TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

thebodymullet Archive

View 0 posts and 86 comments by thebodymullet on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
21

Fuck no. Tell them you identify as a gender and this is a gender-non-specific bathroom. Get it in writing that you're not allowed to use a restroom that specifically open to all genders and then sue the pants off them.
/r/MensRights06/11/22 04:10 PM
2

Men! We know how to be friends! YouTube link, Family Guy.
/r/MensRights15/09/22 01:00 AM
2

u/Occma is using "nothing" in context of the statement that children provide passive income. They do not, unless you're pimping them out, which is rather horrific and also probably not that passive. However, they do not passively accrue income for the parent/s except in extreme cases (extreme poverty and tax breaks, neglectful parents, etc). u/Occma could have stated more clearly this financial component of their statement, but the context was clear. Sincerely, a dad who loves his child very muc…
/r/MensRights29/08/22 05:01 PM
2

Are you suggesting that you'll vote republican in the next election? This party is actively trying to subvert hundreds of years of precedent and progress. Cutting off your nose to spite your face seems... illogical. Are you suggesting that you'll vote a mixture of independent and republican? Or straight independent? As good as it can feel to stick it to the powers that be and truly vote your mind and conscience, the fact remains that in this broken, two-party system, votes outside the party line…
/r/MensRights06/07/22 02:42 AM
2

It breaks things a bit, though. Childcare becomes more difficult in modern gender roles with less delineation between them. You still need a parent at home to care for young children, but you have one income carrying the weight where before there were two AND there's a new mouth to feed AND companies have adapted pay structures to the changing reality of a two-income family so the breadwinner is no longer winning as much bread for his or her family as he or she used to, 50-70 years ago. I, too. …
/r/MensRights18/03/22 11:49 PM
2

Don't do it unless you medically require the procedure.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 07:41 PM
-2

You better watach yourself.
/r/MensRights02/10/21 01:22 AM
-5

watachabke If you see signs of a stroke, act F.A.S.T. Face - lopsided smile or facial droop on one side Arms - ask the person to hold their arms out at shoulder height; check if one side is lower than the other. Speech - if speech is slurred or muddy. Time - it's time to call emergency services. Every minute counts!
/r/MensRights01/10/21 11:03 PM
3

Cannon for president!
/r/MensRights10/02/21 07:57 AM
9

"Your argument smells fishy to me...wait, that's something else." I know we shouldn't stoop to their level, but, damn, that would have been a good retort.
/r/MensRights29/01/21 04:00 AM
1

"Your argument smells fishy to me...wait, that's something else." I know we shouldn't stoop to their level, but, damn, that would have been a good retort.
/r/MensRights29/01/21 03:58 AM
4

Or, too quiet.
/r/MensRights05/08/20 07:45 PM
6

How do you propose to circumvent hundreds of thousands of years of hardwired biological imperative in a few short generations? Seriously, the big picture here is that for LITERALLY THE ENTIRETY OF HUMAN HISTORY/PRE-HISTORY, things have been such that women required protection because to lose the women of the tribe means to lose the tribe. So, in the last 20000 years, things have changed dramatically; we farm instead of hunt/gather/subsist, and as a result we can build cities and what we understa…
/r/MensRights28/07/20 11:40 PM
23

They're not getting the help they need to just say "No" to perpetrating violence.
/r/MensRights04/05/20 08:29 PM
-1

Agreed, non-sarcastically. If I'm hired on at base rate x for a job, I want a woman to be hired on at the same base rate x. If I merit an increase to x times 10% due to performance, and she only merits x times 5%, she's earned her lesser pay. However, if I hire on at x, and she hires on at x times 97% for the same job, that's not fair. Let her earn the higher, lower, is same wage as me. Don't default to a lower amount because she might take more sick days than I might.
/r/MensRights26/02/20 10:07 PM
0

Let's not conflate herpes and feminists. The two really aren't related in a meaningful way, and name-calling is at best ineffective in demonstrating our intentions and will actually likely serve to give others more excuse to denigrate our group and our goal.
/r/MensRights18/01/20 02:38 AM
2

I used to attract all the ladies with my foreskin, but lost it in a traumatic shaving accident. Now I have no ladies AND no foreskin.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 12:14 AM
2

We should attach her to a treadmill to see if this hypothesis proves true.
/r/MensRights13/11/19 10:49 PM
13

We even got curiosity to Mars!
/r/MensRights26/07/19 11:58 PM
1

You're* Really, all you are showing Fixed (part of) that for you.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 09:45 PM
1

The answer is clear: we need more teenage male babysitters!
/r/MensRights28/06/19 07:01 PM
6

The pleasure of her company? The eye candy? Who knows how it's justified in one's mind?
/r/MensRights31/01/19 05:01 PM
9

It means you're free to silently (or not) judge the user of such terminology.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 06:59 PM
8

Wider parking spaces to tackle poorer driving skills/spatial awareness issues. /s
/r/MensRights03/12/18 08:21 PM
5

It was an undertaking that all of humankind could appreciate.
/r/MensRights21/11/18 12:06 AM
37

This is less a mic drop and more throwing a mic off a cage and plummeting 16 feet through an announcer's table.
/r/MensRights20/11/18 11:24 PM
-19

Might be better than what the USA has got right now... We're currently governed by asses (not the blue kind)
/r/MensRights13/11/18 05:44 PM
1

I honestly don't know what evidence exists that might exonerate Kavanaugh vs validate Ford. We know that the FBI was granted a limited license to speak with some people. We know that more people approached FBI field offices and were left languishing. We don't know if any of these would-be informants were motivated for political reasons, or their own 5 minutes of fame, or whatever else. We know that Ford has behaved poorly in her part of the investigation, and have reason to suspect her motivatio…
/r/MensRights05/10/18 12:43 AM
1

Absolutely, I agree. This is a mess all the way down. Both parties are treating the other side as an enemy, and are engaging in reprehensible behavior. Neither should find themselves in any position of significant authority, as they both have allowed emotion to cloud reason and better judgment.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 12:29 AM
0

I would rather that ten guilty go free than one innocent suffer unjustly. I would also rather that any position of great power and influence be subject to thorough, intense review, rather than left open to the highest bidder.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 09:53 PM
1

You assume too much about me. If he had maintained his composure, and responded to false allegations with information supporting his POV, I would stand on his side despite the fact that I disagree with his political leanings. Had he been able to explain calmly that her allegations are unprovable while still providing no proof of his own, and do so in a fashion befitting a candidate of such a high seat, I would still support the process by which his nomination was reviewed. But screaming, crying,…
/r/MensRights04/10/18 09:50 PM
2

I can babble nonsense, too, but I choose to engage in conversation rather than attempt to shame someone. The beauty of Reddit is that it allows people from all walks of life to come together and communicate. The beauty of your so eloquently-stated response shows me that further conversation with you is unnecessary. I need not bash my head against the wall you've erected around your own.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 09:35 PM
0

If you had read my reply, you would understand my point of view (as well as anyone can through this medium.) One is not a rapist in truth or in accusation solely based on the fact that they drink. One is accused a rapist based on a) verifiable evidence that a sexual assault occurred and the accused party can be proven culpable, or b) a baseless accusation brought forth by a party with malicious intent to sully the name of the accused. Whether Kavanaugh stands guilty, I don't know. Barring a much…
/r/MensRights04/10/18 06:09 PM
16

I don't want to get off this planet. Fuck that. I want them to get off this planet and go molest each other on Io or Mars or something. Why should the good be punished for the crimes if the wicked?
/r/MensRights04/10/18 05:46 PM
7

I hear you have to be accused of sexually assaulting or raping a person to be considered a rapist. Anecdotal case-in-point. I have a few brewskis from time to time; in fact, I had a few just last night. Nobody has called me a rapist yet. It helps that I keep dick in my pants and my hands to myself unless they're explicitly requested elsewhere.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 05:43 PM
9

It's almost like men and women on both sides of the unfortunate political divide support equal rights and responsibilities for both sexes. Most r/mensrights subscribers, and MRAs in the wild, are trying to stop the pendulum from swinging the other way. We recognize that kinetic energy will just drag it back and forth as one side or the other gets more power. We seek balance, not power.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 10:56 PM
0

camera pans around the room
/r/MensRights28/09/18 05:28 PM
12

If you blow hard enough, the positive pressure might be enough to pop your head out of your ass.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 05:50 AM
9

One of these is not like the other.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 05:22 AM
3

The rapists are raping other rapists!
/r/MensRights30/08/18 06:09 PM
2

It's because you're providing an argument contrary to the accepted narrative, and most folk aren't willing(/able?) to accept that their interpretation of something might be incomplete or incorrect. You threaten the comfort zone they've created or found for themselves.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 07:17 AM
4

Keep up the good work, good sir/madam/assault Apache helicopter. Source-bomb the shit outta this.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 05:52 PM
9

Would you like a Snickers bar? You seem a bit hangry.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 05:41 PM
1

And if he had of reacted
/r/MensRights13/08/18 06:56 PM
125

Thank you.
/r/MensRights12/04/18 06:27 PM
1

Productivity has continued to rise in the US since the 70s; it's wage growth that plateaued in the 70s. I'm not providing hard numbers, nor am I vetting the images I found, but Google image search "American productivity graph" for numerous sourced references to productivity growth vs wage growth over the last 50 years.
/r/MensRights26/03/18 07:39 PM
56

The article "addresses" that point in a very preachy, how-dare-you-be-offended fashion. Last couple paragraphs...
/r/MensRights12/01/18 04:29 AM
4

Fair point. Everybody needs a vent. However, in a text-only forum, its even easier to take your statement out of context. Posts like that end up pasted into Huffpo's justification for why men are whiny/violent/man-children/etc. You can't change anything by showing the opposition exactly what they want to see.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 08:06 PM
6

With that I cannot disagree. However, his statement is inflammatory and invites contention at best, not dialogue. It won't do a thing but help to dig the trench a bit deeper.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 08:02 PM
7

Yeah, you're not helping anything.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 07:34 PM
2

You should sit down with her and have an honest conversation. You need to tell her these things, face to face. And if she won't listen, or if she treats you as anything less than equal, or if she ignores what you have to say, you need to decide if you'd rather continue feeling like her doormat or if you'd rather get out and move on. This is /r/mensrights. We treat ourselves, our lovers, and the rest of those we meet with respect, as equals, until it is demonstrated their failure to act as an equ…
/r/MensRights12/10/17 07:12 PM
10

10-14 year old males, at that.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 06:33 PM
2

I do what I can. It's an easy mistake. As I like to say, dew knot trussed yore spell chequer two fined awl you're mistakes.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 02:36 AM
23

Stationery = paper (specifically for writing) Stationary = not moving
/r/MensRights17/05/17 03:22 PM
8

Here you go.
/r/MensRights29/09/16 11:46 PM
2

You won't believe #8! Seriously, this is just clickbait. OP should post something with substance, something to advance the conversation and not some shitty rehash of what we already know done up in a crappy format.
/r/MensRights22/04/16 09:28 PM
3

You raise a good point, but we're not talking about the draft in this particular thread. It's about gender integration in combat roles. I think everyone here thinks the draft should be repealed or, if not, modernized to include both genders. Furthermore, if it's modernized to include women as draftable, there are always roles to fill in war that don't involve combat. Should war arise that requires the draft, I certainly don't want women in combat situations for precisely the same reasons that Se…
/r/MensRights12/01/16 02:03 AM
1

I know I'm not welcome here I'll be gone in a minute I promise Please don't mistake us for close-minded bigots unable to handle criticism or an opposing viewpoint. The majority of us are here because we support women's rights AND men's rights and we see the need for a voice on this side of the picture. If you come to us willing to have an honest give-and-take discussion about our separate viewpoints, we welcome you with open arms. We do not seek to exclude any but those who exclude others outrig…
/r/MensRights07/01/16 10:27 PM
3

Interestingly enough, only about 25% of candidates who run for public office are female, according to this Pew Research Article. There is a documented imbalance in female representation in government; 10% of governors are female, and 18% of House members are, as well. However, 20% and 24% of Senators and state legislators are female, respectively. So, in some areas of government, women are vastly underrepresented, but so are blacks, Hispanics, people under 65, and people who don't donate to poli…
/r/MensRights25/12/15 10:56 AM
18

I agree with you on many counts, and I don't intend to poke holes in your argument, but the article titled "Men: Guilty until proven innocent" is an MRA positive article about how it is not worth the risk of marginalizing risk by marginalizing men and how we, as men and women together, need to push against this. It's a prime example of what our society needs, written back in 2007 by Anne Hart.
/r/MensRights20/12/15 08:47 PM
0

You cannot revoke consent for an act you consciously committed to completion. You can revoke consent in the middle of the act. Let me phrase it you in car repair terms with regard you your selected repair provider. You can choose the repair of shop of your choice for your vehicle repairs. You can change the repair facility of choice up until repairs are completed. After repairs are completed, you cannot change the repair shop you choose because you cannot effectively unrepair your car. You canno…
/r/MensRights10/12/15 10:09 AM
0

I understand that you disagree with that person's message. I do, too. It does you no good to shoot the messenger, though. It does serve to make you look bad. People have a hard time as it is taking MRM seriously. They claim we're man-children. Engaging in name-calling in a public forum only serves to further that image. Are you going to prove them wrong, or right?
/r/MensRights06/12/15 03:02 AM
2

One should contribute meaningfully to a conversation or not at all.
/r/MensRights06/12/15 02:22 AM
3

Of doesn't mean what you think it means. You should have used "have" with that kind of statement. Should have, could have, will have, may have, etc.
/r/MensRights28/07/15 02:29 AM
9

Solder worship? Like venerating hot metals?
/r/MensRights13/04/15 06:47 AM
2

And this kind of mentality bothers me so much. TBH I don't care about men's rights, or women's rights. I care about human rights. Black, white, gay, straight, male, female, pantheist, atheist, who cares. Everybody deserves to be treated with respect. You don't see homosexual individuals clamoring for heterosexuals to be on the receiving end of discrimination; you don't see blacks claiming it's the white man's turn to suffer. Why does a significant vocal element of modern feminism claim that men …
/r/MensRights11/04/15 06:50 PM
1

The wikipedia article explains well the concept without really touching on some of the more toxic elements of the movement at large.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 06:45 PM
7

The goal of modern third-wave feminism is not about getting equal anymore; it's about getting even.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 04:57 PM
2

Jumping on the bandwagon here. It absolutely is worth it. We all have to fight this together, or else we all lose individually.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 09:00 AM
1

All good things must end, someday. Western society, too, shall pass.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 08:58 PM
0

Then all apologies, good sir. I do believe your usage of "based" is a regionalism to which I've not been heavily exposed. You might check out the full definition of base at merriam-webster.com to see what I'm talking about. With regard to your post, I assumed you meant biased, even when that word would work against the argument you were making (which didn't help with my confusion at all). I personally would have used "(factually) grounded", "unbiased", "accurate", "egalitarian", "progressive", o…
/r/MensRights13/02/15 04:06 AM
2

I stand corrected.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 03:38 AM
3

I think he's trying to use the word "biased".
/r/MensRights13/02/15 03:10 AM
1

It's pretty bad when a single letter can be used to refer to a person for years to come. With the exception of 'V', of course. V's the shit. W is shit.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 07:44 PM
2

To be honest, you couldn't even pay me to bare children. That's just wrong.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 10:24 PM
0

death throes. FTFY :D
/r/MensRights20/12/14 05:28 AM
9

It absolutely is worth the time, effort, and aggravation. You're already aggravated. You already want this type of behavior to stop. You're in a position to bring to the forefront the exact circumstances regarding this discrimination. If you don't do something about it, who will do it for you?
/r/MensRights12/10/14 08:51 PM
-10

Go back to /r/theredpill.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 01:11 PM
17

Don't call him a pillar of modern physics! Pillars are phallic symbols of oppression! /s
/r/MensRights01/04/14 06:07 AM
0

His SOL what? Don't leave me hanging, dude!
/r/MensRights26/03/14 10:17 PM
8

Well, it's cracked.com. They've done a good job of convincing themselves and many others they're intelligent (it's just good editors, usually), but in reality they're redundant, repetitive, and they tend to repeat themselves.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 04:08 AM
1

...What?
/r/MensRights18/02/14 05:28 AM
7

And what bothers me is that a man must fulfill his traditional gender role and a woman must not be forced into a traditional gender role. Oh, the double standards!
/r/MensRights17/02/14 06:54 PM
1

What?!? How dare you question downvotes cast against you for seeking a voice of moderation and mutual respect!!! Something something chauvinist pig. /s For what it's worth, I distributed upvotes across the board for honest questions and helpful answers, and look to see more of what Karen Straughan has to say.
/r/MensRights16/02/14 02:40 PM
3

Gynosympathy.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 04:55 AM
1

free rein FTFY "Reign" is something royalty does. "Reins" are what you put on your horse to control where he's going, and you give the horse "free rein" if you're not worried about what direction you're headed.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 03:59 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter