TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

thedisliked23 Archive

View 0 posts and 80 comments by thedisliked23 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Then you don't believe in the constitution, due process, the rule of law, any level of decorum for your leaders, separation of powers, human rights, equal application of fiscal responsibility, and just about any principal this country was founded on. You don't have to be a liberal to see that what is happening is bad for this country in every way. You are not a serious person.
/r/MensRights28/12/25 02:59 AM
18

You don't have to be a hippy liberal to still have a rational take on how the current crop of conservatives are hurting people and the country. It's not a one or the other situation and letting it be so leads you towards ideologies and decisions that are led by party loyalty rather than ethics and morals. Are many far left talking points anti-male? Absolutely. Are many far right policies anti-male? Absolutely. If you disagree with that you only care about the "right" kind of men, not men in gene…
/r/MensRights27/12/25 10:05 PM
0

Yeah please explain to me the mental gymnastics you and this person are using to conflate tattoos and piercings with self-harm. I'm super excited to hear it. As an aside, listening to this woman is like listening to someone with an engineering degree tell you marshmallows are the perfect material with which to construct a railway bridge. There is no data to back it up, and their entire field disagrees with them. But again, let's hear it on the self-harm, because as someone who has worked in the …
/r/MensRights27/12/25 02:30 AM
2

Yes, but you see the correlation there. Mania makes people impulsive. It's easy to make a correlation between IMPULSIVE behavior in any form to mania. Drinking, sex, impulse buying, etc., and yes, tattoos. That doesn't mean tattoos correlate BACK to having mania, any more than someone racking up credit card debt means they have mania. What I take issue with is relating behaviors to a diagnosis of a severe and persistent mental illness, which is what cluster B disorders are. Much like saying some…
/r/MensRights26/12/25 09:25 PM
2

I've worked in mental health for 25 years. The mentally ill do not have a higher prevalence of tattoos. Quite the opposite. Currently exactly zero have tattoos in the facilities I run. Zero piercings other than ears. Outside of my programs I'd say about 90% of the people I know, and easily 95% of my workforce has tattoos. There is just zero data there's a correlation between having tattoos and severe mental illness (which an ACTUAL cluster b disorder is).
/r/MensRights26/12/25 08:16 PM
-2

You are 108% correct. It is a bad idea to be in a relationship with anyone with BPD. That's just like it's a bad idea to be in a relationship with someone with schizophrenia. That doesn't mean a) we can armchair diagnose anyone who acts poorly, and b) we aren't stigmatizing mental health issues by saying anyone who engaged in a behavior has the disorder. Schizophrenics often do not believe in our reality regardless of what you show them about it. So do flat earthers. Does that mean flat earthers…
/r/MensRights26/12/25 06:14 PM
3

Cite your source. Because about 5% of people have self harmed once in their lifetime but about 32% of Americans have tattoos.
/r/MensRights26/12/25 05:57 PM
2

To the single mother point, if it's by choice I totally agree with you. In fact I have a close friend that is considering this route. Technically by choice, although she would definitely prefer doing it with a partner. That's more to do with her relationship issues than the failings of men though. And I don't disagree on the negative statistics either. I'm just pushing back on the idea that like you said, most people are the ways you described. They're surely not statistically. The better descri…
/r/MensRights08/12/25 10:47 PM
5

Not gonna step too far into this minefield other than to say not a single statement you've made here is supported by any actual data and just shows your dim view of men and relationships which again, isn't supported by facts. 70% of women your age are in relationships and 20% of mothers are single. Men and women your age earn about the same, with differences happening at later ages, and younger women out earn men in certain large cities by a very small percentage (less than 5%), with men out ear…
/r/MensRights08/12/25 06:02 PM
-8

If the family decides to pursue it, yes. I think it's just culturally less likely that the man's family would pursue it. The court system is gendered for sure, but in cases like this, under certain circumstances, gender would not matter. If a female guide service on Everest was negligent and there was sufficient evidence they were, gender would not matter. Now, they have to prove this guy was a "guide" and not just "the dude I went climbing with" and that's gonna be pretty hard in court.
/r/MensRights06/12/25 05:04 AM
3

Agreed on all counts.
/r/MensRights01/12/25 11:43 PM
3

Thanksgiving is a romantic holiday? 😅 I'm totally not saying that women don't do work in relationships. That's absolutely not my point at all and I don't want to be taken that way. And bridal showers are NOT for men. Even tangentially relating that to being romantic for men is disingenuous. It's crass in some ways but not invalid, but remember "steak and blowjob day"? If you mention that to a woman 8 out of 10 will roll their eyes and half of those will think you're a piece of shit. But I imagin…
/r/MensRights01/12/25 11:00 PM
3

Neither men nor women would consider raising children or cleaning to be romantic. Just like neither men nor women would consider providing money for a house and food romantic (if we're talking traditional gender roles, I am not). Traditionally I MEAN what society considers romantic actions. Disney does not show women chasing the prince. They show women wishing the prince would chase them. They show women dreaming about the prince. The prince is the one expected to take action. Exceptions to this…
/r/MensRights01/12/25 06:00 PM
3

You still have yet to name the traditionally "romantic" aspects of a relationship women are responsible for in general or as designated by society. Or really answer any of my questions. I'm not talking about approaching. Nothing in my posts talks about the initial phases of a relationship. I am talking about what society deems to be "romantic" and who is generally responsible for those actions. The fact that you keep saying both genders are equally responsible then have no examples of romantic a…
/r/MensRights01/12/25 05:06 PM
6

What's the romantic holiday that women are responsible for that caters to men's desires? Is it a societal norm that men are wined and dined and courted? Name all the great romantic literature, poetry, music, theater that's by women and about women chasing men? Should we keep going? Women required to have a sufficiently romantic wedding proposal to prove their love? You can disagree but be aware it's based on almost zero evidence on your part. Men are responsible for almost all aspects of romanti…
/r/MensRights01/12/25 04:22 PM
17

I just think with this board specifically (just like 2x chromo board) it's important to understand this doesn't mean women are in general bad. It just means they've been hardwired by biology and soft programmed by society to see themselves as the romantic side of the equation. And that leads to one-sided areas in relationships. It's just as bad for women as it is for men. They're sold the lie of unrealistic expectations their whole lives which leads to the idea that there's always a "better" man…
/r/MensRights30/11/25 08:34 PM
70

I've said this most of my life to various scoffing responses. There is literally no information, either data driven or antecdotal that suggests otherwise. It's like saying consumers of art are more artistic than artists themselves. Women are consumers of romance. Not producers. Of course there are always exceptions and I've dated a couple women who were very romantic but in general, women expect romance and romantic love to be done to them, not to participate in the doing. Almost every study on …
/r/MensRights30/11/25 07:35 PM
1

Downvoting you is stupid, but also, yes there are exceptions. I think if you're honest with yourself you will find that those are just that. Exceptions. Although portraying American horror story as anything other than a man hating fever dream is a real stretch on your part.
/r/MensRights17/10/25 05:13 PM
7

Women buy things. Women control a significant portion of household purchases. Men have consistently been portrayed as dumbasses throughout my lifetime. Advertisers cater to their audience and it's primarily women. Nothing new about this and from an advertisers perspective it makes sense. I always bring this up when people talk about portrayals of gender in the media. Almost every sitcom since the 70s has a dumb out of shape man who wouldn't be able to tie his shoes if his smart beautiful wife wa…
/r/MensRights17/10/25 05:07 PM
46

Say what you want about men's rights, women's rights, feminism, culture, whatever (and I generally don't agree with some of the more extreme views on this board) the hypocrisy that exists between women's attitudes towards what men find attractive and men's attitudes towards what women find attractive is inarguable and I've literally never heard a group of women even try to justify it. I've sat in rooms of women in the workplace and listened to them opine about a famous man taking his shirt off o…
/r/MensRights05/06/25 06:55 PM
1

Yeah, I'm not sure if you're trying to be edgy or not but I have no idea what a 304 is, the vast majority of people aren't considering "modesty", and if you think a girl being at a bar means she "sleeps with anything that moves" I don't know what to tell you other than that's a You issue. The stereotype that literally existing inside of a bar means you're sexually promiscuous is not bore out in any adult real life situation and is statistically impossible.
/r/MensRights09/05/25 03:55 PM
3

The challenge in my opinion is EVERYBODY OBJECTIFIES EVERYTHING. The whole premise is flawed. When women want a "good man" they're objectifying men. They're not thinking of them as people with wants and needs and issues and emotions, they're thinking of a good man as an object they want to have. Then when they meet the man they become a real person to them. You want love? You objectify love. You're not thinking about all the complexity, the struggles, the nuance, different types of love, they're…
/r/MensRights09/05/25 01:09 AM
2

When the subjects of this post talk about "religion", they are most certainly talking about abrahamic religions and yes I would claim that they were invented. Religion as a concept? I'd agree with you. Or more likely spiritual belief. But in the context of this question, nobody is talking about cargo cults or northern European paganism, they're talking about the ten commandments and the prophet Muhammad.
/r/MensRights17/04/25 10:35 PM
3

You didn't. I'm not sure why I should. Are you saying that religion initially wasn't an effort to codify the roles people play in society?
/r/MensRights17/04/25 09:46 PM
1

Cool story.
/r/MensRights17/04/25 07:57 PM
3

Religion was made to control society to increase survival odds and at times, maintain power. In most of human history, traditional roles were the best way to do these things. You wanted men doing the hard labor and women raising the kids so that more men could be made to do more labor and more women could be made to have more kids. The byproducts of that are varied and often led to oppression for both men and women, but the argument that religion was made to oppress men is just as valid as sayin…
/r/MensRights17/04/25 05:50 PM
1

I'm the boss so it's good and bad. However, I have mostly women working for me and three guys and they are of many races, ages, and sexual orientations, and it's a wonderful team atmosphere where everyone has input and nobody is othered for who they are. You absolutely can do it without hammering an agenda 24 hours a day like at my old job. What I found towards the end of that job is that the women were just as sick of hearing it as the men that worked there were but the people pushing the agend…
/r/MensRights17/04/25 01:42 AM
1

Mental health inpatient facility management. Context was a conversation about a client's therapist posting lgbtqia information around one of the facilities and another client taking issue with it. With the severely mentally ill there's lot of sexism and racism and generally fairly backwards thinking because they tend to have no social filter and engage in black and white thinking. Half of the room was advocating for kicking the client who took issue out into the streets (which we couldn't legall…
/r/MensRights16/04/25 11:33 PM
5

Rarely have a problem ejaculating. But HOLY SHIT the times in my life when I couldn't, either from being too drunk or up in my head or whatever reason, the reaction from women has been crazy. I don't love them, I don't think they're attractive, there's something wrong with me, I Jack off too much, etc etc. When they can't cum it's my fault. When I can't cum it's my fault. Not every woman I've been with, but quite a few of them. Pathologizing almost every aspect of male sexuality is common and ac…
/r/MensRights06/04/25 07:16 PM
1

I'm not sure what you're going on about but how does any of that change the fact that women are drawn to those specific fields, which is indisputable based on the gender disparity? And saying that an entire gender is completely incapable of remorse or regret is absolute insanity. You're clearly so far down the rabbit hole it doesn't matter but I'm not sure you hear the words you say.
/r/MensRights17/03/25 04:25 AM
1

How will "more funding" overcome the aversion that any rational male has to hearing that he must feel ashamed of his "male privilege" during his training to become a therapist Men historically enter fields where pay is higher. There's a variety of reasons for that, societal ideas about being the "breadwinner", men being overall more career oriented, women being told they should do what makes them happy, men being told they should do what supports a family, etc. Higher pay and funding for mental …
/r/MensRights13/03/25 05:45 PM
1

I've worked in mental health for my entire career. It's absolutely true that the entire field is geared towards and populated by mostly women. There are reasons for this. One, women are naturally drawn towards "caring" fields like mental health, nursing, teaching, etc. Women aren't as income focused in general (although more now than last generations) for a variety of reasons and the mental health field pays like absolute shit comparatively to any other medical field. Two year degree nurses make…
/r/MensRights13/03/25 04:17 PM
1

I don't necessarily disagree with your key points (definitely with some of the details though) but if your therapist agrees with everything you say you're the opposite of lucky for finding him and your therapist agreeing with you in no way signifies you're "more right than every other idiot you've argued with". It just means your therapist isn't challenging anything you say, which again, makes them a shitty therapist. I've worked in mental health for 25+ years and finding a male therapist that s…
/r/MensRights13/03/25 04:02 PM
3

Men die at jobs, by suicide, and from many health issues more than women. Misandry exacerbates this at every turn. That's the only argument needed.
/r/MensRights07/03/25 09:41 PM
-2

Yeah let's be real here. While there's a lot of valid and honest discussion on this board there's also a decent amount of misogyny sprinkled in by certain folks. Calling women wombs for example, which is something I've seen lately.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 07:04 AM
7

Also, a long with it being bullshit statistically, it's likely that the men she saw that asked for full custody only did so when the mother was an incredibly unsafe person to have around their kids and DIDN'T ask for "full custody" then they thought the mother wasn't an unsafe parent because, you know, they cared about the mother being in the kids lives?
/r/MensRights20/02/25 11:06 PM
3

Because it attacks their worldview and they are conditioned to experience that as violence. For the unreasonable ones, this automatically makes you the enemy because to them men have it better in every single way and so to say that you must hate women and want them to be oppressed. I work with and employ primarily young women. If any comment is made that even remotely gets close to a concern about men's issues you can literally see a switch flip in some of them. You are the enemy. It's for sure …
/r/MensRights17/02/25 05:06 PM
36

People don't believe this story but earlier in my life I was a single dad and struggling finding a decent job and I went in to apply for healthcare for my son (in my state people under 18 are guaranteed healthcare under a state health plan). I was told that the waiting period to get him signed up was 6-9 months. I explained he needed dental work pretty quickly and asked what they could do. They said nothing. I was sent back out to the waiting area to get the forms and as I was filling them out a…
/r/MensRights06/02/25 06:02 PM
81

Having a son really opened my eyes to a lot of this stuff. I mean, I am also a guy obviously but it just didn't hit me as hard til I saw my son go through it. Especially in school. And I'm sure this realization happens for dads of girls as well but we just don't talk about the boys.
/r/MensRights06/02/25 05:55 AM
0

That's fair but the idea that women are some how more accepted when it comes to baldness is ludicrous to me. And I'm talking about men who shave their head BECAUSE they are balding.
/r/MensRights06/02/25 05:18 AM
-1

Balding man here. And it's fair that balding can be difficult for some men, especially at a young age, but I do think it's ridiculous to think that society accepts or celebrates balding women over men. Think of representation. There are balding men all over media, sure sometimes to make fun, but often never addressed because it's normal. You NEVER see balding women and I'd argue hair for a woman is a MUCH bigger deal than it is for a man. And I'm far from a modern feminist. I'd love to see all t…
/r/MensRights06/02/25 05:17 AM
-11

This is absolute horseshit. Balding men can just shave their heads and there's no issue with it IRL. Women with thinning/balding hair are definitely looked at differently IRL. Hell there's subs on Reddit for men to show off their shaved head to fight balding and men's balding treatments are advertised everywhere and you'll rarely see advertisements for this for women. In my experience male balding is seen very much as a "it just happens" thing whereas female balding is ignored, talked about behi…
/r/MensRights05/02/25 08:25 PM
4

Fascinating you think it's rare.
/r/MensRights01/02/25 03:51 AM
10

This is a fallacy. It costs the DA nothing to go to trial. They love to charge as much as they can, hoping to get you to plea to something less which still counts as a win for them. If you don't plea, they're not going to drop charges because of lack of evidence because then they look like idiots and DAs believe they can convince a jury regardless. The DA was probably pissed they took it to trial in the first place but they have the full weight and resources of the state behind them so It increa…
/r/MensRights31/01/25 04:59 PM
6

There's a vast difference between policy and practice. I work in mental health and have been in many rooms where management have openly discussed discriminating against candidates due to their presumed penis ownership.
/r/MensRights19/01/25 05:57 AM
102

Almost every day. I was also told in a meeting that "no one wants to hear you you're a white male" in a room full of management level women. My direct supervisor had to actually be convinced that was a fucked up thing to say, but she eventually agreed. I have also been accused of various things I didn't do because women were angry I was in management and they had an agenda. I no longer work there obviously.
/r/MensRights18/01/25 09:14 PM
2

I have yet to meet a woman, including my most recent ex, who talks at length about "feminist issues", "old boys club", glass ceilings, being a woman in a man's field, women having it worse than men "in every way", or any other current popular talking points, that wasn't a full on narcissist in their personal lives. Relationship-wise, they take no responsibility for their behavior in any way, gaslight their partners for having wants and needs in the relationship, and when things inevitably fail (…
/r/MensRights05/01/25 08:07 PM
11

They did the last one in a European country way back in the day (Norway maybe?) as they were on the front line of gender equality stuff starting back in the seventies. Requirements for equal female representation in all jobs (may have been government jobs can't remember honestly but this included things like garbage collector, police, etc) and they got there. Then they removed the requirements and everyone just self selected back into their traditional job roles in a generation. I'm not saying w…
/r/MensRights04/01/25 08:09 PM
4

Oppression exists and it's economic, not gendered.
/r/MensRights30/12/24 09:58 PM
1

Your entire view is just flat out wrong in the real world and I'd argue holding these beliefs drastically effects how you interact (or don't) with women. I'm 48 and have been in the online dating world off and on the last ten years and it's dogshit. Probably better for me than people your age due to women my age having different priorities. But still dogshit. Most guys just aren't going to find someone that way and there are full reddit boards about how bad it is. I had the most luck with hinge …
/r/MensRights26/12/24 02:50 PM
-1

You're far too online man. Yes, there are problems with societal views of masculinity but get in the real world. Sexual partners? The average for men is 6-8 and for women is 4-8. Even if all women taking the CDC/health surveys lied by by a hundred percent they don't get to your weird numbers. My number is twenty something and most women I've been with were between 4-5 and a couple of outliers that matched my number. Surely there are women that have slept with 50-100 people. They CERTAINLY aren't…
/r/MensRights26/12/24 08:15 AM
2

The premise that men don't idolize people that do terrible acts is both idiotic and fascinating in that you actually think that. I'm not sure what world you live in. Look at the cult around our president elect, or all the idiots walking around with CHE t shirts. A very specific type of woman goes after people in jail for crimes and serial killer types. Not "women". Half the country is "idolizing" Luigi for various reasons. As to why women are attracted to true crime (which is infinitely more com…
/r/MensRights24/12/24 12:24 AM
20

I've worked in an almost completely female dominated field my entire career. It's fascinating. They absolutely look down on any man day to day as basically useless children especially when they have any issues that come anywhere near being emotional while they constantly talk about their feelings and issues and are the absolute first to go to HR for any reason whatsoever and are almost always treated like a victim by hr. They talk massive shit about each other behind their backs and are constant…
/r/MensRights21/12/24 07:12 PM
-3

Ad hominem attacks to start the reply. Smooth brain indeed.
/r/MensRights24/11/24 12:48 AM
-7

Wrong. Women couldn't vote, couldn't own property in some places, couldn't have a credit card, couldn't get a divorce, etc.etc.etc. yes, "chivalry" was a privilege (that came with LOTS of expectations women had to adhere to as well) and yes, not having to go to war or die in the mines was definitely a female privilege but the poster said there has NEVER been male privilege and that's just a delusion. We need to be honest about history and honest about the present as well. Feminists are more hone…
/r/MensRights23/11/24 08:25 PM
-9

This is absolutely ridiculous. There has been codified male privilege for thousands of years. The issue now, is that it has absolutely flipped in the last twenty or more years and nobody's willing to admit it or address it because it would go directly against the story we have all told ourselves. And it would require openly talking about how to help men and young boys. Doing that is a death sentence in the media and academia. Denying that men are currently losing the battle of the sexes almost c…
/r/MensRights23/11/24 07:45 PM
3

Recent forbes article very clearly says that there is a pay gap for "uncontrolled" data. This is primarily skewed by rural areas and the South where women tend to work service jobs. 74 cents to a dollar. The article then goes on to say the "controlled" data (same job, same education, same hours) shows pay is even nationwide and in most major metro areas controlled data shows women making 103 cents to the dollar. None of this matters. Almost every woman I know believes there is a significant gap …
/r/MensRights22/11/24 05:17 PM
15

Was talking to a coworker about problems she was having with her son and then she cited all of these books she was reading and talks she was listening to. I asked her very nicely "who wrote those books"? She responded with why does that matter? Well, women don't go to men for help on their issues and specifically want men out of those spaces. Why does it make sense for you to look to women for men's issues? Surprisingly she agreed and said she was going to try to find male authors/experts on her…
/r/MensRights19/11/24 06:17 PM
1

Bull and you know it. Vance has said he wants it to be illegal. Repubs have voted against IVF and birth control. Trump's judges overturned roe. Trump has supported a 20 and 15 week ban while in office, and he has publicly applauded the statewide bans that occurred after roe. The only reason he changed his stance this election was due to polling. I don't have a clear opinion on abortion but it's disingenuous as hell to say "that's it".
/r/MensRights06/11/24 03:27 PM
0

Cutting off nose to spite face. Nice.
/r/MensRights03/11/24 07:59 PM
-5

I still can't believe how delusional this stuff is. I mean I know it's out there but it still hits me when I see it. You don't like the democratic process that's fine. The alternative is what? This delusional shit about him wanting to blow things up and that will somehow fix things is insane. He is unabashedly in the pocket of big business and will do anything to make sure he and his big money supporters get theirs. He has no respect for the law in any way, or the "democratic process" as you put…
/r/MensRights03/11/24 07:59 PM
5

Because, while I agree with almost all of your post, "what's in it for me"? Shouldn't be a deciding factor on supporting something that seems to a)align with your values and b) be the ethical choice. This is why we don't have universal healthcare and free college. Ethical narcissism.
/r/MensRights24/10/24 03:11 PM
3

Certainly has been a rash of revenge stories where the punishment for bad behavior is completely disproportionate. Midsommar: boyfriend wasn't there for me emotionally? Burn alive. It's what's inside? Boyfriend maybe kinda wanted to cheat on me, life in prison for a murder he didn't commit. Oh and let's not forget Bad Monkey, which has a protagonist that raped one of her high school students and is portrayed as a sympathetic character who is "tired of catering to powerful men so she can be taken…
/r/MensRights14/10/24 03:05 PM
1

Multnomah county in Oregon posted an internal job posting specifically only for a LGBT person, special consideration for trans applicants. This was for a mental health care coordinator and the reasoning was that trans clients should only have to work with coords that are trans. Given that the trans population in general is small the client pool is incredibly small that trans person would have to also work with many populations where this would be specifically a disadvantage. When I brought that …
/r/MensRights20/06/24 03:33 AM
2

I think it's a lot more complicated than that. Divorce rate skyrocketed in the 60s and peaked in the early 80s and has been declining steadily since. Is suppose it's possible that your theory is correct but there's no good way to actually measure that. What you can measure is societal attitudes, the economy, civil unrest, number of children produced by marriages, etc. Personally I think there's some truth to less "bad" marriages having some impact but people are having less children, are less ec…
/r/MensRights31/05/24 04:59 AM
4

It's rate not total number. So at these numbers, a decline in number of marriages wouldn't be a valid correlation to a decline in divorce rate.
/r/MensRights31/05/24 12:30 AM
22

Yeah. But IRL lesbians (I'm around quite a few) are happy to admit it's real.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 11:07 PM
94

Perceived options and sex. That's literally it. Women perceive (correctly) that they have more options. They are constantly told by society not to "settle" (which means don't do the work to keep a relationship functioning) and that their value is intrinsic (not based on any work they've done on it for themselves). If you had ice cream offered to you every day for free you'd start passing on the ice cream. If I've cream was only available once a year you'd eat the ice cream. And men want to have …
/r/MensRights30/05/24 09:39 PM
3

Congratulations..I got my son at age 12 (he's 16 now) after years of courts siding with his alcoholic mom and drug addict abusive stepdad. There's lots of trauma we're working through but I couldn't be more proud of him. Enjoy your time together!
/r/MensRights28/05/24 02:28 PM
1

My partner is a completely reasonable woman who is incredibly smart and able to think through the things she believes and is empathetic towards other people. She is a high level official in emergency services and has busted her ass her whole life to get there. She has her issues, just like everyone, but is at her core a very good person. Two things that we've talked about since meeting and that happen quite often: She sees the attitude towards my son (from another relationship) in various situat…
/r/MensRights15/05/24 05:56 PM
6

Yeah i drive a good 2.5 hours a day in traffic and the ratio of male to female texting drivers feels about 50/50. I don't think there's a huge difference between the subs other than one is lauded and the other is vilified..
/r/MensRights30/08/22 06:18 PM
14

Always. This, to me, is also directly tied to "whataboutism". "99.9999999% of the time this is how things go" "Well .0000001% of the time it goes this way I don't like so this is a huuuuuge problem!" It's all narcissism to varying degrees. We do it too, just in different ways.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 06:12 PM
1

Oh given her likely audience i find it completely plausible those laughs are not forced. Like I'm sure after a while in north korea you vigorously clap with joy after every sentence your great leader says without even having to think about it.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/11/21 08:29 PM
66

This. I'm 20 years behind you, but I had a woman in her 40s attempt to withhold certain sexual acts because "you haven't posted pictures of us on Facebook yet". WTF?
/r/PussyPassDenied06/07/21 05:53 PM
1

"actual feminists?" You mean the ones that coined the phrase toxic masculinity and then just quietly decided to apply it to the majority of things that men self-identify as what makes them masculine? I really don't know what you mean by actual feminists here because it's very clear that academic feminists abhor masculinity in almost all it's forms. Don't even get me started on their pathologization (i know that's not the right word there) of male sexuality.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/01/21 04:16 PM
1

annihilation was great. AFAIK it came out the same year as ghostbusters. Ghostbusters was trash. Both scifi movies. Both with mostly female casts and all female leads. Both did poorly at the box office. Which movie did everyone push and freak out about? Ghostbusters. Nobody said a word about annihilation. They want the controversy and that's why they push the trash film. You know what else has been bombing at the box office? EVERYTHING (or almost everything). Terminator bombed. People are just g…
/r/PussyPassDenied19/11/19 06:28 AM
6

Wait "maximum female benefit?" So they're not even placating anyone with talk of equality any more?
/r/PussyPassDenied12/11/19 10:51 PM
2

I would also like to add, and I'm not trying to get on my high horse here, but someone with a similar but slightly different viewpoint would easily find your "memes" you've posted "horrifying". 9/11, suicide, making fun of fat people?
/r/PussyPassDenied21/10/19 03:25 PM
1

Horrifying is a bit much, but I get that most people have completely lost their ability to understand how hyperbolic they tend to be nowadays so whatever. Animal torture is horrifying. Child abuse is horrifying. Limbs and body parts strewn about the street after an explosion is horrifying. Someone getting knocked out is not. It's shitty for sure, but let's save the big words for big things. That being said, i personally don't get enjoyment from fights or violence in general so I'm not in the cat…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/10/19 03:18 PM
11

Just a heads up, but this is the keystone in the whole thing. Opinions. They move the goalposts for what constitutes truth and facts by using terms like "your truth". It removes the objectivity of any fact or nonfact and makes every opinion or experience "truth". The moment you hear someone say "your truth" be aware that they have either been completely brainwashed or cannot think for themselves or have an ulterior motive. If everyone has "a truth" that is "your truth" then "the truth" no longer…
/r/PussyPassDenied06/09/19 05:19 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter