TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

thebrucemoose Archive

View 1 post and 39 comments by thebrucemoose on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

Not really historical facts there. It's conjecture bases upon gross misuse of reality. I'm also going to point out that civilisation has been doing pretty fine for the last hundred years. The biggest threat to civilisation as we know it hasn't been the emancipated female population, it's been the lingering wounds of empires and the battle of democracy. Emancipation has been nothing but positive. I'm shocked that you seem to advocate that women are needed to be oppressed for society to work. It's…
/r/MensRights30/09/12 10:22 PM
1

I wouldn't even use it. It'd just be nice to know that I could use it to move stuff.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 12:40 AM
3

I wholeheartedly agree. Most of my friends hold a different ideology to me. We disagree on most issues but still enjoy spending time with each other.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 09:19 PM
9

Okay, now I wish that my dick had telekinetic powers.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 09:14 PM
1

I do. It shows that people view men as rational individuals who are responsible for all their actions; whereas women are often viewed as emotional individuals who are not always responsible for their actions. At the very least their actions can often be excused due to feelings. Ideally both sexes should be treated as both emotive and rational. That is why it is an MRM issue, the male gender needs to be changed, we have to have our emotions and feelings acknowledged instead of scorned ('grow a pa…
/r/MensRights13/09/12 03:12 PM
1

There's that too, but it seems to me that his (apparently brief and insignificant affair) is being treated with a lot more significance than his devotion to his wife and family; in addition to her clear long term attachment to his best friend. It comes down to the view that men are responsible for their actions, whereas women get more of a benefit of the doubt. Hell, even OP seems to think that it's his fault that she decided to leave him remarkably quickly after the death of their child. Yet ag…
/r/MensRights13/09/12 02:58 PM
2

They are not yet divorced but she has clearly emotionally separated from him. Note that I'm not saying that OP is blameless, just that Reddit is overly prone to supporting a woman, even when she is at fault.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 02:05 PM
2

I can. It's in an alternate universe where he was thwarted at the demilitarisation of the Rhineland though.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 09:54 PM
7

When you think about it, Hitler's life was a classic underdog story, he went from nothing to leader of the Third Reich. And then he became a mass murderer ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights07/09/12 03:33 PM
10

I hate to be that guy but Hitler was Austrian.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 02:02 PM
13

One of the greatest problems in our world is that we are governed by people who care more about feelings than thoughts or ideas. If we could make everyone realise their potential as a rational individual and treated them as such then the world would be a much better place.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 05:14 PM
2

Oh of course. Good catch Erasmus.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 11:44 AM
4

It's the Ol' 'True Scotsman' trick, why make a proper, well explained and evidenced point when you can draw indistinct lines that add nothing to discussion. Whenever someone says anything like 'real man' I just ignore it; it is nothing more than hollow rhetoric.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 08:25 AM
3

There's a difference between being angry about one specific part and targeting it; and being angered by the specific part and targeting everyone remotely and tenuously connected with it.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 08:12 AM
11

I noticed that. Men like him really confuse me. They are so focused on championing women that they are fully prepared to throw themselves and all other men under a bus. It's counter intuitive to call yourself vermin, scum and (IIRC the article about men being unnecessary was written by a man) unneeded for human reproduction. I just don't understand their thought processes.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 08:04 AM
3

They want their version of equality. The difference between that and actual equality is that nobody is equal in their scenario.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 08:01 AM
4

I'm going to steal that quote, it will no doubt prove useful.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 08:30 AM
2

That's bullshit. I can't honestly say that I've been in a ghetto because they don't really exist in the north east of England but I've been in relatively poor areas my entire life; but growing up I went to a private school and came across as very privileged and wealthy. I have never felt remotely concerned being in these areas after dark, it's just an idea that people believe that there is a risk; even if there is actually no risk at all. I highly doubt that revealing clothing has any significan…
/r/MensRights04/09/12 04:25 PM
13

Definitely not. It's an absurd comparison. Firstly, there is no guarantee of violence or attack for the man walking through the ghetto. Likewise, a woman is unlikely to face violence or attack in general society; they are just conditioned to believe that it is a constant threat and that every man around them is a rapist waiting to pounce. Actually yes, I will say they are similar, violence is unlikely in both scenarios.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 03:56 PM
3

Smart money says she gets a slap on the wrist for this hate crime.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 03:42 PM
32

Because she really wanted it. Disgraceful.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 03:30 PM
5

It's hard to work out. The mods acknowledged that it was a mistake that misandry wasn't on the sidebar but refused to change it. So misandry was acknowledged as existing but was refused its proper placement on the sidebar.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 09:01 PM
3

You must have missed the great battle of /r/LGBTOpenmodmail, where groups clashed over the issue of the mods accepting that misandry should be banned in /r/LGBT along with racism, homophobia, misogyny etc.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 06:24 PM
6

Don't question, just do it.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 06:18 PM
1

Its no trouble at all. This is the comment I was referring to.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 02:45 PM
1

I was actually saying that the person you were arguing against was talking rubbish. I liked what you were saying. Kudos on the ninja edit.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 02:44 PM
3

The beginning of this clip from the Iron Lady accurately describes a lot of issues. We are governed by people who care more about feelings than de do about thoughts. Too much of politics and media has been devolved as you say, because people don't care as much as they should about real issues.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 02:42 PM
2

I'm sorry, I was reading it up until that gibberish about the wage gap. I just couldn't deal with such a long post which failed to say anything, remotely appropriate. Just let them finish off their own argument, they're doing a good job of it.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 02:34 PM
8

It's utterly ridiculous. The original post is a tale of a few mistakes made whilst drunk, all of us can relate; and reveals an insight into the mindset of those who make false-rape claims. Then stereotypical ignorant and hostile 'feminist' comes in without understanding the story and spouts some unrelated rubbish. Yet another missed opportunity for intelligent discourse.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 02:25 PM
4

Before joining this subreddit I didn't view it as an issue. I saw it as a minor aspect of a religion which doesn't really harm anyone. There is of course the issue of consent. A baby is entirely unable to make any decision, let alone a life and body altering one. I guess the best comparison would be for a parent putting those big earring things that widen the piercing hole thing; but it doesn't come close. It has long term effects and the person who suffers them did not choose them. There's also…
/r/MensRights24/08/12 11:23 AM
9

It's particularly amusing/depressing/ridiculous that they want a minor to provide for a minor. It's counter intuitive.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 10:36 AM
2

I don't know why I clicked that.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 09:34 AM
2

Actually, it seems those that have 10 children do get privileges. At least in the UK, there are plenty of women (not all of them single, most aren't) who have massive broods and live off the system. So yeah, lots of children can ensure that you don't have to work. Bloody parasites.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 09:33 AM
5

I found the girl creepy because I had a Bioshock flashback. The man looked dishevelled but that is all.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 09:24 AM
11

I disagree. Many people view me as a deeply hateful person, due to my stance on feminism and my association with the UK Conservative Party. Appearances mean nothing, especially those of someone who can control their face and voice.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 09:23 AM
2

That is the sort of arrant pedantry up with I will not put.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 09:21 AM
25

I was giving them a relatively open mind up until that point. An innocent should never be convicted.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 10:06 PM
2

My favourite part is where the author writes: He's no supporter of equal pay either. Before backing this claim up with a single piece of evidence which is tenuously linked to an equal pay issue.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 09:25 PM
2

It sounds like her Native American name.
/r/seduction24/06/12 11:58 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter