TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

thefalchionwielder Archive

View 0 posts and 22 comments by thefalchionwielder on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

The US has a significantly higher number of killing sprees AND a higher suicide rate than Japan
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 04:19 AM
0

She said that overall men with bachelor’s make more than women with a bachelor’s. She didn’t say that they were the same bachelor’s.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 05:15 AM
8

So your point is women don’t want men who sit in their basement all day?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/24 03:00 PM
7

I thought it wasn’t a gendered thing and people don’t treat unattractive people very well in general
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 06:21 PM

Everyone knows this, why are you posting about it
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 03:15 PM
3

The fact that whiny shamers exist in the redpill doesn’t mean that it’s the redpill that tells them to do so. Like, there are lots of militant vegans but nothing about veganism itself tells people to be militant assholes
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 02:04 AM
12

If you had the first pick in the NBA draft would you rather draft the dude averaging 50 points, 40 rebounds and 20 assists at a D1 powerhouse or a dude averaging 4 minutes a game at some random junior college?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/23 01:53 PM
18

Nowadays they want to have adventure and excitement while they have a simp footing the bill
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/23 10:37 AM
1

It is literally a skill issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/23 07:16 PM

I’m pretty sure this is a parody post of the “average men don’t deserve relationships” that was up yesterday
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/23 07:04 PM
3

They only wanted their kids to be boys because boys had the potential to bring in more money for the family. If they failed to do so then they were just as valueless as when they were born
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/23 12:29 AM
6

I don’t see how any of this is of any relevance. The point is that Passport bros perceive foreign women to be of higher quality wives, regardless of whether it is true or not. Since non-Western men see their women as wife material perfectly fine, then why would they bother going to a different country?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 05:41 AM
1

It’s also perfectly natural behaviour for animals to kill and rape each other, but obviously no one is encouraging humans to be accepting of that behaviour
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/23 08:49 AM
1

Although I fully support LGBT rights, “because animals do it too” is a terrible argument for supporting something that humans do
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/23 08:40 AM
15

Probably because more than half of adults in the US are overweight
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/23 03:27 PM
3

Nobody is implying that. The point of the question is to answer which one is less terrible
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/23 03:33 PM
3

I agree that it’s a stupid question but if you’re not going to choose why bother answering
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/23 03:03 PM
55

I don’t think you understand how math works
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/22 03:20 PM
1

This fact actually further reinforces my point. Because so many women have been killed, China is gonna run into problems because there aren’t going to be enough women to keep it going. The reason they want sons is so that they can join the workforce to support the family- which only pays off if they eventually manage to amass enough wealth to do so-if they can’t, they’re valueless.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/22 04:17 AM
1

Just because science has progressed does not mean that humans have forgotten their primal instincts. Sure, it could be more valuable to have more men nowadays because they do all of the physical labour. That doesn’t change the fact that we’re still hard-wired to act as we have done for ages.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/22 04:12 AM
4

As I already stated, this is NOT about what I personally think, but for the sake of argument- at the end of the day, humans are just another animal. We straight up don’t need 1 man for every woman to keep the species going. Leave aside all the modern society stuff (coal miners, construction workers etc which are 99% men)- from a biological standpoint, only the top percentage of men are really needed. “Women and children first” makes sense because we need them to keep the species going. Therefore…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 02:19 PM
61

While I don’t agree with that they’re saying (so don’t get mad at me for saying it), I think their point is that women don’t NEED to offer anything. All women, simply by virtue of being a woman, have an intrinsic value that men do not. Unless you bring something extra to table (money, power, etc.), men are literally born valueless. Therefore it would make sense that there will be tons of valueless men clamoring for any woman they can get, and so women don’t even need to offer anything to get men…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 08:27 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter