
/r/seduction16/01/25 04:34 AM
1

I don't get this sub, what this guy is saying is nothing new. It's actually pretty old. And the whole thing about using canned stuff from old school is missing entirely the point of what it actually was.
/r/seduction18/12/24 07:12 PM
-4

It already exists, read The Game
/r/seduction13/12/24 02:02 AM
2

It’s never happened to you? I think at least starting from the millennial generation forward it’s not uncommon at all.
/r/Divorce_Men12/08/24 02:35 PM
3

I wouldn’t be advising this if OP was still on the marriage or somewhat attached to the outcome. It’s not his responsibility to seek it out, but when the opportunity is so right there, cheap, easy, and detachment from outcome is there, I would say it’d be a great way of doing a favor to someone else. It’s moral hazard, that dude is gonna keep doing it because he knows all the people affected are just “going to move on.” Somewhere I bet there’s someone wishing someone like OP would take an opport…
/r/Divorce_Men09/07/24 03:20 PM
3

He doesn’t have to say it. He said that “karma” would take care of that person, but when “karma” gives him such a low hanging fruit it may be acting through him. If it doesn’t cost him anything and he’s detached from the outcome, why not? Actions have consequences.
/r/Divorce_Men09/07/24 02:43 PM
7

What does one get from someone who committed a crime that prejudiced them going to jail? Putting aside the possibility that they may be a danger to society, the answer is right there
/r/Divorce_Men09/07/24 01:15 PM
1

Yeah, but imagine if you had both
/r/seduction25/03/24 04:14 PM
45

You have to always give the impression that you are one who would walk away.
/r/seduction06/03/24 01:45 PM
2

Classes. Learning is a good way of meeting new people in general.
/r/seduction16/10/22 05:51 PM
1

Not at all. If anything it’s expected. I used to be out partying and meeting new people, now I just code and build algorithms alone at night and I love it. Of course, I’m married now, but like Neil Strauss said it in his own book, chasing hookups is like “trying to fill up a bucket with a hole in it.”
/r/seduction06/09/22 09:35 PM
1

I’m not sure how the conversation went but just because the conversation goes normal/funny doesn’t mean anything. On first meeting I used to not flirt at all, but mainly impress them with something, either a future event that I would invite them to, my knowledge of a particular subject that they may find useful (for their classes), or some of my hobbies. I would go with the context of “I’m the shet, people want to be with me, I’m doing you a favor by talking to you in the first place.” I would o…
/r/seduction20/03/22 02:52 PM
-1

Nah, this is bad advice. Once you get there, you'll realize that it's better off for you to not keep anyone at bay, knowing with full confidence that you could be with anyone if you wanted to.
/r/seduction17/03/22 01:57 AM
1

Don't chase, attract. Aim to become the person with the same values, activities, and character that you want to in the person of the opposite sex. It takes time, but it seems that you are actively looking for solutions, which will pay off in the long run as you get a handle of all this.
/r/seduction08/03/22 03:35 AM
0

You literally wrote relationships there
/r/seduction25/02/22 05:07 PM
-3

And what do you think is the purpose of a relationship. Edit: OC is the idiot here. He never wondered why he wants to fuck in the first place, why he gets that urge to begin with, why a fuck even exists. Once he does, he’ll realize why he started to get downvoted initially before whatever brigade came to “save” his ass.
/r/seduction25/02/22 04:21 PM
-1

Don’t waste her time
/r/seduction11/01/22 03:34 PM
1

From the looks of it it seems like she thinks that she has the upper hand in this interaction. Give her a yes and a no, tell that she you do when she's nice or something.
/r/seduction06/01/22 02:06 PM
2

More specifically to what OP is asking for would be “Rules of The Game” by same Neil Strauss
/r/seduction04/01/22 10:19 PM
8

Very well said, something was off to me as well by reading “landing the best woman” as if it was some sort of achievement to be unlocked. OP needs to start attracting rather than chasing.
/r/seduction04/01/22 10:13 PM
1

You don’t hit on someone until after she’s intrigued/interested/attracted to you. Asking for a phone number within 5 minutes of probably generic small talk will be a huge turn off for most people.
/r/seduction03/01/22 05:07 PM
5

Read “The Game” by Neil Strauss. Take it with a pinch of salt though with the whole gamified mentality, however, the book is really good at describing how to approach groups cause according to the book women of beauty are rarely alone. That’s how I met my wife, by approaching the group
/r/seduction13/12/21 12:38 AM
17

Your friend is confusing being a dick with being assertive. Obviously being rude, harsh, or a dick is undesirable but you can extract the part of it that is desirable, which is the confidence, assertiveness, and strength you find in people who act like dicks. Women don’t like assholes, they like men who are strong (not necessarily physically), witty, confident, assertive, who own their space and tread with conviction. It just so happens that they find many of these qualities in men who have issu…
/r/seduction08/12/21 12:00 PM
1

I don’t really think there’s any pressure. But personally, I got bored of it mid twenties, switched my interests to other things. So, maybe you think there’s some sort of pressure cause you don’t see that many men in their thirties hooking up as you used to in your twenties.
/r/seduction06/12/21 08:55 PM
1

I’ve met some of the ugliest, shortest, and not so fit dudes date gorgeous women. However, they were some of the most charismatic, entertaining, well dressed, and confident people I’ve ever met (not necessarily rich). It’s not about the physical look.
/r/seduction06/12/21 06:37 PM
1

This is bad advice. Cringe
/r/seduction05/12/21 10:51 PM
5

Focus on yourself, don’t chase, attract
/r/seduction16/11/21 02:08 AM
2

Find an excuse to touch her, read her palm, a playful massage, a game with your hands, or a dance. Look into some old kino routines
/r/seduction09/03/20 03:18 PM
2

We could give the person who made that comment the benefit of the doubt, which I did at first. But then it kept getting harder to do that when further down that thread the redditor who made that comment said something like “so what if I prefer one race over another.” Now, we could give him again the benefit doubt, there is nothing wrong with having a “preference,” but at that point, after so many “almost” comments, I realized what was going on. There were just too many comments requiring me to j…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/05/19 12:22 PM
5

And you’re a mod... calling somebody else an idiot because you failed to understand my statement. I’m not taking about physical differences, obviously races are physically different otherwise we wouldn’t even be able to identify them. I’m talking about the character of a person, otherwise my statement wouldn’t make any sense, how can I imply that people would look physically different based on their culture, background, or upbringing? That would be stupid, yet that was your understanding. I also…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/05/19 11:47 PM
4

The belief that one race is inherently superior to another. Like I said, the post itself doesn’t seem racist but it seems that it’s attracting an audience that are implicitly being racist in their rhetoric. That’s a bit disturbing, because I may concede that there will be differences in people based on culture, background, upbringing, but not race. If I were a racist, I wouldn’t go full blast on Reddit saying explicitly that I believe some races are superior to others; no, I would be subtle abou…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/05/19 06:01 PM
3

The post itself isn't racist, what worries me are the replies and the amount of upvotes they receive. Like the first one I saw here about the guy saying that she's bastardizing her "heritage," then later explicitly say that he prefers some races over others. This sub is fun and all, but after seeing comments like that, makes me wonder whether the "fun" of this sub is being used by others as a cover up for some f'ed up sh't I don't want to be part of.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/05/19 08:52 AM
11

And the last thing those 2 men would want would be to give her the time.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/04/19 05:34 PM
23

I didn't make it to a quarter of what she wrote, and there are so many contradictions. One that comes to mind is saying that she's a pansexual (apparently someone who likes all genders), and then says that she doesn't like bisexual men, gay, or trans. This woman has way more issues than entitlement. I think OP actually found a psycho. Edit: typo
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/04/19 05:33 PM
1

You're mistaking being kind with being weak, being generous with being naive, and love with irrationality. From my own personal experience, being kind, generous, and affectionate has given me great success in private life as long as it's combined with confidence, assertion, intelligence, and wisdom. If anything, being that way will weed out the bad ones, cause they will quickly crash with your confidence and self-esteem. ​ In a way you are right that kindness, generosity, love, and benevolence a…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/03/19 04:35 PM
3

One from Jamal, two from Tyrone
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/03/19 08:18 PM
5

A classic
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/02/19 04:54 AM
3

Same thing with me bro. Stepdad fell in love with my mom and he helped me go to contests where I eventually won a scholarship for a private school. Now, I’m doing financially well, and I have a lot of gratitude for that man who believed in a mom and his kid. But I understand that we are exceptions, however, I believe that whenever a generalization is made, a disclaimer needs to accompany it, which OP didn’t do. Explicit is better than implicit in these times of misunderstanding.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/02/19 06:20 PM
2

I'm seriously curious how did that even happen?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/01/19 02:01 AM
6

I think for this particular case, it'd have to be a 4chan-level neckbeard desperate
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/12/18 06:23 PM
1

lmao!
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/12/18 11:57 PM
11

Sorry if I didn't explain myself. You're talking about 'entitlement.' There's a difference in the way I see it. What you deserve it's up to your own criteria, you look at yourself, you look at what you think you're worth, and you got out there and try to get what you believe you deserve, life won't give you what you want unless you go out there and take it. Everyone's definition of what they deserve it's up to them, but it's gotta be justified. I agree with what you say that some people think th…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/12/18 06:04 PM
12

OP shouldn't think about this too much, all those who plead him to "save" this relationship don't realize that there is nothing of value here to be saved. OP should let her go.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/12/18 04:55 PM
18

The misogynistic patriarchy was wrong about only virgins being wife material, that was an extreme and extremes are not good. The issue was not that OP's fiancé had been with previous partners, but that she had decided to "settle down" with the boring one while reserving all the fun and excitement for her ex, and still thinking about it. That means that she thinks less of OP. OP should break up and find with someone else that he believes he deserves; not a woman like her who only wants him becaus…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/12/18 04:39 PM
2

We agree on the topic of authority, even though it didn't seem to me that way from your earlier comment that implied that prisons were "rape-proof" through vagina inspections. I must have misunderstood it then, because I'm with you on that last paragraph. With respect to the other topic, I'd prefer to avoid generalizations. This is the way I see it, men and women are different, no one is better nor worse than the other, just different. I'm not onboard with forcing "equality," but I agree with ha…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/12/18 03:00 AM
25

We all have "goodness" and "evil" within ourselves. It’s empathy and self-awareness that keeps us from acting on our "evil" impulses. By having people of one other gender guard a prison of the other, you add a layer of temptation for corruption for those who lack the strength to keep their integrity, regardless of gender. Not sure how much you trust the system we live in, with all its politics, self-interest, and greed, but I wouldn’t trust a prison any more than that.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/12/18 11:29 PM
8

It’s the money
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/12/18 10:41 PM
24

I’m not so sure about having an all-male guard staff in a female prison.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/12/18 10:29 PM
6

Nah, most likely some idiot who will fall for their sad story of "manipulation."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/12/18 10:28 PM
5

That is a great analogy
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/12/18 04:05 AM
13

Yeah, some things are basic such as money, power, and being adventurous, but there are some that do change like a beard, tattoos, or a freakin manbun
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/11/18 03:40 AM
2

Yes, her conclusion is so weak it makes me think she knew it all along but didn’t take it seriously herself. She just wanted to brag about sleeping around, possibly cause she saw somebody else do it in a movie or IG, and she thought it was cool. In her line in reference to her ideal partner: I’d crawl across broken glass for that shithead If a man had said something like that, there would be a lot of controversy for his statement, but somehow is ok coming from her. She is using the insult to dis…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/11/18 05:03 PM
53

Reminds me of this poem from poem_for_your_sprog ‘She spoke her slogan, well-rehearsed, And oftentimes expressed: 'If you can't take me at my worst, You don't deserve my best! So there!' she grinned, content with glee, And pompous, proud delight Emboldened by banality, And self-important trite. 'All-right,' I said - 'I'm gone, and glad.' She turned with dark dismay. 'You see - your worst is really bad. Your best is just okay.'
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/11/18 07:02 AM
5

Weird, I’m not seeing anything on mobile, I’ll check it on my laptop later. Thanks for clarifying.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/11/18 07:08 PM
3

Where did you find the original post?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/11/18 07:03 PM
2

That has a name, it’s called the confounding effect
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/11/18 07:00 PM
4

Oh, for sure. We rarely get the perspective of the other person in these kind of stories, which usually signals at the lack of empathy of the narrator.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/11/18 09:17 PM
1

Yeah, some comments I've seen somehow give off that hateful vibe. But in fairness, I've seen few that were more tactful in their wording. At first, I was like "that bio doesn't seem that bad," but then I realized that she is insulting people for wanting to have a choice. Just because a man acknowledges that he doesn't want to carry the responsibility of raising three kids, doesn't make them "weak." People have choices, there will be some men who will choose to share that responsibility, but insu…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/11/18 07:30 PM
0

would you kill too? Would you steal? No, right? Yeah, but there are people who do, just because you don't doesn't mean nobody will.
/r/MGTOW01/10/18 07:53 PM
-1

bullshit, take your garbage somewhere else. With politically charged posts like this, you are being as obnoxious and false as the people you criticize
/r/MGTOW01/10/18 07:49 PM
11

this how the wereareallthegoodmen types come to be, because the attention they get are from desperate guys who just want to fck, because they themselves take the easy route, they get taken for easy, and then they give us material for this sub. It's a vicious circle.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/09/18 09:09 PM
4

This is the most idiotic thing I've read this year. And I read a lot. Only reason I kept reading was because of some curious fascination as to how limited her perspective of reality can be.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/09/18 06:50 PM
11

OP can pretend that he “got hacked”
/r/MGTOW03/04/18 11:20 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter