TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

theessentialnexus Archive

View 5 posts and 33 comments by theessentialnexus on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

I pay for coins but haven't seen any free coins I can use. Lame.
/r/MensRights13/01/21 02:50 PM
0

You're right.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 12:26 PM
4

The only way to do that is to tell people to get out of their comfort zone. Life sucks if you don't push yourself out of your comfort zone because there are so many great things to find - some related to work, but many not.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 12:22 PM
29

Friday after work brain. :P
/r/MensRights28/09/18 10:46 PM
1

This woman clearly has a vivid memory of this exact man attempting to rape her. Because she couldn't be lying? Not even possibly? I think a lot of people would sacrifice a lot to even moderately inconvenience Trump. She has a special opportunity to do so.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 10:36 PM
2

Has it been shown that he was a drunken douchebag? Also, if he was a drunken douchebag at 18, shouldn't we discount that almost completely? You can change a lot in 36 years. What is his character today?
/r/MensRights28/09/18 10:27 PM
1

I like how one of your boys appears much louder than the other! I wonder if it's the younger one or the older one.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 10:15 PM
13

Fuckin' Eugene Oregon, man. That place is fun to go for a weekend but just don't sniff the politics.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 03:09 PM
17

A real-life hero.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 03:07 PM
2

It is, but the 13th(?) amendment left it to congress the exact details of how to protect the classes. Congress decided only people aged 40 and above are given protections from discrimination. Below that age, any age discrimination is legal.
/r/MensRights02/02/18 08:51 PM
4

Ctrl F did not find it?
/r/MensRights31/01/18 04:41 PM
1

It's not a discriminatory test, but it is discriminatory act because they made a change to the test specifically to benefit women. It lowers the standard necessary to succeed and lessens the benefits of an Oxford degree for Maths and Computer Science students.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 09:08 PM
3

But there aren't that many more men than women in Denmark. Does this mean they are hugely in debt?
/r/MensRights16/01/18 03:42 PM
1

Cats are like pringles. It's never just 2.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 08:05 PM
7

Lol Tucker always invites strawmen on to his show. There are too many women who actually believe this, though. I was just waiting for him to tell her "hypothetically speaking, if I rated you, like a 4/10, would that be sexual assault? Or because I don't find you attractive, is that not contributing to rape?"
/r/MensRights14/12/17 03:24 PM
8

It harms our side because we look like babies.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 03:41 PM
9

We can beat them on logic without resorting to (potentially homophobic) name-calling.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 03:24 PM
5

The other way to look at it is that men's team is objectively better at soccer than the women's team in every way. I would guess that men who play at the same level as women are vastly underpaid because they are probably out of the top 50 to top 100 teams in the world. But since professional soccer is a business I think that the monetary angle is a better way to look at it instead of pure athleticism.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 02:28 PM
6

I like the idea of requiring sources for memes here. Also, regardless of anything else, thank you for modding one of the most important subreddits on the site!!!
/r/MensRights01/12/17 02:19 PM
4

I mean that's plain not true. He decided not to swipe them away. Regardless of his decision to swipe them away, however, he still should not feel pressured to allow them to fondle him.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 02:17 PM
2

I love that. From a framing standpoint of course no one would say they are pro-male genital mutilation so it can get buy-in without having a conflict about circumcision generally.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 09:59 PM
1

Since this was hypothetical, even if the results aren't due to random variance, how do we know this doesn't just test the desire to seem generous to the interviewer?
/r/MensRights11/10/17 09:28 PM
1

[REMINDER] no brigading. This sub will stop existing if admins can substantiate brigading claims.
/r/MensRights14/09/17 01:50 PM
2

Wouldn't that fall under seperate-but-equal though? I think they just have to remove the women's only time. How do bathrooms deal with seperate-but-equal? Hmmm.
/r/MensRights12/09/17 05:39 PM
4

Men get cat called too. I understand it is more common with gay men. Just the culture.
/r/MensRights06/09/17 05:59 PM
1

The post does not imply that. But the post does not contradict that either. Whether affirmative action works with training and education is up for debate.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 03:51 PM
1

*FT Opinion section
/r/MensRights09/08/17 04:39 PM
3

If it were properly sourced it would. I don't know why NPR posted that tweet.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 04:34 PM
3

Lol have to experience death too to compare.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 06:23 PM
16

Murder is worse than rape. No way.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 04:53 PM
3

I thought this would be a really bad source, but it is the Sydney Morning Herald.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 03:36 PM
17

It needs to be a public archive. Screenshots are easy to fake.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 07:36 PM
1

Could you explain?
/r/MensRights19/08/16 06:27 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter